₦airaland Forum

Does that mean logicboy can finally get hitched to simonAndal?

^^^true beretta..i got a friend who will rather flex at his gf's than read..keeps saying "this is my year of favour"..i laugh in my mind and say yeah,right..it might turn out to be your year of weeping if you dont study...good point.

^^true bro,i dislike the way tbj fans make a religion out of emanueltv...personally when my family puts that stuff on i go into my room to study...
I wonder how clueless his fans are...
All manner of weird theories like..
*demons cause low iq..heck,why are many freethinkers(the supposedly most "demonized" of all) intellectually superb..
*demons cause marital ill luck...really?many unmarried women have bad behavioural patterns not demons of family covenants..and they believe they need deliverance if their business is not booming..thats not the cause of demons that is the cause of no innovation/poor strategising..
So many instances..smh..

In your shoes too op..i believe in the existence of forces bordering on the negative spectrum of the other dimension
#hears snickers "yeah right,pokemon and all his friends.." but some of the stuffs i've seen seem creepy..i was watching when i heard a woman say last years flood was caused by their society and i was like,seriously?arent floods caused by bad dredging,unusual levels of rainfall etc..naturally,as a researcher,i am of the opinion there must be something up there..still checking maybe some form of regressive hypnosis or maybe its for real after all..

plaetton: Agreed.
But Religion is very fearful. Don't you agree?
Religion is also all about fear. Fear is the principal currency.
From fear you get, hate, bigotry, exploitation, etc, etc.
Just look at the havoc it wrecks on the human psyche.
Just look at the havoc it wrecks on the Nigerian society.

I hold religion responsible for every problem we have in Nigeria. Yes, religion.

Really?,now thats a new one..please let us not argue based on sentimentalism and emotion.please state the merits and demerits of religion and also the merits and demerits of irreligion..
I will agree 100percent with you if you prove that irreligion will lead to world peace,eradicate tribalism and racism..
Thanks..

Logicboy03:

You mean you are tired of slandering Dawkins?

Lol..you are one funny dude..why slander someone that shot himself in the foot!

Logicboy03: What was Dawkins gaffe? Please tell me?

Can't you find something to do,i am tired of educating you already!!

You accuse me of lying when clearly you utilize dodgy means of debating..ok "guardian of truth" from the video it was clear that darwin was referring to panspermia..and they said only religionists practice hero worship..smh..you are so bent on defending your latest favorite idol dawkins even when his gaffes are glaringly obvious!..you are a scam and a plonker!

Funny but lenin had the same goals ..you are just to much of a sissy to carry out his methods..
But with ideals like this you are pretty dangerous..just dont get into power!

Logicboy03:

We ban dangerous substances like cocaine that destroys the minds of people. Your religion is a class A drug that should be banned from govt/law (separation of church and state) . You have the freedom to worship but not to interfere with your religious nonsense in the law of a secular democratic country.


Havent you been complaining about atheists and their removal of god from the public? Mr Secure Faith?




Christians here have created threads with false anti-evolution narratives to hate on evolution. You should stop lying.







If christians were secure in faith, they wouldnt leave their religion. We would have emptying churches and decreasing attendance.




I dont fight your god. Your god doesnt exist (too much of a paradox). I write for some few hours a day about the fools that do nonsense in god's non-existent name

^^^Hello,stalin!

Summary of logicboys posts on this thread so far...
Posts surface about the shakiness of dawkins logic..logicboy to the rescue of his champion..would probably have adopted panspermia as model for the origin7 of life..saw how ridiculous that theory was then switched to name calling and invectives..has nothing more to post then carries out his "ultimate jutsu" of handing out anonyism tags..

Logicboy03: Anonyism 101-


Make claims and then expect the opponent to provide proof for your claims.



Goodnite everyone

Thanks for enjoying the show!

This is the dumbest post i have seen this week..so much for logic!..

On second thoughts,let logic boy keep playing color-blind and keep waiting for us to present evidence when enigma and myself have already done that countless times...

What more evidence do you need..and stop practicing your self acclaimed trademark of slapping "anonyism" tags on people because you are quite guilty of that now

Logicboy,and because you are slower on the uptake,fyi that "person" is you!

^^I wonder o!What part of that does he not understand?

This logicboy dude is such a terrier!so persistent..i hope you get that award you missed last year..

Logicboy03: Take note of the bold and then go and read the panspermia hypothesis.












See how stoopid some people are? Everyone can see how Dawkins was talking about a different origin of life than panspermia.

Now i know you are into dubious means of debating..
In your unbolded,it said life must have evolved elsewhere in the universe then by some means,probably his alien bullshit came to earth..notice the 'universe' not "earth"..
So are you suggesting life evolved on earth and came to earth..if so going by your bolded,you are a semi-cretinous rétàrd!!qed

Dawkins did not mention panspermia but he did imply it !here:

"It could be that at some earlier time somewhere in the universe a civilization evolved by probably some kind of Darwinian means to a very very high level of technology and designed a form of life that they seeded onto perhaps this planet."

If this aint panspermia i don't know what it is..come and defend your pope logicboy!

Logicboy03: See the fool? You now admit that dawkins never mentioned panspermia in the interview.






No scientist will tell you that panspermia is a fact.

Breathe..then read my statement again,especially the part where I stated the reason Dawkins did not mention panspermia..
And by the way ,you can go read your "alien civilization where the gods of primitive people bullcrap" now..
You are too emotional,damn,you would have made a good fundamentalist!

Where are the lies?i cant see any!

Logicboy,your above comments passes a lot of information about your iq levels..
Dawkins never mentioned panspermia for the fear of being ridiculed in the scientific community but you were sticking up for it almost as if it were fact..
that pisses me off!

^^what is stupid?hear yourself logicboy..here are possible scenarios for the origin of life according to panspermia..

1.Life began once, on Mars, and came to Earth in Martian meteorites. May or may not still exist on Mars (amino acids or bacteria)

2.
Life originated on both Earth and Mars independently. Cross-colonization (cross-fertilization) may subsequently have occurred (a.a. or bacteria)

3.
Life began once, on Earth, and was propagated to Mars, where it possibly established itself (a.a. or bacteria)

4.
Life originated on both Earth and Mars, but in spite of the exchange of rocks and dust, no transfer of viable organisms has occurred

5.
Life originated on neither Earth nor Mars, but somewhere else entirely, such as a comet, Jupiter’s moon Europa, Venus, or body outside the Solar System altogether. It came to earth, perhaps Mars too, via some sort of Panspermia mechanism (a.a or bacteria)

6.
Life has originated on earth alone and has not (yet) successfully colonized another planet. Mars is, and always was, lifeless
http://leiwenwu.tripod.com/panspermia.htm

Apparently the originators of the panspermia theory got confused..so next time before you get all worked up and post insupportable stupidity...think!!

^^ you don't strike me as an intelligent person..how can you support such stupidity in a debate?smh for you..

Logicboy03: How foolish. Dawkins clearly states that it is a possibility not a fact. You have nothing and now, you are trying to put words into Dawkins mouth as if he said it was a fact?

You have lost the argument. Go home and be a family man.

yeah,right i believe in panspermia being able to seed earth with life just the way i believe that aliens on mars are seeding torrents on piratebay..panspermia is essentially a "pink unicorn" theory... Panspermia is bs,deal with it...smh

Donmichaelz: Kids of now adays watch (Porn) movies' wat is naruto.mstw

Lets see...watch cartoons and get my fill of laughs or jerk off to some pørñ....watch cartoons wins hands off!..seriously pørñ is for $exuälly frustrated/curios folks...

I love me some manga!!Naruto rocks cos its filled with anatomically correct descriptions of moves and corresponding reactions..its funny too and the underlying theme is about bonds and friendship..whats not to like..op free yourself and stop being a stature-like kill joy!

That niqqa got em batchez suckin "holy" jizz..damn..
Farkin fraud!!

Hey man,your syntax is invalid cos elif=="2" is wrong.it is elif variable==2:
#give four spaces then do stuff

Good one shafay..i wish we could have more of these in nigeria..too bad..poor exposure is eating us alive..i remember as a 14 year old writing html pages with javascript using just a j2me phone in school..we'd do wonders with proper enablement..i remember,the article abt 4th graders in schools in the uk receiving raspberry pi's for coding python..here we'd rather have a blackberry.smh

Nice dissertation..but as i wrote previously i thought it was a religious thing but i realise that it has to do with hero and hero worship...i stay in the north and the same adulation is given to sheikh gumi(at said time of writing this ,i am 5 minutes away from his mosque)..it is very similar to the "man of God" thing ,christians do.imagine,stickers of sheikh gumi(deceased) are on almost every muslim owned bus...so i think its a hero/hero worship thing..#i could be wrong..

maclatunji: Calling is quite a vague term, really difficult to define.






Your answers are insightful, my major motivation for asking these questions is that I do interact with or observe Christian clergy sometimes and there seems to be the sense of "entitlement", that once there is a religious title like Pastor, Reverend, Apostle and so on attached to their name,
the other party should drop all rational thought and simply oblige them of whatever they request.

Sometimes, I see other Christians do this (oblige them) and I am like- "did you drop your brain somewhere or is it magic?'.

Whoever you are, it does seem wrong to me to expect people to waive due process for you. Following the due process would be the Godly way and not vice versa.

Hmmn..at bolded,it is a religious thing,same could be said of you when its your religion..