₦airaland Forum

If u see the leopard in this picture hit on d like button. Let's see those that have gud eyes

If u see the leopard in this picture hit on d like button. Let's see those that have gud eyes

NwaEzefuNaMba:
Igbos been doing Africa proud since origin!!

it's lyk u re high on Orijin

All I can see is a MAN not a BOY controlling a drone. Did he purchase it? Did he create it? Op pls tell us and dis tym around show us d framework and d technology with d pictures of d "biafraan" at work as u called him

OP has forgotten 2 include d possibility of ur house getting invaded by d Chinese for meat.

neoapocalypse:
Walahi you no serious , see as you make me the coke wey I dey drink go choke me

sorry o my broda

mike404:
OP, YOUR NAME SAYS IT ALL... #westmustbeconquredviajihad

I am a muslim, all I knw is peace. I wnt exchange words with u. But if u re willn 2, assalamu alaika, I wnt respond. My father calls for prayer. In Hausa d person dat calls for prayer is called "ladan". "Bn" or "bin" means son of. I'm his son so I call myself "bnladan". Wateva u think about d name is ur own cup of tea. I luv d name and will always call myself binladan. In peace I leave u

It's surely AUN(Abti).

U cud hv add "ino" or "ho in d name. Smthn lyk "Folukinho" or "Folukino". Dey'll accept d name

Usman Musa Maizare a former SUG president of UDUS is d best SUG President ever.

From a shepherd girl in Morocco to the Minister of Education of France. (The first woman and the youngest person - at 36 -to ever make French Minister of Education. As well as first Muslim.) While some are too busy shouting #BanMuslims or #BanMoroccans, Najat Belkacem quietly reminds us that immigrants are an asset - and that believing in our children and investing in them with the right character traits and the right education literally means the sky is the limit.

For the record, Najat became determined to succeed in politics when she observed the rise of Le Pen (France's Donald Trump) and the right wing in France. She recalls how at her first fundraiser - as she welcomed guests in and took their coats many mistook her for the house maid. Today, she's called "The New Face of France." The best way to #SilenceTheHaters is to #BeTheChange

Fynestboi:
TOTAL


OBAFEMI AWOLOWO UNIVERSITY:
JUDGES W: 50
JUDGES X: 45
JUDGES: Y: 45



LAGOS STATE UNIVERSITY:
44
44
46.5




GRAND TOTAL
OAU 140
LASU: 134.5





Winner: OAU.
BESTdebater: OAUTemitayo 77.7%

grave injustice. LASU Shud hv won. And timilide or wats his name is my best debater. No question was directed 2 OAU debaters by d judges. D oda speaker frm LASU was targeted. I pray my school fail 2 progress 2 d final if dis same set of judges will preside over d debate.

obiorathesubtle:
bruce wayne?? Batman's a love-vendor??



Anyway.. Once a ho.. Always a ho

I smell Gotham

AceRoyal:
Ridiculous and stu.pid.

d first fool has showed up. Waitn 4 d 2nd, 3rd...

Empiree:
So, Who Wrote Mark and What Were His Sources?

Not even the Bible claims that Mark was an eye witness to Jesus’ ministry. Modern, non Christian biblical scholars believe that the gospel of Mark was written in Syria by an unknown Christian no earlier than AD 70, using various sources including a passion narrative (probably written), collections of miracles stories (oral or written), apocalyptic traditions (probably written), and disputations and didactic sayings (some possibly written). These stories were in circulation year after year, told in different languages and in different countries from that of Jesus.

That’s it. The source for the gospel of Mark is other peoples’ stories and writings. In other words, all of Mark’s sources were at best, second hand, more likely fifth or sixth hand. What happens to stories that circulate orally for years? Obviously, they come to be changed in the retelling. Thus, the source for much of the synoptic gospels is no more than hearsay.

Apologists dismiss the charge of “hearsay” by pointing to the strength of the “oral tradition”. The simple childhood game of “Telephone” is sufficient to illustrate the point that stories told mouth to mouth for 35 years or more can’t possibly retain their original content.

The Gospel of Mark is the first of the Gospels to proffer quotes allegedly from Jesus. We question how authentic these quotes could possibly be, given the convoluted path from Jesus’ lips to “Marks” wax tablets and the years that passed since the words were allegedly spoken. We have written a treatise on the impossibilities of Jesus’ actual words being accurately recorded 40+ years after they were spoken.

Who Wrote Matthew and What Were The Sources?

By the end of the 2nd century the tradition of Matthew the tax-collector had become widely accepted, and the line “The Gospel According to Matthew” began to be added to manuscripts. For many reasons scholars today believe otherwise—fifty five percent of the gospel is copied from Mark, and it seems unlikely that an eyewitness of Jesus’ ministry would need to rely on others for information about it. They believe instead that it was written between about 80–90 AD by a highly educated Jew, intimately familiar with the technical aspects of Jewish law, standing on the boundary between traditional and non-traditional Jewish values.

A widespread theory holds that the author drew on three primary sources, each representing a distinct community: a hypothetical collection, or several collections, of sayings (called “Q“, and shared with Luke); the Gospel of Mark; and material unique to Matthew (called “M”, some of which may have originated with Matthew himself).

He wrote for a Jewish audience: like “Q” and “M”, he stresses the continuing relevance of the Jewish law; unlike Mark he never bothers to explain Jewish customs; and unlike Luke, who traces Jesus’s ancestry back to Adam, father of the human race, he traces it only to Abraham, father of the Jews. The fact that his linage differs significantly from that of Luke is a real problem for those who claim that the Holy Spirit’s hand guided the writers of the gospels.

The content of “M” suggests that the community for which this gospel was written, was stricter than the others in its attitude to keeping the Jewish law, holding that they must exceed the scribes and the Pharisees in “righteousness” (adherence to Jewish law); and of the three only “M” refers to a “church” (ecclesia), an organised group with rules for keeping order. Biblical scholars generally hold that Matthew was composed between the years c. 70 and 100.


Who Wrote Luke and What Were the Sources?

Most modern critical scholarship concludes that Luke used the Gospel of Mark for his chronology and a hypothetical sayings source Q document for many of Jesus’ teachings. Luke may also have drawn from independent written records. Traditional Christian scholarship has dated the composition of the gospel to the early 60s, while higher criticism dates it to the later decades of the 1st century. While the traditional view that Paul’s companion Luke authored the gospel is still often put forward, a number of possible contradictions between Acts and Paul’s letters lead many scholars to dispute this account.


Who Wrote John and What Were the Sources?

John differs significantly from the synoptic gospels in theme, content, time duration, order of events, and style. Only ca. 8% of it is parallel to these other gospels, and even then, no such word-for-word parallelism occurs as we find among the synoptic gospels. The Gospel of John reflects a Christian tradition that is different from that of the other gospels. It was rejected as heretical by many individuals and groups within the early Christian movement. It was used extensively by the Gnostic Christians. But it was ultimately accepted into the official canon, over many objections. It is now the favorite gospel of many conservative Christians, and the gospel least referred to by many liberal Christians.

They have a totally different agenda in mind for their audience than did the authors of the synoptic gospels. The authors of the synoptic gospels were writing to their fellow Jews and trying to convince them that they could accept Jesus as the Messiah and still remain Jewish. Matthew even indicates that the men should still be circumcised .

John’s teachings , as summed up in John 3:16 are just the opposite of those of the writers of Mark, Matthew and Luke. Whereas John welcomes anyone into the fold, Mark, Matthew and Luke write for and to Jews only. They see Jesus as the Jewish Messiah who has come to return Israel to its former glory.

The gospel identifies its author as “the disciple whom Jesus loved.” The text does not actually name this disciple, but by the beginning of the 2nd century a tradition began to form which identified him with John the Apostle, one of the Twelve (Jesus’s innermost circle). Today the majority of scholars do not believe that John or any other eyewitness wrote it and trace it instead to a “Johannine community” which traced its traditions to John; the gospel itself shows signs of having been composed in three “layers”, reaching its final form about 90-100 AD.


Bottom Line

The canonical gospels upon which the Christian faith is built, the ones which present the words of Jesus are writings by unknown authors writing to buttress the particular points they wished to make. The quotations allegedly from Jesus were most likely, made up by the authors to support their positions.

The titles in our English Bibles are later additions; they are not original to the Gospels themselves.
The Gospel narratives are always written in the third person.
The tradition that they were written by two disciples (Matthew and John) and by two companions of the apostles (Mark and Luke) is first attested in the 2nd century!
What we can say for certain about the authors is that they were all highly educated, literate, Greek-speaking Christians of (at least) the second generation, contrast this with the apostles of Jesus, who were uneducated, lower class, illiterate, Aramaic-speaking peasants.
Even IF the gospels had been written by the “eye-witness” apostles, Matthew and John, it is unlikely that they reported everything accurately. Remember that their “testimony” comes thirty years (Matthew) and sixty years (John) after the fact. This would-be “eyewitness” testimony is, at a minimum, 30 years after the events it purports to describe and the authors were in or nearing their dotage. In any event, recent research has found that eyewitness testimony is not reliable. Read an excerpt from an article entitled “34 Years Later, Supreme Court Will Revisit Eyewitness IDs” By Adam Liptak Published: August 22, 2011, NY Times.

Qul jaa'al haqqi wa dhaharal baadila, innal baadila kaana xahuuqaa. Man yuridillaha bihi khairan, yufaqqihhu fiddiini. JaZaakallahu khairan ya akhee.

Topic: An IDP camp controlled by Christain management, Young muslim children forced to convert to christianity- MCAN

https://www.nairaland.com/3011252/idp-camp-controlled-christain-management.

♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️
#FreeMuslimChildrenInEdo
#MCANCares

ABDUCTED MUSLIM CHILDREN FORCEFULLY CONVERTED TO CHRISTIANITY IN EDO IDP CAMP.

As a matter of urgency and immediate attention,
Muslim Corpers' Association of Nigeria (MCAN) use this medium to reaffirm and throw more light on the recent post of Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC) about the above headline currently going viral. As a result of the Boko Haram insurgency, some Muslims were taken from different states in the Northern part of Nigeria to a CHRISTIAN CONTROLLED IDP camp in Edo State, hundreds of children were forcefully or deceitfully converted to Christianity and the worst of all is that the management of the camp denied MCAN access to the needed populace of the Camp.

As part of the humanitarian activities of the association, on the 5th of February, 2016, MCAN Edo state's Amir and
general secretary went to the Internally Displaced People's camp at Uhuagua village, Edo State to inform the camp management about the intention of MCAN to visit , conduct free medical check Up, donate items and above all, admonish the inhabitants of the camp to remain patient and hopeful in Allah (God ) as directed by MCAN National but the management of the camp which was headed by a pastor stated that they do not allow such, in fact the pastor started acting funny once he noticed MCAN is constituted by Muslims who intended to admonish those under his care.

The Edo state Amir stated that his first surprise was to have seen that it is a CHRISTIAN camp as the frontage sign board reads "INTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN CENTRE FOR MISSION". He stated that ; they were dressed for jumat and obviously tagged as Muslims, Thus, they spent over 2 hours to be properly checked and confirmed as NYSC Corps members, though the security persons (Military) were friendly. He further stated that the head of the camp explained that the subjection to scrutiny of identity was a security measure. The Amir also stated that he was amazed that there was no single worship center in the camp for Muslims bearing in mind that there are/were Muslims among those in the camp. He gathered this fact from some young adults who were reluctant to associate with them.

After submitting an official letter of purpose as instructed by the pastor in charge, he claimed the only thing MCAN would be allowed to do was to hand over the relief items to the management of camp which will be distributed to the inhabitants of the camp on behalf of MCAN. All efforts to make the pastor understand that MCAN is a recognized body by NYSC and REGISTERED with a CERTIFICATE OF CORPORATION was to no avail. Until the pastor was informed that MCAN National visited the biggest IDP camp (Dalori Camp,Maiduguri) in Nigeria about some weeks back for the same purpose of visit to Edo camp, without any problem or prevention by The Dalori IDP camp management before he agreed to allow MCAN access the children only. Based on this a foul play was sensed.

The case was reported to the Sultan of Sokoto during a meeting and he stated that ; they (Nigerian Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs - "NSCIA" are aware and they equally tried to take some of these Muslims out of the camp through the defense minister but children were manipulated or psychologically influenced to stone the military men, claiming they preferred the camp to their homes. After this, NSCIA decided to let go and left the children in the hands of Allah (God) in order to avoid religious conflict within the country. Roughly a month later , the case of #EseOruru came up to shake the whole Nigeria, this is synonymous to the issue at hand. "Abduction of Children and forcefully changing their fate". MCAN believes the children are minors , therefore , The Christian camp cannot determine what fate is best for them, just as it is in the case of #EseOruru.

MCAN noticed a lot of the Muslim inhabitants of the camp might have been deceitfully or forcefully converted to Christianity, since there is nothing to attribute themselves to in the camp as Muslims, In fact it was difficult to spot out the Muslims. These are some of the reasons why it was perceived that the pastor heading the camp intentionally prevented MCAN from gaining access to the elderly ones because their conscience can be easily preached to , unlike the children. More so , THE CHILDREN MIGHT HAVE BEEN BRAINWASHED BY THE PASTOR AND HIS STAFF TO STONE US LIKE THEY DID TO OTHERS IN THE PAST.

Knowing fully well that it was Muslims he was dealing with , the Pastor went as far as sharing pamphlets with inscription "I saw Jesus" to the MCAN representatives, this shows how far the camp management must have gone to make sure they convert all the Muslims in the camp to Christianity, leaving them with no option.

In all , we are not happy with the current state of the camp in sense that ,AN IDP CAMP SHOULD NOT BE SOLELY MANAGED BY A PARTICULAR RELIGIOUS BODY since we have TRADITIONALIST , MUSLIMS and CHRISTIANS who might be taken to such camp.

MCAN should be granted access to all the accessible inhabitants of the camp. Any act of "stone throwing" at us must have been planned and influenced by the CHRISTIAN MANAGEMENT in charge.

Islamic religious structure should be built in the camp. Else, If the camp will maintain its CHRISTIAN Name and current mode of operation, all Muslims should be evicted to a Muslim camp.

Furthermore , MCAN does its community services for the sake of Allah and not for recognition by anyone , therefore MCAN should be allowed to carry out Community Development Services in as much as its members identity and genuineness of intention can be proved beyond all reasonable doubts.

Anyone who knows or has a child or relative there should kindly meet with MCAN, MURIC or NSCIA for collective report to the rightful authorities.

On this note, we draw the attention of the presidency, Senators, media houses, human right activist , Muslims and non Muslims within and Outside Nigeria to instruct the CHRISTIAN CONTROLLED IDP CAMP in EDO STATE to release the MUSLIM children to their parents or SUPREME COUNCIL FOR ISLAMIC AFFAIRS, allow recognized religious bodies to have access to the entire populace of the camp and Preach to them just as CHRISTIANS have been doing in the camp. In fact , the idea of a religious IDP camp solely managed by a particular faith needs to be stopped.

Finally, If it were Muslims that did this , the media would have exploded long ago with comments like "MUSLIMS WANT TO ISLAMIZE NIGERIA".

This is not to trigger any problem but for the rightful to be done. LET US COME TOGETHER TO STOP THIS and #FreeTheMuslimChildrenInEdo

KINDLY SHARE TO AS MANY AS POSSIBLE TILL IT CIRCULATES THE COUNTRY.

25th of March, 2015.
#MCANCares
Facebook : MCAN National
Website : www.muslimcorpers.org
MUSLIM CORPERS' ASSOCIATION OF NIGERIA (MCAN)

Apena Ibrahim Adeboye
National Public Relations Officer.
call : 08108316118
Text : 08103553734
WhatApp: +233570691296 (you can add to your Islamic groups).

Address : plot 1065, behind VIO office, Mabushi, Abuja, Nigeria

Dereformer:
It beat my imagination how the south has failed to realize they have a common enemy in Hausa/Fulani.

the gud tin bout us (d northerners) is dat we dnt see u as enemies. Until u realise dat, we'll always be ahead of u.

Where were u wen ur mates were graduatn with 1st class

missingrib:
must u guys keep repeating this same joke

Honestly speakn I've not seen dis b4

Look @ dis hillarious painting of giraffe named mouse...I wonder wat teachers in dis school teach dia students. Can't stop laffn

Congrats 2 my Abokii broda. #ProudlyAboki

Congrats 2 my Aboki broda. #ProudlyAboki

Spaxon:
what is the super eagles? we don't know them here in Hawaii

Who knows Hawaii?

kunlesufyan:
The money part is so true!!! Can't blame them ,who doesn't want to live comfortably ...I'll always respect a self made lady...

Everybody does, but money @ d same tym is not everythn. You dnt hv 2 be super rich 2 earn luv. Its not fair. I'll gv my daughter 2 any responsible person dat has a job dat can sustain dem. Parents too are blindfolded and obsessed with rich ppl nowadays. Dats y deciet and lies increase everyday, ppl showing odas wat dey wnt 2 see not d real persons dey are.

funnynation:
Number one is correct while number 7 is..
All women need 7inces joystick size and above.. They need a man that can last 45mins and above..
.


Nairaland official comedian

believe me nowadays ba, some women marry eunuchs so far dey hv money. N.B I'm not generalizing oo

Women are precious gifts from God to men but
sometimes they are not always gifts but something
else which is the main reason why i decided to write
this article ( What you don't know about Women).

1. 75% of Women Wants money more than love:
Its true that nothing will be perfect without money
but these days women can marry a man 90-year-old if he is rich and well
connected. If you disagree with me, then tell me
any young lady you heard of getting married to an old man of about 65-70 years old that is poor.

2. To be accepted two things are involved:
With no doubt I have noticed two major things
women consider before saying yes to a man which
are; first, Money and second Handsomeness.
If you don't have money or good looks, then expect to get one 'yes' out of uncountable
approaches.

3. You don't have to die for women:
Are you the type who will always be ready to die for
love and women precisely? Then you are
making a big mistake because once you are gone it
will not take her few months to start all over again with your friend or her Ex.

4. Don't see any girl as an Angel at the beginning:
Women tend to be angels at the beginning of
relationships. When she gets what she wants you will
see the worst part of her and that is why you can't
know for sure if your dream girl is an Angel yet. So
take it slow and steady. #BabaGoSlow

5. Don't take women for granted:
Never take a woman for granted because she can
do worst of acts when you push her 2 d wall. Dnt cheat on her and if u do, keep it away from her. I repeat dnt let her find out. If u do, u re dead. That's the worst sin you could do to a lady. So respect them when they give you their
hearts.

6. Women can love with all their hearts:
Women are better than Men when it comes to showing love. Be it for money or true love (even though I don't believe it exist), women love with their hearts. Play your cards well and you will get everything from her...dnt cheat on her ooo, I'm saying it again

7. Don't compare your woman with another:
Women are Jealous creatures and they hate it when you compare then with other women. Praise her and show her that she is better than any other woman. Do that without mentioning any name coz if u do, she will think you have eyes on dat lady you mentioned.

Finally treat them well and they will return the favor
multiple times in so many ways....I love you my lady....#ValarMorgulis

bandol:
85

Oboi! u need vitamins A and K wella

gateleo:
85

OMG! Are u blind

Mariecakes:
donate money for the cake.. meanwhile manage this 1st cake, when you donate money, you get the suit cake

dey are amazing! U really make dis cakes?