₦airaland Forum

anonimi:
The hunger and extreme poverty from unemployment, insecurity, bad roads etc no be here.


www.nairaland.com/attachments/4180477_1392483210143001453357818500537568220443822n_jpeg744fcdbcdbc4f5b147d46800faffe62b


www.nairaland.com/attachments/4154190_foodprotectionbuhari_jpegc1990d1e353277144a6e91114e752e25

SolutionMee:


Femi needs to be very careful with the way he talks to Mr President. Assuming the "hate speech" bill has been signed, this is how Femi would have ended his entire life and political career (if any) just like that.

More also, Buhari is not all that bad has people portrayed him to be. To be a reformed democrat should require nothing less than a decade. With time, this "serving father" will make some quality decisions that's going to benefit the masses. We just have to give him enough time (probably a third term or so). There was a time I was elected as the class rep of my high school back home. It took me three (3) terms before I started performing. Assuming that my class members were impatient souls like the Nigerian populace, that's how they would have been denied of the privilege of good leadership.

Angelcoco:
Meet me at Garki. I currently protesting

EMILO2STAY:
try looking for this book or download a short p. D. F version online. And got to YouTube and search for flat earth by Eric Dubay, he has a six hour video on flat earth proof.

EMILO2STAY:
if you believe that a himawari is taking pictures of a ball from beyond low earth orbit which NASA has admitted they haven't reached yet, then good luck with your belief. Besides the image you posted is a joke if you think that looks like an oblate sphere or a pear Niel degrass tyson was talking about..

EMILO2STAY:
why do you keep beating about the bush, the flat earth truth is not new to the world, what is new is the globe earth lie. There were flat earth maps before any globe earth map it has nothing to do with religion. Every tribe and nations believed the earth to flat. The globe earth lie is only about 500hundred yds now, but since the beginning of time man has always believed the earth to be flat and stationary.

There is nothing like it was edited for contrast. It is photoshopped. The several pictures of earth from all these space stations prove all the images are photoshopped. if you say otherwise then you are just being biased. Like I said man has not been beyond low earth orbit so how did they manage to get enough distance to to get a clear shot of the earth from space??.

I know all the so called proofs of the ball earth and have debunked all. All the experiments done to prove the sphericity of the earth has failed but instead proved it to be flat and stationary.
You think I have always believed the earth to flat? No! I once believed it to be a ball just as they said. But the evidence doesn't add up plus it doesn't make sense and also doesn't explain why every thing on the earth stands upright instead of side ways or upside down.

If you say it is not possible to see the curvature from the surface then why do ships disappearing across the horizon seen as proof of the curvature of the ball earth?. Why does the horizon stay on the eye level on a plane even when it get to more than 35000ft an ocurrance which is not possible on a curved surface. How does water stay on a ball? How does the vacuum of space meet with the non vacuum of earth , do you know anything about thermo dynamics or enthropy?? . How does the ISS move in vacuum of space?? How come air plane fly level on the earth till they get to their destination with out having to curve at interval to account foe the curvature. If bullets accounts for the rotation of the earth, how come airplanes flying at a more slower speed does not account for the rotation, how come aircraft flying from east to west get to their destination at the same time as the one flying from east to east if the earth is rotating counter clock wise?? Oga pls go and do a proper research and stop wasting my time. If you think I have not approached this the scientific way then you have not been reading my post. I did not even approach it on a religious way for you to say I am more religious than scientific that an ignorant statement. They give you different version of the earth with different colors without the so called thousands of satelites orbit it and you believe, telling me it was edited for contrast.

AlphaStyles:
I thought it was only outside people that knows how to smuggle into NIGERIA guess what we too know how to smuggle

SaintLucia:
Bye Bye to PDP Fuel Scarcity Season. Thank you Bubu, last year the IPOB wailers said there was no fuel scarcity because of 2019 election. I wonder what the same wailers will now say now that election is gone.

Racoon:
Guess this man said "Nigerian roads are not bad as they're being portrait"? So which roads is the government repairing.Just as he lied that Nigerians now enjoy stable electricity.The double speaking nature of these people is legendary e.g.

EMILO2STAY:
there is not a single true image of the earth. All are photoshopped. There is a documentary titled ""a funny thing happens on the moon"",. In that video, you could see how buzz aldrin, Michael Collins and Neil armstrong were shown to be given instructions on how to fake the picture of the earth by blocking out all the lights in the aircraft and allowing just a small rounded opening in the window of the aircraft. This was taken as the first true image of the earth from space. Every single image of the earth you see today are faked. Robert Simmons aka Mr blue marble admitted this. They have not even gone beyond low earth orbit so how do they get the enough distance from the earth to take a picture. Pls use your head. All space agencies in the world have a version of their own earth and they all look different why is so? Because it is all photoshopped. There is nothing like the earth is a ball but not a perfect ball or the earth is pear shaped but you can't see it with your eyes. Then How do they know? Their always come up with silly excuses that has nothing behind it except assumptions which they clearly made up.

EMILO2STAY:
like which one?

EMILO2STAY:
they make up excuses to explain away irregularities with their globe earth model. First they said the earth is a ball till today it is still shown as a ball with perfect circle in circumference. But when people realized the earth is wider in circumference as you go south, they came up with the lie of the earth beeing oblate in shape and depressed around the poles. Another lie is that the earth is pear shaped. This is because it was realized that the earth is wider at the south pole than at the north pole.

Now if they make this claims why have they not shown you a picture of an oblate earth or pear shaped earth from space, Where you have hubble telescope and ISS?

ZombieTERROR:
Let's all bow our heads together and mourn democracy in Nigeria ...

Died on May 29 2015....
Buried on May 29 2019...

Rest in peace democracy...
So long

EMILO2STAY:
very good videos. Now compare those images of mercury or venus to the one NASA shows you. You will find that NASA gave you CGI.

EMILO2STAY:
the reason why they lie I have stated over and over.

EMILO2STAY:
oga why do you keep beating about the bush. Stars are simply celestial bodies that give off light. The wandering stars are so called because they aren't fixed in their constellation like other stars. The earth isn't tilted 23.4 °, that is a lie. They said that because the north pole star "Polaris" can be seen from 23.4° latitude, knowing it is impossible to be seen on a ball from that angle they came up with the lie that the earth is tilted.

EMILO2STAY:
oga why do you keep beating about the bush. Stars are simply celestial bodies that give off light. The wandering stars are so called because they aren't fixed in their constellation like other stars. The earth isn't tilted 23.4 °, that is a lie. They said that because the north pole star "Polaris" can be seen from 23.4° latitude, knowing it is impossible to be seen on a ball from that angle they came up with the lie that the earth is tilted.

EMILO2STAY:
what are you talking about guy? I don't doubt that these cannot be seen! My arguememt is that they should not be seen in the night if they orbit the inner most circuit of the solar system.

EMILO2STAY:
oga leave matter for Mathias. There is no difference between the stars you see at night from the one's you call planets, they are all stars. When viewed from a private telescope or a Nikon p900 with over 300x digital what you see is different from the pictures you have been presented. Why will other stars be called suns while the brightest stars are called planets.

Somtimes in new York city the so called venus will be seen up untill 9:36 pm. How is that possible if they orbit the inner circle of the solar system?
Planets should not be shining like a star, but venus is even shining brighter than some stars and they said it is not a star but a planet. These things were called wandering stars before ever they were called planets.



The picture below is from stellarium

BeLookingIDIOT:
Quotes from pseudoscientists you mean.Check out the universities the so-called scientist are in.

EMILO2STAY:
to believe the flat earth cosmology, you have to disbelieve the globe earth cosmology. In the flat earth cosmology there is no space. The earth is the center of the universe.

There are so many problems with the globe earth cosmology, and that is because it is all a lie. Like I said before the problem with lying too much is the fact that you do Not know when you contradict your self.

It is often said by heliocentrist that venus and Mercury can be seen at night with a telescope. But they forget that these two so called planets orbit the inner most circle of the solar system which faces the sun so therefore they cannot be see at night because the earth will be facing the dark side of the the solar system at night. Guess they forgot about that because heliocentrism is not just a lie but it is a big lie.

EMILO2STAY:
First of all what you see are known as the wandering stars. There is not a thing to suggest that they are planets. Planets should not be giving off light in different colors. Like I said before, heliocentrist claim that these planets which orbit closer to the sun are seen at night, if according to their solar system theories they should never be seen at night since they orbit closer to the sun. Why should you even see them at five when you have not seen the the suns light?.

FOLYKAZE:
Thanks for the headup. I live in Ondo state though and would see if I can see the venus. Will give it a trial this week.

FOLYKAZE:
I have been trying to find it but can't identify it among the million of stars.

Is there any specific feature that one can use to identify this is venus and this mercury, not stars?

FOLYKAZE:
Can this observation be carried out in our obodo Nigeria?

I will like to see those planets.

How and when can I see venus and Mercury pls?

EMILO2STAY:
to believe the flat earth cosmology, you have to disbelieve the globe earth cosmology. In the flat earth cosmology there is no space. The earth is the center of the universe.

There are so many problems with the globe earth cosmology, and that is because it is all a lie. Like I said before the problem with lying too much is the fact that you do Not know when you contradict your self.

It is often said by heliocentrist that venus and Mercury can be seen at night with a telescope. But they forget that these two so called planets orbit the inner most circle of the solar system which faces the sun so therefore they cannot be see at night because the earth will be facing the dark side of the the solar system at night. Guess they forgot about that because heliocentrism is not just a lie but it is a big lie.

kkins25:
I am a relativity enthusiasts, kindly tell me what you know corncerning relativity.. you also habe dodge my questions. Why?