₦airaland Forum

DissTroy:
So, let's say there's a flood and you're trapped for weeks in a bunker with your friend with no food, you can go cannibalistic on him. And when the flood recedes, and it is found it, that life-threatening hunger would stand up as defense.

Does it make sense as an excuse? No! It shouldn't make sense because we are humane but the Idaho law excuses it.

DissTroy:
From denying cannibalism isn't allowed in Idaho under any circumstances even with evidence posted to shifting goalposts to it being probably when the person eaten is dead (necrophagia) to arguing repeatedly what you think are life-threatening circumstances even though everyone knows what those cricumstances are hunger-wise.

DissTroy:
The part about Buda eating DissTróy and dedicating it is your sly attempt at being funny while blurring the inferred meaning points.

DissTroy:
You can't be punished by the same law that gives an excuse to commit such a heinous crime. A punishment is meted out ONLY when you are found guilty. But you can't be if it's under those cricumstances.

Melanin07:
Send me your Naira coin wallet address and I will send you right now free 2,000,000 naira coin.

I will also post here the screenshot for everyone to see the transaction. Everything in blockchain is public.

DissTroy:
By any definition, whether the person is dead or alive, if you eat it, it is cannibalism.

DissTroy:
Budaatum feels the need to force a narrative which isn't flying.

DissTroy:
(anybody who is willful enough to eat another human being has no conscience really)

DissTroy:
If anyone else was being needlessly obstinate and selectively blind, I'd either ignore or just go on to hit them hard.

I have explained countless times what constitutes life-threatening conditions, even using analogies of being trapped in a bunker without food for weeks, a famine or extreme hunger with no other way out but death or eating anything.

I understand your tactics when you lose the discuss is to be ingratiating, to keep asking the same questions a thousand times in a thousand ways just so the person you are debating wears out and just abandons the argument while you have the last word to force a false narrative of how the debate went and the points eludicated or highlighted.

You know what are life-threatening conditions of hunger. Everyone on this thread knows. The law knows. Ask the man down he street and he knows. But Budaatum feels the need to force a narrative which isn't flying.

That is the issue I keep pointing when having back-and-forths with you - whataboutism. Always dancing around the point or fire but never admitting to the obvious heat.

CJust:
Hey! do you know the pacman in the pacman game, just know that the game editor icon looks like the pacman
This are the topics we are to begin with
--<<Introductory to the following listed>>--
1.background of game editor Y and X co-ordinal point
2.about the control panel or actor control
3.about event and actions
4.about the Menu
5.about the actor View

CJust:
Do you want to become a game creator ok i suggest this forum who take you to the right place
just download game editor either 1.4.0 or 1.4.1

DissTroy:
That is you, a victim of conscience. Like all humane people should be victims of conscience.

Trevor007007:
Good morning Buda, hope you slept well?

DissTroy:
But if you contest it you would walk free. All your lawyer has to do is prove you were in those conditions according to the law.

DissTroy:
But cannibalism should be clear-cut once there's evidence it was done. Like rápe, you can't rape in self-defense or life-threatening conditions. Once it's proven you raped, the reason is immaterial - it should be swift punishment.

DissTroy:
So, let's say there's a flood and you're trapped for weeks in a bunker with your friend with no food, you can go cannibalistic on him.

DissTroy:
The Indonesian(?) should kids who got trapped in an underground cave for weeks were in life-threatening conditions. If it were in Idaho and there was cannibalism, a lawyer would argue and defend the perpetrators' right to freedom.

You get it now? Actually, you do but whataboutism has to live on, yes?

DissTroy:
The law, as any law expert with tell you, isn't about justice or what's right - it's mostly about arguing agreed rules and precedences. The "rules" here would be cannibalism under life-threatening conditions.

Tamaratonye1:
So all those words above for the profound insight of "read the bible"?

Tamaratonye1:
Question: did you read the Koran like a child and did it provoke your brain into action as much as the bible? How about Avesta? The texts of all other religions? Which was the most action-provoking?

DissTroy:
The main issue should be why for any reason should something as heinous as cannibalism be excused in any place, especially the U.S., instead of cannibalism being treated worse than murder and even - this isn't stretching it - punished with a life for a life.

That cannibalism is obviously legal and exucsed doesn't concern you. You don't have to jump at every discussion if you don't have intelligent contributions to make or veer off it if it doesn't contribute to the roundness of the discussions.

sanpipita:
I said item 2 was a viable defense for certain circumstances you then go on using your second paragraph to agree to what I said but again I'm lying shameless, maybe English is hard for you I can't tell.

Anyway you can go to Idaho and cannibalize let's see how far item 2 takes you in court

DissTroy:
Stop lying shameless and adding what isn't there. This is exactly what Buda does - whataboutism.

The punishment for cannibalism in Idaho is 14 years imprisonment if found guilty but according to Chapter 50, Item 2, if your defense is that you did it under life threatening conditions (which I have stated some as examples), you haven't committed a crime. That clause is the caveat for handing down guilty sentences.

You can't be punished by the same law that gives an excuse to commit such a heinous crime. A punishment is meted out ONLY when you are found guilty. But you can't be if it's under those cricumstances.

Had pill to swallow, I know. I was just as much in disbelief when I came upon it long ago.

What if I post links and evidence of Western countries which have legalised bestiality? You'd be dumbfounded then.

azraeljaheel:
psalm 78:25

Trevor007007:
No I don't, but I do know that even if you decide to clamore for unity by protest your words goes no where

Trevor007007:
General Maximus the distroyer, even the one challenging you knows in his heart you speak the truth, but he will still counter you with more unfruitful arguements, last election I heard how some misgruntled god of men where busy claiming that Jesus Christ is a politician, twisting details from the Bible to cover there Hypocrisy, what this fellow is doing and his cohorts is not different from what the god of men today is doing.

benalvino3:
i am trying to understand why you think whites are being taught differently from blacks so.
you statement below is implying that blacks don't get the same education as whites.

ono:
This is truly sickening and horrific!! The US has been taken over by vile evil beings. This is what buda and his ilk, lovers of the Fruited Plains, wants running in the US.

benalvino3:
bullshit. segregation is a thing of the past. a lot of Nigerians go to abroad to study. if they are not being taught at the same standards the next white guy, then why are they flocking over there?

benalvino3:
buda, How is it possible for 100 people to be in a class, 50 blacks and 50 whites and some how the blacks who are in the same maths class with the whites are being taught differently?

Pastafari:
You claim that the universe could have started from nothing. We are equally making claims.
You simply provide evidence for why the universe could start from nothing, let's see how that refutes my claim.

Pastafari:
Do you have evidence that nothing created the universe?

benalvino3:
also, the book implies that blacks and latinx cannot compete with whites so they need equity in maths.......