₦airaland Forum

oluwafemme129:
Red card to our Skipper Jordan Henderson, this guy should have been remove from the first half

Liverpool fans are celebrating that red card on social media.
They never wanted Henderson in the starting lineup.

That guy is far from a captain material.

FBS:
Empire. But the way the directors are "forcing" their hyper liberal relationship views on the show is getting ridiculous.
Moreover, the pace has gone way too slow. Will skip the show for now.

How are they forcing their liberal views on you.

Did they force you to watch their show.

Didn't you download and watch it while acting on your own free will.

Did the producers put a gun on your head to make you watch their liberal show.

Everybody has their own taste.
If a show doesn't suit your taste, then leave it.

It's very simple.

All this 'forceful ' excuse is getting really stale.
Especially when you know you have every freedom to
watch or abandon any TV show.

Nova15:
So how WB found a replacement for Henry Cavil yet?

Henry Cavill is not out yet.
He is still Superman until he hangs his cape and announces to the public that he's not.

Until then, ignore the rumours.

If Barcelona is looking at MO Salah, Van Dijk or any Liverpool superstar, they should forget it and look elsewhere.

Liverpool has had enough of grooming average players into world class superstars just for Barça to buy them off...

They say... NO MORE!

J2381:
have you seen Batman: Assault On Arkham?

Batman Assault on Arkham is the best animated batman film I have seen.

But it is more of a Suicide Squad film than a Batman film cuz most of it is centered around Suicide Squad and their mission to find Joker's bomb.

I watched it 5 years ago on DVD and now you've reminded me of it, I feel like downloading it just to re-watch it again.

One of the best DC animated films I have seen in the last decade.

MobileGees:
Beorn Koicereloaded

I've got a word of advice for you two.


If you don't believe in God and after Death you find out God exist you have EVERYTHING to lose, but if you believe in God and find out he exist or doesn't you have NOTHING to lose

Don't be a fool wise up

Believing in one particular GOD then dying and finding out he's not the one true GOD could get you fùcked as well.

You could believe Yahweh all your life just to die and find out Vishnu is the one true GOD.

Better to be agnostic and save yourself the stress.

Jason Momoa, Amber Heard and James Wan ....at a fan event in China.

The rape culture in Nigeria will never be eradicated until we stop being rape apologists and victim blamers and start fixing the problem from the root of it.

SAY NO TO RAPE.

MJBOLT:

yet[b] you guys claim marvel made the captain marvel movie because of WW success[/b] when development of captain marvel started as far back as 2013

No we never said that.

Marvel already had plans for Captain Marvel but was getting cold feet about the movie because of the perpetual failure of female superhero movies in the past.

So when DC did Wonder Woman and it became a critical and commercial success.

It gave Marvel execs the confidence to push forward with a Captain Marvel movie.

This is not balant claim... Or a speculation.

It is something that Kevin Feige admitted to the public with his own mouth in all honesty.

Thanks to feminism.

The tides are changing for female superheroes and that is great.

Minemrys:
Exactly. You see, WB had all these characters right fr0m the dawn of c0mic bo0ks, yet there was no m0vie abt them. N0w, a rival studio starts making films of unkn0wn characters and turning them into instant hits, and all of a sudden, WB wants to start making these films just the way its rival is doing, and we d0n't want c0mparis0ns? I want Aquaman to b0mb so WB can sit back and think again. They ruined Justice League for me, having Aquaman be a hit w0n't teach them a less0n.

So you saying WB made Aquaman movie because Black Panther was a hit.

What the hell

WB started planning Aquaman movie way back in 2014.

2014

So this talk about WB producing Aquaman to be a reply to Black Panther.... Like a clap back or something.

That stuff ain't true.

This is not like old days when WB only made Batman and Superman movies.

Things have changed.

They are finally building a cinematic universe based on DC comics which is great.

And you can't have a cinematic universe without making movies for unknown characters.

Aquaman is not even an unknown character to start with.
He is an A-list character in DC comics and he's already popular even before Justice League.

How can you build a cinematic universe without making movies for characters not named Batman or Superman.

Like how is that even possible.

Unless you want a return to the old days of Batman and Superman movies.....then we wouldn't even see Wonder Woman on big screen not to mention Aquaman or Flash.

Minemrys:
nah, i didn't get the idea fr0m marvel fans on youtube. Early 2018, marvel releases a film detailing a hidden civilised african nati0n, has a royalty theme of 2 siblings battling for the crown. 1 is a full bred wakandan, the other is seen as an outcast due to the machinati0ns of the thr0ne.
Late 2018, Dc releases a film abt a hidden civilised underwater nati0n, has the r0yalty theme of 2 brothers battling for the thr0ne. Our hero is n0w the outcast due to the machinati0ns of the thr0ne, the villain is the full bred atlantean. The side villain even has the name 'black manta', the previous release was titled 'black panther'. Our villain even does the wakandan salute in0rder to use his suit. He is played by a black man who has a beard that l0oks like the other black guy who played black panther.
Aside, in black panther the villain was the cocky one, in this, it's the hero that is. In Panther, so many tribes make up wakanda, in Aquaman, so many tribes make up atlantis.

Comic books... Anybody

Black Panther and Aquaman share some similarities.

YES.

But still... Aquaman's story, the hidden kingdom, the seven kingdoms of Atlantis, evil half brother.

All that story that make up Arthur's arc was established 25 years before Stan Lee created Black Panther.

So instead of Aquaman being Black Panther underwater, it should actually be the other way round.

Calling Aquaman Black Panther underwater is making mockery of the comic book storyline which was established 25 years before Black Panther.

It makes it look like Aquaman's story got inspiration from Black Panther.
Which is not true.

Some fans have called him Thor underwater because he has an evil half brother, wields a magic weapon and is heir to the throne of a special kingdom.

I can deal with that....

But Black Panther....

Nah....

Anything but that.

In conclusion, I say we stop the comparison and celebrate the fact that we getting two comic book royalties in the same year

Gosh.... Those visuals
So beautiful


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2wcj6SrX4zw

There's a 3rd trailer now.
I wasn't expecting it to come out so soon.
That was fast.

Minemrys:
since DC want to start following the marvel pattern, it can no l0nger avoid the c0mparis0n.

There will always be comparison.

But one comparison I cannot tolerate is Aquaman and Black Panther.

How can you Minemrys have the effrontery to call Aquaman a Black Panther underwater.

That is shitty comparison.

The only thing Aquaman copied from Marvel is Namor.
Arthur is just a rip off of that character, the only difference is Arthur is much more famous than Namor.

Atlantis was not invented by Marvel and it is definitely not a rip off of Wakanda.

It is based on Greek mythology.

Aquaman movie is basically a comic book adaptation.

And yes Aquaman was invented 25 years before Black Panther.

Therefore Aquaman as Black Panther underwater is wrong on so many levels.

If Black Panther movie didn't come out before Aquaman, nobody will make all that shitty comparison.

raumdeuter:
Thank you for showing that interception the key attribute of sensible defenders Laporte is leading VVD

You deliberately ignored the 3 major places VVD leads Laporte but focused on only interceptions.

The interceptions sef is very close.

LaPorte got 1.3 and VVD has 1.2.

Very close.

Meanwhile VVD dey give LaPorte serious gap for blocks and clearances.

He also leads LaPorte in tackles.

Of course you saw that but you deliberately pretend you no see am.

Afolabi6046:
you dey mind am?
Because Liverpool made 2nd just once in the last 9yrs mean we should neglect the fact that they have just conceded 5 goals so far in the EPL, and they have played Arsenal and City, those games last season na like 8 goals dem suck

Liverpool has gotten their best ever start to a PL season.

Liverpool have also conceded their least goals after 12 goals for the first time in over a decade, beating the defensive record they set in 1990.

And someone say VVD did not improve Liverpool

VVD vs LaPorte.

2018/19 PL season.


Make una come see am o.

Notice that VVD has more blocks, tackles and clearances.

Laporte only has more interceptions and that is almost the same as VVD.

Later someone will still say LaPorte is better than VVD.

raumdeuter:
Laporte has less goals conceded per game than VVD which is the most important factor here.

This season for example. Laporte played more games and conceded less. When there is no Karius to lie on top his head

You have not done anything to counter the two good points I gave you.

VVD played more big teams but apparently you don't know how to counter that point.

I told you LaPorte has less work to do this season cuz City's attack is so good hence the defense has less workload.

Unlike Liverpool where their attack lost form and their defense has greater work load.

Liverpool has struggled against some small teams this season but City is busy thrashing teams upandan.

Hence VVD has faced greater challenges than LaPorte.

Can you counter that point.

raumdeuter:
Sane didnt go to the world cup with them, Every coach has his preference. The fact the blackmanta was claiming here was false.

VVD has conceded more goals /game than Laporte for City That is the fact

I just heard your beloved LaPorte can't even get into France team.

Oops..

raumdeuter:
Sane didnt go to the world cup with them, Every coach has his preference. The fact the blackmanta was claiming here was false.

VVD has conceded more goals /game than Laporte for City That is the fact

Thats the only point you got.

And I gave you two more points to counter it.

Number of games and quality of teams faced.

VVD is better than LaPorte.

That is a fact.

raumdeuter:
You bring your own stat and disprove mine. which one do you have a problem with

I gave you goals conceded in EPL CL and FA cup which one do you have a problem with

I told you VVD played 9 more games than LaPorte.

I told you VVD played more big teams than LaPorte and I even listed it.

But you still think your LaPorte is the better player.

Mean while you have done nothing to prove it apart from ranting about goals conceded which I have countered with two good points.

Your opinion is what we call unpopular opinion

It has not proved your LaPorte to be better than VVD.

You are just running in circles looking to punch holes through my points without bringing a tangible point to back your precious LaPorte.

raumdeuter:
If you cannot et your basic facts right then why should anyone take you seriously

You first started by telling us Liverpool has conceded the least goals in Europe after VVD joined joined, I warned you to check your facts but you insisted and I have put out facts that are opposite of what you claimed


I went to check like you asked us to and found that your facts were laced with lies

Laporte conceded 21 goals in 30 games
VVD conceeded 34 goals in 38 games

You know Chelsea fans are not very bright and you can serve them any type of lies they will gobble it up and like your post

But there are some of us committed to eradicating ignorance here

Where did you get your stats from

How does this prove that LaPorte is better than VVD when VVD played 9 more games and faced tougher and bigger teams

raumdeuter:
After getting exposed by superior facts you are now backtracking or who wrote this

"While LaPorte was playing small teams like Swansea, Cardiff, Newcastle, Watford etc.. Teams that will barely attack you."


Are you able to dispute this fact

Laporte conceded 21 goals in 30 games
VVD conceeded 34 goals in 38 games

LaPorte against big teams...

Chelsea twice
Arsenal
Liverpool thrice
Tottenham twice
Manchester United

Total = 9

VVD against big teams

Tottenham twice
PSG
Napoli
Man City thrice
Chelsea thrice
Manchester United
Roma twice
Madrid
Arsenal

Total = 15

Now who has spent more time playing small teams

LaPorteeeeeeee......

raumdeuter:
As for the Karius excuse

This season without Karius

VVD 16 games 1405 mins 10 goals conceded
Laporte 17 games 1527 mins played 8 goals conceded

Laporte has played more games and conceded less goals

I am expecting the next excuse

This is the thing about facts they are stubborn and dont bend to emotional arguments

Are you talking about this season where City always finish 90% of their matches with over 70-80% ball possession.

Which team attacked them well this season except Lyon.

Liverpool have been average in attack this season.

VVD and Alison has bailed them many times this season.

Most of their matches this season ended 50/50 or there about in ball possession.

They have struggled even against some small teams.

But City always thrashing teams, what kind of work do you think LaPorte has done apart from passing the ball.

VVD has done more work this season unless you don't watch Liverpool matches.

raumdeuter:
I listed the big games because you fraudulently wanted us to believe Laporte was only playing Swansea and cardiff. So in case you have forgotten

3 times vs Liverpool twice vs Chelsea and Spurs etc

I listed the competitions where they conceded which you quoted you are free to disagree with any of them, the first thing is to get your facts straight

I never said LaPorte never played big teams.

My point is he spent more time playing small teams and less big and challenging teams than VVD.

If you want me to list the games, I can do that.

LaPorte played big teams, yes, but not as much as VVD.

In conclusion....


1. Taking into account the number of big teams VVD faced which is more than LaPorte did.

2. Taking into account that VVD played 9 more games than LaPorte...hence facing more challenges than LaPorte.
Here, the defender with more games get more credit.

3. Taking into account that VVD played more matches with a shitty keeper like Karius as against LaPorte playing with a fantastic keeper like Ederson.
(with Allison at the post now, the tides are changing for VVD.. .no more Karuis...good)

Taking. into consideration the afformentioned factors.

LaPorte is good but VVD is the best.

No disrespect to LaPorte, I have to admit he's a close second

raumdeuter:
Facts matter what you posted up there are not backed by facts

VVD has played 38 games for Liverpool

In the CL last season
Conceded 1 vs City, 6 vs Roma, 3 vs Madrid =10
In the CL this season
Conceded 2 vs PSG, 1 vs Napoli and 2 vs Red Star = 5

In CL alone VVD conceded 15 goals

In the FA cup conceded 1 vs Everton and 3 vs West Brom
In the FA cup alone conceded 4 goals


In the EPL for Liverpool

Last season conceded 10, this season 5

Total in EPL 15

Total overall 15 + 15 + 4 = 34 goals conceded

Now Laporte 30 games played for City

Last season CL 7 goals conceded, this season CL 3 goals conceded
Total CL goals conceded 10

FA cup 1 goal conceded vs Wigan

EPL
5 goals conceded last season 5 conceded this season

Total EPL goals conceded 10

10 EPL + 10 UCL + 1 FA cup = 21 goals conceded

Laporte conceded 21 goals in 30 games
VVD conceeded 34 goals in 38 games

Laporte has played Liverpool thrice, Chelsea twice, Spurs twice, Arsenal once Man Utd once

You can disagree with any of these facts above.

You shouldn't have bothered mentioning the big teams LaPorte faced cuz its very obvious that VVD faced more challenging and big teams than him.

If you want me to list all big teams both of them faced.

Come on let's do it and know who faced more challenges.

It's VVD.

Where did you get the stats that says VVD conceded 34 goals and LaPorte 21.

Mind you, I did not count unofficial matches like club friendly and pre season games.

VVD also played 9 more games than LaPorte.

Don't forget that.

Dudeonyx:
Just watched episode 06, really interesting.

But man if you thought Dick was too violent then Jason's level of violence will surprise you. He is ultra violent and has serious personal issues just like in the comics.

I like Kory's new suit but not the lipstick.

I loved the scene where she orders Rachel and Gar to sit and they instantly obey ���

Are you serious

Well Jason Todd is the Robin that was killed by Joker and would later resurrect to become the cold hearted villain Red Hood...

So no surprise there

Downloading episode 6 asap....

If Ronaldo and Messi miss out.

Kylian Mbappe should collect it.

He was better than Modrič at the World Cup and in addition to winning WC he also won 3 more trophies at PSG.

His champions league campaign may have been terrible but winning the World Cup has more than made up for that.

Varanë does not deserve it one bit.

I rather Antoinne Griezmann than Varane pls.

But las las the captains and coaches will vote and the person with highest votes will win votes.

The embittered fans of the two alleged Goats should stop crying foul play.

It is done by voting and the two alleged GOATS are not getting enough votes... Sorry

raumdeuter:
How many goals has liverpool conceded in games vvd played and how many goals has city conceded in games Laporte played
Give number of games played and goals conceded

Vvd and Laporte cannot be responsible for goals conceded when they are not in the field. So give us number of games each of them played and goals conceded in those games

LaPorte - 17 goals conceded.

VVD - 28 goals conceded.

VVD played 9 more games than LaPorte.

And yes ,he faced tougher and bigger teams as well more times than LaPorte.

VVD is the best... Admit it.

While LaPorte was playing small teams like Swansea, Cardiff, Newcastle, Watford etc.. Teams that will barely attack you.

VVD played Madrid, Chelsea thrice, Man City thrice, Arsenal twice, Tottenham twice, Roma twice.. Etc.

LaPorte got nothing on VVD.

raumdeuter:
Are you sure about this?

Can you tell me how many goals Liverpool have conceded in all competitions in games that VVD played and lets compare to someone like Laporte

Both of them got to their current clubs in January

As at 2 weeks ago, this was Liverpool's record.

Updated... to present day.

Goals conceded in 2018. .

Manchester City - 34

Liverpool - 36

I don't know why you brought up LaPorte.

VVD played more games than him.

And yes, when discussing goals conceded the defender with more games get the bigger credit.

The more games you play, the bigger the challenge of not conceding.
The less games you play, the lesser the chances of conceding.

Hence VVD is the winner here .

LaPorte doesn't come close.

VVD played 9 more games than LaPorte.

VVD is hands down the best defender in premier league.

#fact

I dare you to bring up another PL defender to compare with him.

I don't know why some people still think VVD did not improve Liverpool's defense.

Imagine dragging defensive record with Man City.

Liverpool and Man City have the best defensive records across Europe top 5 leagues in 2018.

Only 2 goals separate them.

And yet some people still have effrontery to underate VVD's effort at Liverpool.

It can only be envy and jealousy.

raumdeuter:
You sef see am? This season we are hearing that VVD is leading the Liverpool defence thats why they are not conceding. But when they conceded 10 goals in 5 games it was because of Milner Karius and everyone except VVD

Since Van Dijk's arrival in January, Liverpool has conceded the least number of goals and kept the most clean sheets than anyone across all 5 European top leagues in 2018 #Facts

This is not a joke.

It is truth.

I won't argue with you, plz check out the statistics for yourself.

But according to some people VVD is overrated and has not improved Liverpools defence.

The statistics say otherwise.

VVD is arguably the best defender in PL.

I wonder where Liverpool would be without him.

You can cherry pick Van Dijk 's performance looking for something to use against him but you take away his stats and records away from him.

He is one the best.