₦airaland Forum

bykebyke:
"I see this League dangerously prepared so RM wins it".-Simeone


He got the competition wrong.

Give them a break

tess1:
You should be the one to answer the question.

You lied that he was a failure in every continent he went but came to EPL under nine months and won the title. Whereas, his first stint in EPL was with chelsea. Stop sreading lies.

Ollah1 getting owned with his lies

ollah1:
Nobody labelled Mou a failure for not winning UCL with Madrid. Na so e easy win UCL. They labelled him one simply cos he won few trophies(a paltry 3) within 3 seasons which is the least number of trophies he has in a club.

If Pep is considered a failure at Bayern then we can conclude Fergie was also a failure at Man U

Mourinho was labelled a failure here for not winning the CL with Madrid by these Bayern folks, incase you didn't know.

Fergie never really had the quality of squads Pep has worked with. Pep is not really a failure at Bayern though, it's just that any other top coach could have achieved similar or even more with the same squad and conditions remaining constant.

Nihilist:
I swear down, when we pointed out that Messi was just a freak of nature, Dayo claimed that Pep made him want he is today.

Maybe muller is not a fan of pep talks

All the Pep fancy football for nothing... especially when you don't have extraordinary match winners like Messi.

Nihilist:
The only way Bayern can succeed in Europe...

Is to face German opposition

How can the catalan jesus lose 3 back to back to back semifinals?


DJ gimme TK n Cash- 3 times in a row abeg

They were expecting Muller to perform like Messi...

Muller has been poor though.

I have no reason to support Atletico so goodluck to Bayern today.

Fellani and Huth have been charged by the FA.
http://www.bbc.com/sport/football/36185450

Kagawa10:
Herrera was shite in his last season at Bilbao.
Manutd had no option than to sign him because of the agreement in the previous season.

What agreement did United have with Bilbao the previous season to sign him? Proof please. So far i only know we tabled a bid that season and Bilbao rejected it. So if Herrera performed worse in the successive season, why would United even table and increased bid for him?

Kagawa10:
Lol!
You don start your spinning theory again.
When did I mention that I never said he was a shite player?
People brought up his Bilbao stints, believing he was good and I just had to tell them that he was shite, still shite and forever shite.
And why won't I be on him when he's been part of the players who were woeful this season?

I know some players deserve some stick but what about the most important figure LVG? Why have you not admitted he's sh.it?

Kagawa10:
Doesn't dispute that he was shite as a no 10 in his last season at Bilbao though which is what i'm laying emphasis on.

No. you have always said he's sh.it at almost every chance you get and blame him for a couple of our woes. Don't try to deny it now, it would do you no good.

Kagawa10:
Herrera was shite in his last season at Bilbao.
Manutd had no option than to sign him because of the agreement in the previous season.

No one is gonna debate Herrera is a world class player(even at the time we signed him) but he's far from this piece of sh.it you are trying to paint as him.

SailorXY:
The way I see it, we gained a point on Man City
Perhaps Nyashnal can do some miracle @ Etihad?

Real madrid would most likely knock city out CL and end their hopes in Europe. City would be back to reality and would take the PL more seriously to ensure top 4. The best Arsenal would get from that match would be a draw and it's not gonna be enough for us.

Eastbay:
Even if that was the case, the elbow was not necessary.
Violent conduct charge to be slammed on him.

Let's hope the FA doesn't charge him. We would really him him to rescue a even a point at West ham.

SailorXY:
What happened to mathematical chance?

It's City that is only delaying the inevitable. West ham would get a result against us surely or maybe even do a good job on us. A win against norwich is not set in stone either. I have always said City and Arsenal would drop points but it was gonna be useless because we would drop more points than them and fail to gain on them.

Finishing out of the top presents the biggest chance of LVG getting fired and i'm willing to bet on that.

I have nothing to worry about. LVG would not make top 4.

Eastbay:
He wasn't punished for it so the ref didn't see it.

He's likely to be banned.

I think his hair was pulled too.

Kagawa10:
Now that I think about it, apology to codedguy1.
The Eediots who appointed themselves as your defenders really got on my nerve.

It seems codedguy1 has done a good job exposing your tomfoolery and now you have suddenly become sorry.
You are one unrepentant clown.

elampiro:
Gaal was hoping he would improve, and Wilson proved worse when given the chance. But Rooney was scoring and assiting in his last 8 matches before his injury.

Earlier in the season, you said it was because we were creating few chances for Rooney and that's why he didn't score in many PL games. Then when his form improved actually improved early this year, you revised your theory saying that we were now creating chances for him. Rashford a 18 year old who has never played professional football came and used those same few chances we created and scored goals and that's why Rooney is failing to displace him currently. Your opinion regards Rooney has always been questionable from the start.
Now does LVG wait for other players to improve like Rooney before benching them if they play poorly? Didn't Martial get moved from the CF to the left initially even when Martial was doing well in that position?

But 6 was the highest rating for any player. To me, Valencia, Martial, Rooney and Blind did very well today.

I also think to you have not been watching Leicester to know how they break fast from their midfield. If you had been watching them, you would know we did well in that department today.

Our play through the middle was very conservative today maybe due to Leceister's midfield as you stated. Is a midfield of Kante and Drinkwater supposed to be better than our's? Our midfield deserves limited credit because they had to play so conservative to contain an ordinary Leceister's midfield and that's why they created so few through chances for Rashford.

Elampiro, i think you're spot on regards Rooney today. I still find it difficult to believe Rooney had a good game. Maybe i just expect too much him (as it should be) and my bias affected my view of him. I find him incredibly frustrating and annoying at times today.

elampiro:
Rooney has not played poorly since his return from injury. Infact the two times he was substituted, our game compared. The first time, Lingard came on and we never moved forward. The second time, Herrera and Fellaini came on and we became clueless in midfield.

Earlier in the season when he was stinking up the CF position, why did LVG fail to bench him?

You will see even this rating put Rooney as one for the better performnce. This is why I said it's malicious to say he was poor. He did his job well of playing deep midfield.

It seems you didn't get my inference earlier in my previous post. I said he played badly but it was relatively better than others. That's why he got a 6 and that was higher than most players who played badly too.

SIRcumalot:
that means Valencia isn't playing well be that.
rashford played well enough that if he was on the bench the fans go complain.
nobody is crying over Herrera or Memphis not starting.

I refuse to agree with this. There's no way Rooney can play RB better than Valencia.
Let's say we even go with this as an agreement. When Rooney plays poorly, why does he not get benched like the others?

elampiro:
Only Martial rated higher than Rooney.
I knew people would bring the conspiracy of English press. English press are actually most critics of Rooney.
Look at whoscored, only Blind rated higher than Rooney. This is despite Rooney having a Yellow card which means some marks deducted. Even non English sites rate Rooney as one of the best.

I can't argue against facts but what you have stated is relative. Most rankings online are saying the whole team didn't play that well so they got poor figures and it's only relative to other poor players that Rooney appeared good.
see this from Manchester Evening News for example; http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/man-utd-player-ratings-rojo-11270025

SIRcumalot:
you go try to ignore harder be that.
our team stop revolving around for a long time now.
if only Mata or Herrera did enough to merit that position while he was out.

Yes that's the problem. Mediocrity by other players. They never do enough but regardless when they do, they would still get benched for him. LVG has claimed his captain has numerous advantages and would always play. It's frustrating that we are stuck with this guy i swear.

sinizia:
He's blaming the 2 monikers for having "coded" in their sobriquet. LMAO. This is pure comedy.

Kagawa10 never fails to entertain. I didn't label him a clown for no reason.

Kagawa10:
Well!
I just saw it now!
I wouldn't know considering I've not been here for a long time!
Both are to blame for having 'coded' in their moniker!

What kind of excuse is this? You should really be ashamed of yourself. Blaming others for your ineptitude and clownishness

sinizia:
https://www.evilenglish.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/2391064-4436741716-ngbbs.jpg
Utd don suffer.

Here's the video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zkiKcazMsTY

elampiro:
I have given Telegraph and daily mail.

Telegraph do criticized Rooney. Even daily mail criticized Rooney in the build up to 2014 world cup.

I have not seen any rating that said Rooney was poor.

Bros how often do you criticize Rooney?

sinizia:
LOL. How many crosses was it again. 47 with no tangible end product?

81 crosses and fulham defended against it so easily

I know exactly what i'm saying regards Rooney and it's not about having an agenda against him or something. Rooney performance levels has been so abysmal in recent years such average performances are labelled good and extremely frustrating are called average. The English press would only tell lies about how well he played in the midfield because Rooney has to go the Euros and there's no way they want him starting as CF over Kane, Vardy or Sturridge. That should be England's problem not United's.

SIRcumalot:
honestly if you guys keep judging Rooney from that his contract angle you will never see anything good in his game.
ignore the salary (it was a bad contract from the begin) he had a good game certainly cant see anybody on our bench doing better.

soton dey nack city may this top 4 dream never die.

Well those folks on our bench don't get paid as high as him so it's very difficult to ignore. This is what happens when you try to build your team around an average player like Rooney. That's why he gets moved so often from one position to another without anyone to permanently place him on the bench and he's the captain FFS. Mediocrity everywhere!

Kagawa10:
This happened

If you weren't such a clown, you'd have noticed that those are different monikers possessed by folks with different identities.

sinizia:
What he did would never have unlocked Leceister's defense.

What irritated me most was the attempted chip by Rooney instead of shooting. Rooney has tried that shi.t so many times and it has never come off for him he had the guts to do it again in this must win match.

sinizia:
God bless you for this. It's the embolden that would have unlocked Leceister's defense. Since our MFers lacked it, they resulted in feeding Rojo with passes only for the fool to send parabolic-esque crosses with zero velocity into Leceister's 18-yard and as always, Huth and Morgan were waiting to head out the timid crosses. It's very frustrating to watch.

Shades of that legendary match vs Fulham with Moyes in charge with so many crosses that failed.

elampiro:
I watched today's match in a large hotel hall. People said Rooney and Martial were our best players. Some non Man United fans.





Meanwhile Southampton 2 City 0

Did you watch the match or not? or you listened to the commentary from these folks? are these the same people that stated Rooney was better than Fellani today?

elampiro:
I doubt that. There was need not to be over ambitious from midfield. Carrick and Rooney always ensured they played behind the ball. They also changed the direction of play from side to side in a admirable way. Fellaini who was in the number 10 and Lingard in the right wing were the disconection in our passing.

Fellani was far more useful than Rooney today and i don't know how you always manage to praise this guy who shouldn't even be in United currently. Rooney is the highest paid player in the PL FFS. Players who get paid that much should have performances that correlate with the figure. Look at what Ronaldo, Aguero, Messi etd who bring to the table and that's why they are paid so much. Be sincere with yourself, and be stop being Wayne's fan instead of United first.

Rooney that can't even displace a rookie in 18 year old Rashford for the CF position and whose uselessness is now being accommodated in midfield and you're defending him? Do we pay him 300k every week to spray diagonal passes down the wing to Valencia?

Kagawa10:
Bastian would have if fit!
2 midfield signings isn't enough for the coach though especially when one is an 8mil punt on an experience player!

Then why did LVG make just 2 midfield signings? Whose fault is it? Regardless Bastian was average when he played.

Rojo was the poorest player on the pitch today but it's not enough reason for our failure to win the match.

sinizia:
I wish I can grab that dude's throat from my screen. How LvG will perform better with a top-4 finish is what I don't understand. This season he was in UCL and Europa League, was there ANY good outcome from both competition? I wish I was mod, I'd have banned him a long time ago.

Exactly, we are never even gonna challenge for the league next season under LVG if he stays and he's leaving after that. LVG claimed it's a 3 year process. 1st year, make top 4; 2nd year, win the league; 3rd year, CL and while the objective in the 1st year was barely achieved, we have regressed in the 2nd year and can't even reach the heights we reached in the 1st. so why should he get a 3rd year?

No be his fault sha, na Moyes wey hin replace cause am. If he had replaced SAF, his failure would have been more obvious than it is currently.

sinizia:
How is he not a fan? Coz he was being realistic that we wouldn't make top-4 and that even if we do, it's a waste of time?

Kagawa10 is a clown and he's extremely annoying. I would have to ignore him more often than not.