₦airaland Forum

UyaiIncomparabl:


That's exactly what you people say. Your main monikers are usually popular, why?

The trend of opening countless threads these days is unbecoming, astounding, and relentless!
Don't worry, we know you people's plot, to garner traffic of course. Please, entertain us whilst the offer lasts. I repeat I shall not waste my time trying to advise you ceaseless trolls. If truly you need advice and are in such a precarious situation, you should have, as a matter of necessity, unraveled the fact that you are being played by your bobo. But no, you're here to read what a bunch of unknown people will tell you. Please, have at it while at it. Au revoir.

I wonder what you are feeling like, keep quiet.

Ishilove:
I don't blame her. It will be hard for someone like me wey gather well to whip it out in public, crying baby or not.

If you truly "gather," send me a proof photo. My new passive ambition is to make you a better woman in all forms. In fact, tell your people that you have found a husband.

The fact that he snapped a picture in a music studio does not automatically mean that he was a music producer.

Ishilove:
Some churches like MFM and Deeper Life do not wear rings. What's the big deal about rings sef? Us humans like complicating matters for ourselves.

Any man who picks offence because of ring is immature, carnal and does not know that marriage is not a playground.

We not "us" humans. An intelligent person knows that it is wrong to start a sentence with an object pronoun. In fact, I have observed that you do not even know the difference between a subject pronoun and an object pronoun.

Ishilove:
Needless verbosity has made reading your post carefully very challenging. You don't need to string together high sounding words to pass across a message. It only serves to distract the reader.

In short, I suspect you're up to no good with this story because you're hustling for front page after writing all these yeye grammer wey no gel.

Grammar is the correct spelling, not "grammer." The same you who claimed tired of people writing bad grammar and spelling words incorrectly.

People like you who do not tolerate others or overrate yourselves usually have empty head and lack real confidence.

Omar09:
Men are trained to have dignity. Once you understand it, you also learn to teach yourself that. Ariza wasn't lying and neither did she mince words.

You shout simp simp simp everywhere, yet here you are defending nonsense from a woman who openly insulted men in her message just because two of you may be close to each other.

Well, "Omar09, you aren't trained to have dignity, self respect, self worth , common sense or pride." according to her. Only a foolish man will not see the insult against men in her post. I am not surprised anyway because I know that people like you who are quick to claim redpill are the real simps. Actually, I do not have time to exchange words with little children like you, so take your nonsense to another person

Ariza:
No they can't because they weren't taught. Men aren't trained to have Dignity, self respect, self worth , common sense or pride. They learn it through bitter experiences while some don't till they die.

When I first came across Redpill, I misunderstood and hated it but when I took my time to read more about it, I got the silent message it passes, of course like other ideologies there will be extremists who will take things too far but the message with the real Redpill is a necessity in Nigeria. And it will help a lot of sanely practiced.

Truth is there's nothing sexy about a SIMP. However I must define what a simp is to me to avoid being misquoted. A Simp is a guy who pours at the sight of anything in skirt, a desperate attention seeker who needs validations as little as a pat on the back from a female to feel human. A Simp to me is one who tries too hard just to get laid and one with no self control and isn't comfortable in his own skin. Unfortunately this is the definition of Typical Nigerian Man. And there is nothing sexy about HIM. Not that I blame him though, he is moulded by his society that way.

If Redpill can be preached sanely with no extreme ,it will be of great impact in the society. Because the truth is, Women are no longer at that position society used to have them. Women have evolved and with the way things are only the fittest will survive.


BTW, I will continue to call out fake alpha males and redpillers like I call out fake Feminists. Me, ehn I hate attaches And they are plenty on Nl

What is this nonsense: " Men aren't trained to have Dignity, self respect, self worth , common sense or pride."

The way people like you write nonsense with boldness is nauseating. Unfortunately, people like you are many in this forum.

And this too: "Me, ehn I hate attaches" In my short stay in this forum, you are one of the people I know that no sensible person will take serious because pretence is written all over you.

Hathor5:
This one wants to post his asset declaration to make a point. LMAO

There is no need for deflection. I do not have anything against women, I mentioned that part because of women like you in particular going by your comment in this thread. So, you have a choice to either take on my challenge or you shut up.

MummyIMadeIt:
Dear Op,

Have you ever considered why this is called an online forum?

Do you know 90% of the character displayed online isn't real, let's put as an alternate lifestyle is what most persons display here.

So those monickers mentioned might and can be so different in the real life out there, and Prolly using the cyberspace as a means to vent out their underlying voices.

As per the topic of discussion, good character comes first in both parties.

No one should get me wrong, I do not know any of the forum members I mentioned and I do not have anything against them since I am yet to know any member here. I mentioned them because they were used as a reference point as women with bad character in the deleted thread.

LilMissFavvy:
I thought you men normally boast that feminists do not find husband's, and that once a gal reaches 30, she's an evening newspaper, such nonsense. How come you are talking about the men in the lives of the ladies you mentioned? How dare you drag their partners into the stupittyy that runs on NL?. I may not have seen the other thread you have talked about, but I bet if you are fair in judgement, you would see clearly, that guys here insultt and abuse the ladies far much than we do.

Your second to last paragraphs is so childish and funny, pls grow up.

Not all men are healthy. Besides, I do not have anything against feminists, unless your definition of a feminist is someone with a poor character. This is not time for deflection because as much as I do not know you, I will not tolerate foolishness from you.

No healthy man will ever tolerate a woman with poor character in his life and I know for sure that no healthy woman will equally tolerate a man with poor character in her life too. I create this thread to correct the misleading comments I read from Expensiverichy.b's deleted thread where some women say the fact that coco.handy has a husband and poco.hantas now has a man in her life too, even though they are said to be known as women with poor character who take pleasure in abusing men in this forum, has rubbished the age long believe that a woman needs to have a good character in order to have a man in her life and keep him. Once more, I say no healthy man will ever tolerate a woman who has poor character in his life.

Truth is that, any man who does not see anything wrong in his wife or girlfriend going from one thread to another abusing men is not healthy and a time will come when he will be the one constantly at the receiving end of her abuses. 

There is nothing wrong with a woman having her voice, like men, but there is everything wrong with a woman who takes pleasure in abusing men, or a man who does the same. A woman who has a good family background and upbringing will know that she does not need to abuse men to have a feel of sense of importance. 

Before any woman will start to broke shame me, have it in mind that money is not one of the things I lack in my life, but if you think otherwise I challenge you or the man in your life to post his assets declaration form, if he has any, from anywhere in the world, while I post mine. Or, we can appoint some independent members of the forum and pay them to go and verify our individual assets. 

I am not jealous either, because I am a married man and I am not looking for a new wife or mistress.

AdaFidelis:
Haba....this is too much na...

She caused it.

PrimadonnaO:
No idea.

Y’all should just let her be.

Really?

Ishilove:
I know who the person is. Stay there let the fellow be deceiving you because for you not to know the difference between wrong grammar usage and downright grammatical errors show you don't even know what you are talking about and as such not even worth my time.

He was right. Actually, I wonder what you are feeling like. You really exposed your ignorance that day. And there is even a grammatical error in this your reply here, that you cannot see it shows your level of ignorance.

Ishilove:
Everywhere I turn there is bad grammar. It is getting to me

You are not better than most of the people who write bad grammar. I saw where you made a mistake the other day while trying to correct someone who did not make a mistake.

Patiks:
Now I know you need help.

Happy children's day to you and every other kid in this thread.

Patiks:
There is no standard for it? Stop displaying your ignorance, please. This your mentality is why certain people/tribe in Lagos refer to a lady between 20-30 as Mummy or Mama.

Of course there's nothing wrong with giving your opinion, but note that there is a reason why some opinions are rated 0/100 while some are graded 50/100, and some could even earn 95/100.

In my opinion, and that of many before me, this your opinion is 0.5/100.

Op, do the right thing and stop arguing blindly.

I come in peace.

Idiot. Take your frustration to another place

Mineisgrace:
you can not start a family in a self con
Self con means self contained and not 2 contained.

The same you who live in a face me I face you one room with your family of 8 said this nonsense here. Social media life is truly something else.

funmisticqueen2:
Cos many men are not psychopaths and paedophiles


This op sounds like a waste of school fees

I am not here to bash women, so I wonder why most of you women are triggered

Ladyhippolyta88:
How is 27- 40 middle aged?

Person go just wake up open rubbish thread

You are crazy. Adult young age can be 18 - 34 or 12 - 34, mid-age can be 35 - 39 or 35 - 44, middle age can be 40 to 55 or 45 - 65, old age is 66 - infinity.

So, there's nothing wrong in using my own definition to capture my thoughts, because there is no standard for it.

Oluromantic:
Leave Wikipedia. I'm sure you can relate to what the op is saying in this society we find ourself.

Thank you.

bukatyne:
27 is middle aged? Even 40 isn't.

According to Wikipedia, 45yrs - 65yrs is.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_age

That is Wikipedia own and I do not have a problem with it. I have my reason for limiting it between 27 - 40.

Men what is the main reason why you will choose to marry a middle aged woman over a young woman?

The aim of this thread is not to bash women and this is my personal definition of middle aged woman because it is has standard definition.

Heiterkeit:
Didn't you notice that she is opinionated during the time you were dating her?

maybe she pretended not to be like that when they were courting.

You only find it hard to believe because men have been taught from childhood through adulthood that women are deep and mysterious angelic beings that should be loved, protected and respected for being women (ie merely being in possession of a vagina). Concepts inculcated at an early age are very hard to let go. In reality, the full depth of women is that they are slaves to these two base cravings and nothing else.

Women evolved to be that way, because those were the two primary skills required for their survival in our prehistoric past, always being the weaker, more dependent sex; the attention of an alpha male and the ability of the female to recognise the best provider and to give herself sexually to him. In the past, women had no problem with that, because the alpha male was often simultaneously the best provider, so she gave him sex and gained status (attention) and the best zebra parts and fruit trees (financial security) in return.

Nowadays, the beta is usually the best provider and attention giver; ready to work 9-5 and spend all on her; but genetically, the alpha still attracts her sexually. This is why there is so much discontentment of women in marriage and why women cheat so much on their husbands in modern times.

Of course, women prefer to pretend that all these cravings are actually functions of the loftier attributes of 'love'; and are addicted to romantic dramas and books that promote this false narrative as a consequence; but the reality is very different. Even the idealism within those dramas have the perfectly romantic man as one who is practically subservient to the woman's two cravings; security and attention.

I agree with you to some extent.

RisenPhoenix:
If you are referring to behaviour in general; then yes; at the fundamental level, all women crave financial security and attention and they all seek to outdo each other in these areas. Beyond this level however, different women have different methods of sophistication in fulfilling these cravings. How they behave will depend on their individual levels of sophistication.

If you are referring only to behaviour with men who are not their relatives, again it depends on their level of sophistication and also on how well they perceive that man to be capable of satisfying the above mentioned cravings. Just keep in mind however, that the primary drivers in women are those cravings. They are unable to get away from them.

Yes I mean behavior in general. But I find it hard to believe this 'at the fundamental level, all women crave financial security and attention and they all seek to outdo each other in these areas.'

Heiterkeit:
No.

Please explain in detail.

budaatum:
Do all men have the same attitude?

Do you think otherwise?

Professorcplus:
Actually no. Some are just fashionable and will milk you off your money, they always want the lastest gadgets and material things. If you're loaded them you are good to handle her.

And some are play girls. They can date more than 3 guys at same time. This ones can give man hypertension. As a Sharp guy you can strike her if you know the right words.

The Nerd girls are all about books. They only discuss intelligent topics. Some are reserved and pursue dreams. You have to be a gentle, know her interest as that's how you can get her attention.

The Church girl. If it's not about church forget her. She want to live a perfect and holy life without mistakes. They make a good mother though. If you are a brother will annoying thing then you can consider a chance With her.

Feminine you already know them I wont say a word.

The adventurous girl. Sport, gamer, film freck, always loose around guys. Guys often take advantage of their weaknesses.

The ambitious girl always hungry for success in their career. Quite cleaver and always take the leadership role. Their motto is career first, relationship second.

Lastly, the low self-esteem girl. They want reassurance from the guy about his love. Usually thinks they aren't good enough for the guy.

Add Yours

Thanks.

LordKO:
No, because women (and men alike) come in three different mental profiles, viz:

1. Fair-minded woman - the conscientious/principled woman. If you as a man is conscientious and believe in altruism (love and submission) in word and deed, a woman in this group is a best fit for you - of course, she doesn't condone nonsense.

2. Headstrong woman - a woman who's penchant for subjugation and abuse - the crass/expedient/stubborn/egoistic woman. As a man if you are subjugable or don't mind being subjugated, a woman in this group is a best fit for you. In other words, you have to be/become a feeble-minded man to put up with her - unfortunately, behind any servile person is a disingenuous person too.

3. Feeble-minded woman - a servile and/or disingenuous woman. As a man if you belong to the second group above, a feeble-minded woman is a best fit for you because she will gladly put up with any kind of nonsense you will mete out on her - of course, she'll ruin you from within to your own chagrin.

I don't need to tell you what'll happen when a man and woman who mutually belong to the second group above date or are joined together in matrimony.

Meanwhile, only classy and sane women belong to the first group. They may have almost all the power/possessions and know almost all things (good and bad), yet they choose to remain good/humane/humble. Always accord them their respect whenever you come across them, whether or not you belong to that group.

Of course, perfection is only of the sole creator of the world.

Thanks.