₦airaland Forum

debosky: What makes me wonder more is that peeps would justify Ba's poor performances at Chelski just to spite Torres. If we all agree Torres is crap, why can't folk tell the truth about Ba's poor performances without bringing Torres into it to 'justify' how bad he has been?

the truth is bitter - these negroes would never admit ba has been a flop considering the hype surrounding his arrival. herbivores like dayo, ibime, bluediva and this goat known as lalaboi were expecting ba to come in and start scoring braces and hatricks for chelsea like he was doing for the barcodes!

lalaboi: Erm, last time i checked you was only one person, how you count as "majority" on these pages is beyond me.

the rest probably don't have the balls to say it to your face but they tell me lalaboi is a r[color=#000000]e[/color]tard!

8 assists in how many games? and how many goals? Unless I am missing something, we deserve more for 50mill. . go suck a Transversite's banana with your stoopid stats. key passes my foot. You probably dont watch half of chelsea games, you dont know what kind of pain fans derive from seeing Torress on the pitch except for his 1 out of 50chances scorings

even in 100 PL games, a striker isn't meant to be copping 8 assists from open play - who is torres assisting? are you too st[color=#000000]u[/color]pid to realise those assists should have been his goals if the chelsea system is working effectively? your criticism of torres is daft and moronic. there's always an excuse for ba when he under-performs......when torres under-performs, he is the antichrist - responsible for all the ills in the world including the killing of twins in calabar.

that fat fool known as ibime also went on a diatribe that ba is ineffective because of rafa benitez's boring system. it's amusing these myth came after ba was found to be useless in a game he should be scoring. the theory in itself is a fallacy. chelsea are not worse or any better than the previous seasons. chelsea are boring? where is this myth coming from?

MaraGod: You can only chastise who you love. we love Gevenieve, and will like her to remain modest in all

so lend us your outstanding intelligence by telling us what was immodest in what she wore?

lalaboi: We've seen countless times mister Torress looses the ball whilst we counter! I dont think we woulda scored the second goal if it wer Torress in attack, his pass would have either been too short or over hit, or would have taken the ball on a dribble rampage only to loose it.

I still wonder why Ninjas defend Torres

this is why majority of the people think you are st[color=#000000]u[/color]pid on these pages...
a striker has copped 8 assists from open play and yet you criticize his football brain and his passing? demba has not copped any assist for chelsea since january. torres cops 1 key pass per game, demba ba has 0.6 key pass per game.........chelsea are better off with torres on the pitch than demba.

debosky: ^^ What do you mean by 'directly' involved? Did he provide the assist or did he score?

the guy must be high on cheap spliffs - directly involved my arsë.....

4llerbuntu: for a top striker? INSIGHTFUL
is saving the ball alone not productivity for a goalkeeper too?

you are talking rubbish as usual - torres scores goals or assist goals......statistics say he's assisted 8 league goals this season. when he's not scoring, he's assisting at the very least. demba ba rarely scores and he rarely assists. what positive contribution has he made this season apart from scoring 2 goals against southampton in the cup. southampton - a club whose priorities lie elsewhere.

answer a simple question and they are pussyfooting - ba(chelsea) vs ba(newcastle) which of them is more productive? ibime blames ba of chelsea on rafa, 4llerbuntu is stinking up the whole place with insipid thought process and el guapo speaks half-truth that newcastle made better use of ba than chelsea is currently doing. if the chelsea system has diminished ba's scoring prowess, why should we expect much from torres?

That means there's been a shitload of crappy strikers in football, eg Ruud van Nistelrooy, Raul, Fat Ronaldo etc etc. wow. this is what iv been saying, no better striker than TH14

your logic amuses me....
what has raul, ruud and fat ronaldo gotta do with this argument. is it normal to you that a striker has 8 goal assists from open play? even if you didn't finish primary school, some things are freaking obvious that you don't need a degree in rocket science to decipher.

pretty sure everyone on the planet, bar you knows thats silly talk

look at the rooney cut-back in the video i posted, how is it different from what torres did? look at torres hands in the gif gesturing to his teammate that he should have reacted to the cutback!

i missed your take on this fact

that's a stüpid way of looking at it - 75% of demba ba's goals in chelsea were against southampton(a relegation-bound team). that's all is there to say about chelsea's greatest messiah in the striking department. he has only 2 goals and 0 assists in the league since january. he is a bigger flop than torres considering the hype surrounding his acquisition.

if chelsea sign falcao, he would struggle to score 12 league goals in england!

omar22: Nigerians are not mature enough to handle a little flesh been shown in public....

which is quite pathetic.......the so called giants of africa are whining because of a dress. genevieve wore the perfect dress - this is actually the first time she has impressed me on the red carpet unlike the other times where she looked like she was mourning a loved one in some boring black dress.

I dont see anything wrong with what she wore............ Ladies have wore similar outfit to the Oscar or Grammy for years and we dont see looneys shouting that they have joined Illuminati

nigerians are hypocrites!
don't take what they say religiously - you would think the country is filled with morally-upright people but what they do behind the scenes is much worse than the westerners they condemn! a nation of armed robbers, daring pröstitutes, kidnappers, corrupt politicians and ritualists and yet they find a dress on the red carpet immoral? i can't work this out in my head!

montelik: Cech got caught in no mans land for Chicha's first goal, but nobody will question his status despite the fact that he has made mistakes and concedes the occasional soft goal like every other goalie. But it doesn't matter, after all we all know DDG is the only goalie in the league who isn't perfect.

I am tired of the silly way DDG is looked at compared to other goalies.

petr cech?
don't let starboard and mr t-a punch you! cech to them is the greatest goalie in the league. if that chicharito goal that caught cech in a no man's land happened to us, these guys would have sent a killer squad to finish de gea off. rafa benitez jogged to the pitch last night to pat de gea in the back after the game in full respect!

https://i.minus.com/ibxJmlqMaJk2pB.gif

de gea is the best goalkeeper in this division by a country mile - it's not even close, it's not even an opinion anymore, it's a fact! that save from mata at the death was just top drawer. mata couldn't believe he missed! we just don't defend well with evra and we don't play high-line because of our slow defenders.

https://i.minus.com/iQtiudIvvnv08.gif

ashley young and anderson would give us a boost in the replay! these are the high-energy players that can destroy chelsea. anderson completely murdered chelsea in the carling cup tie before chelsea were aided by a dodgy penalty! we would need him again to finish the job.

BluIvy: 1000 000 + likes. Thank you Sir!
Please inform daddy Coogar!

daddy coogar my white bütt

gistyinka: Various celebrity attend yesterday for Africa Magic Viewers Choice Awards which was held at Eko and Suites hotel in Lagos, Nigeria. Several celebrity from African and Nigeria rock the red carpet yesterday at Africa Magic Viewers Choice Awards.

Former Big Brother Winner, Karen Igho and nollyhood actress Genevieve Nnaji was voted as Worst Dressed Celebrities among other celebrity with decent dress yesterday.

The duo of them show their fans V- dresses that exposed their breasts.

What is your take about the indecent dress among Nigeria celebrity and Nigeria ladies...

http://www.gistyinka.com/2013/03/worst-celebrity-dress-at-africa-magic.html

you must come from a village!
genevieve's dress was absolutely perfect - what's wrong with it and what exactly did she show that is getting your knickers in a twist? it's an award night, that is the way ladies are meant to kill it. what were you expecting? you want her to wear raincoat?

ibime has said nothing, he's just putting gloss over a sack of shyte!

fact remains the demba ba in the blue-short is a shadow of the one @ newcastle unless you function on a single-digit IQ. it has nothing to do with the manager, the system is the problem. benitez hasn't shackled demba or juan mata - the fact remains no system chelsea play favours their lead strikers. had torres started today, ibime would blame his lack of goals - not benitez's defensive tactics! what was defensive in what benitez did tonight? how come ba didn't score?

when torres does not score, he makes assists - he gets involved! ba on the other hand is useless once his name is not on the scoresheet! you can never remember ba's contribution in any game he doesn't score! he just runs around like he's intelligent whereas he's got nothing going for him other than hype. lukaku is a better striker than demba ba. torres is better than the 2 of them!

BluIvy: You speak like men are like kept pets who dont have a mind of their own. They are lured, they are stupiiid, they have no control or do not know right from wrong, cannot think for themselves that brains that God put in their skulls were a waste. I magine and you go around saying a man is the head of a home. No wonder the world is mass.

it's all about trust - as at the time eve was listening to the serpent, the only other human being on the planet was her partner(adam). where did she get the chutzpah to listen to a slithering creepy animal? why didn't the serpent lure the man instead? animals(including the serpent) and adam had been living in that garden before the woman was created, no?

nateevs: No one's actually answered how we've manged to turn a striker who had 14 EPL goals before joining Chelsea into one who care barely get a shot on target.

why are you asking this question? torres is the reason, of course! he's tied demba ba's fortunes and threw the jazz in the pacific ocean!

El Guapo: [color=#0066ff]Lol - What makes u think u play the Swansea Play?

This is United, where the potential threats are engineered from the Wings, once shutted down-only heaven can mutate those in the Middle into Precarious figures!

No Clattenburg show this time around and that places me on a Idyllic state.

Hope u contain the Mazacar in an applauding fashion at SW6 - U'd need a certain Busquet though! [/color]

we play better than swansea!
you are not going to do this to united 2 times in a row.....we absolutely murdered chelsea in the first half then became complacent/fatigued in the 2nd half - things like these can happen.

just relax - hold on for the 2nd leg! swansea ain't the only team that has stunned chelsea at the bridge. qpr did the same with their inferior team. chelsea would have all the possession as usual, united would do all the scoring!

another chicharito goal at the bridge is sure - williamhill, here i come!

Cristalz: Nope. Valencia 55%, Rooney 45%.

Rooney was just as guilty as Valencia for losing possession too easily.

at least rooney was at the thick of things where he's expected to lose possession because of the close marking - valencia was losing it in his own half! ordinary 1-2 combination with rafael, he couldn't muster it!

rooney and tom cleverley also gave up possession easily - but not as frequent as valencia even when he's not under pressure. when is the replay? i just hope nani isn't hamstrung cos then it means more valencia horrorcore!

El Guapo: [color=#0066ff]Well, Coogar how does it feel coming to Ur turf and giving u Ecstasy football? Your fans would certainly be happy that the Match day ticket was worth it.

In 3 Words "You are Out" - And plzzz dont Jxt take it personal [/color]

if swansea can piss all over your blue shirts, united would do the same! we have won at the bridge before, it took the help of a referee to beat our youngsters in the carling cup earlier in the season.........you would get ripped again in the replay!

Ibime: Same as we saw at The Bridge, MaZaCar buzzing around behind the striker is difficult for Utd midfield to pick up.

they are not difficult to pick - they did nothing in the first half. fatigue was responsible for carrick and cleverley gassing out. they played on tuesday - the last 35 mins was in a 10-man team.

Carrick will always be a questionable DM in ma eyes although some dudes love blaming Giggs who at the age of 40 has more energy and mobility than a younger Carrick who is always late to everything. . . like Modrics shot on Wednesday.

yet it was carrick that destroyed your midfield throughout the first half making interceptions and playing the pass of the season to chicharito! you are lucky nani came off and his replacement was chelsea's 12th player.

montelik: We are running out of energy in the center similar to last season and we are going to need our wing play to pick up. Carrick and Tom C have done well up till now, but they are beginning to show signs of fatigue.

those two didnt even do much wrong - chelsea countered and scored each time because of the way the attack kept surrendering the ball in the final third. valencia was responsible for at least 70% of those chelsea attacks.

chamotex: Nothing to worry about?
We lost a two goal lead in 45 minutes at OT and you say theres nothing to worry about.

who do you blame for that? look at the game immediately valencia came on - it just went to bits. there was no outlet on the flanks - valencia lost possession virtually each of the time he had the ball. his crosses were off and his passes were horrible!

Did you see the equaliser? How can we get caught and exposed like that whilst leading.
Chelsea had like a 5 to 3 man advantage. It was piss poor.

how did we lose the ball? we lost it, chelsea countered with speed and it was ramirez alone with evans! it was a well-worked team goal! this is chelsea we are talking about not wigan! we would do them at the bridge, i am quite confident of that, we don't do things the easy way.

atiku07: @coogar
What's with u and the fool called torres, abi the guy dey give u cuts from his weekly wages ni. Seriously just stop defeding wat is not torres is poor on the pitch forget his past performances.Moreover all this words u invented in defending underperforming torres time for u to keep dem in ur dictionary abeg. mtcheewwww

how's demba ba fared as replacement? he fired blanks again today until MAZACAR came to chelsea's rescue. what is to blame? the strikers or the system itself?

then again, if there's any doubt that lampard should leave chelsea, today's game is a reminder that lampard hampers chelsea's attacking might! what a difference mikel made when he came on!!!

chamotex: First half (Nani) second half (Valencia). The difference was clear. Nuff said.

Rooney apart from the goal did zilch.

our attack broke down with valencia(every single time), he musta given the ball away more than 20 times today. we have nothing to complain about - we can do chelsea at the bridge!

coded guy: If we go throught then its manchester city.

that was written in the stars - united must always play a premier league side in the fa cup - it's united's birthright!

BluIvy: We all know the story about what went down in Eden. Adam blamed Eve instead of having guts to stand for what is right or face the music. How old are you? I guess age has no effect it gender based.

how did adam blame eve? if eve wasn't such a conniving bïtch, why did she lure her husband into taking the forbidden fruit? adam trusted his partner, eve trusted a serpent!

two things happened in this game that swung the balance - nani's injury that brought on valencia(the plank) and lampard off for ramirez. mikel obi just did what he knows how to do best by sitting in front of his defence and allowing ramirez to run us ragged in the final third.

valencia should be sold after this game - he did nothing! carrick, cleverley went out of gas after the first hour, fatigue should be blamed for that anyways. we can beat chelsea at the bridge!

hahahahaha - we are drawing man city if we beat chelsea.....this is absolutely hilarious! when are we ever going to play a non-premier league side in this competition? it's going to be a cracker - we should pick ourselves up and win the replay!

denzel2009: I'm sure coogar is joking...how can you call that a cutback?

superb cutback!

lalaboi: This muchacho coogar has lost all rep on here because of torress . . . A cutback!!! ? Jesu Christi!

shut up, lalaboi.
your opinion on football matters are nothing to write home about!

ileobatojo: In response to a discussion about single women going after married men.

https://www.nairaland.com/1202715/when-desirable-not-available

On this thread.

Clearly, 'I have a problem with logic'

you sure have a problem with logic - why should a woman go after a married woman when she's going to moan about it later? you have 2 choices here - go after a married man and deal with the consequences that come with it - i don't want to hear any moans about how men are evil or what not.

2nd option is don't go after married men, do everything possible within your means to stop others going for them! destroy such relationships! what you cannot do however, is to eat your cake and have it! in the other thread, i simply encouraged women to go for it if it keeps them happy. "being happy" is the operative word unlike the op who wants to blame men for what women are happy doing!

-------------De Gea----------
--Rafael--Rio--Evans--Evra-
------Carrick----Cleverley------
--Nani----Rooney----Kagawa-
---------Chicharito---------

very strong team, chelsea should die naturally with this selection!

biolabee: coogar, not all marital affairs involve full disclosure
SOme ladies are deceived

deceived or pretending to have been deceived.....
siddon there - if a young woman gets deceived by a 55-year old looking man, who is to blame? she shouldn't have done her homework to find out about this old man? she should just take his words as the gospel truth and go with the flow? these women know or at least suspect the men are married - but the perks and the niceties are too abundant to be overlooked so they feign ignorance!

ileobatojo: By the way, which side are you on again? On one thread, you are championing single women going for married men if that's what makes them happy. On this one, you are calling the women that do so all manners of names. Mr flip flopper.

you have a problem with logic......
women should not complain about being cheated on - they are the cause of their own problems. men cheat on women with women. think about it, if there's a united front amongst women to resist all married men, then infidelity would reduce to the barest minimum.

what has the other thread gotta do with this? are the men complaining? if a single woman seeks a married man and they are happy, who am i to say no to their arrangement? am i complaining? is the man involved complaining? apples and oranges, mate! i don't give a flying fück how any woman wants to live her life - eating their cake and still trying to keep some in their bras is what irks me.

Mkpakala: I don't have problem with an unmarried men sleeping around, but the truth is a married man has a vow to protect and also an obligation to protect her wife emotionally or otherwise then why will he go ahead to cheat? knowing quite well the act will cause emotional trauma to the other spouse.The question is will the society judge them the same? if it were to be the other way round way the answer is NO then the society needs to protect the other spouse.

why he went ahead to cheat is irrelevant - did he cheat with himself?

there was a willing partner out there who should know better - a woman! this woman knows a fellow woman is the wife of this man and she shouldn't have accepted such a devious offer but she still went ahead. women are their own worst enemies! all those aristo men in the nigerian universities, are you trying to tell me the chics don't know these men are married? if every woman says no to married men, would there be infidelity? if there's no market, there wouldn't be men leaving their house to commit adultery in the first place. when women close these markets, there wouldn't be buyers!!!

ileobatojo: I know this comes as no shock to you but guess who else can say no? The married men! Being pursued vehemently by hot, single skanks? Just say no. The hot secretary in your office flirting with you? Just say no. The multitudes of women you go after yourself without invitation nko? Just say no. How about the ones you lie to that you are single? Just say no!

oh please - lied to that men are single? women must be complete idiöts then that they are being lied to. surely, monica lewinsky forgot bill clinton was married when she polished his knob in the oval office! women are their own worst enemies - some of them take pride in sleeping with the other people's husband - they see it as dominance or whatever nonsense that creeps on their minds! men are designed to be predators and they would always do the chasing - if a woman falls for their wiles, she has herself to blame!

If the man says no to a woman's sexual advances and refrains from making any sexual advances to other women, the issue is dead and buried, but do they?

hahahahaha - shouldn't women have each other's back? why should a woman even go after a married man in the first place? women initiate the moves and yet they are the ones to cry foul after being slaughtered and used like a sanitary towel - women can't have it both ways!

Both parties are at fault (as long as their is no deception involved). As far as I'm concerned though, the fault lies more with the person disrespecting the marital vows. Male or female!

women are at fault - men are faultless here unless räpe is involved!
if women learn to close their legs when married men are on the prowl, no one would get hurt. the last line of defence lies with the woman. she's the only determinant to whether she would have sex or not. it's never in a man's hand!

ileobatojo: Interesting! So these single fraudulent feminist females are r*aping all these married men who have sacred vows to protect innit?

no one is råping the other. rãpe cases aside, a woman holds the key to any sëxual congress. if she says no, then it's no regardless of the kind of mouth-watering promises the man must have made. if women say no then the issue is dead n buried but do they?

biolabee: Can musilims in the UK actually marry more than one wife

bigamy is a statutory offence in the uk.
however, a muslim can go to his native country, marry as many woes as possible and bring all of them to the uk and live happily ever after. i think the multiple wives can even claim benefits sef if they wish to. so there are men with multiple wives in the uk.

kulyie: exactly.so this campaign you are starting will not yield anything.i remember some years back when i used to go to national council of women societies (ncws) for my msc research,i discovered that these women that claim to be fighting for women's right,gender equality,fightig for oppressed and abused women in marriage are actually their own enemies.even though i am not their member but for the purpose of my thesis i used to go there to jot down some information and elicit data.these women will gossip about each other,slander themselves,secretly date each other's husband and so many sick things.the real founders of feminism and women empowerment will be ashamed and disappointed if they go there and see all the atrocities these women do to themselves.apart from getting my masters degree,i later discovered that these women are just going there for show off,getting connected to the governor or ministers wife who may be appointed as their chairman so they can get contracts.some of them even secretly sleep with these governors so that they can get bigger contracts and oppress themselves with the latest gold necklace,voile or swiss lace,brazillian hair and car,so will you blame the men when women themselves are strengthening adultery and polygamy because of materialism

i am not surprised - feminism has always being a fraud!
the women championing it cannot even tell you categorically what it means - they want sex equality. one moment women are weak, the next moment - women are equal or even greater than men. yet, when these female freedom fighters gather together, all they do is slander, gossip and hurt each other.

biolabee: 200 years ago, did this cheating as you call it exist
The man is doing what his ancestors did legally within polygamy only that he has NOT adjusted himself to modern realities.

modern realities? are you aware the holy quaran actually supports polygamy? you mean people would abandon their long-held traditions because of political-correctness? the same political correctness that says "aye" to gay marriage and frowns at polygamy? they would have to stop nigerians practising islam first - not possible!

Women should wait for another 40 years when naija men will be cleaned out for cheating on their legally married wives

women can wait 4000 yrs and nothing would change!
an alhaji knows he can marry 2 or more wives - his religion backs the practise and logic states he must have cheated on the first wife before bringing in the second and third wives home.

this is absolute nonsense.....

you cannot force people to live the way they don't want to live - women still carry the majority of the blame. it's not like these women don't know the man in question is married, why then do they still sleëp with the men? were the women forced to? were they råped?

women should take a hard look at themselves and stop blaming the men for their own irresponsibility. if an irresponsible married man asks a woman out, she should refuse his advances. pure, plain and simple!!!