₦airaland Forum

Non politicians will think it's all about the people. It's all for personal interests. Maybe he has not been carried along or something.

qualityovenbake:
Nonsense! So the poor don't deserve electricity in Nigeria.

Read the whole thing. He is saying that a situation where the poor cannot have access to power supply must be addressed.

This man is very cool headed. I like him.

It's achievable. The government should focus on building a robust identity management scheme/database in addition to strengthening the BVN, TIN, SIM cards registration policies.

ladyn4real:
*20 GOOD REASONS WHY SUPREME COURT WILL REVERSE THE JUDGMENT OF IMO STATE.*

By Cyril Aririguzo, KSM

1. The Supreme Court as the apex court in Nigeria is bound by law, to reverse an obvious glaring error arising from forgery and 419 documentation in it's custody.

2. The court is aware of the consequences of leaving an indelible bad Judgement on it's neck as future case study.

3. Generality of Nigerians and those in diaspora are already crying foul and mounting serious pressure on the Supreme Court to do the right thing.

4. The International Communities are interested to see how the Supreme Court of Nigerian will promote rule of law by writing it's name in the annals of world history as the true promoter of democracy in Africa.

5. Other African countries who are learning from Nigeria political experiment are equally watching and I think the Court would not want to set up a bad precedence but rather exonorate itself from international ridicules.

6. INEC is denying knowledge of the 388 wards fake result sheets with is having more voters than number of registered voters.

7. The Supreme Court will now be thorough by going through every minute details of what gave rise to such a controversial judgement which include, the role the policeman involved, signatures, stamps used in perfecting the forgery.

8. The Supreme Court knows it doesn't allocate votes in any election and will be contradicting itself with this case for double standard. More so, when Governor Ihedioha is still leading with 43 votes with all that was added as votes in error for Uzodinma.

9. INEC is honourably in defense of it's constitutional role as an electoral umpire whose decision on the matter is germane for all clarifications. A policeman report cannot supercede that of INEC in electoral dispute.

10. Economically, the case is a setback to Nigeria and discouragement to foreign investment. So many investors are not willing to invest in a turbulent economy created by the case in Imo State.

11. The Supreme Court Judgement has created lots of confusion, lack of faith in the judiciary and the 7 Justices of Supreme already know what is at stake and wouldn't not want to be part of judgment that is without human conscience.

12. Imo people voted en mass for Governor Ihedioha and are witnesses to his good governance and for the Supreme Court to terminate such abruptly is an unholy force majeure, abberation and biased Judgement that does no one good. All the Supreme Court Justices already know this and they must surely reverse the case with honour.

13. A minority Judgement cannot stand a majority Judgement in any court of law talk-less of a Supreme Court. Ihedioha won in majority and that is his merit on the matter.

14. Uzodinma is not the APC flag-bearer in the 2019 governorship election courtesy of the 20 December, 2019 Supreme Court Judgement as already delivered.

15. Uche Nwosu is the authentic flag-bearer of APC in the said election as ruled in the 20 December, 2019. The case here is clear to all asundry. The Judiciary, legislature and INEC are in agreement to this Judgement.

16. The mathematical additions in the acclaimed 388 wards as votes for Uzodinma were not properly calculated and it did not tally with the total which showed errors. This is why the review will favour Governor Ihedioha. Also there is every indication that it was forged and it is assumed as a crime done in a hurry. The 7 Justices of the Supreme Court knows it is unjust and not tenable in any court of law not to talk of the Supreme Court of Nigeria.

17. Incredibly, Uzodinma had to manufacture votes from the blues believing he will force it on INEC but it was rejected and later turn around to persuade our Honourable Justices of Supreme court and Nigerians to believe him. Nigeria has come of age to believe such nonsense. Supreme court will reverse the judgement on Tuesday 18, February, 2020 on the merit of the case before it.

18. The 7 Justices of the Supreme Court are honourab

Your number one reason is the reason they cannot reverse the judgement cos you have to go through a fresh trial to prove beyond reasonable doubt that those results are forgeries and the supreme court is not a court of first instance.

AmazingELixir:
Do you even know what that term "Statue barred" actually mean and its applicability....on what bases is that the case with this particular matter...are you so daft that you don't know it's a review

You are in idiot . Is the review not a legal action?. Go and Google statute barred, Mumu.

Let's see how it plays out at the end.

Your opinion.

ifiokjohn:
And when they think the Judges didn't make mistake but instead aided cheatings and no longer have that trust/Confidence in those Judges to deliver fair and credible judgement. what you they do?

There is nothing anyone can do about that.

This case is supposed to be statue barred and time has elapsed.

Agboriotejoye:
Again a constitutional issue. The normal judicial procedure was concluded in sixty days. A review is not part of that matter.

"statute barred. Action, agreement, claim, obligation, or right that can no longer be the subject of a legal action because the time limit imposed by the limitations act (see statute of limitations) has been exceeded".

This review is a legal action.

Molutex:
They rejected nigerian brand but they will use nigeria currency to purchase the foreign cars. YEYECIOUSNESS

No, they reject Chinese crappy cars.

Camry's are not exotic cars, they are normal sedans. And you don't seriously expect them to buy an older version like 2005 or 2010. They have to buy the new one.

Agboriotejoye:
Engaging Kanu Agabi is a masterstroke by the PDP. He is in the league of Afe BBlolas and has the respect of any judge be it Tanko or odili. The issue of spread is a deal breaker. Hope is hopeless in this matter

Yes spread. But guess what, it's no use cos the supreme court no longer has jurisdiction as the 60 days allowed for this matter has elapsed.

Agboriotejoye:
Of course they do. Even with the initial figures. They need 1/4 in 5 LGs not 6 as oshiomole has been deceiving zombies

sure it's 5.3 which is 5.

fergie001:
IMO Review Panel

Justice Tanko Muhammad

Justice Sylvester Ngwuta

Justice Olukayode Ariwoola

Justice Kudirat Kekere Ekun

Justice Paul Galinje

Justice Amina Augie

Justice Uwani Abba Aji

The same panel that affirmed Uzodinma winner, excepting the fact that Justice Paul Adamu Galinje has replaced Justice Amiru Sanusi (who retired earlier this month)

Yes, that is because it's a review not an appeal. You cannot appeal a Supreme Court judgement. You can only apply for a review based on what you think are errors in the judgement.

ifiokjohn:
It isn't on their place to list Mary Odili...it is on the place of the APC. The PDP have listed who they don't want, and the court must obey cause that's what the Law states. you can't be a judge in your own case.

The purpose of the review is to bring to the notice of the Judges an error you think they made while delivering the Judgement so for you to say they have to go completely and a new set of judges assigned the case means it's no longer a review but an appeal of some sorts.

Bear in mind that you cannot appeal a Supreme Court judgement, you can only ask the Judges to review what they did by pointing out what you think is an error.

Ok

Small children o! Hmmm.

ifiokjohn:
You are making no point my guy. you are just supporting evil

Please tell me how I am supporting evil.

The PDP has listed several Judges that they don't want to see hearing their appeal but they didn't include Mary Odili. Someone married to a PDP bigwig and also from the same place as Ihedioha.

I think that is hypocrisy.

And it didn't occur to you to record a video of you doing whatever you were doing at the burial?

President2031:
You’re making useless point.


Pdp wrote a letter asking for tanko and others to step aside.

You foolishly rush to say but pdp want Justice marry odili to remain!

Did pdp ever wrote any letter saying Justice marry must be there?

Did pdp stop you from writing your own letter of you don’t feel comfortable with Justice marry Odilli?

Why do you rush to conclude foolishly?

Have you seen you have a very poor mentality? Do you think people form advance world reason like you on things like this?

How do you expect a country to grow with your type of people who forget about the message and attack the messenger?

Grow up!

If you have a brain as big as a peanut then you should understand that Mary Odili should also be on that stupid list. And since they didn't add her to the list, it means that they would rather like her to be part of those to hear the case.

Small child like you telling me to grow up.

SarkinYarki:
Zombies will not like this ooo...who God don bless he don bless

God blessed him with constituency allowances, while the constituents lack health centres, class room blocks, boreholes etc. God is good.

President2031:
Mumu if you have any problem write your own letter too.

Some of you Nigerians your mentality is too poor.

Really? You are the one who's so mentally retarded you can't see the point I'm making.

obidr:
May you and your future generations have that kind of sound judgement for the rest of their lives. Amen.

Rubbish. If you have nothing to say, just shut up.

VirginSearcher:
Shut up! Are u supporting the robbery in Imo to stand? I don't know whats wrong with u guys

What robbery? The judgement was sound.

Hmmm. It seems a very solid structure.

But they would like Mary Odili who hails from Mbise and is Married to Peter Odili on the case right? Bunch of hypocrites.

What does he have to say? Warped fables for his freakishly stupid minions.

Very few sane minds on this forum.

Amaechi said he was not in Kaduna and you are insisting he was there cos your brother told you so. Madam check your brain.

See you ranting about something you didn't witness.