₦airaland Forum

oxford: [s]maclatunji, I will take the pain to enlighten you, though your case is beyond redemption. arresting the mugu would have been playing into his hand, dignifying him, make him look like a hero been persecuted. the more strategic option is to ignore the jihadist, cut off his finance source and flush out his foot soldiers and boy! see the result of this strategy - amazing!

-one kaka is behind bars and the other qaqa is roasting in hell
-2 bamas are cooling their heels in torture camps.
-2 senators facing the wrath of the law
-hundreds of their sucide bombers have been eliminated in damaturu, maiduguri, yobe and postiskum.

Now what has all these translate to: the sect is on its knees, begging
- their conditions have changed-
*they dont want GEJ to accept islam any longer
*they dont want to islamize nigeria any longer
*They are now ready to disobey quaranic injunctions that barred them from negociating with 'infidels'

Now that is what is called SRATEGIC

[/s]

Complete Crap. Zero sense.
God Forbid, I wonder what ur position would have been if any of ur loved ones (if married - ur wife) was a casualty from the evil Boko suicide bombing. I hope ur position will remain.

The moment the world knew that Osama was behind 9-11, the hunt for him began. U are saying the govt knows Buhari's complicity and yet let him alone strategically. What a very useless and hopless govt then.

virtuoso01: Trust me, the cost is very negligible.
Just try and find out.

texazzpete: When the MEND criminals put forward Soyinka to negotiate on their behalf, none of you m0r0ns called Soyinka a terrorist.

Now when na Buhari, una wan craze. Rubbish.

oxford: GEJ not arresting him is only strategic. criminal offense is never over taken by time, so chill. Buhari respected by commoners where - kano voted against him/his party, don't tell me kaduna pls. maybe in daura - though yaradua showed him pepper even there.

Let me as your silly brain - Did syria rebels or government nominated kofi annan?

salt 1: The two scenarios are as different as light is from darkness. MEND is demanding for adequate compensation for being the hen that lays the golden egg. They can easily ask Soyinka who stands for justice to rep them. You know that Soyinka recently threw his weight behind Achebe's claim of a genocide to Igbos.They know that Soyinka will be just and fair.
Recall too that MEND had engaged govt in dialogue but were ignored until they insisted on Nigeria listening.
Now what is BH, a terrorist group, asking for? Why shd Buhari be here if they are not sure he supports their cause?
His name on this list is a confirmation of what we had always known. The only missing person is IBB

salt 1: You are wrong, maclatunji. Koffi Annan isn't Syrian so he is expected to be neutral. Buhari is Nigerian and has been accused of being their commander-in-chief. No right-thinking person will consider Buhari neutral. They should've left him out of this to save his ailing reputation. But obviously, they are proud of his role and wish to be further associated with him.
What precisely does BH want?

Demdem: Me think u are dumb.
MEND named wole soyinka among those to represent them during discussions with Yaradua. Does that suggest that Wole Soyinka is evil MEND sponsor?

Elebiju: u are a dyslexic,do u need anybody to tell u that buhari,ibb and the rest are the true boko haram

karl max: They actaully called BUHARI as one of their Negotiators is it not clear now that buhari and all those mentioned as negotiators are their sponsor.

dirifred: you are so obsessed with bad news that good news makes no sense. since you can prove they are meeting,are you the secretary in their meetings? how is the minutes you took during the last meeting?. well you are not alone, that's whats on the mind of majority of Nigerians.we must start believing in Nigeria. NIGERIA MUST MOVE FORWARD

234GT: No christmas, no rehabilitation of roads!

charleymed: laughing in yariwba, ACN dinning wt their waterloo, lolz

234GT: So she is a clean and honest politician?

caseless: dem, dont tell me the knowledge u have of ur religion is this half-baked. Religion cant b parallel when they answer to thesame name 'religion', the ettiquetes are what i consider as their difference. If ur way of life or belief is differnt from ours, it is becos ur religion was not left un-altered or un-adultrated by ur so called writers who never met, knew or ate with jesus christ. I'm waiting for the fourth God in the person of apostle paul. Who was he? U need to take ur time out and study muslims way of life before u jump into conclusion based on stereotypes...dont use actions of a few to judge the rest, cos if thats a proper thing to do the we'd hav judged christanity based on action of some churches where we have gays and lesbians as bishops and leaders repectively or based on actions of some now-a-days pastors. How do u justify the action of some of ur christain brothers in britain, us and isreal?

Jarus: Ok, let's settle for that.

I'm just thinking that it's too early, four weeks to debate, and we may have better topic before the one-week-to-debate deadline.

stuhporh: Am with you a 100% but dont forget that all what is in the QURAN is what we have as the OLD Testament, while Jesu himself did say he didnt come to remove , but to add to what has been in existence. What am trying to say is we both have the believe in same GOD, but, That same GOD has chose to channel to himself through Our Lord JESUS Christ. Now the Muslims were the conventional moses followers who lived by the law, but refuses to accept the grace (JESUS)we are enjoying. try read up a story about a man in ACT CHAPTER 11. whom was not a believer but very close to GOD giving alms and even pray, ( i say that ma was a MUSLIM) one day God showed himself to him and showed to peter aswell, directed peter to his house and converted him to a Christ follower. That chapter tells me a true Muslim serving GOD with their hearts and no prejudice, will be converted at the last minute no matter what. Also not forgetting that the bible also made reference that those that we think cant make heaven will actually do nd vis-a-vis.
[so our GOD is no confusionist, however, whatever he does no matter the consequences, he remains unquestionable

caseless: since ur belief is concerntric to the difference in GOD we worship, why not give me proof to back ur position like i'v done pointing out the polytheistic nature of ur God as a way of differentiating our God from urs.

shdemidemi: a simple explanation of 3 in 1 is how God has related with humans.In the beginning God spoke with humans and appeared to them, i call that 1st dispensation, in the second dispensation, God related with humans through Jesus Christ and in the 3rd dispensation in which we are right now,he speaks through d holy spirit.

caseless: u must define ur God in order to make it easy for him(op) to answer ur question properly. Like i've jst pointed out, our GOD is one, but urs i 3....d diff is clear.

stuhporh: @demdem; such a funny post, thank GOD i have read the QURAN well enough even as i am a christian. even prophet Muhammed acknowledges JESUS CHRIST, but that isnt the question. We worship same GOD, we have a mix up coz GOD wants it so. I hope you remember the story of abraham and the son the slave had for him and GODS reaction to it. so when muslims say they are slaves, i understand, But when christians refuse to say the same, it is not to say we are above you in the sight of GOD, it is to show that we acknowledge the love of GOD for humans. and that love is greater than a fatherly love.