₦airaland Forum

mrphysics:
canadaorbust.

I told you but you wouldn't here. It's only the irrational PDP supporters that will see the judgment of Bayelsa State and think IMO State will go their way simply because they are PDP

Though it dismissed the application, the apex court refused to award cost against the Applicants.

However, a member of the apex court panel, Justice Centus Chima Nweze, disagreed with the lead verdict and gave a dissenting opinion that allowed Ihedioha’s application.

Nweze said he was satisfied that the judgement that declared Uzodinma winner was entered in error.

He held that the apex court has a duty to in the interest of justice, set-aside its decision that was given in error.

ntyce:
Legendary reviewer of the supreme Court, how far?

Your kindred and PDP were asking for something impossible and they got it.

The SC was clearly wrong or compromised or both.
There is no law that says they shouldn’t see the clearly fraudulent nature of the documents right in front of them.

Also notice how they carefully did not mention numbers in their judgement, in a case that’s all about numbers! For same reason they dared not mention meeting the constitutionally mandated geographical spread - because they know the numbers make no sense - the man gave himself more votes than there are voters! Same reason INEC dared not give the final tally of votes as they did in Bayelsa and all others - they’d be laughed at!

Iyiataata92:
The pastor is an idiot. He should have used krest instead of alcohol. If krest was used, the girl will wait for 20 years before exposing him.


BTW, Mr OP is that the photo of the 17 year old girl or your side chick's photo. I'm not understanding

And common sense should tell u that if she was lying her anger would quickly dissipate. But if she is still angry and still willing to tell the same story to the world after 20years then it is probably true - people hate having to tell a lie twice

All eye service. How can spraying a person make him less of corona. Even temperature gauge is eye service. Only good remedy is authomatic quarantine

eyescue:
Oh.. .let this not be true. If you see how people die everyday because of this, then you will understand that we need God's intervention

It will never be like that in 9ja - our weather is too hot

Revman:
Did you read that judgement? I don't have strength for argument. That judgement was sound based on the facts before the court and no other.

I read relevant parts of the judgment. It was not sound at all - there is no law that says they shouldn’t see the clearly fraudulent nature of the documents right in front of them.
In fact the SC was clearly wrong or compromised or both.
Notice how they carefully did not mention numbers in their judgement, in a case that’s all about numbers! For same reason they dared not mention meeting the constitutionally mandated geographical spread - because they know the numbers make no sense - the man gave himself more votes than there are voters! Same reason INEC dared not give the final tally of votes as they did in Bayelsa and all others - they’d be laughed at!

Revman:
This Ihedioha you are rooting for has unclean hands. He rigged and manipulated results in Mbaise. I don't want to speak further on the issue but those who are aware are very much aware that all these people rigged their way. It was a question of who rig pass. I repeat, Ihedioha should go and remove the log in his eye before he attempts to remove the speck in another's eye.

But he did not go to Supreme Court to uphold him. See, the SC is meant to be the epitome of justice, beyond reproach. If even the SC rewards blatant cheating and forgery then it’s all over.
There are errors and shenanigans in most elections. That’s why u don’t lightly change the umpire’s declared result.

Different if Uzodinma were already the governor and the SC did not want to overheat things. But, NO, they overruled all lower courts AND INEC itself in order to replace an already 8-month governor with a 4th place finisher, all based on clearly fraudulent documents!

SocialJustice:
Ihedioha is just wasting the money he should use for retirement.

If he is, he is doing it for a good cause. How can he tell his children not to lie and cheat if this judgement is let stand?
Also it’s for people like u - so you’d continue to have a say in who governs u, instead of whoever fills out INEC result sheets

deboysben:
hope on who?

Tanko...
better hope on better thing.
It is already a done deal.

I think Tanko took orders from APC/Buhari. But he is not the only justice; I believe others’d be more objective

deboysben:
sorry I misunderstood you before.

But I have modified.

Cool. I believe Tanko himself is compromised beyond redemption; let’s hope the other justices restore sanity

deboysben:
This is a litmus test given to Tanko Mohammed again

Was just buttressing your point below:

deboysben:
there is different between stolen mandate and someone having unmerited favor due one's reckless making.

You should blame your party leaders.

tuniski:
kudos jare your head is very correct

Thank u jare

Sikay19:
You were happy when the SC upheld their judgement on Bayelsa. But you want the SC to make u turn in your favour. Redeem kor, Winners ni.

Here are the adverse fallouts if that embarrassment of a judgement in Imo is let stand.
State the adverse fallouts from Bayelsa

(1) U can no longer tell Nigerians that lying and cheating does not pay when they can see for themselves that the highest court in the land rewards blatant cheating and forgery.
(2) By the precedent set there, any candidate able to obtain INEC documents (usually ruling party candidates) can write any result they wish and the Supreme Court must accept those results no matter how fraudulent or defective they may be, inevitably leading to a one-party country

deboysben, OZAOEKPE

mrphysics:
Lol, you are already preparing for your loss. I decided not to respond to your previous mention the other day until SC decides today.

Anticipate that they make reference to Bayelsa state judgment where they said they must be an end to litigation.

Wake up bro

The SC itself put up this list not me. Point is they can rehear and set aside same case.
The Supreme Court has the power to set aside its judgement, and rehear same under the following circumstances:
1. Where there is a clerical mistake in the judgement or Order,
2. Where there is an error arising from an accidental slip or omission,
3. Where there arises the necessity for carrying out its own meaning and to make its intention plain,
4. Where any of the parties obtained judgement by fraud or deceit;
5. Where such a decision is a nullity,
6. Where it is obvious that the Court was misled into giving the decision under a wrong belief that the parties consented to it,
7. When the judgement was given without jurisdiction,
8. Where the procedure adopted was such as to deprive the decision or judgement of the character of a legitimate adjudication,
9. Where the writ or application was not served on the other party, or there is denial of fair hearing and
10. Where the decision/judgement is contrary to public policy and will perpetuate injustice.

NinjaMetahuman:
google singapore


Average weather in singapore is 35'c while average weather in Nigeria is 30'c.

Singapore has more than 90 comfirmed cases of Corona virus and counting.

But no deaths and many have recovered but most importantly, they speak Chinese and have constant traffic with China. In Italy, northern cold areas have almost all the corona

globemoney:
You continue showing 2 cases which are very unrelated to this case to show the supreme court can reverse its decision. Dont worry after 3pm today you will rest. This matter is done and dusted. Again there has to be an end to litigation!!!!! Especially election cases... Stop deceiving yourself

Sir, u learnt something today. Let it rest. U have been shown the SC can reverse itself and has listed conditions under which it will do exactly that

Judybash93:
UAE

The UAE has only 21 cases, none has died, 5 have recovered. All probably connected to Iran

globemoney:
If they set aside the judgement, hope will still approach the supreme court to seek review on the judgement because their is no place the constitution allows the Supreme court to review it's judgement, also their is a time frame for election cases which has since elasped so you see why there has to be an end to litigation, unless the supreme court wants to continue entertaining reviews on this case..

Uzodimma's lawyer clearly told the supreme court they have no jurisdiction to hear this case!

You keep parroting end to litigation; u have been shown SC can and has severally reversed itself. They are HUMANS in a FALIBLE world

openmine:
Just because you have shown me what you believe does not imply i completely agree with you!
I am free to make my own analysis and opinion...Okay?

It is not what I believe.
The SC itself put up that list not me. Point is they can rehear and set aside same case

globemoney:
And you think the supreme court has jurisdiction over this case? lol.. There has to be an end to litigation

The SC itself put up that list not me. Point is they can rehear and set aside same case

openmine:
If that is the case...then they are no longer supreme!

No. They are supreme but they are also human and live in a fallible world

openmine:
As much as i want Ihedioha to become governor of imo state,the supreme court has made a stance whether right or wrong which can be corrected in subsequent matters similar to this!
Any attempt to reverse their initial stance will throw up more reviews and they will end up being deprived of their supremacy!

I’ve already shown u that u r wrong, why keep repeating same thing

openmine:
I have a question for you.....Does the constitution prevent the supreme court from changing its initial stance? YES or NO?

NO.
The Supreme Court has the power to set aside its judgement, and rehear same under the following circumstances:
1. Where there is a clerical mistake in the judgement or Order,
2. Where there is an error arising from an accidental slip or omission,
3. Where there arises the necessity for carrying out its own meaning and to make its intention plain,
4. Where any of the parties obtained judgement by fraud or deceit;
5. Where such a decision is a nullity,
6. Where it is obvious that the Court was misled into giving the decision under a wrong belief that the parties consented to it,
7. When the judgement was given without jurisdiction,
8. Where the procedure adopted was such as to deprive the decision or judgement of the character of a legitimate adjudication,
9. Where the writ or application was not served on the other party, or there is denial of fair hearing and
10. Where the decision/judgement is contrary to public policy and will perpetuate injustice.

Tuns20, globemoney, VIPERVENOM, Jimalicoco, NJPot

Tuns20:
The supreme court can overturn its own Judgment.. It happened in the USA.. Go and check the records...

Happens right here in Nigeria. See above

Jimalicoco:
Supreme court cannot reverse its judgement,even as the judgement is full of errors. However, it will be noted so as to avoid future occurrence.

U people always say this and it is not true.

Olorunfemi v Asho
This is yet another case in which the Supreme Court took the bold position to set aside its earlier decision. The Supreme Court set aside its judgment delivered in January 8, 1999 on the ground that, it failed to consider the respondents’ cross–appeal before allowing the appellant’s appeal.

Johnson v Lawanson
Coker J.S.C. delivering the court’s judgment held that “when the court is faced with the alternative of perpetuating what it is satisfied is an erroneous decision which was reached per incuriam and will, if followed, inflict hardship and injustice upon the generations in the future or of causing temporary disturbances of rights acquired under such a decision, I do not think we shall hesitate to declare the law as we find it.” The court then ordered that the appeal be re-heard de novo by another panel of Justices of the Supreme Court. Nadio2019

Openmine, Tuns20, globemoney, VIPERVENOM, NJPot

https://www.vanguardngr.com/2020/02/precedents-when-supreme-court-is-asked-to-reverse-itself/

If the SC let this embarrassment of a judgment stand, two things:
(1) U can no longer tell Nigerians that lying and cheating does not pay when they can see for themselves that the highest court in the land rewards blatant cheating and forgery.
(2) By the precedent set here, any candidate able to obtain INEC documents (usually ruling party candidates) can write any result they wish and the Supreme Court must accept those results no matter how fraudulent or defective they may be, inevitably leading to a one-party country.

Tuns20, globemoney, VIPERVENOM, Jimalicoco, NJPot, openmine, Dangrace01

Kreamie:
Kudos to the Nigerian government for keeping the mortality very low to be honest.

It’s our weather. Our inept government has nothing to do with it

sinaj:
Cov19 has been recorded in UAE since January, mainly from tourists. I guess the first case you referring to is from their citizen.

Stop being deceptive. U said Saudi Arabia.
Also only 21 cases in the whole UAE and I bet most are from Iran - and 5 have fully recovered, non dead

JJOF:
Yeah just as the way HIV is not doing well here.

All viruses are not same. Corona is much like flu which thrives in cold weather (winter, fall)

McCoy662:
and u forgot that before science invented malaria vaccine, it had killed billions of people??

But the world did not end. Also humanity had local remedies that worked

sinaj:
Saudi Arabia is hotter than Nigeria yet the disease is thriving there so I think it has something to do with our skin, maybe the melanin resist it sort of.

Not true. You mean Iran. Well the temperature in Tehran is 42F, in 9ja it’s in the 90’s.
Saudi Arabia just recorded their FIRST case - some guy that went to Iran

Judybash93:
Our weather? Then why is it thriving in the Middle East? It's damn hot there...

Not true. You mean Iran. Well the temperature in Tehran is 42F, in 9ja it’s in the 90’s