Ibime's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Ibime's Profile › Ibime's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 1679 1680 1681 1682 1683 1684 1685 1686 1687 (of 1717 pages)
Echidime:This attitude is exactly what lost you the war in the South-South. Which Okrika, Opobo, Andoni, Ogoni, Eleme, Bonny man is going to let Ibo man claim Rivers State as part of them? You must be joking. Just say that there are some Ibo migrants in Rivers and Delta state, not that Rivers State is Ibo land. The day you guys try that shit against Ijaws is the day you will see shege cos we don't play that. |
Like I said to Ako: "Jackal's name does not even deserve to be in the same sentence with Dayokanu and Debosky". . . .any attempt by him to lump you in that category is pure cronyism. . . . . if na lie, go and canvass opinion on Nairaland and tell that person to come back here and tell me different. . . . . . . anofia. |
Still specialising in insulting people in the fanciest language possible, I see. . . .if not for the last sonning I gave you, I would open another debate on factual issues, but I know it would only descend into farce because you prefer personal attacks to actually discussing matters of factual importance. . . . that is why your arguments always span 3 or 4 days. . . . I know your style. . . it is the style of 'diss me, I diss you'. . . . nothing of any actual importance. . . .lest you start making mistakes again. Nigga, even if you google for three days straight, you could not hold the type of conversation I had with Dayo today. . . . cos those shits aint on google. . . . we actually lived that shit. . . . |
'first' or 'one of the first'. . . . . which language did I use? Pull it up from the archives then. . . . bloody liars never change. . . . still twisting the story I see. . . . little boy, you know nothing about football. |
Hannibal:No - you make blatant mistakes - the type of mistakes that someone makes when they did not watch the match. Last time we argued, you made 8 glaring mistakes. Hannibal:Idiots always try to twist the truth to suit their own ends. Till today, you have never caught me out on any mistake, so you must try and twist the truth. I said that France were one of the first teams to employ 4-2-3-1 and they did until the quarter-final with Italy. This 3 midfielders you are talking about started in the quarter-final when Karembeu came into the midfield. Before that, he had only started against Denmark (and in a 2 man central midfield behind Zidane). Stop twisting the argument. Carry go. . . . you are a kid as far as football is concerned so I am not gonna waste my time cos I no get time for your long argument. |
hahahahaha. . . . . . . the cronies strike back. . . . . na una get una own time sha. . . . .I'd rather discuss football with real officionado's who lived through it, not fakers like Jackal who cannot hold an argument without making ten mistakes, despite all his googling - or Ako who would ask me if I know that SAF once kicked a football boot in Beckhams face. Those questions let me know that you are new to European football. Please stick to your Sutin Stars, don't argue European football with me. FYI Ako, lemme tell you why living in England means that your questions are silly. It is because of your view from Naija. It is myopic. When SAF injured Becks eye, that was on every front page, even the womens magazines. Even in fashion magazines. SAF's hairdryer treatment is legendary and is well known by everyone in this country, male and female. Ask Ryan Giggs and Lee Sharpe. The fact that SAF hated Posh is well known by my mother and grandmother. Jaap Stams revelations in his autobiography was well covered on every front and back page and everyone knew that is why Fergie sold him. The only question of any basic merit there is Wenger's admission that Walcott has not progressed - and that was only in response to statements William Gallas had made earlier to the same effect. So please, remember where I live before you ask silly questions. I don't even need to be a football fan to know the answers to your questions, therefore they are silly. |
dayokanu:Yes indeed. dayokanu:Forget Cosmin Contra of AC Milan. Cosmin Contra of Alaves was the best right back in football in 2000/2001 with Zanetti and Cafu. I don't know how he lost it at AC Milan. He seems to have recovered some of that skill. I saw his goal against Bayern in UEFA Cup this season. Even as a Bayern fan, you gotta bow for that goal. Do you remember the name of the Spanish striker who transferred from Alaves to Milan in 2001 with Contra. I don forget. From 1999-2002, Vieiri was the most scary striker in World Football. I used to live near Brimingham and managed to get ticket to the last ever Cup Winners Cup final between Lazio and Mallorca at Villa Park in 1999. I tell you, Vieiri looks scary live. Defenders were pissing their pants. That was the time when Dani, Lauren Etame and that mixed race Spanish midfielder (from Equitorial Guinea) were at Mallorca. Carlos Roa was also in goal for Mallorca, shaking like a fish. That was his last game before he retired from football because his pastor told him that the World was going to end on New Years day 2000. Remember that incident? dayokanu:Yeah. That was the day I stopped supporting Inter. Ronaldo also left that summer so that ended my love affair with Inter. dayokanu:Lars Ricken scored with his first touch in the final. . . . classic goal. To be honest, I don't know how Dortmund won CL that season. dayokanu:Little Buddha was the shit back then. He should have never gone to Lazio. He wasn't physical enough to play anywhere other than Spain. Dayo, Do you remember final game of 2001 season, Barcelona vs Valencia. Barcelona were 5th and Valencia were 4th so Barcelona needed to win to qualify for Champions League. Rivaldo scored longe range freekick, then Valencia equalised. Overmars scored from Rivaldo's pass, Valencia equalised again. With three minutes to go, Rivaldo then scored overhead kick from outside the 18 yard box. Everybody craze! That single game should have won Rivaldo the World Player of the year that year. I have never seen a performance like it. |
Well, you have said it all. . . . just to add my little tuppence. dayokanu:High speed but compact. The triangle system of passing was a revelation. Glad you recognise the significance of their style of play to German football. You may notice a lot of similarities between Toppmoller's Leverkusen and Ancelotti's Milan. I will let you expound on that one. dayokanu:Carsten Ramelow also covered CB when needed as well as DM. The amount of freedom allowed to Lucio enabled Leverkusen to flood midfield. Yet, they were hardly susceptible to counter attacks because they only ever moved together in tight formation. (Hence, my parallel with AC Milan) dayokanu:Basturk, Scholl, Basler, Hassler, Lincoln, Diego, VDV, Schweinsteiger, Rosicky, Hleb, Effenberg - German league always produced good playmakers despite what people think. dayokanu:People forget that Ballack could be classed as a DM at the start of his career. dayokanu:I never liked Placente because of his tendency to overlap too much. However, it worked very well at Leverkusen because Ramelow was quick to mop up and Ze Roberto would tuck inside and even help him out sometimes. The Ze Roberto, Ballack, Basturk, Schneider passing triangles were beautiful to watch. dayokanu:Vikash Dhorasoo. . . another underperforming talent to rank with the likes of Carriere and Johan Micoud. Forget Carriere of Lyon. He did his best work at Nantes. Bleep Luyindula and Govou. You should not put them in the same sentence with the above. Carriere, Dhorasoo and Micoud are just below Zidane, Dugarry set in terms of age. I remember Vialli tried to sign Carriere for Chelsea when he was at Nantes. dayokanu:Kallon and Nicola Ventola. Remember the injury crisis at InterMilan when both had to fill in because Ronaldo, Recoba (El Chinco) and Vieiri were injured? Kallon ended up scoring x amount of goals whilst Ventola flopped. At around the same time Pirlo and Mutu were offloaded on loan to various clubs and ended up proving what a fool Moratti is. (Pirlo was a striker back then). Also, Antonio Cassano and one Naija boy (I forget his name) exploded on to the scene at Bari. Cassano went on to greater things while the Naija boy disappeared. Stephane Dalmat is the greatest waste of talent ever. Total lack of discipline. When he was at Inter, he used to send a line of Limousine's to the airport to pick his friends for parties. Lived in a hotel and wasted his life. Then came to Spurs where a fight with a teammate finally killed his reputation. But as a youngster, the boy was hot. I remember how him and Robert Pires decimated Chelsea in the Champions League of 2000 for Marseille, although the match ended a draw. |
hahahaha. . . . . war don start. . . . . . I am expecting some swift volleys from Jackal and Dr Kit. Akolawole:Is this supposed to demonstrate your knowledge of football? I live in England mate. Even girls over here know about the stories you just mentioned. I expect everybody to know all this. By the way, it is hairdryer, not handdryer. Naija man just read some stories for internet/magazine think say him done acquire extra level of knowledge. Don't make me laugh. Rather, I want to know things like what you think of Klaus Topmollers coaching methods at Leverkusen. What do you know about players like Ederson, De Guzman, Aiden McGeady, Fabio Coentrao, Giovinco etc. . . . things which are not usually in the public domain. What do you think of Makaleles role as an conventional central midfielder at Nantes? Why was Eric Carriere not able to achieve a high level of performance like Zidane? Why did Stephane Dalmat throw away his career when he was the brightest prospect in France? What would have happened if FIFA had allowed Figo to move to Juventus or Parma when they were both arguing that he had signed contract with them? What do you think of the duel between Ronaldo and Del Piero in 1997/1998? What role did Pierluigi Colina play in deciding that Championship? What did Ivan Zamorano do when Ronaldo took his no 9 shirt at InterMilan? (He wore 1+ . Why did Massimo Moratti waste the talents of Mutu, Andrea Pirlo and Seedorf who went on to greater things at other clubs? Why did he sell half of Adriano to Parma when everybody could see that Adriano was a future star? Which club president described the Ajax team of 1997 as 'similar to playing the Congo' because Ajax had too many black players? (Jesus Gill, Atletico Madrid). Who did Bobby Robson want to sign for Barca instead of Ronaldo? What do you think of the De La Pena/Ronaldo partnership of 1996/1997? etc. Let us talk big boy talk, not small boy talk. Someone on here was telling me that Ikpeba had a higher profile than Sonny Anderson and Henry in 1998/1999 - and you supported him. . . . it is things like this that seperate the men from the boys when it comes to football.dayokanu:It is a compliment to you and Debo and a denigration of the kids masquerading as football officionados and being promoted by Akola. Oya, WAR START! |
Dr Kitaun:Why not tell that to Ako who would believe that Mourinho has absolutely no flaw. . . .you just agreed with me - yet, he was here arguing the fact that JM does not blame his players when things go wrong. . . . why not pull him up on that instead of agreeing with me, yet criticising me in the same breath? Akolawole:Ako, I have nothing to prove to you. . . . . . do you and let me do me. . . . . . you can raise any topic on European football from 1996 onwards and I am there. . . . . I am surprised you do not mention Nateevs and Wormy in your list. . . . . do not put Dayo and Debosky in the same sentence as Jackal and Dr Kit. . . . levels pass levels. . . . to hell with your cronyism. |
I told you guys Robinho is not worth more than £20m - £25m. This is sensible business for Chelsea if these figures are correct. |
Well BBC and Goal.com are carrying the story. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/c/chelsea/7516932.stm Chelsea make £19.7m Robinho bid Chelsea have made a £19.7m bid for Real Madrid's Brazilian striker Robinho, BBC Sport understands. In a statement on their website, Chelsea confirmed they have made an offer for Robinho, although they did not reveal the size of their bid. The 24-year-old former Santos star played a key role in helping Real secure the Spanish title last season. But he is believed to be keen to join fellow countryman Luiz Felipe Scolari at Stamford Bridge. BBC Sport revealed in July that the Blues were monitoring Robinho, although media reports that they had made a £48m bid were wide of the mark. Chelsea chief executive Peter Kenyon said on Saturday that, although talks with Real had stalled, he remains hopeful that a deal for Robinho would go through. Kenyon believes Madrid's eagerness to secure a replacement is the only factor preventing him from moving to Stamford Bridge. "A key issue over buying Robinho has always been that Real are looking for a replacement," he told the club website. "It is fair to say that is what has been holding up discussions." Scolari, who took over as Chelsea boss in July, is currently working on bringing in new faces ahead of his first Premier League campaign. Robinho has previously stated: "It would be a dream for me to work with Luiz Felipe Scolari, who is one of the best coaches in the world. "I have always spoken highly of him and he has always spoken very highly of me, since well before he was at Chelsea. "In 2003, when I was unknown in Europe, he called me to play in a charity match. It was brief but it was enough for me to see his style and character." And Robinho's agent, Wagner Ribeiro, was reported as saying in Spain: "Madrid have failed to value him as he deserves and I do not like the fact that they tried to include him in the Ronaldo deal. Money is not the problem for us now. What matters for Robinho is to leave the club and play for Scolari at Chelsea." However, Real president Ramon Calderon insisted the club was not forcing Robinho out of the Bernabeu. |
well, Robinho means Little Rob. I read today that Madrid should be willing to sell now that they have Van Der Vaart. Link to the story please. |
http://odili.net/news/source/2008/aug/7/310.html [center]EFCC seeks to seize illegal assets of president, others [/center] [center]Written by Tordue Salem Thursday, August 7, 2008 [/center] The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), has proposed a law to the National Assembly to allow it forfeit ill-acquired assets of a sitting President and other political office holders. The Chairman of the EFCC, Mrs. Farida Waziri who presented the draft Bill to the House Committee on Drugs, Narcotics and Financial Crimes yesterday at the New Complex of the House of Representatives along with United Kingdom crime consultants, Mr. Martin Polaine and Alvinder Sambai, said if passed the Law would help ease the seizure of stolen wealth. She regretted that though the Commission had catalogue of cases against certain highly placed individuals, action could not be taken against them, because of their relationships in high places. “Some two years back we had high profile cases of cases involving highly placed people with ill gotten assists, who were going about freely within the country and abroad but could not be prosecuted and their assets could not be seized due to one reason or the other. “So I am talking about assets that are movable and immovable, invisible and visible. For three years their trial has not commenced when the EFCC filed the cases against them.” She said Mrs. Waziri said “this people are enjoying the proceeds of their crime while they should be standing trial. If we had this law in place they should have forfeited their assets and we would have taken it back to be it belongs. “Once they know that at the end of the day the properties would be forfeited to the state, they would tell their children to take care of themselves because once they forfeit it their would be nothing left. On what the Commission intended to do with seized cars, she said “government can’t provide you with all you want, so what you need to do is to make use of what you have.” Mr. Polaine while giving highlights on the proposed Bill before the Committee, said “previously we worked as prosecutors and capacity building assistants to fight crime. With the request by t he EFCC and USAIDS and the United Nations, we have been asked to draft a law on civil forfeiture. “The Bill if passed will empower the agencies for fighting crime and make civil applications to High Courts for forfeiture of Assets acquired through criminal means.” Polaine also disclosed that the action would be a civil action and not a criminal one. “It is not a Bill that will reverse the burden of proof. The burden of proof will; remain with the prosecuting authorities That is the EFCC or any commission that would compliment what the Commission’s doing right now. He adviced that an “A new agency should be set up to bring civil forfeiture claims. It is important for a moment to dwell on the terminology realm that is the forfeiture of property. The possessor of the property will not stand the risk of conviction.” We must be sure that the property is from a lawful activity and not a criminal one. The law is not considering conviction based forfeiture but seizure.” Polaine also disclosed that the Courts would decide if the property in question would be forfeited, “But the beauty of the law is that the state and individuals could bring civil cases against the suspects. People must prove how they acquire their wealth. It is very difficult to get criminal devising methods to cover his tracks when we have this law in place.” He also referred to South Africa , Australia , Canada United Kingdom United States and Fiji Island where the Law of civil forfeiture obtained, but said that the challenges however may be in the Constitutionality and right to ownership of property and interference with the human rights of an individual. “The reality is that where there are challenges we would not reject them in their entirety. Another challenge will be in Section 308 of the 1999 Constitution that gives Public Office Holders immunity from prosecution. It seems to us from everything we have heard, that section 308, will apply in the course of our work, as the person in question may say that he is not in a position to stand trial”. Chairman of the Committee Rep. Dave Salako said” the visits and interaction would not have come at a better time than now, why because we have al been told why this bill has come to being. We have to move forward. This Bill I believe all my colleagues will support it. “It won’t help us if we are allowing criminals to continue to enjoy ill-gotten wealth. What the consultants and the EFCC have said and brought to us will no doubt strengthen our fight against crime”. However since the Bill is not coming from the Executive, a member of the House would adopt it as a private member Bill, before it may pass through the National Assembly for Executive signing into law. |
When wind blow, fowl nyash dey open. We have all seen Yar'Adua's nyash now. Yar'Adua has scored serious own goal with this one. He has legitimised corruption in our beloved country with this single action. The whole country will turn against him based on this alone. Does he know that if Ribadu runs for President today, he will win hands down? |
superstan:I never had hope in these boys anyway. Without Mikel and Taiwo, they are average. All these guys like Promise and Nsofor - I just don't see what people see in them. I like Ogbuke. Eromoigbe would have improved our central midfield as well. |
They should probe every state and every government, especially the South-South, but not exclusively. Probing just the South-South will only lead to a short term fix and a false peace. The whole country must be standardised. I read that Goodluck Jonathan drafted a secret plan for Federal Government to scrutinise South-South budgets. I heard the theiving Governors were very unhappy about it. We welcome all forms of transparency in the South-South but that should also not take away from our fight for greater resource-control. |
How we take 16 shot no fit score? SiaSia suppose flog those boys . . . . or are all our shots longe range missiles? This team has too much brutish strength and not enough creativity. |
Well Holland is probably the hardest team in our group so no probs. Although you can never be sure about Japan cos they tend to do well at youth level. USA also have a good generation coming through. Anyway, we will see. |
Akolawole:You sure say no be old age dey worry am? |
we don score? |
Don't mind Promise - old man. What impact is Ogbuke having? I cannot watch the match cos Im at work. I always hated Nsofor. How is he playing? |
dayokanu:The last time I checked, treason can only be proved in a court of law. Most of those killed were on their way to non-violent rallies. Chechnya and Kurdish rebels are engaged in violent struggle, MASSOB are not at present. Therefore, they should be tried in a court of law, not gunned on sight. texazzpete:The issue is regional government, not 50%. We want to give Government their share in taxes, not the other way around. As far as being far fetched, well lets see how far we can push it. We are not joking about this thing o! The fact is that most industrialised countries employ the system of Government we are asking for so Nigeria need to wake up and do things properly. And I believe Nigeria will wake up cos other tribes are starting to wake up. |
dayokanu: dayokanu:At the same time, you have to wonder what the soldiers did to warrant the people of Odi/Zaki killing them. They must have been brutalising the people for many years prior. . . . . . action and reaction. Someone also needs to ask why 2000 members of MASSOB were killed during OBJ's just concluded regime. What was the action and reaction that led to that one? |
doyin13:Yeah. . . . but Bush is not a former military general - and Abu Ghraib was not a wholesale massacre. It was something that happened over a long period of time. doyin13:I find it hard to believe that a superior officer would not contact his superiors (who would contact OBJ) to find out what to do in this situation. There are many allegations against OBJ regarding his conduct in the civil war so it is not out of character to order something like this. He may have ordered a heavy-handed approach (as Abacha did in Ogoni) to see if the Ijaws were really serious about this struggle. If not, then he should have no problems calling an investigation. The same goes for the massacre of the Tiv people in Zaki-biam. (Danjuma ordered this one) I must say that I am happy with the part the media has played in our new democracy. It is time for all levels of Government to adopt this open approach and follow due process of law and transparency. Therefore, if Nigeria is serious about moving forward with democracy, the happenings at Odi and Zaki have to be fully investigated and dealt with. |
doyin13:The soldier on the ground is usually the least culpable party - that is just the code of the military. Anything carried out under orders of a superior absolves you from blame - this defence is usually used in military trials. |
doyin13:Whether or not he did, his failure to call an investigation implicates him. I have a soldier friend who told me he has committed many heinous crimes in the Niger Delta. When I asked him why, he said that soldiers always put aside personal ethics and just follow orders from their superiors. |
@ Ako, Ibi is a well rounded individual with multiple sets of stories, not just 2. ![]() No honestly, I love playing with you guys emotions. I cannot believe that people are practising occultism in 2008. Truth be told, I have always rated Mourinho as a great manager - but not a special one. I rank him with the other great managers. But since I came to Nairaland, I have adopted an anti-Jose stance to provide a counterbalance to the story, since so many people here worship at the cult of Jose Mourinho. I expect better rationale from grown-up individuals. Jose has his flaws just like any other manager. Must you defend his every flaw? Is he a demi-god? First, are his good qualities - the ability to organise the team, ability to inspire his players, ability to put the fear of shege in his players, tactical awareness, good discipline, good physical conditioning of the team, winning mentality, good use of the media, etc. At the same time Jose's flaws are quite easy to see - a lack of flair, a greed culture at Chelsea, not caring for Chelsea's balance sheet, wasting money on dud players, marginalising fringe players, and a fractious personality who blames everything but himself for defeat (Rijkaard, Anders Frisk, Luis Garcia, Boulahrouz, Sheva, Arnesen, Ferreira, Geremi, injuries, red cards, Reading Ambulance service, eggs, omelettes, Waitrose etc). The last time I bought his excuses was when we lost to Liverpool in CL in 2007 after playing horrible football and looking completely bereft of any attacking ideas - and he tried to say the best team lost."You know, omelettes, eggs? If you have no eggs, you have no omelette. And it depends upon the the quality of the eggs. In the supermarket you have Class One, Two and Three eggs. Some are more expensive and make better omelettes. So when Class One eggs are in Waitrose and you cannot go there, you have a problem" ![]() Yeah - SWP, Malouda and Ferreira were class one eggs alright, despite their Waitrose prices. I can also talk about AW and SAF's good and bad points - yet, you will not see any Woman Utd or Arse fan in a hurry to shout me down for pointing out their managers flaws. Is this because a cult of personality has been built around Jose? Why are grown men's minds so malleable? Can mind-control be practiced over the TV airwaves? If so, Jose Mourinho should be Guru Maharaji because he got Ako and a few others hanging on his every word. A Chelsea fan once told me that Jose is a one-trick pony. I corrected him - I said Jose is like a Business Manager you bring in when a company is sick and failing. He comes in with a heavy hand, whips employees into shape, cuts costs, sells off unproductive assets, lays a few people off and generally streamlines the business. He turns the business around into a successful business. Then he moves on - because you cannot motivate people endlessly using the same heavy handed approach. Players get tired of the same thing all the time. There is only so much blood they can sweat. After that, you need real flair players to keep the team winning. Players like Cristiano Ronaldo allow players like Owen Hargreaves to have a rest and take it easy every now and then because not every game is a fight to the end. Unfortunately, this is not Jose's style of play. Hence, I predict that Jose will always be a short term fix and will never last more than 5 years at any club. I say this not only because of his management style but because he has fallen out with his previous employers, from Benfica to Porto to Chelsea to Barcelona. Throw in his spats with Cruyff, Benitez, Scolari, Rijkaard etc and you begin to build a psychological profile of a fractious personality who struggles to maintain long term working relationships. Hence, I believe his cycle at Chelsea was over. I have been at Chelsea long before Jose and I will support Chelsea long after Jose and thank God I have seen many managers so no publicity stunt can fool me. Maybe we suffer from 'hero' syndrome at Chelsea since we have been so starved of success. At InterMilan, Jose is nothing but a new manager. They have won the league three times in a row, therefore they will not trip for anything other than a Champions League win. Jose is a great manager, not an infallible being. Meanwhile, I wonder who Akola will support when we play InterMilan in the Champions League? |
otokx:Which democracy? A one party state? |
I prefer Akintola to Awolowo. Let us tell the truth about Awolowo. http://www.dawodu.com/agbe1.htm Akintola fought for the Yoruba people By Fazil Ope-Agbe FOR quite a long time I have agonized over the wisdom of telling truths which I know a majority of Nigerians do not want to hear. After reading Oluwole Kehinde's article on the subject matter (The Guardian, June 3, 2003) I believe it is time to hear from someone who not only was an eye-witness but an insignificant participant in Chief S. L. Akintola's fight to create a viable, stable and prosperous Nigerian nation. First and foremost, I must put to rest the fallacy that Chief Obafemi Awolowo's fight was against Northern domination. An understanding of the situation at Independence would reveal that the urge to dominate was in the minds of the major tribes of Southern Nigeria, the Ibos and the Yorubas. The clamour for independence started, was nurtured and brought to fruition in the South, comprising the Eastern and Western Regions of Nigeria. In those early years of Nigerian nationalism, the North made it clear that it was not ready for independence, but it was dragged along, screaming and kicking by the relentless tide of Southern Nigeria's political ambition. At that time, all the North wanted was to be left alone within the boundaries where the colonial masters found it. The North had neither interest in nor designs on any territory outside Northern Nigeria. Unable to check the irresistible pull of the south towards self-determination and eventual independence from colonial rule, the North adopted what it believed was the best strategy to ensure that it was not relegated to serfdom in an independent Nigeria. A glance at the map of Nigeria during the colonial era shows that Northern Nigeria had a larger land mass than Eastern and Western Nigeria put together. It was also assumed that the North had a larger population, than the Southern regions combined. At the time of Independence, the attitude of Northern Nigeria, led by Sir Ahmadu Bello was that Nigeria had two components - the North and the South. Consequently the North believed and pursued a policy whereby everything worth sharing was divided into two, half for the North and half for the South. Under the Regional arrangement, every Region was expected to be the architect of its fortune. The North summarized the situation with the quote East for Easterners, West for Westerners, North for Northerners and we all meet at the center. The center referred to was Lagos or in other words, at federal level. Even though the South verbally rejected that notion, events and actions clearly show that the South adopted it in practice. A classic example was the election of 1956 into the Western House of Assembly which was won by the N.C.N.C. as a result of which, Dr. Nnamdi Azikiwe would have become the leader of Government and eventually first Premier of Western Nigeria. The idea of an Ibo man becoming the Premier of Western Nigeria was totally unacceptable to every right thinking Yoruba man; so much so that the Yorubas elected under the platform of the N.C.N.C decamped en-mass and crossed over to the Action group led by Chief Obafemi Awolowo. Some may call it tribalism but I insist that by voting Dr. Azikiwe into the Western House of Assembly at all, the West had demonstrated an act of liberalism that by far surpassed any action that could happen in Eastern or Northern Nigeria. Common sense dictates that you do not hand over the supervision of your house, your wife, your children and your fortune etc to a friend no matter how much you trust that friend. That rejection of Dr. Azikiwe's bid to head the government of Western Nigeria effectively down graded the N.C.N.C from a national to a regional political party. Chief Obafemi Awolowo as Premier of Western Nigeria was the chief beneficiary of that accepted policy to reserve the leadership of each region for its indigenes. So whatever anybody may shout from the roof tops, the denial of the Western Premiership to Dr. Nnamdi Azikiwe was an endorsement of the North's West is for Westerners, East for Easterners, North for Northerners and we meet at the center policy by Chief Awolowo's west. At the time of Independence, the North was in the hands of the Northerners, the West was in the hands of the Westerners and the East was in the hands of Easterners. During the run-up to the 1959 elections, both the N.C.N.C and the Action Group campaigned throughout the country while the N.P.C limited its campaign to the North. The N.C.N.C was however restrained in its campaign in the North while the Action Group particularly Chief Awolowo went at it hammer and tongs leaving no one in doubt of the intention of himself and his party the Action Group to represent the North at federal level. No party won enough seats to unilaterally form the Federal Government, so it was absolutely necessary to form a coalition. The N.C.N.C was mild and diplomatic in its campaign in the North while in contrast, the Action Group campaign, conducted in person by Chief Awolowo was a virulent no-holds-barred affair. The bad blood generated by the Action Group campaign ruled out any thought or idea of it attempting to forge a coalition with the N.P.C at federal level. The N.P.C and the Action Group were in mutual agreement that an alliance or coalition between their two parties was inconceivable. There were just two viable options; one was for the N.P.C and the N.C.N.C to form a coalition government or for the three dominant parties to form a national government. A third option favoured by Chief Awolowo that the N.C.N.C should form a coalition with the Action Group was seen by every discerning Nigerian as a clear recipe for disaster. The idea that the major Southern political parties should form a Federal Government to the exclusion of the North which from the onset had been jittery over the idea of independence was simply ludicrous. Before independence the cement holding the North and South together was the colonial government. To now remove the colonial government and replace it with a Federal Government of Southerners in which the North was excluded as (advocated by Chief Awolowo) would have resulted in the disintegration of Nigeria as a country. [b]Again we must consider the fact that Chief Awolowo contested the election to the Federal House of Representatives against the majority wish of his party, the Action Group. The party wanted him to go to Lagos only if they were in a position to form the Federal Government in which case an elected member would step down and he would go in by way of bye election. Chief Awolowo rejected the advice that as a national leader he should not go to Lagos to rub shoulders with the lieutenants of his fellow national leaders, Sir Ahmadu Bello and Dr. Nnamdi Azikiwe, unless he was going there as head of government. He rejected that sound advice. Also during behind the scenes negotiations to form the Federal Government that would usher in Independence, Sir Abubakar Tafawa Balewa risked the displeasure of Sir Ahmadu Bello by proposing a national government. Chief Awolowo insisted that he could only serve in a government headed either by himself or Dr. Azikiwe. He implied by his stance that the Northerners were inferior and should not be at the helm of affairs even though they won the greatest number of seats in the National Assembly. The problem with Chief Awolowo was that he ignored the fact that our Constitution provided that we practice democracy and not meritocracy. With the foregoing analysis it is easy to see why the Yorubas in federal establishments did not see Chief Awolowo in the same way the Yorubas of the Western Region saw him. While he was being hailed as a great benevolent and provident leader in Western Nigeria, the Yorubas in Lagos and in federal establishments all over the country felt abandoned. [/b] The North, as stated earlier, saw Nigeria as an amalgamation of two component parts, the North and the South. The policy of the N.P.C therefore was to divide everything -federal revenue, ministerial portfolio, appointments into federal institutions etc into two, one half for the North and one half for the South. The N.P.C was there to collect the share for the North while the N.C.N.C was there to collect the share for the South. The Yoruba ministers in the federal cabinet were nominated and held office by the grace of the Ibo-dominated N.C.N.C. Yoruba public servants were perceived by the Ibos and the Hausas as followers of Awolowo to whom they owed no obligations. It follows therefore that no Northerner or lgbo man in the federal civil service could be treated with levity so as not to incur the displeasure of his kinsmen in the federal cabinet; the Yoruba public servant, in contrast was fair game for all and sundry since he had no protector at federal level. It became common practice for Yorubas to be denied appointments, to be denied promotion and to be superceded by officers from other tribes who were less qualified or experienced. When Yoruba civil servants cried out, Chief Awolowo's response was that he would share in their suffering by refusing to collect his remuneration as the Leader of the Opposition in the Federal House. Before Independence, the federal parliament was Chief S. L. Akintola's turf where he performed the duties of Leader of Opposition intelligently and effectively with a joviality that earned him the love, respect and admiration of a wide spectrum of Nigerians cutting across regional, tribal and political boundaries. Chief Awolowo within weeks of his arrival in the Federal House of Representatives created for himself the image of someone with a chip on his shoulder whose mission in the parliament was to do battle with other parties whom he perceived as his irreconcilable enemies. The other parties responded in kind by going out of their way to slap him down, cut him down to size and rub his face in the mud. The fact that the leader of the Yorubas could be so trampled upon gave other tribes the courage to kick the Yorubas around like football. I must give due credit to the Northern leadership in the Federal Parliament who were not happy with the situation. It is a great pity that the present generation of Northerners bear no resemblance to their predecessors like Sir Abubakar Tafawa Balewa, Alhaji Muhammadu Ribadu, Alhaji Inuwa Wada, Zanna Bukar Dipcharimma and Alhaji Musa Yar-Adua. They were fine gentlemen; cultured, humble, humane, very co-operative, unassuming and matured. As Head of Press Section at the federal ministry of information at that time I received such respect, co-operation and consideration for those northern elders, I became swollen headed enough to look on younger Ministers like Maitama Sule and Shehu Shagari as small boys. On the other hand, we had the Southern Ministers Chief K.O. Mbadiwe, Hon. R.A. Njoku, Chief Aja Nwachukwu, Chief Festus Okotie-Eboh, Chief T.O.S. Benson, Chief J.M. Johnson and Chief Olu Akinfosile; all of them with the exception of Hon. Aja Nwachukwu who took great pains to keep you alive to the fact that they were ministers. When Chief Akintola left the federal parliament to become Premier of Western Nigeria he went with a reservoir of goodwill from the constructive, effective, and contagious humour with which he had conducted his opposition. Yoruba public servants in the federal service found him easier to complain to, than the unyielding Chief Obafemi Awolowo. At the behest of the affected Yorubas he took up the matter of their marginalization and victimization with the N.P.C as the senior partner in the federal coalition government. He was told that the Western Nigeria share of the national cake, which should benefit every Yoruba irrespective of where he is, was there for the asking. The Northern view was that the Action Group which was the true representative of the Yorubas, having refused to take its rightful place in the Federal Government, the N.C.N.C had appropriated the Yoruba share. Chief T.O.S. Benson, Chief Olu Akinfosile and Chief J.M. Johnson in charge of the portfolios that rightfully belonged to Western Nigeria were not true and legitimate representatives of the people of that region. It was the contention of Chief Akintola and his group of broad-minded leaders of the Action Group that Western Nigeria's share of the national cake should revert to the true representatives of the region. Chief Awolowo vehemently opposed that idea if it meant that he would have to co-operate with the Northerners. To say that Chief Awolowo refused to take the Yorubas to the mainstream of Nigerian politics on the terms of the North is absolute rubbish. The Igbos were in the mainstream of Nigerian politics; they were not there on the terms of the North, they were there for the benefit of their people. Sir Abubakar Tafawa Balewa was not Prime Minister on the terms of the North; he was Prime Minister because his party's greatest number of members in Parliament and because the N.C.N.C. leadership believed they would rather do business with him that with Chief Awolowo. [b]The problem with Chief Awolowo is that he was obsessed with leadership. He could not function except as a boss and would refuse to serve in any situation that does not confer on him absolute and unquestionable power and leadership. Chief Obafemi Awolowo was appointed leader of the Action Group because his comrades and colleagues perceived that being named leader meant so much to him. I challenge anybody to declare that Chief Awolowo was head and shoulders above the other founding fathers of the Action Group. As a leader of the Action group, Awolowo rather than function as primus inter pares, blew himself up as the sole guardian who alone knew what was good for every Yoruba man, woman and child. The mistake of Chief Akintola and other great Yoruba leaders was that they allowed Chief Awolowo to claim for himself as a person all the great programmes and achievements of the party. For the sake of peace and harmony, they allowed Chief Awolowo to present himself as a forest rather than as a tree in the forest. It is time we woke up to the fact that every achievement, every stride taken by Western Nigeria in the first republic was the handiwork of the Action Group rather than of the man Awolowo. It follows therefore, that every Western Nigerian who had cause to be grateful to Awolowo should equally be grateful to Chief S.L. Akintola and other Yoruba leaders of the Action Group without whose collaboration and input the successes arrogated to Chief Awolowo would not have been possible. Take Chief Ayo Rosiji, for instance. He was recognized within the Action Group as the party's master planner and strategist, so much so that Chief Awolowo personally nicknamed him the professor. [/b] I wish to emphasise that all that was done for and in Western Nigeria, were not Awolowo's personal 'achievements but that of the Action Group as a party. When the Action Group broke up into the Awolowo faction and the Akintola faction, the N.C.N.C. rallied round Akintola and contributed largely not only to Awolowo's downfall, but also to his imprisonment. With Chief Awolowo temporarily incapacitated, the N.C.N.C. believed that Western Nigeria would fall into its lap like an over ripe apple. The N.C.N.C. had the wrong but widely accepted notion that Chief Awolowo was the only power to be reckoned with in the West and with his departure, they (the N.C.N.C.) could just march in and take over. It therefore, came as a great shock to the N.C.N.C. when every notable Yoruba leader rallied to the support of Chief S.L. Akintola. Yoruba political stalwarts like Chief Richard Akinjide, Chief R.Fani-Kayode, Prince Made Lamuye and a host of others saw in Chief Akintola the type of leader the Yorubas needed and decamped from the N.C.N.C. to join him in the NNDP. Even Chief T.O.S. Benson, a national Vice President of the N.C.N.C, after a brief hesitation, also crossed over to accept Chief Akintola's leadership. Akintola's legacy was that he reconciled Yoruba leaders who were considered irreconcilable under Chief Awolowo's leadership. When Chief Akintola's N.N.D.P. took the Yorubas to their rightful place in the federal government, Chief Ayo Rosiji became Federal Minister of Information, Chief Richard Akinjide became Federal Minister of Education, Chief A.M.A. Akinloye was Minister of Industries, other Ministers I cannot quite remember their portfolios were Prince Made Lamuye and Victor Lajide. The N.N.D.P. Ministers mentioned above represented a bridge between the federal government and the core Yoruba elements of Western Nigeria as against the Lagos Yorubas whom Chief T.O.S. Benson and Chief J.M. Johnson catered for. When Chief Richard Akinjide took over the Federal Ministry of Education, he was presented with a list of nominees for award of federal government scholarship. Ninety Eight percent of Southern nominees on that list were Igbos; the Yorubas, the Midwesterners, the Efiks, the Ibibios, the Ijaws, the Kalabaris etc shared the remaining two percent. Chief Akinjide rejected that list and ordered the compilation of a more balanced list. A majority of the Yorubas and other non-Igbo Southerners who benefitted from federal government scholarship awards that year had Chief S.L. Akintola, the N.N.D.P. and Chief Akinjide to thank for their good fortune. During that period of Akintola's N.N.D.P. participation in the federal government, the tenure of Professor Eni Njoku as Vice Chancellor of the University of Lagos expired, Professor Saburi Biobaku was appointed to succeed him. The N.C.N.C. raised a deafening yell of tribalism and financed students to raise hell and mayhem in the course of which Professor Biobaku was stabbed in an assassination attempt. At that time, there was a profusion of eminent scholars and educationists of Southern Nigerian origin. There were two federal government universities in Ibadan and Lagos. Professor Kenneth Dike was Vice Chancellor at Ibadan while Eni Njoku held court in Lagos. An equitable sharing of the national cake would have prevented a situation where these two federal universities were manned by persons of the same tribe, moreso as Professor Saburi Biobaku was as good if not better than the incumbents at Lagos and Ibadan universities. It was not as if Chief Biobaku's appointment would have made Eni-Njoku jobless. Professor Biobaku had been released by the Federal Government to go and head a university in East Africa and Chief Eni Njoku was only being redeployed to take up the East African job so as to give meaning to the principle of federal character which is still in our constitution as I write. It was these acts to give the Yorubas their fair share of federal patronage that made the Ibos block Chief Akinjide's nomination into Alhaji Shehu Shagari's cabinet and he had to be presented a second time before he got the approval of the Senate. After the 1959 elections, when no party won absolute majority, Sir Abubakar Tafawa Balewa wanted a continuation of a national government as was the case before the election. Chief Awolowo would not hear of it. He wanted the Action Group and the N.C.N.C. to team up against the North. He said he was prepared to serve under Dr. Azikiwe but not under any Northerner. Those of us who were not rabid Awoists wondered what transformation had taken place in Dr. Azikiwe's person since he was chased out of the West by this same Awolowo, who now wanted him to lead the whole country. The only explanation that made sense to us was that Awolowo did not believe in a Nigeria that did not have him as Prime Minister. It was clear from the mood of the times that if the East and the West had teamed up to form the federal government, the North would have justifiably opted out of the federation. An alliance between the West and the East against the North would be nothing short of the South replacing the British as colonial masters of the North. It is inconceivable that Chief Awolowo did not see that implication, so the only conclusion that made sense was that Chief Awolowo would rather dissolve the federation than be part of a country in which he is not the leader. His implication in a coup plot for which he was found guilty and jailed did nothing to disprove the contention that all he cared about was his personal ambition to rule the country or part of it. At the time when negotiations were going on to form the government that would usher in independence, Dr. Nnamdi Azikiwe described himself and his party the N.C.N.C. as the beautiful bride being wooed by the other political parties. There would have been no need for anybody to woo or be wooed if Chief Awolowo had not set his mind against a national government. The N.C.N.C. accepted the suit of the N.P.C. and received as dowry the right to consume Western Nigeria's share of the national cake even though it did not represent the people of Western Nigeria in the federal parliament. The N.C.N.C. discovered after Awolowo's political incapacitation that Chief S.L. Akintola was a tougher nut to crack than Chief Awolowo and decided to make the West ungovernable for him. The assassination attempt on Professor Biobaku was in line with the operation wetie" mayhem going on all over Western Nigeria in which human beings were being doused with petrol and set ablaze. Those dastardly acts were being perpetrated by Yorubas, but the perpetrators, their organizers and co-ordinators were being funded by the government of Eastern Nigeria under Dr. Michael Okpara, according to intelligence reports available to the Western Nigerian government. I heard and saw these reports available only to the innermost caucus of the N.N.D.P. I did not belong to that inner caucus, but as Press Secretary to Chief Ayo Rosiji, master planner and Chief strategist first of the Action Group and later of the N.N.D.P., I had access to the Sanctus sanctorum of Chief Akintola's N.N.D.P. and government. Also for the fact that I was only twenty six years old, a civil servant and slightly built I was ignored like a fly on the wall and things were laid bare in my presence just as women would UnCloth in front of a one year old baby boy. Also in those days of N.C.N.C. financed mayhem in the West, Premier's Lodge, Ibadan was like a refugee camp overflowing with men, women and children who had fled their homes, towns and villages for dear life. There was no privacy for anybody including the Premier Chief Akintola himself to grab some fresh air, breathing space and a snatch of private conversation, Chief Akintola and Chief Rosiji would get into the back seat of my two door Saab car and I would drive them around the back streets of Ibadan GRA and sometimes park by deserted roadsides while the two leaders discussed affairs of state which I found quite revealing and educative. One of the issues discussed in my car was a proposal allegedly made by Chief T.O.S. Benson that the N.N.D.P. should organize its own operation wetie in Lagos to hit back at N.C.N.C. interests and personnel in the federal capital. Chief Ayo Rosiji dismissed that course of action saying any disorderly act in Lagos would be counter-productive as it would draw the ire not only of the targeted N.C.N.C. but also of the federal government and every other Nigerian, seeing that Lagos was Nigeria in microcosm. On that occasion, I was not destined to merely eavesdrop; I was drawn into the conversation.Chief Rosiji said that he had made contact with the President of the Ibo Youth League and he would send him to me and together our task would be to destroy that body and use the fragment to carry the fight right back to Chief Michael Okpara in Enugu and the length and breadth of Eastern Nigeria. The prognosis was that if Chief Michael Okpara* s tail was set on fire he would be so busy trying to put out the flames that he would not be able to continue formenting trouble in the West. I was also given a story to surreptitiously leak to the Press. It concerned the attempt to remove Chief Festus Okotie-Eboh as Federal Minister of Finance and replace him with Chief K.O. Mbadiwe. When the Western Nigeria share of the Federal cabinet was allocated to the N.N.D.P., the number of N.C.N.C. Ministers was reduced from eight to five with Chief Okotie-Eboh as the only non-Tho N.C.N.C. Minister in the cabinet. The N.C.N.C. had believed that with its representation in the federal cabinet reduced, to place the important Finance Ministry in an Igbo hand was a desideratum; in other words, Chief Festus Okotie Eboh not being an Igbo man was a second class N.C.N.Cer. The N.C.N.C. requested Sir Abubakar to reshuffle the cabinet so that Chief Okotie-Eboh and Dr Mbadiwe could swap places. An enraged Chief Okotie-Eboh with the solid backing of N.N.D.P. ministers strongly opposed that move. Chief Akintola took it upon himself to go up North and appeal to Sir Ahmadu Bello to prevail on Sir Abubakar to reject the N.C.N.C. request. The refusal of Chief Okotie-Eboh to surrender the Ministry of Finance to Dr K.O. Mbadiwe was a sin so grievious in the opinion of the N.C.N.C. that he was killed alongside Yoruba and Northern leaders in January 1966. When I called in some officers from my ministry to help spread the story of the N.C.N.C. pertkiy on Chief Okotie-Eboh, one of the officers, Stephen Ojo, confirmed to me that Chief K.O. Mbadiwe had already announced to Pressmen that he was soon to replace Chief Okotie-Eboh as Finance Minister. The failure of that move caused Chief K.O. Mbadiwe considerable loss of face and did nothing to alleviate his feeling of contempt for Dr. Michael Okpara whom he had described as the rural Bende bumpkin without the national credentials necessary to lead a great party like the N.C.N.C. Most devastating for the N.C.N.C. was that Chief Okotie-Eboh and Dr. K.O. Mbadiwe, the N.C.N.C. s most prominent ministers in the federal capital, gravitated towards the Sardauna as the one person who could make or mar one's fortune in Nigeria*s political arena. At the same time, a group of young men came to me in my office. Their leader introduced himself as Emeka Chikwendu, President of the Ibo Youth League and those with him as the members of the League's executive committee. They said they had come to pledge their support for Chief Akintola and praised the good work he was doing to restore balance to the tottering foundation of Nigeria*s unity. They acknowledged that the turmoil in Nigeria was caused by the Ibo elders' attempt to deny the other Southern tribes their place in the sun. They expressed disappointment at Chief Awolowo's leadership pattern and drew a contrast between Zik's diplomatic handling of the rebellion of Mbadiwe, Nwapa and company to Awolowo's fight to finish duel with Chief Akintola. They put it all in a Press Release and we took it round to the news houses thus flagging off a campaign of the Ibo Youth League (or purported Ibo Youth League) singing praises of Chief S. L. Akintola and heaping calumny on Dr. Michael Okpara and other Ibo leaders. They even talked of going back home to tell the people in the villages how their leaders were making a nuisance of themselves in Lagos and giving their tribe a bad name. That year 1965 was a year of electrifying political turmoil in the South. Chief T. 0. S. Benson the N.C.N.C.'s mainstay in Lagos had quit the party in high dudgeon over the open support of the Eastern House of Assembly for Boniface Ofokaja's rebellion and open defiance of the minister over the appointment of Mr. Segun Smith as News Editor of the Nigerian Television Authority. Chief Okotie-Eboh was annoyed with the N.C.N.C. for trying to make Dr. K.0. Mbadiwe supplant him as Minister of Finance. Dr. K. 0. Mbadiwe sensing that the Sardauna of Sokoto had the power to make and unmake, gravitated towards him (the Sarduana) as evidenced by the Sarduana's invitation to the East to preside over the inauguration of the Ojike Memorial Foundation. The Action Group felt betrayed that the N.C.N.C. did not concede any seat to its candidates in the East as the Action Group did for the N.C.N.C. in the West under the umbrella of the All Progressive Grand Alliance. The N.P.C. / N.C.N.C. coalition government at the center was being rocked by the census crisis caused by the N.C.N.C.'s claim that the North was not as populous as originally assumed. It was a period of political jostling and juggling that tasked the assiduity of every top politician in the country and the N.C.N.C. was having the worse of it; then the army struck. The pattern of killings left nobody in any doubt that the coup was meant to give the Ibo tribe the supremacy over the rest of Nigeria which their politicians had been unable to achieve in the political arena. It was trumpeted that the army stepped in to remove corrupt politicians but nobody has been able to explain how army officers like Brigadier Ademulegun, Brigadier Maimalari, Colonel Shodeinde, Col. Largema, Col. Pam etc could pass for corrupt politicians. As for the murdered politicians, Sir Ahmadu Bello, Sir Abubakar Tafawa Balewa, Chief S. L. Akintola and Chief F. S. Okotie-Eboh, I present this article as a challenge to anybody to catalogue sins exclusive to them which could not be found in any Ibo politician, none of whom lost a single hair of their head. Any doubt as to the intention of the coup was laid to rest when Ibos trooped out on the streets in the North singing war songs jubilating over the death of the Sarduana and praising their sons who committed the murders; that tactless behaviour led to the massacre of hundreds of them in the streets of Kano and other Northern cities. A few hours after the confirmation of the deaths of the Northern and Western political and military leaders Mr. Cyprian Ekwensi, Director of Information rang and told me Fazil, I'm back; you people don't understand the caliber of people you are dealing with. He had been sent on compulsory leave and directed to resume as Chief Librarian at the Old Secretariat, Marina. As Director of Information, he had always claimed precedence over the Permanent Secretary of the Ministry. With Chief 1. 0. S. Benson an N.C.N.Cer as Minister of Information, Cyprian Ekwensi had been able to throw his weight around to the extent of treating the Permanent Secretary, Mr. F.I. Ajumogobia as his subordinate. When Chief Ayo Rosiji took over as Minister of Information, Mr. Howson-Wright replaced Mr. Ajumogobia as Permanent Secretary. Before long Ekwensi and Howson-Wright were at each other's throat in a battle for supremacy. An issue arose over which Ekwensi as Director of Information requested that I, as Press Secretary to the Minister should complain that Howson-Wright was exceeding his bounds as Permanent Secretary and interfering in publicity matters for which he was not qualified. I spoke to Chief Rosiji and he told me that he was aware of the dog fight between Howson-Wright and Ekwensi and he had absolutely refused to interfere. He said he and Ekwensi were together at the Old Yaba College (now College of Technology) and as alumni of that college, Ekwensi expected him (Rosiji) to take his side against Howson-Wright. Howson-Wright in Rosiji's own words claims to be an Egba man like me and expects me to be on his side, but me I am a politician and I don't want to be embroiled in the fight of civil servants; they should take their palaver to the Public Service Commission and you had better steer clear; they are giants and if you allow yourself to be used by any of them, you*ll only get crushed. I explained to Ekwensi that the Minister did not want to get involved and he had advised me to steer clear. Ekwensi said that as the Minister*s press Secretary I could not stand clear. He said it was my duty to advise the Minister and I should protest officially in writing against Howson-Wright's excesses. I told him I couldn't do that; I was still smarting from wounds inflicted on me when I was sent out to do battle with the then Permanent Secretary of External Affairs, Mr. Nwokedi. I wasn't going to pick fights with any more Permanent Secretaries; with me it was once bitten twice shy. Ekwensi invited me into his office. He had my confidential file in front of him. He told me I was overdue for promotion and he was on the point of alerting the Public Service Commission to that fact, but first of all I should write that petition against Howson-Wright. I refused and he asked me whether I wanted to be promoted or not. I told him I didn*t care and that I refused to be blackmailed for the sake of promotion. Ekwensi got annoyed. He shouted at me that if I thought that he had no power over me just because I was the Minister*s Press Secretary, I should think again. He said he was in a position to hit me hard. I said I didn*t care and walked out of his office. A few weeks later, everybody was stunned to read in the Federal Government Gazette that Moses Ihonde and Azeez Garuba had been appointed Higher Information Officers. Moses Ihonde and Azeez Garuba were young graduates fresh from university. They had applied for appointment as Information Officers and had been given provisional appointments pending their interview by the Public Service Commission. I had been acting as Higher Information Officer for two years and was due for automatic promotion without recourse to the Public Service Commission. Moses Ihonde and Azeez Garuba had appeared before the Public Service Commission to be interviewed for appointment as Information Officers. Afier the interview, Ekwensi had told the Commissioners that there were two vacancies in the Higher Information Officer cadre and that there were no Information Officers in the Ministry good enough to be elevated to that position. He therefore requested the Commission to appoint Ihonde and Garuba to the higher office. That was Ekwensi's revenge for my refusal to write a petition against my Permanent Secretary, Howson-Wright. He got Moses Ihonde and Azeez Garuba appointed Higher Information Officers so as to deny me the chance of promotion to one of those vacancies. Unfortunately for him however, things had changed. Chief T. 0. S. Benson whom he could toy with because Chief Benson held office by the grace of the N.C.N.C. was no longer there. He had been replaced with Chief S. L. Akintola*s Ayo Rosiji who sent a strongly worded protest to the Public Service Commission over the irregularity and injustice surrounding the appointments of Moses Ihonde and Azeez Garuba. The Public Service Commission refused to reverse itself on that matter but was displeased at Ekwensi for misleading and using it as an instrument of personal vendetta, hence the order that he proceed on leave and not return as Director of Information but to go to the Old Secretariat as Librarian. I was robbed of my promotion, but I walked tall in the knowledge that notice had been served that the Yorubaman had arrived and could no longer be kicked around like a football; that was Akintola's legacy. Like other Nigerians, I regarded every Yoruba person as an Awoist and stayed clear of them until Chief S. L. Akintola and his men came to prove that one could be a good Yoruba man without being an Awoist. So what was the Awolowo legacy? Chief Awolowo*s policies resulted in a chain reaction that led to the military overthrow of civilian governance in Nigeria, the civil war and the eventual emergence of a latter day Northerner who was arrogant, domineering and greedy. The Hausa leaders whom the military boys butchered in January 1966 were humble, principled, cultured and very pleasant. It is a great pity that they did not live to impart their noble qualities on those who eventually succeeded them. At Independence, Nigeria was a tripod comprising the Hausas, the Igbos and the Yorubas. Chief Awolowo's refusal to allow the Yorubas take their rightful place at the center because he was not made Prime Minister amounted to knocking off one leg of the tripod. Nature never tolerates a vacuum so the N C N C rushed in to fill the gap created by the Action Group's absence in the central government. Good fences, they say, make good neighbours. if you don't fence your property your neighbour could encroach on it and it would take a fight to drive him off When Chief Awolowo refused to lead the Yorubas to their rightful place at the centre, the N.C.N.C. moved in to fill the void that he created. When Chief Akintola went in to reclaim what rightfully belonged to his people, it created bad blood which could not have arisen if Chief Awolowo had not created a vacuum that sucked in the trespassers. One legacy of Chief Awolowo that I can attest to, is the like of a man who sacrificed and lost everything because of his steadfast support for Chief Awolowo. My assignment with Chief Ayo Rosiji brought me in contact with the different players in the politics of Yoruba land among whom was Alhaji S.D. Adegbenro, whom Chief Awolowo chose to replace Chief Akintola as Premier of Western Nigeria. Alhaji Adegbenro put up a good fight but was overwhelmed by a much stronger and superior opponent. After the civil war, I was passing through Abeokuta and I decided to drop in on the Alhaji and exchange views on the eventual outcome of things. I received the greatest shock of my life; I can not find adequate words to describe the squalor in which I found Chief Adegbenro, at a time when Chief Awolowo whom he fought and sacrificed so much for, was Federal Minister of Finance and Deputy Head of the Federal Military Government. In conclusion, I aver that the current situation in which a Yoruba man, has become Head of State with the full backing of his Yoruba kith and kin, is a defeat for Awoism. Awoism is a belief that only Chief Awolowo or his designated and acknowledged apostle can lead the Yorubas into a position of prominence and I challenge anybody to tell me that President Obasanjo was, is or could ever be an Awoist. |
tpia:I am always willing to be enlightened. . . . .please post the true history then, lemme read it and judge. |
Calling all UK guys - what channel is showing the matches. Eurosport? |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 1679 1680 1681 1682 1683 1684 1685 1686 1687 (of 1717 pages)
. Why did Massimo Moratti waste the talents of Mutu, Andrea Pirlo and Seedorf who went on to greater things at other clubs? Why did he sell half of Adriano to Parma when everybody could see that Adriano was a future star? Which club president described the Ajax team of 1997 as 'similar to playing the Congo' because Ajax had too many black players? (Jesus Gill, Atletico Madrid). Who did Bobby Robson want to sign for Barca instead of Ronaldo? What do you think of the De La Pena/Ronaldo partnership of 1996/1997? etc. Let us talk big boy talk, not small boy talk. Someone on here was telling me that Ikpeba had a higher profile than Sonny Anderson and Henry in 1998/1999 - and you supported him. . . . it is things like this that seperate the men from the boys when it comes to football.
did u mean his team or himself ? because Mourinho is all flair himself !!! Chelsea lacked flair and definitely devoid of class
We are not joking about this thing o! The fact is that most industrialised countries employ the system of Government we are asking for so Nigeria need to wake up and do things properly. And I believe Nigeria will wake up cos other tribes are starting to wake up.