₦airaland Forum

Ogbotobo77:
I intend doing that but there's a network fee to be paid in case I wanna transfer to Uniswap to swap..still skeptical abt it though

This story is getting somehow. I don't even see any eth in your wallet to oil the swap. Why would you be sceptical about paying $40 miner fee for $72k worth of coin? Miner fee is not a scam. Can you show us the screenshot on UniSwap when you try to swap the coin to ETH?

Ogbotobo77:
option to exchange it for other coins isn't there...but value is paired with usdt on OKeX exchange,can be swapped on UNSWAP to eth or usdt

Swap to Eth on UniSwap, then send to Binance or whatever solid platform

If it's true, come and share testimony here. It's always good when one of us wins

Madrid are really hitting form just before playing us. They should chill out small.

Ogbotobo77:
it baffles me how I got it...I'm even scared of attempting to transfer it to an exchange then swap cos it seems too good the true

Exchange it in wallet to B.T.C before you transfer. I doubt any reasonable exchange is trading that coin

Ogbotobo77:
it baffles me how I got it...I'm even scared of attempting to transfer it to an exchange then swap cos it seems too good the true

Check whether the contract address matches the one below when you go to sell. Instead of selecting the coin, type in the contract address and if reflects the value in your wallet, then you really own that coin.

0x49e833337ece7afe375e44f4e3e8481029218e5c


You can validate against the address on Coingecko

https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/value-defi


If you really own it, sell it fast cos these shïtcoins could be here today, gone tomorrow

Ogbotobo77:
the VALUE coin....this is atomic wallet

You're saying someone gave you $72k just like that. Do you know the person or someone mistakenly sent to the wrong address?

If that's the case, $40 miner fee is correct (even low). There is no scam in paying miner fee assuming you are using UniSwap. Miner fee goes to those who validate the transaction, not to scammers.

Greatihex:
So, Chelsea will be playing final with PSG most likely.

Amen, Amen and Amen.

Ogbotobo77:
hi guys..was given this coin..seems too good to be true..tried withdrawing it but gas fee was around $40(seems it's under eth network)..has anyone come across this??

Is it the Value coin or the Ignis coin, and which platform is this?

Tor!

popizaino:
Nobody is disputing the fact that midfield work is multidimensional but,you have to agree with me that very few midfielder has it all and not even your favourites has them all. Xavi sucks at defending,Lampard wasn't the very best at controlling. In fact the later treated the ball like hot fire whenever he was under pressure,he championed Chelsea in an era were we were been trolled as a boring and defensive team simply because of his inability to cool the tempo of game when necessary..

And what was Chelsea trolled for during Fabregas era, fighting relegation, missing out on UCL and not smelling UCL semi since 2014 which was a yearly occurrence during Lampard day.

You are talking about an AM like Lampard not controlling game, I have told you time without number that an AM job is punch through, score and assist, not control. You don't expect Muller to control for Bayern, leave that to the deeper midfield like Thiago and co. Control in Lampards time lies with Essien and Ballack who could control.when needed and when they face an opponent like Xavi who they can't control, they know how to hustle to stay competitive. That's why they challenged for title every year and almost always made UCL semi as minimum. Fabregas on the other hand can't control and can't hustle. You have your perception of midfield work backward, hailing deep lying midfielder that can't control or hustle while expecting AM to control. Same way you hail AMs like Eunuch that can't score or assist.

popizaino:
He always found it difficult against the good defensive midfielders like Michael Carrick and xabi Alonso. .

Who.is Carrick? The only reason Chelsea sat back against Manure in late 2000s was tactical, to deny Ronaldo space. Ronaldo was the focus. Ain't nobody worried about Carrick. As soon as Ronaldo left in 2009, they started bullying Carrick again home and away. Carrick ko, Carrick ni.

popizaino:
Modric came to limelight in 2008 after eliminating your favourite Lampard from euro 2008 qualification and by then Fabregas has already been fully established at arsenal. He led his side to a brink of UCL triumph prior to 2008 at such a tender age,so it will be wrong for you to bring modric for comparison........beside, my argument about is early decline was not for his longevity in the game but a price he is paying for maturing early in the game. Even wikipedia confirms there were early concerns about the number of games he played as a youngster and it is the reason for his early decline.

Modric has been shining in Croatia since 2003 and is 2.5 years older than Fabregas, so this holds no weight

Kōinbeezy initial valuation of $65bln

Spy360:
It would be wrong to compare Fab with Xavi or Iniesta, those two were out of this world. But to say Fab couldn't dominate a midfield is also criminally wrong.

From an Arsenal fan.

Fabregas was always dominated against teams of big or equal calibre. Maybe you are talking about small teams which will naturally occur anyway. That's why he was chased from Barca.

We once did an exercise trawling through if Xavis team ever had less possession than opposition team over 5 years and we only found one instance against Madrid with Sneijder in opposition. That is what we call dominating, not bully Crystal Palace one week and be run ragged by Spurs or Everton the next week.

popizaino:
Nobody is disputing the fact that midfield work is multidimensional but,you have to agree with me that very few midfielder has it all and not even your favourites has them all. Xavi sucks at defending,.

Xavi dominates games while Fabregas gets dominated in games. That's the difference. If you can't dominate and you can't defend, you become a liability in a deep midfield position. We might as well raise Socrates from the grave to be giving assists and not dominating nor defending if that's the case. Just allow him drop 15 assists while conceding 30 because of his liability.

And it's not a case of playing too long. He's been a liability since 10 years after his career. Likes of Modric who started career same period are still going.

damzy88:
Are you looking to buy their stock?

No I'm staying away because I don't know how it will go.

Admin9:
so what should i do?

Just prepare an exit plan. As they say, take profits as you go up. After the market crashes, then you can buy to HODL

Admin9:
i bought them when they were low. and i have decided to keep them for long

If you bought them anytime in the last 6 months, they aren't low.

When bear market comes, you will be shouting How low can you go like Ludacris.

BikeMan:
Not everyone wants to play with gidigbo midfielders that you admire, that’s why Fab4 had a great career. Some coaches actually prefer very intelligent midfielders like Fabregas.

No coach preferred Fabregas since 2016. Keep fantasizing on Nairaland while your man has been a bench fodder since 2016. All coaches bench him back-to-back. That's why they are coaches and you are a fan.

Tomorrow is a pivotal day for Crypto with Cøinbaße listing. A good reaction to the stock will increase Institutional belief in crypto, but if the price gets hammered down, it could have a knock-on effect on Institutional investment in crypto.

Admin9:
Hello champions

I am currently hodling

XRP, BNB, DOGE and VET.

I intend holding for 5yrs.

Am I making a good decision?

Bad decision. You don't hold for years at the top of a bull market. Holding starts after the market collapses.

I am very much looking forward to market collapse so I can start buying to HODL.

nihilistjnr:
BTC doesn't have a use case at all. It was designed to be used as currency, but the current narrative of BTC being a store if value means that there's realistically no chance of it being being spent by anyone

I don't want to sound like a typical maxi, but I do believe that if you're looking to hodl over a 15 year period like you described, Ethereeeum is the smart play, because in terms of utility Eith blows BeeTC out of the water. With Visa recently announcing that they will be settling usdt transactions on crypto network, I think it's a matter of time before institutional BeeTC holdings are liquidated for Eith..

The recent growth of binance is driven by the promise of similar utility to Eiith, but it's unlikely to be adopted by global finance due to to its ownership by one man...a Chinese man for that matter.

Eiiith is the long-term hodl play, write this down somewhere and check back in a few years.

Haha. You so much believe in your bag of Eithy. I hope you are not talking yourself into eithy maximalism because you are invested heavily. We're just here for the money man, anything goes.

BikeMan:
Your own football is different. Fabregas and Hojberg are too different kind of midfielders. We are talking about the king of assists here.

Does King of Assists play in a vacuum with no defined position on the pitch?

Matic and Fabregas were two different kind of players but Conte also had to make a choice between them in 2017.

Since Fabregas dropped in the midfield two, he will be judged on the cost-benefit of playing there as opposed to Hojberg, Matic or those two Mali/Guinea niggas at Monaco. The benefit is beautiful assists, the cost is fighting relegation or midtable.

When Fabregas decide to play as an AM, we will compare the cost-benefit against other AMs. He didn't play AM for Chelsea.

Unlimited22:
I like how passionate you are about midfield play and you make excellent points.

The problem is that you only seem to like players who can do everything in midfield excellently. And there are very very few of them. Which is what managers recognise and try to pair up players in midfield who complement each other.

There is a reason Fab has 1 WC with the assist for the winner, 2 Euro and 3 league titles while making significant contributions. You can't just write that off because he can't defend.

He can't defend AND he can't control.

My favourite midfielder of all time Xavi can't defend, but he will control you to sege.

He wasn't played forward at Barca because of Xavi. Xavi was coming to an end and being phased out. He was played forward because he couldn't play midfield effectively.

The fact is Fabregas is not even functional as a midfielder even against the most basic midfield competition. He spent his Barca years and last couple years at Arsenal playing in the attacking phase, not the midfield phase. The pace of modern football ensured there was no more place for him as an AM so he tried to drop into a deep midfield to shambolic effect.

As I have said, to play in the deep portion of midfield, you must have either uber control or be defensvely competitive with decent ball control. It's not a matter of perfection, it's a matter of meeting minimum standards. When you don't meet minimum standards, you end up battling relegation and midtable for two years like Monaco did, fighting midtable like Chelsea in 2015, or taking the Champions of England to a pitiable 5th place position like in 2018. This is the effect of Fabregas in the deep midfield positions. Any manager will love to face him. They will just get someone to press him and run his channel all day to penetrate the defence. Football matches are planned and won on mismatches by targeting the area of most weakness in an opponents team and Fabregas is always the weakest link.

Unlimited22:
Well, he won a lot as a starter even though he had to be played further forward with his country, simply because of the brilliance of Xavi.

At a point he was keeping a striker out of the Spain NT in a major Tournament.

Fab has his deficiencies especially on the defensive side, but to write him off totally is a no-no. There are very few players who are better on the ball and who have his vision and eye for a pass.

All he has is vision. Vision alone does not make a midfielder.

Fabregas was never able to control the midfield, there's the key difference between him and Xavi or Xabi Alonso. Don't confuse having eye for pass with midfield control. They are two separate specialties.

You can be deficient defensively if you can control the ball against most opponents which Xavi and Alonso could do. Fabregas can't do that. All he has is the assist.

That's why he was chased from Barca, and even a B level controller like Jorginho chased him from Chelsea.

He was not able to play AM in the modern game. That could have saved him, but a midfielder lacking controlling or defensive abilities sitting in the midfield two becomes a target for opposition managers. Most managers targeted him right from the Spurs game in Jan 2014, and that's why he became a liability and bench fodder right from the age of 27.

These are facts. You can romanticize all you want about his assists, but we are not here to worship one player but to see our team win consistently and no manager agreed they can win consistently with Fabregas in midfield since the age of 27. Even Matic was better for team consistency in the eyes of the manager and any knowledgeable football fan, and till date some Timbuktu niggas in Monaco are better for them to win consistently than worshipping Fabregas assists at the expense of midfield functionality and team success.

Unlimited22:
He's in his thirties, his legs are gone.

Why did Bayern chase Hojbjerg away? Since he is a killer

Have his legs been gone since 2015 when he has been a bench player back-to-back for 6 seasons straight?

He only just turned 33 and been a bench player since 27. His mates are still starring in top clubs and he can't even make Monaco first eleven after nearly relegating them two seasons in a row.

There is a reason why professional managers keep benching him for 6 seasons while armchair romantics fantasize about his assists. There's nothing to discuss about Fabregas that couldn't even fill common Matic shoes.

The two rough Malian or Guinean niggas benching him at Monaco are not even Hojbergs level.

popizaino:
Some people glorify Horberg but disregard Fabregas


Inside life

Some people only watch football for assist forgetting midfield work is multidimensional - creativity, control and defensive and Fabregas is abysmal at control and defensive aspect.

No wonder Monaco glued him to bench and he could only start 6 matches In Ligue1 this season as they challenge for title. Last season when they gave him shirt, he nearly relegated them.

Two Hojbergs will kill two Fabregas in any midfield battle.

Lemme goan watch Bayern game jare

Unlimited22:
Na God go help you

Like the fabregas didn't deliver a league
and Calabash cup with double digit assists


Oga ibime leave me o let's focus on Porto

He played a good half a season and got targeted by opposition managers as a weak point to beat Chelsea after that. From that point he was more liability than asset.

Unlimited22:


You no go leave Cassanova

And this your anti-Fab agenda is still alive

Man said he misses Fabregas for Kante.

As if Fabregas will not cause 2 goals against for everyone he assist.

The same Kante who replaced Fabregas in midfield and immediately took Chelsea from 10th to Champions.

Fabregas came back in the team to replace Matic the next season and immediately took us to 5th.

Yes, my anti-Fab agenda is very much alive. I don't accept Greek gifts such as accepting beautiful assists in exchange for midfield collapse.

donjazet:
We are finding this match very difficult. I'm just hoping we score first and relieve all this pressure.

What pressure? We are two goals up. The more the match is tight, the better for us and more pressure on Porto.

Bayern Tor!

One more please

ennyjay72:
we didn't control the first leg too

What is Jorginhos job in midfield?

It's only when playing Palace, Sheffield and Newcastle that that one dominates abi?