BERNIMOORE's Posts
Nairaland Forum › BERNIMOORE's Profile › BERNIMOORE's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 (of 162 pages)
[size=18pt]sorry 'e'was placed, because i want to post after the question,but fell behind the answer and pasted after your post, because i want you to see it after your post if you remove without putting a word like like 'e' or any letter it will not post.[/size] i have gone to the post and observe so you can see the statements 'not before again but after your post to match your question in that thread' THE STATEMENT STILL POSTED STILL AGREES WITH MY STAND , THAT i support the fact that jesus is the son of God' but you have NOT ESTABLISH A STATEMENT THAT I EVER DENIED AND LATER REMOVED |
benalvino: again you have shown your ignorance...sorry 'e'was placed, because i want to post after the question,but fell behind the answer and pasted after your post, because i want you to see it after your post if you remove without putting a word like like 'e' or any letter it will not post. i have gone to the post and observe so you can see the statements 'not before again but after your post to match your question in that thread' THE STATEMENT STILL POSTED STILL AGREES WITH MY STAND , THAT i support the fact that jesus is the son of God' but you have NOT ESTABLISH A STATEMENT THAT I EVER DENIED AND LATER REMOVED |
benalvino: as y'all can see the claims victory meaning he is coming here to win argument or whatever... i never come to compete and i never knew you were competing with me and more over it is only you who have said you won and no body said or no one was keeping scores. i know your friend truthislight will easily say you won...speculation is an offence for you, do you know? i stand a better chance of winning if my primary motive is to prove that my reputation was harmed in your speculation, rather than suing for monetary damages, vengeance or stopping you from republishing the defamatory statements. it was a contempt, A lawsuit might actually be establish on the defamatory speculations. A Libel lawsuit I Can put my counsel on alert, immidiately i hunt your true person |
benalvino: HAHAHAHA bernimoore you have removed your post that makes me realize you did not understand what translate and interpret means... and yet you keep saying thishow does [, and "e", becomes a statement? you suck ![]() you mean that i should wait for a whole day when im less busy to type on a microsoft word which would and certify all words properly before i post? show me a statement i have ADMITTED BEFORE, BUT LATER DENIED, AND THEN WITHDRAWN, im sure you are going to show symbols or letters, Anofia! and you still continue in your blunder that agellos is a hebrew word in your dictionary,EWU like you ![]() so |
benalvino: Lol i am still laughing about Bernimoore saying I am hurt because from his behavior he joins nairaland to hurt people... He always brag about making someone looks stupid especially how he brags about making olagbedu look stupid concerning deeperlife thing. Now he is the one who is looking stupid because you just dealing with someone who dont care. lol...bolded above makes me laugh ![]() who shamed me? nobody, go to all the links that i have participated, including yours, i won them all! can you remember the thread firstborn first created that you OP, remember those words in bold that you wrote, that ;'YOU(BERNIMOORE)WON EVEN THOUGH'.... its a testimony on my part, you want me to quote the page, then deny first. i have solid evidences about olaadegbu, but you dont have one against me you admit speculating me as barrister, that alone is INVALID! NO PROOF. you are yet to give a solid one! I have been mistaken severally on this but i still stand by what i have earlier said. nairaland allows speculations, but speculating another person on my person is an offence, and like i said a crime, and libelious. i will continue, but not until i trash every bit of these so that others will see my stand. |
benalvino: you alter your post...you disappointed me, i thought you would show us how i withdrawn a statement that i have admitted before but later denied and delete, which you might have captured but to my disappointment it was a typo error, whichnairaland in their discretion provides facilities to amend, where is the crime here? |
Another reason why you are barrister and a jehovah's witness... Reason because if you do something like that why will I take your words that you are not barrister and not a witness ?you are really trying hard to merge me with JWS based on speculation as you have admitted, but no im not a jw, go and sort out your issues with them. while i continue to oppose every false teaching using valid evidences from any source including some of JW teachings. take that to the bank from me again |
benalvino: lol am hurt? hahahaahahaha very funny.[size=14pt]can you show me statements that i have made before to butress a point but later denied it, after withrawal? other than adding details(allowed by the nairaland), or typo errors corrected? show it now, or forever be quiet im waiting, [/size] |
[size=14pt]since i did not withdraw my full statement, typogriphical errors can be ammended.ok come up with another one, i knew that you are hurt, you said that i made you look silly, you want me to start digging your typo errrors? if i start with you the thread will be derailed, but i may not hesitate[/size] |
benalvino: If y'all go up the thread like page 3 and 4 you will notice that bernimoore is deleting his post by adding "." or "]" as you can see he is not a sincere person and a pretender... Lol you are a big liar by that act because you are trying to cover up your trace.sorry, there is nothing wrong in adding to your statements, as long as the Nairaland allows that! but If someone is banned, he dare not use another Id which im still waiting for you to prove ok? |
benalvino: NAaa you are barrister...does he know me from Adam? do you ask? he doesnt! |
[b]benalvino:[/b]Its not a bad thing but I say you are one of them based on every single thing you believe comes from them... Michael the archangel etc... |
[size=14pt]yet, based on speculation you admitted above, you still went ahead to write this below;[/size] And I still insist you are one of them...You use to be barrister when asked you lied you are not him.. Then later said he is your brother...and since you speculate , hear me again, and [size=18pt]it is me that can tell who i am[/size] Barrister is my brother, ok? im a different person, im bernimoore you can take this to the bank from me |
benalvino: [size=18pt]one I do not know you[/size]...thank you for the bolded in summary you speculate! do you know it is a crime to speculate and present it as a fact of evidence? a contempt to mine fundamentals of human right, maybe you dont know |
benalvino: Ya we go again... Now you are accusing me of Making a meal out of it or you are the one who push me to point it out?hello, you have not answered my question pls state it clearly, do you know me from adam? have i ever admit to be A JW to you, or any person? then why speculate without proof? then, is it wrong or a crime to support the JWS? |
You based your speculation on the bolded below; benalvino: no excuse you can bring... nothing gives me the avenue to twist besides if you know it will give me an avenue to twist you wont do it... you are person who is trying to show off that he is kool or something and guess what, i am not making a big deal out of it... it is you who comes here trying to build reputation from nairaland... funny thing is that people dont even know you in real life.i showed you a write up by a non jehovah's witness on this issue, RAY FOUCHER on the other tread, who held same belief on angels, do you aknowledge that? then, why forcing JW on me? anyway i still stand by my earlier affirmations. |
benalvino: Lol yes a blunder it was suppose to read the Greek not Hebrew.. Are you happy? Should we move on?Happy? im always happy, you were trying to make a meal out of what you are equally guilty of.time is nt sufficient for one to make neccesary editing because you are busy, you type at work, at home in your car, its normal that you post what you dont really mean, but accompanying sentences around it will show your true intention, but then you start saying that im denying my religion, pls state it clearly, do you know me from adam? have i ever admit to be A JW to you, or any person? then why speculate without proof? then, is it wrong or a crime to support the JWS? |
benalvino: @bernimoor ok lets go into meaningful discussion now... so we can get to somewhere. i am done trolling.in your post above; [size=14pt]see YOUR BLUNDER BOLDED ABOVE IN YOUR QUOTE, I NEVER BRAG ABOUT THAT[/size] You confuse yourself saying Agellos is a hebrew word, while it is a greek word, CONFIRM PLS, SO THAT I CAN MAKE A MEAL OUT OF THAT agellos is a greek word for angel malawk is also a hebrew word for angel |
this is my original post below; show me the blunder, especially when it applies to a particular case; [quote author=benalvino] benalvino: bernimoore; what you are saying is that, Goat was created as Ewu first before it becomes animal, are you not repeating same thing that 'goat was created as Ewu first' is goat not the same Ewu? does it makes sense?[size=18pt] althouth it is a form of 'code mixing' in the 'comm. in Eng' but it does not make sense if applied in this case.[/size] if you can drop your pride and reason, it will be better! it is hard to admit, but i dont see any joy jumping up for showing you what you ough to have aknowledgebolded above, i aknowledged that 'althouth it is a form of 'code mixing' yes, i later realised that i shouldnt have put 'not translated' because it will give an impression that im nullifying 'translate outrightly' because i was typing fast and could not notice or edit fast. but my examples shows what i mean. my emphasis is 'on interpretations' I actually 'personalised' it by saying 'but it does not make sense if applied in this case' in that same quote you posted, but you did not capture it along |
benalvino: the funny thing is the first time you come and stated that i added "And" looking for an excuse while you and me know that a,b,c is same as a and b and c....which blunder? for God sake, i knew it will give you an avenue to twist and twist thats why i dont want to go further on that. |
(permission from the op pls) bolded below are your earlier stand! benalvino: malak: a messenger benalvino: olodo... lolyou see your life? why changing it now? Now tell us the difference between malawk and Agellos? now, |
benalvino: this is a good example that supports me... I told you aggelos translate into 2 types of words... one is an angel and the other is a messenger...you are changing issues now too bad!, [size=14pt]if not show me the difference between agellos and malawk? now, do it now,[/size] |
benalvino: this is one habit of you i know... you look for excuse to object too much... i did not see this before...yes, a valid excuse, you would have said that earlier, your impression was that you said Aggellos and malawk are not same, true or false? you further said that while agellos is used directly for only angels was that they are 'in angel's form' first before 'messenger' and that Malawk directly apply to human messenger Benalvino:aggelos translate as: an angel and messenger... check the strongyou cant change this ![]() |
benalvino: haven said the above... me and you know what we are not spirits... therefore we are not angels... we are different from them.can you see the bolded? we have spirit form and phisical form(human) there is NOTHING like 'angels form', but[b] spirit angel[/b], the word Angel is 'to dispatch' a verb, check that too. God too is spirit [size=18pt]angels are in the same spiritual form of God, but not equal with God[/size] |
check strong lexicons and tell us what you see! (Luke 7:24) "And when the messengers (aggelos) of John were departed, he began to speak unto the people concerning John, What went ye out into the wilderness for to see? A reed shaken with the wind?" so john the baptist, (Matt 11:10) and his messengers are agellos; angel first, and messenger so, they are in angelic form, abi agellos! maybe you can clearly see now that malawk was not used here for them as humans but your preffered agellos which you said means angel form first, then messenger |
benalvino: nope... i disagree... aggelos is translated from greek to english as an angel, messenger.bolded above is your addition, you added 'and' see it from your own defination of angel! below; aggelos: an angel, messenger Original Word: ἄγγελος, ου, ὁ Part of Speech: Noun, Masculine Transliteration: aggelos Phonetic Spelling: (ang'-el-os) Short Definition:[size=18pt] an angel, messenger[/size] an angel, messenger[/quote] interpretation is saying the meaning of something... like a word... translation is changing it from one language to another...im not trying to be sarcastic! at all by using ewu, im not even an ibo man,ok. i dont need to do that, interpret and translations may lead us to or distract if we steered more on them,i would have loved to still prove them, but maybe we should now focus on the original meaning of agellos, to save distraction you admitted that agellos translates Angel first, as it was put in your reference dictionary, against malawk which translates directly to messenger, which means agellos cant be used for humans but balawk can be used for humans, is nt it? since you urge me to use strong lexicon; it will interest you that agellos was used for a human (john the baptist) while jesus was speaking of john mathew 11:10 "For this is he (John the Baptist), of whom it is written, Behold, I send my messenger (aggelos) before thy face, which shall prepare thy way before thee." (Matt 11:10) G32 ἄγγελος aggelos ang'-el-os From ἀγγέλλω aggellō ; a messenger ; especially an angel ; by implication a pastor: - {angel} messenger. |
] |
e |
Benalvino bernimoore:isaiah was sent a seraphim, the seraphim went to the alter, use tongs to pick a live coal, and also with a message from Godin view of the imformation above, in isaiah 6:6 are seraphim 'confined to Gods throne' or also are beign sent on errands? answer |
Benalvino: saraphims are not messengers they are care takers of God's throne..is it according to Benalvino, or according to the bible, because in benalvino's opinion,saraphims are not messengers benalvino, i knew you are only acting based on the extent you know, yet you want to remain STANGNANT, who told you that the duty of seraphims is limited only to Gods throne? isaiah was sent a seraphim, the seraphim went to the alter, use tongs to pick a live coal, and also with a message from God isaiah 6:6 [size=14pt]6 Then one of the seraphim flew to me with a live coal in his hand, which he had taken with tongs from the altar. [/size]7 With it he touched my mouth and said, “See, this has touched your lips; your guilt is taken away and your sin atoned for.” [size=14pt]the seraphim here no doubt carried on an assignment designated for him as a messenger [/size] Again I have define angel for you else where I want you to cut long story short...what stops you from defining angel 'on this thread, why elsewhere, why not respect people on the thread by willingly define it, until i lifted it from other tread where you had contradicting opinion on your defination? Was the world subjected to angel? Yes or no. Is Satan a messenger?you admit that satan is an angel benalvino(m):see your defination below; benalvino: [size=18pt]malak:[/size] a messengermessenger! ok? so the issue of messenger is solved in your defination! bolded above in your post benalvino(m)[/b]So the question is who is Satan a messenger to?[b]the point needed is answered in your defination! the issue of who satan is messenger to is out of this! you can create a thread for that, but at least for now, i have establish satan, and angels using your own defination that he is a messenger. |
[quote author=benalvino] Hahahaha... Maybe you can't answer the simple yes or no question. Just answer it let the argument close.i have given detail answer up there, scrol up you will need to realize that the angels are what they are regardless of them being messengers or not...according to where? your opinion? you think we are here to swallow what you just opined? common, show a bible principle that says that, and not what you jush gush out let me see... Satan a created angel a messenger of God... turns rebellious and now he is not a messenger to God and not a messenger to any thing i know of... yet he never stops being an angel.CBB, Confussion break bones ![]() this will show you that the word angel means two things one it is their nature... two it is a messenger.in your confused state, you forced an opinion outside the bible and even your own defination, aggelos: an angel, [size=18pt]messenger[/size]in your confused state you opined, [/b]but [b]the written defination was clear and even bold enough without using big lenses ![]() when humans like a prophet dies... they don't become an angel. yes their spirit goes to God but angels are a spiritual nature of servants.according to the book of benalvino, not the bible! i hope you get where am coming from...we are still on the defination of angels, you will learn to keep stages in arguments, ok? "the statement Jesus as an archangel him self will use the voice of an archangel"this is from another thread, a disrespect to others following, you want to jump stages, i hope you dont do this in banks, how do you cope with those embarrasements? irrelevant post for now, i have other verses to show on that, but let us first establish duly the defination of angels,using the bible and not your opinion ok? |
benalvino: Hahahaha sign of respect... You are still funny. Because you are pretending... The first time you post a link from my thread you didn't ask for permission.Did i ever post a nairaland link on your thread? or a link about a previous discussion on some issues no!, thats what im talking about the link i posted on your thread demand surprise, as it expose your DUBBING of someone else work WORD FOR WORD and you even went ahead to remove the name of the author and pose it as yours. and i showed you, i wouldnt want to inform you so that you adjust. Benalvino: saraphims are not messengers they are care takers of God's throne..is it according to Benalvino, or according to the bible, because in benalvino's opinion,saraphims are not messengers benalvino, i knew you are only acting based on the extent you know, yet you want to remain STANGNANT, who told you that the duty of seraphims is limited only to Gods throne? isaiah was sent a seraphim, the seraphim went to the alter, use tongs to pick a live coal, and also with a message from God [size=14pt]6 Then one of the seraphim flew to me with a live coal in his hand, which he had taken with tongs from the altar. [/size]7 With it he touched my mouth and said, “See, this has touched your lips; your guilt is taken away and your sin atoned for.” [size=14pt]the seraphim here no doubt carried on an assignment designated for him as a messenger [/size] Again I have define angel for you else where I want you to cut long story short...what stops you from defining angel 'on this thread, why elsewhere, why not respect people on the thread by willingly define it, until i lifted it from other tread where you had contradicting opinion on your defination? Was the world subjected to angel? Yes or no. Is Satan a messenger?you admit that satan is an angel benalvino(m):see your defination below; benalvino: [size=18pt]malak:[/size] a messengermessenger! ok? so the issue of messenger is solved in your defination! bolded above in your post benalvino(m)[/b]So the question is who is Satan a messenger to?[b]the point needed is answered in your defination! the issue of who satan is messenger to is out of this! you can create a thread for that, but at least for now, i have establish satan, and angels using your own defination that he is a messenger. Again you thought I contradict my self but nope... The word Malawk has 2 translation... There are many words like that in the bible Hebrew or Greek.where are the two translations? and show me the first translations you are talking about? which is the primary translation! im waiting look up messenger and angel to understand. [size=14pt]you can see i have answered all your question! [/size] |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 (of 162 pages)
