₦airaland Forum

China Railways vs Nigeria Railways


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VkcatfsCN4A?si=-Y1OK-JQg7V7_0Oj

There is hope.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Nigeria/s/znmCciAubL

Pete Hegseth, Donald Trump's nominee for US defence secretary, was confirmed by the Senate late on Friday night, after facing misconduct allegations that nearly derailed his confirmation.

Vice-President JD Vance cast the tie-breaking vote in Hegseth's favour, after three Republican senators, including former Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell, voted against him.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cdd9zpj13q9o

basilico:
Can't even get your facts straight The link you posted was me saying COVID was bioengineered.

The link I posted showed you lying I said what I never said!

advanceDNA:
Since we are taking this issue seriously.... You will be hearing from my lawyers

Let your lawyers know that my divorce of you is unconditional please, and I don't want any of your assets as I have enough of my own.

basilico:
I didn't include it because you dismissed sceptics of zoonotic origin then.

You did not include it because it does not support your lies and you did not want it seen that you were lying.

I have not made any claims about the origin of covid because I do not have sufficient data on which to base a claim unlike you who bases everything on a maga mules2000 conspiracy.

advanceDNA:
Lol...come on!! .....affect you ?? As in?? Its just chit chat, no one really cares weda you are man or woman here...u could even identify as two legged donkey

I don't do "just chit chat". I have the problem of not being able to disengage my brain when discussing with people here because not using my brain is like me disrespecting you, which I would rather not do.

If you don't care about my gender, perhaps stop using it to frame your understanding of what I write that you read.

Kobojunkie:
In every society, the one thing that is common to all is the Law— well, ought to be. So, when I insist on commonsense, I at least mean that which is in complete compliance with common law —fundamental human rights of every human being on the planet included, of course.

So, as for the comments by the other poster, we clearly see that he thinks he is in his right to argue against the right of another, clearly anti-common-sense there.

Common, as in widely freely available to all.

The evidence does not support the commonality of sense, I don't think, and is only acquired by those who put the effort in to rise above commonality.

But as I said, your use is the correct use, and I am just not common. And nor do I think you are common going by the evidence.

IjeBos:
And now states would have to stand up ....

I was thinking of you as I read this.

Maga got you so involved in their stupid game so you'd miss the trees in the forest, I fear.

It’s hard to see in a blizzard. When so much is coming at you, one thing after another, it becomes impossible to discern anything but a blur. You become disoriented and lose your balance. If that was the aim of Donald Trump’s first 100 hours in office, it’s definitely working.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/jan/24/donald-trump-executive-orders-autocrat-limitless-power

Kobojunkie:
You don't get to decide what people can or cannot do.The world does not revolve around your particular preferences even in marriage. Learn this and gain necessary wisdom for yourself! 🙄🙄🙄

Would you understand if I claimed his sense is common?

Its so common it could easily have been picked off the street.

advanceDNA:
U ddnt deny though.... so I wasn't blinded cos I was referring to you

You are blinded.

You have no idea what my gender is, and I have no need to tell you since your assumption does not affect me one tiny iota.

Download copy here

https://archive.org/details/animalfarm-E

And after reading George Orwell's Animal Farm, also read his 1984 (or, Big Brother, as I call it), to gain further understanding.

https://archive.org/details/dli.ernet.240835

You've been having sleepless night, so you contacted the National Orientation Agency using the address on the appointment letter you received to enquire what to do next so you could have sleepy nights?

In fact, did the appointment letter not tell you what the next step was?

Wallade:
The bible has no notable and significant record or Mary (mother Jesus) background and parents.

Mary was not extensively discussed in the bible. She and Joseph were more relevant in the pre-birth of Jesus

Show us if you think otherwise and please quote the bible references to buttress your points.

This is what happens when you read only one book instead of every word that proceeds from God's mouth so to speak.

When Mary was three years old, Joachim and Anne, her parents, in fulfillment of her divine promise, brought Mary to the Temple of Jerusalem, where they left her to be brought up, which is like putting her in boarding school to learn.

https://www.britannica.com/biography/Saints-Anne-and-Joachim

cococandy:
What a profoundly stupid comment to make to say fema was not working. All the people who’ve had disasters in the recent years fixed it all themselves. Maximal ignorance

Does he not always make profoundly stupid comments due to his maximal ignorance?

Maeve7:
So because I used the word Nazi, you decided to speak on behalf of all Jews? Nazis are all about Jews in your brain?

I've been noticing this ignorance all over the place and makes me want to scream.

But I'm not fooled we don't want to make America white, and not again, because America has never ever been white.

....the Nazis targeted for discrimination and persecution, anyone they believed threatened their ideal of a ‘pure Aryan race’.

Nazi beliefs categorised people by race, and Hitler used the word ‘Aryan’ for his idea of a ‘pure German race’. The Nazis believed Aryan people were superior to all others. Their devotion to what they believed was racial purity and their opposition to racial mixing partly explains their hatred towards Jews, Roma and Sinti people and black people. Slavic people, such as those from Poland and Russia, were considered inferior and were targeted because they lived in areas needed for German expansion.

The Nazis wanted to ‘improve’ the genetic make-up of the population and so persecuted people they deemed to be disabled, either mentally or physically, as well as gay people. Political opponents, primarily communists, trade unionists and social democrats, as well as those whose religious beliefs conflicted with Nazi ideology, such as Jehovah’s Witnesses, were also targeted for persecution.

Hundreds of thousands of lives were destroyed because of Nazi persecution of other groups, and many groups did not receive acknowledgement of their suffering until years after 1945.

https://hmd.org.uk/learn-about-the-holocaust-and-genocides/nazi-persecution/

Wallade:
Tell us what you know about Mary and how she educated Jesus Christ.

Please quite bible references.

Tell us the part of bible that told you Mary's parents and background.

Don't you think you should answer my questions first, or at least say you can't before asking me to answer your questions?

Kobojunkie:
I kinda assume it ought to be common sense like making sure to invest only when you are sure of returns and whatnot.

This "common sense" thing always causes issues between you and I, and we quarrel over it.

Sense that is common is nonsense in my own book, and that's why its common and most have it.

Superior sense, which is what I am seeing you are describing people should have before marrying, is not common, and requires effort to acquire, which is why most don't have it and therefore don't do the things you are describing they should do before marrying, and why their marriages often fail.

Your posts are not based on common sense, kobo. You have, in my opinion, done the work to have superior sense to that which the common people have.

Do note your use of the phrase "common sense" is as is accepted it is. I just have a different definition, so the fault for our disagreeing is entirely mine.

Helpout12345:
A woman that does not want to be fffucked and fffucked, should stay single and not married.

Same way a man that is not ready to pay bills should not marry, otherwise woman will turn his mental state upside down.

Sounds like you want to marry an ashewo, so your money for table, her back for ground.

You do know some women work and help with the bills, right? And some even pay all the bills while the man sits on his ass.

Is it ok for him not to get and sex therefore?

Kobojunkie:
It is not about being hyper-intelligent but being extra careful when picking a match in a relationship.

2. Those, you cannot do anything about.

3. There are those and that is why folks should be grateful for divorce in such cases.

Extra careful, in my opinion, requires brain use and intelligence, I'd think.

advanceDNA:
...but u want to remain in the marriage and pull your feminists shiit that u have a right to refuse sex as long as u want....

Actually, if you'd bothered reading the article you'd note she filed for a divorce, but the reason you never saw that is, I am a woman, I am a feminist, I blinded you.

Wallade:
"Mary educated Jesus", this is a ridiculous theory

It is, isn't it. But lets check, shall we, or rather, lets check your Bible knowledge.

Was Mary from an educated family?

Could she read?

Did she quote from a book?

Answers please.

How can China be socialist if it has a stock market?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4__IBd_sGE?si=wUt-xnCSs4JoN4XP

Kobojunkie:
These are some of the questions that couples need to resolve before marriage as many enter marriage pretending it is a sort of open contract when in fact it isn't meant to be any such.

I think you are asking that people be hyper intelligent before entering marriage.

Should stupid ignorant people not marry?

What about dishonest people? After all, this man was likely not "prioritizing his career over family life and been bad-tempered and insulting" before they married.

Nonexisting1:
Any man that lives in that room should put his dick inside freezer for now and continue hustling until heaven smiles on him. I'm not dictating for him, it's just common sense. If he is married and they insist on having children, they should move to Cameroun. We have enough poor out-of-school children already, we don't need more kidnappers and more armed robbers, and most especially, more vote sellers.

I think you mean an ambitious man, "should put his dick inside freezer for now and continue hustling until heaven smiles on him".

And what if heaven never smiles on the man. Should he never marry?

Namaster:
First of all, NEITHER the judgement nor my opinion is on the issue of RAPE.

The judgement goes to the matter of "NO-FAULT DIVORCE".

In a No-Fault Divorce, the LESS financially-bouyant spouse (usually the woman) is ENTITLED to benefits like alimony and HALF the Marital (aka the man's) assets.

The point of securing the a divorce judgement where the court acknowledged that the woman was at FAULT is to prevent her from DENYING him sex and still TAKING his money and property.

NOBODY is advocating for rape!
NOT me!

And NOT the French courts that made the initial judgement that the woman was at FAULT so she had to run to a European Court of Human Rights to secure this SHADY judgement.

NO court in the WHOLE of France would grant her a NO-FAULT divorce.
That's why she ran to the ECHR.

NO-FAULT Divorce = MO' money.
FAULT Divorce = NO money.

That's what the case is about.

It is your response that made the provision of sex sound mandatory that made me bring up marital rape.

The fault determines the payout, and the woman being at fault means she gets paid less, which is what the appeal court overturned in this case.

Is it your opinion that she deserves less or nothing because she denied himsex, even though he would have deprived her by "prioritizing his career over family life and been bad-tempered and insulting"?

Should I let him fuq me because he is my husband, even though he is bad-tempered towards me and insulting?

Namaster:
Sex is one of the CARDINAL component of any marriage.

When you marry someone, it means you expect to fuccck them and ONLY them for the rest of your life.

That means you are committing to get your SUPPLY of sex from only ONE source for the foreseeable future.

If your spouse SUDDENLY cuts off your supply of sex, they are ABUSING you.

And do you think that should give you the right to force open the supply and take all the sex you want?

If so, what's your opinion of spousal rape?

Nonexisting1:
Na the same different goals keep us in the mess we are in this country now. The couple in that room will breed like rabbits because sex is all most poor people think about and tomorrow, their children will grow poor to the age of 18 and then sell their votes to bring in another Buhari as president. At that time, their 'different goal' which you think is personal will become a public problem.

But come on!

Would you like me to dictate what other people do? Like my preference of everyone going for a marriage competency test to get a license to marry, and a child bearing licence to fuq, and read the Bible and Quran to graduate from secondary school, and learn science till first degree to mention just a few?

I personally wouldn't mind imposing my own goals on people, but I doubt you'd like it.

advanceDNA:
So who should be blamed for refusing to have sex with her husband..?? The state?? Her husband??

That's an odd rephrase of the question.

If I don't want to have sex with you my husband, indeed "blame" me. I am after all responsible for my choice not to have sex with you, though on deeper investigation it might be because you are actually lousy at sex or I just don't love you no more.

But the question here is, is it my duty to let you fuq me because we are married even if I don't want you to?

Nonexisting1:
The right question should be, how can a man stay in this room and think of marriage? He must be smoking more than my monkey does.

Different different peoples na im de.

"Different people have different goals" means that each individual has their own unique aspirations, desires, and objectives in life, which can vary greatly depending on their personal circumstances, values, and life experiences; essentially, what one person wants to achieve might be completely different from what another person wants to accomplish."