₦airaland Forum

[flash=425,344]http://www.youtube.com/watch/v/yTQxBVn9kTI[/flash]

(72)Chapter Name: Al-Jinn or The Jinns

In the name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful.

(1) Say (O Muhammad): It is revealed unto me that a company of the Jinn gave ear, and they said: Lo! it is a marvelous Qur'an,
(2) Which guideth unto righteousness, so we believe in it and we ascribe unto our Lord no partner.
(3) And (we believe) that He--exalted be the glory of our Lord!--hath taken neither wife nor son,
(4) And that the foolish one among us used to speak concerning Allah an atrocious lie.
(5) And lo! we had supposed that humankind and jinn would not speak a lie concerning Allah--
(6) And indeed (O Muhammad) individuals of humankind used to invoke the protection of individuals of the jinn so that they increased them in revolt (against Allah);
(7) And indeed they supposed, even as ye suppose, that Allah would not raise anyone (from the dead)
[8] And (the Jinn who had listened to the Qur'an said): We had sought the heaven but had found it filled with strong warders and meteors.
(9) And we used to sit on places (high) therein to listen. But he who listened now findeth a flame in wait for him;
(10) And we know not whether harm is boded unto all who are in the earth, or whether their Lord intendeth guidance for them;
(11) And among us there are righteous folk and among us there are far from that. We are sects having different rules.
(12) And we know that we cannot escape from Allah in the earth, nor can we escape by flight.
(13) And when we heard the guidance, we believed therein, and whoso believeth in his Lord, he feareth neither loss nor oppression.
(14) And there are among us some who have surrendered (to Allah) and there are among us some who are unjust. And whoso hath surrendered to Allah, such have taken the right path purposefully.
(15) And as for those who are unjust, they are firewood for hell.
(16) If they (the idolaters) tread the right path, We shall give them to drink of water in abundance
(17) That We may test them thereby, and whoso turneth away from the remembrance of his Lord; He will thrust him into ever growing torment. (18) And the places of worship are only for Allah, so pray not unto anyone along with Allah.
(19) And when the slave of Allah stood up in prayer to Him, they crowded on him, almost stifling.
(20) Say (unto them, O Muhammad): I pray unto Allah only, and ascribe unto Him no partner.
(21) Say: Lo! I control not hurt nor benefit for you.
(22) Say: Lo! none can protect me from Allah, nor can I find any refuge beside Him
(23) (Mine is) but conveyance (of the truth) from Allah, and His messages; and whoso disobeyeth Allah and His messenger, lo! his is fire of hell, wherein such dwell for ever.
(24) Till (the day) when they shall behold that which they are promised (they may doubt); but then they will know for certain) who is weaker in allies and less in multitude.
(25) Say (O Muhammad, unto the disbelievers): I know not whether that which ye are promised is nigh, or if my Lord hath set a distant term for it.
(26) (He is) the knower of the Unseen, and He revealeth unto none His secret,
(27) Save unto every messenger whom he hath chosen, and then He maketh a guard to go before him and a guard behind him
(28) That He may know that they have indeed conveyed the messages of their Lord. He surroundeth all their doings, and He keepeth count of all things.

This is nothing wrong in marrying from the military. Question you need to ask yourself is who will he be fighting for? But why should your wife be a solider? Men, that's weird, I can't marry a military woman.

What do you expect them to say. That Jesus is also a slave of Allah?

*osisi*:
As someone who prays for Obama and his upcoming administration with thousands and millions of Christians,may everything you wish him return to you a hundred fold not only to you but to your generations to come unless they come to the saving Grace of Christ.

But this your conditionality looks grave.

You will surely flee seven ways.

Was this what Jesus taught you?

No weapon fashioned againstv Obama will prosper but every demonic tongue that rises against him shall be confused and confounded in Jesus' name

Please, your fire may only be to yourself, because God doesn't like those who hate Muslims.

and right now I send that confusion into the camp of that serpent,the enemy
The name above every other name Jesus,is against you.

That is one thing that surprises me about Christians they are always commanding or sending. One Muslim I know went to a church and the pastor blew a wind by his hands, everybody fell. Except this Muslim, the pastor said I command you, I send, I order, I . . . Your demo too much.

That almighty name  Jesus is mightier than any demons you send towards him.
I rebuke you Satan,in the name of my Lord and my God.
America  shall survive and prosper
Israel shall be free
That is the decree of the almighty and no devil in hell can stop it.

If you don't know who the true Satans are, then don't say.

ayinba1:
@Frizy

I don't know if the original post is your creation but I do pick an issue with the word "slave" in describing Obama. It smacks of a racist tone so I am thinking it originated from one our Arab brothers.

Well, it wasn't my original post but by a brother I know in New York. However, "slave" in this sense must not necessarily be termed racist because they call McCain and Bush the same thing. Please am not among the people who necessarily feel happy or sad that U.S has a black president, and they don't. That has no meaning, the only meaningful thing is what he has to do- his heart. If filled with darkness, then whether he is called a slave of Israel or their he-goat. It is never a problem. Sorry if that makes you feel hurt.

Are muslims going to be a minority sometimes? Yes! So your proposal that we should not vote at all is something I'd like you to explain Islamically. I want us to be very cautious with the way we analyse things.

Well voting for those who engage in killing Muslims is not allowed Islamically. Would Allah be happy if you elected a Pharaoh promising to kill the Children of Israel when they were God's chosen at the time?

It is completely shameful and appalling that obama has remained pretty much "mum" concerning Palestine (astaghfirulah if he did)but then he never said he was a muslim nor promised that he would fight Israel over Palestine.

You see, if its not what we have in the world today, it is not right for a Muslim to vote for an unjust ruler. Being biased to a sect while living others to suffer to death. What that speech only tells you is to get prepared for the man of Change. I bet his change may not even favor most of the American populace except if few rich among them. If this guy is all about war, he would place America, and its economy is a complete deprivation. Although an Arab scholar called Obama a slave sometime ago, 90% of the Arabs loved Obama and the Arab world was in a ceremonial state when he won. But things would soon change. Obama said he would defend Israel,support them with all his might, and avoid Palestine from having any form of defense. He even said Israel's security would be $30billion budget in his administration, as for Palestine nothing.

Yeah though, religion and politics are closely intertwined, we need to still recognise political moves when we see them.

So do you except Obama to say something that grave then change his mind all of a sudden. Even Nigerian politicians never promise things this seriously when they only hope to lie to people.

so Frizy, before I crucify obama, tell me what has the Saudi government/leadership done aout the Palestinian situation, or even about the sudan embarassment? and while they share the same bed with the US leaderhip. I ask these questions with the hope to get an insight from you as to what the Prophet of Allah(SAW) would do.

You see, this people you call Saudi government, are feed by Americans. They have sold their pledge to the enemy, you don't think this people truly represent their people do you? . The Prophet would never lay his pledge with people who continually kill Muslims, fight Islam, and hope to cover the world with their demonic agenda in the name of democracy or globalization. So the prophet would have protected the Palestine, fought Israel till they surrender, and over come America itself. He wont go to the U.N for answers and sit at home when he knows how things run.

I have been where you are right now and I have, alhamduliillah, participated in islamic political discussions in nigeria,(not much in the US). May Allah continue to expand our horizons and increase our Iman (Amin)

Good, if you want to participate in politics in the U.S you need to have the right insight. Visit www.revolutionmuslim.com they wont mislead you.

And tell me, why are the "muslim nations" unable? or unwilling? to aid the weaker Islamic societies? surely, Allah has given us all the tools. we must be doing something(s) wrong.

Point of correction, Muslim nations are not Islamic States. The idea Islamic State follow the Shariah of Allah with no compromise. Leaders from Saudi to Egypt to the UAE and all other Muslim dominated countries do not abide by it. The Western world have successfully empowered this men we call leaders to dance to their tune. Any it must be known that if you sign your pledge to the U.N or World bank, the West has at you the death blow. Just as a doctor could just take the juggler vein of a dying patient out. At revolution muslim for example, they are trying to bring to reality an Islamic State that would have a strong economy, a mighty army against the kafrs that only love to fight Muslims, and a complete reform of the society. Islamic Order would be formed, and all these leaders you call Muslim leaders would not like that. With intellectual capacity and innovative minds things would soon change. Believe its a matter of time. Muslim countries are meant to run one economy, and share the same borders. But the west was able to split the Muslim empire after the fall of Ottoman in Turkey. That is why they have created into the hearts of many that you should be a nationalist and take less about other Muslims world-wide. The prophet said this ummah is one and divide it not!

In other words, the rich Muslim government in this time has no say in defending other Muslim countries because they rely on arms from Kafrs. It is the collection of Kafrs that dictate the affairs of Muslims, a very pathetic scenario. And again apostates leaders would never want to support Hamas or whoever because they are a threat to their own regime. Please you need to know that these leaders don't represent the voice of their people.

tonight, I watched nbc news and the palestinian news that heaed the broadcast means things are way worse in palestine than being reported and the news was bad enough.

As alternative news media are on the rise, nbc would be biased not to show a scene. However, it is their wish never to even report the scenes because they are indirectly exposing the atrocities of their Jewish paymasters.

ayinba1:
@Frizy,

What do you propose that we do? In a society where muslims are being targeted with Privacy Act, unauthorised wiretaps etc, one candidate says "I will continue with this practice", the other said " I will put an end to this". Is the solution really for us to remain aloof from making an impact in what will affect our lives(religion) in a society we dwell in?

While I understand the dilemma, Obama's aggression towards Muslims living outside the US is terrible. Even Bush did not speak like this, no US diplomate ever did!

My question is what exactly do you propose?

I just say don't vote for any. That will keep your heart at rest that you didn't vote for a Muslim hater.

McCain is not smart enough about Middle East affairs and he would have committed a blunder if he had wanted to make any statement about Palestine/Israeli conflict. Are you even bothered at all that he wanted to "bomb, bomb, bomb Iran"

Frankly, Muslim political analysts, recognize that McCain and Obama are not the idea candidate for the Muslims, however, they are saying McCain may have even been better. Did you hear that speech at all? Obama said he would bankrupt the Iranian economy, and make them deprived of everything, same to Lebanon. I repeat, George Bush as never said anything this strong in a speech known to the public, never! Some Muslims thought because Obama said he will take away troops from Iraq, that means the fool will focus more on his country's well-being. However, because the US is in control of Iraq but failed in Afghanistan- Obama thinks it is best to send troops back to Afghanistan to fight the mujaheddin. Whether we accept it or not, the mujaheddin have been the sole defense of Islam, and all those scholars who sit behind and call them the spoilers of Islam could never have won any soul into Islam if these guys didn't sacrifice. The plan of Obama and co. is to wipe Islam off the earth, but they wont. Allah instead would soon wipe them out.

plc group:
You guys are wasting your energy here. My own point is "Israel should dash them more bombs." That is the only language those criminals understand.

The same way Allah and Islamists will cast terror into your heart and life- for your unbelief and wickedness.

Yes, I agree on that. Israel is a terrorist Zionist State.

ayinba1:
salam my dear brothers,

Obama was the lesser of the two evils. McCain would have sent troops into Palestine by now to aid their Issraeli allies. Sadly, America is Israel's prostitute, even Obama will find it hard to change that.

My sister, that's not the argument. What we're saying is there is none of the two, McCain or Obama that you should have voted for. Look, Obama was bold enough to say Jerusalem will not be shared between Palestine and Israel. What Bush or McCain never ever said while in office or during their campaign. Obama is a bloody Zionist!

When will the American government learn there is more to life than wars?

As Barack Obama sits silent as Israel drops bombs on innocents and cowers afraid to fight man to man on the ground and the American liberal community seeks to create a new sense of liberal fascism whereby they will witness the privitization of their infrastructure, decreasing quality of life for the middle and lower classes,  austerity programs for social services, and rapid military build-up alongside continuous expansive and imperialist wars (sounds like Nationalist Socialism) and the great hope they elected turns into the biggest hypocrite of all time - we send a clear and direct message to the slew of hypocrites that voted for him and are still hopeful that the CHANGE he will bring will in some way prove to be just,  GUESS WHAT - Barack Obama told you a long time ago he was a despicable, house slave that cares for nothing other than chanting slogans and smiling at cameras to get elected. He represents a continuation of American Neo-Fascism and a new wave that will inspire the countless thousands of American exesitentialist, liberal fascists that think their country can do no wrong and represents all the good in the world. This speech should prove to you how insane this idiot is. We'll keep you posted on his plans, but in the meantime this one goes out to all the Muslim buffoons that voted for him - You had your information early but you blindly follow the mainstream - Want News? REVOLUTIONMUSLIM -  May Allah send destruction on this kaffir - embarass him - and make him the laughing stock of American History - the only President to bankrupt the dollar and the US. military in the same term. Amin!!!

Listen to his speech: http://www.npr.org/templates/player/mediaPlayer.html?action=1&t=1&islist=false&id=91150432&m=91152375

I just wish the prophet was alive now. Israel would have been wiped off the map by now, knowing fully well that these apostates we call Arab leaders wont be in power by then.

These are the true Jews Muslims and Allah loves. Allah Himself says: ". . . Of them are some who are moderate (true Jews) but many of them are evil livers (bloody Zionists)"

@osisi,hope you know that 40% of palestinians who are arab are also christian,maybe this will change your mind on the issue since you're a muslim hater!!supporter of western aggression and exploitation.i cannot understand how you can support the west given what they did yo us black people,its the same that theyre doing to palestinians.but you people are mad,i can't blame you!

I agree on that one. I have never in my life on nairaland seen davidlyan and his gang mates like osisi make a concession during an argument. They rather remain blind and happy with the pathetic state they find themselves in.

texazzpete:
@frizy
it does not say well for you that you've continously avoided the question.

"What, in your opinion, is a proportional response, and how does Israel go about it"?


Stop dodging the shoe bullet by ranting about 'Zionists'.

No, there is no proportionality when we know this warfare is just a guerrilla war. Israel with the aid of the United States have been able to secure a military complex. However, whenever Palestine seeks to acquire weapons in order to protect itself, it's seen as illegal. In there own land? The air strikes Gaza suffered in days would not have happened if Gaza had self propelled heat seekers to blast off the F-16. So there is no proportionality, Israel's blockage to all humanitarian efforts, Israel's red alert on newly acquired weapons by Hamas, and Israel's control of land, sea, and air therefore- for a proportionality they need to allow the free flow of weaponry and arsenals particularly from Iran and other Muslims State. For proportionality they need tanks, and fighter jets, for proportionality they need to allow Palestinians master the art of war rather using stones as a form of defense.

Because, why must the US equip Israel and lay sanctions on any individual/country/organization that has his pledge to the Palestinians. Why?. Why must you think you're right and call others terrorist? . Don't you think you're also a terror to them?

ilugunboy:
Why are people talking "proportionality" here for. Don't forget in Military conflict thee aren't nothing like that word.

Isreal objectives is either to knock Hamas into submission and accept the state of Isreal (very doubtful and difficult to achieve) or remove the capabilities to launch their Iranian supplied rockets into Isreal cities that puts many Isrealies into harm way everyday.

Any means to achieve the objectives militarily is what Isreal will pursue. Talking of proportion is insane. How many palestine should be killed to make it proportionate if I may ask?. "One For One" is not military conflict, it is vegeance.

HAMAS ( acronym for the Arabic words meaning "Palestinian Islamic Resistance Movement" has continuously refused to recognise Isreal's right to exist and also reiterated calls for the destruction of the Jewish state.

Isreal by now having learn some good lessons from the 2006 Hizbolla war understand that no matter what, they can't never win on the PR side should just go in and do whatever it takes to end this madness call HAMAS.

You say vengeance, your justification of the atrocities committed by Israel to Palestine will only escalate more and more aggression between the West and Muslims from around the world. Someone said George Bush tried to reduce hostility by invading the lands that weren't his fathers. Don't you think the continuous "war against terror" would turn the world into a terroric planet? Because all this those beliefs never brings peace but more and more battles that would never be won by you- I mean the Zionist, and all the US apologetics!

jameau:
it is obvious that the posts on this topic are tainted with religious bigotry and prejudice which has blinded majority of us to the real issue at hand here which ,i believe is the humanitarian disaster isreal's actions in gaza is capable of creating.most of the posts are classic fallacies ;like justifying the slaughter of innocent civilians in gaza because christians were killed in jos nigeria.
i do not subscribe to the view that the geneva conventions do not apply to the conflict simply because hamas is not a signatory.Quite to the contrary ,the conventions and the additional protocols thereto apply to a conflict whenever a high contracting party (i.e a signatory )is involved(COMMON ARTICLE 1).Isreal is a signatory to the instruments and this is a ground for making the conventions applicable to it.

The point i believe should be addressed is whether isreal has complied substantially with the rules of war.Of course ,the self defence of isreal is non negotiable as its allies would claim.But what about the rule of [b]PROPORTIONALITY?[/b]Is the murder (or manslaughter ) of over 500 largely civilan gazans the appropriate response to the handful of civilians killed by hamas rockets?

I have no doubt in my mind that hamas has not behaved in a civil way towards isreal;but then ,as non state actors on the international scene ,not much can be expected from them.Isreal ,on the other hand ,can ,and probably will be found guilty and punished for its war crimes in Gaza.We should always beart in mind that Hamas and isreali leaders are all politicians ,always willing to use the ordinary people as cannon fodder.The ordinary people's welfare ,whether on isreal or palestinian side should be our concern

Thank you for your post. Well appreciated.

texazzpete:
@Frizy, JustGood
When your Imam talks about Palestinians robbed of their lands, does he touch on the issue of Christians now being forced out of many places in Iraq by adherents of the 'religion of peace'?

Strange that no Arab leader or country has come out to protest this injustice, or encouraged the displaced Christians to begin an 'Intifada'.

Our Imams condemns any form of terrorist harshness towards Muslims and Non-Muslims living in the Muslim territory. When Israel and America stops their military bully that is the time we can have peace. I don't get you guys, do you expect Hamas to fold their hands, smile at Israel, and exchange pleasantries when Israel's action within the region is only terrorism? No light in Gaza, Israel has started bombing hospitals, 530 people are killed in cold blood. But only 1 solider of Israel and 4 civilians have been killed by Hamas or resistance movement. Palestinians are throwing stones to the tanks that invaded their land 3 days ago. How do you justify this equality? How  

@davidlyan

Your continuous justification of what cannot be justified only shows your heartlessness.

Israel War on Gaza: A Defensive Warfare or a Terrorist Act?

The uneven war between Israel and the Gaza strip has created sympathy from Arabs and

non-Arabs around the world that infers that the Israeli attacks on the strip is a war crime

according to Palestinians (A Palestinian View: War Crimes in Gaza Put PA in Awkward

Place). Adhering to the International law on War, Protocol 1 of the Additional to the

Geneva Conventions, 1977, Section 1, Article 48 states: “In order to ensure respect for

and protection of the civilian population and civilian objects (during war), the Parties to

the conflict shall at all times distinguish between the civilian population and combatants

and between civilian objects and military objectives and accordingly shall direct their

operations only against military objectives”. On the 6th day of Israel’s attack on Gaza an

estimate of 485 civilians including women and children were killed and only 33 reported

Hamas Islamist militants, Israel’s supposed enemy were martyred on the onslaught

(Al-Jazeera/English). Israel’s political appointees further said on their first day of operation

that the attacks were directed only towards Hamas’ military wing and that their operation

in Gaza was far from completion (Shimon). The aggression towards Gaza by Israel since

the last 7 days contradicts Israel’s claims that its only objective was cease the attacks of

rockets by Hamas into Southern Israel because Hamas opted for a ceasefire if Israel will

discontinue its air strikes using advanced F-16 fighter jets to bomb indiscriminately Gazan

residences, hospitals, mosques, and government institution owned by Hamas or Fatah

(Al-Jazeera/English). A Washington spokesman speaking through Al-Jazeera said:

“Whether 16 Israelis were killed since 2001 by rocket fires from Hamas compared to the

380 in Gaza in 5 days, the numbers in Gaza is absolutely meaningless, the United States

condemns Hamas aggression towards Israel” (New Hour). Michael Bloomerg another

Washington spokesman was quick to say that Hamas owns the responsibility for the Israeli

attack and they are to blame (Al-Jazeera/English). However, the use of biased rhetoric in

what can be described as “the defense of the indefensible” further conveys the hatred in

the guise of diplomacy many of the western politicians have for the Arab world,

particularly the Islamist movement like Hamas.

Hamas won the democratic elections in January 2006 by an outstanding victory to the

opposition movement Fatah, the election was nullified. “The fact that the West really

considers democratic elections for Islamists as impermissible for Muslim countries is

documented by the election of Hamas in Palestine in 2006 and the subsequent embargo

and economic deprivation we see continue to this day. The minute it appeared Islamists

were going to win Algerian elections martial law was imposed and a brutal campaign

against Muslims ensued” (Younus 6). The American ideology that believes that democracy

should be implemented in all nations but with the conditionality of loyalty (to them) reflects

that the common interest of the West to secure peace in the region (such as Middle East)

may never be successful. The only practical solution for world peace and particularly the

Middle East is that the Western powers must secure its own borders and careless about

infringing on the fundamental rights of those that resist their policies. Israel should

withdraw the occupied Palestine and revoke their biblical prophecy that says Palestine is

of surety their promised land, if indeed they advocate peace in the region and peace in

the world. It is not arguable that the policy makers in Israel are blood thirsty and believe

the only way to secure their office is to create enmity between Arabs and Israelis further

enabling their populace to conclude they are up to the task for their courage and bravery.

However, the Muslim world, particularly Arabs have a sense of sympathy to dying Muslims

in Iraq, Afghanistan, occupied Palestine, Somalia, just to name a few. The War on Gaza

at this point is not considered to be an even war, Israeli air forces fire rockets at poor

people with nothing to arm themselves except stones and a number of rockets that kills

approximately 16 Israelis in 8 years (Al-Jazeera/English). Israel’s undeclared occupation of

the entire Palestine shows the greed and absolute misuse of power the enemy has

resulted into in the pretext of the slogan, “War against Hamas”. Before the Hamas

movement was established there was war between the two factions, Israel and Palestine;

therefore Hamas has only be used as an excuse to ill-treat the Palestinians and there can

be no prevention of terror if the true terrorist military complex that closes all borders and all

forms of humanitarian aid continues to perpetrate its crime without a check to its operation.

The most disturbing fact of all is the decision of the Arab leaders that purport to seek the

United Nations intervention, knowing their veto of power in the United Nations is far less

than the nations that justify the war formally or through diplomatic processes. Personally,

Israel’s action towards Palestinians since 1948 until date has been an extremist Jewish

indoctrination and Hamas believed extremism is only to defend its people however, the

differences between the two “extremes” is that one has the right to claim what it truly

owns and the others “chronic hypocrisy” known as “diplomacy” is barbaric and is outwardly

–“terrorism”.

This article is written by Femi Salawudeen of the American University in Cairo.

[center]Work Cited:[/center]
Abdullah, Younus Muhammed. By All Means Necessary. New York: A Revolution Muslim Publication, 2008.

Gevena. The Commision of Inqurity for the International War Crimes Tribunal. “Protocol 1 of the Additional to the Geneva Conventions, 1977”. n/a <http://deoxy.org/wc/wc-proto.htm>

Khatib, Ghassan. “A Palestinian View: War Crimes in Gaza Put PA in Awkward Place”.Bitterlemons.org 29 Dec. 2008. 4 Dec2008<http://www.bitterlemons.org/issue/pal1.php>

“New Hours”. Narr. Unknown Reporters. New Hours. Al Jazeera English, London. 4 Jan 2009. 7 G.M.T

Shimon, Pres. Interview with Israeli Parliamentary and Journalist. Israel stance toward Gaza.Ch 10, Israeli Parliamentary, West Bank. 28 Dec. 2008. 9.00 G.M.T

Source: http://www.scribd.com/doc/9712517/Israel-War-on-Gaza

[flash=425,344]http://www.youtube.com/watch/v/5GQrJndpbzc&feature=related[/flash]

@becomerich/nigeria@1

Keep dreaming ok! . Keep dreaming!!

@domisakin

My brother, there is absolutely nothing wrong in running politics in Nigeria, if you don't want to be corrupt, you still need good connections that may not necessarily be in the country. I have a serious ambition in the Nigerian politics as well, its a good thing to start a charity organization to gain the sympathy of the masses. But we need money to run things like this, and there are people that would like to help with their wealth- I mean sincere people. You just need the right connections, if you really want to go into politics you don't have to work all your life to save enough to become the peoples choice. In fact, your main objective should that you have like minds that are wealthy enough to sponsor your objectives secretly.

My aim to make this country developed, and the quick deployment of people that want a change is necessary. Please don't make people tell you it's impossible, they are usually the people that have no hope for themselves with respect to the country and do nothing about. Care less about what the critics say, . Even Jesus and Mohammed the prophet were criticized by their people, but at the end they were successful.

email me on:[email]femisalawudeen@yahoo.co.uk [/email]

KnowAll:
BecomeRich or is it Nigeria 1


You are better off staying in canada as a refugee, you are not contributing anything meaningful to Nairaland but decent and internal strife, if u want to re-locate from canada to rep of benin u can do so without much ado. Do not speak for Yoruba people, we are proud people with a rich history and not deserters, we use to own every land from lagos to abuja and westwards to ghana, and eastwards to delta region up to kogi state. why give that up for one small country. I beg carry yourself and your wife locate to benin if u like this is not a benin site but a nigeria site and i can bet u are a benioise and not a Nigerian.

I told this guy exactly the same thing. Relocate to benin abi now?

And sorry I am not a refuge in any country. Anyone tell you that refuge people can travel. refuges can not travel from one country to another. you life in london ask the Uk government how many times i have entered into Uk in the last few years. And you don see refuge that travel from one country to another before. Go ask germany, or holland govt , EU , I have visa free to more than [b]50 [/b]countries in the world. So wetin you dey talk refuge??

O pa ni o. . 50, no wonder you think benin is Yorubas best home. Ala rin ja bata.

hajifaty:
chidichris, you are funny. how would you feel if u were told that a nigerian is risking his or her life because of so called Israel or Palestine?
To face the reality, Israel is doing more than defending her territory this is a genocide. Israel her people need to be trial for genocide, they are not holy as they claimed to be.
Iran should be allow to deal with Israel.They are relying on the strength of BUSH administration which has come to its end Lets see what Obama have for them

Obama wont be any different. I can formally predict that he worships Israel. Yea, let Iran deal with this people. I really want them to be a thing long forgotten.

Martian:
Why are Arabs so quick to jump up and start protesting when they get a taste of their own medicine.

Which medicine are you talking about? Did they attack Israel during the truce?

Hamas started launching rockets into israel immediately after the truce, none of them said anything, israel blows the whole place up, now they are chanting "death to isreal" and "death to america, the mother of terrorism",

.

This is the dumbest comment I have ever read in centuries. Hamas had only killed 16 Israelis with this so called rocket since 2001. While Israel whipped over 105 people under 5mins yesterday morning. Israel broke their promise, and they were the ones who started firing air strikes into Gaza not Hamas.

Did I miss something? Who are the people that are so eager to blow themselves and innocent people up in the name of jihad?

Another dumb statement. When will U.S stop killing people in Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon, soon Pakistan. When? When will they learn to understand that this people don't want their fcuken policies and peaceful reconciliation to democracy? When

They say they want peace but shout slogans like "No to peace, yes to the rifle", kill indiscriminately but when one of them gets killed in retaliation, they shout REVENGE. Hey idiots, y'all started it.

There will be no peace for this people except they learn to mind their own businesses and stay the Bleep out of the entire Arab world.

I know Israel took their land and whatnot but why put innocent people's lives at risk launching rockets when you know they're going to send planes? SERIOUSLY . Can't they think of a better way?

Better still tell your friends, the U.S and Israel to work a way out and leave Muslims alone.

Just wanted to vent

Same here.

What came with your system?Was it XP? Then it's geniune if your system was bought new, and if not tell the guy that sold it second hand to pass all the kits and installation disc that came with the system to you. If damaged, you may need to pay a little fee for Microsoft if your system originally had one.

@poster
I agree my Dell is shit!  . Am thinking of getting a MacBook.

GettysBurg:
I don't understand.

I mean, people like Yar'adua should not make promises or anticipate what is not becoming. It is only deceit, and God does not like the treacherous!

People have to be careful on what they say. But most politicians never live up to their promises. End of story: No be today.

I believe in God and have faith but with the way people (atheists) talk, I wish God could actually come down and talk n put them to shame,  Been reading htis thread n majority of them are about people not believing in God, that's scary,  especially from Nigerians

There is nothing strange that many people don't believe in God. God said in the Koran: [size=13pt]"As for the disbelievers, whether thou warn them or thou warn them not, it is all one for them, they believe not!"[/size]

Don't act ignorantly praying that God should show Himself to this ingrates, that itself is wickedness.

Riskie:
@Frizy. I don't particularly see anything wrong with Yar'Adua. What is so bad about him? If someone would explain that to me maybe I'll join in on the hate-fest!

Well from the little I know about the man, he claims Nigeria must follow the rule of law, yet all the ex-governors during the Obasanjo Adminstration weren't brought to justice. He has a 7 point agenda that appears more of a fictional theory because he can never achieve just one goal if he is till planning after the second year. Does he want to become a life president. . Obasanjo is better and far more active than this man. Am not saying Obasanjo is the best president, but I have not seen any meaningful development since baba iyabo left.

The worst part of it is that Yar'aduas fight for corruption doesn't seem to be realistic, now Ribadu is out, and the story goes on. Yar'adua is simply making Nigeria sleep, he is slow, the only thing I like about this man is the way he allows journalist talk to him without any form of detest from him when being interviewed. I can't imagine his man ruling a second time, the condition of the country will grow worse and worse.