₦airaland Forum

History555:
Wonderful. The same news is not on daily trust but on nairaland it is attributed to daily trust. Well nairaland needstl traffic badly and only news about lgbos can do that. That's why i urge lgbos to begin to boycott nairaland

Barbsamiin:
We dont want anything hazardous, we need safe environment please!

Barbsamiin:
So nuclear explossion is an imagination?

where were you when uranium explossion hit lebanon just recently?

Any slight mistake + carelessness of our nigerian people 'll cause massive death if not all, you'll just die without knowing what kills you.

Our lives matter.

Pelecius:
“This isn't the "best of science" this is literally creation "science" which is a pseudoscience…”
You are really just funny. Does known laws of Physics and Chemistry or even Mathematics change because the Bible is involved (excluding miracles)? If yes, how? If no, then why do you call it pseudoscience? (please, my argument is on use of the principles of scientific laws in case you want to attack strawman)

“The Leicester study determined that it would float in theory, did they determine that it would be a stable vessel for 100+ days of intense floods?”
That is arguing from silence. They didn’t say it won’t be stable in such flood, what they calculated was it’s buoyancy. So, it is still begging the question. Again, why do you expect a God hater to do research on Noah’s Ark? What do you think would happen if his results are to agree with the works done by Bible believing Scientist? Do you even know the censorship that happens in academia, that works which give credence to creation will NEVER be allowed to pass through secular peer reviewed journals, no matter the evidence?

You can check this link
http://newgeology.us/presentation48.html

You said attempt to create such from wooden materials have failed but what did Ken Ham used though he built it more like a house.
“This isn't even a taking into account the many inaccuracies of the story like how the animals behaved, fed, maintained their temperature and stopped themselves from killing each other.”
You need to be informed on creationist literature so as not to be repeating stale and refuted claims.

How is me thinking I am smart related to you not seeing acknowledgment in a paper that I sent to you to READ. You are just funny.
Again, how does who sponsors change the laws of nature that was used in a research work? Of course, you are smart

I have talked about those so called evidence before and that those resistance is usually attributed to loss of function which make it difficult for the bacteria to bind to the antibiotic, hence becoming resistant. But no new feature is formed as evolutionist would want us to believe.

As for the peppered moths, though serious work has been done (in desperate attempt) to save the errors that genetics have shown on how the initial evolutionary story has issues. But this work eventually shows that there is a mutation which is responsible for the difference in coloration of the wings of the two moth types and not the initial story of industrial melanism. This only shows that it is more of a variation between the gene pool in peppered moths and has nothing to do with how a peppered moth should change to another insect or later, gradually become human over millions of years.
Fossil record was actually interpreted to fit the evolutionary paradigm. Creationists also interpreted it to fit the creation/flood model. So, bias is into play here and not hard science. The same data, different interpretation which all fits the different paradigms. It even get worse for evolutionist whenever you get a fossil in a strata that is millions of years older than that of another organism that is supposed to be its ancestor. Funny right? You won’t see such reports

Pelecius:
You are really funny.
My problem with NL atheists is that they are so fond of changing goal posts, committing red herring fallacy whenever they are caught with misinformation.
I gave that long response to what I bolded in your comment which was “Noah's ark is physically impossible and has been proven to not be a stable vessel ironically by Ken Ham himself…”

“You are using answers in genesis and creation ministries which are sites dedicated to upholding biblical myths as your idea of an unbiased source”
I was expecting this anyway which was why I added the work by some scientist from Leicester University. You wouldn’t tell me that you didn’t see that (except that you did not check the link which is not an excuse), but the use of misinformation to prove your point is a common trait among many God haters
Again, I didn’t use answers in Genesis to prove it’s stability. I exposed your misinformation about Ken Ham and I used his website to prove it.
The ark replica was not built to really be like a ship but like a house, hence the need for scaffolds. If you had checked the link, you wouldn’t make this blunder again.
I really doubt if you actually went through the paper in the first place for saying it is full of shit. Typical of folks like you who would ridicule the best of science just because it lends support to the Bible. These are men that are qualified and armed with the knowledge of ship building and naval architecture. So it doesn’t matter if creation ministries got permission from them to post their work on her site.
As for the Youtube link, I would love that you heed the Biblical wisdom from Proverbs 18:17 which says
“he who states his case first seems right, until his rival comes and cross-examines him”.
Though, life debate may seem to short to refute his cases, most have been refuted long before the debate and the omissions where added.

Folks like you may not bother to check even if you were shown where to study in-depth and make your objective conclusion, rather, you feed on misinformation and spread it.
I decided to answer your misinformation again even when you already shifted the goal post since you were not able to retract your misinformation.

Acknowledgement
This work was fully supported by the Korea Association of Creation Research.

That was the purpose of my response and I don’t need to attend to your bait and switch tactic of talking about bacteria resistance or peppered moths of fossil record because someone already took you on concerning that, but you employed NL atheists best weapon – red herring

Barbsamiin:
Do you want another hiroshima nagasaka in nigeria again?

Barbsamiin:
Do you like nuclear plant to be sited near your village?

Pelecius:
That caught my attention. Even without going to check yet, I know that it is a misinformation. How would one who has dedicated his entire career on proving that Genesis account is to be taken literally and true will now prove that the one of the most important stuff - Noah's flood and Ark is not stable? How did he spend so much resources in producing a replica of that ark if he does not believe it to be stable?
This is from his site. You may do well to check it (not just to rely on one sided story?)
https://answersingenesis.org/creation-vacations/ark-encounter/

About it's stability, there's an excellent work some by staff of the Korea Research Institute of Ships and Engineering, Taejon. This their abstract

"In this study, the safety of Noah’s Ark in the severe environments imposed by waves and winds during the Genesis Flood was investigated. Three major safety parameters—structural safety, overturning stability, and seakeeping quality—were evaluated altogether to assess the safety of the whole system.

The concept of ‘relative safety’, which is defined as the relative superiority in safety compared to other hull forms, was introduced and 12 different hull forms with the same displacement were generated for this purpose. Evaluation of these three safety parameters was performed using analytical tools. Model tests using 1/50 scaled models of a prototype were performed for three typical hull forms in order to validate the theoretical analysis.

Total safety index, defined as the weighted average of three relative safety performances, showed that the Ark had a superior level of safety in high winds and waves compared with the other hull forms studied. The voyage limit of the Ark, estimated on the basis of modern passenger ships, criteria, revealed that it could have navigated through waves higher than 30 metres."
The full work, translated in English is found here
https://creation.com/safety-investigation-of-noahs-ark-in-a-seaway
This is from another independent group of Scientists in where their calculations led them to conclude that the dimension of the ark would allow about 70,000 animals conveniently without capsizing. Here is what one of them said
"You don’t think of the Bible necessarily as a scientifically accurate source of information, so I guess we were quite surprised when we discovered it would work. We’re not proving that it’s true, but the concept would definitely work."
The article is found here
https://www.businessinsider.com/scientists-noahs-arc-would-have-floated-with-70000-animals-if-built-by-dimensions-in-the-bible-2014-4?IR=T

We don't need to allow emotions lead us in making misinformation. There are questions that doesn't have answers but it does not mean that many God haters should resort to lying just to prove their points

Eriokanmi:
I need you to teach me how evolution changed gorilla to man later due to adaptation and environmental changes but same doesn't work on gorillas transported from Nigeria to North America centuries ago but remained gorilas dispite the environmental changes and adaptation. Also,
I need you to teach me why slaves ferried across the Atlantic gave birth from one generation up to the 6th one as we have in the present day america but never had pointed nose or light skin in spite of adaptation and environmental changes. I'm waiting

Eriokanmi:
im a scientist. I didn't ask you to define evolution. I said teach me

Eriokanmi:
Please can you teach me what evolution is?

Parisian:
Trash....

How does the nonsense you posted prove that humans came from fish?
Or that a bird can evolve completely to become a dog?

How could any human have witnessed the bolded when there were no other humans and the only human (Adam) was deep asleep when the incident occurred? Don't you think?

Sodom and Gomorrah as depicted in the Bible has been found with sulfur everyone just as the Bible said. Go there and see it for yourself doubting Thomas.

How possible if that such place exists and 100% matches biblical descriptions...or you'd call that a mere coincidence? LMAO..

At the depths of the red Sea, the chariots of the king pharoah's men have been unearthed and also dates back to the exact period in history as stated in the Bible...that is a coincidence too?

Parisian:
Please when and where have we insulted science? Us Christians are not like Muslims that say the Earth is flat.

That said, you should know that science validates Christianity, not the opposite.

We believe that God has bestowed knowledge upon man to be able to reveal certain things and make certain discoveries.

Know the difference between science and pseudoscience. Evolution (macro) for example is pseudoscience as it has absolutely no basis nor facts backing its claims.

Ask yourself which is more believable? To say that the big bang happened millions years ago (non-life giving rise to life which is unscientific) or actually unearthing relics to show that an ancient palace existed ( which is in line with not only religious text but lots of historical texts as well).

Parisian:
Yeah, tell me how well you understand a phenomenon that no single human has experienced in all of human history, not even the scientists that propounded it.

Eriokanmi:
did the bible say man existed million of years ago? No. Did I say the bible say so in my comment? No! Go and read the bible and stop the blind criticism it won't do you any good. Man or animal existence isn't up to even 100k years ago talkless of millions of years of existence. The bible is factual and veritable. Go to today's turkey and see sites of most of those events as recorded in the bible. Most of the towns where the events took place are still there as relics

Eriokanmi:
its because man didn't exist as far back ad millions of years ago as wrongly posited. Were the archaeologists there millions of years ago? Who made the instrument used in calculating those fake years? Is it not man? The same instrument that would predict rainfall but rain would never fall? Farmine but it won't happen
Same people who sold the theory of evolution to us but in our time, monkeys or chimps never evolve to man as we always see them around. Some gorillas lived up to 50 years under close supervision but never evolved to homo abilis or homo sapiens and man has never transformed into something else. All what was recorded in the bible are factual and veritable.

Ayokequeen:
Why are you in so much pain as to what some people believe, since the time you've been wandering around in your head knowledge how far have you gone? You're saying trash about the belief of some people who are greater than the greatest of your grand parents. When did you get to this world that you suddenly become so wise and omniscient. Guess you're lost and confused, better retrace your step and find the way.

Lady16:
I helped him carried his bag

Caleb17:
Nigerian Doctors are very selfish set of people... Always feeling entitled... Rubbish

TheRedpillguy:
Tha is a lie, sometimes these women even start these fights, she should tell us what the mum did. The man is not mad, he can't just be beating up people. Its a lie. Tell us how it all started.

Crenzywilliams:
I deeply have a problem with abusive men, I strongly opposed the abuse of anyone, girl, boy, woman or man by anyone.. that said, I strongly believe bringing such sensitive and private family issues to social media is really wrong. There's the place of the extended family, religious heads and if it's still not handled properly to the traditional ruler. Bringing her dad here is only going to create more enemity and hate in that family. Not everything should be brought to social media. The internet never forgets.

Commonsense99:

Whenever you see a Nigerian Nigg@ arean as the caption, be rest assured its a Biafran... If it was crime these urchins would have used his name or tribe a refference.

MelesZenawi:
They threw away their fathers name just to be like Europe but still they don't behave like europeans..

Are there militants in london?

but u will find many here.