₦airaland Forum

BOOOMNAIJA:
Big lips sef wan trend....shuu!

1Sharon:
You say he is useless. Is Adam not your fada?

destinyy23:
Glorified secondary schools.

tobidipity:
GTB Bleep up jare. Na salary earners alone dem dey give the loan. Access bank gives anybody regardless of what u doing

bluke:
they lost their colonies cos they were defeated in the 2 world wars

engrchykae:
but the inferior Jews are running the show.
that was how Hitler arrogantly declared war on Russia of all people.
a wolf declare war on the bear.
that single careless action is Hitler arrogantly's worst decision.

According to Chief Agbakoba, “We are not saying that work should stop on 2nd Niger Bridge, but we are saying that the Project Director Mr. Wieser, must leave, he does not have regards for the host communities and does not have manners of approach to the communities and above all, he is exhibits racist behaviours and we can no more tolerate that.

Abdulgaffar22:
If lawyer decided to believe in an alien as the creator of human being, then we can still refer that alien as the "god" of the lawyer. In that case, the lawyer is no longer an atheist.

Yes, atheism is not science. But science of evolution provide a refuge for the atheists in the sense that it makes them not to worry again concerning how they came to exist. So atheism and science of evolution are closely related

As agreed by all scientists, the probability of harmful mutations being occurred is far greater than that of beneficial mutations. Therefore, a GREAT number of beneficial mutations ( like those require for the transformation of lower to higher species of life ) must be accompanied by corresponding GREATER number of harmful mutations.
In other words, before hundreds of beneficial mutation can become fixed in one place, thousands of harmful mutations would have been implanted elsewhere and before thousands of beneficial mutations can become fixed in one place, millions of harmful mutations would have been implanted elsewhere.
This is exactly the reason why lower species cannot mutate to become higher species .

The reference you quote up there is talking about theistic evolution i:e evolution that has been guided by God from the beginning. It has nothing to do with natural evolution we are discussing.



The only reasonable thing I can find on the reddit you referenced goes thus;

"RNA knows which strand to copy because it finds the sequence of code that says "Here's a gene to read", termed a promoter, which causes an RNA polymerase to bind to the strand and transcribe the code in the 3' to 5' direction, creating mRNA, until it reaches a sequence that tells the polymerase to stop."

But this has not answered my question. This is because every strand of DNA to be copied has its own "promoter" which enable RNA polymerase to bind to the strand. This implies that there are many "promoters" for different strands of DNA.
So my question can now be rephrased as follows; how did RNA polymerase RECOGNIZE the "promoter" of the strand to be copied during the process of transcription of a particular DNA strand ?

Here is the analogy; you are being asked to go and copy a particular information on a particular page of a voluminous encyclopedia. The "promoter" is just like a page number where you are going to see that information. But if you are not told before hand that the information you're looking for is on a particular page, how are you going to recognize that actual page out of many pages of the encyclopedia ?

This parallels the question that says how did RNA polymerase manage to recognize the "actual promoter" of the strand to be copied out of many promoters meant for the different strands of DNA ?

Abdulgaffar22:
Before a sincere lawyer can resolve within his mind that there is no God, he must have possessed an adequate explanation on how he himself and all other living things came to exist. Otherwise, the belief of such an atheistic lawyer would be base on ignorance and self desire; not on concrete and good reason

But mutation is the back bone of evolution. Without mutations causing variations, natural selection has nothing to act upon. Natural selection only explain the "survival" of the fittest. It does nothing in explaining the "arrival" of the fittest. Yet the new species have to arrive before they can survive.
You're asking me about the information I was referring to. Don't you know that before a simple life forms like bacteria can be transformed into higher life forms like cockroaches, additional new genetic information is required ? So how did evolution manage to source for this new information ?

I have gone through your references, they did not answer any of my questions. But if you believe they do, then just quote the answer to my first question that says;
how did RNA polymerase manage to RECOGNIZE and COPY the required little information out of the bank of information contained inside the DNA ?

CandidSeeker:
...And your name is Hakeem?!

Abdulgaffar22:
I am not here to ridicule any body or any theory. But to establish facts.

Are you not an atheist ? Do you believe in any supernatural being ?

If new genetic information require for macrevolution is not by random process of chance ( DNA mutations), then how did such information originate ?

Your ignorance is at peak

Don't you know that the events of protein synthesis I explained up there are also part of the events involved in mitosis and meiosis ? Without the production of new set of proteins, new cells produced by mitosis and meiosis cannot exist.

DoctorAlien:
What is science?

He is wrong of course, for the design in the universe is real, not apparent. Furthermore, can you think of a more damaging doctrine to teach the next generation than the one Dawkins espouses? In the minds of those who succumb to its tenets, such thinking divests them of any basis for ultimate truth, knowledge, morality, or human dignity and value.

caringheart:
Yes

Hier:
God is a spirit, yes

ochibuogwu5:
YES!!!

Lovelash:
YES.

Abdulgaffar22:
What did I say about natural selection that is wrong ?
Do you have any natural process through which DNA information can undergo a change other than mutations ?
Then am I wrong by saying most mutations are harmful and rarely beneficial ?

Do you think I forget how you later ran away when I asked you to give me a logical reason why robbery is not personally good for me ?

martyns303:
If a company needs you, they will go extra mile to get you.

solite3:
it is still the same blind faith that you have.
How could you believe evolution when you were not there?

my faith has evidence.
Nobody can believe something without evidence either percieved or real.

EmperorHarry:
Faith is required when dealing with things,knowledge, concepts etc independent of our senses& self.Faith becomes delusional when you refuse to accept any alternate perspective that doesn't align with yours.

solite3:
why do you spend time discrediting what is not real.

If you say faith is delusional, then love, patience or anyother quality is delusional.

Every new invention requires faith it will work base on some principles set in place.

Without faith you cant even live.
You are delusionsal if you drink water without checking if it was poisoned.
You are delusional if you believe your husband, parent boss or workers are real and not cloned.
You are delusional if you believe you have a heart without ripping it your self to check.
You are delusional if you breathe in air without checking if it is a real air you are breathing and not some synthesize air meant to make you a zombie.

In fact you are delusional to even think people are the one replying you and not robot.
You are in serious delusion.

Atheism is supidity