₦airaland Forum

IbroSaunks:
well the fact remains that women would always be the higher gender in the worlds population. who would now marry them, is up to u maybe??
and its only immature people that let their natural flaws control how they behave bro!

it's a myth that there are more women than men in the world.
the fact is there are more men than women in the world and if a woman cannot get a husband, she should marry her career, adopt a child and enjoy her life till death comes.

must everyone marry?
in their selfish bid to marry, they go to a peaceful home and destroy it for the first wife.
there's no woman in the world that would be happy her husband is getting another woman. even when they agree to it, it's because they have no choice!

nokia3310:
And i can assure you that most of the immorality you see on the streets or anywhere in Muslim dominated states are mostly perpetrated by your Christians brothers and sisters

except that christians don't wear hijabs.
all the ones i saw or spoke to were muslims and they were ready for instant s[i]e[/i]x before alhaji comes back from work.

[quote author=Okija_juju link=topic=792568.msg9452104#msg9452104 date=1320070745]I'm sorry dear, but Its not like that. I just make them feel good, give them the attention their husbands fail to give them. And moreover, I knew both of them before they were forced into marriage. Atimes most women who cheat on their husbands dont do it because they are being sexually starved,  but cos they are emotionally neglected by their husbands, and thats where I come in.

I dont like it but if I dont do it, some other punk would just take advantage of them.[/quote]you are a tool!

so you are justifying fuckin other people's wives?
you are not even scared he might lace them with juju to test their fidelity.
if there's any justice in the world, you will die on top of one of them very soon and i will laugh at your obituary.

Emperoh:
^^^^
Totally hilarious!!!
Evra is a tool. What a prankster!!
What was he playing at?

make SAF catch am!!

saf saw him - didn't you see the elbow he rammed into evra's belly?

IbroSaunks:
my sister was a single mother of two and a doctor. her 1st husband was a, well, he was an !he divorced her, for a few years she was single, and my parents had to support her alot with taking care of the kids
a few months ago, she met someone else that was married to someone already. his wife and my sis were even namesakes. the man had the intention of marrying my sis, and his 1st wife, being the noble muslimah that she is, consented. now shes married again and she's happier. at least she's not lonely anymore. and her husband has lifted some of the weight off. so what can u say about that?
the fact is, there are advantages to polygamy that most people do not take into consideration before criticizing it. people need to open their minds

there's no advantage in polygamy - there's always conflict in the family. women are naturally jealous beings and for that reason, there can never be peace.
most of them smile in public and harbour evil vices in their hearts. some do juju and other metaphysical stunts. this then transcends to the children and so on and so forth.

nokia3310:
Talking about discipline now, Muslims have the highest order of morality on earth, even in Nigeria here the rate of immoral acts such as: fornication, adultery, abortion etc is higher in Christian dominated states than in Muslim dominated states

don't let those hijabs deceive you.
i have been to the north and the immorality rate in those states makes a mockery of babylon in the bible.

kponkish:
Share your experiences

hell no!
people love with their eyes open these days.

your kind of love can only be found in the 70s when indian movies reigned supreme.

chamotex:
Molde win their FIRST title in 100 years thanks to 20Legend.
Fergie sign him up . . . to replace Phat Phelan

hehe
hopefully, they celebrated like this when united won it at blackburn last season

[img]http://www.abload.de/img/evrne2u.gif[/img]

4llerbuntu:
all hail the great retardeen loudmouth.

4llerbuntu the homoerotic peasant!
all hail the daftest member of a community of 800,000 heads.

are your eyes functional at all? so 30 mins of footy gives a professional footy player fatigue?

who played for 30 mins?
the mumu cannot even count. cech came in the 60th min plus extra-time.

y cant u just shut the fook up for once and stop embarassing urself? nateevs used to be the chief opata yarner but in the past one week u have dethroned him. at times like this u are supposed to generally keep quiet so folks will move on, dummy.

you are the one embarrassing yourself like you have always done! you have never uttered any intelligent comment since you miswaka into this forum.
it's just the same gibberish and balderdash everyday of the week. if foolishness is a crime, you would be serving life imprisonment with no parole.
you are so poor in spirit object appears to you colourless.

@dudu u can see its not my fault, dullard just keeps asking for it, not that he had any rep to begin with

4llerbuntu and mumuface - the best combination of obdurate w@nkers i have ever seen.
let us know when mumuface impregnates you.

ritchboy:
^^ Coogar might have a point you know? Cech(a goalie) played for an hour midweek so he was fatigued, that's why Theo and RVP could beat him at his near post and Santos scored via his "toros"

ritchboy's summary: you guys are beginning to make me feel like a genius.
surely, you can't be this thick or have i overestimated your intelligence quotient?

[quote author=BABE! link=topic=786633.msg9448433#msg9448433 date=1320013232]Good deal. I'm down.  [/quote][img]http://www.gifsoup.com/imager.php?id=1593316&t=o[/img]

debosky:
Bloody liar - Arsenal fans are composed, comported and congenial on the way to the emirates and coming back. The only thing that gets us riled up is seeing a Totoham fan. . . .then all of a sudden you get an irresistible urge to shiite.

for where, arsenal fans are street urchins everywhere.

manmustwac:
Nice one boys

tottenham are doing very well, mate!

harry has put together a wonderful team.
just like i predicted he would do - he wants bale + van der vaart and lennon roaming behind adebayor!
luka modric and scott parker(good buy) sitting and supplying the fireworks.

if you can keep your big players fit, that 4th spot is achievable.
but but ledley king should stop his alcoholic behaviour. jeeez, that nigga drinks way too much.

[quote author=BABE! link=topic=786633.msg9448203#msg9448203 date=1320009699]hehehe. Interesting. Errmm, you're gonna pay extra bucks though---  [/quote]of course - 10 times your current pay.
28 days holiday + pension/gratuity.

Ibime:
I thought Sturridge was the Maradona that was gonna bring out the best in Torres?

According to you, Nateevs and El Guapo, the reason why Torres was playing like a cripple was because Sturridge wasnt on the pitch?

who said that?
we said mata is the magician not sturridge. what has sturridge gotta do with it?
sturridge is too selfish - he's a good player but he must learn to be a team player.

do you think sturridge through on goal could have squared the ball to a teammate like gervinho did to put van persie in a position to score into an open net? abegggggggi. let's call a spade what it is.
and bosingwa/cech - cheiii, their wages should be deducted!

https://s7.directupload.net/images/111029/7uzrdx8i.gif

Ibime:
Arsenal coulda scored 10. Im sure AVB didnt tell the players to concede the other chances either. Just Bosingwa being on the pitch is AVB's fault.

chelsea could have scored 15.
arsenal had 5 shots on targets and scored 5 goals according to opta stats.

if chelsea were that clinical, you would have put the game beyond the gaynners before their classic 2nd half display.
sturridge should never play for you guys again with his selfish mentality and profligacy in front of goal. he had all the chances and he didn't make them count.

villas-boas wanted to win and he went for it just like he did at old trafford.
it's not like his tactics didn't work. your players refused to score from the chances presented to them
villas-boas will not teach sturridge how to play the ball early instead of touching the ball 8 times before crossing.

the highlights on motd exposed sturridge - he's such a limited rookie. welbeck is eons better than sturridge.

Ibime:
Why didnt Lampard score 6 goals?

Its DD's fault he was suspended otherwise he woulda scored the 6 goals needed.

this ibime na mumu sha.

so you are going to blame that show of shame of your team on villas-boas or nateevs?
villas-boas asked 3 chelsea defenders to let walcott slip and get up and still walk with the ball into your box and score from near post?
villas-boas asked malouda to play a backpass that left john terry sprawled on the pitch. . . .
villas-boas asked bosingwa to keep van persie on his left foot(van persie's strongest foot) and put a piledriver in chelsea's net?

your punditry has gone down the drain. you need to be crucified or set on fire . . . . . . . .or both!

[quote author=BABE! link=topic=786633.msg9448151#msg9448151 date=1320008659]lol-- No mind am.

Sir, what does working for you as "Siri" entail? [/quote]--body massage
--office duties
--bedroom business.

kulyie:
ok i ve bin in dis relationship 4 some tym now and it as its own fair of great moments as wel as calenging tyms.anywayz i n my fiancee decided to ave fun,so we agrid to go to d beach.we went wit a happy mood,jisting n lafin out our jokes.we tuk pictures n really ad a nice tym,but it was as if devil was waiting 4 us b4 he cud strike.anywayz as we were about to live,my fiancee said pleas lets stay in dis hut,beach water has splashed on my fone n its affectin it,so he dismantled everytin n waited 4 it to dry b4 putin it on n so i said lease dont let dis fone waste our tym,ill b doin d rest in d car n if i cant,ill give my kid bro to fix it 4 me or take it to a fone repairer,anywayz i managed to fix d tin,so on our way to get to d car,my fiancee said bring d suya we bot,lets eat it n i was like its nt decent eating wile walkin to d car,we r almost at d car,wen we get to d car den we can eat d suya he den insisted dat i must bring it n i dint know wen i started yelling (i dint min to,it was out of anger n a silly middle aged couple passed by in their jeep,saw me yelling,luked at him n started lafin.he,broke his glases n walkd out on me.i dint even realise d silly couple saw us in an arguement n dint realise d havoc dey've caused.afta walkin out on me i felt bad n confused,i sat on d grass tinkin n feelin bad.i decided to live n saw im waitin outside d gate.out of anger n resentment i walkd passed him,cos i was angry e walkd out on me wen i got to d car i entad n he dint say a word 4 ova an hr,i left him to calm down n afta calmin down i said i'm sory,e just luked at me shook is ead n said ok,i tried petting im n said we left happily we sudnt b goin bak in dis mood,e still dint say anytin,all e said was thanks 4 d embarasment n a tear dropped from his eyes,i felt so bad n felt i caused everytin.if nt 4 me yelin,dose couple dat pasd dat i dint even see wont ave lafed as he claimed but my fear is dat i've realised that he gets angry ova lil issues even b4 dat day n am scared weda i sud still go on wit d relatnsi or break it cos a woman livin wit an angry man is as bad as a man livin wit a nagging wife.i'm afraid dat is anger wud nt degenerate to violence wen we get marid.nls do u tink i shud ignore dis part of him even tho its is weakness oweva he's so great,caring n loving.nls pls advice

pathetic penmanship!
how some of you managed to graduate is a mystery with this rubbish text-typing. na by force to use the internet?

@ topic,

yes - i think you should leave the dude.
you don't deserve a gentleman like him. you kicked him in the balls in public - you are lucky he isn't a man like me. i would have slapped you repeatedly.

if you don't know - now listen attentively.
loads of men won't even bother if you insult them in private. as long as there's no 3rd party listening in or passing by - most men would take slaps from their partners and laugh about it. but if you try it in public - you are asking for trouble! men don't like to be seen as pu[i]s[/i]sies - let that be a lesson to you.

macjive01:
YORUBA  crime wave sweeps through Britain
Jason Bennetto

[img]http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSYw4cVFGTygqWAvjpsBzYluwyO5DHSObo6w-0wffTtXc_cNAyJZw[/img]

The intelligence agencies MI6 and MI5 are being used to clamp down on fraud and drug-dealing by West African gangs. Jason Bennetto, Crime Correspondent, investigates a trend costing Britain billions of pounds a year.

The criminals, mainly Nigerians, have been discovered working inside government departments, the police and tax offices. The level of crime is so serious that the National Criminal Intelligence Service will tomorrow announce an expansion of its work against the gangs.

Agents and eavesdropping equipment from MI5, MI6 and the listening base at the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) in Cheltenham are being used to investigate Nigerian crime. The cost of the fraud alone is pounds 3.5bn a year, says the NCIS.

The fraudsters concentrate on con-tricks and benefit fraud, drug-trafficking, mainly cocaine, and illegal immigration. The intelligence agencies are assisting NCIS and British forces in some of the most serious cases. The secret services can provide expertise in infiltrating the gangs, bugging, covert surveillance and identifying targets.

The gangs, which have strongholds in the US and most European countries, form networks to siphon money and have proved difficult to break into. Activities by West African criminals that have been detected include:

At the Treasury Solicitor's office, the Government's lawyers, a worker was using the fax to work a scam involving advance fees. She was admonished and sacked.

An employee at the Department of Social Security was creating false National Insurance numbers and identifications which were being used to claim benefits such as education grants and child allowance. One individual was found with 100 separate identities.

A worker at one of the Inland Revenue's accounts offices was caught photocopying incoming company tax returns, cheques, and headed notepaper. These were sold to a contact who wrote to the banks and set up standing orders for small amounts to be paid into their accounts every month.

The Metropolitan Police had a problem with cleaners found looking for data and addresses in a West End police station.

An estimated 500,000 "advance-fee fraud" or "419" letters attempting to con people by promising risk-free cash are sent by West Africans, mainly from Lagos, around the world every year. The "419" scam is named after the section of the Nigerian penal code dealing with fraud. Thousands of individuals and companies in Britain are randomly written to and asked if they will help transfer millions of pounds of government money out of Nigeria in return for a cut of the cash.

All they supposedly have to do is provide bank details. But once hooked they are asked for an "advance" or have money removed from their accounts. Millions are stolen this.  .  .  .

Abeg read the rest here

http://www.igbolandforum.com/index.php?topic=598.0

you are a disgrace to your biological parents and the community that sponsored your education.

[quote author=inspired_m link=topic=792422.msg9447875#msg9447875 date=1320004507]Abeg O No Put Dbanj For Trouble O

That Car Cost less than $70,000 And that is if it is the The Vantage

There are Cheaper Specs that Cost Less than $70k

And With $40k you will get same Spec, Like for Like.

Its not a Big Deal.[/quote]you got there before me. . . . .you can get that car for $60k
and there's no proof d'banj paid for it cash down. this could have been gotten in any of those monthly finance schemes.

chamotex:
Is Chicharito better than Berbatov?

not in every game. in the matches where the opposition are comfortable defending deep, chicharito is useless.
in the games where the opposition want to attack(in most away games), chicharito is king. this is why he's more effective in away games than home games.

Is Rooney better than Berbatov?

no! but the combination brings the best out of rooney.

I'm I better than Berbatov?

in the whole of nairaland, only coogar is better.

We can make comparisons all day long but that is not the point.
Welbeck has taken his chance, let him lose his place by his own doings.

has he really taken his chance? how?
welbeck has been hit n miss.

Even Chicha is ahead of Berbatov at the moment. When he gets his chance he should take it.

i laugh in mike phelan - just like johnny evans is ahead of ferdinand, right?

We tend to play about 60 odd games every season so he will defo get it.

i agree!

And what's with Fergie's business with England?
He doesn't give a hoot about the 3 Lions abeg

http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/news/Manchester-United-striker-Wayne-Rooney-can-be-replaced-for-England-by-Danny-Welbeck-says-Sir-Alex-Ferguson-article812622.html

yes, he doesn't give a hoot indeed!

ismaeel86:
Among the 99.8%, 80% are over weight while 18% are slim but still have pot belly, 1.8% are suffering from hormonal inbalance. According to a research carried out by a reliable source who choose to remain anonymous, most black females have pot belly due to the following reasons:

1. Attending wedding parties so that they can have free food and drinks. And most of these foods are high in calories and fat contents such as jollof rice and huge slice of beef, small and big stout, pounded yam, amala, chin chin, lacasera and can drinks.

2. Most black females are now heavy drinkers as they are now competing with guys in this act. you can find them in most joint and clubs consuming the liqour and drowning in it like fish.

3. Most African girls have lost their African values and dont like cooking fresh food but instead prefer eating junks such as boli and groundnut, gala and lacasera, and fast food. this is beacuse most of them are now working class and have little time to prepare a good meal.

4. Finally, the african weather is very hot and humid, which makes a lot of people to drink plenty of water. some girls can consume up to 60 litres of water in a day. and the water they consume are not hygenic.

i hope you realize we are not talking about camels here.

freecocoa:
No
I don't support that,you could spend weekends with him or even a few weeks but living together is not right.
For the person talking about snoring,if she sleeps for a night at your place,is it not enough to detect the snoring habit?

a night is not enough to detect.
many nights would certainly tell me if the snoring was one-off or a habit!

leeluv:
my husband has been sexually harassing his step daughter who is 13yrs. my daughter told me and i confronted him. he said its a spiritual attack.  i further found out that he attempted to Be Intimate with my younger sister who lived with us some years ago. when i confronted him, he was being aggressive initially and then blamed me for the cause.  we have children together. i also realised he has been texting other women. he has said he is sorry after i told him i will report him to the police and social services. what do i do. i honestly love him, but i don't know if i still am. he is on holiday when i all these issues came up and he is yet to return.

perhaps, you have not been servicing your husband very well in the bedroom.
if the dog bites all the time, then the owner should be held responsible for abusing the dog.

you are the fault here, not your husband.
whenever a man is that randy to the extent of incestuous s[i]e[/i]x, then the wife is doing something wrong.

chamotex:
C'mon guys . . .
Gary Neville was not the best right back in England at the age of 20/21
Scholes was never bossing the midfield at that age . . . he actually started as a supporting striker.

so are you saying welbeck is better than berbatov?

i know fergie is doing his best to put welbeck on the plane to euro 2012 but fergie is a bit foolish doing that at the expense of berbatov and chicharito. we were so blunt against city when we had 11 men on the pitch. with city sitting deep to defend, welbeck lost the key to open them up - a feat berbatov would have achieved without breaking any sweat.

berbatov is miles better than welbeck in terms of retaining possession in the final third and linking up with team-mates. welbeck has a rather poor first touch, he doesn't score often and he's sometimes lost(walcott's syndrome) the moment he has possession of the ball.

yes, he's young with so much ahead of him but bedding him should be gradual. we have been ordinary in the attack often this season because of welbeck - cos he doesn't scare the opposition.

RuuDie:
Everton were tired  
Ol' boy go rewatch the match again

everton only huffed n puffed. they offered nothing meaningful in the first half.
pray tell - how many saves did de gea make throughout the match?

Chelsea lost because they didn't take their chances earlier on, played a rubbish high defensive line and they didn't try to do what they usually did to Arsenal sides in the past- outmuscle them!

in the first half - chelsea lost because they didn't take their chances.
but even then, chelsea don't give up - you can always expect them to crank up the pressure in the 2nd half when losing. i saw none of that yesterday. arsenal just picked them off and took them apart. those chelsea players were fatigued.

Sturridge clearly should have been taken off from like 15mins. . . . . .all in all, on accounts of the second half performance, arsenla deserved a win but 5 goals flatters them somehow - hope they don't get it into their heads that they've fully turned the corner for good!

i think the walcott goal, and the last two van r@pist goals were gifts from the chelsea defence. whether it was letting walcott slip, fall and then get up in front of 3 defenders to score or terry slipping and letting van r@pist clean through. . . it was just a poor defensive effort by chelsea

i don't think the last 3 goals that they conceded had anything to do with tactical ineptness - it was just fatigue!
walcott was surrounded by 3 players, slipped and got up somehow in front of all 3 then proceed to shoot near post against petr cech and beat him.

john terry incident was just a poor backpass compounded by terry's bad positioning then diving when he knew he couldn't get in a race issue with robin van persie - a fraction of the blame must also go to the rookie manager(villas-boas)! it is clear that he's still got a lot to learn as a manager.

firstly, he can be too attacking at times and he needs to learn when to apply the reins and get his side to hold back a bit. i think he played right into arsenal's hands. arsenal are a side who usually struggle when sides play ugly football and don't open up too much, however chelsea did the complete opposite of that.

if all sides played against arsenal like chelsea did last night, arsenal would have won loads of treble!
standard - chelsea's gameplan against arsenal the last few years has been something like "let them dominate possession, as long as we keep shape - we'll break and hit them on the counter"

while it was refreshing to see villas-boas adopting a different game-plan that must have suited neutral fans like myself, it was a tactical harakiri considering the fact that half of his team were knackered.

games at stamford bridge have been [b]tight affairs [/b]since the jose mourinho days, where the formula to beat arsenal was perfected - cede possession to arsenal and let them dominate whilst you hit them on a counter -

2004/05: chelsea 0-0 arsenal (20 apr 2005)
2005/06: chelsea 1-0 arsenal (21 aug 2005)
2006/07: chelsea 1-1 arsenal (10 dec 2006)
2007/08: chelsea 2-1 arsenal (23 mar 2008)
2008/09: chelsea 1-2 arsenal (30 nov 2008)
2009/10: chelsea 2-0 arsenal (7 feb 2010)
2010/11: chelsea 2-0 crsenal (3 oct 2010)

yesterday, it was chelsea that actually had more possession than arsenal. i dunno if villas-boas copied fergie's scripts by going gung-ho and expecting arsenal to lose 8-2 with his cavalier attitude and playing a high line in the defence. the fact remains it has never happened under wenger to be out-possessed by chelsea and villas boas must take the blame for that.

ritchboy:
^^ How many Chelsea players that started today made the XI against Everton? I count one!!!

it's not about starting. . . . .it's about travelling, you geriatric philistine!
they all travelled to merseyside. . . . .played 120 mins on wednesday night and they were the first to play apart from united. . .

besides that, chelsea played 10 men against 11 for most parts of the 2nd half and the extra time. . . .chelsea were spent!
do you people actually understand fatigue or you just stare at the tv like mongrels? christ!

4llerbuntu:
u dey mind coogar, his brain is in his arse.

you recto-cranially inverted peasant. . . .it's been confirmed you would die via [i]s[/i]tupidity!
your mental power and that of a slug is at par.

do u even bother to check the things u write?  was this the same 11 that chelsea played  in the carling cup?  besides since when did playing midweek become an excuse to get tonked by the worst arsenal side in living memory?

they played during the midweek late into wednesday with 10 men. . . .they played full 120 mins.

they shipped 5 against a side that had not won away in the league since last season, lost against a side with a baby giraffe Cb playing RB, a tall ponderous elephant in CB and a overweight left winger disguising as a LB.

i am glad you know your club is packed with baby giraffes and ponderous elephants.
fans like yourself complete the package - the club of mental handicaps.  

a top 4 side that knows its gonna play midweek games all  season?  mcheew, guy stick to yarning dust about anderson joor

i give up!
just so you know - if you marry a tool like yourself, you shall produce simpletons.

StarBoard:
Dr. Conga,
You make me laugh.Unfortunately you should know better than some things you drop in here.
Ritchboy and I don't see eye-to-eye but he has punctured your argument with that question.

if you agree with what ritchboy said then you are weaker mentally than i originally thought. mind, i didn't give you much at first so you have sunk to the lower rung of the 3rd rate pundits in this habitat.

If Chelsea are going to be clinging to the "tired from midweek" alibi to give us the horror show from yesterday,then they shouldn't be listed as contenders.The top sides know they are going to be playing midweek games most of the season if they want to win something,but you fail with honors to realize that when you post just because you want to justify your position.

they played 10 men against everton's 11 for 1 hr late into wednesday night. they must have travelled by coach to the merseyside and back after the game(probably on thursday morning) and they played as early as 12pm on saturday. there's what you call fatigue. the others on the bench don't have to play to be fatigued. travelling on it's own is fatigue.

You told us United were tonked because they played 45 mins a man down.Now Chelsea lost because they were tired and it's only October end.Isnt that tired excuse looking out of place even if their entire 11 played at midweek?
Abeg your excuse is half-assed.It's as "tired" as itself.

if you think city xi could have beaten united xi 6-1 then i reiterate you and 4llerbuntu must be siamese twins cojoined by brain cavity!
what has city/united game gotta do with this? city led 1-0 before red card. score was 6-1 after the sending off and you still think 11 vs 10 wasn't culpable for the massive loss. as a united fan, you should be ashamed of your own footie intelligence. it's as wack as puke.

then you went on taking about chelsea. the same chelsea side played till past 10pm on wednesday night. slept at merseyside, coached back to london on thursday morning to start preparing for the arsenal game by saturday noon! what happened when united lost to bayern munich in 09/10?
played 10 men for 40 mins against the nazis on a wednesday night - faced chelsea at noon on saturday and lost! lost because they were laboured, leggy and mentally spent!

these are humans not machine.
chelsea were only good value for money in the first half.
in the 2nd half, they were not at the races at all. they showed no bite and hunger known to chelsea sides when looking for goals!
i have to conclude most nigerians watch football with their asses, not with their brains and sadly, you are one of them.

Orikinla:
Love heals all ills, including old wounds.
But if only we are willing to take the medicine of love, even when it is bitter and sour.

i disagree. . . . .love is pain!

love will get you killed.

Emperoh:
^^^^
still not a good excuse IMO.
I won't conclude on them until after december.

i won't conclude on any of the top teams until march at least.
this is the premier league not serie a. yes, city are motoring on but how many big teams have they played in their 10 league games?
some perspective please!!

Emperoh:

During the days of Mourinho, Chelsea scoring first means it will be as hard as cement to win such a game.
But they looked a tad vulnerable and really flimsy at best. . . the defense was shyte.
Was tiredness making Cech concede nasty goals? All the five goals bar one were ball he could stop.
See the space for RVPs fourth goal!!

they were tired - just like everton!

nothing serious to deduce from the game apart from the fact that chelsea lost 3 points and arsenal won 3 points.
if they play the same match again, chelsea might win. it was at best end to end. arsenal were vulnerable as well but chelsea failed to take their chances. chelsea actually had more shots on target than arsenal but scored less.

elega:
@ coogar: i wouldn't want to discover
my partner is a locomotive train - with the
way she snores. if u luv her, that won't stop u from going ahead wit d marriage na.

i am not capable of loving any woman to the extent of putting up with her snores for the rest of my life.

Ibime:
Lots of peeps giving Sturridge stick online but I wont blame Sturridge. He's a striker not a winger. Every time he makes a dribble, he almost loses the ball. His play is too loose and he is not protective of the ball like a real winger or midfielder.

He should play as a point man and let Anelka take the right wing. Chelsea has no right-winger as good as Anelka. Sturridge is just being moved to the wing to accomodate Torres.

sturridge cost chelsea the game in my opinion. looking at the chances created, chelsea should have been out of sight but sturridge felt he was a superman. for arsenal's conversion rate to be better than chelsea's at the bridge is a testament to sturridge's profligacy in front of goal. chances after chances when a simple pass to a teammate would have sufficed. he should learn from gervinho!

when a good team is on top of their opponents, they have to score goals. when chelsea were on top, they failed to make it count. when arsenal were on top in the 2nd half, they took their opportunities very well. it became end to end at the death and arsenal were worthy winners. chelsea were particularly poor in the final third and the defence was mehhh.

StarBoard:
Crappy excuse.
Like we are supposed to care.
Their defending was woeful,tired or not. They entered  the carling cup and used a vast majority of their first team side.Whose fault is it they couldn't kill off a game in 90 minutes while playing with an extra man?

they played a premier league side in that competition not aldershot. . . . and they played on wednesday and they played in the early kickoff at 12.45pm. they were knackered.

United lost 1-6 because we were a man down according to you.Chelsea had 11 men and stll shipped in 5 horrendously weak goals against a dodgy Arsenal side who hadn't won away in the EPL all season.
Tremendous worlds apart

so because of that chelsea aren't a title contender? after just 10 league games?
you make me laugh. . . . .

chamotex:
Wasn't fun to watch but I'd take the 3 points.
I told coogar Fergie would stick by Evans . . . smh

helping his confidence i think - evans is running on his last life.

StarBoard:
@coogar,
Do you still fancy Chelsea for the title,judging from the defensive debacle at SB today?
I still take City over them

we lost 1-6 at home last weekend.
do you still fancy us for the title?

chelsea were utterly tired today.
the slugfest with everton didn't help matters during the week. they played 120 mins.
little wonder everton lost at home and chelsea also lost at home.