₦airaland Forum

IjeBos:
Put everything you wrote in google. Instead of watching the edited video, watch the full video (there is a full video of that incident). Instead of reading a clip or someone's opinion of the lawsuit, read the lawsuit that was filed. Instead of reading a clip of a judicial opinion. Read the opinion yourself. I promise when you do, you'll understand how the truth doesn't match up to what you wrote here or what you believe.

FYI: Any lawsuit has to meet a threshold question. I can't just sue you and ask the court for some relief because I believe something. I have to come into court with evidence or proof that there is harm and that the court can/is allowed to provide relief for that harm, if they can't the cases are dismissed. Listen to some of the hearings (some have been released). Some are actually funny in the ridiculousness of the Trump lawyers.

I did not watch the edited video, I saw the live hearing where the video was presented. The video is over 2 hours long as its was a live recording.so tell me what edits did they make? did u not see the woman in the video? did u not see a video of her and her daughter stealing a usb device? or you will claim that was edited too.
All the cases were not thrown out cos of evidence, they were cos of standing, timing etc. NONE of the courts agreed to hear their case. its a fact

LordReed:
In the ranking of who to trust in this matter, I would rate the SoS who happens to be a Republican, higher than people on the Internet who are alleging a conspiracy after viewing an edited video.



Oh the report from the so called Allied Security Operations Group, a company with no known qualifications or previous clients. Read the SoS response under oath here:

https://www.michigan.gov/documents/ag/SOS_Benson_Response_Antrim_County_710474_7.pdf



Yes, I expect that any case alleging fraud would have that allegation front and center. In a court of law there is nothing like indirectly, either there was or there wasn't any fraud and you are either trying the case for fraud or not. Also alleging that there are irregularities doesn't equal alleging fraud, irregularities and fraud are not the same.



The suit was withdrawn by the same people who brought it. Whatever it was about is now moot.



I asked you to state the cases that were alleging fraud and I pointed out to you that the President's lawyer did not allege fraud. If they were out to prove fraud where are the cases doing so?

the 2 cases i quoted are still in court. they have not been withdrawn.
I would not trust any politician especially a rino. So you expect the SOS to claim there was fraud? Why cnt they agree to share their data with the public? Why are they?
Why did the counting stop when trump was in the lead? why did they have more adjudicated ballots than correctly filled ones?
You know the truth.
Show me proof that the fraud video was edited, hundreds of people under oath have testified that the witnessed fraud, there is video evidence yet you claim its false. Why do you suppress the truth because of ideology. So you trust a politician over your average citizen.

Hope you know its not only trump's lawyers suing the state, private people are doing so too. Trumps cases in court are not up to 15. I repeat again, the courts never heard the cases, so there was no chance to present any evidence. the cases were dismissed before they were heard. All the cases are pointing to fraud and they have not has the chance to present their evidence.

LordReed:
The video was debunked by the SoS of Georgia after they reviewed the full video tape.



Yes its the one. The officials who did the audit certified that the Dominion machines were accurate and didn't switch any votes.



Not a suit alleging fraud.



Also not a suit alleging fraud.




A suit alleging fraud that the plaintiffs themselves voluntarily withdraw.



The courts adjudicate based on the law, your personal sense of fairness is irrelevant.

I can't believe what you posted. You believe a politician over what you see? Did u watch the video? Did it seem normal? Judge for yourself dont rely on others to make the judgement for you. In the video you saw ruby freeman asking people to leave for the night, then later they start pulling boxes from under the table to count without supervision. And just cos the secretary of state says " nothing to see here" does not mean u should not critically analyse the video you saw. Never trust a politician.

That's not true. The report said the machines were compromised. I have the report. And i have attached to this post.

All the suits i posted you claim they are not alleging fraud. Why did they then take the case to court. Are you expecting to see the word fraud in the case title?.
The lin wood case challenges the inclusion of absentee ballots in Georgia and wants to prohibit result certification. This indirectly accuses fraud.

The Johnson case asks them to block certification until an independent audit is done. Also they want an investigation to be done on claims of voter fraud in wayne County. This case is also about voter fraud.

So i do not know where u found the info that they did not allege fraud in their suits. The issue is that the courts never gave them a chance to prove their case. They were thrown out not cos of evidence

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RJ6TWPa0-OQOo2_SrYpCewJ0-Zl1IpVF/view?usp=sharing

LordReed:
Yes debunked, not by fact checkers but the very people involved.

The Antrim County audit gave Trump an additional 12, TWELVE votes. How is that evidence of massive fraud?

I repeat which law suit was alleging fraud?

Show me the video where ruby freeman debunked the video. Its illegal to count votes with no one in the room.

The Antrim County audit of the dominion machines. That's the one i am talking about.

Lin Wood vs Raffensperger
Brooks vs Mahoney
Johnson vs Benson.
These are some lawsuits. Some have been dismissed not because of evidence. None of the evidence have been seen by any court. The courts throw them out as soon as its filed. That is not right. If the courts were fair, let both parties come before it and argue the case with both sides presenting their evidence

LordReed:
The Texas lawsuit was not a fraud suit either. Can you mention which suit in particular was alleging fraud?

All the so called video evidence has been thoroughly debunked.

LOL, debunked? did u watch the videos and make your own judgement or u had people -"fact checkers" do it for you? Why were they going to court if they had no intention of proving fraud?. Did you see the Antrim county audit report?. There was fraud, watch and make your own judgement, don't rely on people with an agenda to make decisions for you.
Watch the Georgia testimonies , even analysts who have access to the data finding fault in it.
The 5 states in question pausing vote count at the same time and resuming counting with different results.

LordReed:
Rudi Guiliani the President's very own lawyer went to court and said this is not a case of fraud so what are you on about?

That's just one case what about the rest? . The Texas law suite, the Supreme Court threw it out cos of standing not even looking at any of the claims.
Based on what you have seen am sure u can't deny voter fraud. All the Ruby Freeman videos, the Georgia and Arizona testimonies.

Goke7:
BBC is reporting it too so what's your problem

BBC is crap too. Moist people in the UK dont like them

dragunov:
So why didn't those "evidences" fly in his several court challenges? Why didn't Bill Barr confirm those proofs? See, I don't know what you conspiracy theorists stand to gain from projecting alternate realities. This guy lost the election gallantly. Accept it and move on.

So video proof is now conspiracy? Stop relying on MSM, judge by your self. None of the courts listened to the cases, the cases were thrown out cos of standing not cos of the evidence. The evidence is there if you are honest you cant deny it

dragunov:
FarahYudeedn't. It is only you who is privy to that knowledge. But we are waiting for you to provide evidence. Concrete evidence that no US and republican officials have seen except you.

you seem to have missed the ballots under the table video or the or the shredding video or the USB video

Uyigue12:
ur always here to quote verses with sermon I ask you now ! Are you that holy as you claim Or just a fellow hypocrite

Holiness via Jesus Christ am sure you can't contest that

Dottmann655:
We are their major patrons na

Try USA

Kelvinhunta:
You are just avoiding the point! You criticizing the citizens but you avoid criticizing the government while I was trying to redirect you to start by criticizing the government first. We already know that the government is from the citizen you either criticize both starting from the government or you stay mute. Youths are taking over and I guarantee you that

Both parties have their faults. I am not exonorating anyone. The politicians take advantage of people and the citizens most times are gullible.
Knowledge and wisdom is key in this situation. The youth boasts of strength, the old boasts of wisdom. In the Nigerian situation you need the two.

Kelvinhunta:
Thank God u said in civilized countries so how do you want us to be like civilized countries when our government aren't civilized enough? You see regular fights in Senate, house of reps etc and u won't motivate them to be civilized enough but when u see youth you turn to a motivational speaker Abi? Bros fear God na

The truth is all human beings are the same its just the severity of "baddness" that defers. The government you criticize is made up of people who were regular citizens like you and I. The nigerian government is just a reflection of her citizenry.

Okuda:
it is not irresponsible as long as people's properties are safe and lifes' are at no risk. You are the kind of person that feels ok with the status Quo and dont want anybody to disturb your daily business. Not like you are ok with the status quo per say but you dont care enough to do something about it. Hence, it gets you angry that people are distubring you with theirs. You my friend are one of the lazy youth Buhari was talking about. them dey protest for developed countries and trams and buses always arrive late because they cannot pass. Its a disturbance but the police does not do anything to them because they are exercising their right to expression. Blocking the road is apt because during a protest space is needed to freely march and thousands, if not millions would not do it on the walkway or hang in the air, it has to be on the road.

In civilized countries,they protest but they do not inconvenience others, they face the people the protest is intended for not people who are going about their daily business.
The case of lagos and blocking roads who will be responsible if an ambulance or fire trucks is stuck in traffic?
Your right to free expression does not include infringing on the rights of others.

Okuda:
you dont know the meaning of protest? it means shut down the economy in whatever way you can because just coming out in numbers to shout does not really send the correct message to the right people esoecially the ones who have ear problem

In which dictionary does protesting means shutting down the economy, there are government offices all over, people can go and protest there. Governments do not reside on major or minor roads. Its irresponsible to put others at risk because you are making a point. You are no different from your oppressors.

protests:
See child rights activists. Go and take her pikin away now.

She is safeguarding the future of her child, so that she will grow up in a future free of stray bullet, SARS, police brutality, LAWMA harassment, LASTMA harassment, and such 'Uniform harassment'.

Utopian future right?

Originalsly:
This one is serious...... really need more people.... and they should come prepared to battle Police. Whatever happens here..... would draw international attention.

No country has Nigeria's time now, they are focused on their pandemic

Wrong grammar "beaten" or "beating"

Realismailakabir:
In the name of Allah, the Gracious, the Merciful. Praise be to Allah, the Lord of the worlds. I bear witness that there is no
one worthy of worship except Him. I testify that Muhammad ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ is his Messanger.

As a muslim we need to know Allah before serving him, if we dont know him how can we serve him? It's our duty to learn about him. It is in Hadith Qudsi where Allah says "Know Me before you worship Me, if you do not know Me,how would you worship Me?"

These are some of the important things you need to know about Allah.

1) he knows everything: Q.6:59

And with Him are the keys of the unseen; none knows them except Him. And He knows what is on the land and in the sea. Not a leaf falls but that He knows it. And no grain is there within the darknesses of the earth and no moist or dry [thing] but that it is [written] in a clear record.

“Unquestionably, to Allah belongs whatever is in the heavens and earth. Already He knows that upon which you [stand] and [knows] the Day when they will be returned to Him and He will inform them of what they have done. And Allah is Knowing of all things

2) He is so merciful: Q.6.12

Say, "To whom belongs whatever is in the heavens and earth?" Say, "To Allah ." He has decreed upon Himself mercy. He will surely assemble you for the Day of Resurrection, about which there is no doubt. Those who will lose themselves [that Day] do not believe.

3) He is a forgiver Q.39.53

Say, "O My servants who have transgressed against themselves [by sinning], do not despair of the mercy of Allah . Indeed, Allah forgives all sins. Indeed, it is He who is the Forgiving, the Merciful."

4 ) his punishment is severe Q.5.98

"Know that Allah is severe in
penalty and that Allah is Forgiving and Merciful"

Q3.56
" And as for those who disbelieved, I will punish them with a severe punishment in this world and the Hereafter, and they will have no helpers."

5 he s a promise keeper: Q15.9

"Indeed, it is We who sent down the Qur'an and indeed, We will be its guardian"

6 he is swift in accounting 6.62

"Then they His servants are returned to Allah, their true Lord. Unquestionably, His is the judgement, and He is the swiftest of accountants"

Q2.202

"Those will have a share of what they have earned, and Allah is swift in account"

Conclusion:
We have to fear He who knows everything about us, and will bring us to book by the morrow(hereafter) and to know more about attributes of Allah check 99 names of Allah.

7. He has 2 arms on one side of his body

Realismailakabir:
https://islamqa.info/en/answers/111938/ruling-on-committing-suicide-because-of-depression

I remember when the prophet's mentor died and he wanted to commit suicide cos of depression. So much for a man of God

Realismailakabir:
Keith L. Moore

Professor Emeritus, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Toronto.

He was amazed by the accuracy of the statements made in the Quran in the 7th century. Statements about embryology. Before anyone knew anything about it. These statements in the Quran could not be based on scientific knowledge of the time so it must have come from God. 

Q.23:12

وَلَقَدْ خَلَقْنَا ٱلْإِنسَٰنَ مِن سُلَٰلَةٍ مِّن طِينٍ

And certainly did We create man from an extract of clay.
Q.23:13

ثُمَّ جَعَلْنَٰهُ نُطْفَةً فِى قَرَارٍ مَّكِينٍ

Then We placed him as a sperm-drop in a firm lodging.

Q.23:14

ثُمَّ خَلَقْنَا ٱلنُّطْفَةَ عَلَقَةً فَخَلَقْنَا ٱلْعَلَقَةَ مُضْغَةً فَخَلَقْنَا ٱلْمُضْغَةَ عِظَٰمًا فَكَسَوْنَا ٱلْعِظَٰمَ لَحْمًا ثُمَّ أَنشَأْنَٰهُ خَلْقًا ءَاخَرَۚ فَتَبَارَكَ ٱللَّهُ أَحْسَنُ ٱلْخَٰلِقِينَ


Then We made the sperm-drop into a clinging clot, and We made the clot into a lump [of flesh], and We made [from] the lump, bones, and We covered the bones with flesh; then We developed him into another creation. So blessed is Allah, the best of creators.

Q.23:15

ثُمَّ إِنَّكُم بَعْدَ ذَٰلِكَ لَمَيِّتُونَ

Then indeed, after that you are to die.


Q.23:16
ثُمَّ إِنَّكُمْ يَوْمَ ٱلْقِيَٰمَةِ تُبْعَثُونَ

Then indeed you, on the Day of Resurrection, will be resurrected.


E. Marshall Johnson

Professor and Chairman of the Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, and Director of the Daniel Baugh Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

He also talked about embryology in the Quran. He said that Prophet Muhammad must have got this info from some source and that he has no issues that it came from God. 

T.V.N. Persaud

Professor of Anatomy, and Professor of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

He said for a man to make such profound statements about science in the seventh century is amazing. He said it could not be mere chance. 

Joe Leigh Simpson

Professor and Chairman of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

He said he sees no conflict between genetics and Islam. He said Islam could guide science. He said the knowledge in the Quran is from God. 

Gerald C. Goeringer

Professor and Co-ordinator of Medical Embryology in the Department of Cell Biology, School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington DC, USA.

He said the Koran described human development and commingling of the gametes through organogenesis. He said nothing in history has seen such a feat besides current day science. 

Alfred Kroner

Professor of the Department of Geosciences, University of Mainz, Germany.

He talked about the origin of the universe and how it would be impossible for a man like Prophet Muhammad to know about this from his own mind. He said science today proves what the prophet said 1400 years ago. 

Yushidi Kusan

Director of the Tokyo Observatory, Tokyo, Japan.

He talks about astronomy and using telescopes. He said that the Quran has true facts about astronomy. 

Professor Armstrong

Professor Armstrong works for NASA and is also Professor of Astronomy, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.

He was amazed by what the Quran says about astronomy and how the ancient writing of the Quran agrees with modern science today. 

William Hay

Professor of Oceanography, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA.

He was very interested how this information in the Quran could have this science in it and that it must be from God. 

Durja Rao

Professor of Marine Geology teaching at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

He said that the Quran could not be simple human knowledge and must be from a Supernatural Force. 

Professor Siaveda

Professor of Marine Geology, Japan.

He said the Quran is almost unbelievable and a very remarkablebook. 

Tejatat Tejasen

Chairman of the Department of Anatomy and is the former Dean of the faculty of Medicine, University of Chiang Mai, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

He said all the facts of science in the Quran can be scientifically proventoday. 

Maurice Bucaille

Born in 1920, former chief of the Surgical Clinic, University of Paris, has for a long time deeply interested in the correspondences between the teachings of the Holy Scriptures and modern secular knowledge.

He said it is impossible to explain how a book produced at the time of prophet Muhammad could contain ideas that have only been discovered today. How could a man know these facts without the slightest of error

https://untoislam.com/scientist-converts-to-islam

Keith Moore did not convert to islam

AntiChristian:
Numbers
Chapter 31
7-12
7 And they warred against the Midianites, as the LORD commanded Moses; and they slew all the males. 8 And they slew the kings of Midian, beside the rest of them that were slain; namely, Evi, and Rekem, and Zur, and Hur, and Reba, five kings of Midian: Balaam also the son of Beor they slew with the sword. 9 And the children of Israel took all the women of Midian captives, and their little ones, and took the spoil of all their cattle, and all their flocks, and all their goods. 10 And they burnt all their cities wherein they dwelt, and all their goodly castles, with fire. 11 And they took all the spoil, and all the prey, both of men and of beasts. 12 And they brought the captives, and the prey, and the spoil, unto Moses, and Eleazar the priest, and unto the congregation of the children of Israel, unto the camp at the plains of Moab, which are by Jordan near Jericho.

17-18
17 Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. 18 But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves

What is the need of all this killings if not because they failed to obey God's commandments?

If God knew they won't ba able to fulfil the commandments then why did He kill/enslave them?

The law was given to Moses and the Israelites not to the midianities.
There was a reason for the war and all the. I will explain

AntiChristian:
l
Why then did God ordered all those killings from Moses, Joshua and others?

explain a little more, i do not understand your question

AntiChristian:
1. Was God aware that humans can't fulfil the commandments? Give verses as proofs.

2. What then is the essence of a commandment if it can't be fulfilled?

3. Which law giver ever gives law that he expects would never be fulfilled?

God was aware no one could fulfill the commandments, that was why he gave room for sacrifice. The commandments were not given to be fullfiled, they were given to show man his limits so he can place his trust in God.
In Hosea 6:6
For I desire mercy, not sacrifice, and the knowledge of God rather than burnt offerings.

this verse shows God is interested in us knowing him, receiving his mercy (via his son) not sacrifice etc as a result of not obeying the law.

Man has always been full of himself, virtue signalling, making himself the guardian of morality comparing sins etc. So God who is the real moral guardian steps in and gives the laws; something he knows man is incapable of achieving.

An example is
Lamach comparing sins in the old testament

I have killed a man for wounding me, a young man for striking me. If Cain’s revenge is sevenfold, then Lamech’s is seventy-sevenfold’” (Gen. 4:23–24).

so without an unattainable standard every man will think he is better than the other. Only God saves and he did this via his son, so no man will be able to boast in himself of how good he is cos there is no one good but God (Mark 10 vs 18). God is his goodness sent salvation his own way which is easier than trying to obey laws. Its only pride that stands in the way of man , making him think he can save himself.

jamad1612:
AhuzubiLah minna shaitoni rojim, bismilLah Rahmoni Roheem. No, the holy prophet Muhammad (SAW) did not rape Aisha nor did he rape anyone. Aisha was alive many years after the Holy prophet passed away and she was always telling people of the beautiful moments she shared with the prophet Muhammad (SAW). She was also the prophet's beloved wife.

He married her as a child

AntiChristian:
Ah! When did you become a liar? How many commandments did Jesus mentioned that can't be fulfilled?
How many Christians in Nigeria can give all their properties to the poor and follow Jesus? Are your pastors not among the richest in the world?

Which Bible verse did God say no man can fulfill the commandments He gave?

I expect a civil conversation.
If people could fulfill the commandments why did God create room for sacrifice.
The point Jesus was making is that he cannot fulfil the commandments. That he broke the first 2. No one can fulfill the commandments. They were given to show u Gods standard and how you cannot live to it, so you have to depend on him (God) via Jesus.

orunto27:
.




Thank You OLODUMARE. FOR OKO MEANS PRICK: HOE: FARM: HUSBAND ETCETERA ETCETERA.

English and Yoruba are not the same semantically, you can't compare

AntiChristian:
Don't go there.

Even Jesus told someone to obey the commandment. Are you saying Jesus was mistaken here telling someone to obey the commandments? The man was able to fulfil the commandment then Jesus gave him more tasks...

From Luke 18:18-22 and Matthew 19:16-22
A certain ruler asked him, "Good teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?"
Why do you call me good?" Jesus answered. "No one is good--except God alone.
You know the commandments: ‘Do not commit adultery, do not murder, do not steal, do not bear false witness, honor your father and mother.’” 21“All these have I kept from my youth,” he said. 22On hearing this, Jesus told him, “You still lack one thing: Sell everything you own and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow Me.”…

Matt. 19:16-22, “And behold, one came to Him and said, “Teacher, what good thing shall I do that I may obtain eternal life?” 17 And He said to him, “Why are you asking Me about what is good? There is only One who is good; but if you wish to enter into life, keep the commandments.” 18 He said to Him, “Which ones?” And Jesus said, “You shall not commit murder; You shall not commit adultery; You shall not steal; You shall not bear false witness; 19 Honor your father and mother; and You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” 20 The young man said to Him, “All these things I have kept; what am I still lacking?” 21 Jesus said to him, “If you wish to be complete, go and sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you shall have treasure in heaven; and come, follow Me.”

Jesus was only showing how he was not telling the truth, he claimed he obeyed all he commandments, but he missed the first 2 by placing money above God and also having money as an idol. No one can fulfill the commandments, that is why there was a system to cover sins until Jesus came.

The man asked what he was lacking, Jesus said "follow me". So following Jesus is the real deal.

AntiChristian:
Don't go there.

Even Jesus told someone to obey the commandment. Are you saying Jesus was mistaken here telling someone to obey the commandments? The man was able to fulfil the commandment then Jesus gave him more tasks...

From Luke 18:18-22 and Matthew 19:16-22
A certain ruler asked him, "Good teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?"
Why do you call me good?" Jesus answered. "No one is good--except God alone.
You know the commandments: ‘Do not commit adultery, do not murder, do not steal, do not bear false witness, honor your father and mother.’” 21“All these have I kept from my youth,” he said. 22On hearing this, Jesus told him, “You still lack one thing: Sell everything you own and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow Me.”…

Matt. 19:16-22, “And behold, one came to Him and said, “Teacher, what good thing shall I do that I may obtain eternal life?” 17 And He said to him, “Why are you asking Me about what is good? There is only One who is good; but if you wish to enter into life, keep the commandments.” 18 He said to Him, “Which ones?” And Jesus said, “You shall not commit murder; You shall not commit adultery; You shall not steal; You shall not bear false witness; 19 Honor your father and mother; and You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” 20 The young man said to Him, “All these things I have kept; what am I still lacking?” 21 Jesus said to him, “If you wish to be complete, go and sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you shall have treasure in heaven; and come, follow Me.”

You are back for some abi. Ok

Ajengogo:
Salaam alaikum brothers and sisters.

I have a wife of around 11 years of marriage with children who has suddenly lost interest in sexual intercourse. She is submissive in several other aspects but when it comes to issue of sex, she loathes it like hell. She developed this feeling all of a sudden.

I have tried to engage her on this, but she wouldn't talk straight about this issue. She gives flimsy excuses always. We have even separated from our bed for several weeks now on this account, to see whether she will start developing the feeling all to no avail. I have told her that it could be jinn, she debunked it and refused to embark on the prayers. I am praying seriously about this. But she doesn't look concerned

At this stage, what exactly am I supposed to do. I don't want to marry another wife, and I don't want to be involved in extramarital affairs

Its no jinn. Its more psychological.

AntiChristian:
is this all you preach? Have you ever told anyone to fulfill the commandments before?

The commandments were not given to be fulfilled cos u cnt. It was to show your unworthiness

Janosky:
Open 1 John 5:7 in the KJV Bible and then other translations.

See the notorious fraud below:

King James Bible
For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.

New International Version
For there are three that testify:

New Living Translation
So we have these three witnesses—

English Standard Version
For there are three that testify:

Berean Study Bible
For there are three that testify:

Berean Literal Bible
For there are three bearing testimony:

New American Standard Bible
For there are three that testify:

Clarke's Commentary on the Bible says it is likely this verse is not genuine

The KJV version "bear record in heaven, the Father, the word and the holy ghost" is radically different from other Bible translations.
It is a FRAUD , the evidence abounds.

Bros Fortran, No dey DECEIVE yourself

its been answered already by SonOfALion