₦airaland Forum

Jonasbadoo:
Thermodynamics is not hard na

well I didn’t understand it then and it was more for mechanical and chemical department

EzeIgboNwaChukwu:
in which school

CU

Wizklynd23:
Man Thernodynamics I gave me tough time.. I managed to get B Sha..

i cant forget that thermodynamics also. i did not understand that steam table at all and my CA was nothing to write home about. after the exam i just left my course mates praying behind chapel. i went to buy ewa g but i also got B

well it is a good idea but i want drop an opinion.

let me ask a question why does the country send their citizens to jail? people are sent jail so they can be rehabilitated. when in jail they teach them how to be morally right. so imagine if i can pay someone to serve a certain percentage of time in jail then when will i learn how to be a good person.

mozona:
she doesn't have a boyfried.

i can beat mt chest for that

well she has a boyfriend who finished with 4.89

well i feel this is your personal opinion. But your opinion does not make any form of sense. your creation story is just as false like that of the christian creation story you're trying to refute. I think you should study more and read better books, rather than listen to stories from one drunk man under the tree.

i am really happy for motunrayo!

wow i am really shocked how she got A in some courses like 220 and thermodynamics when most of us were hoping of just passing

OpenYourEyes1:
Examples of beneficial mutations?

Albino no longer produces melanin. The pigment protects us from sun. Sun still shines on earth.

see no mutation is beneficial.

But the lack of melanin won’t make them go extinct

OpenYourEyes1:
You probably don't understand natural selection.

These codes don't "die out". Mutation can cause a change in gene code but such changes are mere mistakes that are never beneficial.

if the mutation is beneficial for the organism survival then it would live.

I do not see how albinism is bad sha

OpenYourEyes1:
Ofcourse, they can. People with mutation reproduce like normal people. These mutations continue to appear in all generations. This totally contradicts the natural selection model.

Albinism shouldn't appear at all (or should eventually dissappear) in Africa for example, if the theory is correct.

what type of straw man fallacy is this ? Natural selection doesn’t care if the mutation is good or bad. As far as the mutation is beneficial to the organism.

Albinism is the lack of black pigment ( melanin £ in the body. So I don’t see how and why they should go extinct. I think you don’t understand NS

OpenYourEyes1:
So why do albinos, sick cell carriers, dwarfs etc still exists.

can they reproduce?

OpenYourEyes1:
Natural selection aka "survival of the fittest". Do you totally agree?

when Darwin said "fittest" he did not mean strongest rather he meant organism that can pass down its gene from one generation to another.

yes i totally agree

OpenYourEyes1:
Could you explain Natural Selection?

Natural selection is a scientific theory that best explain evolution. As General relativity explains Gravity.
NS is a key mechanism of evolution, it is the change in the heritable traits characteristic of a population over generations. it explains how complex life came to be without any intelligent Designer.

you could read more on it on reputable science journals

The Bone of contention is “ do you have any evidence for the ID”?

budaatum:
Why? Are you assuming you can't learn everything about the intelligent designer? You know that'll mean you're kind of not intelligent, right? Or that the intelligent designer didn't put the artificial intelligence model in you!

I don't agree you can't understand. You just being lazy!

Then if we humans can understand the intelligent designers design. Then he’s not as intelligent has you claimed.

EmperorHarry:
Lol..Would it be the case if I found evidence to prove ID?

God hasn't made a case for itself just yet.Human influences or interpretations of God and "God said" is pretty much human logic impersonating ID.
If a product of human intelligence could complain,let's say a car or a generator,it would make the same case we make now against our intelligence.Perhaps it exaggerated our intelligence or neglected the possibility that we're confined to make the best out of the materials available to us? Would the ills that befall these machines discredit the intelligence of it's inventor? Perhaps it's the fault of the invention in search of an objective model of perfection,created illusions to fit it's subjective model of it's inventor? Who's fault is it now?

EmperorHarry:
Like I said earlier,I have no proposed evidences you haven't known already and probably dismissed.I can only assure you that when I'm convinced by a discovery I find important,I'll let you know.

You could even win a Nobel laureate if you find one evidence to disprove natural selection.

So if god was wrong about where humans came from, then he’s definitely wrong about where we’d end up after death. Meaning god is not omniscient or intelligent. Then why call him god or the intelligent designer?

So you’re an eagle?

MissTechy:
We are covenant generation pursuing excellence

EmperorHarry:
Sadly I can't provide you solid objective evidence.Your view of the world has being clouded by natural selection,so it's futile to provide evidences that are aren't overwhelmingly obvious.

my view on the world is based on OBJECTIVE FACTS if you give me evidence for your ID and it goes with many experiment, and it is also peer reviewed then i would acknowledge. But if you want to use Logic or common sense to support your premise then i am sorry i would not even take a look at it.

Evolution was first proposed by Lamarck without natural selection as a fundamental mechanism. Flawed theories were the result in the end until Darwin revised evolution using natural selection.It sounds more plausible but relies on way too many assumptions when adapted to illustrate evolution from simple to complex organisms.The finger of natural selection is very plausible when comparing living things within similar categories which is what it thrives tbh.It still doesn't explain consciousness in humans tho among other important questions. So the fact is science accepts evolution through natural selection because of the short chain similarities within a family in the taxonomic ranking.It's with this supposed evidence they use as a basis for extrapolation.This doesn't mean they can't just be chasing winds.
Here's why I pleaded with you to be open minded.You still sulk in your bias towards ID.It's all good tho.

there are some hypothesis working on how consciousness evolved. okay this is a religious section so i am not going to flood it with much scientific terms. All higher organisms (Homo sapiens, chimps, bonobos, etc) are all conscious animals. so this appeared to be directly proportional to the complexity of the animals brain.

[s]Abiogenesis depends on evolution which is still under construction[/s].Natural and artificial influence aren't the same thing.Artificial influence on natural phenomena is susceptible to fine tuning.

how does the start of something depend on the end

This is a beautiful piece from johnydon22.

EmperorHarry:
Very true,but what if evidence sits right in front of you? ID without religion holds pretty much no water.Religion has privileged ID with a place in human history without much scrutiny.So it's pretty much just an assumption when separated from religious influence.It is most fascinating independent of religion.Interpretation of an ID becomes subjectively limitless.

. well i have not seen any evidence for the intelligent designer. i would like if you could give me some.

Natural selection isn't foolproof Hakeem. It's like an assumed master keys in the hands of science but somehow there are doors that the keys doesn't fit.There are doors with watchmen that collect and fling the keys into depths of the unknown.I trust science tho,to pick the locks and wrestle with strongmen so as to gain entry into closed doors but until then Hakeem,keep an open mind lest what lies behind those doors be the same knowledge you seem so apprehensive towards.Abiogenesis is more flawed than ID.If you can entertain the idea of Abiogenesis,why can't you do same for ID?

well if natural selection was flawed like you claim, it would not have passed any peer review and many scientist would not acknowledge it. Even if NS was flawed it wont still make creationism right.

now Abiogenesis is a hypothesis that tells us how life started ( it could be wrong though) but its plausible. The miller urey's experiment shows that abiogenesis is actually plausible. And since god did it is more of a religious claim than a hypothesis.

EmperorHarry:
Thank you..Please let Hakeem4 be drilled by this truth so he doesn't arm himself with inappropriate weapons when fighting(Refuting and disproving) against ID.
The intelligence often associated with a higher being is exaggerated.A careful examination of the ills found within the world around us is a tip that the world isn't perfectly made.The universe is flawed but that doesn't mean a designer isn't intelligent.

well ID is not a serious position to hold cause there’s no evidence to back the premise. Well natural selection explains how we have complex life so I do not see the need for any ID except you talk about the origin of life and we have a hypothesis called abiogenesis

No god created all animals male and female and he saw everything was pleasing in his eyes. He then created Adam from sand . Then he created eve after some time. So the bone of contention is why did god forget to create eve while he was creating Adam.

delishpot:
God did not create woman to be under the dominion of man. He created woman cos

* He saw that Adam was lonely and needed a hand around the garden - Gen 2:18 It is not good for man to be alone, I will make him a help mate) note not severnt, maid or worker but help mate to support his life and to have dominion over all things with him. An assistant.
* It was God's intention for a man to leave his mother and father and be 1 with his woman - Gen 2:24 (o support his life as he moves around. An assistant.
* He wanted continuity of the human race - Gen 1 :26-31(Be fruitful and multiply)

No where in the creation story did Adam or God suggest that Eve had a lower status. The only things that dominion were given to Adam were other creation besides Eve.

Now, as to where Eve fell and was placed below Adam was after they ate of the tree of good and evil aka tree of knowledge Gen 3:16 That is the verse where God now said her "husband" note the word husband not every man, not all men, but specifically husband will rule over her.
As I see it. I think those curses are just added to the text to justify the stress of life and family hierachy cos of Adams curse is general and applies to both genders ie Men and women struggle for daily bread, men and women return to dust.

So God did not in the beginning have it the way it is in mind.

Wow I actually didn’t think of it this way.

Well it’s not sinful. Wait!!! Who take the watch tower journal serious ?

Well I don’t pay tithe so I would give him.

But if I was a Christian I won’t give the beggar cause I can’t tamper with god’s plan for his life. Before god sends me to hell fire for changing his plan

Thank you very much

chilewenwam:
Great Job.

AntiWailer:
Who mathematicians in the context u are reasoning help ?

well it’s very help in your everyday life. It’s useful in engineering and sciences. The phone or computer you’re using was designed using some mathematical model. Almost everything around us revolves around mathematics

Eyah! I really feel for the student.

Well physics is more like the foundation of any scientific course. So I’d advise you to write the dans again if you’re really interested in science.

axeman2:
Please Nairaland Which Science Course Can I Study Without Physics I Fail Physics In My Ssce

babtunns:
Please, Its been long ago I have this orientation that eating to church on Sunday is not good. I just want to ask is it biblical or just ordinarily.

better eat before going to church Incase the pastor elongates the service.

How do design steel connection on staad pro connect edition




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5kJ72LUpsQ&t=187s

Whether na slave to sin or slave to righteousness. You’re still a slave. Why don’t you just enjoy your brief moment of existence thinking by yourself rather than allow an old book do the thinking for you.

LordReed:
LoL! What makes my posts seem like I have been a long time unbeliever?

Well the way you’ve been attacking believers as if you’ve never been one