₦airaland Forum

I have always s known that removing those check points was a bad decision.

humilitypays:
I quite agree with you but do u know that it is easier for a guy born in a rich family to find a beautiful and responsible girl to date/marry than for a guy born in poverty, who later became rich

And y must a girl be ugly before she can have good character, yy

Why can't we see plenty super-pretty girls with respect, humility and good feminine character

I hate it when people make it seem like only ugly girls have good character.

My own mother judging from her looks now must have been very pretty as a young lady and she still had awesome character that my papa always praise till date.


Truth is, a rich single guy in present day Nigeria should avoid dating poor girls!

Find your equal...in your estate...find a way to meet those girls there living with their rich parents too...avoid the spoilt ones who club around town...e.g. those ones u see at THE PLACE @Lekki...those spoilt rich girls who come to club in company of their fellow spoilt rich girls searching for music stars to enchant...avoid them and avoid meeting girls at clubs and bars!

Look for introvert girls from rich family backgrounds.

Or y do u think kings forbid their sons marrying a girl that isn't a princess Its to avoid gold-digging by poor girls...sadly, that's how the world operates- let the rich marry the rich and let the poor marry fellow poor and work hard together to become rich. That mes it easier and fair to all concerned.

Meanwhile, learn to enjoy your money and forget women in general...the right girl will cross your path by destiny, and make sure u aren't living a dirty life of sleeping around with different girls while waiting for one cinderella...of course nature won't allow it to work.

I quite agree with younot entirely though.

I do not believe that a girl has to be ugly before she has a good character.neither did i say that only girls from poor homes have good character.but it is a well known fact that in every 10 rich girls,at least 4 must be bad.it is hard to see a girl(or even boy) who the family's wealth didn't influence.we can't say the same for the ones from poor and average homes.even the poor ones who are spoilt,are majorly influenced by these rich ones.

And again know this,decent girls can be found anywhere,even in the club.it just takes a decerning eyes and a little bit of patience when you follow your intuition to find out.also,it is not all girls from poor homes are gold diggers,some of them are actually looking for true love just like you, while they work hard to carve a niche for themselves financially.

My point is,when looking for a woman(whether rich,average or poor),you should know the qualities you like in a woman,you also know the things that attract you to a woman,go for what you like,if at the end of the day,she is not what you want,discharge her and continue your search, you will surely meet her.
just dicard the thought that you must marry a rich girl who suits your standard so as not to meet a gold digger.a good girl is a good girl irrespective of her status.

Spot on @op.

But it is not entirely hard to find a decent girl especially since you have had a taste of both hard and confortable life.you just need to come down from your high horse and get yourself a decent lady.from your write up,your problems are so glaring,you just need a change of approach.

Men who are far richer than you have successfully gotten themselves good women,they went about it the right way.when you go about showing them you have money,why won't they want to collect their own share? Show your broke ass hommies you got money and they will still want their share.that's the reality of life.

I quite agree that good girls are not easy to come by and that there are some amount of luck involved, but there are also some amount of hard work invloved too.there are still girls who see beyond your money depending on the personality you portray....also try to look beyond drop dead beauty,big asses and big boobs and you will find what you are look for.

blacq2009:
My point is, if they can cross a border to execute their killings, then they can equally travel to the South to do same.

I get your drift,but i don't think you are entirely correct.

they will have to bypass so many security barries to attack people down south which makes it very difficult, but not impossible, to attack the people down south.while the common boundary,common religion and culture makes it easier for them to penetrate and mix up with people of chad,Niger and other countries which share boundary in a bid to attack them.

Whether they attack north or south,their aim is being successfully achieved, which is to put fear into the citizenry and to send a strong message across the Nigeria government.chad isn't the target,attacking them was to let them know that they are not scared of the regional forces,and to coerce them into reneging on their promise to help Nigeria fight.

blacq2009:
If their target is the christians, they'll definitely go after them. If BH can travel to Chad to kill Muslims there, then Southern Nigeria is no distance at all.

BH kill both muslim and christians.the only difference is that they kill more muslims than christians simply because the north has more muslims than christians.

And i think chad shares boundary with maiduguri and is closer to it than most,if not all southern states of Nigeria.

This my childhood crush no dy fade at all

fulanimafia:
You can insult me all you want, but I will not descend to that level. What I've stated is the pure truth, you never bought the idea of change so it's puzzling how you suddenly lay claim to it.

Convince me that Buhari stopped being a president of Nigeria and has now become the president of the North and South west who bought his change mantra and gave him block votes and i will buy your sentment.

I know your are lettered,guide your words.

blacq2009:
Alongside? How many Christians have died in this BH stuff? They have killed more Muslims than they have, Christians. Don't let your hatred for Islam overshadow your reasoning. BH is sponsored by a God-knows-who to defame Islam.

BH is a thing of the NORH.and we have more muslims in the North than christians.

So what did you expect

fulanimafia:
He didn't get the mandate of all. Your yardstick should be competence not ethnicity, as for representation, I assure you the SW will be significantly represented in his cabinet. I will be heavily disappointed if he gives any tangible portfolio to those who hated him with passion and said he was too old and illiterate to govern. They have no business in such a government, and should be limited to ministers of state since the law requires every state to produce a minister.

Jonathan once said Igbos were the pillar of his administration, yet no one screamed blue murder. Hypocrites.

Mister,you must be a very big fool for making the kind of comments you make on this forum.i am not a fan of using foul languages on people but you just pushed me to the limit.i know you think you are smart and intelligent,but sorry to disappoint you,intelligent people don't say everything no matter how disgruntled they are.they control their emotion.

you want Buhari to run a government of revenge and witch hunting yet you preach change.if Gej ran a government of ethnicity,favouritism and nepotism,the onus now lies on pmb to do the correct thing as the agent of change he is bearing in mind that Nigeria is a multi ethnic state.he shouldn't follow the old established order.or was he not voted in to fix the ruin in the system?

Just look at the rubbish You wrote up there and tell me if your children will be proud of you after reading them.

Dollyak:
Oh, an example of the word irony. The sarcarsm obviously went over your small brain.

You don't need to blame him sweety.i had to read your second post to understand the irony and sarcarsm that came with your first post.plus,i know there was no way you could really mean that looking at the things you post on NL.i gave you the benefit of doubt and your second post gave me that sigh of relief.

I don almost ready ready to bash you...lol

But pmb promised change.trend like this is one of the things dividing Nigeria along ethnic and religious lines.as a messiah of change,we expect him to do something different.are there nobody he can trust from the other side of the divide? Are there no competent friend and brother from other zones? Selecting a none northerner for such sensitive post would have sent a strong message across that Buhari has come to strengthen our unity among other things.if pmb made this exact calculation the op made before making this appointment,it only shows that he doesn't believe in one Nigeria and nothing makes him positively different from his predecessors.where is the love and unity if a president cannot trust his country men except people from his region....we rather go our seperate ways instead of deceiving ourselves.

Buhari,by his latest appointment,has confirmed that ONE NIGERIA IS A FRAUD.

nwadiuko1:
you don't know Aba do you?

He obviousy dsn't

I thought some people said he wasn't going to be nominated.

I love this man

Dollyak:
Face wetin? Make sense for once in your life.

Lol

Wicked!!

Dollyak:
None of these politicians are for the masses. We need a revolution in Nigeria.

Off topic

I like u

So Fani dey chop punachi?

Good conduct!

Rawani:
If it's possible to recover the loot of past leaders then that's brilliant. It's just not realistic compared to Jonathan's loot which is readily traceable with the quasi-audit reports among others.

It is very much possible to return the loot of past leaders if the key stone(the president) stands determined and incorruptible.

In the interest of peace and fairness,the past leaders should be probed along side GEJ to pass a message to future leaders that nobody is untouchable. and that Justice delayed isn't justice denied.

Rawani:
Unfortunately we do not have the luxury of choice. I'm glad you admitted Jonathan's failures and you agree he should be probed and punished where found wanting, wouldn't it be greater hypocrisy to chant change and do things EXACTLY like we used to because we don't want to look vindictive? I get your point but it's outweighed by the present realities. A precedence has to be set, and Jonathan is the one being succeeded, not OBJ, Murtala Mohammed or Lord Lugard.

Lol.....the mention of Lugard got me laughing.

But on a serious note, you want to tell that our past leaders are free to enjoy their ill gotten wealth because of Goodluck's inability to probe them? Are you aware of how much Nigeria will make if they are made to bring back stolen money?

What's your point bro? i don't quite get you.

Rawani:
Jonathan should be probed and punished, nothing will happen, the heavens will not fall. How can we be serious about turning around our travails as a country if we still cannot be objective enough to do what is right without sentiments. The argument that he should be left alone as past leaders were not probed, lacks all validity because;

1. No one restrained him from doing so, his failure to do so effectively underlines his incompetence;

2. Show me a past Nigerian leader that left the coffers empty AND plunged us in a N13 Trillion debt.

I will answer your two questions at once.

I agree that Jonathan has been the worst president Nigeria has ever produced and his incompetence plunged us into a huge debt.I also agree that he needs to be probed asap because his ineptitude is so glaring.

but you can also agree with me that we voted Buhari in because of change.we want something positively different from what Jonathan gave us.if Jonathan failed to probe the past leaders because of his cluelessness,i wouldn't want Buhari to be as clueless as not to probe them as the agent of change he is.Buhari was voted in to show Jonathan what true leadership is.to fight corruption to a stand still,all our leaders,both past and present,must be made to také responsibility for their actions and inactions.singling Jonathan out doesn't solve it because,our past leaders are still the same people in the corridors of power.

It will amount to sheer hypocrisy if Buhari fails to probe our past leaders but goes ahead to probe Jonathan alone.

Vivly:
Some people can attain the highest celebrity status but would still retain the Mgbeke in them.
You can take the chic to Oxford but you can't take the Owerri out of the girl.

Sweety upload your pix pls!

I wan follow see ur pix abeg bcuz i wan knw hw babe wey no be mgbeke be like.

adeekiti:
The ones wey she don do never satisfy am, she sef be another , at her age she should av forget sex

Just hear yourself


What an immature contribution

ERODEDEAST:
Ayeeeee Jaja Jawara

Taa!!! Obote

No be the same person

Jaja of opobo.


The first black man to handle a gun.

Lala247:
Nice one Op

Babez, your shape dey dia wickedly

Me likey.

Orji Uzor shut up your dirty mouth.

You are now politically irrelevant in Nigeria, so lies wouldn't do you any good.

mcquin:
It's a long walk to success in any country. We don't have to maintain status quo because of such fears or do we?

At least let's start it first before condemning it already or tell me what is wrong with same?

You missed the point.

What i'm saying is that,the president,not choosing the inec chairman, isn't supposed to be one of the very first approaches to consider to curb corruption in Nigeria.it can always come later when things have been put in place.

The system should,first and fore most, be sanitized completely.the people and the leaders should first of all be made to have a corrupt free mindset.let us record some level of success in the fight against corruption first before changing the status quo.the government shouldn't do things that would bring more questions than answers.of course,the inec might be given enough power to select her chairman, but at the end of the day,the president still influences the selection indirectly.let the people see some positives first,and that can come later.

such rapid change, would be seen as the government,trying to pull wool over the people's eyes.especially,if he goes on to win a subsequent election.

mcquin:
That Uwais report is indeed key to our electoral reforms. President's should no longer appoint the head of INEC.

I see people that mean business.

Story!!!

If corruption is not purged out of the system and out of the mind of the people completely,the president must still have a say in who becomes the Inec chairman,whether directly or indirectly.

Beremx:
shut up you hungry monetary protection seeker. I find it disgusting that you even responded to me.

PDP has admitted their failures in all ramifications and you're talking about exclusive admittance. Nonsense!!

If you say in all ramification,that means you didn't understand those tweets completely.

In those tweets,they still mentioned some feats they achieved, and finally said they také responsiblity for everything.doesn't that tell you something? They still think they got some things right.invariably,they believe the rot in the system didn't start with them,but way back the time Barcanista quoted or even further back.

Pdp have been totally abysmal in their approach to leadership and are hugely part of everything wrong in Nigeria.but i'd want you to give Barcanista some credit,he is not entirely wrong.

Waje my personal pesin....

But both dis pix and the wear no fine joor!

Busted!!!!!!

onatisi:
What started like a childs play in the 90s is now a full grown monster. Cult groups who normally hide their identities and only meet at night under the cover of darkness are now openly showing and displaying their identities, this will only encourage more youths to join, I won't be surprised if the governor of edo is a cult member himself.

It started way back before the 90s