₦airaland Forum

hensben:
FDJ will even turn worse than VDB, that guy don’t have the temple to play in epl.

Trash.

andrewbaba44:
When you have players like gavi and pedri you will understand that you can do without de Jong and the money from United will just look like a free money

Not taking away anything from de Jong man is a top class player and you guys will enjoy him at United ,we need to balance our wage book also ,dude is on 354k weekly at Barca and it will be increased to 400k if he remains here next season ,those kind wages aren’t needed at Barca anymore .

Nike pays half of De Jong salary at Barca.

Unlimited22:
Lol the same BET that wanted to make him come backstage to get an award years ago?

Had no idea about that.

Wizkid can dey form big boy. The werey did not attend BET Show to collect his award.

One thing about Ten Hagg is his ability to create a system and adopt to the players available at his disposal.


One Season he plays with a false 9 in Tadic, the other with a target man in Haller.
One Season he plays with a 10 in Donny who is more of a goalscorer, then another o with Berghuis who is more a playmaker
One year he play with a real winger at Right wing like Antony, the other with Ziyech who is more like a playmaker.
Timber is a whole different type of central defender than Matthijs de Ligt.
Every one would have thought creating a combination of two slow players in blind and tadic down the wings would have been a bad idea but they were incredibly deadly just last season.

I was talking about Eth and wanting De Jong Specially. You jumped into my mention talking about two out of point examples that had no relation or even context with my post . I shut them down only for you to start another argument within the examples you cooked up. I can't deal at all.

ChristoBam:
You're just going about arguing like a kid. Man said took an L on Pogba. Was there an argument about Pogba and Mourinho?

Seems like arguments to you is not about Facts, it's just about who has the last say and who's more jobless.

Everyone with a brain following the argument from the beginning and that has said anything about it, knows it's about Maguire and Ole.

Kk.

TrebleChamp:
Oga you have seen screenshot of Ole telling you Maguire was his no 1 target, wetin you still dey argue this deal for? Ole signed Maguire, made him captain almost immediately. That he turned out shit doesn't change anything about who asked for him to be signed..

Managers praise new signings all the time and talk about how they wanted them even when it's the opposite. Mourinho was praising Pogba to high heavens, Mourinho did the same thing with Fred, Conte was praising and talking about morata as his choice when he actually wanted lukaku etc

This is literally like when we went for sancho the summer we couldn't get him due to fees disagreement with Dortmund and then Ole got sacked midway in the season with a new coach coming in and getting sancho the next season. Then you proceed to say the new coach identity him and is his signing lol. It's crazy I have been going back and forth on this. Am done !!

ChristoBam:
What's the argument about?
What's with the dribbling
I mentioned Pogba in the first post because he was also an expensive signing but that was inaccurate because Mourinho obviously didn't want him.

But what you argued with wasn't Pogba and Mourinho. We wouldn't be having this argument it it was. You Fvcking said Maguire wasn't Ole's signing and that's the reason for all the back and forths.

Both examples you gave of Pogba/ Mourinho and Ole/Maguire was totally wrong not just the Pogba own that you already accepted was nonsense. United was already interested in Maguire under the previous manager and causally went back for him under Ole after missing out on his first target. Ole had no problems with signing Maguire so didn't object to the club returning back for him after watching him. Maguire was signed under Ole tenure but he never identified Maguire or anything like you falsely claimed. Same way you willingly took your L on the Pogba goof should be the same for Maguire.

MRTA7:
I'm just quoting what he said on skysports.

He said nothing about the club saying "No"on sky sports.

ChristoBam:
Lmao when I talked about Mourinho and Pogba and Maguire and Ole, what was your reply that started the whole argument?

You literally quoted me back with Maguire and Ole and that's what started the whole argument.

Don't start dribbling my talking about my initial post of Pogba when that's not the point of argument.

We didn't use 3 pages of this thread arguing about Pogba and Mourinho

Why did you mention me In the first place talking about Pogba/Mourinho and Ole/Maguire?

MRTA7:
The club literally said no to Mourinho when he asked for Maguire to be signed the summer before he was sacked.

Jose said this when he was a pundit on Sky.

Mourinho was the one who actually vetoed the transfer.

ChristoBam:
You think I'd argue with you if your point of argument was Mourinho and Pogba? I'm not one for relentless arguments.

Like I said 3 posts back. What I don't want to hear is Maguire wasn't Ole's signing.

You were the one who brought Mourinho and Pogba into this discussion for no good reason. Now that your example as failed you have started blickering. Same as Pogba with Mourinho is the same as Maguire and Ole. Ole didn't identify Maguire same as Mourinho didn't identify Pogba like you shamelessly claimed yesterday. United would have signed Maguire with or without Ole being the coach as he was already the club target under the previous manager.

ChristoBam:
This is what happens when you argue just for the sake of it.

Mourinho never wanted Pogba. Pogba was a former United player that went to Juve and was bought back fot obvious reasons.

And the fact that you mentioned Mbappe shows it's kinda pointless to argue with you. Like we're run in the same way.

Yesterday it was Mourinho identified Pogba today you have jumped to Mourinho never wanted Pogba. Why the hell am I even wasting my time?

Mourinho identified Pogba!!

Ole identified Maguire!!

Next will be Ancelotti identified Mbappe after watching Psg lose against Madrid and liked him!!

Players the club have been scouting and targeting before either of those coaches even came in. Am done ha beg.

ChristoBam:
Quoting me all night. Brought out receipt, e don become 'rest please'.

Maguire wasn't Ole's signing

Nigga you have literally been typing out of point all through it's getting tiring. Let's recap...
I said this concerning Eth wanting De Jong. Eth is solely the reason why united are going for De jong.

Bombblacks:
Ten Hagg has identified a key player he wants to build the midfield with and United are determined to give it to him yet some of you are complaining. I can never understand some of you at all.

You replied with this false equivalence saying Mourinho identified Pogba and Ole identified Maguire which was totally stupid cause both situations had no resemblance whatsoever. United would have signed both Pogba and Maguire without both coaches as they were already interested in getting them unlike in this case where getting De Jong is solely due to Eth request.

ChristoBam:
Lol just like Mourinho identified Pogba and Ole identified Maguire.

How can Ole identify a player United has scouted before he even became coach and was already interested in buying under the previous manager. I don't have time for this back and forth waste of time.

hensben:
You are the one not making sense. As I said, his one dollar was not in the purchase of Hazard and Madrid will still win major trophies with or without Hazard. Hazard is just one of their super star collection over the years. Injury happened to Hazard and it can happen to any player so if he is not an I diot he should know that by now. If he is not stupid, nobody talk down on his injured player in that manner.

You are still making zero sense and typing without content. The Chelsea fans complaining about Lukaku did they contribute any money in getting him? So if Chelsea sign a player for 100million plus and for three years contributed almost nothing to the club due to underperforming or injury should the fans not complain.

ChristoBam:
It was when you mentioned Mbappe, I knew you had no idea of what you're saying.

Like I said, you're still thinking the same one direction. The player has to have played with him in the past or has to be a signing from a backwater club for him to pass as the Manager's signing.

Every fvcking player Ole signed apart from Ronaldo was his signing.

You can argue with the man himself

I can't believe this nigga is still on this. Bro rest please

ChristoBam:
Seriously you're the one looking for direct and exact correlation in every comparison made.

It doesn't matter if we were linked to him in the past. Ole came in and identified him as someone he wants in his team.

Ole didn't ask for a defender and they went for the previous choice. That's a huge twist of facts to push your narrative. He went for who he wanted. Maguire wasn't a gem from one small club in Italy. He was a popular player placed on the market with interests from other clubs. And Ole went for him.


I guess if we had signed Nunez, you'd say Ten Hag didn't sign him right?

A Manager's signing can be a previous target of the club like Maguire was. Nunez has been a target of the club since January. If Ten Hag comes in and signs him, he's Ten Hag signing. Simple!

Please stop confusing yourself cause you are beginning to sound ridiculous. De ligt was Ole first choice but united couldn't get him so they went for their previous targets in Maguire. Clubs sign players not managers unless the coach makes a direct request for a particular player and the clubs get it like how United are moving for De jong or how Chelsea got Jorginho for Sarri etc. Your previous examples of Pogba with Mourinho and Maguire with Ole was all wrong. How can a club sign a player they have been scouting for a long time and had previous interest in before even getting the new coach and then you proceed to say it's the new manger who identify him and it's his signing lol. It's like Madrid getting Mbappe and you then saying Ancelotti identified him and he is Ancelotti signing lol.

hensben:
Madrid don’t even need messi or Ronaldo or mbappe to win those trophies. Madrid is Madrid. Hazard is just one of their super star collection over the years so I don’t know why that I diot was crying more than the club that bought him.

You are still not making any sense. So a Madrid fan should be happy that his club paid 100million plus for a player that has contributed almost nothing in more 3years of joining the club?

ChristoBam:
Na you dey talk plenty talks for real.
Maguire didn't need to play for Ole in the past for him to be Ole's signing.
Ole came into the club and said that expensive defender is who he wants.

The mistake you're making is you think because United has been linked with Maguire before, he wasn't Ole's signing. Do you know how many players we're linked with?

Ole signed Maguire not considering the risk and the money involved. He then made him captain few months later. He's his signing, full stop!!

You said Old identified Maguire in relation to Eth and De Jong not that we signed Maguire during Ole tenure. Ole didn't identify Maguire or bring him to the boards attention as someone he wants . Mourinho already wanted Maguire the previous season so the board was already interested, so when Ole asked for a defender they went back for their previous target after missing out on his choice. It's a silly example to even bring up when talking about De jong who ETH singlehandedly demanded for as a key signing and player needed. A player he knows personally and was a beast under him. You think Mourinho wanted and was interested in Maguire then left and the next coach came in and still demanded for the same Maguire? Bro leave all these plenty talks

hensben:
With or without Hazard they have gotten their money back in 100 folds ny winning those trophies.

Why bring trophies won into the discussion when the player In question contributed close to nothing? So basically they would have had an extra 100million on top of the trophies and money made from Winning those trophies . You re basically agreeing that Madrid don't need hazard and he has been a waste of money.

hensben:
If only you have sense. The club have gotten times 3 of Hazard’s signing fee back by winning ucl, 2 la liga, copa de Roy and super cup. Club wc and super cup is on the way.

They won all those things with almost zero contribution from hazard. This part of your post makes zero sense.

ChristoBam:
I'd agree ETH really persuaded him if he's against staying back at Barca.

Or I'd agree if other clubs like City were in for him and he decided to choose United.

Why will he be against staying at Barca? By persuade it means he has no problem with joining United and working under Eth which doesn't mean he is against staying at Barca as well.

ChristoBam:
Lol do you know how many players we've been scouting before Ole joined?

He came in and chose the one he loved and they stuck by the choice no matter the price involved.

Maguire joined and Ole made him captain in few months. That says a lot.

. The two situations are not even remotely close. Ole was not the reason united signed Maguire,the interest has always been there. De Jong is 100% Eth signing and have even called him to persuade and change his mind. We have seen De jong perform under Eth and was a beast. Like I said, leave all these plenty talks.

ChristoBam:
Oh, who signed Maguire?

United have been scouting Maguire way before Ole even took charge. Let's leave that discussion.

ChristoBam:
He doesn't want to join. It's simple. Everyone knows this.

But what'll he do if Barca wants to sell. His decision depends on what Barca decides. He's not against it.

Eth already called him to persuade him and he has agreed to join. Once fee with Barca is agreed, everything will be done.

ChristoBam:
Lol just like Mourinho identified Pogba and Ole identified Maguire. It's the same all over again. This is even worse because the player doesn't even want join.

Ole didn't identify Maguire and nothing you have written is accurate. De jong has agreed to join united thanks to Ten hagg and just agreeing fee with Barca is all that's remaining.

Ten Hagg has identified a key player he wants to build the midfield with and United are determined to give it to him yet some of you are complaining. I can never understand some of you at all.

andrewbaba44:
You blind to see the star studded team nah

No be my fault say you begin to Dey watch ball yesterday

How much did Madrid spend under Mourinho in 3 years? You are typing unrelated nonsense. How can somebody spend 150million in 3 years and you say he "assembled ". Maybe you just don't understand English and how to use words. Peace

andrewbaba44:
Mourinho Madrid signings

Angel di maria : The best player in the Portuguese league signed for 30 million euros ,won the champions league with Madrid as a crucial player but mourinho couldn’t win it with him

Ozil : signed for Madrid by Jose after his performance at the 2010 fifa World Cup ,he didn’t cost more than 20 million though ,the rest is history .

Khedira: signed after his performance at the 2010 World Cup ,signed for 15 million or so

Ricardo carvalho : He was already old when he joined Madrid but still a world class player ,didn’t cost more than 8 million euros because of age and his contract is about to expire at Chelsea

Luca modric :Signed for 40 million euros and the rest is history

Varane ,Fabio coentrao and some others sha

Jose signed all these players added to the ones they have like Cr7 Ramos Pepe Marcelo Benzema Higuain

No doubt that Jose is a great coach and one of the best ,but he didn’t win the champions league with these players and many of these players won the champions league at that same Madrid with other coach ,but we should be trolling guardiola always and not mourinho

these squad was even stronger than guardiola Barca somehow .

Many of una here no Kuku sabi anything

Stop typing unrelated things. So once again Mourinho did not assemble anything like you friend falsely claimed before right?