₦airaland Forum

Maynman:
Weak.
Encanker locomotive slave, that barren mentality of yours will be exposed.

Wow so this is what I have been practicing? I am so lucky to meet you prof. You have opened my eyes.

What a line

LordReed:
Oh it's pretty loud and clear that you are a master of stereotyping,

Sure...I was spot on with it.

Dude I am done with you, conversation with you will degenerate into you getting frustrated and throwing around insults so I am not interested.

We are not conversing here...it was a challenge thrown at you in form of a book. I accept your submission to withdraw.

At least you will think twice next time barging into threads with very uninformed
and derogatory rhetorics on topics you know very little about.

Maynman:
Do better, think na.
Encanker locomotive slave, that barren mentality of yours will be exposed

Lol, by quoting lines, AUM, and Locomotive?

Please Go ahead...waiting.

Maynman:
Quote a AUM 😂

I do that like all the time: AUM

Lol I am your nemesis, you'll learn

Neme gini?

How?

Via locomotion, AUM or via "quote a line 😅"?

Maynman:
Encanker locomotive slave, oya AUM

I will quote a line o

Lmao. You're quite entertaining

Maynman:
You are empty that's why you getting angry easily.

Since you have read the paper, quote a line that supports your jargons on here, how hard

Prof, prof

E say na "quote a line"

Legend of the Quotes

LordReed:
Why the stereotyping you doing is not enough?

What you quoted is actually a tongue-in-cheek statement. Understand it all over again...

LoLz. Like I need your permission to be in this section.

Having given you what trolls here can never wrap their heads around, much is expected of you moving forward given your earlier allusion to being different. Any thing else and we're back to the paragraph above.

LordReed:
You are jest projecting your quick judgement and stereotyping of people on to me very clearly.

Oh! I am just seeing this.

I think from the insults and trolling of people's opinion on this thread by your friends, we will need to define the word "stereotype".

I think I am done with this. Have a good day.

So I want to believe we won't be seeing you anytime soon in the religion-bashing section given the work of science you've been furnished with explaining the physics and mathematics of what religion is into and aspires to?

I suppose not!!!

Lol

Maynman:
Weak, enckanker locomotive slave, you just need to soul travel and shout AUM like your slave master taught you, lwkmd 😂

AUM.

Maynman:
Enckanker locomotive slave, your slave masters are not doing their job, why do you need professor.
Just soul travel

Because after oga prof, na prof lmao.

You are the only one that can prof the locomotive

Maynman:
Enckanker locomotive slave, oya soul travel to the most high God, hypsistos

I rather want to go to Nairaland to see the locomotive professor of physics

Maynman:
Locomotive enckanker slave, illiterate when last did you soul travel 😂
Do you even know what "soul" means, that it will travel
Or is it astral projection 😅, madame blavaskty has gotten a hold of your mind.

No na, it's sister Ngozi

Maynman:
Dummy, your enkanker slave master you are following, hope you know how he derived his doctrines

I do, he derived it from locomotive assumption

Maynman:
That project will be a waste, I assure you.
You started the project with a fixed assumption that's why you will fail!

Honestly man...

So daft

"Fixed assumption" and I warned him to always use locomotive assumption but he refused

A001:
Thank you. I'm not even bothered by those ones. None of those people can solve a simple problem in Physics. Give them a simple wave function of a quantum mechanical system to solve and analyze and watch them become mute.

They're dull people. The physics underlying consciousness is even more fundamental and more mind-bending than Quantum Physics.

Though I've done and published a thesis of over 120 pages on this new physics and the mathematics underlying consciousness and a range of other natural phenomena, my work isn't meant for discussion on a forum like Nairaland at this stage.

This isn't a scientific community. Research in science follows a specific protocol, and peer review is highly important. This is the stage of my papers now on the subject.

The project took 5 years to complete up to the current level and is still ongoing. That's why I can't say much on the subject here.

I believe an objective (scientific) understanding of consciousness will be achieved in the coming years. A new field of Physics with its own mathematical frameworks is required for this.

You're welcome. I will lay hands on your work when available I believe. Cheers and Godspeed!

A001:
Nature is actually far, far complex than what you, or anyone, can imagine. If you take a leaf and put a small hole on it, then look through that hole.

What you see is what physicists mainly perceive as all that exists: A tiny segment of reality. Our eyes and instruments can only detect a tiny segment of the vast ranges of segments of the EM spectrum.

There are tons of realms we don't even know, but they exist right around us.

There are waves that exist beyond (below) the radio wave segment of the EM spectrum that most humans aren't even aware of. These are waves of extremely low frequencies (ELFs), too tiny for the human eye or our instruments to see/detect.

What I'm talking about here is a whole new realm entirely. It's these waves religious people call the soul, spirit and the likes.

It's real, and I've actually developed the physics and mathematics, though I don't use either soul or spirit to refer to these waves.

This is a new field of physics entirely with tons of potential applications, including the design of living systems such as humans.

I am really really sorry about the actions of trolls in this thread. I am really sorry.

I believe your ongoing work will peel off a later off the scales in people's eyes on the subject of Consciousness and other side of nature. All the best!

KnownUnknown:
Absolutely, and I’m not sorry. Boy, you’re simply too stupid for me to respect.

Lol. When did I mention i needed respect from a Nairaland troll?

KnownUnknown:
Lol, stupid bastard. You ill educated jackasses around here talking about “lack of understanding” are hilarious. A pretend “physicist” and another clown presenting unsubstantiated nonsense as proof of magic.

What do you know and what do you have to offer then? We don't know anything on physics and whatnot, what do you know about the physics of Consciousness, Manifestation, Nature?

My best guess is: you only have a skull-load of trolling, jesting and insults. That's my assumption I'm sorry.

LordReed:
I have been interacting with A001 for years so don't use that excuse. If you are unable to leave your own stereotyping behind, with what mouth are you using to accuse others of being unwilling to learn? Are you not fully demonstrating you are the one unwilling to learn?

How is asking you if you've tried the techniques jesting, trolling and getting worked up? You are the one getting worked up because I asked you a question to show I'm willing to engage. I even included a detail to show you I was even reading the damn book but you are throwing it in my face for what reason?

Oh stereotyping is actually Profiling and in my case, it was an informed grouping.

You came into the thread and made a comment and the rest of the group followed jesting and trolling.

Asking me if I tried the techniques is simply your characteristic way of hoping to discredit the author's work. This is buttressed by the statement "how do you know you're not being hoodwinked" or so. Of all things your mind could go to, it went to the idea of "hoodwinking" right before going back into the book...prognosis alert!

I learnt fast and caught that antic real quick!

You showed you're unwilling to learn right from all that digging of supposed scandals of Mormons even when I made it clear I was neither promoting Mormonism neither was I discrediting them.

These seemingly small details are what I read so well my friend, so you rightly belong in the troll group. Look at the insults your friends here hurl at A 001...

KnownUnknown:
Lol, stupid bastard.

Lol

LordReed:
You are too quick to impugn someone. Run away how? You've read the book, how is asking if you've practiced the techniques now running away? I am trying to engage you and you are acting like a flower wilting under the glare of the sun. You don't seem ready to have your assertions scrutinized with this your behaviour. If you aren't ready to engage meaningfully then say it, your passive aggressiveness is getting irritating.

Take a cue from A001, when I asked him a question, he didn't reply with condescension he gave a succinct answer.

I didn't ask about the authenticity of the author's work I asked: how do you tell difference between who is trying to hoodwink you from a genuine person? What criteria do you use? What is so difficult in answering these questions?

Do not blame me at all. I am responding to you based on what I knew you and the your group. A001 is just being introduced to your group and I'm sure he'll know better.

On asking me: Most times, the problem we face in dealing with people on subject as this even when they encroach on our threads by trolling (e.g you introductory message on this thread), is the problem of establishing information parallels given a neophyte or an absolute ignoramus (no insult intended here).

So for us to tango, you must do some findings, then our interaction will be tilted towards a debate or Qs and As rather than jesting, trolling and getting worked up when the favor is returned.

So go ahead and read, the idea is not for you to understand entirely, its for you to come from the position of knowledge rather than scandal-mining or trolling.

LordReed:
Have you practiced the techniques in this book? Have you used the algorithmic sequence to produce a desired object in the world on demand?

Also as an aside how do you tell difference between who is trying to hoodwink you from a genuine person? What criteria do you use?

I knew you will run away

This 'Naysay' condition comes from the high propensity to rather troll than learn.

You don't ask someone for a taste of a pudding, you taste it.

On the authenticity of the author's work, he could have quote the Bible with "As a man thinketh, so is he", and he would have taught you how to manifest anything from the ethers via thought and some little sunshine within you (which people like you will doubt exists anyways).

Don't ask me questions. Read up and we'll talk.

LordReed:
Oh good that would save me the trouble. Give a link to download.

There you go

Something from No Thing:
https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:EU:55693b26-ca36-4a80-b73e-f20fb8474dc

I will recommend you prime up with this which is a Short for the above: https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:EU:38a7c1a5-1ba4-47ef-b668-55457bcc70e

LordReed:
You realise this is not a published physics paper right?

We'll see...

LordReed:
Oh don't worry I have my ways but I'd rather not get into it, I prefer civil discussion without any of that baggage.

Lets keep this behind us and focus on civil side of things then. I can help with the book for free if FX is an issue.

I really want to see the looks in your face when we're done with the book. At least you and company will see how science had merged with religion, with God.

LordReed:
Link the published paper.

I have not impugned your person so this descent into insult just take note that it is you who started it so when I give it to you don't start crying.

Okay sorry about that and I apologize...although it was 90% prognosis and 10% yab...
The person behind this keyboard doesn't cry. You don't have what it takes please...

On the work of physics: You will search for the book "Something from No Thing by AR Bordon Lulu.com"

Please prove me wrong (about understanding) and open a thread for us to see what you read. I need to eliminate that stereotype (of lack of understanding) I have on you, Maynman, knownunknown, and others.

LordReed:
How does this CIA document make Joseph Smith not a fraud and the Book of Mormon not a product of fraud?

I initially summarized your line of reasoning earlier where I pointed out your rather simplistic and unclever antics of digging up so-called scandals as justification for any reasonable work done by people.


Google "Albert Einstein Fraud", then go ahead to convince us Einstein isn't a real scientist. More grist for your mill at least.

LordReed:
I can't wait for when science shows us how water turns into wine just by saying or wishing it. LoLz.

Oh the science actually exists. It's an elaborate work by a physicist who not only explains why it works but how. As in: He explained the physics of not just turning water to wine, but raising the dead!

I am sure your troll and highly I-dont-know skull never thought this was possible and existent.

This is what we've been saying all along, you lack information and knowledge yet make too much noise and intimidate people who are miles ahead...


Let's say I oblige to point you to the research work, do you have the head to understand it? I don't think so! Why do I think so?

The e-rat life you and your colleagues here lead is symptomatic of an emptiness--a lack of intelligence. You troll to fill up this space which only proper education can take care of.

A001:
I don't like to get involved in arguments about God. God is a highly subjective word. What I'm after as a scientist is objectivity.

The gist of that link isn't about God...

A001, the issue with LordReed and company is that they mostly are not even abreast with science beyond the archaic text books talk more of latest development in science judging from his statement that science and religion (God) don't meet.

This was how I referred one of them to CIA's (now obsolete) finding on how Consciousness can be used to create Miracles. The person i referred simply dismissed it as the CIA being a paid actor.

Here is the link to the resource and others:

https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/search/site/The%20gateway%20process

Note that CIA's findings on the subject is yet at the kindergarten stage comparably to what mystics have discovered and used for over 10,000 years back.

tctrills:
With science, there is hardly a conclusion. We keep learning everyday.
So just because a religious event does not rhyme with the accepted science of today does not mean it can't be found to be absolutely correct in 10 years time still using scientific Indicators.
That's where faith comes in.

And likewise spirituality. Infact Spirituality declared a 'always-One-step-ahead' phenomena to truth. It states there is always another level. Infinity!