Goodenoch's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Goodenoch's Profile › Goodenoch's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 (of 21 pages)
toughest007:https://www.vox.com/21506029/trump-violence-tweets-racist-hate-speech |
Ticha:Thanks very much @Ticha really really appreciated. It's surprising that LI premium goes up once one claims on CIC - those insurance companies and their shenanigans to dissuade claims as much as possible sha. Things are much clearer now. Thanks |
Lexusgs430:Chief, sorry to bring up an old post but what do you think about critical illness cover as part of the life insurance (intended primarily to cover a mortgage)? We're definitely getting LI, but broker has suggested everything including income protection, CIC, life insurance (decreasing) so I'm trying to figure out what's essential. We're also almost certainly getting CIC as well but trying to figure out if it should be separate from the life insurance or additional. We're both well (me less so haha) under 30 and in the public sector for now so I think overall chances of needing income protection is very low but I don't want to be penny-wise, pound foolish. Any insights welcome, please. |
jedisco:Exactly. Send the freight money. Donate the clothes to Salvation Army or another charity here. Simple. Salvation Army even has bins around in many large towns/cities that you can simply put your clothes into without even interacting with anyone. |
missjekyll:Because I meant virtually. Because it is virtually. Because although the laws generally apply universally, there are still some differences, although most people wouldn't encounter them. Do you understand now? |
missjekyll:No. I was referring to human rights, as the conversation was centred on an oppressive regime where people were deprived of those based on their race. In the UK, the HRA, the EA and sundry laws that provide for human rights apply universally regardless of citizenship. Or have you been deprived of any human rights because you weren't a citizen? Tell us. |
jedisco:Your comparison to apartheid is utterly absurd. The fact that you would equate an oppressive regime like that with the UK just shows how out of touch and entitled you are. There's no compulsion, there's no violence and you have virtually all the same rights as native brits (moreso than brits would have back in your own home country and I daresay more than most natives of your own country have in their own home country even) yet you're comparing the country to apartheid South Africa? |
kumbhuru:Okay, senior nurse. |
kumbhuru:You live in a hotel? https://ms.hotels.com/en/ho3288768096/crow-hill-house-tranquil-escape-hideaway-cleethorpes-united-kingdom/ Edit: Lol. Just saw someone already exposed this senior fraud with his fake photo. |
You people on this thread sef 🤣 |
Time to keep score: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cml2en8xlxko Labour's manifesto tracker. |
Jamesclooney:Unfortunately all I can see between those lines is the dark background. Is there something else? |
Jamesclooney:It's not because of a congratulatory message. Both Labour UK and Nigeria are affiliated with and primarily funded by (some would say they are offshoots of) labour unions in those countries and those organisations are themselves affiliated internationally (via the ILO, etc.), so it's natural for them to work together. |
kwakudtraveller:Okay. |
jedisco:"Not quite as popular". Everything you've said is irrelevant to the point I made about how the popularity of temporary vs permanent travel varies greatly between the UK and say, Nigeria. I understand why you like to think it's a matter of perception because it soothes your ego and boosts your victim complex but Google the figures (actual figures and also per capita) of people who permanently migrate out of those countries annually and compare. |
missjekyll:It would be cruel and unusual if people were compelled, but If you read your own post, you'll see that the first action word there is 'going' - not 'being dragged away', not 'forced to go', not 'strapped into a plane and compelled to go work as a care worker in the UK'. Nobody is being made to make their children grow up without them. People already in the country were exempted. Others have the full agency to CHOOSE. The country wants people who can work in care but not additional family members because they want to keep immigration figures down, so they've set out their conditions. People who are single should apply - those who aren't should not. It's the same thing with study visas. Some undergrads are married and have kids. Some masters students too. But most countries don't allow those people bring their families along, so if you're in that category you can choose to go to a country that does, or travel on a visa that allows you to. Stop doing this classic leftist SJW culture of low expectations thing of infantilizing people and making it seem like they have no agency and everything they do, it's because they were forced and nothing is their responsibility etc. etc. BTW in Nigeria, foreign work permit holders can have their married spouses with them but not their partners, even if they've been together for years, decades, etc, have children and clearly have their whole lives together. How's that for cruel and unusual? |
missjekyll:In a church, they should avoid religion, abi? The pastor might just have been asking from the perspective of wanting to understand the new member's outlook - will they be here for a long time or are they say, students, who'll be here for a short period? There are myriad reasons why he might have genuinely enquired, without any of the malice you're insinuating, but now you're saying sorry to this person as if the question dealt him serious emotional damage. It's somehow amusing but also sad to watch snowflakes in action. People literally walk around looking for things to be offended by nowadays. |
babajeje123:You do realize that some people ask this question without any malice, and simply based on their own mindset that people generally go to places to visit, work, study and then return home? Permanent emigration is not quite as popular and embedded in the public psyche among Brits as it is among people from certain other countries. It's the rare exception rather than the norm. Not saying you or anyone else isn't right to be irritated when asked that question - it's up to you to gauge the intent behind it in specific situations, etc, but painting the question itself as something inherently offensive and automatically getting your panties in a twist when you encounter it just isn't right. |
awumen:First, you'll need to be more specific about what guidance you're seeking. Second, your workplace outside the UK is loaning you 100 to 200k Pounds to buy a house in your name? Is the loan secured? If so, against what? What's the repayment plan? Either way, it'll raise so many red flags when the conveyancers are doing anti money-laundering checks, it'll look like an Albanian football stadium. You'll need an extremely solid and evidence-backed explanation, and the best place to start is to find solicitors to advise you. |
toughest007:House ventilation does vary though. In my current house from where I'm typing this I have a window in front of me and have direct line of sight (so 180 degrees) to another window on the other wide of the house through an open doorway, so I can achieve cross ventilation by opening both windows. Where I previously stayed, I couldn't do that. Search Google and you'll find many guides on using cross ventilation to cool homes in the summer so clearly the concept is quite well known and people practice it. Also, portable ACs and ACs generally are pretty uncommon whereas fans are very common, so clearly they must be working reasonably well, unless you want to say everyone just likes to roast in heat and doesn't know what cools their home, unlike you. |
AgentXxx:You need to make sure you stick very closely to your organization's HR policies. Ask HR for assistance and take their advice to the T. The last thing you want to do is make it seem personal. It's not your company and it's not your time and it's not your personal business, at the end of the day. When you speak to HR or to him or to anyone else, don't make it about you having to pick up his work (although you can cite that), make it about the effect on your team/service and how that's affecting your customers/service users/other teams/the overall business. Don't get into an argument with this person. Put everything on paper and send via email to him or your supervisors/HR etc. If he's late with work, ask him why by email. If he has not closed a ticket, follow up via that same platform etc. For emphasis, the most important thing to do is don't make this about you on a personal level. Do everything you can to avoid that or you'll find yourself defending against allegations of bullying and discrimination that everyone knows are nonsensical but will not say due to needing to seem politically correct, and you may end up being thrown under the bus by your organisation. |
missjekyll:Weren't you the one saying just a few days ago that people change and evolve when you were explaining your own conversion from capitalist to socialist? |
Cyberknight:Exactly. I’d personally never work as a doctor for 33k. Yes, the top end salary is very high as a consultant but only about 25% of doctors become consultants and that’s after a decade or so. Working hours aside, what of the risk to life, and even the emotional distress? They deserve a lot more than that and anyone saying their demanding more is because of greed needs to try their jobs for a while. For someone smart enough and hard working enough to be a doctor (as a Brit without immigration restrictions especially), there are much easier ways to earn a consultant’s salary by your 40s. |
Ladyzain:You’re getting paid per hour and for time in transit. That’s NOT volunteer work. Doing it while receiving maternity pay would be fraud with consequences ranging from being asked to resume/repay the OMP you have received, or suspension/dismissal. Not worth the risk. Don’t do it. |
Zahra29:Extremely interesting that their plan to fund all of this and fill the shortfalls is very literally a footnote here. I have read the full statement on their website on how they'd raise the funds and it's similarly vague with a lot of bashing 'bureaucracy, red-tape, quangos, consultants etc.' but very little in the way of actionable plans. It all sounds very similar to the promises on Farage's Brexit bus. Arguably, the knowledge that they'll never actually have to put up is arguably part of what's fuelling these outlandish promises. |
missjekyll:I find it very interesting too. Labour currently isn’t in its best phase generally and from an immigrant standpoint but go say one will vote for Reform in particular due to that is just funny. Imagine going to vote for one of these Reform candidates: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usV9RhxZhVs Or this guy whose policy in an article he published is to deport all immigrants from 1997 and have their families shrieking and crying https://hopenothate.org.uk/2024/03/21/far-right-fantasies-of-reform-uk-candidate-beau-dade/ Or these dudes, one of which; surprise surprise, is of Nigerian origin : https://hopenothate.org.uk/2024/06/08/more-weird-and-worrying-reform-candidates/ |
Peerielass:But it is a discount. We buy cars and houses and whatever else from already taxed income. That argument doesn't mean anything and doesn't show why private education should be VAT exempt. The fact of the matter is that the vast majority of parents cannot send their children to private schools. If you can, you're 'well to do' far above the average whether you consider yourself wealthy or not or whether you're making sacrifices to do it or not. Same as parents sending their children to Covenant University are almost universally going to be doing much better than the average parent of kids at UNILAG. In principle, there's zero reason why the government and general public should be subsidising what is essentially a luxury (because private school parents not paying VAT costs the entire country via the loss of the funds that could have been raised, and therefore result in lost services or increased tax elsewhere). Now, one valid point you've made is about how kids leaving private schools could lead to lots of pressure on public schools but the counter argument will be that funds raised from VAT on private school fees will pay for expanding capacity in state schools. It's not even clear that so many people will leave private schools. There has been conflicting data on that from what I've been reading, e.g. https://taxpolicy.org.uk/2024/06/02/independent_schools_misleading_vat/ |
missjekyll:You genuinely believe that testosterone and weight are the only differentiators in this scenario? As in, honestly and not just for social media argument's sake - you genuinely believe that? |
Zahra29:There's nothing to add to this really. That first sentence in bold? I've said it to many people time and time again. And just to add about stereotypes and discriminatory attitudes, I challenge anyone to go take a look at any front page thread on this same Nairaland, and then come to talk about British racism. Doesn't matter the subject, every single thread degenerates into vile ethnic mudslinging, and it's so normal there's a whole culture around it. And it's not just online either, but let's not go into that. |
directonpc:I know SEVERAL people who came into the UK around that time and are now in VERY high paying jobs. Even on that same LinkedIn you’ll see several people who moved from studies to working at top companies. People just don’t write posts about getting visas, so there’s some confirmation bias, understandably, but spend some time checking through the profiles of people announcing that they’re starting new roles and you’ll see that many are recent masters graduates - at least speaking based on my network on there. About the global talent visa, I hope you know the primary purpose is for people looking to establish tech businesses right? Also, talking about tech careers slowing down, have you seen the state of the tech industry in Nigeria today? How do you think people in there are faring? Also, have you seen the news of tens of thousands being laid of by tech giants in the US and other countries? You too honestly assess what you are saying: you’re complaining about graduate visa because it’s time limited. You’re complaining about skilled worker because it’s employer restricted. Now you’re still complaining about the global talent visa that’s not tied to any employer and has practically automatic renewal up until ILR. What exactly do you want the government to do - start tech companies that’ll employ just immigrants? The economy is in trouble (globally) and everyone is feeling it. It’s not an immigrants thing alone. |
Paxziano:I'm assuming your new role is HEO based on the salary unless you're in London. You can go for SEO roles after some time - say, a year, or port to the NHS where you should be able to get a COS on a band 7 up role. Will take some effort but it's doable, especially if you have a graduate degree. |
directonpc:There are unemployed and under-employed indigenous brits as well, many of them also qualified in various industries and having a range of skills. The fact that some people don't get ideal opportunities is unfortunate but that doesn't negate Reesheesuknack's point that there are myriad ways that the government has created to enable immigrants work and earn very well in the country, as well as benefiting the country too obviously. Another one is the recent flexibility they introduced on the skilled worker visa, which some people would like to downplay because it doesn't fit their negative narrative. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 (of 21 pages)