raumdeuter: Probably its because the left have become more aggresive in pushing the agenda, How many of Hollywood do you see in the past as trans, How many trans movie did you notice before, How many people in the govt did you see as trans, How many people in the sport world do you see identify as trans
The left has made it cool to be
I dont have a problem with whatever you choose to do with yourself as an adult its only when it interferes with society that it becomes an issue. I dont have an issue with a 15yr old boy who claims he is a girl until he decides to compete with my daughter or use my daughters bathroom, I wont have an issue with you walking naked inside your home until you decide to do it in a shared space where everyone including minors all dwell
I asked you how many trans you saw this year in the flesh.
I don't ask about film you didn't watch that your social media feeds highlighted to you. In previous years, it would be no different from watching Ru Paul or Eddie Izzard if it wasn't so politically contentious
How many trans did you see in the flesh in 2023 so far?
raumdeuter: This is not just scare mongering, Its everywhere. Its in the childrens school in their books, In every adult sphere in the West The Liam Thomas that contested with female to win swimming is not imaginary, it actually happened. Biological males are actively competing in female sports
In Hollywood, the movies show it all the time, even superhero like Superman/Spiderman are getting their trans alternatives, even emojis are now with pregnant men If you are not seeing them, maybe you havent been going out enough
You see what they choose to highlight to you on social media. Even a group of Satanists who might be 0.5 percent of population might become visible to you if a political party decide to bootstrap their visibility
How many trans have you seen this year?
And make no mistake, I am watching what they teach my children in school. I have lived under Conservative Govt for the last 14 years with 14 years of Education ministers. Na so the world dey go.
nihilistjnr: I'm not opposed to gay or trans. What I find silly is the movement to seek political legitimacy for some of these identities.
If a man is running around in female clothes, that's his business. If the man running around d in female clothes insists on the legal right to identify rather than just present as a woman - then that's another kettle of fish altogether, as the same legal principles that guarantee such a right should also guarantee the rights of a nigga that identifies as the left leg of a pair of Dunlop slippers.
And it's those principles that I find absurd
Check this UK population census from 2021 and tell me what merits the attention except Political agenda
Some niggas never seen a trans in their life and will make ten posts a day about the matter
The ones shouting the most just do it to steal vote from emotionally unstable people and will never codify it into law when they are in power
We all know that the equality act that protects me and you as black men is the same equality act that will allow the trans community identify as whatever they want, and no party will do anything about it. But to make plenty noise about it for political posturing against an insignificant percentage of the population, that one is sure.
nihilistjnr: Brah liberalism is the political ideology that legitimises the trans movement in our part of the world .
There are Conservative liberals and liberal conservatives, there is no political leaning to such things, until American hate preachers decided to draw political boundaries around it.
All people have prejudice. Most black and Muslim people vote Labour and hate trans. The most liberal person in the UK, JK Rowling is a so-called transphobe. I vote Conservative and couldn't give a fück less about all these shits. But fúck with my money and you'll see my conservative side.
When you see political parties drawing party lines on such mundane matters, know say water done pass garri. I can walk the street 365 days and not see one trans, so what is the political brouhaha about except the usual conservative playbook of finding a hated group to play on people's emotions and win votes. With all these media noise, I'm expecting to walk down my street and see one trans before I turn the corner but I can't say the last time I saw trans.
30 years ago, the group was blacks, 20 years ago, it was Muslims, then it was gays. None of that is cool no more. Gay is no longer liberal but an accepted Conservative subgroup, now it's trans. Tomorrow it will be aliens.
nihilistjnr: There are people who are literally identifying as disabled, willfully cutting off their limbs or blinding themselves because they identify as Babiala.
This has nothing to do with politics. People have always been weird.
In the late 1990s, we used to watch this on Eurotrash, with other Vaseline segments (shout out to Lolo Ferrari), without anyone giving it political colouration.
Roland17: E no go be first time wen people dey come here come steal posts and repost on SM. Few are respectful and ask for permission but most no even care, dem go renovate am or even copy and paste sef.
As long as the word is out there, I am satisfied. Also, I no dey WhatsApp or SM sef, except you count NL as SM.
So na you write that thing true true? I was even playing sef
That thing made it to my village compound family group
popizaino: I didn't celebrate but i was relieved knowing man united won't win the UCL for the second time in a row.,The loss in Moscow still hurts till date.
We would have beat them in 2009. Our undoing in 2008 was lack of rightback, Essien had to play there cos Ferreira had lost it, and Essien did not cope well there. Essien back in midfield with Iva right back, plus they had Hargreaves injured who was a big part of their 2008 draw/win on penalties
pkasso: Rodri is playing and winning the ball higher up the pitch than Fernandinho used to so it's normal if he gets caught out and can't get back in time. It's all part of the job. But how many times has that happened for you to recognise it as a key weakness in his game?Pep understands that while Rodri and Fernandinho have similar profiles, they are different players. Fernandinho is the better disruptor, Rodri is better at ball progression. So, Rodri's interpretation of the no. 6 role is not what you would expect from Fernandinho, even though the basics are the same. You can't treat the difference in defensive numbers which isn't sizeable by the way, in isolation without considering other variables such as personnel in Defense which has changed from time to time, etc. That is another thing entirely. The easiest way would be to just judge by league ranking, which by the look of things, not much has changed. The deviation is perfectly normal. City are still a Top 2 Defense team for the most part in terms of goals conceded, clean sheets, shots conceded, XGconceded etc.
There are many situations where counterattack occurs and Fernandinho gets back in his box while Rodri will be 30 yards away. That's just the difference between them and it reflects in the goal conceded column
Fernandinho was also top amongst passers, not to the extent of Rodri but you would sacrifice 5 extra passes a game for 5 extra recovery runs
FirstbornWds: You are trying to hard. Your quest for physicality over intelligence is soooo overly flawed. If not, there's no way you'd justify midfield mastery with forwards. Xabi Alonso was just a piece in the Spain's midfield puzzle.. Even the dumbest of portables know who ran the games easy.
Go and check World Cup passing stats between Alonso and Busquet and come back
I have no bias between physicality and technique. I demand both, that's why I equally campaigned against Bakayoko and Ramires here. I'm not responsible for your perception.
A good DM maintains consistency, not jumping from winning when world class stars are around to getting flogged 8-0, 7-1,4-0 regularly. MSN is responsible for 2015, and when MSN was broken up, that same midfield 3 was shitted on repeatedly without fail. But you don't need to convince me, convince your fellow Barka fans who have been complaining nonstop. Arirmark can help you with their numerous complaints. Busquet is what he is, a technically gifted and defensively weak DM
pkasso: I was actually handing Ibime a lifeline on Rodri and the Robust DM issue but Baba no wan gree Rodri is actually a Robust DM, if we are being honest here. He has the right mix of physicality and aggression. The man is a tank at 6'2, strong in duels and regularly uses his size in shielding and retaining the ball. Na my own be that. I wonder if Ibime can offer some clarification on what the qualities of a Robust DM are, so we can identify and differentiate them from the weakling DMs
He is robust except recovery pace. Everything else is agenda from people looking for banter. My only problem with him is his ability to get back in time, which is an important aspect of DM work, which Pep has made allowances for.
My point is very clear - Rodri inability to track back in time will not achieve the same consistency as a Fernandinho and that is evident in all the defensive numbers comparatively. Everything else is banter from clowns who want to turn every discussion into trolling.
Ibime: And don't compare your useless Jogginghoe to Rodri. Rodri would never hide from the ball, he can ride players off his back regularly and controls the ball in order not to be exposed on counterattack, and he has body strength to claim the ball in duels, long legs and height that limit his weakness only to foot races which Kyle Walker is kept back as a safeguard against. Your Jogginghoe does none of that, except when he is playing against Crotone. He is weak on foot races, weak on using his body to claim the ball, weak on jumping to win the ball, weak on riding players on his back, weak on absolutely everything but belleface back-to-sender football which means more pressure and more ways to hurt our midfield, not just foot races
Exonerate1: Pep is really a genius then if he's doing all these things with this so called average players
He is a genius, but you will be a fool to call for the same players to play for Chelsea without Pep overseeing things. That's the naivety of leprous fingers
swiz123: You are the real snake who wants Jorginho to make mistakes so you can say "I told you so". A real enemy of the club who wants us to hire a manager and use players that continually weaken our club just to be right.
You are an egoistical snake whose love for being right overwhelmingly transcends your love for the club. A Lampard supporter has no business with everything you just typed.
You are the confused and naive one who believe Chelsea can be a poor mans Pep, not having enough football sense to know that cheap replication will only drag Chelsea down. That's why all your favourites that you rubber-stamped like Felix, Havertz, Jorginho and co are taking Chelsea into the gutters from the competitive team we used to be in the 2000s when we towed our own path. Las las, your silly ideas of copying Pep without having Pep as manager will turn us into the Arsenal or Villarreal that we used to dominate.
I do not owe allegiance to any team or anyone except Chelsea. I'm not a reptile who sit down to watch every Barcelona game every week for 14 years. You are a clown who chase hype, probably chased hype after Roman bought Chelsea, then when you saw a new shiny thing in 2009, you jumped to them, behaving like a ten year old prevaricating between teams. You even took it further to jump to Man City in the same league. You should just go and join them full time and stop this disgraceful asewo behaviour.
swiz123: Are you a Barcelona fan? Do you watch Busquet religiously every week starting from 2009?
If it look like an opp, talk like an opp, chill with the opp, then it must be
lordfalcao: where was the imaginary second DMs when they were not making finals with fernadinho, or was fernadinho not robust again, to chase back that mancity were getting dumped ?
Last season when they used your fernadinho, as imaginary DM you like to lie about, he failed and viniscus used him to count point
Mumu, Fernandinho at 37 years old was used as Rightback against Vinicius, not DM
Clear road, let others who know what they are talking about discuss
lordfalcao: If you claim pep system doesn't require special DM, you don't have any business crediting man city's 99 points to fernadinho
You don't need 99 points to win. Any DM can win with Pep, but Fernandinho showed how much more efficient it could be if the DM can also close out those counterattacks where Pep loses points on the odd occasion
lordfalcao: so there was no full back to help fernadinho to reach to this level before?
Fernandinho went beyond this level to 98 and 99 point seasons with 23 goals conceded only, and he didn't need Stones doing his chasing back. Notify me when Rodri reaches that level of consistency. As of today, Man City have conceded 31 goals with 2 games left and will not touch 95 points even with Stones helping.
lordfalcao: when the robust fernadinho was there why was pep not making semi finals
I only pointed out situations Fernandinho will prevent that Rodri won't. That has been proven in their goals conceded record and their points record. I challenged you to show where I said City would stop winning because of Rodri, and you can't. So as far as I'm concerned you are conversing with yourself. Even as of now, it's change of formation and another DM in Stones to do the chasing back that Rodri can't do that's in play, so your argument is invalidated.
TLona1: Pep also coached Busquests in Spain when Busquests won the World Cup and Euros plus contributions immensely and doing exploits.
I dare Southgate to use Stones as a DM in the forthcoming Euros and let's see how that's gonna turn out.
You are making the same point
Some people have an unrealistic fantasy of what Pep can achieve with DM with obvious weaknesses and want to import those weaknesses to Chelsea "because Pep does it".
swiz123: You have no point here. Did my likeness for City stop me from supporting our team to beat them in the UCL final? Heck! I even supported Arsenal to win the league because of Jorginho. My love for Barca and City were mostly due to Pep amongst other reasons.
Lastly, you are a clown for thinking Chelsea is City's rival; we are miles apart, not because they are a bigger club, but because of that man Pep Guardiola.
What is a Chelsea fan doing with likeness for City
You are not a Chelsea fan. I don't know what dragged you to claim Chelsea. You are a Barca fan.
Nothing concern real fans with snake like behaviour. You are probably one of those that were celebrating as Ovebro robbed Chelsea in 2009
swiz123: Are you a Barcelona fan? Do you watch Busquet religiously every week starting from 2009?
pkasso: But Ibime, you suppose at least contest your Robust DM L small nau or abi Rodri no dey robust enough ni?
But you deserve one small konk for dissing the man sha. No Rodri slander will be tolerated henceforth.
Only clowns will use Pep DM as evidence of non robust DM working. Pep is not Chelsea manager. Is that not how they hailed Busquets as greatest DM till Pep left him and he turned to expressway?
Just because Pep use John Stones as DM, does not mean a Chelsea fan should be stüpid enough to suggest using John Stones as DM for Chelsea
Pep has many methods of taking traditional DM duties away from DM like using fullbacks like Cancelo as auxiliary midfielders or using this current formation with 3 centrebacks and Stones to support. All parts of his team are focussed on ball recovery and barely exposes his DM to situations that other DMs deal with frequently. Even the one weakness Rodri has which is recovery pace has been well covered by the 3 CBs and Stones behind him, with Walker as failsafe when Rodri fails to make it back
The.minute you are foolish enough to bring non robust DM to Chelsea "because Pep does it", you will know that Pep is not Chelsea manager after one or two floggings. Then you will wonder why your team is frail like Arsenal of late 2000s.
swiz123: Just like you supported Conte nearly bankrupting Inter Milan with his over 30 man stupid signings only to win a fluke league.
Inter got rid of your fraud and they are in the UCL final.
If Conte bankrupted Inter, how are they still thriving.
Inter made cool profits from Contes two big signings (Lukaku and Hakimi) and will make cool cash from Lautaro. Rest.
Conte won league. Inter having easy draws against Porto, Benfica and Milan to get to UCL final no mean, what is their league performance since Conte left
lordfalcao: and ampadu, bisomma nko? The players you claimed will improve the squad tremendously. How are they doing in their respective clubs
It doesn't change the fact that you are a 2 for 5 naira coach and will relegate us..
Is that not how you were foolishly asking how Colwill is doing in his new club at start of season?
Rest you won't rest. Ampadu was suggested as squad depth.
Alex Ferguson is not stupid to be using Darren Fletcher, Neville brothers, John O Shea, Johnny Evans, Wes Brown, Rafinha and Fabio, Ji Sung Park to make up 50% of his squad. The only position you spend big on is forwards and maybe an exceptional CM or CB. Mumu like you think it's by buying Cucurella for £65m, as if he will be a game changer. Every other position provides little marginal advantage.
The Aaron Hickey I suggested as alternative to Cuku is already being chased by Man City. Aaron Hickey was £15m while Perisic was free
Someone like you will bankrupt this club if given one transfer window