BERNIMOORE's Posts
Nairaland Forum › BERNIMOORE's Profile › BERNIMOORE's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 (of 162 pages)
AH! even b4 i said anything you are rendered Clueless! poor you benalvino ![]() |
benalvino: Lol frosbel please also permit him to use the toilet... Very funny...oh you think its funny, it is a normal cortesy and a sign of respect to engage the permission of the OP before you post another topic from another thread, or even vent anger you incure during the torment you experienced on the 'firstborn thread' you lack all the training, abi! why dont you deny the tagged 1(#h) where you obviously contradict your own defination of angel Angels are of different classes like saraphims.you like jumping stages, you have not define angel on this thread,except the one i helped you to lift which you cannot deny, it is important, or should we live the defination i lifted for you in 1(#h), if you dont contend it then it stands. then we move to next, Are the saraphims messengers?are saraphims not messengers, if not tell us! |
Joagbaje: Angels are servants, we have spiritual angels ,and human angelsso far this is the defination we have defined by someone on the thread without hesitation, do we all agree? if there is any objection, can it be raised now? |
just one of the reason benalvino was qualified with these 5 among others (1)a liar/(2)deceitful (3)illogical and (4)unreasonable (5)directionless . |
benalvino frosbel, pls permit me to quote what benalvino earlier said that he had defined, of which he lied! to have adressed, but rather, he made a criminal and forceful denial of HIS OWN defination below; he claimed that i defined angel on page 31 of the tread, but it was on page 27, he tried to twist everything, i knew that so i tagged it (1#h) https://www.nairaland.com/1318212/firstborn-does-it-mean-first/27#16771512 its here, if you cant open the thread; how can a normal person quote these below, and turn back to deny it is a misery! can other people help me to see it, benalvino: [size=18pt]malak:[/size] a messengerAfter the defination supplied above by benalvino's post, he turned round to still deny the meaning in his post below; Benalvino:you making your self look more and more desperate... keep trying see bolded from your own quote! im laughing here! are you reffering to the pronouciaion of malawk and angellos that they dont sound same way? is it neccesary, what common sense are you talking? do you need big lenses? even in your quote above, you denied the obvious is a shame! you see what trinity doctrine has caused you, a virus, i told you to go back to school, you dont even know your left from right, you are confused, go take a rest...im tagging this posts of contradiction of yours[size=18pt] 1(#h)[/size]Now where have i made a mistake, he cant point it out! |
truthislight: ^^^CHAI! this is a digrace to you benal. Again, the person you refered to has denied you and[b] even qualifying you with 5 good characters worth thinking [/b]of,only if you are the reasonable type. (bolded above) is not good if you are to be taken seriously. |
frosbel pls define an Angel so that we can build from that, thanks |
benalvino: You are asking me a question I have already answered before. Its not the first time we are on this so stop acting like its new between you and I.step by step, ok, maybe you wait till we build the topic to that stage, we want to identify 'the subject matter' who is an Angel. so wait for some other honest people who can define it. you would have defined Angel since but like i said earlier, you cant, before we move unto who is, and who is not, thats logical, [/b]you came into a thread to show how pained you are when i rubbed your face on the mud of lies by codding them. dont derail another man's thread ok? im not a JW, and you are yet to prove it, i dont need to change my i.d, that someone speculate that the way i post resembles another persons of which i said is my brother, was it not me that refer true2God to that same site? and how does that become a proof? i dont know! how it concerns what an angel was, i dont know but rather your failure to simply define who angels are, it doesnt take some other people time to do that. [b]defending part of jw teaching which i feel also correspond with ray foucher who is not JW does not make me one, but you are pained, sorry. i might hurt you more, but people will get bored. did you ever admit that you are a Jehovahs witnesses? answer that now. |
benalvino: I have answered this many times... So I want you to answer the simple yes or no question first... You and I know that you answering that question will end the argument instantly[size=14pt]you jump into a new thread and said you have already answered a question? where sir, thats strange![/size] im not aware of that, maybe you can respect others and duly state who angels are ON THIS THREAD, not for my sake.ok? but im sure you may not ![]() |
lie no 1, benalvino: You are a jehovah's witness... Simple as that. [size=18pt]And yes you admit it am in a bus travelling atm so I can't go to my thread now to show you.[/size]you wanted to jokinkly force that assertion! [size=18pt]im NOT a JW![/size] if you have issues with them go and solve it out! im tagging this (2#a) you think its a joke! 'a bus travelling atm'[/i]really, and [i]'you can't go to my thread now to show me' when we never saw each other from Adam, lie no 2 But remember when I showed you the contradiction from watchtower and the way you react... Supporting them and asking me to give you page number so you can check from your watchtower cd rom.you did not show any contradiction! all what you did was to quote them 'out of context' to promote a wrong view about them, up till now you could not provide the 'second magazine' where you lied that they were reffering to jesus as plural 'angels' but rather 'because they might have spoken about the fallen angels that were not sent by God but came to manufacture bodies for themselves, they affirm that 'God did not send angels'(fallen angels) but 'his son' you, like the devil does, remove their comments from several contexes of original paragraphs and criminally put them together in another concorted form to fan sentiment towards them and you posed it as 'contradiction' https://www.nairaland.com/1318212/firstborn-does-it-mean-first/29 did i tell you that i have thier cd rom? did nt you even admit that you are 'more Jehovahs Witnesses' ? so, what stops me from defending them(jw) if (some) of their argument are in line with what i reseached? if you are honest i copied a link of where i got convinced about the Angel issue, by RAY FOUCHER, isn'nt it? [size=18pt]who is an angel? thats the question[/size] |
the question is still at the defination level, [size=18pt]who is an angel?[/size] you cant defend what you dont duly know, many blindly say different things about angels,as if they eat together and stay in the same apartment but dont even know who angel was again; [size=18pt]who is an angel?[/size] you will be surprised that from the defination, angel are NOT what many thought they are. |
benalvino: I know your religion taught you Jesus is an angel... They went further to say he is Michael the archangel... So lets cut long story short...1, what is my religion? and add your evidence where i admit such, and not 'as you think' which i have corrected you but you still dont adjust, if not you cant escape beign tagged again for this 'FORCEFULL IMPOSITION' |
Rossikk: It's funny isn't it? You actually have grown men with university degrees believing this stuff. Including that a man rose up before onlookers and 'ascended up into heaven', ''heaven'' of course being ''up in the sky'', ''somewhere''.now that the people are resolved to live their life in that way, whats your own problem? you think to make mere insult and wasting your time here is the solution, why not find other things to do with your time? you cant contribute positively to the thread, and yet cyrex cant stop frustrating himself but still read the bible, cant you guys get your aAss off the tread as you can see, you are irrelevant to the thread, at best you are ignored or even when one met you on the road, should treat you like an electric pole or dry tree. |
Benalvino, i knew that the VENOM of the last long argument on this issue i had with you still remain in you and causing you pain, sorry here is the link again below; https://www.nairaland.com/1318212/firstborn-does-it-mean-first/31 your tricks and lies were exposed, even your forgeries were captured and saved duly, as our discussion goes i will be throwing them on your face. i deliberately coded your blushes. so that you cant deny them or someone taking you serious. go back to the Topic, as we want to build the topic from defination the op was making a refference to 'one' singular person while you are making a case for 'plural' persons 'Angels' |
benalvino: keep quiet i beg you... show us verse jesus was called michael or michael was called jesus or jesus is an archangel.that was RUDE!, YOUR APPROACH was very rude!, besides, im replying someone whom i quoted his post, cant you be honest to observe courtesy? we are still on the defination of an angel, you are the one who first mention micheal here, you are jumping exegical holes like an antelop beign pursued by a frustrated hunter ![]() |
Joagbaje: The word means "minister " or messenger . So a christian minister who serves is an angel in this sense . It also means pastor .why would paul refer to Jesus 'as an angel of God'? or why would paul gave a parrallel refference of an angel to jesus? |
when jesus said i and my father are one, there was no rationalisation then, abi, but when he said below that; BERNIMOORE: do you realise that the oneness with God includes believers, read it below in the same book of john;was rationalisation, you deceive yourself alot, there you failed in your argument |
[size=38pt]At What Point [/size][size=18pt]Did God Create Hell[/size] anyone pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeese! |
frosbel and anyone on the thread, should [size=18pt]KINDLY DEFINE AN ANGEL![/size] |
frosbel: Sorry for the long wait, been dealing with other Tithe mattersare you done? honestly your points here are without substance, i tried not to argue with you because we agree in some areas, but anyway i will point out some things. |
Pastor Olu T: This is so surprising, I asked a simple n u started quoting without saying anything about the scriptures I asked the question from?as of the point jesus was making, he want believers to attain everlasting life, love virtues, hate vices that can deprive them of the glory of everlasting life But as of the question about what he meant by fire,torment etc, sorry, im not jesus, the question you ask now is for him!, ok?, the tread is for you to tell us AT WHAT POINTHELL WAS CREATED,simple, all i know is the verses you quoted were metaphorial and i pointed them out and i have shown you! you can create a thread for that anyway, i will join you! but on this thread....AT WHAT POINT DID GOD CREATE HELL, ANSWER! |
billtommy: Are we clearling saying/agreed by the advertised hell was created by men/human beings and not God?are you saying that hell was situated in heaven? pls answer, im waiting! |
and permit me to pair the question to two,a)and b) Pastor Olu T: (a) Ok I will stick to the question. You claimed Jesus uses figure of speech in driving home His points, n I will want to agree with u on that for now. But I have a question for u, if he uses allegory so what's the point He was trying to make, or what exactly did He mean with the fire, torments etc. (b) You said the story of Lazarus was not real, another question, so why put in real xters (Abraham, the prophets n Jesus inferred) in a story that ain't real?. lets start with (a) Pastor Olu T: (a) Ok I will stick to the question. You claimed Jesus uses figure of speech in driving home His points, n I will want to agree with u on that for now. But I have a question for u, if he uses allegory so what's the point He was trying to make, or what exactly did He mean with the fire, torments etc. let us use the scrpture to answer this, do you even know that 'hell' and 'lake of fire' are different? if hell is such hot as you can imagine, very unconfortable, isn'nt it? and torments is said to take place there, why would 'hell' as hot as it was, after it had delivered those dead in it, hell itself will be thrown into 'lake of fire' which is also hot? read it below; Revelation 20:12-14 12 And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works. 13 And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and[b] death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them[/b]: and they were judged every man according to their works. 14[size=14pt] And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire[/size]. but, we have got a hint earlier about how God will deal with death itself that kills, isaiah 25:8 [size=14pt]he will swallow up death permanently[/size]The sovereign LORD will wipe away the tears from every face, and remove his people's disgrace from all the earth. Indeed, the LORD has announced it! [size=14pt]if God will swallow up 'death' forever means 'hell' too beign thrown into lake of fire means it will be swallowed up![/size] this shows us clearly that there was no literal place of torment, but rather a total removal of death. again, hell as it is used; [size=14pt]Hell - Hades - Sheol and the Lake of Fire[/size] It's interesting the word "hell" is not mentioned in the Old Testament however the word "sheol" is mentioned 65 times (depending which Bible translation you use). H7585 שׁאל שׁאול she'ôl she'ôl sheh-ole', sheh-ole' From H7592; hades or the world of the dead (as if a subterranian retreat), including its accessories and inmates: - grave, hell, pit. Sheol is simply the Earth, the ground beneath our feet. The grave. But it is more than that. It was a place that both evil and righteous appear to go. Job 24:19; "Drought and heat consume the snow waters, So does Sheol those who have sinned. Psa 9:17; The wicked will return to Sheol, Even all the nations who forget God. Prov 23:14; You shall strike him with the rod And rescue his soul from Sheol. |
Hisblud: As open minded as the Jews that took up stones to stone Yahshua when He said the Father and I are ONE!do you realise that the oneness with God includes believers, read it below in the same book of john; hisblud: We are learning... do you agree? Now this statement made by Yahshua was done on earth... do you agree?@Hisblud can you be sincere to reveal the same form jesus was when jesus said this; john 17:20,21 20 Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on me through their word; 21 That they all may be one; [size=18pt]as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us[/size]: that the world may believe that thou hast sent me. [size=14pt]so, we believers are also equal with GOD in heaven? using the analogy of 'the form jesus was when he was talking' as you claim to stress your point[/size] i doubt your sincerity to answer this obvious truth! |
this is the imposition of purgatory torment(not created at any time by God) but by the Decree of Union drawn up by the Council of Florence italy http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/12575a.htm Purgatory (Lat., "purgare", to make clean, to purify) in accordance with Catholic teaching is a place or condition of temporal punishment for those who, departing this life in God's grace, are, not entirely free from venial faults, or have not fully paid the satisfaction due to their transgressions. The faith of the Church concerning purgatory is clearly expressed in the Decree of Union drawn up by the Council of Florence (Mansi, t. XXXI, col. 1031), and in the decree of the Council of Trent which (Sess. XXV) defined: "Whereas the Catholic Church, instructed by the Holy Ghost, has from the Sacred Scriptures and the ancient tradition of the Fathers taught in Councils and very recently in this Ecumenical synod (Sess. VI, cap. Bleep; Sess. XXII cap.ii, iii) that there is a purgatory, and that the souls therein are helped by the suffrages of the faithful, but principally by the acceptable Sacrifice of the Altar; [/b]the Holy Synod enjoins on the Bishops that they diligently endeavor to have the sound doctrine of the Fathers in Councils regarding purgatory everywhere taught and preached, held and believed by the faithful" (Denzinger, "Enchiridon", 983). [b]Further than this the definitions of the Church do not go, [size=14pt]but the tradition of the Fathers and the Schoolmen must be consulted to explain the teachings of the councils, and to make clear the belief and the practices of the faithful.[/size] |
Ubenedictus: actually he may say genesis 1 is a religious myth, though stories d work of God is outline, d bible isn't a science book, it is d relationship of man with God.you are suprised so do i, even more surprised at the cardinal proclamation alongsides atheists and co..! now, my brother catholic theology was against what sacred scripture teaches, true or false? the bible was very clear that adam was the first man: #that God actually breath the breathe of life into his noserills #and that Adam became a living soul #he gave Adam a companion Eve #that eve actually gave birth to cain, Abel and others #cain killed abel #and so on..... #the account was VIVID! |
Enigma: And what did God the Father call Him?why not quote the next verse? verse 9 at what point did God personally call jesus God, evidently it was after his ressurection to heaven,not in his pre existence im not saying that christ is not a God, but lesser to the supreme God,father that is why the next verse stressed below; Hebrews 1:9 9 Thou hast loved righteousness, and hated iniquity; therefore God, even thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness [size=14pt]above thy fellows[/size]. who are jesus fellows here, the answer is found(bolded) in the same hebrew chapter heb 1:4 Hebrews 1:4 King James Version (KJV) 4 Being made so much better than the [size=14pt]angels[/size], as he hath [size=14pt]by inheritance obtained a more excellent name than they[/size][angels]. jesus by default is NOT A GOD! but by inheritance having obeyed his father to the point of death he inherit those accolades! |
BERNIMOORE: malachi 3:1 gave us the hint of what form that jesus pre-existed; |
BERNIMOORE: @Hisblud[size=14pt]jesus pre-exist as a spirit 'messenger' or 'messenger of covenant' "behold, he shall come" [/size] |
hisblud: Ok so you are in agreement that Yashua pre-existed?yes! |
Beretta92: Man created hell...shikena!thank you! even the so called purgatory! |
jesus was in that same form when he said this; john 17:20,21 20 Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on me through their word; 21 That they all may be one; [size=18pt]as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us[/size]: that the world may believe that thou hast sent me. so, we believers are also equal with GOD in heaven! using the analogy of 'the form jesus was when he was talking' as you claim to stress your point ![]() |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 (of 162 pages)

