₦airaland Forum

If he wins - give him a massage

If he loses - train him proper

am I fine ö?

imhotep

biopsY

True

"madness is genius"

The girls.

kariolality:
The minute hand of a circular clock is on '1' and another hand is on '5' , Find the angle between the two hands,

120° angle.

[quote author=Okija_juju link=topic=855470.msg10050670#msg10050670 date=1327568423]@ Seun

Simply reply thus;[/quote]Terse

norrisman:
Who is a man of God? Is Jonathan and other politicians, men of devil. there is no special position knwn as man of God and If we are all Gods children then we are all men, women and children of God. Why is acceptable in the eyes of morons such as the one who sent you the email to rain abuses on politicians but not pastors? Erastus Akingbola is a pastor, why didnt the EFCC leave him alone because he is a man of God.

E no go better 1000 times for Oyedepo and all the other pastors that have held their mumucious congregation in perpetual slavery.

So true. Abi you be "man of truth"?

hug him until he suffocates

sauer:
You guys are so dumb o! (yes, let me revel in calling you dumb!  ). I posted the question twice, and provided the answer those two times, for specific reasons.

There was a question, "What is the fifth son's name?"; and there was an answer "Thanks all!" 

Satisfied?

sauer:
Those who visited the internet in search of answers must be so disappointed by now! 

Lol.

No offense but does this apply to all people who adhere to different beliefs outside of Christianity? because if so, what duty do such people have to this God that they do not adhere to?
I guess recently this section has deviated somewhat, now becoming a daily exposé of nefarious activities of these so called "men of God" but does being among the circle of "God's men" make one immune from criticism?

If you visit the Christian section you will see so many threads and
topics castigating and insulting several men of God.

Well insulting seems to be the modus operandi of this entire forum. It's not exclusive to this section except the abuse is levelled at "God's men" and I think some people are so used to insulting as a means of communication. I do think however the sender has a right to be upset but not because the abuse is directed to "God's men". Abuse is not really a necessary form of dialogue even when venting in my opinion - most especially as not all stories or rumours are even verified.

But is this a warning or a threat?

P.S Seun don't forget to post the mail, threatening the wrath of the government if Nairalanders continue to insult GEJ et al

Nail his feet to the floor boards. Lower the ceiling fan. Turn the fan on and satisfactorily watch the red liquid fountain pour fluently from his ripped neck.

handcuff his hands

help him look for his missing teeth

La Parasite

Outstrip:
I was never a pink loving girl or interested inplaying with with dolls. It is just silly to make a big deal of this. The parents are even contradicting themselves to make this silly point. Why give him a feminine name then.

Yeah I was wondering if they could spot the contradiction themselves. In trying to rear their child in a "gender neutral" way they deliberately additionally provided him with toys and the likes - that according to the same stereotypes they are trying to challenge - are associated with girls. I understand what they are trying to do but it's not part of the package of being a little girl to love all things pink and they are just nurturing him under both stereotypes as a means of moulding him to be "neutral" in my honest opinion. Besides there are many "gender neutral" toys/ activities etc that are not bound by these gender stereotypes.
But I think it's one thing for the young boy to naturally crave for these type of activities and another for such to be instilled in him. Because I have seen young children who have made that distinction at an early age and may not even adhere to those stereotypes and want for things that are supposedly for a "him" or a "her" instead of it being ingrained in them.

I'm actually surprised they never gave their son a feminine name. Sasha is a unisex name.

Outstrip:
I was never a pink loving girl or interested inplaying with with dolls.

Same here. Actually my parents weren't into all that. They never provided me with those type of toys i.e. barbie etc and I have a unisex name and despite all that they never made my gender redundant in my upbringing or moulded me into a "neutral".

However I find this "gender neutral" upbringing quite intriguing.

sauer:
bring your cheek close, let me do you the favour!

*rests her left cheek on his right shoulder* oya spill

Brisingr:
oga sauer if the ans is not WHAT den what is ?

maybe he no know the answer sef

șåùëŕ

sœur

salut.

abegi, xcuse me pass jor

subdue him with a horse tranquilizer

sauer:
Nah! Wrong! Please try harder, I feel like kissing 

Just provide the answer (if any) to the wayo question already. This riddle has gotten stale
I even suspect you sef

feed him dog food

orisha

emöral

boyish? (still in doubt )

zayhal:
Each gender is created the way it is for specific roles. This gender neutral thing is absurd and can not work anyway.

Nothing that this end time won't bring.

Yeah there are specific roles for each gender but then there are also stereotypical roles attached to each i.e. young girls must therefore be attracted to dolls and all things pink. Young boys must like blue and football is a "lad's sport" etc.
Stereotypes doesn't have to match specific gender role. If a boy liked pink and played with dolls would his masculinity and sexuality not be questioned? Some people operate outside those gender casting roles.
At least that was the purpose behind this child's upbringing as the parents do not adhere to gender stereotyping. They didn't want their son to be governed by societies notions of how each gender is supposed to behave.

mutter:
When my first son was about 7 I gave him a lecture about ,"what a man can do, a woman can do, " I was driving on a not too busy road. He just listened and suddenly he said "mummy stop the car".  I stopped and he got down opened his zip and "watered" the nearby shrubs. There were passerby's but it didn`t bother him. He got back into the car smiled at me and said, " okay mummy since a woman can do what a man can do go and do the same". I had to correct myself. He was right. "okay a woman can do most things a man can do and vice versa"
This really happened and I still laugh about it till today.

Lol.

If one doesn't adhere to A (God) do such people then by default automatically fall into group B (the adversary/antithesis to God)?

Are there no in-betweens?