₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,325,298 members, 8,421,221 topics. Date: Saturday, 06 June 2026 at 02:20 AM

Toggle theme

Chris365's Posts

Nairaland ForumChris365's ProfileChris365's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 (of 54 pages)

Foreign AffairsRe: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by chris365(m): 12:33am On Sep 21, 2013
CraigB: Fits perfectly into everything you've posted in the last two hours. You've been reduced to:

1. Pink cards; and

2. Angry "throw outs".

Sucks being you.
i only respond to your posts since you're too stup1d to be objective with your comments. So far you're the one doing the throw out.
what's wrong with your ignore button again?

Something i said must have given you a knock on your brain to have spoilt your ignore button

knowledge always sucks to a stup1d person, so to you it will definitely suck being me.

keep it coming stupido
Foreign AffairsRe: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by chris365(m): 12:16am On Sep 21, 2013
CraigB: Quite right.

As can be observed from your posts

Good to see that being ignored has caused you to reflect on your behavior.

*Ignore button back on and the weekend begins.
my posts likehuhhuhhuh O i 4got your comments is always made from stupi1dity

extremely weak and senseless response.

Your ignore button seems to be broken Cos i expected you to STFU and live up to your words. Unless you don't know what it means.

Now press on it very hard cos i would not appreciate another weak and senseless response from you again. Dummy
Foreign AffairsRe: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by chris365(m):
I've always had my reasons for calling you stup1d and you've never disappointed in proving me right.

chris365: i bet you would have written a whole page if i had made a grammatical blunder.
CraigB: 1, 2, 3 grammatical errors. No need to comment... Sense doesn't dwell here anyway.
and you didn't disappoint by making the post long as expected. well, let me give you an advise that might change your life

[size=14pt]The 5 Stupidest Ways People Try to Look Smart[/size]

#3. [size=13pt]Correct Others' Trivial Mistakes[/size]

Stup1d people love to show off their smarts by making corrections. It could be following up on your slip of the tongue, or disproving an old wives' tale, or playing semantics, but if it's a piece of minutia they've acquired by being awake in class for five seconds or maybe reading Cracked, then they'll be sure to seize the opportunity to make that correction. They say things like this:

Hey, man, technically, it's Frankenstein's MONSTER, not Frankenstein;

And that might be true, but, on behalf of the rest of us, please stop speaking. Are you actually trying to teach us something? Do you really have a plethora of useful factoids filling your cranium from a lifetime of study? Or did you just jump on the one chance you'll have for weeks to impress us with wisdom small enough to be written on the palm of your hand in the cheat sheet of your life?
Foreign AffairsRe: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by chris365(m):
zetdee: Former Nigerian aviation minister - Nigeria to break or not to break.

By Femi Fani-Kayode

*Fani Kayode was a Minister of Aviation
lemme give you an advise.. before you come here to quote some idiotic Nigerian politicians, try to find out how their views are accepted first.

if i quote from a racist Boer, you'll call it wrong. but it's not for you to quote an ethnic bigot to justify your idiotic obsession of Nigeria's problem.

a former minister who's political future is already dead as a result of his incompetence and makes careless and immature statements just to stay relevant.

i told you to get a life didn't i?
Foreign AffairsRe: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by chris365(m): 10:10pm On Sep 20, 2013
CraigB: *Looks around. Finds nothing worth his while. Gets back to work.
i think i know why..

Foreign AffairsRe: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by chris365(m): 9:56pm On Sep 20, 2013
Fighter Pilot: No chief your intelligence is already compromised, t[b]he insugents intelligence has an upper hands over your army[/b]. It is only a fool who would ever rate such an intelligent system to be the best in Africa.
hahahahahahahaha... so we can as well say seleka and poachers have better intelligence capabilities than your army too grin
Foreign AffairsRe: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by chris365(m): 9:53pm On Sep 20, 2013
CraigB: And given that you don't have the equipment that you need, what makes you believe you'll have what you need in an all-out war?
so based on your understanding (still stup1d), you use conventional weapons to fight terrorists who hide among innocent people? do you use warships, Tanks, artillery guns, missiles etc to fight terrorism? that was a very weak and lazy statement.

read your post again and ask yourself WTF you meant. dummy

Foreign AffairsRe: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by chris365(m): 9:44pm On Sep 20, 2013
CraigB: The moment you put on an "intelligence cap", you'll get all the answers you need. if i can ever give it

Foreign AffairsRe: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by chris365(m): 9:22pm On Sep 20, 2013
Henry120: you had to employ the services of former navy seals to help you out with your poaching problem. That doesn't say to me that you have a hold on the situation.

Listen, terrorists are members of the populace. He can pass a military check-point 100 times and not a single officer would know what his sinister motives are. He only needs to pick his AK-47 and like I had earlier said, throw the nation in mourning. It's like fighting ghosts.
guy you're wasting your time with the dimwit. common sense is not his forte
Foreign AffairsRe: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by chris365(m): 8:40pm On Sep 20, 2013
CraigB: Can you see how I will ignore the rest of your post? Now that's how you deal with a rant.
CraigB: It's your rants that are being ignored - Not you
like i said you don't know what it means to ignore a post. now watch as i show you how to press on to the ignore button.

and about a reasonable response to my question..........

Foreign AffairsRe: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by chris365(m): 8:22pm On Sep 20, 2013
CraigB: If it was ranting, you would have ignored it.

I know better.

Can you see how I will ignore the rest of your post? Now that's how you deal with a rant.
exactly what i expected. too complicated for your weak brain. i bet you would have written a whole page if i had made a grammatical blunder.
you're a complete nincompoop

i think it proper to expose your ignorance and fool1shness to those who follow this thread whenever you try to feel smart (which you've continue to fail).

trust me, if you had the sense to know what it means to ignore someone, you wouldn't have responded to the post in the first place.
Foreign AffairsRe: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by chris365(m): 8:09pm On Sep 20, 2013
CraigB: There are two sides to every story. Some would say three, even. Extremism doesn't arise out of a vacuum. It's not as if the North isn't neglected. It's not as if it's not one of the poorest and least educated regions in the whole wide world. Whose fault is that? The Naai-gerian nation brought Boko Haram upon itself because it lacks foresight.
your comment reeks of ignorance and careless ranting. i wish your brain was brighter than your skin undecided

islamic fundamentalism/extremism has been in the north before the civil war. it didn't just start yesterday.

Nigeria has the highest Muslim population in Africa focused in the North which leaves every possibility of extremist influence on gullible muslims as it is all over the world.

if your reasons are why there's boko haram, then why are there terrorist activities in US, France, and other developing countries? why would british and american citizens leave their comfort and join terrorists living in Afghanistan mountains, Yemen and somalia?

surely you should have an answer to these question other than your senseless rants.
Foreign AffairsRe: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by chris365(m): 7:54pm On Sep 20, 2013
Henry120: Your SAPS are not good enough. Terrorism would consume them. Indonesia has an economy 4.5 times larger than RSA and a military 20 times better, yet they had to seek help from the americans to deal with the problem. If nigeria cannot defeat terrorism, then no nation in africa can.
even the white pig's apartheid south african regime had to unwillingly hand over the country to what they referred as terrorists after years of unsuccessful war against them, to the extent of invading other countries that harbored them. Now he feels his country is strong enough to fight a group 10 times deadlier than ANC was.

dull kid that just spits without reasoning undecided
Foreign AffairsRe: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by chris365(m): 7:29am On Sep 20, 2013
Fighter Pilot: Even your most trusted beegle has confirmed that was Shekau's video. The one before it was an imposter and the last month one was a real one.
now i see that guarding an officer's gate under the scotching sun is affecting your head.

You want to lie about beegeagle ehn? Fail

post the before video and the latest one where he dared america. And leave the disgracing to me... I dare you
Foreign AffairsRe: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by chris365(m): 7:14am On Sep 20, 2013
Fighter Pilot: SHEKAU is raised back from the dead. Lol!! grin

Last month he came back alive in his video and dared America as he already dismissed Nigerian Army as small boys.

http://thenationonlineng.net/new/boko-haram-leader-shekau-dares-obama-in-video/
only a complete blockhead like you will not realize that the person in that video is an impostor. Complete blockhead
Foreign AffairsRe: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by chris365(m): 9:09am On Sep 19, 2013
agaugust: seleka kill ratio 160:1 is a big lie...or else Guinness book of records would have recognized it

america has only 2% muslim, nigeria has about 45% muslims....and northern nigeria where boko haram operates is 95% muslim.

america does not have a muslim population of 95% in any state to create an islamic terrorist zone.

please use the right side of your brain if the left side is not functioning cheesy

.
his brain is in the wrong position. That's why he can't think well
Foreign AffairsRe: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by chris365(m): 10:26pm On Sep 18, 2013
Thiza: @augustus Haraaaaaaaaaa is this your military capabilities Nigerian navy has 19 admirals and 34 commodores, but can only put to sea nine main vessels. The air force remains with just a handful of operational aircraft, after 15 years of heavy budgetary allocations to the armed forces under military rule.
you are a confirm okobo. a big time dummy. am not angry for your post. but that you would use a 10+ years article to judge the present. do you have a brain at all? wow.. this copy and paste brain must be a common disease to south africans.. SMH
Foreign AffairsRe: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by chris365(m): 9:52am On Sep 18, 2013
Thiza: WHERE IS INDIGENOUS NIGERIAN MIND INTO THESE STORIES? ITS TRUE THAT DESPERATE SITUATION OF LIES NEEDS DESPERATE MEASURES TO TRY TO BE SEEN AS A GIANT....AGAIN INTIL NIGERA CONSTRUCT ITS OWN ELECTRICITY SUB STATION AND PRODUCE ELECTRICITY WITHOUT ANY OUTSISDE ASSISTANCE....TO SOUTH AFRICANS NIGERIA WOULD REMAIM A DWARF THAT BELIEVE ITS A GIANT
i now see why you'd rather copy and paste than to comment from your own thought. whenever you try to think on your own you end up sounding like a premature f00l.

Pakistan has electricity problems worst than Nigeria yet developed ballistic missiles and has nukes. you are a f00l if you think you need to have steady power supply to build missiles. you better resume your copy and paste.

f00l that doesn't even look at what he copies from. your news is 2004 and Nigeria backed out from it long ago before we decided to train engineers for such project. our missile project is new and growing very fast.
Foreign AffairsRe: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by chris365(m): 8:55am On Sep 18, 2013
agaugust:

[size=16pt] all south african DENEL and ASMCOR weapons manufacturing technologies were imported, directly transferred and copied from Europe, America, and Israel for a long period of time from 1960s till 2013.....FACT !!!![/size]
[/b]


nigeria is building its missile alone, fact !!! the south african RSA-3 ballistic missile was built by Israel, a copy of Israel's Jericho missile, fact !!!


http://www.nti.org/country-profiles/south-africa/delivery-systems/


Last updated: February, 2013

"South Africa has decades of experience developing missile and rocket technology, but it dismantled its covert ballistic missile program after announcing the end of its secret nuclear weapons program in the early 1990s. Since the mid-1960s, South Africa has developed short-range tactical missiles;

in the 1970s and 1980s, South Africa, with help from Israel, began developing a longer range ballistic missile as a possible delivery vehicle for nuclear warheads. A July 1989 test launch of what South Africa called a "booster rocket" confirmed Pretoria had a ballistic missile program similar to Israel's Jericho missile series
,

and precipitated intense scrutiny from the United Nations and the United States. South Africa had dismantled its nuclear weapons program by the early 1990s, and subsequently halted its long-range missile program. It is now a member of the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR), and the Hague Code of Conduct against Ballistic Missile Proliferation (HCOC).[2]

Capabilities

Design Characteristics Tables

Ballistic Missiles and Rockets
South Africa developed the Republic of South Africa (RSA) missile series, based largely on Israeli missiles. Armscor, the principal developer of Pretoria's nuclear weapons system, designed gun-type nuclear devices that could be delivered by aircraft, but it had plans to upgrade the weapons for possible delivery by RSA missiles.

Pretoria developed four missiles whose design characteristics are shown in Table 1. The RSA-1 was an intermediate-range, single-stage ballistic missile with a 1,100km trajectory coupled with a standard warhead mass of 1,500kg. The RSA-2 followed, with a range of 1,900km and the ability to carry a 1,500kg standard warhead mass.The RSA-3, based on the Israeli Jericho missile/Shavit launch vehicle, was a three-stage solid-fueled orbital launch vehicle. While Pretoria wanted to develop a long-range ballistic missile for warhead delivery, it did not have the technology at the time to produce a lightweight warhead for missile delivery.The RSA-3's first stage had control or steering vanes in the exhaust and at the base of the vehicle. A guidance/ orientation/spin-up bus for the third stage and payload, totaling a mass of 583kg, topped the second stage. After second stage burnout, the spin-stabilized third stage placed the payload into orbit.To support its missile development program, South Africa developed an indigenous solid-propellant production capability. The RSA-4 was still in development when Pretoria announced the dismantlement of its nuclear weapons program and subsequently its space program.

History

1960s to Early 1980s: South Africa Increases Missile Range with Israeli Aid


The Armaments Corporation of South Africa (Armscor) began developing rockets and missiles in the mid-1960s, focusing primarily on short-range tactical missiles for battlefield use. By the early 1980s, Armscor produced only two missiles used by the South African Defence Forces (SADF): the 22km range Valkiri surface-to-surface artillery missile, and the 4-10km range V3 Kukri air-to-air missile.[8] However, in tandem with South Africa's secret nuclear weapons program begun in the mid-1970s, Pretoria began an effort to acquire or build a long-range missile. At that time, South Africa had little if any experience with relevant technologies such as high-thrust engines, propellant production, and inertial guidance systems.[9] Thus, Pretoria turned to Israel, an important military supplier since the 1950s, and one of the few countries to provide military technology to South Africa after the United Nations imposed embargoes on the country for its apartheid system in 1963 and 1977.

A March 1975 memo addressed to the SADF Commandant-General from the Chief of Staff indicates that Israel had offered to sell Pretoria 500km range Jericho-1 missiles, and that Pretoria was interested in acquiring the nuclear warheads to arm these missiles. Rather than buy off-the-shelf Israeli missiles, Pretoria apparently decided to use Israeli designs and technical assistance.

In 1978, Armscor formed Kentron (now Denel Dynamics), a new subsidiary with a staff of 1,600 headquartered in Pretoria, that was responsible for guided missile development and manufacture. Kentron produced the shorter range RSA-1 and RSA-2 missiles, and also, with Israeli help, undertook development of intermediate and long-range ballistic missiles.

Israeli technological assistance included the design schematics and the capability of constructing the ten-ton solid propellant rocket motors that powered the Jericho-2 missile. These motors formed the basis of two space launchers for the R5b space program. The overall design and capability suggest that the RSA-2 was either a licensed copy of, or modeled closely after, Israel's Jericho-2 missile. Moreover, the first and second stages of the RSA-3 used the same rocket motor as Israel's Shavit launch vehicle, and the third stage, also like the Shavit, had a five metric ton thrust spherical motor.


While Pretoria claimed that it was funding a space program, it sought to eventually use the rockets as weapons delivery systems. According to one history of South African-Israeli military cooperation: "In 1987 Armscor informed the South African Cabinet it could build a missile, based on Israeli design, which 'could hit a target in Nairobi within 300 yards,' about 2,500 km from South Africa."

1989: Rocket Test Reveals Nuclear Ambitions and Draws International Scrutiny
Despite UN embargoes, South Africa secretly collaborated with Israel on a ballistic missile program under the guise of a civilian space program, referred to as R5b. In June 1989, the Washington Times reported that, South Africa, with assistance to Israel, planned to test-launch a new intermediate-range missile. Later, an Armscor spokesman confirmed that the company had over the past six years built a missile test range at Overberg on the southern tip of South Africa. Around the same time, U.S. intelligence sources reported that South Africa was close to launching a modified version of Israel's intermediate-range Jericho-2, probably from a facility near Cape Town reportedly almost identical to Israel's launch site in the Negev Dessert. South African officials stated that the new missile had been under development since at least 1987, and would also be used as a booster for launching photo-reconnaissance satellites.

A U.S. Central Intelligence Agency assessment reportedly suggested that South Africa was also preparing to test the more advanced Israeli Shavit space launch vehicle, which might be converted to a 3,200km-range missile.


On 5 July 1989, Armscor announced that it had successfully tested a booster rocket from the Overberg test range. Outside analysts, however, suggested that the test was of an intermediate-range missile, and U.S. intelligence officials thought that a short-range missile with a rocket plume strikingly similar to Israel's Jericho-2 missile had been tested. The test missile flew 1,450 km southeast toward Prince Edward Island.[17]

After U.S. officials publicly stated in October 1989 that Israel was assisting South Africa in developing a medium-range missile, senior Israeli officials again tried to sidestep the matter, but later Israeli sources confirmed cooperation with South Africa on a variety of projects, including the joint development of a surface-to-surface missile armed with a nuclear warhead.

1990 to 2002: South Africa Terminates Ballistic Missile and Space Programs
The July 1989 rocket test intensified international concerns that South Africa, with Israeli collaboration, planned to develop nuclear tipped missiles. On 15 December 1989, the UN General Assembly adopted Resolution 44/113 B, noting its great concern about this cooperation and requesting that the Secretary-General investigate. The resulting 1991 UN report concluded in part:

The South African missile programme relies on foreign technology from various foreign sources.

The only source of officially licensed foreign missile technology today is Israel. Much additional technology is acquired clandestinely and illegally....If South Africa deploys long-range missiles, these are most likely intended to carry nuclear warheads."


http://www.nti.org/country-profiles/south-africa/delivery-systems/


.
no wonder they are jealous that Nigeria is building it's missiles alone. grin
Foreign AffairsRe: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by chris365(m): 8:43am On Sep 18, 2013
zetdee: Boko-haram is coming, 40 soldiers dead, 65 missing damn!! useless NA.
1diot, you should have posted your source if it's not premiumtimes.
PoliticsRe: 40 Soldiers Killed, 65 Missing In Boko-Haram Ambush by chris365(m): 12:29am On Sep 18, 2013
I can't believe Nigerians are this gullible and stup1d. Who in this world would believe this kitchen story if not a dummy?

1) the army can't lose 40 men and the news will not make it to the public.

1) y'all 4got the premiumtimes have a reputation of complete falsehood and you swallowed this story of unknown soldiers dished at y'all like a bunch of illiterates

the story doesn't sound right at all. And until it surfaces on another media, i'm not buying this piece of crap from premiumtimes
Foreign AffairsRe: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by chris365(m): 11:32pm On Sep 17, 2013
zaandrew: did you watch the vedioe at all
yes i saw it and called it propaganda cos both sides claimed victory. so why should i believe a south african story?

i chose to believe a neutral source which proves you lost and withdrew from your offensive on cuito. a fact i didn't make up.
Foreign AffairsRe: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by chris365(m): 10:08pm On Sep 17, 2013
zaandrew: It was never the goal of SA to capture the town but to stop the cuban-FAPLA advance, this was achieved and with the enemy suffering heavy losses. SA was all so able to close the airbase there down and force the enemy to keep a sizeable force there

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RefL01AipAU
mr man i didn't ask you to post SA propaganda. official reports confirmed that SADF advanced on cuito and planned to take the town but were made to retreat after the cubans stepped in. why do you think i keep saying you lost that war. your troops had almost retreated from the whole angolan region before the war ended. read the source i posted.

The Battle of Cuito Cuanavale in 1987/88 was an important episode in the Angolan Civil War
which SADF lost with their G6 wagon grin grin grin grin grin

in pursuit of the retreating FAPLA units the SADF and UNITA started the siege of Cuito Cuanavale on 14 October with long-range shelling by 155 mm artillery from a distance of 30 to 40 km.
As of 21 December the SADF planned the final assault "pick off" the FAPLA units which were still caught to the east of the Cuito river "before moving in to occupy the town if the conditions were favourable".
The SADF brought up reinforcements[42] and then carried out, beginning 13 January until 23 March,[citation needed] the first of what would prove to be six major ground assaults on the entrenched FAPLA positions east of the river, none of which delivered tangible results
In a third assault on 19 February the SADF suffered a first major setback when it was repelled by FAPLA battalion north of the Dala river; unable to reach FAPLA's forward positions the SADF had to withdraw.
In the following days the Cubans stepped up their air attacks against South African positions. On 25 February the FAPLA-Cubans repelled a fourth assault and the SADF had to return to its positions east of the Tumpo River. The failure of this attack "proved a turning point of the battle of Cuito Cuanavale, boosting FAPLA's flagging morale and bringing the South African advance to a standstill
After the failed assault on 23 March 1988 under orders from Pretoria the SADF withdrew the bulk of their forces, initially leaving a 1,500-man "holding force" behind (Combat Group 20) to continue deception operations and lay mines in order to prevent or slow any FAPLA offensive operations
As SADF-Colonel Jan Breytenbach wrote, the South African assault "was brought to a grinding and definite halt" by the combined Cuban and Angolan forces
so which battle or war did you win exactly huh huh huh
Foreign AffairsRe: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by chris365(m): 8:46pm On Sep 17, 2013
saengine: It will take Nigeria 50 years to develop anything that comes close to such systems. So please don't insult engineers from other countries by posting their videos on this topic.

You don't have the ability to develop strategic cruise missiles. Very simple fact. And please don't tell us about 120km....a number given by illiterate farmers/witnesses. Post an official link showing Nigeria with 120km cruise missiles. I dare you.
for now this is the only official response you deserve since you don't want to believe beegeagle that is well connected to get his credible info for his blog.

Osheku did not reveal the exact dimensions of the rockets his Centre is currently testing. But an earlier interview, with another source, left the impression that these missiles are larger than the ones Fashade had been experimenting with.

Internationally, rocketry is a sensitive subject, because it encompasses “dual use technology”—instruments that can be used, either for peaceful or military purposes. “Nigeria must, therefore, tread softly,” Mohammed allowed, ” to avoid sending the wrong signals about our intentions, which are entirely peaceful”[/quote]it's this underestimation that will continue to haunt you south africans on this thread. grin
the more you underestimate, the more heartache you'll continue to get from more exposure about Nigerian military capabilities.

you better start believing for the sake of your heart cos we won't be blamed for your sudden heart failure. grin
Foreign AffairsRe: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by chris365(m):
Mike..ZA:
You double faced pig. First you asked "for battle" now you're asking "for a war". Let me ask you this,what kind of weapons were used to crash the advance of the 47th brigade in the Lomba river battle?. What kind of prove are looking for that can help you,remove the crap out of your eyes.
getting frustrated already? grin that's what you get for talking like a goat

you helped UNITA to stop an offensive doesn't mean you won a battle. simply because FPLA didn't attack to fight SANDF. SADF showed up when UNITA was almost defeated till SADF assisted them to repel the attack. but the main battle was your offensive on cuito which cuba crushed and SADF retreated and resumed firing their G6 from afar till the war ended. history has it. you won nothing against the cubans

A major battle ensued and Angola, fearing a defeat, requested help from Cuba. With Cuban reinforcements, Cuito was held and the South African advance ended after six unsuccessful attempts to overcome the FAPLA-Cuban defences between 13 January and 23 March 1988. The SADF withdrew but continued to shell Cuito from a distance.


i'll continue to tell you that until your military wins any battle or war with the G6, you are not allowed to spew trash

and try to shut up about this out ranging trash. SADF shelled FPLA from a distance not farther than 30-40km. which proves the 70km range of your G6 to be useless. no wonder no sane army wants to buy them.
Foreign AffairsRe: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by chris365(m): 11:32am On Sep 17, 2013
Mike..ZA:
During the battle of Lomba river,out 70 T-55 tanks 62 were destroyed or disabled by the G5,G6 and Ratel ZT3(in prototype form). Remember the G5 and G6 howitzers were stationed 50km away,directed by highly Recces. The remaining 10 tanks were found abandoned,by SAn salvage crews. Now show me where Nigeria,won a battle with Nigerian weapons. Your armed forces lack experience,with that reason they should be ranked below Ethiopia and Egypt.
and you claim to know military when all you do is copy and paste without a proper analysis of what you copied.

i said until you can prove where SANDF won any war with your G6, you are not permitted to spew trash and yet you did.
Foreign AffairsRe: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by chris365(m):
saengine: 1. Why you are talking about Starstreak is beyond me. Are you now claiming that Nigeria is developing surface to air missiles? Starstreak and Nigerian fireworks are in a completely different class. Infact it is an insult to British engineers that you even dare mention their product while talking about Nigerian fireworks.


2. Who is beeagles's sources? Did he see the launch himself or are illiterate Nigerian farmers such as yourself claiming to see such things? 70km and 120km according to who? I never said the Epe is a lie. I only said Nigeria is NOT launching any missiles with 70km or even 120km range. You are only trying to developing rocket engines, simple. Completely different ball game to guided missiles.


3. You say that "range is many times more than altitude. Sometimes 7 times greater." This is a direct quote from you.

Now tell us fool. If according to your illiterate sources the initial range of the 1st rockets tested was 70km. And the initial rocket altitude seemed to reach 3km. How did this rocket manage to travel 23 times further in range than it could in height? I'll tell you......because there was no 70km or 120km flight, simple. Your so called scientists were firing rockets straight up into the air, like I've always been saying.


SA amateur
https://rocketry.co.za/saasa/index_htm_files/12.jpg


Nigerian Phd
www.nairaland.com/attachments/1309865_NIG_MISSILE_TEST_EPE_jpg9d84c4fb65d7ebb278b8555f7148e1d3
now use your fish brain and compare the two pictures you posted.

Which of the two looks more like a guided missile. That's if you know how a guided missile is launched.

stop talking like a novice abeg.

here's an example of how a cruise missile is launched to give you an idea of what Nigeria may be trying to develop


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ZlXSOKsxas

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FwV-JucQktQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cbMDvmlyQE

the altitude is not as important as the range
Foreign AffairsRe: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by chris365(m): 8:34am On Sep 17, 2013
zaandrew: I wonder how a 3km range missiel will make nigeria somthing speciol.

I mean that shorter than the ingwene from the 1980s. All so no menstion is made of a payload, speed or any thing. Right now all we know is that a misseil flew 3km straight up and yet the fools here are going on like nigeria invinted a working railgun.
a while back you rejected the fact that Nigeria was developing it's own missile, now you are crrying over just a little information that was released to ease our neighbors fears.

Admit it.... The news took you by surprise.

It's an ongoing project and they might have passed the 120km range cos they just tested another missile last week (i live close to epe so i always see the smoke traces passing through ajah when i jog early in the morning).

The 120km range was achieved early this year.

And get this straight mr chef.. Altitude is different from length. The length a missile can go is different from the height it can attain. The length is more important.

Or do you need tutorial for it?
Foreign AffairsRe: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by chris365(m): 8:24am On Sep 17, 2013
zaandrew: Thise solders are enemys to nigeria and a danger to other nigerian solders. Of course acstion will be tacken. Not taking acstion means the entire nigerian milltary is under BH control.

How ever why has there not been a formaly public invistagstion on the alged abuse to civlians in the north. The miltary has put a media black out in the area and that means when reports come out of nigerian solders abusing civlian they can not be proven or dissproven but only a guilty man tries to hid the facts. Or what of the ecomog war crimes in serrie leon and libberia. No acstion.
since you are so concerned about war crimes, why don't you start from US soldiers and their atrocities in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Give it a rest cos you are just dribbling your head here.
Foreign AffairsRe: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by chris365(m): 11:20am On Sep 16, 2013
Mike..ZA:
Show us "adult talk" pedo. All I have seen you doing was posting links and cut&pastes. You have no "military knowledge" pedo.
wow, you actually responded to this simple and shot jab twice. Must have hit your balls there grin.
Foreign AffairsRe: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by chris365(m): 11:19am On Sep 16, 2013
Mike..ZA:
The fact remains: South African made weapons will out range and overwhelm your armed forces. Systems like the AMLAGC(G7 prototype).
untill you can show us one battle south africa has won with the denel weapons (even if it's against rebels), you are not permitted to spew this trash talk.
Foreign AffairsRe: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by chris365(m): 11:16am On Sep 16, 2013
zaandrew: Missbehaver is one thing hell I will even accept crimnal activty. But tresone, puting the lives of your felow comrads at risk? In old times you don't get the privlage of a grave for that.


The fact that they got in over rules any good from there arrest.
this your post is very laughable.. It reminds me of one question a friend continues to ask; why is it that when a western country does something wrong, nobody talks. But when Nigeria does the same, the whole world cries. Isn't that just stup1d?

US soldiers have done the same countless times and it's considered normal right? Do your research and you'll be surprised.

Your soldiers are not fighting internal battle so you won't understand what it means.

The main thing is that the army refuses to be compromised.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 (of 54 pages)