₦airaland Forum

daintyprincess:
I think majority of us are even bothered about the rape issue, looking at that list the lawyer posted, we can see some other charges, who committed those one. Cause I can see terroristic something and false imprisonment, how about those ones.

Those are all part of the same incident

A man who stops a girl and doesn't let her go her way is false imprisonment, while threatening her to comply is terroristic threat

Powerhouse5050:
9-12 months

Hopefully this will be resolved in that time

benalvino3:
ibime, the 26 studies the BBC talk about... could you present it? follow their source lets see if you will land on the so-called studies.

I don't have time. You highlight the key points for us and show us where they are wrong.

After that, write to BBC or IPSO

https://www.ipso.co.uk/

basilico:
The work of today's media is to lie. BBC lies .
Example

The British Broadcasting Corporation has been caught out once again blatantly lying with image manipulation over recent events in Iran, claiming that a crowd which had rallied in support of the controversial incumbent president was in fact rallying in support of his opponent.

The blatant deception has become typical not only for the BBC but for many media outlets in Britain, and has brought shame upon the journalistic profession for those few professionals who are trying to do a decent job.

The BBC’s latest deception has been exposed on the whatreallyhappened.com website, which shows how a photograph of a pro-Ahmadinejad rally which appeared on the Los Angeles Times website was deliberately manipulated and cropped by the BBC and presented as a rally in support of his opponent Mousavi.

Another
No surprise that the BBC has been caught out in a lie.
THE BBC has had to apologise after being caught out telling porkie pies in one of its Panorama documentaries.

Though it claimed to show genuine footage of exploited Indian child labourers sweating for a pittance to make cheap fashion for Primark, these scenes had in fact been staged.

It is better you follow the lies of your alternative news sources. As for me and all sane people, we will continue to watch the BBC despite one or two deviations you may want to point out to bring sane media channels down to the level of the lies networks you consume.

It is good they apologised in the example you quoted. All sane media post retractions except the QAnon variety who continue their lies even in the face of evidence.

If you have issues with anything at the BBC, contact the Independent Press Standards Organisation. This something we have in UK which they don't have in Yankee, that allows your QAnon networks to tell you anything they like.

https://www.ipso.co.uk/

Powerhouse5050:
The first 3 attornies were white male but the current attorney is black female

I believe she will do a better job and a Judge will be more careful about bullying her into overlooking these evidence.

How long is the appeals process?

benalvino3:
1: speak for yourself and you did not even look at it but you are claiming its Qanon and other gibs
2: there is no fight with Ivermectin. in India they are not fighting and it is helping them.
3: whatever they are or you claim they are, they have no business lying to people.
4: because they don't attack those drugs does not mean ivermectin is not helpful or work. they are lying and spreading lies about a drug.

All of this is according to you. The BBC report quoted Doctors that studied the clinical trials and you say they are lying, but didn't tell us where they are lying. We don't have time. You can help yourself by proving where the lies are. If you prove it and write to BBC, they will even retract it.

chatinent:
Every charge there is from the rape incidence, during the whole act. The law calculated every legal damage/injury that occurred during the act.

Those charges didn't mean Mr. Bar had previous crimes, no. Those are legal injuries during the act of rape, by the rapist who raped the victim....even though it was graven when the Court felt that Mr. Bar wasn't remorseful. But can sb be remorseful for what they didn't do?


For example, by raping sb, you are liable for false imprisonment. You restricted the freedom of that person with nowhere to escape...and that's unlawful.

More so, the victim is a minor.

Did he have a black lawyer? I don't see how a black lawyer would have fumbled all these evidence or let the Judge bully him into making them inadmissible.

daintyprincess:
He said he's appealing so he has a room already, I think. And please when at the appeal court, these documents you are talking about here should be tendered. Don't let what happened before repeat itself, please.

Cause it's a different thing to drop evidences here for us and you don't present it at court. We won't be the one to judge the case

We can use social media and as someone suggested human rights radio.

Since you are sure he may be innocent, let's push for a path to be followed

The remaining docs are yet to be dropped

Ibime, I saw your comments at a point, what do you think about the whole situation with the few documents at our disposal

The guy looks innocent to me. Legal professionals in the USA should throw hands into the matter. Wheels of justice and appeals processes grind slowly in USA. Na for advocates to make noise and to appeal to celebrities on both sides of the Atlantic to push the matter.

benalvino3:
the fact of the matter is this: the BBC lied, they are spreading lies about IVM. the work of the media is about publishing news not lying to sway peoples mind. You are brainwash oga. seriously brainwashed. Digest any kind of lie you see from the media. At least i have found out that the source and Studies they claim in that article does not exists. their main source is from a bunch of students discussing on twitter.

Nobody has time to follow your links or what you claim to have disproved. Ivermectins fight is not with the BBC but in convincing the Health Agencies. Like I said, the BBC and all UK media are agents of Public Health England as concerning public health matters. There are many drugs being used as therapeutic, most widely used of which is Dexamethasone and Regeneron. Nobody is attacking these drugs. They are what they are, a therapeutic but not a fullproof just like Ivermectin. None of these drugs position themselves as an anti-vaccine drug.

BBC job is to help PHE increase vaccination uptake and combat anti-vaccine rhetoric of which the Ivermectin crowd are the main proponents, so one should not be surprised to see Ivermectin come under such scrutiny. When you consume news, do so like a matured man, not an infantile, easily outraged like most Trumpanzees are.

As to whether you claim they quoted debunked sources, I don't care cos I don't have time and it is immaterial. Ivermectin hasn't done its job of convincing either it's manufacturer or Health Agencies and that's the koko.

benalvino3:
hahaha So i complained that things are expensive in London is bad? oya quote me for reference na so people can see context.
It is bad that i choose to come home where i can do something better than i was in the UK with job security? lol ok.
at least i can get into the UK and out when i like. I am not one of those people who are hiding from immigration and cannot come home because they know they cant go back. Living in the UK is not necessary for me unlike you. I have a better life here I WOKE UP HAPPY TODAY AND YOU DID NOT

Like I said, I tell it how it is, and you tell it how it might be. Anything you are talking about hiding from immigration and doing security work is might be. But what it is is already evident.

It is true that London is expensive but not to the extent of complaining of £500 rent and moving to another country within the UK in order to pay less rent. If you met job requirements for VISA at £35k during your time, you will not leave London even for £1k rent, and if you moved to Wales, you will equally look for mortgage or rent within that range as befitting your standard of living and earning power. That is by the by though. You can quote yourself for what you said and explain your context, I don't have time.

Finally, back to the matter. . . . it is not Ivermectins proponents job to convince or argue with the BBC. It is their job to convince the Health Agencies with their clinical trials.

So far as Ivermectin hasn't convinced UK health agencies, BBC is on the right side of the debate as they are publicly funded and must send out the Government line on Healthcare. Healthcare is a science, not a political debate and no Health Agency will deny Ivermectin if the clinical trial stacks up. BBC will also not tout anything not approved by the Health agencies. That is responsible journalism. It doesn't mean there may not be benefits from Ivermectin, however you should know that Healthcare is not a talk-anyhow, do-anyhow field and there are potential libel complications from pushing out something that has not been signed off by Health Agencies.

Like someone said, Ivermectin is yet to convince Merck, the maker of Ivermectin who are still trying to produce an alternative therapy. As for me, I don't mind having Ivermectin if someone says it can help but I don't expect authorities or responsible journalists to tout it without sign off from Health Agencies, and certainly not as an alternative to vaccines.

benalvino3:
oya quote the above for everyone to see the context so they can know the liar you are. you better hit the Gym oh. those night clubs and pubs like it when their bouncers pump up.
Oga cry.
I posted an article from BBC you are still talking about QAnon. BBC is QAnon?

What context do you need to know about someone struggling with £500 house rent in London and running to Wales where they can pay maybe £250?

Maybe if you followed BBC instead of your American QAnon news sources, you would have integrated better into British society and allowed you to get the job that would give you the visa you need to stay. It doesn't bother me, like I said, the UK is better off with one less QAnon. I just don't know what will make someone in the UK clown BBC and gobble up alternative facts sources from the American right wing. If you curse the land, the land will curse you, and it did, sending you back to the City of soot where your QAnon ideology can be expressed freely.

Facts don't lie, and your Visa status and house rent complaints should tell the whole story of what kind of work you were able to secure in UK. Anything else is for the birds. In the words of P Diddy, I tell it how it is, and you tell it how it might be.

benalvino3:
we know your type. them full Next or zara they do security job, at night they are bouncers

you woke up with frustration i understand.

companies rejected me which is true but they also accepted me. that is the nature of job searching. as for you they never reject you, you can always secure a job as a bouncer or a security at Next or Zara. go sleep. like someone said, you have started seeing post from your slave master and you want to impress him houseboy

Which company accepted you? The only one you could get is the one that had you complaining about struggling to pay £500 house rent which must be the security job you are talking about. At the end of the day, you were bounced back to the land of soot having failed to land one that meets visa requirements. I say the UK is better for it. We don't need lunatics of QAnon type here.

benalvino3:
Ibime see your people, they are debunking ivermectin.

with studies that does not exist. they are quoting unpublished evidence. they main source are a bunch of twitter students from twitter

they are conveniently posting retracted studies about IVM. this is how they lie to you.

https://www.bbc.com/news/health-58170809

Stop mentioning me anyhow, cultist

Let me guess, you were watching American Eagle or Qanon TV when you were in the Welsh Hills, bloody brainwashed coon. Trump told you to watch his propaganda channels so you do.

Thank God UK companies rejected you, we don't need mentally unfit people in this country.

When a health ministry signs off on Ivermectin clinical trial, we will know. Until then, I am not going back and forth with you on what study said what and what was debunked. Clinical Trial doesn't lie,.and I believe our Health agencies have our best interest at heart.

Wilder tried to let Loaded Lux lead him out sha.

Emaprince can you see this?



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ar_qqRShHHU

jonsnow92:
If Fury catch Usyk, ajeku iya.
The biggest opponent to Fury is Fury himself.
A focused Fury has no match.
At all.

Still the only undefeated guy over a long period in the division, only guy to hold all belts and only guy to take 3 years off to sniff cocaine, come back and whoop them all.

Joshua noisemakers should give it up for the Heavyweight King.

Most fluid boxer in the Heavyweight division and chin made of granite.

jedisco:
How do you pay mama eliza her portion

The only thing I have returned to my bank so far is my initial capital and I returned in batches under £10k per time so the bank won't trigger an investigation. Nobody done hook me so far and from what the bank can see, I have not returned profit. If I blow to the point I can't get away with it by dripping it back slowly, I will just put 20% aside for Capital Gains tax. There is a grey area that says if you traded, it won't be treated as gains on Capital but as Income, and your profits will be added to your salary for the year and taxed at Income Tax rate which is more than double the CGT rate. Not sure their definition of trading for now.

Response01:
Boss, is it easy for Nigerians to use coin base and how do you move your funds when you want to sell that wont attract high charges?

I only use Coinbase now for onramp and offramp (withdraw and deposit) because banks have banned Binance in UK. Eg if I want to withdraw cash, I send BTC from Binance to Coinbase and sell it there. The 1.5% fee is unavoidable hence I do all trading on Binance now and only when converting to cash would I use Coinbase.

gamaliel9:
I have asked this question before but no reply. Which exchange do you use? Kucoin? Hotbit?

Binance and Coinbase.

I think you may be asking about where I buy shïtcoins - that's on PanCakeSwap via Trust Wallet

The whole hawker thing was a clever marketing gimmick. That girls enunciation of her words while singing was too aje to be a hawker

jedisco:
U mentioned xlm nd stable coyns what's it all about?

Seems they are in the best position to facilitate central Bank Stable coins from most of the chatter I've been seeing.

https://cointelegraph.com/news/peruvian-stablecoin-launches-on-stellar-blockchain

https://www.fxstreet.com/cryptocurrencies/news/xrp-and-xlm-compete-for-cbdc-market-share-202110070654

nna777:
The chart doesn't look good. Below 50 will be a better entry.

Thanks. What support level is best below 50

AIT1:
When is next round boss?

Thursday. Abeg mention me if you see anything cos that will be a busy day for me

Roland17:
5AM GMT I think.

Undercard fights will start at 7P (US Central Time) with main fights starting at 9P (US Central Time). Fury v Wilder should walk into the ring around 12A (US Central Time) if everything goes accordingly.

Thanks. That's too late for me. Man isn't young anymore

jedisco:
A rerest of the 4hr support... Bounce off this nd we should see 0.33...
Fail to hold it and the daily support will come into play

Lining some profits into xrp and ONE wasn't a bad decision afterall

Man, I should have sold at 30. I done reset TP sharply to 29.5

Ebowo:
What of moonpot , abi u did not buy?

I prebought moonpot in anticipation that it will make MVBIII and lost like 50% before MVBIII announcement so I didn't add anything to my position on the announcement cos it seemed heavy profit taking was already going on. Same with CP. For those two, I lost 50% of my investment and sold them shortly after.

I also lost like 70% on Babi and maybe 50% of Kala which I bought in anticipation and they didn't make the list so I sold them on the day of the announcement at loss. Thankfully Babyswap which I had also bought in anticipation had already done a 5x and covered all these losses plus funded half of my MVBIII acquisitions. Babyswap actually did a 10x but I sold on 5x. No time.

For next round, I won't prebuy anything. I will wait till the announcement proper and buy the ones with low marketcap rank (1,000+)

OpenHeaven2019:
Guy you played it super well!

I go join you for the next round.

I dived into a lot things of last month - (top most was defi and exploring new ecosystems), so no time.

But I go try join you for the next round.

Well done sir!

Buy the ones with marketcap rank 1,000 and above. Most of what I bought was ranked 2-4,000 and they all came into the top 1,000. That BNX is now 342 rank. I think I bought it when it was ranked close to 2000. It means they have much room to grow.

I believe one of the criteria Binance uses is to check what events and roadmap they have for the next month and knowing those events may pump the coins, and of course help to market those events, be it a burn, or an added functionality. It's like someone doing your research for you. Most times I don't know what's making them pump. I just sell when they do a few x without knowing anything about them.

Who knows the GMT time for Fury-Wilder fight?

seankafor:
Xrp doing wonders oo

Some people are just good at what they does..shout out to our daily analysts..

I think the only thing they can't see is the quick swing on bearish/bullish market...like those mad Max fury..
Else they ve always got their analysis correct

Should Bullrun continue one should expect an approach toward $2 which is a 2x.

It's little brother, that useless coin XLM is gaining traction for enabling stable coins. I swore I would never buy XLM again, but here we are, I had to get a small bag.

IgiveLadiesBj:
I want to be like you someday. Right now to feed na war...

I'll reference this post later...

When I make my first 10k$ from cryptocurrency.

Well the MVBIII is a slow grind. For folks on BSc shïtcoins, they are used to blowing overnight or their investment turning to dust overnight, but with MVBIII, you have to chill for a month and a 2 to 5x should be sure

nna777:
.

Woke up in time to exit @ 59.

Is $50 a good re-entry?

Ibime:
BNX now 3x for me. Bought on the 15th of Sept when monthly stars was announced at nearly $19, now $56. Something is pumping the coin today so I may sell today when it peaks today. So far, I have turned $3k investment into $8k with MVBIII. Next round being announced on Thursday, I will double my investment per coin

For anyone on MVBIII, I have now sold BNX at $67 from entry price of $19

Only Suter and Hotcross remaining from MVBIII September stars. Suter now 10% up while Hotcross up 50%