larride: HR practically told us we should just manage and bear with them that it was the expansion and its infrastructural needs that's causing the salary delay. I havent heard tha kind of excuse before.
It's possible that those expansion efforts have led to cash flow problems. It happens, however it is incumbent on the company to collect a loan to satisfy it's working capital requirements, of which salary payments should have the utmost priority. In Nigeria, it seems wages are the first to go when any company or entity is having cash flow problems, which speaks to weak employment choice, poor labour laws and impunity.
BlueMann: I now understand the deal better; €70m fixed plus €30m add-ons. The €70m will be paid for the duration of Mudryk's contact (7 and half years), meaning we'll essentially be paying €10m every year. Pretty smart.
We won't be paying $10m every year
$10m is just the period accounting expense being amortised to the books
Shakhtar will get their €70m either upfront or in a couple of installments
afrodoc2: He looks to be more of a transition AM. He is best suited for a mid-table team not a big team that is meant to dominate possession and unlock defences.
Like Gerrard and Muller
Possession domination comes from deep not from AM
Chelsea has always been a transition team in our great years.
donstan18: Corner kick that gave Lampard, Drogba, Mikel, Luiz and lots of Chelsea legends bragging right till date.
Lowkey; you rate Mata and know he’s quality. Your love for lampard won’t allow you admit Mata bodied him when he joined.
Mata didn't body nothing. I always hated Mata, he was a tactical liability that had Chelsea midfield overrun in any mid to big game. I advocated vociferously for his selling, while Chelsea fans thought we were giving Manure a steal, I argued he would weaken them massively, and I was right as fúck. You can ask Nihilistjnr and Nateevs how we argued it in those days.
Two players whose stats will never impress me are Mata and Ozil, their stats come at great expense that render their teams completely uncompetitive in midfield. That's why Mata was hauled off for Kalou often in our UCL run.
This was Mata contribution from our comeback win against Napoli till the end, only floating one corner and causing massive overload on his wing
Kantebets: apart from james there is no other academy player that is good enough for the first 11
Unless the guy is not English then he might come good I am tired of yeye English players
Bloody Humphreys was head and shoulders above CSO in the Man City match. Colwill will shït on CSO head. Whatever you say about academy players, a lot of the current first team players are not better
Mehn yesterday, I was robbed in upper iweka at a gunpoint. The funny shit about this, it happened in the afternoon, upon all my shouting nobody showed concerned. They took my phone and car parts I bought in mgbuka obosi.
I thank God Sha for life.
Not wise to shout in a public place if someone pull gun on you. You could panic the gunman
You hardly fail to use this point to control damage. Even in that 4-4-2, he was free, very very free. We’ve seen stats that confirmed that Mount produced better G/A at 23, and should I talk about UCL win?
I rate Lampard, but anyone trying to discredit Mount just to hype Lampard that couldn’t hit what Mount hit both in National and club level is inviting Lampard dragging and I’ll gladly do that.
Me no dey for nostalgia bias stuff. Lampard that got dusted and retired by a fragile escort like Mata?
A Mata that made Chelsea midfield weak. Ozil-lite
Tell me you no know ball without telling me you no know ball. Lampard was 34 at that time. While Mata was taking Chelsea toward Europa League with his useless statpadding GA, Lampard had to return from injury to shoot Chelsea into TOP 4 by scoring in a run of games from double pivot to save Chelsea season. Below is how 34 year old Lampard came back from injury to save Chelsea season from the double pivot while 12 year old femboy Mata was statpadding in Europa league against Belarusian farmers like Torres. Receive sense.
Everybody wey dey cuss Gallagher go swallow their words before the next 5 years, especially if he leaves Chelsea. They absolutely do not know the profile of the player, expecting a Modric from a Steven Gerrard. Is it beans for a player to be in England squad 2 years into his premier league debut. Keep hating Gallagher based on few minutes as a wingback, winger or midfield pivot, e go shock una.
Gallagher is a no-brainer for any manager that wants to play a midfield 3. Get a DM and a controller, and let Gallagher do his work making runs to join the striker. That boy is golden
Nateevs2: You mean we should leave James alone? Or you forget say James came from the academy, went out on loan and accidentally played for the first team?
Meanwhile, Ian Maatsen is not English. I have been calling for Ian to join the team for about 3 years now.
The way Ballzproblem2 is calling Ian Maatsen, you will think he is a new face
The only thing preventing Maatsen from making a claim is his lack of height.
donstan18: I don’t want to drag Lampard, but based on stats and Achievements at Mount’s age, Lampard was a nobody.
If you hate Lampard, make we toll this route.
A40 once said this about Dele Alli, we know how that ended
Lampard always had a superb shot and first time assist vision from his debut that Mount may never have. The difference is he played CM in a 4-4-2 at West Ham. Back then 4-4-2 midfielders hardly go into the box
poshemmanuel: I think signing a quality DM and a Bruno fernedez or de bruyne kind of midfielders Will be address in the summer surely
By then these new signings may already be in a negative spiral and written off like Sterling
A good midfield brings the best out of even average players, while great attacking players without a midfield decline in value and confidence. Real Madrid Galacticos era after the exit of Makelele is the perfect example