₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: Register • Login • With Google • Trending • Recent • New

Stats: 3,345,374 members, 8,517,070 topics. Date: Wednesday, 11 November 2026 at 06:04 PM

Toggle theme

Demdem's Posts

Nairaland Forum › Demdem's Profile › Demdem's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 (of 646 pages)

Politics › Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by Demdem(m): 12:11pm On Jul 05, 2012
thegoodjoehunt:
I have stressed the fact that there is a reason why the arrest was not made. FARCROOK is not the only target. If you think this is just about FARCROOK then you are mistaking. Ask yourself this question.

If FARCROOK was arrested on the spot, will any other person involved be discovered? If no, then the way is to mark the money and try to trace the money trail. Just like when a Kidnap is done in most developed countries, you let the marked ransom be paid. Later when you trace even a note to someone, you can back trail the movement of the money.

You guys please stop saying all this FARCROOK should have been arrested on the spot. That would have been too stupid.
Good comments but i have more questions?
Who other person except Farook and the NASS guy has so far been accused with handling the money?
Since the money is allegedly marked why has the the trail gone cold to the extent that they are even begging farook to surrender the money. Doesnt this sugest to u that probably there was no string operation initially and Otedollar never informed SSS at the beginning
Politics › Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by Demdem(m): 12:05pm On Jul 05, 2012
jigawatts: Well, as a smart Nigerian, I think Otedollar decided to hold copies of d recordings to himself so dat SSS won't try any rubbish at late hour.... U know SSS can decide not to make d recordings public, BUT by keeping copies, It will be hard for SSS to turn d table around to protect Farouk Lawan ...... If dats d case, then once again ..... Otedollar outsmarted dem all ..... I mite be wrong tho
i doubt this also my bro. if truly is a string operation by SSS, gadgets used and recordings are owned by the SSS. Why should a private individual demand copies? is this how its being done? is that the normal standard practice? if he doesnt trust the SSS in the first place then why calling them to rescue him from farook's alleged blackmail. Why does he just go ahead and make the copies himsef without involving the SSS? he could have done that and i am sure it will be admissable in the law court.
Politics › Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by Demdem(m): 11:57am On Jul 05, 2012
donigspain: @Demdem, Yes, my line of argument conotes that am still uncertain if Otedola invited/contacted the SSS before the sting operation since the SSS is yet to make a public stance on Otedola's claims.

Thank you for accepting this fact. To u its not important but in the law court it could be the only thing that will render the whole case upside down. if the court finds out that otedola contacted SSS after the whole saga, new lines or argument will come to play. How i wish and hope he did contacted them at the beginning

Despite the afore, one thing we can't take away from Otedola is the fact that he is wise (cunning, crafty) enough to have evidence(s) to his favour. What difference does it make whether it's a joint sting operation between Otedola and the SSS or a solo sting operation of Otedola? The fact is that Otedola has got evidence(s) while Farouk has none!
Evidence surpasses all things in the court of law.

Well very easy to say to us non-learned like the lawyers always say. Let me paint a possible scenario:

Assuming we have a willing bribe giver in Otedola who promises to give farook an amount of money with promise of taking his companies names out.farook agreed and collected part payment not knowing that otedola has a video nearby doing the neccessary havoc. of cos farook did his own part of the bargain and otedollar felt well he isnt ready to part with the rest. he agreed to punish farook for even asking him money. he utilizes the security apparatus at his disposal (remember, SSS are daily guards for Otedollar) and gave them those recordings. farook is guilty no doubt but does this suggest that Otedollar is innocent? I doubt this. I agree he is a cunning and crafty man but sounds like a criminal to me also.
Politics › Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by Demdem(m): 11:46am On Jul 05, 2012
logica: And who says your president is not one of those powers? You think when we talk about "powers that be" the president is excluded? Dude!
basically, my president the retardeen is an accomplice. Wonderful.
Politics › Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by Demdem(m): 11:44am On Jul 05, 2012
IgweAni: [s]The one u made when u were already schooled, right?[/s]

Stuppid and inconsequential

U started making sense after u diverted ur view. Thank God u are learning, congrats @ least u r not fully lost as the other guy.


If u can kindly show the whole world now where my inconsistencies are i will admit hat u are smart but now, u are daft.
Politics › Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by Demdem(m): 11:41am On Jul 05, 2012
logica: It is the latter you should've been talking about not the former. As you said the SSS can also prosecute as they have the powers of the Police, but then the latter comes into play - willingness. I believe they are being held back by the "powers that be" who want this case to be quietly resolved as a PDP family affair (with 2 PDP "sons" quarreling).
if these "powers" are holding my own president (in charge of these security agents) the retardeen on his balls then i can confidently say that Otedola isnt being truthful completely either the same way farook seems not to.
Politics › Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by Demdem(m): 11:33am On Jul 05, 2012
IgweAni: Brother ask him o. I was even thinking he was using his brain.
brainless, av u seen my response?
Politics › Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by Demdem(m): 11:29am On Jul 05, 2012
logica: Who doesn't know we don't have a Police Force? If you are going to use the views of the Nigerian Police then I cannot take you seriously. It is clear that in saner climes, the Police would request for the evidence from who ever has possession and then take it from there.

Normally I should be able to record a crime and present the evidence to the Police to act (as a concerned citizen even without the aid of any law enforcement authorities). For instance look at the case against R Kelly whose purported video was found online. Even though he was eventually cleared, he was prosecuted on the strength of the evidence. But will this work in Nigeria? Get real please.
Am also aware that the same SSS can also charge criminals to court like the case of Ndume but am not sure if this one is under their purview 9if it is, let them charge him directly then). One thing i'm sure is the SSS, police and other security agents all have a single overall boss in the presidency. The issue at hand is not the uselessness of our police force but the will of the leadership in making sure that this case come to a conclusive end on time if at all there is even any case
Politics › Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by Demdem(m): 11:25am On Jul 05, 2012
Wereh kpe: I love this guy called Keyamo!

I also support what he said on Channels Last night's news

He said but not in this exact words: If we occupy the streets like we did during the fuel subsidy removal, Farouk will have no option but to resign!

Seriously, the corrupt house is supporting the criminal cus de too have collected the bribe! IF WE DONT OCCUPY, den WE DONT DESERVE TO COMPLAIN ABOUT THE STATE OF OUR COUNTRY! After all, you dont sleep and win wars but rather you fight to win wars
anyone that does this at this stage for now is simply daft. the whole truth isnt yet out.

Otedollar or SSS release of partial audio recording isnt helping matters
video not yet out. not even with the police.
Apparent Non-cooperation of the SSS with the police isnt helping matters
Farook's inconsistencies isnt helping matters
Otedollar's precedence also isnt helping matters. etc
Politics › Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by Demdem(m): 11:21am On Jul 05, 2012
ideylaff: Keyamo is meant to be a lawyer and he's already passing judgement on a case that is yet to go to court

All Farouk will do to get off the hook is claim prejudice.. simple....

All of them are the same.. Distraction agents... everybody don 4get 3 trillion abi na 2 trillion wey we dey find in the 1st place

Only yesterday the same set of accussed marketers were awarded bigger contracts again, Same old story... yeye dey smell big time
keyamo is just another Government Contractor and he simply wants the contract. imagine being a legal contractor for the SSS at the expense of one short mallam somewhere. Thats millions bros and its worth picking up.
Politics › Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by Demdem(m): 11:17am On Jul 05, 2012
logica: No it doesn't. Audio and video conclusively prove the act. The marked bills might only be useful in the money trail to pin-point all those involved. But I believe the money is long gone (probably through various Bureau de Change offices).
ur opinion no doubt and i respect it.
for the police, its bullshit and holds no water, even till yesterday, the so called Video evidence allegedly taken by Otedollar SSS (No one knows yet) isnt even with them.http://www.punchng.com/news/no-evidence-yet-to-prosecute-lawan-police/
Politics › Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by Demdem(m): 11:10am On Jul 05, 2012
donigspain: What case would Otedola have againt Farook if the SSS had arrested the latter on the trading spot prior to his final suggestion at the House that Otedola's company name be erased from the indicted list?

A lot, even if am to go by this line of argument of urs while did it take them weeks even after the removal before words came out to the press not even an arrest. The guy has no immunity and his arrest wont spark any killings whatsoever. abegii, that wont fly


IMO, whether the SSS was informed by Otedola before the 'sting' operation or not is not my concern as long as Otedola has enough evidence/fact [/b]to portray his 'innocence' in this case.

[b]It does matter my friend and its obvious to me from ur comment here that u are not even sure if it was an Otedola's string operation or SSS. otedola might have been a willing bribe giver and latter decides to jump ship as soon as Farook does his own part of the bargain. that to me is a possibility and i think knowing whose string operation we are dealing with is important.
European Football (EPL, UEFA, La Liga) › Re: Robin Van Persie Will Not Extend Arsenal Deal by Demdem(m): 10:54am On Jul 05, 2012
[quote author=dotcom_na_me_na_me]Let me tel you the bitter truth, i bet you and pls go and write today's date down. Arsenal will have a year to prove he’s wrong leaving!
Robin Van Persie will never leave Arsenal. If u're not an illiterate too or bias, it's a common sense now. Ok, tell me, where is he gonna go? You dont know anytin.
He knows himself that Arsenal is too big to depend on a player !
I bet u, at the end of the reason,we win a trophy,he will definitely put pen to paper.
Wenger has already said this in an interview, that people forget that Robin has one more year in his contract and he WILL be an Arsenal player next season…..

Now listen very carefully, Robin Van Persie will definitely sign a new contract with Arsenal. This will be the case because a lot of the speculation surrounding whether he will stay or not is based on qualitative data. According to the media Van Persie said that Arsenal have to prove that they want to challenge for trophies. That is a criteria that is immeasurable. How can you prove something like this? By spending 100 million? By buying more and more players that may or may not play well? By changing staff? By doing a pinkie swear?

This is more of a gambit on Van Persie’s side just to get the club into shape and make some people sweat. It reminds me of Rooney a few years back threatening to leave MU until he got assurances they would strengthen the club (and a big pay rise).

Club Statement: Robin van Persie

Arsenal Football Club has issued the following statement with regard to Robin van Persie's future:

"

We have to respect Robin's decision not to renew his contract. Robin has one year to run on his current contract and we are confident that he will fulfil his commitments to the Club.

"We are planning with ambition and confidence for next season with Arsenal's best interests in mind."
LOOK AT THE CLUB STATEMENTS LINK, obviously Robin Van persie will renew his contract provided that arsenal fufil their promise..

http://www.arsenal.com/news/news-archive/club-statement-robin-van-persie

Illiterates, don't reply to this, instead go back to school pls....[/quote]what trophy are u reffering to? av heard this for yrs now. listen to Persie himself

Out of my huge respect for Mr. Wenger, the players and the fans I don’t want to go into any details, but unfortunately in this meeting it has again become clear to me that we in many aspects disagree on the way Arsenal FC should move forward.
Politics › Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by Demdem(m): 10:37am On Jul 05, 2012
muami: SSS allowed him to roast in his own stew. In my view, the SSS did perfectly well in this case.
very bias statement from this government contractor called keyamo. Even the child in the womb knows that the SSS did a terrible job if truly they were in the picture at the beginning

Demdem: i wonder what the govt is still waiting for by not charging farook to court till date? is it that they know more than what Festus knows or what?
https://www.nairaland.com/981358/no-evidence-yet-prosecute-lawan
besides am not convinced that Otedola involved the SSS before the video capturing, my guts tells me he got them involved after the incidence.

If its truly a purely SSS operation, why should otedollar has a copy of all the recording? is this the normal standard practice? why wasnt farook arrested immediately? (if this was done, we wont be going through all of these wahala now). i disagree with festus, SSS did a terrible job in this case and that explains my reservation. its unlike them.
Politics › Re: No Evidence Yet To Prosecute Lawan – Police by Demdem(m): 10:27am On Jul 05, 2012
bayooooooo: Lawan will not be sentenced on the pages of Newspaper. All the pieces of evidence available at the public domain so far can not be used to even convict a world renown devil. They are too weak to even warrant prosecution as a mere no case submission will get those charges dropped.

The purported audio can even be discredited on sole account of incompleteness. If it's incomplete, then it must have been edited and if edited, it's not far fetched to emboss the notorious word "doctored" on the brea$t plate of the evidence and get it inadmissible in the court of law. Leaking this type of evidence does a great disservice to the case. It's even worse if the leakage is not emanating from the Police which as investigators are the rightful custodians of evidence.

I am of the opinion that the whole hullabaloo is to discredit the subsidy report and renders it infertile, worthless and non implementable.The powers that be are not interested in unearthing the truth not to even talk of meting out deserved punishment else the house would not call Otedola for a patently laughable in door session and the SSS that purportedly led the sting operation allowed the evidence to be discredited even before prosecution.

PDP is a party of kleptomaniacal thieves, wicked killers, recidivist liars, unpardonable villains and it will stop at nothing to see the destruction of Nigeria. The earlier we voted the thieves in power out the better for this country.
CASE CLOSED.
Politics › Re: No Evidence Yet To Prosecute Lawan – Police by Demdem(m): 10:24am On Jul 05, 2012
oluseg2: On why it is taking the police too long to conclude investigation, Mba stressed that with the evidence so far obtained, it would amount to a waste of time and public resources to rush to court.

He said, “You just don’t rush to court for the fun of charging people to court.
Interesting !!!
Politics › Re: NNPC Claims CBN Operates A Secret Account by Demdem(m): 10:20am On Jul 05, 2012
kodewrita: Considering the fact that Sanusi wasnt there in 2002, why put his picture here?

the logo of the CBN would have been more appropriate.

besides the title is wrong. This would have been more appropriate "NNPC Secret Account Solely Operated By CBN, says NNPC"
it doesnt matter, he met the fraud there and made sure the status quo remained. one thing is certain for sure, the killer party (PDP) has been there far more before then.
Politics › Re: NNPC Claims CBN Operates A Secret Account by Demdem(m): 10:17am On Jul 05, 2012
Beaf: [size=14pt]CBN operates secret account, says NNPC[/size]

Though Mrs. Okonjo-Iweala told the committee that she is aware of the account, she denied knowledge of its details, including the number.
This woman is something else. so she knew all these and she didnt tell us while going all over TV stations that Nigeria will crash if subsidy isnt removed and yet there was a secret account somewhere.
Now we know where those funds being used by the killer party for elections are kept. Am sure the executives headed by the retardeen would have never wanted this info in public domain. this is a strictly senate investigation.
Politics › Re: Otedola Is Silly & Misguided For Not Talking To House Committee – Committee by Demdem(m): 9:54am On Jul 05, 2012
I have no doubt in my mind that OBJ is otedollar's mentor.

Farook may not be clean but not these members of committee until there are reasons to doubt their integrity also. Against my desire otedollar cant dictate to the house how to conduct its business so the committee is right also (i would love a public investigation though). if truly the truth is with Otedollar (in addition to the presidency with him) and he is sincere, he will have no reason not to testify either in public or private knowing fully well that whatever the outcome of this investigation, this same presidency will have an option of either adopting it or not.
Foreign Affairs › Re: Canada Minister Resigns After Buying $16 Orange Juice Outside Budget by Demdem(m): 9:23am On Jul 05, 2012
my own preseident, the retardeen will come on live tv to tell me "he doesnt give a damn". the difference is clear.
Politics › Re: Farouk V Otedola - By Festus Keyamo by Demdem(m):
i wonder what the govt is still waiting for by not charging farook to court till date? is it that they know more than what Festus knows or what?
https://www.nairaland.com/981358/no-evidence-yet-prosecute-lawan
besides am not convinced that Otedola involved the SSS before the video capturing, my guts tells me he got them involved after the incidence.

If its truly a purely SSS operation, why should otedollar has a copy of all the recording? is this the normal standard practice? why wasnt farook arrested immediately? (if this was done, we wont be going through all of these wahala now). i disagree with festus, SSS did a terrible job in this case and that explains my reservation. its unlike them.
Politics › Re: GEJ To Sue House Of Reps Over Summon by Demdem(m): 8:46am On Jul 05, 2012
Kobojunkie: Nigerian Journalists are good at making up the most stupid. Why in the world would the President SUE the National Assembly over a summons that pertains to National Security? This is the same President who went on national TV on June 24th to reveal that he has not seen the summons and would welcome it. Now, less than 2 weeks, he is suing? If anyone should be sued, I think the DailyPost needs to be for this.
i adopt this post. however i'v always known the retardeen to say something today and do another tomorrow.
European Football (EPL, UEFA, La Liga) › Re: Robin Van Persie Will Not Extend Arsenal Deal by Demdem(m): 8:42am On Jul 05, 2012
Its good for the player jare. Good players will want to win medals but the big question is will he be able to acheive that with arsenal? look at Nasri, that small boy already a champion already. Abegii, i will do the same jare.
Politics › Re: I Will Meet Boko Haram Members For Dialogue – Dasuki by Demdem(m): 8:33am On Jul 05, 2012
I dont support dialogue with these guys the same way i never supported dialogue with killer MEND. Amnesty should seize henceforth, their leaders tried and prosecuted for the various atrocities committed and aggressive development of the Niger-delta which still elude this region till date (despite amnesty in play) should commence. The same treatment also for Boko IMO
Politics › Re: Justice Aloma Mariam Mukhtar : Nigeria’s First Female Chief Justice: A Profile by Demdem(m): 8:28am On Jul 05, 2012
Congrats to Mukhtar. She has been a judge for a long time now and climb through the ladders progressively. The RETARDEEN simply had to choice put to follow due process. anyone that says otherwise is a retaard.


Justice Mukhtar began her legal career as a pupil counsel in the Ministry of Justice of Northern Nigeria in 1967. She was later appointed Magistrate Grade I, North Eastern Government (1969 – 1973), thus scoring another first as the first female Magistrate in the Northern region.

She made another history with her appointment as the Chief Registrar, Kano State Government Judiciary (1973 – 1977) and Judge, High Court of Kano State in 1977 and Justice, Court of Appeal in 1987. She is at present the most senior Justice of the Supreme Court.
Justice Muktar has been a life Bencher since 1993 and a life member of the Federation of Women Lawyers. She was also the Vice President of the National Association of Women Judges of Nigeria. In 1989, Muktar was honoured by the Federation of Women Lawyers and in 1991; she was decorated with a Gold Merit Award by the Kano State Government.


this woman definately has a history. kudos on ur Acheivement
Politics › Re: I Will Meet Boko Haram Members For Dialogue – Dasuki by Demdem(m): 8:15am On Jul 05, 2012
Beaf: The only good reason to negotiate with boko haram is to gather them together and kill the bastards. angry
i wonder why the RETARDEEN hasnt done this all these while despite the fact that he has the list of all these people (evil Boko sponsors) with him for close to a year now therby allowing innocents Nigerians to die in vain. Their blood will forever haunt him. In addition, he lied to us on national TV that this group is faceless
Politics › Re: Pastor Bakare Hits Harder: “down, Down Jonathan” by Demdem(m): 8:04am On Jul 05, 2012
tunnytox: [size=23pt]ALL ENEMIES OF NIGERIA WILL PERISH VERY SOON[/size]
[size=20pt]Even now they have started shivering with bakare's undiluted truth. Their paid agents will never have rest[/size]
Politics › Re: El-rufai: A Nationalist Or Hypocrite? by Demdem(m): 5:16pm On Jul 03, 2012
El-Rufai isnt a saint neither is he the Devil. As far as i am concerned he is still the best FCT Minister we have had so far even till date.
I'm very well ok with him despite some few shortcomings though. I respect him.
NYSC › Re: Reps Stop NYSC From Posting Graduates To Volatile States by Demdem(m): 4:53pm On Jul 03, 2012
The house has given an order but i doubt if NYSC is bound to obey.
The other day when the senate ordered that FRSC should reduce its fees, the fees still remain till date.
besides, if NYSC dont post innocent corpers to those states, how will the officials of NYSC especially from those states have also their own part of the national cake grin grin
Politics › Re: Pastor Bakare Hits Harder: “down, Down Jonathan” by Demdem(m): 11:55am On Jul 02, 2012
Beaf: All false prophets will go to hell.
Amen to that Bro.
Politics › Re: Pastor Bakare Hits Harder: “down, Down Jonathan” by Demdem(m): 11:40am On Jul 02, 2012
[quote author=jt2010][/quote]Thats my president.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 (of 646 pages)