₦airaland Forum

Logicboy03: Protecting investments by replacing science with religion?

Lol, it's only fair, isn't it. Desperation breeds foul play.

Logicboy03: You d know that there are more atheists in south Korea than christians? If atheists/irreligous people were anything like muslims/xtians, South Korean christians would have been marginalised for this nonsense

I'm not sure about that. I know that there are a lot of atheist in South Korea, but I don't think they are more than the Christians in population. And yes, Atheists can be just as aggressive, just take a look at Japan and China.

I wouldn't call it poisoning per-say, they are just protecting their investments/interest. There is really nothing wrong with that.

In a continent dominated by Buddhaism, Islam and Atheism, Christianity is like an endangered specie. South Korea is actually the only country in Asia with the highest recorded number of Christians, and naturally they want it to remain so.

maclatunji: You see how you have been conditioned to throw rational thought away. 'Nuns don't wear hijab, they wear habits', what a joker. #LOL

*Shaking my head very sadly for you*

tintingz: only if the blessed virgin Mary(mother of your god) didnt wear hijab

That's how the Jews dressed at that period of time and has nothing to do with God. Even their men dress as such.


Like I said before and will keep on saying, Wearing Of Hijab is not of Islam but of Arabia Culture.

Mohammad was an Arab, was he not? He wrote the Quran, didn't he? So it stood to reason that at the course of writing the holy book, he inadvertently missed up the whole thing up, not knowing the difference. Because, let's face it, Arabic culture is also their religion.

jamst: @dan de numero,it took u 23mins 2 respond *smiling* infact,i dont ask u 2 define but only 2 differentiate.u try sha, okey! religion=belief & culture=way of life...and so,the next question,is there any similarity btw religion=belief and culture=way of life.if yes/no,pls give ur reasons.

.

suniblu: wats d point. no price . op u for no bother
.. wetin be my own self. not for me. mtn bis tins on myjelly bean. ......



I get galaxy s2 for sale. bis enabled
...
chiefobdk@gmail.com

Please how did you enable BIS on your S2.

Costa2000: hahahaha so okada rider get time for nairaland abi.

Shine ya eyes, bro. Okada riders dey everywhere.

#By their comments we shall know them.

tonididdy: do u live in edostate...emm...NO...bike riders in Edostate can DIE FOR OSHOMOLE.his relationship with them is just like father to sons...it cant fit to happen,osho baba loves em 2much.they played a major part in his protest to win over Pdp

You write like a typical Okada man.

#No offense intended.

Dear Howard,

Some Chelshit fans say you are a secret Manchester United player, Some even say you are an illegitimate son of SAF.
According to them, everytime, you officiated a game involving the Red Devils, they always end up winning.


This letter is to inform you that I'm solidly behind you on whatever will transpire this weekend. The injustice that transpired last Tuesday will be redeemed, and by your special grace, 2 Chelshit players will be sent off for daring to chest the ball...the fo.ols.

By your unbiased officiating, Man United will show those blue wearing racoons that there is indeed strength in numbers.

Chelshit fans will curse their coach, and Benitez will curse back, all because of your top notch officiating.

I will be at the Theatre of Dreams to personally witness history repeating itself. And why not, you are the match ref after all!

Stay well, and stay safe.

Glory! Glory!! Glory!!! Man United!!!!


Your's sincerely, Frostyzone.

What is Edo government still waiting for?

A well organised modern city doesn't have commercial bike riders as part of the scenes.

To do what used to be a very minor thing such as crossing a very narrow road is now becoming next to impossible to do without having to run across.

Edo government should ban those thugs on motor bikes, abeg!

mysticgal: if dstv fail,abeg switch over to hitv atleast they are trying an...d hitv is affordable.

HiTV is no longer operational.

This is what some pundits had to say;

Everton manager David Moyes on BBC
Radio 5 live: "I think tonight Sir Alex Ferguson will be rightly as angry as he has ever been. The decision changed the game. I am looking from a manager's point of view and Manchester United have had a hard time
tonight. I think they have a right to surround
the referee. The decision was poor and it has
cost them the biggest prize in football."


Former Liverpool and Germany midfielder
Dietmar Hamann on Sky Sports: "He wants
to bring it down, I think no Real Madrid player
expected it, nobody was claiming a red card.
He didn't see him he didn't mean to do it, it's
not even a booking."

None of the pundits are Man united fans or of English nationality.

Who cares??

ceeceeco: I'm a dedicated fan of MUFC though, but i think dat was a dangerous tackle. He's not the only player on the pitch perhaps, so it's a dangerous tackle weda he didn't intentionally or not, it's irrelevant. It's a dangerous tackle. Red card...I think d ref made the right call. & dnt 4get he spoke with his assistant b4 takin his decision. Dis is UEFA & d rules governin its body are very strict. Nani was careless.

Dude, you are really not a Man U fan at all judging by this unreasonable, confounding comment.

A retired Fifa grade A ref(Dermot Gallagher) said after the game, that at the most, the offence would have warranted a yellow card.

He further went on to say that, if United were to appeal the decision, they would almost certainly win, because despite the brutal nature of the tackle, it was largely innocuous.

Maybe, you are more technically and tactically knowledgeable than a retired ref sir, but this time around you got it very wrong.

sayso: Former Manchester United midfielder Roy Keane on ITV: "I think the referee has actually made the right call. Everyone's upset about it and it's slightly unlucky, but it's dangerous play. Whether he meant it or not is irrelevant. It's dangerous play - it's a red card. You have to be aware of other players on the pitch. Does he think he's going to have 20 yards to himself? Whether it's [a brave decision] or not, it's the right decision. Whether he meant it or not doesn't matter. Nani's a quick boy to go down anyway. He's not the bravest player on the planet."

And Mourinho has this to say after the game;

"Independent of the decision, the best team lost. We didn't deserve to win, but football is like this"

Methinks that Mourinho knew Madrid were totally outclassed prior to the sending off.

Bash Me: SHARAPT DIA, DID NANI NOT FAKE IT WHEN HE STARTED ROLLING ON THE PITCH AS IF HE WASN'T THE ONE WHO KICKED SOMEBODY'S ASS LIKE JET LI?

What a dweeb. Did you even watch the match at all? Or are you one of those that watch it on other people's mouths.

Last time I checked, it was an unintentional sternum kick, not arse kick.

No, it wasn't. Nani didn't even see the guy coming as he went for the ball. Nobody, not even The Madrid players expected such an hard decision the ref, as none of them contested it.

I even thought at first that the decision would swing our way, after watching the first replay.
Arbeloa was the clear instigator of the foul, as he had no business throwing himself at an on rushing Nani at all.

My only regret is that he wasn't hospitalized, only then would a red card had been justified.

Those lazy bones got what they deserved.

Salmoneus: A true gamer doesn't play a game just for its graphics...I have an Xbox but I still play Snes, Sega on my laptop, and I'm going to get a Ps2 soon, real gamers look beyond the graphics why do you think they still port classic games like contra for the xbox? even though the graphics is outdated...

I have to disagree. A modern gamer play games especially for it's graphics.

The reason why many gamers migrated from PES to Fifa is mainly because of the superior graphics the later has to offer. The gameplay is only secondary.

The only reason we have 4th generation platforms like Ps3 and XBOX 360 today, is to give modern gamers the opportunity of enjoying their favorite titles in graphically superior environment.

Being an old fashion kind of gamer is different from hardcore, progressive modern gamers such like myself.

While you may prefers playing pes13 on Sega, I wouldn't be caught dead playing it on any other platform that is not 4th gen.

Your definition of a true gamer is so wrong, dude.

usermane: Frostyzone, I said 'SOME ps2 games today beat a number of Ps3 games storywise'. Would u rather play Resident Evil 4 or Tomb Raider underworld. Like Prince of Persia ps2 trilogy got better story than forgotten sands on ps3.

Say what?? I had played then all, and the last time I checked, The forgotten sands beat the Crap out of all the Ps2 counterparts in all department...okay, maybe not in game lengths but in all the other departments that matters.

Resident evil 4 is a pretty decent game, the kind of game you would only see in 4th gen. I had a lot of fun playing two characters in it...until I played it's counterpart on Ps3, Resident evil 5. Now that's a game for champs.

Resident Evil 4 was pretty good both in graphics and gameplay, infact you wouldn't even know you are playing a Ps2 title because of the impressive textures and colour resolutions. But Resident evil 5 still managed the incredible feat of blowing it out of the water, due to the superior graphics(the characters are so realistically detailed that you could practically see beads of sweats on their faces). The gameplay is so surreal that you dare not play the game in the dark and alone. Oh Yes! It's that good.

As for Tomb raider: Underground, I haven't tried it yet as to give you an honest opinion.

usermane: Also in terms of gameplay, compare SMACKDOWN: Here comes the pain(ps2) to SVR 2010(ps3)
Even the game length matters, GOW 2 is lengthier than GOW 3. In my books GOW 2 has a better story.

You may be right. Ps3 have always come up short in wrestling games. I don't know why, but the gameplay almost always sucks compared to Ps2 versions.

They just of recent started getting it right; RAW VS SMACKDOWN 2012 was a real beast

As for GOW 2 being longer than GOW 3, that's a big fat lie.

Both games are epic and won several awards in their era, but in terms of excitements, pound for pound battles, boss fights, stages, storyline, cut scenes, gameplay and graphics, GOW 3 is the clear winner.

It currently rank as the best GOW title in GOW gaming franchise.

Such is life, bro. Besides it would have succeeded if not for the stupidity of the referee.

That unwarranted red card spoilt our whole gameplan.

We have all seen how dangerous an on-form Cr7 could be this past week.

Watching him torment the Pique, Mascherano and Puyol this past Tuesday, reminded me of Ronaldo of Man United yeo days.

The mesmerizing skills, the confidence and the pulsating pace of the man is a joy to watch.

And putting sentiments aside, Ronaldo on his current form is almost impossible to mark. Which doesn't bode well for my club Manchester United.

If Ronaldo should replicate his el clasico form against united, I'm afraid the outcome will not be favorable against the Red Devils.

But he could be marked out successfully if our defenders can raise their game and doesn't lose concentration.

Here are the tips on how to mark Ronaldo I was able to compile.

[b]1. Ronaldo is a very versatile one-on-one kind of striker that likes to run at defenders from the wings. Since stopping him from running down the wings is next to impossible, do the next best thing; Never let him back you into the eighteen yard box, as he's accustomed to doing. Stand your ground and try to stall him as much as possible so that another defender will be able to catch up and render assistance.


2. Cut off the supply lines. Without access to out-field deliveries, Ronaldo is next to harmless.

3. Frustrate him as much as possible by hard pressing him(man-marking) and crowding him out anytime he's in possession.

4. Anytime he's one-on-one with you, the inevitable step-overs will follow. Don't lose your cool and concentration. Wait for the last moment, then pick a side to stick out your boot. If you are lucky, an interception will take place. If you are not....oh well, at least you gave it your best shot.


5. Ronaldo is one of the best headers of the ball on the planet as of now, so you have got to be better at jumping up, anytime a cross or corner is swung across/in the eighteen-yard box.[/b]

That's all the tips I can compile off head at the moment. You can add your own three cent if you can think of any.

Cheers!!!

Wetin you wan Mek we do?

Motor no dey, abeg.


Signed; Nigerian Police

wirinet: yes, every organization is entitled to its values, but not when it is in conflict with your basic human right and dignity. For example, you cannot decree how one lives his/personal life outside the work place. Also yes, you cannot discriminate based on se.x religion or political affiliations and even moral definitions after being employed. Yes, these can be put into consideration before employment, not after. Even if it is in the contract of employment, it can later be contested in court as an illegal contract if it goes against basic fundamental human rights.

You cannot compare a football playing football in a park and risking injury to someone exercises her basic animal right on the right to bear children.

Same for Pepsi advert, who pay superstars huge sums to project their image. It would be unethical for the stars to be seen projecting the image of the company they are advertising

Dude, stop your blind arguments. You are starting to sound ridiculous.

[quote author=Mr_Anony2]On the contrary, I'll side with the school on this one. Every organization has it's values and once a an employee breaches them, the organization has the right to terminate her employment.

Her case is not much different from football clubs prohibiting their players from playing casual football in the park or the case of Ronaldinho's contract with Pepsi terminated because he was caught drinking Coca-cola.
Her pre-marital sex goes against the Christian image the school is trying to uphold just as Ronaldinho drinking Coca-Cola goes against the image Pepsi was trying to uphold.

The only scenario where I see the woman having a case is if such a situation was not covered in her contract.[/quote]Gbam! You nailed it.

I have to side with the school on this one.

The woman knew what she's getting into before and after she got hired as a teacher in that particular institution, and violating the rule/code, however accidentally translates that she must/should get fired.

Trying to get her job back by playing the pregnant woman card wouldn't work in this case, I'm afraid because she willingly and voluntarily signed a contract that barred her from getting pregnant without getting married first.

Madrid who?

Can't wait for the death of Madrid at Old Trafford on Tuesday night.

Glory Glory Man United!!!