₦airaland Forum

Blacks have low IQ. not leadership problem but IQ problem . you get it ?

ifenes:
Okay okay!

Reincarnation is from the word "Incarnation" Incarnate mean to take up flesh/avatar,and Re-incarnation is an act of doing it again. The act of repeating a stage of existence or a parallel is an atribute of a Spirit/Atom

Spirit

All things are Spirit vibrating at different frequencies.Your body is solidified Spirit or crystallized Spirit. For better scientific understanding,lets call it "Electromagnetic energy"

VOODOO

This is a permission slip. Just like Ifa,it is the manipulation of energy field which has been perfected by a voodoo expert. It is similar to a pianist perfecting the piano art.

It is not a negative tool as it has been painted by inferior religion,who did that out of fear. Voodoo is natural and should be studied for the common good of man.

Due to its negative picture,it has been left to the hand of the illiterates who do not know they are handling what I call "Advance Alchemy"

Another Fool on the loose.

JohnAdeDavid:
If there is any of you guys here claiming God isn't real how would u explain a sick patient diagnosed with Hiv-Aids, a disease without cure being free from it thereafter...The answer is GOD IS REAL...

I wonder. this fools should go to a native doctors house and slap him and ask him if their are gods. fools would never dear to do this. they only rant on Nairaland. Cowards.

Mormonism is Cultic it has nothing christanity about it period.

stephenmorris:
joseph1013:
LET'S TALK ABOUT THE CREATION ACCOUNT(S)

The bible contains 2 accounts of creation and both are quite contradictory. The first one is narrated in Genesis 1:1-31 and the second one is Genesis 2:4-25. The first account is what is popular with Christians and that is what I'll discuss.

It starts with the passage: "Gen. 1:1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.

1:2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep."

This passage suggests that the whole universe (Earth and other heavenly bodies) was made at the same time and it was dark. This contradicts known facts about the Universe, as the Earth is about 4.6 billion years old and the Universe is about 13 billion years old. And so, the earth is much younger than the universe.

Going further down the narrative in the next couple of verses, Light was made next but the Sun wasn't made until Day 4. You have to wonder what this 'light' was since the only source of light for the earth is sunlight and then you also have to wonder how the days were counted since we count our days by the earth's rotation using daylight from the Sun. In other words, how were the first 3 days counted?

Moving on... The firmament was Created next. What is this? There's nothing like a firmament dividing the waters above(?) from the waters beneath the earth. This firmament thingy always confuses me. Explanations will be welcome in the comments section.

Next, Dry Land was created. This doesn’t make sense seeing as even if the earth was filled with water when made, the water would have been on land. In other words, land existed before water. No point having a special day to create land again.

Next, God made Plants before making the Sun. Another senseless narrative seeing as plants cannot possibly exist without the sun. In fact, life could not have existed BEFORE the Sun here on earth. The fact that the Sun only comes into play on the 4th day make nonsense of the whole creation story. Moving on...

Next, the sun and moon were made as light giving sources for night and day. But sadly, the moon is not a light source. The moon is a lifeless piece of rock that does not give it's own light. You would think the maker of the Universe would know this, No?

Next, he made the Stars also (as an afterthought?) "To give light upon the earth." Sadly, only a very tiny fraction of the billion billion 'Stars' can be visible from the earth and so their 'giving light' ability is severely limited in this regard. God no think this thing well o. Lol.

Next, he made animals and then Man. I wouldn't go into how it is an error to say Whales were made before Reptiles (that would be being too pedantic). In verse 27, it appears that 'Man' represented both male and female as they were made together and yet in the next chapter, the woman was made (again?) from the rib of man. Confusing sturvs, lol.

All in all, as a factual account of the origin of the universe, this creation story fails woefully BUT if taken as nothing more than Jewish folklore at par with other creation stories from different cultures around the world, it makes for interesting literature. The maker of the Universe should know how the Universe was made. This story couldn't have been inspired by It, Ergo the Bible has already failed from its first chapter as being a divinely inspired book.

Fool is the Bible a Science Book? the purpose of the Bible is to guide Man to his maker( God). and not to explain every detials about the Universe .God is too big to answer all your stupid questions.
Scondly Science is an area of study just like humanities,Social Sciences and other proffessions. using Science as the yard stick to prove if God exists or not. is like a fool using Economics to understand and treat Malaria. they are two different fields that cannot be rationalized in labs.

oaroloye:
SHALOM!

Let me get to the point: I do not like MORMONISM.

I first heard of it from CULTS & ISMS, by J. Oswald Sanders, and KINGDOM OF THE CULTS, by Walter Martin in the Early 1980s.

(1) It is based on BLASPHEMY and PLAGIARISM of Egyptian Hieroglyphics no one in the immediate vicinity could read then, but which were later identified by an expert to be from something called "THE BOOK OF BREATHINGS."

Also, JOSEPH SMITH plagiarised THE KING JAMES VERSION Bible, pretending to translate them with magic crystals he said were the Ancient "URIM and THUMMIM" of The Bible, which nobody knows what they were, but JOSEPH SMITH SAID were SPECTACLES.

However, his so-called translation from Egyptian exactly copied all of the recognized KJV Translation Errors, which could not have happened, were he translating from Egyptian.

We now know- which Joseph Smith could not- that a TOUCH of an Angel would provide INSTANT UNDERSTANDING OF ANY LANGUAGE.

THE BOOK OF MORMON IS A LIE.

(2) Joseph Smith was a KNOWN 419 CON-MAN, who received the TAR & FEATHERS "Award" from his countrymen.

(3) JOSEPH SMITH was a FAILED COUP-PLOTTER, who tried to MURDER his way into Power, was not able, surrendered, was jailed, but was shot dead attempting to leave the jail via the window.

(4) The HEBREW ISRAELITES Movement has proven that the ORIGINAL Hebrews of The Bible were BLACK, and not WHITE, at all. The WHITES who claim to be JEWS were never in the EXODUS from Egypt (the Egyptians were also Blacks,) but are IDENTITY THIEF IMPOSTORS, who appear to have sold the Hebrew Blacks into Slavery in America.

The White Racist Scum Mormons support the White Supremacy Delusion, and say that NOAH CURSED the descendants of CANAAN with SUPERIOR SKIN, BONES, TOTO and EVERYTHING- while the White Skin cooks like DODO in what they CLAIM is their ANCESTRAL ENVIRONMENT,

No GLASS CEILING in Sports, but the Oyinbo BISCUIT-BONE GLASS-JAW will for ever be an obstacle to World Heavyweight Boxing Domination by the TAMAHU Failed-Genetics-Experiment Oyinbos.

Extensive brainwashing via FAKE OYINBO Education has covered up The Truth- but it is coming out again!

MORMONISM is part to this PROPAGANDA Campaign to make out that BLACKS are ACCURSED inferiors to the Oyinbos.

(5) MORMONISM is a FRONT for FREEMASON LUCIFERANISM, and an ASYLUM for WITCHES whose Powers have DESTABILIZED.

[See: EXPOSING THE ILLUMINATI FROM WITHIN, by William Schnoebelen.]

What have you to say to answer to these charges?

Stupid senseless article. Blacks Hebrews? i laugh in Spanish

Lennycool:
God, Jehovah, Yahweh, Allah what ever name you or your religion refer as God is imaginary, most of the points presented here are drawn from the website http://godisimaginary.com/index.htm which offers a more detailed explanation, but that aside here are the main points that prove that God is imaginary.

1. Read the old testament: It is filled with a lot of barbaric acts which include rape, genocide and even slavery(Exodus chapter 21:32
Leviticus chapter 25:44
Genesis 6:17
Even new testament
Colossians chapter 3:22

that God specifically commanded the Israelite to commit, now why would a self proclaimed all loving father of humanity, allow or in some cases command his children to do these to other human beings regardless of the cause, there's are only two explanation, either God is okay with slavery, genocide, and rape in which case he would be psychopath and not a loving father or he didn't inspire these parts of the bible to be written, but if that's the case what other things in the bible isn't God's word and how would we know the difference.

2. Notice the delusion of prayer: in Matthew 17:20 Jesus says: for truly, I say to you, if you have faith as a grain of mustard seed, you will say to this mountain, 'Move from here to there,'and it will move; and nothing will be impossible to you.
if what Jesus says is the case then why is it anytime we pray for something completely impossible, no matter how selfless it is it never works. For example a devout christian could pray for all the starving children in the world to suddenly have food on their plate for the next one year and it would not happen, or you could pray for every cancer patient in the world to be miraculously healed and it would never happen. why? because God doesn't exist and prayer is an illusion, if you notice when you pray it mostly about things that have a lot or even a slight chance of happening on its own accord e.g you can pray to get a job you were interviewed for, or that you pass your exams now the odds for these happening are very high, even in the cases of miraculous healings for example someone being cured of cancer or some deadly illness. They chances of survival were never zero, let's say 20,000 people have a certain kind of cancer that leaves sufferers with a 10% chance of survival, now out of that 20,000 a handful survives and one of them is a christian who prayed, now he or she will immediately assume it was because if God and the media will report about the miraculous healing, not mentioning anything about the other 20,000 patients many of whom died, now if that sufferer had prayed that all 20,000 be healed it would not have worked because that would be impossible.
3.)Understand other historical Gods: The belief in "god" seems to be ubiquitous through the ages. We know, for example, that the ancient Egyptians believed in their gods so fervently that they built massive structures like the Great Pyramid -- still today one of the largest and most enduring human constructions ever created. Despite that fervor, however, we as a society have decided with complete certainty today that the Egyptian gods were imaginary. Thus we do not build pyramids anymore and we do not mummify our leaders. We reject all of the rituals and ceremonies of the Egyptian religion because there is no evidence of their gods' existence.
More recently we know that tens of millions of Romans worshiped Jupiter and his friends, and to them they built magnificent temples. The ruins of these temples are popular tourist attractions even today. Yet society have decided with complete certainty that these gods were imaginary. Mainline society is no longer building temples to these gods or worshiping them because there is no evidence for their existence. Much more recently, we know that the Aztec civilization believed in their gods so intensely that they constructed huge temples and pyramids. In addition, Aztecs were so zealous that they were sacrificing hundreds of human beings to their gods as recently as the 16th century. Despite the intensity, however, we know today that these gods were imaginary. The Aztecs were insane to be murdering people for their gods. Killing a person has no effect on rainfall or anything else. We all know that. And there is no evidence whatsoever demonstrating that the Aztec gods exist. If the Aztec gods were real, we would still be offering sacrifices to them and these sacrifices would be effective. Thus we come to understand that he fact that millions of people worship a god is meaningless. The "God" and the "Jesus" that Christians worship today are actually amalgams formed out of ancient pagan gods. The idea of a "virgin birth", "burial in a rock tomb", "resurrection after 3 days" and "eating of body and drinking of blood" had nothing to do with Jesus. All of the rituals in Christianity are completely man-made. Christianity is a snow ball that rolled over a dozen pagan religions. As the snowball grew, it freely attached pagan rituals and beliefs in order to be more palatable to converts. You can find accounts like these in popular literature: see these quotes from the Da Vinci code by Dan brown.
"The vestiges of pagan religion in Christian symbology are undeniable. Egyptian sun disks became the halos of Catholic saints. Pictograms of Isis nursing her miraculously conceived son Horus became the blueprint for our modern images of the Virgin Mary nursing Baby Jesus. And virtually all the elements of the Catholic ritual - the miter, the altar, the doxology, and communion, the act of "God-eating" - were taken directly from earlier pagan mystery religions."*."Nothing in Christianity is original. The pre-Christian God Mithras - called the Son of God and the Light of the World - was born on December 25, died, was buried in a rock tomb, and then resurrected in three days. By the way, December 25 is also the birthday or Osiris, Adonis, and Dionysus. The newborn Krishna was presented with gold, frankincense, and myrrh. Even Christianity's weekly holy day was stolen from the pagans."
we've all accepted that bother the gods of the Egyptians, Aztecs and romans were not real despite their various acts of belief, so what is different from today's religion.
4.) The delusion of faith: http://godisimaginary.com/i7.htm This is actually to long to type but I implore you to read it as it is one of the main points given.
5.) Notice you never listen to Jesus: Jesus made a number of very clear statements about money and wealth in the Bible. For example:
Matthew 6:19Do not lay up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy and where thieves break in and steal; but lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust destroys and where thieves do not break in and steal.
Luke 14:33Any of you who does not give up everything he has cannot be my disciple.
Matthew 6:24 No one can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or else he will be loyal to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and Money.
Matthew 19:21-24 Jesus answered, "If you want to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me." When the young man heard this, he went away sad, because he had great wealth. Then Jesus said to his disciples, "I tell you the truth, it is hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God."
Matthew 19:28-29 Jesus said to them, "I tell you the truth, at the renewal of all things, when the Son of Man sits on his glorious throne, you who have followed me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel. And everyone who has left houses or brothers or sisters or father or mother or children or fields for my sake will receive a hundred times as much and will inherit eternal life.
Luke 9:23-25Then he said to them all: "If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and take up his cross daily and follow me. Do I even need to explain this read the full blog. I'm ready for questions and arguments.

What a useless and baseless article. Clown you Apetheists should be writing articles on how Athiesms has benefitted mankind or you can write articles with facts and evidences to prove Evolution. instead you spend your time writing against Christanity becos i guess their is nothing to write about Evolution. it is all theories and fantasies. fool

raphieMontella:
i ask again.. How did you become able to use a phone?

Clown answer my Question and stop running away from the question.

raphieMontella:
lol...for real?
Are u sure u work in science?
Who made the claim dude?

Which one is easier for you? to keep asking me this same question or to show me one law in Science that is consistent with your Evolution garbarge. this is a challenge . i had Atheists are all knowing .

raphieMontella:
i ask again.. How did you become able to use a phone?

Clown answer my Question and stop running away from the question.

9.Vision of Birds of Prey
It had long been thought by generations of
scientists that birds of prey (such as eagles
and falcons) located their prey by means of
an acute sense of smell, however it has since
then been discovered that such birds actually
have a very poor sense of smell. Instead,
ornithologists have determined that such
birds have remarkable vision capabilities. In
fact, it has been discovered that while some
such birds are diving to catch their prey, the
shape of the cornea varies during the
descent, enabling it to maintain a perfect
focus. In about 1500 BC, Job 28:7 makes
note of the falcon's excellent vision, and in
Job 39:27-29 it states that the eagle looks
down from an inaccessible cliff, and spies out its prey "from afar."

10. Size of the Universe:The Universe is so high and big,that Scientists do not know the Exact Size or Shape.according to Scientists what we see and study is a small fraction of the entire Universe called the Observable Universe. This fact was known only in the last 150yrs when Space orbirting and Space telescope technology was invented.but the Bible declears in Jeremiah  31:37 Thus saith the LORD; If heaven above can be measured, and the foundations of the earth searched out beneath, I will also cast off all the seed of Israel for all that they have done, saith the LORD.also in
2 Chronicles  2:6 But who is able to build him an house, seeing the heaven and heaven of heavens cannot contain him? who am I then, that I should build him an house, save only to burn sacrifice before him? and Isaiah  55:9 For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts. This Bible verses express that the Heavens(Universe) is too big and unmeasurable.

11.Number of Stars: in 161-126BC,Hiparchus counted the no. of  the Stars of Heavens and put the number at 1080Stars,later ptolemy predicted them to be 1056,this figures were widely accepted as been fairly accurate. When telescope was invented Man discovered that Stars were countless.this has already been stated by prophet Jeremiah.
In the book of Jeremiah 33:22   "As the host of heaven cannot be numbered, neither the sand of the sea measured: so will I multiply the seed of David my servant, and the Levites that minister unto me"
Jeremiah did not guess but accurately stated that the Stars of Heavens were countless like the  sand of the Sea.

In Conclusion.
There are many more examples and incidents; but due to space and time constrain .i would not be able to write all of them.
This  Scientific facts in the Bible, confirm that only God who is Ominipotent and OminiScience,inspired the writing of the Bible.it also Shows that the study of Science is meant  to reveal God's intelligent design and Creative ability ,Hence  to draw us close to God,  it has never been in Conflict with Christainity, contrary to the propangander spread by Athiests.

A lot of people especially those in the Science World , see the Bible as an ancient book, that has no significant value in our present world.but is the Bible just an ancient Book? A carefull look at the Bible will show us that the Bible is far realiable than any other book ever published.A lot of Scientific facts were  authoratively Stated by the Bible ,thousands of years ago,even  before Science could find its feet. We will take a look at some of these facts.

1.Expanding Universe.
Scientists have discovered that the Universe is expanding, this was discovered by Edwin Hubble.
The Bible declears in Psalms  104:2 Who coverest thyself with light as with a garment: who stretchest out the heavens like a curtain, In Isaiah  42:5 Thus saith God the LORD, he that created the heavens, and stretched them out; he that spread forth the earth, and that which cometh out of it; he that giveth breath unto the people upon it, and spirit to them that walk therein,
Isaiah40:22 that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in. Job  9:8 Which alone spreadeth out the heavens, and treadeth upon the waves of the sea. also mentioned in
Isaiah51:13,Isaiah45:12.
Note: In the Bible the Universe is referred to as the Heavens(plural).this Bible verses tells us that God is expanding(strecthes out) the Universe like a curtian. It is amazing how the Bible states this scientific  facts over 2000yrs ago before Man and Science  could even observe it .

2.The Shape of the Earth:For thousands of years man  could not describe the shape of the Earth with certianity.the Greeks,Egyptians,Romans all had different opinion of the shape of the earth.some thought it was flat,some said it was rectangular,but God inspired Isaiah to  know that the Earth was a Circle/Sphere. In Isaiah  40:22 says,
" It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers"Modern telescope and Space travel have proved that the Universe is a Circle/Sphere.the Bible stated this fact about 2000yrs ago when the Book of Isaiah was written,something Man and Science could not have known ,except in the last few years.

3. Water Cycle:This is the movement of water & water vapour in the earth. The Cloud acts as a reservior for storing water that evaporates as a vapour from rivers,lakes,tanks,plants.e.t.c when the cloud is saturated with water vapour and is cooled below its dewpoint the water vapour condenses into rain .long time ago(2000yrs ago) before Science and man, could understand  how  water cycle operates, Job was inspired  by God to mention it in the Bible. Job  36:27-28 For he maketh small the drops of water: they pour down rain according to the vapour thereof,Which the clouds do drop and distil upon man abundantly.
God talks about the Evaporation,distillation and condensation of vapour into water which is the watercycle(movement of water between the cloud and Earth)
When the cloud is saturated it releases the excess water vapour and absorbs more when it is less saturated(balancing)
Job37:16. Dost thou know the balancings of the clouds, the wondrous works of him which is perfect in knowledge?
Job  26:8 He bindeth up the waters in his thick clouds; and the cloud is not rent under them.

4.The  Earth in the Universe:
For thousand of years man could not explain , how the
Earth was balanced or supported in the Universe. for one to know  how the Earth  was supported in the Universe,one must have travelled out of Earth to Space.this was not possible until when Rockets and Space travel became possible in the last 100yrs.but the Bible written over 3000yrs, declears in Job 26:7 He stretcheth out the north over the empty place, and hangeth the earth upon nothing.
The Earth hangs on nothing in the Universe, this has been proved by Space travel,only God could have inspired job to know this,considering that Man could not travel to Space during the time of job.but could only do so , in the last 100yrs

5.Wind Cycle:Thousands of years before Man and Science  could understand the movement of the Earth,wind,temperature,Oceans,air pressures,and there effect on Weather and Seasons.the Bible states in  Ecclesiastes  1:6 The wind goeth toward the south, and turneth about unto the north; it whirleth about continually, and the wind returneth again according to his circuits.This Bible verse talks about wind Cycles.
Job  37:9 Out of the south cometh the whirlwind: and cold out of the north.
and Job  37:17 How thy garments are warm, when he quieteth the earth by the south wind?here God talks about, how the wind influences Seasons .all this have been proved by Geographers and weather forcaster(metrologists)

6.Equator,longitude & latitude:Before Man and Science could develop and understand the Geography of the Earth,and that the Earth was not irregular in Shape. The Bible declears in Job  38:5 Who hath laid the measures thereof, if thou knowest? or who hath stretched the line upon it? God asked Job if he knew the Measurements and Co-ordinates of the Earth, thousands of years before man could have the capacity to know about the Equator and how to measure the Earth.
Today Geographers reley on  measurements like (equator,Longitude,Latitude,Earth Diameter,e.t.c  inorder to locate places and time on Earth).

7.Ordinances(Laws) of Heaven: Scientists have observed that the planets are orderly situated and each rotates around the Sun on its Axis.it has also been proved that the motion of the planets around the Sun,aswell as the rising and falling of the Sun and Moon are orderly.
The universe is neither haphazard nor arbitrary; nature conforms to logical, mathematical relationships (Laws or Ordinance) set in place by the Lord. This was expressed in the Bible
In Jeremiah  33:25 Thus saith the LORD; If my covenant be not with day and night, and if I have not appointed the ordinances of heaven and earth;
Job 38:33   Knowest thou the ordinances of heaven? canst thou set the dominion thereof in the earth? and also in  Jeremiah 31:35   Thus saith the LORD, which giveth the sun for a light by day, and the ordinances of the moon and of the stars for a light by night, which divideth the sea when the waves thereof roar; The LORD of hosts is his name.
It was only during the advent of powerfull telescope and Space travel ,that man was able to discovers planets,stars,galaxies and the laws of the Universe,something the Bible stated thousands of years ago.

8.Genetically Inherited Characteristics:
In the early 1800s, the French naturalist Jean
Baptiste de Lamarck proposed the hypothesis
of the "inheritance of acquired
characteristics," in which it was suggested that animals could (by exercise, diet,grooming, etc.) develop certain traits in their
bodily structures, which as a result would then be passed on to their offspring. Lamarck
gave as an example, the giraffe, which supposedly stretched its neck upward to get food, and after many generations of
stretching this resulted in offspring which were born with longer necks.
This hypothesis has since been proven wrong,
because the body cells (somatic cells) in an animal do not pass on any such developmental changes to the sexual reproductive cells (germ cells; sperm and
eggs). We now know that it is the germ cells which pass on the inherited characteristics to
the offspring, including any potential to develop under various conditions.
It is thus quite fascinating, that in Genesis 30 Jacob did the same mistake Lamarck did.He tried to produce spotted and sparked goats by putting a white and dark streaked rod in front of the eyes of the animals while they were breeding or mating he thought this  will lead to them giving birth to sparked or spotted goats,but God Showed Jacob in a dream the accurate genetic method.Genesis31:10 "In the breeding season of the flock I lifted up my eyes and saw in a dream that the male goats that were mating with the flock
were striped, spotted and mottled. Then the
angel of God said to me in the dream,'Jacob,' and I said, 'here I am!' And he said,'Lift up your eyes and see that all the male
goats which are mating with the flock are striped, spotted and mottled, for I have seen
all that Laban has been doing to you."
---With this statement, God makes it clear in
Genesis that it is not what the parent might see while mating, but it is the genetically-
produced appearance of the coat of the parent which affects the appearance of the
coats of the offspring... even though spotted
goats were previously removed (which Laban did in order to "double-cross" Jacob), the
genetics of the spotted males (who actually did the mating) is passed on to the young.
Although this accurate assessment of the situation was revealed to Jacob in about
1500 BC, these genetic laws were not understood by scientists until thousands of
years later.

KingEbukasBlog:
He talks about ignorance like he can explain the origin of sexes and non vita a vita

I wonder. some fools boost about Science which they know nothing about.

KingEbukasBlog:
He talks about ignorance like he can explain the origin of sexes and non vita a vita

I wonder, fools keep boosting about Science they know nothing about.

Buharimustdie20:
Idiots like you spark wars among sects in all religion
Evolution should have leached you out

Your ingnorance is beyond comprehension. fools like you make the Devils work easy. Dumb shit.

raphieMontella:
why are u using a phone? What is that?

Clown answer the Question.

raphieMontella:
all laws of science?
Hian...and u work science daily?

If their is any Scientific law that is consistent with Evolution ,you can post it for us to see.

HCpaul:
But been created from dust make perfect sense? An intelligent sculptor molded Adam and just breath inside his nostril and he gear up to life.

This same intelligent sculptor did operation on Adam by using one of his ribs to create an updated version of him and Adam that was I coma eventually called a replicate of himself a woman because she came out of man.

Am not hear to argue with a configured brain what evolution is and what it is not cuz I know that our Christian brothers in Africa doesn't know and they are not ready to know.

So that makes perfect sense.

Clap for yourself.

I just don't have the time cuz if I do, I would have tell you more about that your book by using both philosophical and theological approach.

Your insincerity comes when you find it difficult to see a single error in your primitive book but keep finding faults with other people's doctrine. Mind you, atheism is excluded.

This ignorance will stop one day.

Fool can you explain how bones in a liquid called sperm can form and grow in a woman's womb? their are things too big for your little ego ,brain and Science to understand.
You see why i call you a fool. you do not Believe that God could mould man from clay. ,which is logical .considering the fact that a sculpture must be made by someone. you rather believe that man can from Rock. which requires more faith to believe.

If you like believe their is no God.no matter how you try, it cannot make it to be true. so stop decieving yourself .Cowards like you hide under the belief of their is no God inorder to feel unaccountable to God. but that is just an illusion.

You think Religeon will wear out. i laugh at you fool. instead of Christainity or religeon to wear out .we are moving into religeous climax when Satan will Show his true motives on his captives like you. keep fooling yourself while Satan and Satanist keep gaining ground towards One World Government. you are too Dumb and blindfolded to even look and understand what is happening in the World today.

winner01:
If you dont believe you are an animal that magically appeared and accidentally evolved over the years from rocks and slime, then you are insane!!!

Sorry for this post ,we are on the same side. i thought i was reffering to HCpaul.

raphieMontella:
all round evolution proven =90
micro evolution:100%
macro evolution:80% or a bit less..
Bt hey...seconds do turn to minutes..and minutes to hours..so its the same to me..
Abiogenesis:60% or more...
Two experiments...mullers' gave amino acids..
The other gave dna base...

Total garbarge . give us facts not this trash.
Why are humans and plants not Evoluling now?

winner01:
Has science ever confirmed life evolving from non-life?

I wonder.

raphieMontella:
all round evolution proven =90
micro evolution:100%
macro evolution:80% or a bit less..
Bt hey...seconds do turn to minutes..and minutes to hours..so its the same to me..
Abiogenesis:60% or more...
Two experiments...mullers' gave amino acids..
The other gave dna base...

Total garbarge . give us facts not this trash.
Why are humans and plants not Evoluling now?

raphieMontella:
u lack basic knowledge of both words ''evolve and science''

I live and work Science everyday .
Evolution contracdicts all the law of Science,thats a fact. you can disprove my opnion with examples

winner01:
If you dont believe you are an animal that magically appeared and accidentally evolved over the years from rocks and slime, then you are insane!!!

It sounds Stupid that you Atheist base your arguments of God not existing on Science.but still contradict Science with your claims.

Man came from rock!!! so why have all the Rocks presently not evolved ? Clown

Cosmologists debate whether the space-time
continuum is finite or infinite, bounded or
unbounded. In all scenarios, the fine-tuning
remains the same.
It is appropriate to complete this section on
"fine tuning" with the eloquent words of
Professor John Wheeler:
To my mind, there must be at the bottom
of it all, not an utterly simple equation,
but an utterly simple IDEA. And to me that
idea, when we finally discover it, will be
so compelling, and so inevitable, so
beautiful, we will all say to each other,
"How could it have ever been otherwise?"

In conclusion all the Scientist agree that It is impossible for the Universe to come into existence by Chance .They all believe that the world was designed and created to be Inhabited by Man. now the BIG question is who did the creation.my answer is God.

Atheist should please give me Scientific facts Superior to what this Nobel award winning Scientist have said. since the very Scientist Atheist look up have said that the World could not have come into existence by Chance

winner01:
oh! HCpaul is good with the "insanity" rhymes.

I was supposed to include that as one of the points

Atheism makes you sane
You cant be religious and be sane. All religious people are insane. Period!!!

By believing that you came from Ape. I laugh at you , So you see why you are insane?

Sorry for my former comment. we are on the same side. i thought it was Hcpaul.

The Fine Tuning of the Universe an article by Gerald Schroeder According to growing numbers of scientists, the laws and constants of nature are so "finely- tuned," and so many "coincidences" have occurred to allow for the possibility of life, the universe must have come into existence through intentional planning and intelligence. In fact, this "fine-tuning" is so pronounced, and the "coincidences" are so numerous, many scientists have come to espouse The Anthropic Principle, which contends that the universe was brought into existence intentionally for the sake of producing mankind. Even those who do not accept The Anthropic Principle admit to the "fine- tuning" and conclude that the universe is "too contrived" to be a chance event. In a BBC science documentary, "The Anthropic Principle," some of the greatest scientific minds of our day describe the recent findings which compel this conclusion. Dr. Dennis Scania, the distinguished head of Cambridge University Observatories: If you change a little bit the laws of nature, or you change a little bit the constants of nature -- like the charge on the electron -- then the way the universe develops is so changed, it is very likely that intelligent life would not have been able to develop. Dr. David D. Deutsch, Institute of Mathematics, Oxford University: If we nudge one of these constants just a few percent in one direction, stars burn out within a million years of their formation, and there is no time for evolution. If we nudge it a few percent in the other direction, then no elements heavier than helium form. No carbon, no life. Not even any chemistry. No complexity at all. Dr. Paul Davies, noted author and professor of theoretical physics at Adelaide University: "The really amazing thing is not that life on Earth is balanced on a knife-edge, but that the entire universe is balanced on a knife-edge, and would be total chaos if any of the natural 'constants' were off even slightly. You see," Davies adds, "even if you dismiss man as a chance happening, the fact remains that the universe seems unreasonably suited to the existence of life -- almost contrived -- you might say a 'put-up job'." According to the latest scientific thinking, the matter of the universe originated in a huge explosion of energy called "The Big Bang." At first, the universe was only hydrogen and helium, which congealed into stars. Subsequently, all the other elements were manufactured inside the stars. The four most abundant elements in the universe are: hydrogen, helium, oxygen and carbon. When Sir Fred Hoyle was researching how carbon came to be, in the "blast-furnaces" of the stars, his calculations indicated that it is very difficult to explain how the stars generated the necessary quantity of carbon upon which life on earth depends. Hoyle found that there were numerous "fortunate" one-time occurrences which seemed to indicate that purposeful "adjustments" had been made in the laws of physics and chemistry in order to produce the necessary carbon. Hoyle sums up his findings as follows: A common sense interpretation of the facts suggests that a superintendent has monkeyed with the physics, as well as chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about in nature. I do not believe that any physicist who examined the evidence could fail to draw the inference that the laws of nuclear physics have been deliberately designed with regard to the consequences they produce within stars. Adds Dr. David D. Deutch: If anyone claims not to be surprised by the special features that the universe has, he is hiding his head in the sand. These special features ARE surprising and unlikely. Universal Acceptance Of Fine Tuning Besides the BBC video, the scientific establishment's most prestigious journals, and its most famous physicists and cosmologists, have all gone on record as recognizing the objective truth of the fine-tuning. The August '97 issue of "Science" (the most prestigious peer- reviewed scientific journal in the United States) featured an article entitled "Science and God: A Warming Trend?" Here is an excerpt: The fact that the universe exhibits many features that foster organic life -- such as precisely those physical constants that result in planets and long-lived stars -- also has led some scientists to speculate that some divine influence may be present. In his best-selling book, "A Brief History of Time", Stephen Hawking (perhaps the world's most famous cosmologist) refers to the phenomenon as "remarkable." The remarkable fact is that the values of these numbers (i.e. the constants of physics) seem to have been very finely adjusted to make possible the development of life". "For example," Hawking writes, "if the electric charge of the electron had been only slightly different, stars would have been unable to burn hydrogen and helium, or else they would not have exploded. It seems clear that there are relatively few ranges of values for the numbers (for the constants) that would allow for development of any form of intelligent life. Most sets of values would give rise to universes that, although they might be very beautiful, would contain no one able to wonder at that beauty. Hawking then goes on to say that he can appreciate taking this as possible evidence of "a divine purpose in Creation and the choice of the laws of science (by God)" (ibid. p. 125). Dr. Gerald Schroeder, author of "Genesis and the Big Bang" and "The Science of Life" was formerly with the M.I.T. physics department. He adds the following examples: Professor Steven Weinberg, a Nobel laureate in high energy physics (a field of science that deals with the very early universe), writing in the journal "Scientific American", reflects on: how surprising it is that the laws of nature and the initial conditions of the universe should allow for the existence of beings who could observe it. Life as we know it would be impossible if any one of several physical quantities had slightly different values. Although Weinberg is a self-described agnostic, he cannot but be astounded by the extent of the fine-tuning. He goes on to describe how a beryllium isotope having the minuscule half life of 0.0000000000000001 seconds must find and absorb a helium nucleus in that split of time before decaying. This occurs only because of a totally unexpected, exquisitely precise, energy match between the two nuclei. If this did not occur there would be none of the heavier elements. No carbon, no nitrogen, no life. Our universe would be composed of hydrogen and helium. But this is not the end of Professor Weinberg's wonder at our well-tuned universe. He continues: One constant does seem to require an incredible fine-tuning -- The existence of life of any kind seems to require a cancellation between different contributions to the vacuum energy, accurate to about 120 decimal places. This means that if the energies of the Big Bang were, in arbitrary units, not: 100000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000 000000000000000000, but instead: 100000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000 000000000000000001, there would be no life of any sort in the entire universe because as Weinberg states: the universe either would go through a complete cycle of expansion and contraction before life could arise, or would expand so rapidly that no galaxies or stars could form. Michael Turner, the widely quoted astrophysicist at the University of Chicago and Fermilab, describes the fine-tuning of the universe with a simile: The precision is as if one could throw a dart across the entire universe and hit a bulls eye one millimeter in diameter on the other side. Roger Penrose, the Rouse Ball Professor of Mathematics at the University of Oxford, discovers that the likelihood of the universe having usable energy (low entropy) at the creation is even more astounding, namely, an accuracy of one part out of ten to the power of ten to the power of 123. This is an extraordinary figure. One could not possibly even write the number down in full, in our ordinary denary (power of ten) notation: it would be one followed by ten to the power of 123 successive zeros! (That is a million billion billion billion billion billion billion billion billion billion billion billion billion billion zeros.) Penrose continues, Even if we were to write a zero on each separate proton and on each separate neutron in the entire universe -- and we could throw in all the other particles as well for good measure -- we should fall far short of writing down the figure needed. The precision needed to set the universe on its course is to be in no way inferior to all that extraordinary precision that we have already become accustomed to in the superb dynamical equations (Newton's, Maxwell's, Einstein's) which govern the behavior of things from moment to moment. Cosmologists debate whether the space-

Another achievement you failed to mention is Insanity.

Atheists are more stupid than i can imagine.

tartar9:
So you can freely distribute your books but don't want others to distribute theirs

Then post Science books not Satanic books

CoolUsername:
... thus showing us that science is a trustworthy and unbiased disciplined that is concerned with finding the truth.

The fossil was already revealed to be fake more than half a century ago. This is hardly breaking news.

pathetic comment.

cloudgoddess:
It's a misconception that evolution progresses towards some ultimate apex. Although the "aim" of natural selection is to filter out the best-fit organisms in a population, this standard of fitness is constantly in flux due to environmental factors. So there is no ultimate "most evolved" anything.

Evolution by natural selection occurs in response to the environment, not the other way around, so extinction is an inevitable part of evolution. If an environment becomes too hostile for a certain species to survive, then that species dies out. That's what's happening with climate change. Which by the way is human-caused.

You are pathetic. is this the defintion of Evolution? you can twist words and definition to suit your deception.