₦airaland Forum

Kursk is the biggest gift Ukro nazis gave Russia in the war. In their foolishness, they brought their best troops that Putin has been seeking to destroy right to him. The icing on the cake is that he can choose anytime he wants to destroy them. They are trapped like mice in the tomato can. Very soon Kursk will be 'insignificant ' to the western media.

Ojiofor:
Ukraine have lost over 50% of land they occupied Kursk and will be kicked out very soon.
Russia is destroying Ukraine best soldiers in Kusk.

They don't need to be in a hurry. The Ukrainian troops in Kursk know the fate that awaits them. They are dying daily like flies as Russia has them surrounded and the territory gets thinner.

Botragelad:
Same way no amount of Russia power can bring back Kursk region occupied by Ukraine! 😂😂😂

Cry about it, boy!

Just like leopard tanks in Ukraine abi? How is it going in Pokrovsk for the Ukrainians. Is it true that Kupiansk is now surrounded?

obedience4:
Freaky 😔😔

You keep going in circles, drones are like the easiest things to shoot down..they are slow than normal manned vehicles, Prone to signal jamming, have no anti-air counter measure like flares etc.

The question is this, how does US drones shutdown in Yemen relates to the US dorminating a field??
Its like saying just because Russia overhyped tanks are being turn to scrapmetal by portable anti tanks weapons like the javelin in Ukraine, does that means Russia isn't the best at producing vodka??

Drones and being the best in AI do they correlate to you

They are being attacked by their friends.

WrriterNg:
⚡Suspect in New Orleans attack identified as 42-year-old Shamsud Din Jabbar, who had an ISIS flag - NOLA

Just like their dominance in reaper drones that they have lost 14 of it to the Houthis.

obedience4:
Whether you acknowledge it or not, America dominace on Ai can't be disputed.

The western world influences issues by creating a perception with a narrative even when that narrative is completely false.

WriteerNg:
No it was a smart move but I don't expect someone like you to understand. Russia just took out the only leverage Ukraine had.... the threat of stopping gas transit. Before Ukraine could even do it.

If you think Ukraine stopping gas transit affects Russia then you're really stupid like everyone here says.

Russia, China, India, Turkey and Central Asian countries are opening up new gas routes everyday, to keep Russian gas flowing unrestricted and immune to western control.

Sadly the only people this decision will affect is Ukraine, Slovakia, Hungary and other countries that rely on them.

No more gas transit fees for Ukraine. Russian gas will still get to them through third parties anyway.

Why are you screaming?

Gbadebo19:
The same US that did not allow Polio to wither away the stupid fingers you are using to type rubbish on the internet. Of course, you must always see their bad side, never their good side. Ordinarily being alive and able bodied is enough reason to be proud of US and what they have done. Only an able bodied person has the maximum potential to become anything they want, a person defective in body is almost likely going to be a liability. Of course, there are PWDs that will not fall into such category, but a large amount will be dependants.
Whatever a person is going to be in life, he or she first of all needs to be able bodied or the challenges will be too much to surmount.
Ungrateful element!!!

So the eyes of the whole world are not on the US as an aggresor with the multitude wars they have instigated.

Gbadebo19:
You should check the meaning of "trigger" and apply it to yourself concerning those leaked docs about USA that you know of.
Were you not triggered?
There is no doubt, you were also triggered. It's simple human nature, there is no reason to make a mountain out of a molehill.
And moreover, Russia is fighting a war, the eyes of the world is currently on nowhere other than Russia because it is seen by most as the aggressor. All these things are pure human nature. There is nothing about witch-hunting to it.

Just because the American media say something does not make it a fact. The mainstream media in America is a joke already. So Americans can keep talking about an 'American AI dominance' that doesn't exist. Americans think they are dominant in everything.

obedience4:
Thank God you have the brain to acknowledge American dominace when it comes to AI. Unlike your ignorant colleagues.

Yeah it all about competition, tech companies around the world are spending billions of dollars on AI. You think they are investing such amount just for the sake of it, everyone is looking for that edge against it competitors.

China don't compete?? DeepSeek and other Chinese cheap ass copy of american technology are meant to do what??

This video is fake. The aircraft was shot down by friendly fire. LMAO.

Kingsnairaland:
Yemen records as they shoot down USA military jet over it sea sky's

Lol


https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMkA2Yatt/

Now pentagon won't come and lie again that they shoot it themselves lol

The US media and govt advanced a false narrative that Assad was killing unarmed protesters and began to provide arms to rebels trying to topple him.

obedience4:
You are way out of your depths.

Trump advanced a false narrative that the elections were rigged. And call on his supporters to march on DC.

He was indicted for his role on the short lived insurrection.

These are popular knowledge

The US was openly supporting the cause of the rebels and blaming Assad. Tell me what exactly did Trump have to do about the insurrection in America? Do you have any proof that he sponsored them?

obedience4:
Please this are two different scenarios.

Read about the "Arab spring" the US had nothing to do with the protest in Syria. The US only supported Kurdish militia against ISISs in Syria.

Sleep well

BTW, I am a Christian. You and other brainwashed Christians all around the world will bring up any irrelevant argument to support your wrong stance.

smokinloud:
Mandate of Palestine was for the Jews and Arabs, it was never an ethnicity. The Peels commission gave Arabs 70 percent of the land but Ur slave masters refused and went into war instead but Israel defeated Arabs and won the land just like Saud family conquered Saudi Arabia. Arabs plan was to annihilate Israel from the River to the Sea but Israel won and humiliated them. They conquered the land like the Saud family conquered Saudi Arabia through war. Israel will never annihilate the Arabs but will COLONISE THEM FOR THE NEXT 100 YEARS UNTIL THE ARABS OF THE REGION DO AWAY WITH TERRORISM AND EMBRACE MODERN CIVILIZATION.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peel_Commission

You are just going round in circles, refusing to answer my questions. You and your likes should enjoy your ignorance. It is bliss until the day you get a rude awakening.

Botragelad:
Cry baby. Go bite on your cushion!😂

So the January protesters were misled by Trump. Why don't you say the Syrian protesters were misled by the US who backed them? Have you seen your inconsistencies now?

obedience4:
Different scenarios,
they were mislead by trump, and rightly they were arrested.. the Arab spring brought about the protest.

Stop calling Jews an ethnic group. It is a fraud.

Botragelad:
You are an African with no knowledge about Israel or the middle East! 🤷🏼

When I say "Jewish people" I'm referring to a distinct ethnic group with a shared history, culture, and ancestry.

There are differences between European Jews (Ashkenazim) and Middle Eastern Jews (Mizrahim and Sephardim), this doesn't change the fact that they share a common Jewish heritage. In fact, genetic studies have shown that Jewish communities around the world, despite their differences, share a common ancestry that dates back to ancient Israel.

Really, your comment about Netanyahu not looking like a Middle Eastern person is quite amusing. Do you not know that many Jewish people, including those from Middle Eastern backgrounds, have a diverse range of physical characteristics? It's not about looking "Middle Eastern" or not; it's about sharing a common Jewish identity.

And, by the way, what's this nonsense about Israel being the only place where you'll find "white Middle Eastern people"? Have you not heard of the many Jewish people from Middle Eastern backgrounds who have lived in Israel for centuries?

Bloody frustrating dealing with folks like you! 😂

Thanks for recognising that Palestine was a STATE. Every other thing in this write up is meaningless to the conversation.

Botragelad:
Still talking nonsense.
Yes, "state" can refer to a political entity with a defined territory and government, the context of our conversation clearly implied a sovereign state. The fact remains that Palestine was not a sovereign state and still not one!🤷🏼

Regarding the Oyo Empire, you mentioned that it was a state until it was replaced by the Nigerian colonial state. Now, according to history, the Oyo Empire was a pre-colonial kingdom that existed for some century. Although, like you said indirectly, it was eventually absorbed into the British colonial empire and became part of modern-day Nigeria, its historical existence as a state can not be denied. Right or wrong?

Also, France during World War II, you said that it became a client state under German occupation. That's also correct! The thing is when Germany conquered France in 1940, the French government had to sign the Armistice of Compiègne, which made France a client state of Germany. Even though France retained some degree of autonomy, its sovereignty was severely curtailed during this period.

Now, here's the big difference. Both the Oyo Empire and France, even under German occupation, retained a level of international recognition as states. Palestine, on the other hand, was never recognized as a sovereign state by the international community.

Sorry, but if Palestine's existence as a state is based on its identity, then why did the Palestinian Arabs fail to establish a functioning state during the British Mandate period (1920-1948), despite having the opportunity to do so? 😂

Before the mandate you are talking about, there was Ottoman Palestine, a state under the Ottoman empire. Before then, it was Roman Palestine, a state under Roman empire.

smokinloud:
Mandate of Palestine was for the Jews and Arabs, it was never an ethnicity. The Peels commission gave Arabs 70 percent of the land but slave masters refused and went into war inDo you want to dispute this? stead but Israel defeated Arabs and won the land just like Saud family conquered Saudi Arabia.

Also, what exactly do you mean by the Jewish people. That is a loose terminology akin to saying 'Muslim people'. European Jews and middle eastern Jews are definitely not the same ethnic group even though the same religion. The Jews in Middle east have more similarities to the Arab muslims than the European Jews. Does Netanyahu look like a middle east person to you? Only in Israel will you find a white middle eastern person. They have deceived the world with this Jewish ethnic nonsense.

Botragelad:
Amanda, you are freakier than I thought! 😂
Here's your previous statement "So do you now agree that colonial Nigeria was a state and Palestine was a state.". You were the one who said Palestine is a state. Why backtracking like a typical empty islamic terrorist supporter?🤷🏼

To answer your question directly: No, Palestine was never a state.

The Jewish people's connection to the Land of Israel is well-documented throughout history. The fact that the Jewish state was not continuously sovereign over that period does not negate the Jewish people's historic claim to the land.

Again, if the Palestinian national identity is rooted in a shared history and culture, then why did the Palestinian leadership reject the 1947 UN Partition Plan, which would have given them a sovereign state alongside Israel?
Just shut up please already if you have no idea about this topic.

Are you okay at all. I said 'Palestine was a state' not 'Palestine was a sovereign state".
A state is a state whether it is independent or not. The Oyo empire was a state until it was replaced by the Nigerian colonial state. When Germany conquered France in world war 2, France did not cease to be a state but became a client state to Germany. It still had a government controlled by Germany.

Botragelad:
Amanda, you are freakier than I thought! 😂
Here's your previous statement "So do you now agree that colonial Nigeria was a state and Palestine was a state.". You were the one who said Palestine is a state. Why backtracking like a typical empty islamic terrorist supporter?🤷🏼

To answer your question directly: No, Palestine was never a state.

The Jewish people's connection to the Land of Israel is well-documented throughout history. The fact that the Jewish state was not continuously sovereign over that period does not negate the Jewish people's historic claim to the land.

Again, if the Palestinian national identity is rooted in a shared history and culture, then why did the Palestinian leadership reject the 1947 UN Partition Plan, which would have given them a sovereign state alongside Israel?
Just shut up please already if you have no idea about this topic.

Everything here is based on 'Ukrainian authorities said". There were no western reporters reporting live in these cities oh. Compare that with Jazeera's report on Gaza war. Western media have become a joke even to westerners.

obedience4:
🤣🤣🤣😂😂🤣😂😂🤣

Wow..

You are sounding "stup!d", that's what happens when you try to justify nonsense.

According to Russia numbers, which everyone knows are false over 3k civilians died in muripol. Three thousand people were used as human shield.
Does that makes sense to you??

After US intervention in both Syria and Libya it is on record that much more civilians died. US is a big hypocrite. Who supports terrorists more than the US? Osama was a hero but became US enemy. Saddam was supported by US to invade Iran and later became their enemy. US funded groups in Syria who later splitted up and some of them started ISIS with the weapons America gave them.

obedience4:
Like I said earlier the US only intervene, after the killings of civilians, via a UN resolution by enforcing a no flight zone and supporting the opposition to get rid of gaddafi..

How do you intervene in a military conflict?? Is it by sharing puff puff?? By military force. And that's exactly what the US did.

Gaddafi is dead, he won't be missed, he was an active supporter of terrorism.

If The American state was so good, why did its citizens try to storm its parliament in January 2021? Why did the US govt have to arrest those rebels?

obedience4:
Lol, so you still are among the gullible few who believes this old propaganda??
Please help yourself and fact check all does things you wrote.

Gaddafi was so good, how come it's citizens took up arms against him, there was an Arab spring which sweept through the Arab world, Libya wasn't the only Arab country affected.
the US wasn't the cause of the uprising that topple Libya regime. they only intervene to stop killings of civilians via a UN resolution..

All these are common knowledge.

Nobody said palestine was a sovereign state.
Was it a state, yes or no? The Jewish state was non existent for over 2,000 years until created in 1948.

Botragelad:
You sound so confused. Why did you not answer my previous questions?🤷🏼
Carrying a passport under the colonial government doesn't necessarily mean that Nigeria was a sovereign state. After all, the British monarch was still the head of state, and the colonial administration held significant power over the territory at the time.

As for Palestine. Again, just because the name "Palestine" has been associated with the region since Roman times doesn't mean that it was a sovereign state in the modern sense. The region was ruled by various empires and dynasties throughout history, including the Ottoman Empire and the British Empire.

Now, here's a question for you: If Palestine was indeed a sovereign state under the Romans, why did it not exist as a distinct political entity for thousand of years after the Roman Empire fell? And why did the Palestinian national movement only emerge in the mid-20th century, in response to the Zionist movement's efforts to establish a Jewish homeland?

And another thing: If the name "Palestine" is indeed the defining characteristic of a sovereign state, then why do you not recognize the Jewish people's historic connection to the Land of Israel, which has been documented extensively in several ancient sources?
I'm tired of listening to kids who don't read. You folks just repeat Palestine rubbish. Well, it only exist in your head!

My grandfather was a citizen of Nigeria under Lord Lugard and is still a citizen of Nigeria today. People carried a Nigerian passport under the colonial govt as much as they do now. So do you now agree that colonial Nigeria was a state and Palestine was a state.

Another argument will be that Palestine was not the creation of the British but has been there as an entity since the time of the Romans. It doesn't matter who is ruling it, the name of a place is its name.

Botragelad:
The statement you're trying to argue on is quite straightforward. Nigeria, as a geographic political entity, did indeed exist under colonial rule, but it was not a sovereign state. The amalgamation of the Northern and Southern Protectorates in 1914 created a single entity, but it was still under British control.

Now, let's apply this logic to the Israeli-Palestinian issue. If we consider what you guys call the geographic political entity of Palestine, which was also under colonial rule, does that mean it was a sovereign state? I think not!

You see, the Palestinian leadership's rejection of the 1947 UN Partition Plan, which would have given them a state alongside Israel, is a reminder that they were not interested in sovereignty, but rather in destroying the Jewish state.

So, I ask you, if the Palestinian leadership was not interested in a sovereign state in 1947, why should we consider Palestine a sovereign state today? 🤷🏼
And another thing, if Nigeria's existence as a geographic political entity under colonial rule does not make it a sovereign state, why should we apply a different standard to Palestine? Is it not hypocrisy, as you so put it, to demand sovereignty for Palestine while denying it to Nigeria under similar circumstances?

Common sense I think.

Nigeria was not a sovereign state under colonial rule after amalgamation but there was a geographic political entity called Nigeria. Does that mean it was not a state? You are just trying to use English to confuse those who have already spotted your hypocrisy.

Botragelad:
Mate. Grab some book already! 😂
Palestine was never a sovereign state. It was a region under Ottoman rule, then British rule. The Jewish people have thousands of-years connection to the land, and ** right to self-determination is undeniable.

The British Mandate was not a Palestinian state, but rather a temporary administration.
And by the way, which Palestinian state are you referring to? The one that never existed? Or the one that's been trying to destroy Israel since 1948?

Also, do not forget that the Palestinian leadership of the time rejected the 1947 UN Partition Plan, which would have given them a state alongside Israel.
Instead, they chose to wage war alongside their Muslim brothers against the newly declared State of Israel(the Arabs lost). So, I ask you agan, which Palestinian state are you mourning? The one that was never established due to Arab rejectionism? 😂😂

There are secession agitations in Barcelona. Is the Spanish govt sending troops to kill them?

Gbadebo19:
You are contradicting yourself...
How did the armoured tanks get there in the first instance? Was it not to quell secession agitations? It's hypocritical to state that the Donbass revolt started with civilians protesting... What were they protesting about? The right to secede?

God bless you my brother.

Vic2023:
why does USA support Kosovo against Serbia and Does not support donbas against Ukraine?

Please fear God. The donbas revolt started with civilians protesting. They were harmless people until their government started attacking them. There are videos on YouTube of civilians standing in front of armoured tanks to prevent them from moving forward.

obedience4:
Do you know what escalation means??
If the eastern part of Nigeria decides to break away, and starts fighting with the Nigeria military let say 2001 and in 2010 a super power like the US or China decides to recognize the break away region, isn't that escalation??

Taiwan at a stage was internationally recognised more than China, the worst thing any country can do to China is recognising taiwan as a independent country.

We have seen Zelensky protest about countries calling Crimea Russian territory, some countries.

In conclusion Russia recognising does break away region was an escalation

Sudan finally granted South Sudan independence after several years of fighting.
That revolt was a just cause because the people in South Sudan don't feel any affinity for Sudan.I

Gbadebo19:
No sane country does what you are expecting Ukraine to do. Can you list at least 3 countries that have done such? You are only trying to absolve Russia. And secondly, even if Ukraine was wrong in the handling of the matter, how does that give Russia the right to move in its military. Can Benin Republic move in its military to defend the Yorubas if they are agitating for seccession?

The westerners and Ukrainians never had the intention of obeying the Minsk agreements.
Check out Merkel's statements on it.

obedience4:
Russia broke the Minsk agreement multiple times,
The Minsk was never going to hold water, putin knew the Ukrainians were using it to buy time to allow Western aid in..

Its simply hard for a country to give up its lands,

What gave the US the right to invade Panama and arrest the leader of the country? No sane country of Russia's pedigree will also do what you expect them to do; watch as ethnic Russians are being massacred in Ukraine. If America will not take it, Russia should not take it.

Gbadebo19:
No sane country does what you are expecting Ukraine to do. Can you list at least 3 countries that have done such? You are only trying to absolve Russia. And secondly, even if Ukraine was wrong in the handling of the matter, how does that give Russia the right to move in its military. Can Benin Republic move in its military to defend the Yorubas if they are agitating for seccession?