₦airaland Forum

9jaganja:
Lol,  dude your idea of rap seem to be all battle lol,

it's not even about battle. . . .it's about presence on a rap beat!!! killah priest is too weak when he is featured. no presence, nothing to lay claims to apart from making good songs solo. but if you feature canibus on a track, he's going to outshine you. . . .standard!

canibus adores killah priest and their niches in rap are basically different. When Canibus tried to get on Killah priest's niche, he failed woefully,

more like killah priest worships canibus. why would canibus try to get on the niche of killah priest's? people will make up all sorts in an argument. listen to ibime(your co-killah priest fan). he knows canibus in his prime >>> than any rapper that ever touched the mic.

Dude,  killah priest is not a battle MC like Canibus who prays and spray on em naaaa,  If you wann compare Canibus' beef, go see as LL sent his career south with just 1 track,

except it was the other way round. canibus murdered ll in 97/98. since then ll's career just went phbbbbt. 2nd round k.o is the best diss record of all time. a newbie taking on a rap giant back then. . . . .abeg, leave story.
years later he was appearing in movies to make ends meet. canibus still went on to make classics after then. rip the jacker was in 2003(a classic).

Seriously, they rap about different things so no platform for comparisons ok?
And dude, don't be hating on master ace mehn!!! Go to brooklyn and make noise about master ace like that, they'll make you enjoy the songs before beating you up,

masta ace? what won't i hear?
why not mention chubb rock, diamond & psycho-neurotics, bushwick bill, onyx, guru, etc.
all these ones are b-rated rappers. . . .i only reckon with the elite.

Forget about violent rappers dude,  It is a result of lack of creativity really, I can watch a movie where they shoot, I can't listen to a rapper screaming I'll shoot you on radio,

canibus spits more science than any of them. as far as subject matter goes. . . .a discography of canibus albums will teach you more science than studying astro-physics in any ivy league university. why do you think his fans are fewer than his counterparts, the average joe in brooklyn does not understand his scientific lines. bis is deep. . . .deeper than the pacific.

davidylanI:
spambot saved your butt.  I had an entire lecture for you.

the spambot must hate this thread. . . .can be quite frustrating typing a beautiful piece with spambot swallowing it.
now to the proceedings. . . .

I never at any point thot sera was the name of a person . . . i knew that long long ago before you could tie your diapers. 

admit it. . . .you thought it was otherwise. . . . .it was an abstract. . . .nothing could have been written before an abstract on any experiment and if it was human serum like you think, the author would have documented how they came about it. these are professionals on the top of their game writing a clear and concise report on an experiment not davidlyan's thesis from a state university. your emphasis on patient sera in the previous page proved one thing in forensics. . . .you thought it was a name!!!

I noticed you had no rebuttal to my semi-thorough schooling of you above right?  

which semi-thorough schooling? authored by who? repost it lemme see.
i am too legit to back down from mild debates such as this one. . . . .i don't create chaos and anarchy, i preserve them.
if you have any other thorough schooling in your top drawer, abeg bring it on.

9jaganja:
Thanks y'all,

Dude stop comparing Canibus and rappers like Killah priest and Canibus. Canibus will probably laught at you if you say he is better,

The only time Canibus tried to be like killah priest was in his "to whom the beat tolls" and seriously he failed at it,

Killah priest dedicated his rhymes to something higher level. He pictures things in his head with and give them a verbal graphic representation, 

He can make you imagine ancient times without having to watch movies,  Seriously dude,

will you guys stop chatting bollocks. . . .who is killah priest in comparison to the god of rap(bis)? this is like comparing yakubu to messi.
killah priest is not and can never be as deep as bis. . . . .make we sabi our level, abeg. definitely, priest has a better catalogue of albums cos he makes good songs but in the art of lyricism. . . .it's a no brainer!!
of course, if the comparison is between killah priest and duds like kanye, papoose, lil wayne and the other clowns in the rap world these days then priest is se[i]x[/i]. . . . . . .against bis? priest will be slaughtered!!!

ritchboy:
Messi still has at least two more World Cups to compete in. Ronaldo RETIRED with ZERO UCL!

it's not about the ucl. . . . .it's about playing in different teams and doing well there.
i asked. . . has messi won anything outside barcelona?

Hehehe, Ronaldo's record is so poor you had to add non-existent league titles with PSV & Barca
"European Cup" = Europa League, i dey

european cup is european cup. . . . .you might need to check the quality of teams inter trounced to win it.

Olympic gold medalist!

still an age-grade competition. under 23 but they are allowed to take few senior players in the team but still a youth competition.

Yeah, the big boys like Ronaldo feature in Europa League!

who hasn't played there? i hope you know the champions league format was different when ronaldo was at his peak(96-2000). in those days, na quality teams they play europa league not these days when england have 4-5 teams in the ucl, spain have 4, etc. back then. . .the quota was different. chelsea(days of vialli, zola, etc) were europa league regulars. abeg, check the history!

davidylan:
refresh your browser and read my rebuttal. As for asking where anything human was mentioned - i'm assuming you cant read a title too or do you need glasses?  of the highest order.  Dont know what rat brain membranes are for in an RRA? That is supposed to be college pharmacology . . . oh i forgot, many of you have not even passed there yet.

stop being a fool. . . . . .the title is the experiment on human(that i agree) but the abstract you quoted was talking about the tests carried out on a rat's brain membrane and the excerpt you quoted was lifted from the abstract(talking about the rat's brain membrane).

i have lifted the whole passage and anyone who comes to read it will see you as a semi-illiterate that you are. after so many years doing your pharmacology, you still thought sera is the name of a patient. this is at best laughable. i will print out your post and paste it on ma wall so i can have something to laugh at when i am bored.

davidylan, you are a living proof of divine sense of humour.
i am thankful for tools like you and sagamite. . . . .cos without you guys, the rest of us wouldn't have succeeded in life.

davidylan:
This  has reached nauseating proportions . . . please read the TITLE of the paper where the initial discovery was made - http://www.springerlink.com/content/np8132074l277047/

It clearly spells the sample as HUMAN SERA!

stop embarrasing yourself, davidylan.

you quoted the abstract. . . . .not the whole experiment.
the abstract is like the preface to a project. . . . they were explaining what happened when the experiment was performed on a guinea-pig and they were just going to experiment on human membrane. . . .  that was the same abstract you quoted  before the experiment.

wetin happen to your comprehension skills. please copy and paste the whole thing and let intellectuals decipher each line one after the other.
i am tired of this argument!

A recently developed radioreceptor assay (RRA) (1) that employs 3H-naloxone and rat brain membrane homogenates was improved two ways. First, the brain membranes were preincubated in the presence of sodium ions, and second, manganase-II ions were added to the sample incubations. These changes enhanced the assay sensitivity and reproducibility with stored membrane preparations and reduced the effects of serum constituents (Na+) on ligand–receptor binding. Patient sera were assayed by radioimmunoassay (RIA) and RRA after fentanyl administration and by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and RRA after morphine administration. The results with both fentanyl assays were comparable, and no fentanyl metabolites were detectable by RRA after HPLC of serum extracts. In contrast, preliminary results with the HPLC-RRA procedure suggest the presence of an active morphine metabolite of unknown structure in sera obtained from patients on morphine therapy.

where was anything human mentioned here? where? where?? where
you need to get a refund! i mean it. i will hire a very good attorney for you. . . .all the things you learnt wasting good years in the laboratory. . . .i learnt them watching youtube.

ritchboy:
Coogar is taking the piss. . . If Messi's credentials are being questioned because he hasn't won the World Cup @ 24, Ronaldo who is retired should be considered a nonentity for his abysmal record at FOUR top European clubs.

i laugh in boko haram. you sound like the world cup is every year. . . . . by the time the next world cup comes around, messi would be 27. the same age as sneijder that pundits are saying he's too old to invest in.

ronaldo's injuries are a big excuse. . . . .he won league titles with barcelona, psv, corinthians, real madrid. . . .won european cup with inter milan. won copa america for brazil multiple times and won the world cup in 2002. the number of teams he's played and won shows he does not depend on any player to shine.

legend has it that messi has done nothing outside barcelona? true or false!!
please don't brandish any age-grade competition or the olympics. . . . .the big boys don't feature there.

davidylan:
DUDE!  

I have been in toxicology going on 7 yrs now . . . NEVER in my life have i ever seen the word "patient" used for an animal before. Sorry when we use guinea pigs (i use them for routine testing, do you?) we call them what they are "test animals/specie". Anywhere the term "patient" is used it strictly refers to humans and one seeking treatment for a condition.

This is how the dictionary defines one - Noun: A person receiving or registered to receive medical treatment.

stop embarrassing yourself. . . . .ask your professors. . . . .a patient can be an animal or thing. . . .obviously, you thought sera is a name that was why you kept repeating patient sera. . . . .how can the word "patient" be referred to as human in this context. . . .you go school at all? all these years in the laboratory and you learnt rubbish. any recipient of action is a patient. . . . . .if you dig deep into your dictionary. . . .you will find it there.

beside's the abstract you intelligently quoted mentioned rat's brain membrane. . . .not human!
davidylan, refund the fees you paid spending eons in the lab.

like i told you and sagamite. . . . . .i am the origin of science and math!

patient [ˈpeɪʃənt]
adj
1. enduring trying circumstances with even temper
2. tolerant; understanding
3. capable of accepting delay with equanimity
4. persevering or diligent a patient worker
5. Archaic admitting of a certain interpretation
n
1. (Medicine) a person who is receiving medical care
2. (Rare) a person or thing that is the recipient of some action
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/patient

debosky:
Yes Walcott can improve his decision making, yes he can get better in delivering a final ball, but which Arsenal player can't?
For all the hype we heard about in 2010/11, Walcott outscored Nasri last season despite being out injured for longer, and he also made more assists.

i think that says a lot about how pathetic nasri was than walcott's intelligence.

debosky:
If it were enough Hargo wouldn't be posting youtube videos of himself running around to convince clubs to sign him.

hargo is fulfilled. . . . .

dayokanu:
Messi also won in Argentina (Youth tournaments) just not in Elite Argentina (National team).

Bottom line was that Ronaldo was unable to win the biggest Club cup competition in Europe despite playing in Europe for most of his career

Every club competes for about 3-4 cups a season, national teams compete maximum of 3 times in 4 yrs.

youth tournament na competition? in that wise. . . . .victor igbinoba is better than rooney.
abeg, stop all those youth tournament bullshyte. . . . .by argentina, i mean the national team. . . .senior national team. competitions like copa america and the world cup or fifa confederations cup(that's 3 massive competitions that have evaded messi).

chaircover:
@coogar . . . . a whole cougar one of the fastest running animals a cleaner ke . . . God forbid

don't mind debosky. . . . . .he's a tool but not a complete tool cos few parts are missing.

dayokanu:
Coogar,

Would you hold Ronaldo Limas inability to win the Champions league or even play in a CL final against him?

i wouldn't cos he won in europe(not necessarily elite europe) but he won titles in every team he played.
messi is yet to win in the argentina shirt. that's the difference!

davidylan:
coogar pls search google well oh. You must not come back here with more nonsense pls. silly boy . . .

replied you like 3 mins after you wrote this. . . . .but the spambot swallowed it.

you were wrong. . . . . .patient sera is not human. sera is not a name(it's the plural of serum) and the word "patient" in the context it was used is the specimen(guinea pig).

patient: a person or a thing that is the recipient of some action.

davidylan:
hahahahahaha dude saw "activity in guinea pig ileum - opioid receptor binding" on the link page and automatically concluded the "experiment" was carried out on a guinea pig?  

bros abeg dont display such ignorance in public oh. Stop am! Please read the VERY FIRST LINE of the paper introduction . . . you know, under where it says "fulltext preview".

spambot did me in!

it still doesn't say the specimen wasn't guinea-pig but that's even besides the point. . . . .before we lose sight of the argument - the real debate was whether the way morphine would be medicinally administered in the hospital is the same way a user would use it? you said yes. . . . .i said no.

you said a drug can be medicinal and be destructive at the same time and you mentioned morphine as your example. . . . .and i said morphine in the same form(purity) as a user would take it? and you replied yes cos the impurity on the streets is the same as the impurity in the hospital.

you provided a link that identified the name of the impurity but not the cause/effects. . . .let's assume you are even right for argument's sake. . . .does this link now proves the way a user would use morphine is the same as a patient who uses it medicinally? of course not!

a medical practitioner will not administer morphine with alcohol to a patient in his ward, a user on the streets wouldn't know that. morphine + alcohol = fatality. a doctor will tell his patient to swallow the pill wholly so the medicine can be released slowly into the system. a user might break, chew or crush the pill which will cause too much of the drug to be released at a time. . . .

this was why i was arguing the form(physical content). how is it taken medicinally and recreationally? davidylan, there's a difference between using and abusing.

davidylan:
- From abstract of 1987 paper by Sadee - Patient sera were assayed by radioimmunoassay (RIA) and RRA after fentanyl administration and by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and RRA after morphine administration. The results with both fentanyl assays were comparable, and no fentanyl metabolites were detectable by RRA after HPLC of serum extracts. In contrast, preliminary results with the HPLC-RRA procedure suggest the presence of an active morphine metabolite of unknown structure in sera obtained from patients on morphine therapy.

See? Patients! Patient sera! Not guinea pigs! 

Pay attention next time before bleating meh like a goat on heat. 

this davidylan na proper olodo. . . . . hilly-billy on heat!
he probably thinks sera na person name

oga, sera is the plural of serum - stop claiming what you don't know. . . . .this serum might have been taken from a guinea pig.
the specimen used for the experiment is a patient.

davidylan:
hahahahahaha dude saw "activity in guinea pig ileum - opioid receptor binding" on the link page and automatically concluded the "experiment" was carried out on a guinea pig?  

bros abeg dont display such ignorance in public oh. Stop am! Please read the VERY FIRST LINE of the paper introduction . . . you know, under where it says "fulltext preview".

it still doesn't say the specimen wasn't guinea-pig but that's even besides the point. . . . .before we lose sight of the argument - the real debate was whether the way morphine would be medicinally administered in the hospital is the same way a user would use it? you said yes. . . . .i said no.

you said a drug can be medicinal and be destructive at the same time and you mentioned morphine as your example. . . . .and i said morphine in the same form(purity) as a user would take it? and you replied yes cos the impurity on the streets is the same as the impurity in the hospital.

you provided a link that identified the name of the impurity but not the cause/effects. . . .let's assume you are even right for argument's sake. . . .does this link now proves the way a user would use morphine is the same as a patient who uses it medicinally? of course not!

a medical practitioner will not administer morphine with alcohol to a patient in his ward, a user on the streets wouldn't know that. morphine + alcohol = fatality. a doctor will tell his patient to swallow the pill wholly so the medicine can be released slowly into the system. a user might break, chew or crush the pill which will cause too much of the drug to be released at a time. . . .

this was why i was arguing the form(physical content). how is it taken medicinally and recreationally? davidylan, there's a difference between using and abusing.

davidylan:
- From abstract of 1987 paper by Sadee - Patient sera were assayed by radioimmunoassay (RIA) and RRA after fentanyl administration and by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and RRA after morphine administration. The results with both fentanyl assays were comparable, and no fentanyl metabolites were detectable by RRA after HPLC of serum extracts. In contrast, preliminary results with the HPLC-RRA procedure suggest the presence of an active morphine metabolite of unknown structure in sera obtained from patients on morphine therapy.

See? Patients! Patient sera! Not guinea pigs!

Pay attention next time before bleating meh like a goat on heat. 

this davidylan na proper olodo. . . . . hilly-billy on heat!
he probably thinks sera na person name

oga, sera is the plural of serum - stop claiming what you don't know. . . . .this serum might have been taken from a guinea pig.
the specimen used for the experiment is a patient.

chamotex:
Again Dudu will disagree . . . he made us believe he was the next big thing

miyachi vs rafael(brazil shirt)

https://www.gifbin.com/bin/1232031322_fbf0ih_th.gif

davidylan:
Now back to coogar . . .

that is absolutely not true, its just laughable that you would make such a false claim. I just finished going through a typical company drug application package to the FDA. 10 alpha hydroxy morphine is a human metabolite of medicinal morphine sulfates.

Here is a paper describing the presence of 10 a hydroxy morphine in sera of patients following morphine administration. Both morphine and its 10a metabolite have similar pharmacological effects. - http://www.springerlink.com/content/w283637773338042/

Sheesh! How ignorant!  

this davidylan is an ignoramus sha.
the link you provided is inconclusive and the experiment was carried out on a guinea pig.

i can now conclude the average nigerian has the attention span of an ewe.
david, sorry - try again.

Sagamite:
That is the moronic conjecture they thought you at your quack science school?

the next thing would be for you to scan your birth cert(if you have the guts).

Cretin comes again with the claim he could not back up! person!

]

food is addictive.

You are a cretin! If it is not irresponsible, why do the leaders hesitate to admit it?
person, you don't think they will be the first to admit it is irresponsible?

because it was criminalized. . . by charlatans like yourself. how many times have the government re-classify marijuana. from class b to class c.
hell, they don't know and if it's irresponsible like you claim. . . .why are the people of the state of california pushing for it to be legalized.
they are irresponsible, aren't they? you see why i keep saying you are an asstard?

You are a cretin!
Same risks as in driving and crack? Later you will turnaround and claim you did not mean that when I start flogging you.
To compare risk, you must judge based on like for like usage, you person!

it's sad but true. your foolish self thinks because drug users deliberately used drugs, they are culpable and thus deserve no sympathy.
but by the same token, a driver who went past the speed limit and crashed and died. . . is he not culpable? is he not as irresponsible as a crack user who deliberately overdosed? can you hear yourself, geriatric charlatan?

If more people are getting injured from fights than from snake bites does not mean it is more risky to be in a fight with other people than to be biten by a poisonous snake. It might mean that in your quack community college of Science.

what a ridiculous analogy from the chief spaz himself. . . .we are talking about fatality - he's talking about getting wounded in fights and snake-bites.
you deserve a chieftancy of lunatic analogies. keep going.

What is the rate of death relative to driving volumes to the rate of death relative to crack usage volumes! person, too hard for your brain?

the stats is on google - look for it and bring the answer here. jeeez, the onus is on you to prove me wrong. don't be such a lazy fool.
step up to the task and prove me wrong the rate of death in auto-accidents is more than crack usage.

Don't you dare try  and bamboozle anyone that you are a scientist again, person. Not when your God is watching.
Which reetarded institution teaches science to those that can not analyse?
You are a person!

the same fake god who was trying to divide 300 million with 2.1 million virgin users?
you are a disgrace to humanity. an open sore on the face of humanity.

Have you not been arguing driving is more dangerous than crack? 

prove it!

You need mental health help if you cannot calculate 50% and say you are the origin of maths. Cretin!

this is because you are still a fool. 50% of the active population. it excludes babies, children under 12 and grannies in their 90s.
take this set of people out of 300 million and the number reduces to say 220 million.

Cretin! how did you use 40% as you base on stats that included one-time only users?

How did you arrive at over 50% of Americans use pot everyday.

You are that daft? Did I not tell you you are a product of a failed education?  

where in the charts did it say the 40% comprises of one-time users?
on one side of your mouth, cannabis is irresponsible, it's addictive and it damages people. . . . .on the other side of your rusty mouth, there are one-time only users of cannabis. you are a product of adult copulation gone wrong.
like i have said. . . . .delete your username and start again. you are a big foooooooooooooooooooool!

debosky:
Hargreaves would give his left nut to still be an EPL player like Emmanuel 'William Shakespeare' Eboue is.

and why should that be? he has achieved what eboue is still trying to achieve. . . .
he has won the league in 2 different countries, won the champions league in 2 different countries. . . .was england's player of the year in 2006.
i think that is enough!

[quote author=Mr_TA link=topic=716327.msg8784783#msg8784783 date=1311596744]Hargreaves was just bad luck. Played a full season very well for us and then it all went down hill after that.[/quote]he has achieved more than fabregas, nasri, sagna, eboue, van persie, etc.
not how long but how well. . . . .hargreaves one full season with man utd is better than 90% of the players in the premier league.

and that is fine by me!

RuuDie:
Definitely. . . . . .we all see the way he plays, the edge, the influence he weilds his team, thats all there is to know - not all the greats we constantly mention, won everything in football ~ but their importance to their teams, thats what made 'em the stand=outs in their respective teams!

what made em stand outs in their respective teams is their importance and the hunger to win. . . . . .messi hasn't shown that for argentina.
maradona did
zidane did
fat ronaldo did
pele did.

i urge you to go and read maradona's years in napoli.

debosky:


So you're saying tpia, DK, Bashdemy, coogar and co are just cleaners after the parry?

thunder fire your dome. . . . . .she didn't mention coogar.
she said tpia, bashdemy and dayokanu(industrial cleaners).

Sagamite:
You are some dumbshit!
No 1, cretin, you don't know how old I am. You could even be older than me. Foool!

who doesn't know how old you are. . . . .i will have to add some 21 yrs to ma age to be older than you.
you are as old as the village priest and yet i am mopping the public toilet with your face, you pederast

No 2, how can something be harmless to take when it has a potential of being addictive and it fcks you up mentally? Foool!

what a twit . . . . .food is harmless and yet could be addictive. . . .there goes your wasted education.
up in flames within a second. all what you laboured for in 30+ years, coogar just threw it out of the bin in one big swoop.

No 3, how can it not be irresponsible to take something that has potential to be addictive when you do not need to take it, you don't know you individual potential of getting harmed by it and it can fck you up if you unfortunately become the one that gets addicted?
I told you that this shredding was going to be easy.  

see this oponu. . . .is it irresponsible to eat, drink a glass of wine. . . . .can a glass of wine not make you alcoholic, phuck you up mentally, etc?
so all the priests using wine as communion are irresponsible. the past leaders of great nations who have taken marijunana and alcohol at a point in their lives are also irresponsible.

sagamite, you should chair the committee of mental-handicaps. this is so easy. . . . .it's like taking a candy from a child.

You are a cretin!
I thought you were lying here that you did science? If you were doing science in a reputable institution surely you will be able to set up a research?
Fool, how many people drive in 15mins and how many people take drugs in 15mins? Is that not the basis of proportion to make comparison?

you must have been born a schlepper. . . . . .what has the rate of people driving gotta do with the fatality attached to driving?
do people die driving? yes. . . . . .do people die taking crack? yes. same risks abound.
proportion or comparison will not make driving a safer activity than taking crack. i have produced the stats that auto-accident kills one life per 15 mins.

asking me how many people take drugs in 15 mins? go to mogadishu where simpletons like you get high on khat all day and do the stats!

Did that assessment confused your fcking daft head?

Foool, you can not judge by minutes because the volumes are very different, judge by volume of activity! Fake science student. For every million drivers driving, how many people die, compare that to every million drug users. Don't come and give your moronic simpleton analysis to your analytical God! You would get whooped!

You are a cretin!

which assessment. . . . . .sagamite whose intelligence quotient is on the negative integer is talking about analysis. you will die trying.
i am your rabbi. . . .when i speak, you keep mum and listen. i am the origin of science and math - your supreme ruler - the one whose feet you must kiss and bow to.

Who the fck are you trying to change story on? Me? SAGAMITE? The Omnicient Intellectual?

more like the omniscient fool!
your foolishness in £ is in trillions with a million exponential. let's just say your foolishness is infinite.

Cretin, your argument has been driving is more irresponsible than taking crack and you have, like the huge cretin you are, ignored rational need.
Effing Product of a failed education!

seniity must be one of your problems. . . .show me where i said driving is more irresponsible than taking crack.
liar liar, your shorts on fire.  you are a product of Reproduction gone wrong!!!

You are getting a whooping and want to switch stories? LMFAO
You are a dumbfuck cretin!
You are a person!
Where do you do the science you are claiming? What community college! If I hear you boast you do science again I will use Ogun to fck you up.

like i have told you - i am the origin of science and math. . . . . when i speak, you listen.
not your type who schooled under a mango tree in an obscure village in ogun state. you are an asstard, a leprous fuckwit with poop for brains.

The stats says 40% have used marijuana before. To any well educated individual with a single brain cell, that would include volumes of people that took a few puffs in one day and never took marijuana again. To any individual with a brain cell, they would even know majority of these are people who experimented briefly in their your, those that have not taken it for more than 30 days will be a majority of that 40%.

buhahahaha, i might need to buy this senile serial w@nker some artificial intelligence. coming from someone who said marijuana is irresponsible and addictive. . . .he's now saying some people took it once and never took it again.
what is really your point? those who took it once formed the majority of that 40%? do you have any stats to back this up or information scraped out of your diseased rectum? sagamite, give up - you are embarrassing your village on the webspace.

Now cretin, how can you say majority of americans smoke pot everyday? Foool!

because they do, asstard!

Majority of Americans do not even smoke cigarette, how can your daft arse say majority they take pot everyday?

because tobacco is far dangerous than pot, you onanist! nicotine in tobacco is addictive. . . .coming off it is physically addictive unlike pot.
how many times do i need to repeat this? are you permanently brain damaged?
trisomy 21 perhaps?

Can you see how piece easy it is for me to intellectually fck you up? You KNOW I am your Alpha and Omega!

easy for you to fck who up? the same sagamite that was calculating 2.1 million every year to get 150 million american citizens?
dem don swear for you. check your oracle - you have an unknown step-mum casting curses on your head.

I told you this would be easy. You are a Professional person!
You are a cretin!

repetition, repetition, change the record.
of course, as one of the half-baked graduates parading themselves as knowledgeable, your vocab pool is a tad shallow.

You calculation base Mr back street science cretin is to include people that have tried marijuana once or twice in their lives to calculate how many many Americans use pot everyday?

this thing dey pain sagamite o. . . . .are you weeping i have mopped the public toilet with your face.
how do you know the 40% includes people that tried it once or twice? conjecture? assumption? sagamite's psychosis or straws-clutching?
sagamite, produce your facts - you obdurate fellow.

Which failed school did you go to that passed you when you calculated half of 300m to be 134m?

300 million(excluding children under the age of 10 - who will not be expected to use marijuana).
i mentioned exclusion - but with a weak comprehension skill as yours, you would have skipped it.

person! Did you really feel confident you can ever step to me intellectually without being slaughtered?  

i have mashed you up. . . . .if you have any decorum left in your pathetic life. . . .you will log out, beg the admin to permanently ban your username and start afresh. i destroy people's reputation for fun. of all the encounters i have had, yours was the easiest to pull apart. but your pseudo-authoritative attitude would not let you agree you have been battered. . . .and i am loving it.

sagamite and coogar on intellectual level? sagamite will always be a witless apprentice.
i eat dumbos like you for lunch every other day. . . . .
you misyarn? your obituary will be read. . . .it's as simple as that. i have zero tolerance for airheads like you.

RuuDie:
But how did Weah become WPOTY ~ by virtue of his performances for Liberia

nope! by virtue of his performances for ac milan. . . .

but that's besides the point. no one is arguing about messi's wpoty. . . . .the argument is if he can compare to pele, maradona, cryuff, etc

RuuDie:
For y'all who keep referencing Argentina's lack of success and equating as yardstick for assessing the value, effectiveness of Messi ~ recall a certain George Opong Weah!!?

so you think liberia = africa as argentina = south america?

argentina won the world cup twice before messi.
what did liberia win before george weah?

argentina is a footballing nation, liberia is not.
the analogy is incomparable!

davidylanI:
this is not an issue of being daft but you being deliberately vague. Be specific before bleating at others, i cant read your mind. At least you know "form" can also mean method of ingestion.

What do you mean  by "physical form"? The active ingredient remains the same right? Water either in gaseous or liquid form will always remain H20 at the molecular level right?

Whether you inhale heroin or take it by IV injection in the hospital, the AI binds the exact same opioid receptors right? The reason why i assumed your idea of "form" meant method of ingestion is simply because looking at it in terms of "physical form" is itself quite DAFT and indicative you really have a poor understanding of biology.

If you take panadol as a tablet or crush it and inhale . . . your blood stream sees the EXACT SAME acetaminophen . . . the only difference is the rate of absorption.

What was this guy trying to convey? These dudes just want to talk, almost zero understanding of what they argue about.

Form? What has physical form to do with how your body processes the exact same chemical compound in your blood stream?

you are a tool. . . . .even after telling you i wasn't talking about the ingestion method, you still went on barking like a rabid mongrel. . . .

medicinal morphine given to patients in the hospital has no impurities and you are here saying the active ingredients remain the same. you should shred your certificates and start all over again. this was why i asked you to tell me the difference in physical form. the impurity in morphine contains opiod activity(10-alpha-hydroxymorphine). . . . .i don't have to grow old and grey in the lab to be aware of my immediate environment. i read the news everyday and i know youths take adulterated morphine(pseudo-morphine) which is not the same as the one administered to patients undergoing severe pains. so to come here and  claim there's no difference in the physical content of the morphine in the clinics and the one sold on the street corners means you are a disgrace to the institution that trained you - fact!

i can now conclude you and the other resident simpleton are twins. the difference is you came out first and sagamite is the runt(under-developed brain cells).

Sagamite:
How can you say taking something you claim is harmless is irresponsible to take? Something that you claim can not harm you?  

uncle sagamite. . . . .the old for nothing onanist. . . . .harmless to take, irresponsible to abuse.
read and digest my statement, you laboratory pederast!

How did you arrive at your risk calculations?

auto accident claims one life every 15 mins. . . . .let's ignore the ones who become physically disabled after auto accidents.
drugs don't claim one life per 15 mins. unless you are a castrated hog on the hills of kilimanjaro. . . . .this shouldn't be too ambiguous.
my fears have been confirmed - you were born idiotic.

Let, for a second, condescend to your mooronic level of thinking and ignore rational need (a concept your faeces infested brain can not grasp). What proportion of car drivers die, what proportion of drug users die? Worse still what proportion of drug abusers die compared to drivers? That is mooronically ignoring rational needs o.
Surely your argument must be "it is irresponsible to drive"? 

my argument is it is irresponsible not to drive safely. this is why driving offences are also criminal offences you geriatric camel!

I did say this was going to be easy and fun, didn't I?  
I warned the shredding was going to be casual, did I not?  
Explain to me what school you went to do your "science for ediots" that thought you that 40% is a majority?  

look at this moronic beast of burden. . . . .40% as at 2004!
are we in 2004? oh ma gosh. . . .professor sagamite cannot read the most simplistic chart - how absent-minded can a pensioner be?

Lets even ignore the everyday aspect of your mooronic statement for now. 
I wait patiently.
Now, the population of the US is over 300m. Half of that conservative base estimate is (this will surprise a foool like you with cretinous maths ) 150m.
If 2.1m are virgin users every year, explain to me how many years it will take to get to that 150m, assuming a present frequent user population of even 20% (60m Americans).

this man is a tool. 40% of the population were already taking marijuana as at 2004. it means 120 million americans had used marijuana at one point in their lives as at 2004. there are 2.1m virgin users every year since 2004. . . . .do your calculations and tell me it's not bordering on majority(excluding children under the age of 10 - who cannot use)

another dirty slap on mr sagamite's face. . . . the old tool thinks the 2.1 million will not be added to the 40% base that have already used.
you need to donate your brain to a gorilla.

Now, let me destroy your daft brain and factor in population growth.
Now explain the level of stewpidity it takes for a mooron (that claims he is studying science) to say majority Americans use marijuana every day. Majority every day?
What reetarded school is allowing you to do science?  
Professional person, who is your Alpha and Omega?  

same as above. . . . . .your calculation is very wrong. . . .
as at 2004, more than 40% of the american population had used marijuana. there are 2.1 million virgin users per year since 2004. multiply it by 7(the difference between 2011 and 2004). . . .add to the 40% base(120 million) 120 million + 14 million = 134 million americans
that is your answer you spastic brain dead peasant!!!

by the time i am done with you, you will question everything you have ever believed in.
like i said. . . . .i am your rabbi!

proO1:
What a useless thread. The deep-seated insecurity of muslims is legendary. What a laugh. The Norwegian madman who is supposedly a 'Christian Fundamentalist' (there is NO such thing; how counter-intuitive!): why did he not target muslims? ? ? All the muslim TERRORISTS that we know of, is it not Christians and western interests that they target? Indeed, did the Norwegian madman mention that he was fighting/killing tn the name of Jesus or the Bible? In that regard, is it not the usual thing for these Islamic beasts to JUSTIFY their terrorism with the name of their so-called Allah, Mohammed and Quran? Lets not indulge fools who eat their own excreta. Every now and then in the western world we hear of deranged lone gunmen who suddenly go on killing sprees without any apparent motive. This latest case obviously fits into that pattern.

Trying to exonerate Islam from its defining tenets (violence and extremism) on account of this isolated case of motive-less madness is the most idiotic thing ever.

Terrorism is not necessarily the same thing as islamic fundamentalism. We know that. Terorists might represent a broad range of ideological interests, not necessarily Islamic. But we know for SURE that there has never been and would never be an established terrorist cell/group devoted to fighting the cause of Jesus Christ or 'defending' Christianity against 'infidels' (who send them work?). In that sense, the ONLY ONLY ONLY organized RELIGION-based terrorism known to man is perpetrated EXCLUSIVELY by muslims and islamic elements; and there is no evidence to the contrary.  Only an a.s, s.h.o.l.e would try to de-Islamize RELIGION-BASED terrorism. It is exclusively an Islamic phenomenon.

Pull down this useless thread and rid yourself of this Islamic virus. It is not a religion; it is in fact an affliction. A curse. A plague. A menace to mankind.

thread is an epic fail.

norwegian does not belong to any terrorist group like al-qaeda or al-hamburger. he acted alone - killed his own people, born norwegian. he did not even go to any mosque to kill. he attacked ordinary youths. yes - what he did was evil but comparing this lad to al-qaeda is idiotic.

Ibime:
Canibus used to trash him on battle songs. There's a big difference. Killah Priest is a story teller, not a battler. His albums are like film releases. Canibus albums don't compare. Its like comparing Masta Ace to Papoose. Masta Ace albums are classic pieces of work, but Papoose would outshine him on a battle track.

masta ace? classic pieces?
ibime, you are a phat tool!!!!

masta fecking ace??

[img]http://chzgifs.files./2011/07/that-window-gets-fixed-fast.gif[/img]

davidylanI:
Dumb. Morphine is usually administered in drip form, not much different from injecting it directly using a syringe right?

don't sound too daft. . . . .when i said form, i didn't mean method of ingestion. i meant the content! the physical form!!!

cap28:
Its so easy to stand in judgement on a person and become judge jury and executioner when you have never attempted to do anything remotely interesting with your own life (davidylan).

Its so easy to pretend to have all the answers when all throughout your life all you've ever done is copy ad nauseam what has already done  before (davidylan)

mediocrity is celebrated as a desirable attribute whereas individuality, creativity, raw talent and genius is sneered at by people who have contributed nothing of note to humanity (davidylan)

Amy was a victim of a troubled upbringing - she was emotionally fragile, she was dependant on drugs and alcohol not because she was a reckless fool but because she saw it as a form of escapism from her troubled life.

[img]http://shechive.files./2010/05/1272348532_original-lol.gif?w=238&h=211[/img]

cap28, come. . . . . .are you related to sigmund freud?