Batu's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Batu's Profile › Batu's Posts
Yes, ewu prof 707, Jesus is the ONLY BEGOTTEN son of God. And you are also right (without knowing) with this statement: We all know that if a son happens to be the only begotten son, it means that he is the first and last born and no other child from his parentsYes, that is one of the titles of Jesus Christ, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End, Alpha and Omega. He is the only begotten son of God; but Israel is His son by adoption, and so are all those who believe in Jesus Christ as Lord, and believe in the Father who begat him. That is why Jesus said "I am in the Father and the Father in me." NB:If the Quran says Jesus is the word of God and the Spirit of God, pray tell me, how is the word and spirit of God separate from God? |
belloti:Belloti, Belooootiiiii, ![]() Haba aboki, you no dey think at all before you post? Or is it islamic to reason upside down? She will get justice and then gets punished. Those who worship a confused god will definitely become confused themselves.Toyin is a born again Christian, and she is resting in the bossom of the one and only Lord, who is the ONLY way to Heaven. As for her murderers, they've shed human blood, and the unchanging word of God will come to pass on them to the third and fourth generation concerning judgement for shedding blood. Unless they genuinely repent and ask God (not confused allah) for forgiveness. Their hell has already started here on earth, in their minds, their families, their society. Have you not heard that "the wicked runs when nobody is pursuing him/her." Belloti, you are probably smatter than allah + muhammed combined, but you are refusing to let your mind work. I recently saw some educated peoples (Hindus) in Wales who worship a "sacred cow" called 'Shambo'; but they are protesting against the Welsh veterinary department, because 'Shambo the sacred cow who is their god' has contracted bovine tuberculosis and has to be killed. I am pretty sure you will sympathise and identify with them, isn't it? I read recently that Muhammed was identified in the Hindu holy book. Wake up man, true wisdom is from the one and only God, who is the father of Lord Jesus Christ. |
nossycheek:@nossycheek and stimulus, Thanks for the question. To answer it, we do not even need to go to the Biblical account; we just need simple arithmetical sense (not even mathematical sense) In the Quran, when Muhammed was asked which is the oldest Mosque, he answered that it is the Kaaba and he also said the second oldest mosque is the Al-aqsar mosque in Jerusalem (currently occupying the site of the temple built by Solomon). When Muhammed was asked how many years separated the two "oldest mosques", he said 40 years. Now, it is on record and we know that the temple built by Solomon was built around 950BC; thus by Muhammed account in the quran, that means the earliest time that the Kaaba could have been built was 40 years earlier i.e around 990BC; assuming that the temple was destroyed and the Arab occupation of Israel occured immediately after building the temple (which is definitely not the case, as the Arab occupation occured much later) The simple arithmetical question is this: How could Abraham who lived and died at least 1000 years before the temple of Solomon build the Kaaba? Did he come back from the dead? I don't think so! Thus Muhammed and the Quran are lying? Definitely! We do not need the Bible to prove that, only a small Casio calculator possibly. ![]() |
Hi guys, This is a very interesting (but lenghty) article in today's Guardian newspaper by one Debo Luwaji. Please read! ===================================================================== Election 2007: But there is God in Heaven By Debo Luwaji THIS sounds downright defeatist, doesn't it? But then when the powerful unjustly employs his might to pummel you into submission, what do you do except to hand him over to God? You can fight, kick and curse as much as you like, but what would all these amount to? More punishment, perhaps. Take the case of the recent elections in Nigeria about which a lot of dust has been raised, I am ready to bet that given the same circumstances and under the same umpires, if the elections are re-organised five times the same winners would not only emerge repeatedly, some of the current front line losers would eventually end up with figures that are no more than the votes of their immediate families! So why not simply leave the matter to God. And this, incidentally, is what the oppressor always desires of the oppressed - a stoic resignation to fate in the face of severe hurt and injury. He does not mind being handed over to God. Does he care even? I am referring here to the governorship, assembly and presidential elections of April 14 and 21, 2007. Although hundreds were killed and several more injured in election-related violence across the country, the situation was mercifully nowhere near the Armageddon that many Nigerians and our international friends had feared might become the lot of our nation. Even the government and INEC have since continued to harp on the elections being largely peaceful, as though the death and maiming of a number of Nigerians no longer count for much in a country where death, poverty and misery have long become the stark realities of everyday life. Yet we must never forget that the tone of a violence-prone electoral exercise was set by General Olusegun Obasanjo himself, when on national television he declared once and again that the then forthcoming election was a "do-or-die affair". Historians and political analysts may yet examine the connection between this absolutely unpresidential declaration and the general voter apathy on one hand - a situation in which millions of registered voters opted to stay back in the safety of their homes on those election days; and the pockets of violence witnessed in several parts of the country during the election. However, what matters for now is that the elections have been held and have been declared as free and fair enough in the estimation of INEC and the ever-winning Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). The results announced showed that there was no voter apathy of any kind - except perhaps in the imagination of some of us, and that PDP has lost absolutely no grounds since the last elections in 2003 in spite of perceived miss-governance, decamping of influential party men or the strength of any opposition. Rather, the results show that Nigerians are more in love with the ruling party today than ever before, even to such extent that the PDP won in places where they fielded no candidates. Shame to those who thought excellent performance is a yardstick for re-appointment. The nation may today be enveloped in near-total darkness, roads impassable, the people may wallow in abject poverty and pensioners die in droves while awaiting their stipends, yet our multi-billion dollar debts to external creditors are cleared in world record time! It is still PDP for life! That we all knew the entire process was programmed to fail from the beginning, means absolutely nothing at the end of the day. Yes, everyone said it, that Professor Maurice Iwu was on a wuruwuru mission - acting at every turn in the best interest of the party in power, perhaps more vociferously than any card-carrying PDP members could ever have done. As he was banning key opposition candidates from the electoral process despite court rulings, his counterpart at the Economic and Financial crimes Commission (EFCC) was hounding others into hiding or submission, while the president himself was boastfully affirming 'guilty as charged' on those affected, as though these organs and the presidency were one and the same. And so, whatever we knew all along has now been confirmed by the shoddy conduct of the elections and the outrageous results. But then, just what can anyone do about it? Those enlightened enough to make a difference with their comments are too busy minding their own businesses. The masses are too ignorant to realise the extent to which they had been short-changed, and too hungry to care. Not when their little daily earnings have been severely decimated by some senseless, seemingly interminable holidays and compulsory stay-at-home. Anyone calling them into some kind of street demonstration is wasting his time. Not when the soldiers are still on the streets anyway. Chief Ken Nnamani, President of the Senate and the number three man in the country's political structure described the elections as a complete sham, and wondered why every election in Nigeria always turned out worse than the previous one. He was being charitable. Whereas the 2003 elections were also massively rigged to the knowledge of all, the style of the manipulations was such that not a few Nigerians were ready to concede that perhaps PDP won because it played smarter by promoting a fraudulent alliance with the opposition, especially in the South West, which ultimately worked in its favour and to the eternal regret of the rest. Those who plotted the 2007 fiasco had no time for such risky permutations and could not even bother to dignify us with a decent show. It was worse than daylight robbery! Billions of naira from our commonwealth allocated to INEC coupled with the colossal financial losses to both the nation's economy and to millions of already over-stretched Nigerians on account of the work-free days was merely to achieve such ignoble end. A masterpiece of unintelligent fabrication already described as perhaps the worst organised election in world's history. And to think that this was under the supervision of a professor! Little wonder why Nigerians and their certificates are treated like rubbish wherever they go. But come to think of it. Professor Maurice Iwu and those who call the shots at Aso Rock knew that those flamboyant figures announced in favour of PDP could not fool anyone. For one, the elections were intensely monitored by the opposition, as well as by curious local and international bodies. Secondly, the proceedings across the country were transmitted live on those election days by almost all the local TV stations, clearly showing the happenings on polling days, including the empty stands, queues of frustrated intending voters who remained unattended to at 7.00 p.m.; the cases of under-aged voters, the stuffing of ballot boxes and carting away of several others by gun-totting gangsters; the littering of thousands of voter cards in some centres - already thumb-printed in favour of PDP, and so on and so forth. The question is, given such widespread and well-published irregularities, could INEC's shameless allocation of figures have been meant to hoodwink anyone? I do not think so. Methinks it was simply a case of take it or leave it. As expected, the powers that be have asked those dissatisfied with the umpire's verdict to seek redress at the election tribunals, or better still to embrace peace for the sake of our nascent democracy and accept the religious fact that God enthrones whom He chooses. Chikena. Now this is the crux of the matter. Indeed there is God in heaven, but could He be the same God to whom the victor and vanquished are presently turning? In expressing his disappointment at the results, Major General Muhammadu Buhari started by giving Him thanks and praises. Senator Ben Obi, running mate to Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, was at St. Paul's church, Breadfruit, Lagos the other Sunday along with other opposition leaders to report their traducers and pray for the repose of the souls of those killed during the elections. Meanwhile, congratulatory messages are inundating the newspapers. Thanksgiving services are also being organised to thank God for these recent victories while several people have begun to jostle for positions in the yet-to-be formed governments. In their hearts, are these jubilating Nigerians - winners and their well-wishers alike, aware of the many flaws of the electoral process which rendered the outcome suspect, if not totally invalid in several states? Do they in all good conscience believe that this whole charade is deserving of celebration? As they gather in churches and mosques, would they be praying to this same God? Does it matter how all these affect the psyche of the average youth to whom parents and teachers never tire of preaching morality? President Obasanjo will no doubt appreciate these sentiments. He is a Christian. Could we ever forget that historical 1999 picture of a sober and humbled figure whose speeches were richly laced with Godly avocation soon after he emerged from unjust incarceration? Please recall that before he could re-run for the 2003 elections, Chief Obasanjo had to wait on God while the entire nation was waiting on him. Is God still speaking to our president? I mean this same God whom we are told abhors vengefulness and haughtiness? Does the president in good conscience believe that INEC's total bungling of the recent elections were mere 'mistakes'? Is OBJ's mission to remain our messiah, willy nilly, one who must now forever sit in judgement over the affairs of Nigerians, a godly undertaking? Are the endless political crisis in Anambra, Oyo, Pleateau, Imo and Ekiti states among others, where intractable impostors and untouchable gangsters openly claimed allegiance to Aso Rock, in all sincerity, symbolic of an impartial father still in constant communion with God? This same God? It has been said that those who make peaceful change impossible, make violent change inevitable. Someday, somehow, somewhere God will yet raise a devil (we've seen enough of messiahs please) to whom all platitudes of peace and Godliness will mean absolutely nothing. He would come with sword and spare none who had oppressed the hapless and the helpless. And when he is through with the cleansing, he would tell all who cared to listen that he was merely doing God's bidding. This very same God Reference link: http://www.guardiannewsngr.com/editorial_opinion/article04 |
Brother it seems you are confused with the word 'nations'. For your understanding, read Mathew 19 v 27-29 and you will get the clearer picture of antions. The nations comprises the twelve tribes of Israel in which Jesus will judge and not including gentiles. He will judge the nations of Israel because he was sent to them. ![]() @All, I once knew a man who "was born" a Christian, then he "became" a muslim, and even went to Mecca and "became" an Alhaji; later he "became" a Catholic; but to the glory of God, he has now "given his life" to Christ and is a born-again child (not slave) of God. Probably blabs787 is not far behind: he appears to passionately have a heart to know God, but pride is still standing in his way. It also appears he's "read a lot in" the Bible (although lopsided), but he has not allowed the Bible "to read his heart" hence it is easy for him to get seriously confused as is seen in the above quoted statement. That is why he tries to "cross-reference" biblical passages with the Quran, and also try to validate Quranic claims with Biblical passages. God himself is the father of all mercies and owner of salvation, I pray he will 'reveal' to you what you are looking for that is not lost only that blabs787 cannot recognise it yet. Confused? Seriously! Peace out |
babyosisi:Awesome!! Yorubas' have a proverb thay says "whosoever speaks big english in the house of his/her in-laws, must have to provide the translation." This adjective in bold is definitely too big for blabs787. On the other hand, I was waiting for how long the proverbial "handshake to blabs and belloti" would last and I don't have to wait long. This is not about "respecting religions" but more about an attempt to encourage "compromise": the moment light decides to accomodate, or compromise, with darkness, it loses it's power to enlighten the path and minds of people. If respecting religion entails not critically apprasing the basic tenets of a religion or it's acclaimed prophet simply to maintain peace, that is not respect; it is the islamic plot of 'Hudna' (false cease-fire) used to cover or prevent illumination of it's inherent lies and deception. Anybody will be proud to make his/her boast in the life, lifestyle, ministry and teachings of Jesus Christ; and even invite all and sundry "to come see a man who told me all things about my life" like the Samaritan woman who then asked "is this not the messiah." If we cannot make our boast in the perfect and sinless life of the Only Lord and Saviour, then is our faith based on a lie; but we can make the boast, Thus, if you cannot make a boast of a perfect and sinless life and teachings of the prophet of Islam, then it is our duty to encourage or challenge you to do so; peradventure by so doing, you will see 'the lie' or 'the liar' on which you are basing your 'faith'. That is brotherly love, and not 'respecting religion' which is an acronym for bulls,,,t.!! Peace out. |
,,hum, blabs, the real slowpoke is anybody trying to look for scientific correlates in any book of religion or book of faith. Science is a product of human logic, faith operates outside the boudaries of human logic or comprehension,,,,,well, Islam is a product of human (or specifically Muhammed's) logic. Thus looking for scientific correlates in the Quran is doing a disavantage to your course, but probably indirectly speaking the truth that Islam is just works or rather contraption of human mind. We are waiting,,,,,,, ![]() |
38:72 says that when Allah created Adam He “breathed” His spirit into him, according to 2:34 immediate command (in 38:72) to bow down after that “breathing” happened only after Adam was told name of things, so maybe his spirit was created before it came to earth into human body, explaining how according to Bible Jesus said he was before Abraham was on Earth. 21:30 "Have not those who disbelieve known that the heavens and the earth were one (joined together as one united piece / as one unit of creation), before We clove them asunder (/then We parted them)? We made from water every living thing, will they not even then believe?",,,"hold your bearth, when the time comes",,,,,!!!. When will you stop this cowardly attitude. If you have something to say, say it or keep quiet with your 'I am coming back' posturing ofsomebody who has nothing to do or say. @udaiyah, I copied some portions of your 'thesis' above, and I will like to declare to you that, trying to fit Islam into a scientific model so as so advance it's course or acceptability is an exercise in vanity. A casual look at the 2 portions quoted above is enough to convince anybody of a desperate attempt to make sense of the insensible. While the big-bang is now increasingly becoming doubtful even among leading atheist scientists, you are trying desperately to fit Islam into the model. What happened to the men created from "mud" by the allahs, or from congealed blood, or from water, or from sperm. Which one sef. I am not surprised that babs787 is co-championing your course here; apart from the fact that you both belong to the 'commonwealth of Islam' which will prevent any objective reasoning, going by his previous performance, there is no need to 'wait' for him. ![]() |
belloti:@All, Quite an interesting chain of responses on this "handshaking" thread. My piece is just that anybody who calls himself or herself a Christian and "hates", or harbours any misgiving against, peoples based on religion (Muslims, Ogun worshippers, Ifa worsippers etc) or on 'ethnicity', or on anything, is nothing but a hypocrite or still immature. Because Christians are called to 'Love' and not to hate. In fact, if you read in the book of Isaiah (trying to get the exact chapter and verse) you will see where God declares his love for Arabs (Egypt and Assyria) but His inheritance with Israel. Our "God is Love" (1st John 4) who "loves the whole world so much that He gave his only beggoten son that whosoever believes in Him will not die but have everlasting life". (John 3:16) and that "while we were ('all') yet sinners, Jesus died for us." (emphasis mine) However, I have never seen anywhere in the Bible where God asked us to love and respect works of evil such as Islam in itself; rather God asked us to reprove or expose ALL works of evil both inside our lives, and outside in the world we live in. In doing this, no doubt we will come against oppositions from the adherents of such faiths; tricks and lies of political correctness; need "to respect each other" and "keep the harmony going" and idioms such as "you to your own religion, and me to mine." I will like to declare that while you all usually talk about 'Taqqiya' which actually is not universal in Islam depending on which sect you belong to; we all need to be very very (x1000) careful of the universal Islamic concept of "HUDNA" (You can research it and get understanding; it is also called 'hudibiyya' or 'khudaibiya'). I love you all 'individually' regardless of your religious or ethnic allifliation; but I will never love (nor respect) a known work or doctrine of evil like Islam because of my love for individual; neither will I keep quiet in reproving/exposing all such works of evil. Why?, because: "The fear (or respect) of man brings a snare, but the fear (or respect) of God is the beginning of wisdom." But my hand, my heart and prayers will remain extended for the 'proverbial' handshake to welcome anybody into the ONE fold, under the ONE and only Sheperd! Peace out! |
babs787:Hum,,,,okay let's see Luke 20 vs 27-36: "(27) Then came to him certain of the Sadducees, which deny that there is any resurrection; and they asked him, (28)Saying, Master, Moses wrote unto us, If any man's brother die, having a wife, and he die without children, that his brother should take his wife, and raise up seed unto his brother. (29)There were therefore seven brethren: and the first took a wife, and died without children. (30) And the second took her to wife, and he died childless. (31)And the third took her; and in like manner the seven also: and they left no children, and died. (32) Last of all the woman died also. (33)Therefore in the resurrection whose wife of them is she? for seven had her to wife. (34)And Jesus answering said unto them, 'The children of this world marry, and are given in marriage: (35)But they which shall be accounted worthy to obtain that world, and the resurrection from the dead, neither marry, nor are given in marriage: (36) Neither can they die any more: for they are equal unto the angels; and are the children of God, being the children of the resurrection." Now blabs787, When I read the passage, the first thing that came to my head was: "For God sake , what is the problem of this blab787? and how is this issue of resurrection, and the levirate marriage custom according to the Mosaic law, related to the question of having multiple wives?"Then it dawned on me that the reason a lot of peoples have uncomplimetary things to say about you, your questions and attitude, is simply because we try to reason with you on the assumption of the same level of understanding; and that is complicated by your usual arrogant I-know-it-all disposition. I therefore apologise for some names I have called you before. I will henceforth discountenance your attitude and when I have time, explain things as "simple" as possible to the best of my ability. Now, the passage you quoted is about "resurrection of the dead", the Sadducees do not believe in angels and in resurrection or after-life; and as such they came to Jesus to ask him one of the various "trick" questions based on the custom of "Levirate marriage" as prescribed in the Mosaic law (Deuteronomy 25:5). This marriage refers to situations in which a married man dies without having children, his brother can marry the widow. Now if we even focus on the "levirate marriage", you can see from the explanation that it is very different from having 2 or more wives at a go and countless "handbags" through temporary marriage. BTW, before you run with that again, the custom of levirate marriage is NOT in Christianity. However, the theme of the passage is on the resurrection, and you can see that Jesus taught on the resurrection of the saints in heaven, i.e in heaven there is neither marriage or giving out children in marriage, but we are like angles living in eternal glory of God and happiness. Compare to the lies of al-jannat with the promise of sex, sex and more sex, wine, beautiful boys, and food for 40 years on the table (i.e hedonism, glutony, pervertion, sodomy, etc). Hope this is simple enough for you, prof! |
babyosisi: ![]() Humm,,,,,,,,,,,,,okay apologies Babyosisi, But isn't it funny that you claim my statement or rather observation 'reeks' of tribalism; and then you quoted from, and referred to, just one of your own 'very active' contributions on a thread titled "Why Are The Yorubas' Always Tagged Untrustworthy, Why?", which is on the 'Racism, Tribalism, Sectarianism thread.' I went through the topic/thread you referred to, and other related topics, and,,,,, ![]() You are INDEED 'a very simple lady', and so accept my apologies once again,,,, but let's allow the topic go back to it's original discussion. |
'hum,,,,,,,,,,okay, I can see that Babyosisi does not like Islam and violence of it's prophet called Muhammed; and it also appears that she does not like Yoruba peoples too from that 'shocking' post of hers quoted by Texcee.! But what is also very unhealthy is going back as far as Nov 4 2006 to bring forward Babyosisi's quote unto this discussion simply to prove a point! ,,,,,,and, as much as I try, I could'nt close my eyes to the equally very 'unhealthy' ethocentric quotation too, supposedly coming from a 'christian.' However, personal issues aside; guys, don't derail the thread with off-topic discussions. Back to the Gombe issue and let's leave individuality out of it. If you want to continue, then go to the appropriate 'racist or racism' or 'politics' thread!!!!! |
On NTA Live, Umaru Musa Yar'adua is our next president. May God bless or rather help Nigeria. Well done. |
@babs787, I like TayoD response to you, it is the best. It is the same method of teaching that Jesus used in teaching and confouding the pharisees. That approach of teaching is called "Agg'ada" in Hebrew, which is a moral approach that will stimulate you to think. So therefore I repeat TayoD's question for you: "Which one of these jesus is the one spoken of in your Qu'ran?" |
Quote from Stimulus: It is not hard to read all these texts in their contexts and see that people are being compared to these animals. I may be a very odd Christian; but then, please understand that my style of debating issues with people (whether atheists, Muslims, or fellow Christians) is to be as objective as I can possibly be,,,,,My Dear Stimulating Stimulus; Far from it!! You are NOT a odd christian or person at all. You are indeed an objective individual 'as you can' possibly be. That is the point of having our senses, after all God said in Isaiah "Come and let us reason together,,,,,," Now if we look at all the passages you've quoted from the bible in which "people are compared to many things," you will see that there is none of them in which the comparism was because of their "race or ethnicity, gender etc"; but rather because of certain attitudes, behaviour or as a test of faith. You and I agree this is different from a prophet who claims "Jews" are monkeys; or that "women" have half a brain and are possessions like donkeys; or that satan looks like a "black man"; or that the heart of a "blackman" is as gross as a donkey. You can see that all these comparism are on the basis of unchangeable attributes; rather than on opinion or attitude. I therefore wonder what kind of god will say through his prophet that his creation is like a donkey, or like satan etc. I am sure you see the difference now between the false gods and prophet in the Quran, and the God who looked at ALL his creations and said in Genesis that "It is very good"!! Bless you, bro!! |
belloti:@Belloti, The only portion of your diatribe that is true is the first parapgraph! Yes, we do NOT love Islam; because the living God asked us to Love God and hate all forms of evil. Islam is a work of evil and we can't close our eyes to that: from the basic tenets of deception in it's doctrine, to the life and ministry of it's acclaimed perveted prophet called muhammed. There is nothing good about Islam, thus it is appropriate not to love Islam. However, those who are still blinded by the gods of this world cannot see the evil in it, but will try to rationalise and reason it out. But if you 'see' with the light of the true God in whom is no darkness (1st John 1 vs 5), then you'll know Islam for what it really is: DECEPTION, EVIL, PERVERTION, HEDONISM etc. Our kids who are being raised in the ways of the living God (,,,through faith in the "only way, truth and life" will definitely share our sentiment of hating all works of evil; BUT rather than kill a muslim they will go to God on their knees and interseed for a muslim to see the light of the Gospel of truth. Because our kids know that "if you fight all your battles on your knees, you will win everytime."NB: By the way, you can all read this brilliant editorial on the 'state of the Nigerian kid' in today's Guardian newspaper. It is about the muderous "kids" of Gombe. Although, it should have been approapriately titled the "state of the Nigerian kid raised in the ways of Islam." http://www.guardiannewsngr.com/editorial_opinion/article03 |
From Abdkabir: If only u knew the people Allah was talking about in that verse. Once again, the importance of understanding the context of revelation. The verse was about some jews who trangressed in the issue of the sabbath and thus were changed to monkeys.With fairness, islam didn't discriminate against blacks. You should know there was a black Man (Bilal) among the companions of the prophet@Abdkabir, You know, it is not really compulsory to respond to certain issues if your response or attempt to defend Islam or Muhammed will only confirm the accusation. This is what you've just done here. I don't mean to cause offense or be demeaning here, but I have long concluded that one cannot be a muslim and think with his brain at the same time. One must give way. Now silly Mo was accused of being a racist because he demeaned blacks; but in defence, you said he was not referring to blacks but only to "some jews"! Isn't that silly! Now whether they were black people, 'some' or all jews, chinese, mullato or whatever, what kind of god will command his prophet to 'compare black people to satan'?; and that "if a black man comes to you, his heart is more gross than a donkey's." From a supposed angel of god, right?Is that the same God who said in the Bible that 'whether jews or greeks, male or female, slave or freeborn,etc we are all one in God through faith in Jesus Christ.'(?) Definitely not the same God and definitely not an angel of the living God. We know silly Mo was an epileptic and also thought to be demon possesed. It is Shaitan, the master of the idols called allah, who talks to silly Mo through the fallen angels called nephillim. Never has this world seen a more insane and perveted prophet than muhammed; and his followers are keeping his dream alive. Now rather than say to you that 'your religion to you and mine to me', I will say to you that the God of all mercies will shine the light of the goodnews of true salvation into your life and remove the darkness imposed on you muslims by the god of this world, in the name of Jesus Christ, Amen! |
Seun: ![]() Thanks jare Seun!!!! Babasin, can you see the logical wisdom in Seun's analogy or you are still busy reading English upside down? |
Those who missed the programme can probably go to Inside Africa's page on CNN.com and download the recent edition titiled "Nigeria: Volatile Democracy." |
Dear All, This is what happens when cerebrally lazy peoples steal a lot of money; they don't even know how to lie and eventually confess without knowing. On CNN's Inside Africa yesterday (titled Nigeria's Volatile Democracy), Atiku was asked to comment on his indictment for corruption; listen to his response or defence, quoted word for word, as a self-titled leading oppositon condidate: "We established two anti-corruption agencies, the ICPC and the EFCC; unfortunately the EFCC has been turned to a machinery to harrass the opponents of the government. If corruption is done by the friends of the government, they cover it up; but if corruption is done by the opposition, they hurriedly jump on it." Can you believe this! A slip of tongue or rather a confession. From the abundance of the heart, the mouth speaketh. They showed his 5million dollar house in Abuja, 3million dollar house in Yola and another worth more than 3million dollars in high-brow area of Washington said to 'belong' to his wife Jennifer Atiku-Abubakar (a recent PhD student!) among many others, for a man who was a civil servant until mid nineties (i.e. custom officer). It is only in Nigeria that a thief proves his innocence by admitting to being corrupt, but that he is not the only one hence he is not guilty. Unfortunately, the thief who is caught is a thief; as for the others, their own time too will come; but Atiku's time is now. Barawo banza!!! |
@ALL: Muhammed bin-Abdullah DID NOT perfrom any miracles. He himself said so in the quran. See for your self: ===================================================================== - Sura 17:90-94 of the Qur'an tells about how, when Muhammad was challenged to perform a miracle and prove he was from the true god, he could not perform any and here he actually says himself: "Am I anything but a man,- a messenger? ". In Sura 13:7, we find that Muhammad did not perform any miracles. The people are saying that even one sign would be enough to convince them, just one miracle performed by Muhammad - and yet he still does none, ! All along, the unbelievers asked Muhammad to perform a miracle so that they could believe. All they got in response was, - Sura 17:90: They say: "We will by no means believe in you until you cause a fountain to gush forth from the earth for us.," And Muhammad would reply: - Sura 17:93: Say: "Am I anything but a man,- a messenger?" Muhammad did no miracles. He did not heal the sick, raise the dead, cast out demons, or rule the wind and the waves. He had no more power than any normal man. The famous Iranian scholar, Ali Dashti comments that Moslems, as well as others, have disregarded the historical facts. They have continually striven to turn this man [Mohammed] into an imaginary superhuman being, a sort of God in human clothes, and have generally ignored the ample evidence of his humanity. They have been ready… to present these fantasies as miracles. Reference: Ali Dashti, "Twenty Three Years: A Study of the Prophetic Career of Mohammad", |
MAMAJAMA:@attack-dog mamajama/majamaja, If your indolent mind will recall, you started the insults. You might just have forgotten due to short-term amnesia with the kind of demented mind you have. Read the post, who said Ribadu should be the next IG?. My point is he will make a better IG than your present equally moronic uncle. You can't see the difference because of your 'attack dog' approach! So with all the pointless questions you asked; are those suppose to be evidence that you know how the police run? That's why I said you're probably a dismissed civil defense corps member, trying to be in the know. Maybe you should go to your father backhome to get better understanding; that is if he knows better which is quite unlikely. When you will not read and understand due to your indolent 'bingo' mentality, how will you not jump and write nonsense. Onyi'ara! |
MAMAJAMA:@MAMAJAMA; Going by your name which sounded more like MAJAMAJA meaning "someone who catches a dog", I am not surprised at your rudimentary attack-dog mentality. Shows the kind of doggy company you keep. So what else do you know about the police?, maybe you are a retired police rank and file or a low level security guard, you've not shown or stated any thing of intelligence. So, what is wrong in Ribadu taking credit for job-well done by any organisation he heads; if the organisation mess up, wont he also take the blame?. That is part of the responsibilities of leadership. He has managed to achieve in the EFCC by carrying subordinates along, and he can do better as head of police force than your equally indolent uncle. You are not making any sense because you don't have much of it anyway. Mumu dog catcher!! McKren:I wonder too o, my brother. As of the last time I checked, Obasanjo is still the commander-in-chief of the entire armed forces of Nigeria. |
From Ricadelide: however, my balance point is this; there is a lot of things happening in the church (and by that i mean the body) at this time. we live in a time where a lot of things are being shaken, a lot of changes are taking place, and God is really moving. there are some people that are not into the present move of the spirit, and all they do is sit and condemn people who have decided to move along with the present move of God. so you have a lot of people tearing down true servants, because they do not understand the restorational move of God. now, that does a lot of harm, and i'm all against it.@ricadelide, You know what, I feel your statement quoted above. When I read the piece on Juanita Bynum's "No more Sheet" teaching by the 'chief pharisee' who introduced this discussion called Backslider, I decided to listen to the message. I could understand why any "self-righteous, cold-hearted pharisee, peddling religion rather than true spirituality" will find this her teaching as damnation and heretic. She decided to be plainly open and honest in teaching about her own constant struggles and weaknesses of the flesh and the need for God's help in daily crusifixion of the flesh; rather than the disguised self-deceptions of religious holiness. She's decided to move away from the pharisee-like "do as I say, don't do as I do" philosophy of the traditional church; in to "judge what I both say and do and your own selves, with the help of the spirit in all honesty." I have come to realize there are two ways to actually "backslide" in faith: one is to turn away from the Lord and return to the world; and the other is what you've stated i.e to remain stationary in 'religion' while 'spiritual' God has moved on. This is not an endorsement or defense of Juanita or any MOG or WOG; but a call to do what the apostle Paul said: to judge all things with the help of the Holy Spirit, and not with irrational backsliden "religious" mindset. Peace out! |
MAMAJAMA:and so what? The reason the present IG "taught, bossed and encouraged" Ribadu is for Ribadu to be better than him. And in fact he is better than Ehindero and actually more relevant to the progress of Nigeria than Ehindero whose major achievement is to talk louder than action,,,,,,, and maybe changing the police uniform. Ribadu as the IG will be a good thing for the nation. |
smile4kenn:Orji Uzor Kalu can not be ashamed of himself because he has no sense of shame. He is trying to replace Ojukwu as the 'Ibo Vanguard.' Unfortunately for him, Ibo's are too intelligent for a money-miss road like him to be the rallying point. He has noting to say other than to thrown cheap tribal politics; you have to understand the guy is only "half-literate and half illitrate." |
Aduks:@my dear Aduks, I beg to differ with you. Nigeria is NOT our own Jerusalem; Nigeria is our country and Jerusalem is Jerusalem. When the Lord God said through the psalmists in psalm 122 vs 6 that : "Pray for the peace of Jerusalem, they shall prosper that bless you." He was not asking you to pray for your country but to pray for the peace of Jerusalem in Israel literarily. It is the city of the most high God and christ is coming back to rule the world from Jerusalem. '"The (whole) earth is the Lord and the fullness therein." (Psalm 24) Therefore, we should pray for our country Nigeria as citizens of Nigeria because it belongs to the living God and He has made us it's citizen to do his will for the nation; and as Christians we should also pray for the peace of Zion or Jerusalem. God bless! |
ibrahim007:@All, Here comes another "closed-circuit" reasoning by Mallam (James Bond) Ibrahim007. What he has just said is that he "sympathises with the deceased and the family, but what's got to be-got to be." Isn't it? In other words, dont criticise Islam for what anybody does in the name of allah of Islam, because we are all one family and we support each other no matter what. Well, we have billions of true believers who do not fear your idol called 'allah' who is nothing more than one of the fallen angels or nephilims; as such we will judge both Islam and allah "itself" by faith. And the whole world regardless of faith, belief or unbelief will also judge Islam and 'allah' for the inherent immorality, pervesions and wickedness. |
belloti:BULLS*&T!!!!, And who the bloody hell are you? Just another quasi-intellectual 'taqqiya-ed' muslim called Belloti , nonsense!!. In fact, it is perfectly legitimate even for idol worshippers to look down on islam because it is such a dehumanising religion that has no pride of place in mordern world. With your kind of statement, I can perfectly consider you a waste of western education, stick to your quranic reasoning. I agree that "naturally", a person can be a muslim and be intelligent at the same time; BUT it is NOT possible "functionally" to be a muslim and be an intellectual. One will have to give way for the other, i.e the brain or the book of bullsh*t called quran. For proof, just read and re-read Belloti's thesis of reverse IQ above. So "she does not deserve to die" and the "kids were wrong", but at the same time "things like that happens when mistakes are made." Are you not seeing your closed or circular reasoning? you can not see it because you've allowed the intellectual in you to go to sleep so that the muslim in you can be awake. Just what I said. What you termed "mistake" is a wifeless husband and motherless todlers. The 'mistake' was encouraged by the Oustass and islamic clerics and the kids were only repeating what they've seen adults do before. Dont you know 'kids' are very impressionable, whether good kids or the 'young cows' you have up north, they will always be influenced by the adults and their teachings. |
Easter Week Days Nights@blabs787, This is why the concensus on this forum is that you are not a very brilliant mind; but we'll indulge you a little longer, probably and God-willing the information you've received will help you. 3 days and 3 nights were fulfilled literally however difficult it is for your mind to comprehend it. I did not day he was put in the tomb on thursday night. In the following references Jesus stated that "After three days, I will rise again." (Matt 16:21; Matt 17:23; Matt 20:19; Matt 26:61; Mark 8:31; Mark 10:34; Luke 9:22; Luke 13:33; Luke 24:6-7; John 2:19) In all this passage, Jesus affirmed that in three days I will rise again, and he alluded to it by using the sign of Jonah as euphemism in a parable. What I gave you is how this was fulfilled by jewish traditional and cultural timing and language. In your usual simplistic reasoning, you are looking for mathematical calculation. Now wonder you are trying to smuggle allah and muhammed into the bible. God forbid!! |
,,,,,,,,,,,that his eye was wounded at Badr and that its pupil came down on his cheekbone. They were about to slice it off, but asked the Messenger of God (SAAS) who said they should not do this. He then said a prayer for him, covering his cheek with his palm. And later you could not tell which of his eyes had been struck!” ![]() @blabs787, Haba!! Alhaji; softly softly oh!! Is this the sort of 'Quranic miracles' you want to show in support of your false claims. I thought you'll do better. In the anatomy of the eye, do you know what is called the 'pupil'? That is the "space" or "hole" in the centre of the Iris, through which light rays enter into the eye. So, how can a "space" come down on his cheekbone? Olodo! ![]() I have attached an annotated diagram of the eye to show you what is called the "pupil"; that your quran is a book of fallasies; only an indolent mind will believe what you wrote. See the picture:
|
Now, having shed light on the origin of Easter, I am now directing the below questions to Christian brothers and sisters here to explain them to us.@blabs787, Congratulations; finally you've given birth to your long-awaited question on the 'fulfillment of the prophecy of Jonah. Is this your best shot? How woeful!!!You "shed light" indeed by trying to discredit the celebration of the "death, burial and ressurection of Jesus Christ" with your typical copy and paste fantasy stories of Greco-Roman paganism; triangulated with statements of another idol called 'allah'. Is allah not really confused? Because in Sura 4:157, 'allah' stated that Jesus was not crucified, but later allah said in the same passage (which you did not write) that 'it' (i.e. allah) made Simon to take up the 'form' or 'appearance' of Jesus, and that it was Simon that was crucified and not Jesus. I hope you saw that in your Quran!! Dont you see that the idol called 'allah' knows that the crusifixion of Jesus Christ is too powerful to be denied, hence "it" is trying to give an alternative explanation of the crusifixion. That is the trade-mark of the devil, always trying to give "alternatives to the truth"; which is why the devil is called the "deceiver." As such, you can see that the idol called 'allah' is nothing other than one of the agents of the devil. Now on the prophecy of Jonah: This has confused muslims for ages; and not only muslims but other sceptics also. To you muslims, Friday to Sunday morning is not up to three days, but just 2 days, as such the prophecy about the sign of Jonah is not right, abi? Unfortunately, this is due to blatant ignorance. In Isreal, up till this moment, the "Jewish" tradition or cultural timing is that: "a new day starts at sundown". As such, the Friday (by Greek custom) of crusifixion actually started at sundown of preceeding Thursday, up to sundown friday i.e. Day 1!. Day 2 started at sundown friday up to sundown saturday; and Day 3 started at sundown saturday. So, do you see now that Jesus in his prophecy to the Jews of Israel will definitely use the jewish description of day since that is the culturally understaood and accepted way. But you have decided to interprete it using the greek calendar days. See what ignorance does. ![]() |
Isn't that silly! Now whether they were black people, 'some' or all jews, chinese, mullato or whatever, what kind of god will command his prophet to 'compare black people to satan'?; and that "if a black man comes to you, his heart is more gross than a donkey's." From a supposed angel of god, right?