Hardebaryor's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Hardebaryor's Profile › Hardebaryor's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 23 pages)
 Foreign Affairs › Re: Have Libyans Made A Huge Mistake By Removing Gaddafi? by Hardebaryor(m): 11:50pm On Oct 27, 2020 |
chamber2:  They now have the freedom |
| Politics › Re: Pictures : Lessons From Libya Before And After! by Hardebaryor(m): 11:00pm On Oct 27, 2020 |
Lol...EndSARS. We were almost near destruction |
| Politics › BREAKING: Five #endsars Protesters Shot Dead In Ibadan (graphic Videos) by Hardebaryor(op): 2:40pm On Oct 20, 2020 |
Five #EndSARS protesters have reportedly been shot dead in the Ojoo area of Ibadan, Oyo State. According to reports, the protesters were shot by the soldiers, while the police station in Ojoo has been set ablaze. https://thestreetjournal.org/2020/10/breaking-five-endsars-protesters-shot-dead-in-ibadan-graphic-videos/ |
| Literature › Re: The Bang Rule Pdf File Pls by Hardebaryor(m): 3:08pm On Sep 29, 2020 |
kokakola:Please I need the book. My Gmail is ibrahimkukar2@gmail.com |
| Romance › Patriarchy Didn't Create Gender Roles. Nature And Necessity Did. by Hardebaryor(op): 9:59am On Aug 14, 2020 |
Patriarchy didn't create Gender roles. Nature and Necessity did. Gender roles created patriarchy. Ask any female around you their criteria in choosing a man.. Financial stability will be number 1 or 2... Who can provide for them.. No matter how much they earn even. "Love me for who I am" is meant for only women...King, that's not for you.. Sorry. Male feminists, They told you the movement is for both gender, you accepted 'wifenotcook", You accepted "wifenotnanny".. Cool. now you're getting bullied for asking them to share bills.. Meaning they want all the gender expectations and roles gone.. For them.. But for you.. You still have to continue with yours. If you as a male child you wake up one day to tell us how; Your mum cooking for you guys when you were young was all Patriarchial and oppressive. But you think your father slaving all his life to provide your needs and that of your mum was Normal and him performing his duties.. You've been brainwashed by the online gender war veterans. "Oh, fathers only gives money and pay bills" Without money you won't have shelter, comfort, good Health, clothes, formal education.. Your dad gave you all of that and more too.. You didn't see that as oppressive because you got brainwashed to see the sacrifices of men as 'romantic', "being a man ", "being a father figure" and performing his duties.. But the sacrifices of women as "slavery ', "oppression " and whatnots. You ask yourself, how come different societies with no prior contacts practiced same settings for hundreds of years?.. Patriarchy. Your father didn't oppress your mum.. Your father never had it easier. Patriarchy wasn't created to oppress women by men. Patriarchy(maybe no more needed) was created by nature and necessity, enjoyed by both men and women... And suffered by both. Good morning. Taopheeq Olaitan https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=2677898169133815&id=100007409736134 6 Likes 3 Shares |
| Health › Re: How To Last Longer In Bed - For Men by Hardebaryor(m): 10:15am On Aug 06, 2020 |
Edoblakky:Hello sir, pls is it required that my penis get erect before I can do this exercise? |
| Romance › Re: Yoruba Men: Why Are You Obsessed About Dating Igbo Girls by Hardebaryor(m): 5:26pm On Jul 03, 2020 |
Because they are full package |
| Romance › Re: "Invest In Your Woman, So She'll Be Too Expensive For Other Guys" by Hardebaryor(op): 11:16am On Jul 03, 2020 |
9jausedauto:Read the content bro |
| Romance › Re: "Invest In Your Woman, So She'll Be Too Expensive For Other Guys" by Hardebaryor(op): 11:16am On Jul 03, 2020 |
paulolee:Read the content bro. |
| Romance › "Invest In Your Woman, So She'll Be Too Expensive For Other Guys" by Hardebaryor(op): 9:50am On Jul 03, 2020 |
"Invest in your woman, so she'll be too expensive for other guys" A statement manufactured by manipulative assholes and leeches.. And been celebrated by hopeless simps. "Invest in yourself, so when she's leaving. You can get a lady 20x better than her and tell her to go to to hell ".. There l fixed it. Normalize loving men for who they are. And not for how much they can can spend massaging your overbloated ego.. Date a Woman that adds values to your life not a liability.. They all have vagina" You're the prize homie. Always remember that. You're not an alternative for anyone.. Be a king. Never open your wallet to keep a woman. Only open your wallet out of generosity.. Not to buy love. (There's a difference) If she belongs to the street. . She belongs to the street.. Even if you're Dangote.. You still can't keep her. A King you were born.. A king you should be. Always! By Taopheek Olaitan from Facebook 6 Likes 4 Shares |
| Romance › Re: A Quick Test To See If You've Been Infected By The Feminism Virus! by Hardebaryor(op): 6:36pm On Jul 01, 2020 |
CAPSLOCKED:Really? Tell me more. |
| Romance › A Quick Test To See If You've Been Infected By The Feminism Virus! by Hardebaryor(op): 1:18pm On Jul 01, 2020 |
A quick test to see if you've been infected by the feminism virus. If "women! Respect men" sounds misogynistic to you But "men! Respect women" sounds ok.. You've been infected. If the story of a man changing tyres for his wife on 3rd mainland bridge at 1:00am sounds romantic to you. But The story of a woman cooking for her family at 1:00 am sounds like oppression. You've been infected. If "I don't like short men" sounds like choice to you But I don't like fat women sounds like bodyshaming to you.. You've been infected. If men receiving much money than Women in sports sounds like patriachy to you. But Women receiving much money than men in modeling and porn industry sounds like girl power to you. You've been infected. If more than 80% of CEOS and MDs being men sounds like patriarchy to you But More than 99% of sewage workers, coal miners and mortuary attendants being males sound ok to you. You've been infected. Another name for hypocrisy is modern day feminism. By: Taopheek Olaitan (from Facebook) Lalasticlala! 11 Likes 3 Shares |
| Romance › Re: Playing The Victim Card by Hardebaryor(m): 1:07pm On Jul 01, 2020 |
Why are this kind of posts not moved to the front page? Lalasticlala! |
| Islam › Re: Muslims The "Chosen People" Of GOD? If Not, Then Who Are? by Hardebaryor(m): 8:12am On Jun 26, 2020 |
tintingz:wow. You were even a Muslim. What a sad loss! |
| Romance › Feminism: The Philosophy Conundrum � by Hardebaryor(op): 11:43pm On Jun 25, 2020 |
Does both sexes posses the same natural capabilities❓ "What a man can do, a woman can do better" right or wrong❓ Should the women be restricted to take some tasks❓ Are women to be symbolized as sex objects❓ Literally and putting it simple, feminism is just a movement tussle for "equality of power" and freedom between males and females. Either to liberate and protect a part of the gender (esp females) from molestations and harassments or to fight against the notion of placing a particular gender over the other. �♂️ But is there an absolute equality between these two gender❓� Actually, life is in essence, characterized with variations and one major example is that in the specie of Homo sapiens (humans)....�♂️ Due to little but yet significant difference in steroid hormones, we have physiological differences among humans leading to Male and Female.... However, this physiological differences is very important, it shapes us...I mean everything about us, not only the reproductive system but in fact, our brains � This physiological difference is the principal factor behind the general social convention we have about a male and female... Most people think it's the society or culture but in actuality, it's all within us.... naturally, the differences in the hormones speaks for itself...�♂️ Due to the differences.. 1. A male has a more bone and muscle mass than females.... 2. A males has larger lungs females... 3. A male have strong ventricular walls than females 4. the brain of a male has ability to withstand more stress than female. With all of these, you still think both genders posses the same natural capabilities❓�♂️ The difference is there,we can't help....the logical thing is, if it's a task that involves so much emotional and physical stress... it's advisable a female should stay away from it... This is why culture and social conventions are right when they feel the man should do the most of the work instead... nevertheless, it doesn't not mean a lady shouldn't work as far as it's not hazardous to her �♂️ A female child can go to school...in fact, females have a bigger hippocampus to store informations in their brain more than male � A lady should have a job, even though primarily, it's meant for the guys but as far it is not hazardous to her, so why not❓�♂️ Although...the females are better in parenting than males and thus should spend more time at home...why❓ ...because of the following features of the brain of a female... It has posses high emotional response. Females have low testosterone which enables the emotional site of the brain to be active...and produce high level of oxytocin (a loving and caring hormone) �♂️ On the sexual harassment part....� Women are created to be anatomically successful than men...they are just a beautiful creation...❤️ Using the testosterone analogy again, the hormone issa badass for men �... it's responsible for lust and its level increases exponentially...so if triggered, they lose it and their prefrontal cortex responsible for thinking...shuts down...�♂️ Men can't help it by nature.... it's fallacious for you to say, a man should try to control himself because what will control him (prefrontal cortex) has been shut down...�♂️ So it's better you don't do anything to lead him on... that's just it � Feminists argue that sexual violence committed by men is often rooted in ideologies of male sexual entitlement and that these systems grant women very few legitimate options to refuse sexual advances. Well, looking at it closely...the entitlement is on both side...how❓ The biological success of every human is to reproduce....and if any of the gender will have to reproduce, he needs the other, that's the law of nature...�♂️ You need each other to carry the specie on...� Though, if for sexual desires...in marriage, that's why you have your partner and if you don't, get one❗or you masturbate �♂️ Being a "feminist" is fallacious to me.... being a "humanist" is better �♂️� By Opatola Abdulmujeeb adedamola |
| Islam › Feminism? Not Scientific! by Hardebaryor(op): 10:49pm On Jun 25, 2020 |
Candace Owens, a victim of feminism lamented at the Young Women Leadership Summit (2019) saying: "I learned too late that feminism was a scam. Today, I'm 55, I'm unmarried, and I've passed the age I can have children. I have to take medicine to help keep me happy and my medication. That is the scam of feminism. If there is anything I could go back and do; I would have warned myself against the scam of feminism." Merriam Webster dictionary defines feminism as 1: The belief that men and women should have equal rights and opportunities, 2: Organized activity in support of women's rights and interests *Similar Terms:* #women liberation #womanism #Feminism #gender equality #Equalism Without an iota of doubt, the feminism idea is antithetical to major world religions, more particularly - Islam. The feminist concept is alien to the Muslim world. In fact, it is not wrong to consider the term "Muslim feminist" as a suitable example of a paradox. With only a few Qur'an verses, the feminism propaganda is utterly deconstructed, and a "Muslim feminist" may have to choose between Islam and feminism. Certainly, the two beliefs are mutually exclusive. However, in this modern age, it becomes pertinent to resist the feminism movement not only from theological approaches but also via appropriate scientific criticisms. This often reveals why the call to "gender-equalism" is unnatural, irrational, and dysfunctional. Thence, this article seeks to flaw the growing trend of feminism activism vis-a-vis a science-based approach. 1. Human biology Agitating for 'equality of gender' is like crying over the spilled milk. Naturally, both physical and physiological features of the two sexes differ a great deal and no amount of surgery or transplants can make a woman become a man (and vice versa). Each sex was designed to perform specific but complementary roles toward achieving the general goals. If gender binary is truly a social construct as claimed by some feminists, why shouldn't the campaign include "Say no to Female Menses," because the male counterpart is free of periodic menstrual discharge? In addition, none of their campaigns has ever featured "Men must carry a pregnancy," at least to share the antenatal burdens. The point here is; if you can't fight against the natural difference in sex, then why protesting against the difference in rights and responsibilities. According to Aurora Sola' (a pro-feminist): "The feminist project has been worn down by the anti-scientific attempt to sweep sex differences under the rug, and we have misguidedly set for ourselves the goal of equal representation in certain attractive professions." 2. Physics - electricity Before electricity can become useful, two dedicated pairs of the cable must come together, each performing specific roles. The live wire (+ve in battery source) carries current to the appliance while the neutral wire (-ve) completes the circuit and carries current away from the appliance. Practically, if men and women should have equal rights and play equal roles, instability sets in. Rather, a gender-based division of labor guarantees high productivity at a reduced cost. 3. Automobile vehicles In moving a vehicle, the driver controls the wheel. Any attempt to wrestle the steering with the driver leads to an accident. Passengers cum passers-by can only be of a guide. Similarly, a man is socially designated as the family head in most cultures, he steers and moves the family. Wives and children can only make inputs where necessary. This brings about decorum and minimizes confusion. Emulating the "driver-passenger" relationship is sacrosanct for peace to reign. A family where husband and wife enjoy the same rights and perform similar roles can never be progressive even if such marriage is sustainable. 4. Sports - Soccer In football, we're yet to find a team of 11 men playing against a team of 11 women in the same tournament. The same goes for athletic, boxing, and wrestling games. On the contrary, what we find is women wrestling with men over juicy administrative posts. This gives the impression of the fight against gender discrimination to be absolutely selective. When will FIFA allow men and women to play football together? In replying this question, www.quora.com states: "Never. Unfortunately, you can say what you want about gender equality and all that, but Men are much fit physically than women. Look at the Olympics for example. Watch the Men’s 100m sprint final, it’s faster than women’s 100m final. Watch the weightlifting. Men can lift heavier weights than women. If men and women were allowed to play together, nothing would change. I’m sure some of the top elite females would make it into lower league teams, but the top leagues would remain 100% male. Sorry feminists." 5. War and Armed forces Perhaps, the feminists' battle for equal rights and opportunity is limited to selective areas of interest. Currently, men still dominate the military forces of every nation. It seems the feminists fear death, they prefer men being on the danger line. The statistics of women in the biggest armies around the world shows China: 5% India: 3% U.S.A: 16% Russia: 10% Nonetheless, a larger proportion of women serving in the military are consigned to medical work and desk jobs, barred from ground combats. In an article titled "Gender inequality in the military service," Joao Carlos and Sofia Menezes noted as follows: "Recent scientific research has evidenced that women still represent a growing minority in most Western militaries. Women’s integration deserves equal opportunities across all branches and levels of responsibility in the military, however, their expansion to ground combat roles is still a challenge to the military and policy-makers." Summary: Feminism emerged as a social struggle seeking to protect the rights of women regardless of cultural and religious standards. More disappointingly, the philosophy of the movement is irreconcilable with natural and scientific facts. The claim that men and women must be accorded the same rights and opportunities in every aspect of life is far from reality. Besides frustrated females and indoctrinated males, who else embrace feminism? By: Abu Mar'yam Hanafi Abdulkadri |
| Romance › Feminism? Not Scientific! by Hardebaryor(op): 10:33pm On Jun 25, 2020 |
Candace Owens, a victim of feminism lamented at the Young Women Leadership Summit (2019) saying: "I learned too late that feminism was a scam. Today, I'm 55, I'm unmarried, and I've passed the age I can have children. I have to take medicine to help keep me happy and my medication. That is the scam of feminism. If there is anything I could go back and do; I would have warned myself against the scam of feminism." Merriam Webster dictionary defines feminism as 1: The belief that men and women should have equal rights and opportunities, 2: Organized activity in support of women's rights and interests *Similar Terms:* #women liberation #womanism #Feminism #gender equality #Equalism Without an iota of doubt, the feminism idea is antithetical to major world religions, more particularly - Islam. The feminist concept is alien to the Muslim world. In fact, it is not wrong to consider the term "Muslim feminist" as a suitable example of a paradox. With only a few Qur'an verses, the feminism propaganda is utterly deconstructed, and a "Muslim feminist" may have to choose between Islam and feminism. Certainly, the two beliefs are mutually exclusive. However, in this modern age, it becomes pertinent to resist the feminism movement not only from theological approaches but also via appropriate scientific criticisms. This often reveals why the call to "gender-equalism" is unnatural, irrational, and dysfunctional. Thence, this article seeks to flaw the growing trend of feminism activism vis-a-vis a science-based approach. 1. Human biology Agitating for 'equality of gender' is like crying over the spilled milk. Naturally, both physical and physiological features of the two sexes differ a great deal and no amount of surgery or transplants can make a woman become a man (and vice versa). Each sex was designed to perform specific but complementary roles toward achieving the general goals. If gender binary is truly a social construct as claimed by some feminists, why shouldn't the campaign include "Say no to Female Menses," because the male counterpart is free of periodic menstrual discharge? In addition, none of their campaigns has ever featured "Men must carry a pregnancy," at least to share the antenatal burdens. The point here is; if you can't fight against the natural difference in sex, then why protesting against the difference in rights and responsibilities. According to Aurora Sola' (a pro-feminist): "The feminist project has been worn down by the anti-scientific attempt to sweep sex differences under the rug, and we have misguidedly set for ourselves the goal of equal representation in certain attractive professions." 2. Physics - electricity Before electricity can become useful, two dedicated pairs of the cable must come together, each performing specific roles. The live wire (+ve in battery source) carries current to the appliance while the neutral wire (-ve) completes the circuit and carries current away from the appliance. Practically, if men and women should have equal rights and play equal roles, instability sets in. Rather, a gender-based division of labor guarantees high productivity at a reduced cost. 3. Automobile vehicles In moving a vehicle, the driver controls the wheel. Any attempt to wrestle the steering with the driver leads to an accident. Passengers cum passers-by can only be of a guide. Similarly, a man is socially designated as the family head in most cultures, he steers and moves the family. Wives and children can only make inputs where necessary. This brings about decorum and minimizes confusion. Emulating the "driver-passenger" relationship is sacrosanct for peace to reign. A family where husband and wife enjoy the same rights and perform similar roles can never be progressive even if such marriage is sustainable. 4. Sports - Soccer In football, we're yet to find a team of 11 men playing against a team of 11 women in the same tournament. The same goes for athletic, boxing, and wrestling games. On the contrary, what we find is women wrestling with men over juicy administrative posts. This gives the impression of the fight against gender discrimination to be absolutely selective. When will FIFA allow men and women to play football together? In replying this question, www.quora.com states: "Never. Unfortunately, you can say what you want about gender equality and all that, but Men are much fit physically than women. Look at the Olympics for example. Watch the Men’s 100m sprint final, it’s faster than women’s 100m final. Watch the weightlifting. Men can lift heavier weights than women. If men and women were allowed to play together, nothing would change. I’m sure some of the top elite females would make it into lower league teams, but the top leagues would remain 100% male. Sorry feminists." 5. War and Armed forces Perhaps, the feminists' battle for equal rights and opportunity is limited to selective areas of interest. Currently, men still dominate the military forces of every nation. It seems the feminists fear death, they prefer men being on the danger line. The statistics of women in the biggest armies around the world shows China: 5% India: 3% U.S.A: 16% Russia: 10% Nonetheless, a larger proportion of women serving in the military are consigned to medical work and desk jobs, barred from ground combats. In an article titled "Gender inequality in the military service," Joao Carlos and Sofia Menezes noted as follows: "Recent scientific research has evidenced that women still represent a growing minority in most Western militaries. Women’s integration deserves equal opportunities across all branches and levels of responsibility in the military, however, their expansion to ground combat roles is still a challenge to the military and policy-makers." Summary: Feminism emerged as a social struggle seeking to protect the rights of women regardless of cultural and religious standards. More disappointingly, the philosophy of the movement is irreconcilable with natural and scientific facts. The claim that men and women must be accorded the same rights and opportunities in every aspect of life is far from reality. Besides frustrated females and indoctrinated males, who else embrace feminism? By: Abu Mar'yam Hanafi Abdulkadri |
| Romance › Feminism? Not Scientific! by Hardebaryor(op): 10:24pm On Jun 25, 2020 |
Candace Owens, a victim of feminism lamented at the Young Women Leadership Summit (2019) saying: "I learned too late that feminism was a scam. Today, I'm 55, I'm unmarried, and I've passed the age I can have children. I have to take medicine to help keep me happy and my medication. That is the scam of feminism. If there is anything I could go back and do; I would have warned myself against the scam of feminism." Merriam Webster dictionary defines feminism as 1: The belief that men and women should have equal rights and opportunities, 2: Organized activity in support of women's rights and interests *Similar Terms:* #women liberation #womanism #Feminism #gender equality #Equalism Without an iota of doubt, the feminism idea is antithetical to major world religions, more particularly - Islam. The feminist concept is alien to the Muslim world. In fact, it is not wrong to consider the term "Muslim feminist" as a suitable example of a paradox. With only a few Qur'an verses, the feminism propaganda is utterly deconstructed, and a "Muslim feminist" may have to choose between Islam and feminism. Certainly, the two beliefs are mutually exclusive. However, in this modern age, it becomes pertinent to resist the feminism movement not only from theological approaches but also via appropriate scientific criticisms. This often reveals why the call to "gender-equalism" is unnatural, irrational, and dysfunctional. Thence, this article seeks to flaw the growing trend of feminism activism vis-a-vis a science-based approach. 1. Human biology Agitating for 'equality of gender' is like crying over the spilled milk. Naturally, both physical and physiological features of the two sexes differ a great deal and no amount of surgery or transplants can make a woman become a man (and vice versa). Each sex was designed to perform specific but complementary roles toward achieving the general goals. If gender binary is truly a social construct as claimed by some feminists, why shouldn't the campaign include "Say no to Female Menses," because the male counterpart is free of periodic menstrual discharge? In addition, none of their campaigns has ever featured "Men must carry a pregnancy," at least to share the antenatal burdens. The point here is; if you can't fight against the natural difference in sex, then why protesting against the difference in rights and responsibilities. According to Aurora Sola' (a pro-feminist): "The feminist project has been worn down by the anti-scientific attempt to sweep sex differences under the rug, and we have misguidedly set for ourselves the goal of equal representation in certain attractive professions." 2. Physics - electricity Before electricity can become useful, two dedicated pairs of the cable must come together, each performing specific roles. The live wire (+ve in battery source) carries current to the appliance while the neutral wire (-ve) completes the circuit and carries current away from the appliance. Practically, if men and women should have equal rights and play equal roles, instability sets in. Rather, a gender-based division of labor guarantees high productivity at a reduced cost. 3. Automobile vehicles In moving a vehicle, the driver controls the wheel. Any attempt to wrestle the steering with the driver leads to an accident. Passengers cum passers-by can only be of a guide. Similarly, a man is socially designated as the family head in most cultures, he steers and moves the family. Wives and children can only make inputs where necessary. This brings about decorum and minimizes confusion. Emulating the "driver-passenger" relationship is sacrosanct for peace to reign. A family where husband and wife enjoy the same rights and perform similar roles can never be progressive even if such marriage is sustainable. 4. Sports - Soccer In football, we're yet to find a team of 11 men playing against a team of 11 women in the same tournament. The same goes for athletic, boxing, and wrestling games. On the contrary, what we find is women wrestling with men over juicy administrative posts. This gives the impression of the fight against gender discrimination to be absolutely selective. When will FIFA allow men and women to play football together? In replying this question, www.quora.com states: "Never. Unfortunately, you can say what you want about gender equality and all that, but Men are much fit physically than women. Look at the Olympics for example. Watch the Men’s 100m sprint final, it’s faster than women’s 100m final. Watch the weightlifting. Men can lift heavier weights than women. If men and women were allowed to play together, nothing would change. I’m sure some of the top elite females would make it into lower league teams, but the top leagues would remain 100% male. Sorry feminists." 5. War and Armed forces Perhaps, the feminists' battle for equal rights and opportunity is limited to selective areas of interest. Currently, men still dominate the military forces of every nation. It seems the feminists fear death, they prefer men being on the danger line. The statistics of women in the biggest armies around the world shows China: 5% India: 3% U.S.A: 16% Russia: 10% Nonetheless, a larger proportion of women serving in the military are consigned to medical work and desk jobs, barred from ground combats. In an article titled "Gender inequality in the military service," Joao Carlos and Sofia Menezes noted as follows: "Recent scientific research has evidenced that women still represent a growing minority in most Western militaries. Women’s integration deserves equal opportunities across all branches and levels of responsibility in the military, however, their expansion to ground combat roles is still a challenge to the military and policy-makers." Summary: Feminism emerged as a social struggle seeking to protect the rights of women regardless of cultural and religious standards. More disappointingly, the philosophy of the movement is irreconcilable with natural and scientific facts. The claim that men and women must be accorded the same rights and opportunities in every aspect of life is far from reality. Besides frustrated females and indoctrinated males, who else embrace feminism? By: Abu Mar'yam Hanafi Abdulkadri 1 Like 1 Share |
| Romance › Is It Really Seduction Or Is It Just A Fancy Name For Sexual Harassment? by Hardebaryor(op): 9:22pm On Jun 06, 2020 |
It was when I tried modelling one time that I understood that male sexual harassment is a thing. Na just say men no dey talk. I mean, shame no go gree dem say another man sexually harass dem. Look at this trending Solomon issue on Twitter, all the males recounting made sure to mention they could have beaten him up but blah blah. Dem no wan appear weak or victiminized. One time I visited this guy, some guy who just came into the country. He now reached out and twisted my nipple at random. I just burst out laughing like a mad man. I was too amused to even remember to be offended and disgusted. I just found it amusing. Like, See this soft soft guy o. The guy was looking at me and I was laughing and looking at him like, Nigga are you alright ? And no, I didn't hit him or anything. I just played it cool and sat down. I later left and didn't reply his messages again. The truth is, this consent thing, even women shouting about consent don't understand it. Because the mentality of women, Naija women, is that men should be grateful to be offered sex. That a man always wants it. That if you "seduce" them, they will give in. Most of what people call "bottom power" or "feminine wiles" is actually harassment. You can't say you understand consent and think it is okay to force your body on someone and call it "seduction". You are shouting teach your sons this, teach your sons that. But what are you teaching your girls? Consent is a two way street. Unless you are already sexually involved with someone, you have to understand that you are not entitled to their bodies. No matter how "hot" you are. No matter how "irresistible" you think your yansh is. Guys won't say it, their male pride won't even let it register to their brain that they were sexually harassed, but it is what it is. Throwing your body in someone's face isn't right no matter the gender. If a male friend visits you then takes off his shirt and start doing some belly dance or moves close to you and just casually begins to rub his body against yours, even if you like him I am sure you would findit creepy and intrusive as f. You would think there are better and more polite ways to come on to someone. You would feel harassed and even afraid. So turn the tables, why would it be okay for women to do that to men? Why is it called seduction when women do it and harassment when men do? It should be equal. Because women don't have the muscle to enforce their will doesn't make them any less abusers. And please before you comment, understand that I reserve the right to refuse to entertain comments that derail off the subject matter and go into gender bashing. Written by: Hymar Idibie David from FB https://www.facebook.com/100000865297273/posts/3194778077227671/?app=fbl Lalasticlala 1 Like 1 Share |
""And fight them until persecution is no more, and religion is for God. But if they desist, then let there be no hostility except against wrongdoers. Let there be no compulsion in religion: Truth stands out clear from error: whoever rejects evil and believes in Allah hath grasped the most trustworthy handhold, that never breaks. And Allah heareth and knoweth all things. (The Noble Quran, 2:256)" "Say : O ye that reject Faith! I worship not that which ye worship, Nor will ye worship that which I worship. And I will not worship that which ye have been wont to worship, Nor will ye worship that which I worship. To you be your Way, and to me mine.(The Noble Quran, 109:1-6) if u want more i will give u, Islam prohibit killing and bloodsheding, those who do so are ignorant of the holy Quran.