₦airaland Forum

jesusjnr:
So maybe you're trying hard to be a copy cat then, or a fake?

jesusjnr:
No new ideas?

Becoming very predictable and boring.

jesusjnr:
Yes oh, I be the olodo 1234567890 timus uncountable timus for the small pikin oh.

Chair this kind olodo wet I be oh, I never see oh.

My head dey for ground for the small pikin oh just like three wise distinguished scientific astronomers from the east.

We are olodo together with her.

jesusjnr:
Hahn you know, I know you know the truth, but don't worry I know what you are waiting for, and very soon you will have it so that you have no umbrella to hide under.

goodnewscliff:
u shudnt have typed tbis...... its gone way too farrrr..... this is bigger than u think!!!!!!!

jesmond3945:
blasphemy

mhd5757:
This is blasphemy.

oyatz:
You are in league with the Devil for this your blasphemy.

Repent now and seek God's forgiveness.

cigaricon:
Lord forgive him for he knows not what he's doing

HungerMustGo:
Is porn star asking for prayer.... ??










I mean prayer to get well......??









An continue doing porn.....??

vaxx:
lol.....what do you want to hear.

vaxx:
myself, myself, and my ancestors

vaxx:
i served the gods of my ancestors

vaxx:
There are many, it depends on which one will certainly satisfy your curiosity.

murder is a criminal case and hence may developed gradually, even finger print is not enough this day, since evwrybody knows how to wear gloves.what they do is swab everything they can find for DNA. Whic are gradual process. Most crimes are committed by repeat offenders, and if you’ve been convicted of a crime any time in the last 12 or so years your DNA is on file with the authorities. Running the DNA gives them a very short list of suspects, and that lets them focus only on specific people who might be their guy. Once they can do that your evidence would have to be both perfect and unbreakable. Which are all gradual process.

That is it, even police interpret murther case diffrently, God evidence can never be one way. Since evidence can be interpreted in many analogy.

it is only nonsense when the evidence given to you does not meet your expected requirement. For some, they are satisfy with what they have at disposal.

GlorifiedTunde:
What!?

Freeze just got an order


I don't even think Americans can be swayed like blacks ...

Harryfrosh:
Yam Porridge for breakfast

heddiebanks:
The drink wasn't supposed to be there.

johnydon22:
Ideological regurgitation. That's not even remotely close to what i am saying.

Do what exactly? To be sure what we are still talking about.

Interestingly, no theist played that card. If they did, I'd refute it just the same.

Perhaps a different thread. A debate thread for you and i specifically?

Exwizard:
Ok noted sir

johnydon22:
nnaa ogbeni no be small thing o. She's 6'4, I'm quite taller than she is

johnydon22:
This can be said for the atheist who simply regurgitate everything Dawkins and his likes say without thought.

This doesn't mean every theists do this. Your argument was a hasty generalization which is an evidence of a heuristic style of thinking.

So, there are no human convictions that transcends theism then?


Same can be said for the other side. You can literally replace the word theist here with atheist ans it will still be valid, nairaland is a typical example



Yes. Only that bringing up arguments that is attainable on both sides and implies it as sole theistic inclination is dishonest and should be corrected..

Lol.

1. I said one of the reasons, making the one bold so it is not mistaken.

2. What do you mean ability to survive?

3. Actually, human capability to think up and believe in imagined order is a fundamental reason for their survival and dominance - this is easily demonstrable. Want a go at it?



An argument can be made on the contrary

johnydon22:
Even from a commonsensical point of view, a creator of a system should be able to interact with this system unless he chooses not to. (The nature of this Interaction however can be arguable)

lorhema:
Some people are into the business. That is why you hear about people who own snake farms. They suppy snakes to foreign institutions which produce anti-venom.

vaxx:
The atheist comment here are laughable .

To suggest that theistic arguments are weak is to dismiss the capability of philosophical and theological heavyweights from Augustine to Maimonides to Aquinas to Erasmus to Descartes. To suggest the arguments of these figures are weak is to suggest many of the greatest thinkers in history were philosophically inept - is beyond absurd. It is utterly clear, at this point, that you are measuring the strength of an idea by how much you agree with it.

There are plenty of rock solid arguments for the existence of God, but some of them need to be developed gradually like a complicated court case.

Some theistic arguments are weak sure, while some are very strong but some atheists just lack the rational capacity to understand them. Both represent the poorest end of a richer narrative

kiddoiLL:
Yea I know you were that's why I said it could be a business idea but close to impossible in this Naija, due to d procedures and requirements.. I'm not sure the government will license anybody to have a snake farm in naija

johnydon22:
Does a God with the capability to interact has the choice of deciding not to?

There are two types of both deistic and theistic Gods in terms of interaction.

1. A God that can interact but chooses not to

2. A God that cannot.(do not have the capability)

Which of these two options is more likely?