₦airaland Forum

ijebosb:
Repeat that.
My mates(one, who was just here) are sending their kids who are legacies to IVY Leagues schools and paying in Dollars from Lagos.
Now ask yourself, how many of your mates are sending their kids who are legacies to Ivy Leagues schools in the US and can afford to pay $90,000 a year in Dollars from Nigeria.
Let me help you with that, 0. It would be 0. Because, like attracts like. And you're a BUM.

I think you missed the headline.

100, 2000, you may never know. Stop talking about your mates, talk about you.

You are almost 50, yet all you do is to talk about your ex(s) and your imaginary girlfriend in Nigeria who has butlers and cook yet you spend nights sleeping at your boys couch sending his daughter to uni because you want to save little change 😂

ijebosb:
Yes, you and your besties, Bemeruca and Basilico have confirmed me to be a dunce.
Well said. Repeat that to yourself.
I am the dunce with two degrees from schools you nor your children will ever sniff.
Show me your friends and I'll show you who you are.

Obrigardo is your friend 😂😂😂

raumdeuter:
You have been confirmed to be a dunce multiple times

Ivy League degree indeed. I will expect anyone with such to write better than a 3rd grader

His mates with Ivy League degrees are sending their kids to Ivy League schools from Lagos. Yet he is here bragging about his boy sending his kid away while he has nothing. This guy is almost 50 years old

ijebosb:
Fam, I have an Ivy league degree.
What do you have?

Keep this on topics where you have a chance.

Per usual 😂 yet almost everyone has called you stupid and dumb 🤣🤣

ijebosb:
I did read it and I did understand it. I was asking if you did.
Because it sounds like a pretty stupid list of pretty debatable issues.
You clearly seem not understand what a fact check is.
Stop outsourcing your thought to random propagandists.

Harvard guys.
How is it debatable? Those are debunked lies the ABC hosts refused to fact check. How are you even disagreeing with this?

The bold is what happens when you watch the debate on leftist tweets instead of the actual debate.

ijebosb:
Go rest. Everytime you run your mouth here it ends up in you lying trying not to look stupid. Which makes you look even stupider. Why do you think this time will be any different?.
Go work on your Canadian asylum application, or wherever you're trying to seek asylum now.
Us matters don't concern you for you do be devoting your life and soul to it.

Your brain is now stuck in a loop 😂 per usual

IjeBos:
Go rest. Everytime you run your mouth here it ends up in you lying trying not to look stupid. Which makes you look even stupider.
Go work on your Canadian asylum application, or wherever you're trying to seek asylum now.
Us matters don't concern you for you do be devoting your life and soul to it.

Lmao, so you could not prove what I am saying wrong?
The US is spending close to 300 million per day in Ukraine for less than a quarter of the equipments they were getting in Afghanistan. Prove me wrong

Ibime:
3 Vs 1 is losers nonsense

He was talking so much nonsense about cats, dogs and abortion after birth. Media have a duty to set the record straight. Setting record straight on a mad man for the benefit of the public is not taking sides

He was even handed an alley hoop with the first question on economy, kicking off on his strong point. If they started off on abortion, I will know it was 3 Vs 1

Trump had all the ammunition that matters - Economy, Immigration and Afghanistan withdrawal and still lost the debate, Kamala didn't have much to work with except abortion and still won. If you give any reasonable politician Trumps strong points, it would have been a whitewash

😂😂

Kamel la wants a second debate. It is safe to assume she is behind in their internal polls.

I'd say trump sets the stage at fox news or they should use a town hall setting and call megyn Kelly and someone from CNN to do the 2nd debate

PDPGuy:
Now, about 4.5 million individuals are behind on their mortgage payments, and over 5 million individuals are behind on their rent payments 🙆🏾

How will kamala fix this she did not answer.

IjeBos:
300 million a day is not 3.6 billion dollars a year. Go back to school.

Oga they are spending more in Ukraine than Afghanistan. Logistics, equipment, bombs, planes, factor all these, If they give all this equipments they had in Afghanistan to Ukraine, Ukraine would be at Moscow today.

They are spending billions for less in Ukraine.

IjeBos:
1.) Why invade when you could just get Trump to destabilize NATO and then have Trump let you take Ukraine, once he's reelected.
2.) The US was spending 300 million a day in Afghanistan. Add that up in 1 year and compare that to what we "gave" Ukraine.
3.) We don't really give Ukraine a lot of actual cash (we do give some). We give them money to buy US weapons or supplies which then also supports the economy on those areas where the factories are located in the US. And they tend to be Republican areas.
Also we give them old weapons which we would have to spend money destroying anyhow. And there is actual value in seeing how our weapons work "in combat".
4.) Ukraine is not the US. We are basically hiring an army (Ukraine) to fight Russia and advance our interests while US troops stay safe. Sounds evil, but that is what Big boys do on the world state.

Another gobbledegook from you. NATO became stronger under Trump.
If he is destabilizing NATO and a pal with Putin, isn't that the right time to invade? Use some brain cells

By your figures 3.6 billion a year. War started in 2022 the US has spent more than 200 billion.

It's simple maths. By this rate, they are outspending Afghanistan and it was the US's war not another nation.

IjeBos:
You don't own stock, so you probably don't understand stocks go up and down daily. Lol.
You spend a lot of time here interjecting yourself into shit you have 0 clue on.
It may help you if you had actually stepped foot in the US.

You magically know I don't own stocks. This is how naive you are. Stupid day in day out.

IjeBos:
It actually does. A study was done that says that if he had just invested the money his father gave him and did nothing else, he would have had more money than he had pre-Presidency. Obviously he made a ton of money post Presidency. Esp. this last year on his Truth social.

He was bankrupt is irrelevant. He has many employees including pilots working for him.

IjeBos:
I am satisfied.
You do understand Russia is prolonging the way because they think they will get a favorable ending when Trump is elected?
And to be honest, Ukraine is hurting Russia with no loss of US life and not tons of US money spent.
The US is also testing US weapons and learning a lot about drone warfare.
I mean...

Bullshit is the only stuff that comes out of your mouth lol. Why not invade when trump was president then?

No tons of US money was spent. You be mumu lol.

They are hurting Russia, Ukraine is destroyed with hundreds of thousands dead and you are saying they are hurting Russia.

IjeBos:
Trump's truth social stock is a tell tale of how people thought he did last night.

Before the debate they reported this, after the debate they are spewing the same crap. Well, Bidenomics

basilico:
The cat especially..Looks like it was a planned moment .They probably knew from inside sources that Trump would raise the cats and dog claim, Taylor Swift with her gazillion social media followers didn't definitely decide yesterday after the debate .
The same Taylor Swift who had to cancel a show in Vienna over a planned ISIS tertor attack two weeks ago.

She was taking jab at Vance for his statement about childless cat ladies. His statement spot on

basilico:
Trump called into fox and said the ABC licence should be taken away from them.
Honestly what abc did was blatant election interference.
Earlier a report on David Muir show since June showed Trump had 93% negative spin while Kamala had 100% positive spin.
In other words Trump was in the lions den last night.
They were well prepared for the cats and dogs claim,Kamala quickly quipped raising questions on whether the three had rehearsed the gotcha moment

Megyn Kelly statement on the ABC sacrilege - I couldn't find a better word.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2024/09/11/megyn_kelly_im_ashamed_of_the_debate_moderators_at_abc_news.html


See how yahoo frames His call for ABC licence.

He should relax. He should not be agreeing to debates likes this knowing how the network will be towards him.

To take it and come out later to say their licence should be taken sounds like kamala harris

LordAdam16:
Not surprising.

Dude transformed into an emergency conspiracy theorist.

-Lord

The childless cat lady might help convince the gullible.
The timing is preplanned

LordAdam16:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/some-undecided-voters-not-convinced-by-harris-after-debate-with-trump

It's Reuters m*ron!
REUTERS.

Half thought Harris was vague. 6 of 10 undecideds lean Trump after watching the debate.

-Lord

Just so you know they have killed the link

LordAdam16:
Ije, this is not about me.

I'm simply sharing what undecideds told REUTERS.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/some-undecided-voters-not-convinced-by-harris-after-debate-with-trump

Now you're trying to be a conspiracy theorist. That's the tag you use when I contest things.

-Lord

It is not negative towards Trump so IjeBos, whose body is powered by hatred, will IjeBos.

IjeBos:
You do know how online push polls work right.
I'm sure some Russian phone banks spent all night answering these polls to give a Trump a heads up to manipulate idiots like you who either didn't watch the debate or want to gaslight others.
You're an idiot as are most Republicans in this thread.
Trump lost and gaslighting everyone with obvious bullshit makes you look like the idiot and liar you are.

Leak your wounds. It is not negative towards trump which is all you care about.

LordAdam16:
The glaring gang-up turned off some people.

Like sure your strategy worked because your opponent has Jupiter-sized ego, but the moderators were clearly in the tank for you.
Even Dana Bash during her interview pressed her multiple times when she avoided a question. ABC refused to fact-check her.

-Lord

This was what I expected. The debate could have been a home run for her given her buddies are the moderators on a network that spew 80% favorable coverage of her and 95% negative coverage of Trump, yet she is losing voters based on the economy on CNN poll.

IjeBos:
So you are saying a DEI candidate trashed the former President you worship.
Not sure that says much about Trump.

so much trashing

LordAdam16:
They asked her if she thinks Americans are better off under her than 4 years ago under Trump and her answer segued into Trump being boring.

Trump missed a lot of easy layups.
He is fortunate their records are stark and American swing state voters are discerning.

Reuters did a follow-up of undecideds. Most leaned Trump. Half said Harris was vague. I can bet that most thought Harris won the debate.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/some-undecided-voters-not-convinced-by-harris-after-debate-with-trump

Kudos to Harris for executing her plan. But her plan did not entail distancing herself from Biden. She did not sufficiently answer why she hadn't done the things she was talking about. And many saw her baiting Trump as a cheap trick to avoid getting in the weeds about her policies.

-Lord

NYT

swaggerific:
Elected by the people of California. Google is free. Use it to know how AGs and DAs are confirmed in California. DEI how?

is California a country?

CNN focus group

CNN: "What did you see that brought you to a conclusion?"

UNDECIDED VOTER: "When facts come to facts, my life was better when Trump was in office." pic.twitter.com/DOfUsbFgGP

— Brigitte Gabriel (@ACTBrigitte) September 11, 2024

armyofone:
She did well tonight for undecided and independent people like me and you good enough for people like you who were waiting for a good debate.

What is left for you not to go vote for her ? Nothing except you are not happy she is a woman

I won't be able to vote. I don't want them to deport me. you don't bite the hands that feed you

swaggerific:
Not true. She is there because she was elected by the American people. She was AG because the people of California voted for her

elected by who?
she is there because of DEI. She was not elected ask Newsome

basilico:
Really the whole debate was about letting her run wild on vague promises and going for the jugular on Trump. I commented long before the debate was over that he wasn't answering the questions as he should have, they fact checked closed the topic and moved on.
That was no debate.

it was glaring. we can also assume she knows every question that will be asked

armyofone:
Describe better women oh Bemeruca.

Tulsi

armyofone:
I was like what is he talking about.

So all over the place and can't answer questions as asked. His closing remarks were something else.

I tell you if he wins it is because of they don't want a "woman" president.

don't go this route. She is the VP because she is a woman, she is the presidential nominee because she is a woman. if she loses it is because she is a bad choice. there are better women out there. kamela is not it.