Enigma's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Enigma's Profile › Enigma's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 (of 198 pages)
ogajim:Very much agreed, ogajim (and, in passing, we all look through a glass darkly!). I have to say though that I am very pleased with viaro's work on this thread. I had actually been looking for that clause of RCCG fundamental belief on tithes/tithing and was initially stumped to find that it was no longer on their main/central website, So it was nice to see that it had been discovered on their other sites. Do you notice that while the main/central site removes the clause on tithes/tithing, it is basically identical in other respects with the other sites? As I said before, the clause was on the main site for years ---- I am sure its removal is in part due to the kind of challenge being posed to the nonsensical doctrine by the kind of debates we have here. I tell a story: earlier on this decade, the RCCG GO's annual prophecies were posted on the website; there followed several debates (I believe some here on nairaland --- but also on the then RCCG website forum) where the prophecies were exposed to serious ridicule; the following year, the annual prophecies posted were bland, generic and lacking specificity; I think the prophecies have been following that bland pattern (that anyone can do) since! |
Tithe and Offering(all emphases added --- not original) The above used to be on the main RCCG (i.e. central/global rccg.org) website for years; I notice it has been removed from the "Fundamental Belief" (sic) section. In the early days of the web some of us attacked it strenuously in web debates. I wonder how long before the rest of the RCCG websites (such as South Africa and Netherlands above and etc) also take it off; if they do, don't be deceived, they will have only gone underground with it; internally they will still be fleecing their flock with both subtle and strong arm tactics. |
"Pastor" Joagbaje's version: Joagbaje:Originally, I thought that by "bla bla", Joagbaje meant "words of confession" ---- as in "blab n grab" of Word of Faith/prosperity "gospel". Perhaps he actually meant they gave him "money"(?) --- in which case the "testimony" as erstwhile presented by Joagbaje is no more than a second-hand account and it boils down to whether we find the "testimony" and the testifier credible. |
aletheia:Glad to see you are fine, aletheia. |
As Christians, it would please us for a story like this to be true. However, we cannot support something which is unsubstantiated and which even as presented in the opening post evinces embellishments, glorifies man and unquestioningly raises suspicion. I have seen and heard a "testimony" of similar circumstances given in an RCCG church in Lagos some years ago: bottom line was that the "testifier" used that "testimony" to ask for an offering - which is also similar to an aspect of the opening post. What is more ---- you have only the word of the testifier; when Joagbaje first mentioned this in another thread, I got the impression that Joagbaje was directly involved in the "miracle" ---- the impression I got was that Joagbaje and others "confessed" scriptures over the man was what saved the fella. I will search for that his post and compare with the opening post because there seems to be a difference. Also look at some of the aspects of the "testimony": mabell:First sign of embellishment --- indeed suggesting a possible tissue of lies. He was converted to christianity in Mecca in a dramatic and spectacular way. Now, because of this when he came back, the moslems sought to kill him because after his conversion he did not just keep quiet but he went about sharing his testimony about his conversion and also preaching the gospel.He became a popular evangelist and became part of a church ministry in jos.Second sign of embellishment --- again suggesting tissue of lies. On the faithful day, he said he dropped his children off in school and branched by a business centre to do some printing and photocopying when a serious crisis that would almost cost him his life broke out. When the fight broke out, the moslems caught him, burnt his car and dragged him to a bush to kill him. He said he was surrounded with a bow and arrow to his head with dead bodies lying all around him. He was then given two options, to either be killed by the bow and arrow or drink a deadly mix( a mixture of cement and some poisonous chemical).Did they drag others into the bush --- or simply kill them where they were found according to news reports? Were the others given a choice of poison or were they simply killed by bow and arrow? Also, a lot of reports suggests that many of the sad sad killings were done by machete. There are other gaps and things to question in the rest of the "testimony" but these are enough food for thought to start with. |
selencious:Have you ever seen the quote below? Do you have any idea where it comes from? If your answer to either of those is no (even if your answer is yes), then go and think about it and come back to say if you still believe what you wrote to be correct Christian doctrine! We believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of Life, ![]() |
obnelly:Ah, yes!!! I do indeed agree with that. |
Very good post. I believe that your cousin's perspective on "praying unceasingly" is a good one. Also remember that God knows what you are going to pray for even before you ask for it. Furthermore, we are taught not to make vain repetitions in our prayers. Finally, we can see the simplicity of the prayer that the Lord taught us i.e. the Lord's prayer as well as the simplicity of His own prayers as recorded in the Bible. None of these means that we cannot pray intensely of course. |
Joagbaje:Interesting that this is the second Oyakhilome follower to refer to him (granted probably subconsciously) as Christ!!! Another follower did the same in a thread title not long ago. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm! ![]() |
I am surprised that the defenders of "word of faith" have not either come to the defence of this chap ---- or at least explain if and why they disagree with him! |
blacklion:I will say go for the first one because of the added bonus that it can also do digital terrestrial television. Yes, both will work for satellite television when connected to a satellite dish aligned correctly. obnelly:obnelly, sorry this is still wrong! You cannot increase the signal from a satellite by the fact that many dishes are pointed at it. adewest:We talked about that combined C/Ku LNB in seasons 1 & 2 when it was still new. It might not have caught on yet in Nigeria because of non-availability, the price and the fact that people were getting good results with the conventional ways of doing things. Also, when the combined LNB first came out there was concern about its performance efficiency. |
Another dimension to "word of faith", "acting on faith", "claiming by faith", "blab and grab"! “I acted on the faith I have in Jesus Christ of Nazareth. I did not have the money in my bank account. But I issued the cheque to the company even when I knew it was a dud cheque. I acted on my faith which made me to break the law when I wrote a cheque without the money in my bank account,” wrote Uwakaneme in his statement to the police.For full story see Man Defrauds Elizade Motors In Jesus' Name ![]() EDITED: Cross reference Sinners In Christ Embassy,steal Millions Of Naira In Church’s Bank |
Another dimension to "word of faith", "acting on faith", "claiming by faith", "blab and grab"! “I acted on the faith I have in Jesus Christ of Nazareth. I did not have the money in my bank account. But I issued the cheque to the company even when I knew it was a dud cheque. I acted on my faith which made me to break the law when I wrote a cheque without the money in my bank account,” wrote Uwakaneme in his statement to the police.For full story see Man Defrauds Elizade Motors In Jesus' Name ![]() |
To be honest, even me sef I don tire; Joagbaje case, na only divine intervention fit do am! ![]() On a more serious note, I have found that his post that I referred to: Joagbaje:For the benefit of those who don't understand Yoruba, the words "ofo" and "ogede" basically mean juju incantations; what Joagbaje is referring to is a battle of spiritual (juju) powers by the exchange of "ofo" (incantations" where the person with the superior power will eventually subdue (maybe even kill) the other.Again question for Joagbaje: apart from WoF which other Christian denomination sees Christianity and especially "faith" in this way? ETA Compare Proverbs 18:10 The name of the LORD is a strong tower; the righteous run to it and are safe. |
Joagbaje:Which Christian denomination (i.e. apart from WoF) agrees with you and WoF that: (a) Jesus was just a man who could only act/operate by faith (b) A Christian is "god" or "God" (c) The Lord's prayer - especially thy will be done - which Jesus taught to His disciples is not for the "mature born-again" person. It not a contradiction if I say spirits are illegal on this planet and man is a spirit. That is the reason God put man in the human body to have a legal right to function, if a man loses his body , he is out of this plane. If God must function here, he must require a physical body too. but certainly not the heavenly body.So is satan not operating on this planet? Is satan physical? It is not illegal for satan as a spirit to operate on this planet but it is illegal for God as a spirit to do it? So as a spirit God is even less than satan, also as a spirit, on this planet? You cannot see the daftness of the WoF logic that your man and his more Further: How did God appear to Moses in the burning bush again? Which physical body did He use? How did Elijah and Moses appear with the Lord during the transfiguration? I have confined myself to only the above in your post to keep things brief. I will make a comment though ---- you do not really understand when aletheia accuses you of gnosticism. With your constant references to "in the spirit realm" and the way you use that phrase you might as well be practising the same religion and "faith" as occultists, witches, Fadeyi oloro, etc. In fact I do remember a post where you compared your use of "the word" to their practises. |
[quote author=petres_007 link=topic=407858.msg5665973#msg5665973 date=1268247676]Sometimes I wonder where their allegiance lies. With God and his Christ, or with these false ministers who wrongly divide the word of truth and feed them all the fairy tales their itching ears want to hear.[/quote]For some of these people, it seems that if Jesus Christ Himself were to come today and tell them that Oyaks is talking trash they will still follow Oyaks ---- that is the extent of the brainwashing! Afterall, they have already denigrated the teachings of people whom Jesus Christ Himself appointed and delegated first-hand including the apostles James, Paul etc. when those teachings contradict some of the heterodox nonsense that Oyaks tickles their itching ears with. |
InesQor:I'm sure this is one of the "far far deeper" teachings --- but see one of the earlier sources of the teaching by WoF head honcho Kenneth Copeland |
Joagbaje:The same way I judge Oyakhilome by the heresies that he teaches/preaches! And in your case, even if I don't mention Oyakhilome or WoF most of what I have seen you express on this board are either erroneous, heterodox and heretical or just misinformed. Only, I know the source and origin of what you spout ----- you do not deny that they are from Oyakhilome; and I know where Oyakhilome gets his own heresies from --- it is from the Word of Faith movement. I have heard him ---- and he has never said anything that I could not trace where he got it from. So he is not saying anything "deep"; Oyakhilome's teaching that you consider "deep", "deeper", or "deepest", I reckon I am far more likely than not to call heresy. |
@Joagbaje Well, as you said you are not giving straight answers and I am not surprised. Also instructive is your manner of answering whether you are "god" or "God". Anyway, I think I have already done enough of pestering today so I'll leave you to "think on these things". |
Here again, which of these do you subscribe to? Which do you disagree with? Which do you reject? Enigma:PS There are more that I will ask similarly after you deal with these. |
Joagbaje:You are still being duplicitous! There are certain things that only those who subscribe to WoF doctrine believe ----- which the rest of Christianity does not believe. That is the point ---- not whether Christians disagree on some things (e.g. washing of feet as the example you use). Oyakhilome certainly teaches WoF doctrine ---- I have seen him do it; and I have seen him pass off Kenyon/Hagin teachings as though they were some revelation to himself (Oyakhilome) Contrary to your pretense above asking for me to quote where you said you followed Kenyon's teaching, here is something you wrote not too long ago: Joagbaje:See, that is not merely quoting Kenyon; that is a statement of quintessential WoF doctrine. Here is a link I have given previously regarding WoF doctrine: http://www.gotquestions.org/Word-Faith.html ![]() |
nuella2:Nah, I deliberately answered your question that way ----- in the hope it might make you think. Let me try another tack: When God first asked the prophet to tell Hezekiah that he would die ----- did God know at that time that Hezekiah would plead for his life; also, did God know that He (God) would still later tell the prophet to go back and tell Hezekiah that his life was spared? Or perhaps God could not see the future? Perhaps God is not Omniscient ----- did He not Know that Abraham was going to plead for the people of Sodom? If you believe that God cannot see the future, then perhaps it is easy to believe that God can get His own will wrong and then need to change it after man points out God's own error to Him! |
Do you see now that we are going round in circles? As I said before, I'll leave you with your own understanding, the questions I posed and the statements that I made on page 3 (which actually cryptically answer your last question). |
nuella2:See the bit I've underlined ---- thus: Which would you rather have: that which God wills for you OR that which you will for yourself? |
nuella2:OK I wont refer to Word of Faith movement (if you like). Second, already I am being dragged into going round in circles, which I wanted to avoid ---- so I will just leave you with the last question once again. If you can make God change His original will (A) to another one (B), does it not mean: (1) that God was wrong to have chosen His original will (A); and (2) that you know better than God since you chose (B) which God later agreed with you is better than His own original (A)? |
nuella2:You are right that I sounded like I did not want to waste my time. The reason is simple: my answer to the point you made is in my post that you quoted as well as in an earlier post where I said that Christians worldwide believe in intercession --- but that is not the same as forcing/compelling (or even preventing) the will of God. You may argue that interceding to change God's mind is the same as changing the will of God; even IF I grant you that, what still transpires in the end is the will of God ---- either as He always planned it or as His mind has apparently been changed. If you can change the will of God, do you not think that it means you know better than God --- since the will of God was wrong or not good and therefore needed to be changed? Anyway, I will not be surprised if you think you know better than God because in essence that is what adherents of the Word of faith movement really teach/believe ----- even if the less thoughtful ones do not realise it! |
nuella2:If that is your understanding, you can have it; I do not see the point of going round in circles. |
ogajim:Precisely!!!!!!!!!!!! And this begins to answer the question which observers might reasonably ask ----- does God change His own mind? Similarly, people forget that God had already decided some things "even before the foundation of the world" according to the Bible. Anyway, I reckon that discussion is probably for another thread. |
nuella2:You are confusing yourself: if God does not change, how do you change His will then? So is it God that changes His own will/decision ----- or is it man that changes God's will/decision? If God wills A and man wills B ----- can man bring B to pass if God does not change His mind? Even if God does change His mind from A to B and B happens ---- was it the man that brought B to pass or was it God Himself that brought B to pass? |
nuella2:OK I'll keep Oyakhilome out of it for now; (We have had to mention his name because we know that a number of those arguing the nonsense that the Lord's prayer is for babies are his followers --- as many of them have admitted. Are you or are you not a member of his church and/or not a follower of his teachings?) Anyway, if you go back and study the Bible passages relating to when Christ taught His disciples that prayer I would expect that you would not need to ask why it is called the Lord's prayer. |
nuella2:So when God dialogued with Abraham, God then needed the cooperation of How about Hezekiah ---- when God said 'I have heard your prayer and I will heal you', what did Hezekiah have to do to compel God's power to do what he said 'I will' i.e. to heal him. Christians worldwide believe in intercession; they do not see that as forcing/compelling God; they do not see the happening of that which they prayed for as something occurring by their own power or something they have made to happen --- but rather as something due to the divine grace of God. Even Jesus Christ Himself prayed 'thy will be done' ---- was He less on the earth than the so called "mature born again man"? |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 (of 198 pages)
)

where the person with the superior power will eventually subdue (maybe even kill) the other.