₦airaland Forum

hopefulLandlord:
Hence the answer he gave you previously

Which god? OBATALA?

Hehe hardmirror had gotten the question and had provided a good answer which I wanted Christians to see.
I believe your earlier answer influenced him to ask me which god

JackBizzle:
Reyginus, dblackninja, hahn, johnydon22, et al

I will be creating a thread to destroy Kingebukasblog's lies about religion and atheism........

It's going to be interesting.

To tell you the truth, it gonna be a waste of time... But you can still create though. If you even ask me, I'll say he knows the truth, he's just trolling because he's not yet ready to accept them.

HardMirror:
Ok

Using herbs is an application of common sense. Saying God provided the herbs is just being religious. It in no way makes the herbs effective and you not thanking God does not make the herbs ineffective.

Anyone can claim any of the thousands of gods provided the herbs. So I see no relevance of a supposed God here.

Insightful..Now you have arrived. More grease to your armpit

HardMirror:
What question?
You said "the christian God" and I replied ok

This was and is the question:

Aaah okay.
Do you think you are close to achieving your aim? Because a Christian can say that God himself provided medicines to cure our sicknesses... so it's only right (for a man with a common sense) to pray, apply the medicines and thank God for healing you through the herbs/medicines.

Is that scenario a real application of common sense?
If yes why? If no why??

HardMirror:
Ok

Is the question not safe enough for you my brother?
You're already failing in your quest

hopefulLandlord:
Now you know how much sense it makes to us

Why don't that god intervene in places science cannot reach at present? Sudan? Ethiopia?

But Yahweh followers give him the credit where he is in fact not needed

No my brother you're deviating sooo much from the question..this doesn't really help hardmirror in his quest ..We all know what the term "God" means to christans...except if you can some how truly make them know that what they are worshipping isn't real..

HardMirror:
Which God? Obatala?

Oh the Christian God.

hopefulLandlord:
Replace God with Batman in your post and it still makes same sense

No it doesn't make sense to a Christian..for batman is a servant or an aide to an officer..
Or the comic character we all know.

HardMirror:
There is nothing like atheist pastor.
What ever I do now is aimed to bring people to terms with reality and it helps in many ways.
If you are bitten by a poisonous snake would you seek medical help or prayers?
Same should apply to every part of our lives. Using our common sense

Aaah okay.
Do you think you are close to achieving your aim? Because a Christian can say that God himself provided medicines to cure our sicknesses... so it's only right (for a man with a common sense) to pray, apply the medicines and thank God for healing you through the herbs/medicines.

Is that scenario a real application of common sense?
If yes why? If no why??

@Hardmirror, are you now an atheist "pastor" ?
And how can your sermon help the Christians??

Goddys:
He killeth and maketh alive. He is compassionate but a consuming fire! From heaven He sent His word and it accomplishes its purpose on earth. From nothingness, He brings everything into existence. He sent His angel and thousands of His enemies were slaughtered in a night. He is the only One that has power over spirit,body and souls of everything in existence. The air, storm, seas, sands, trees, walls, mountains, animals hear His voice and quake. He is the creator of Satan, Eartum, Otemanudo, Enki and all entities. His name is Yahweh, Yeshua, Jehovah.....FEAR HIM

Yeah he did all those in that fable.
@ The bolded we're still waiting for him (over centuries now) to swat one houseful
If he's that mighty let him stop me from saying that he is omni-impotent & I said it..#My bad.

otemanuduno:
2 DAYS LEFT FOR ME TO START BEGGING FOR BREAD, ACCORDING TO THE PROPHECY OF Yahweh, the god of muafrika2 and joagbaje.

yahweh is in trouble if this prophecy of yahweh by Goddys his inspired man does not come to pass.
But thus says EARTUM, THE god WHO LIKES THE USE OF THE BRAIN, YOU SHALL PAY YOUR MONTHLY TITHE AND ALSO paste recharge cards online to show the supremacy of EARTUM over yahweh in the matter of wisdom and PROPHECY. And this event also shall be recorded in the DOCTUFOS. SO SHALL IT BE!!!

Hahaha Otem and DOCTUFOS.
Well believe me that those people you quoted will be here on 6th to participate in the recharge card galore They know their god can't even kill a fly

johnydon22:
I wont.. I go finish my story

Cool

johnydon22:
So many things taking my time brother but i'm sure i'll find time to deliver more

Oh okay take your time bro, so that the story won't suffer because of being apprehensive of time. But don't do what mosquito/musketoo did oooh.

Farmerforlife:
Google scientologist. It is different from scientist. It has so often been drummed into my ears that atheists only believe logical premise based on scientifically sound evidence that I assumed all of you must have at least a passing knowledge of science and how it derives its evidence. I am now finding out that you guys believe in science based on blind faith alone. You really know nothing of science, except what your white atheist evangelists have told you. Yet you deride others for their blind faith.

See delusion at its peak! Anyway am tired of this topic already

johnydon22:
Hahaha episode 12 coming in soon too

Seems too soon is now becoming toooooo soon

Richirich713:
Yes he's the greatest being possible, the most High.

No it's the ganger man over here. The one I buy weed from. He is always at the most High state

The one you're probably talking about is the confused one that loves incest so much to the point of hating it. Very confused being I think

Richirich713:
continue to thank the most High.

Yeah I will But do you know who the most High is??

[size=3pt] something is wrong. [/size]

Oh Seun has released incest from prison. I thank the most High that Richirich713 concluded his checks before that, if not...I would have been slaughtered like a chicken by now.
Anyway hope we are good Richirich713

Richirich713:
Incest , lol just checking

So what did you find out about your checks??

Atheists should just answer the question not bring the bible in, nor should they keep saying "it might lead to this or that".

You forgot the question explicitly mentioned "Nairaland atheists " and not Nairalanders or any other thing, so what do you think?? Also know that bringing in the bible by atheists to answer a question is just to show the absurdities in that fable, nothing more.

I believe if I just answer the question by just saying YES OR NO, you will ask me to elucidate further by stating my reasons. Then giving my reasons might lead to this and that or whatever my opinion is.

Ps do me a favor stop with ur " lacking comprehension" comments, so far I have remain civil but might change my mind soon.

Oh sorry it was never meant as an insult. Just that I find it strange that something quite simple was being misconstrued to a heightened level of mockery.
I have never insulted anyone before, but might have a good hearty laugh when I found something or someone being funny.

Richirich713:
Here's what king asked:
Nearly every atheist response ignore the "just for pleasure and not for procreation" part, most atheists responses focused on inbreeding and the bible, that I think is bad answers.

The first person to answer that's JackBizzle made a reference to the bible first because he knew what the person asking the question subscribes to.
Then he answered the question outrightly by saying "No sensible person will support Inbreeding [In.cest] (Nl spam bot changed it to inbreeding).. Then went on to say what an in.cest could lead to -- not minding whether the in.cest is done for purpose (breeding) or not.

Johnydon22 gave a very lucid answer. First on a comment and later on the matter at hand. You can refer back to his post..also keep in mind the change of words by spam bot.

ValentineMary also answered by saying: "We can't really say if it is bad or good." Then further buttressed his point.

And so on and so forth.
Hope I have helped you guys. Even if dropping a belief in a God is hard, comprehension is not that hard.

Richirich713:
hw am I lacking comprehension?

If you go back right from the first page, you will see that everyone answered a question based on what was asked or a comment. Why do you now claim the answers bad if you really comprehended what they wrote? What is bad about the answers? And don't let me believe that you also equate atheists to scientologists like my farmerforlife

Richirich713:
hahahaha don't get angry at me and king cuz most atheists here are giving bad answers.

Another person lacking comprehension

malvisguy212:
to multipy the earth. They were created without genetic defect. Because their children would've been genetically cripple.

Ah to multiply the earth. And how could they have achieved the command? Inbreeding or...
Because for them to truly multiply, they have to bear children and their children and so on also have to continue with that line (which is even absurd because the bible contradicted by telling us another thing..but let continue with that line).

If that is what the command " to multiply" is all about, then did God actually sanctioned inbreeding

Thoniameek:
Well... If that's what you got from what I wrote up there - fine.

That's what I understand..... You can call God on his ignorance and also profess a better way for him to have gone about it.....

Oh if only god could beg to use a little of my omnisciency and omnipotency, he would have done a better job. He's claiming these two things in the bible but doesn't even know poo about what he is claiming

Logicbwoy:
LIES! For someone claiming moral superiority over atheists, you are such a liar-

here is what an atheist told you on page one about incest-

Oh don't sweat over kingebukasblog
He can never, and will never agree to anything said by any cognitive person.

malvisguy212:
All of this event happen before the law of inbreeding was given, According to the Apostle Paul, when there is no law, there can be no
violation of the law or sin.

Oh what does this command (law) imply then:
"Be fruitful and multiply"

Thoniameek:
[s] Atheist believe in science..... Scientifically it's not advisable. [/s]

There was a great family in the olden days that ruled Britain for 400 years but was put to an end as a result of inbreeding. They probably felt they had really good genes and didn't want to alter or mix it up by breeding outside their blood line.

They was a common disease among them (I wish when I read I hold names) a lot of them died at infancy - and that was a time when the rate of infant mortality was low. And the last few that ruled, ruled with diseases.

It is wrong I would say.... The effect may not be immediate but at a long run....

God allowed it because it was necessary at that time (as we know the effect(s) are not immediate), and disallowed it when it wasn't necessary anymore.

If inbreeding was a norm I don't think the world would be half as social as it is now - I mean we've enough of tribal war and racism to deal with already.

Nice my only problem is the bolded.
Are you indirectly saying that your omnipotent god is an ignorant being that don't know anything until he sees an effect from it? If the effect is bad, he will now tell his people to stop doing the command (for that is now a sin) and follow a new one?

Logicbwoy:
That's why you're a manure farmer for life.

You don't know $s.hit

I can't help but laugh so hard at this comment
Is it because the guy is a farmer for life?

And he knows $s.hit... used as manure

malvisguy212:
smh. Listen, if adam and eve were the first to start the chain and have EXISTED 7000 years ago, we would not see the genetic defect in their DNA we see today.

I don't even understand this, please rephrase..thanks.

God did not sanction it that time and God did not condemn it as of that time.

If God did not sanction and also did not condemn it, what did God do then?
Have you forgotten the lines "be fruitful and multiply" ??

Not until the genetic defect in their DNA are weak, then God command moses to numbers the isaelites, and He set a law condemning inbreeding.

O boy see confusion. Are you now saying that God allowed inbreeding before then saw that it causes a defect and gave a law against it

Farmerforlife:
I did, and I did not see any pertinent response. Please repost the rational explanations for me. The only feeble attempt was by Johnnydon22, and he spoke more about inbreeding (which had nothing to do with the question) than about in.cest (except to highlight his personal feeling, which to me, could be irrational , like all personal feelings). His citation of Igbo culture is also mistaken, in that it also depends heavily on the traditional religion and its religious taboos, which as an atheist, he clearly disbelieves in.

If there was any other explanation by any other person that I missed, please highlight it for me. Thank you in advance.

I see. The problem is lack of comprehension. A question was asked and all of them gave their opinions and also included a disastrous effect an in.cest could lead to.
What more do you need?
Are you equating atheist to scientologists??