₦airaland Forum

Even d Fulanis knows dey hv bitten more than dey can chew.

Dey hv been committing dis atrocities all over Nigeria

SW, SS, SE, NW etc

Bit dey choose to attack SE when d tension is high.

That's dre gravest mistake.

Dey attack and even kidnapped Yoruba elders
Nobody talked,

Killed over hundred in AGATU,

MILE 12.

President kept muted.
IGP "muted"
Soyinka "muted"

As stupid as dey re dey felt invisible,

Until dey attack d quite town of NSUKKA,

EVEN DRE grand patron buhari broke d silence

IGP hv to rush 2 Enugu,

Soyinka couldn't hold it anymore

EVEN D senators now are forming security summit.e.

D innocent Hausa Fulanis are presently camped in Military barracks in Enugu, ABA, onitsha.

If I were frm BENUE

I DID BE asking myself if I am a Nigeria.

Why is everyone suddenly showing concern now,

Mind u about 6 were killed in d Enugu while over 300 were massacred in AGATU

D truth is dat You may hate Igbos, but u know dey got balls,

Yes dre is IDP camps in barracks in SE and we know who re occupying it.


Ask any malam near ur house who has a brother in SE

Pple don't get it,
We don't abandoned our pple
Ok
Do u want SE to say SE east state, asaba, ikwere etc summit
No
Moreover
SSSE hv a common enemy (APC) Common goal
Independence/ true federalism

SW u re no more SOUTHERNERS period

mikolo80:
pay to who?nigeria de give visa to indigenes again?

Wallahi even me no understand wetin dis guy dey talk.

gidgiddy:
Yorubas were more interested in showing that they are politically relevant than they cared if the country got worse or not.

this is one of d best analysis I hv cm across in NL.

dey just want to form relevant.
Shikena.

Hagmond:
I dont give a damn about pdp or apc anybody that tries to politizes this killing should be stoned to death
every sw farming communities should harm themselves

Harm kwa

Ooo oyibo

Dis is what I call democracy,
Dis is what d Senate is all about.
To checkmate executives excesses.

The chairman of EFCC should be appointed by d NJC and not d presidency to be used as witch hunting.
In a sane democracy, d lawmakers has more power than d exec.

Dis is exactly how it starts.

Dey gave us only £20 but Lk @ us now,
Just imagine another 49yrs,
Meeehnnnn we rock.

joborskill:
[b]I laugh at the ignorance displayed by many emotionally clouded Nigerians who are against the grazing bill proposed for the Fulani cattle rearers in all states of the Federation. Let's remember that like every other Nigerians, the Fulani's have the right to live and do their business in any part of the country. It is their constitutional right as Nigerians to own grazing fields in any choice location of the country so far it is paid for or provided by the government. We ought to applaud the move made by the federal govt because it will help in ending the unnecessary violence between the Farmers and the Herdsmen. By provision of grazing fields, the fulani's will be restricted to graze on an apportioned land provided by the federal govt. It will be a crime for them to graze their cattles on people's farms once the bill is passed into law. We should not castigate every fulani herdmen as killers because of the few bad ones among them. The incidence in Agatu and other parts of the country were perpetuated by cattle rustlers and not Fulani herdsmen. Cattle rustlers are armed terrorist who steal cattles from herdsmen and graze them around the country as a cover up for their terrorist acts. The ordinary Fulani herdsmen are peaceful people and will never harm innocent Nigerians. The fulani's do not move around with weapons but sticks to guide their cattle. I observed most critics of this Bill are from the eastern part of the country. The igbos need to realize that the federal govt owns all the land and territories in Nigeria and it can decide on how it chooses to use every inch of its territory. The fulani's have every right to graze in the SE and there is nothing any one can do about it. It is their right as a Nigerian just like the igbos are the most travelled tribe doing business in every part of the country. We cannot decide to restrict all igbo traders to the east because of the attitude of few bad eggs amongst them likewise the Fulani's. Most Nigerians criticized the federal govt when they decide to create ranches and import grasses from Brazil to graze these cattles so the herder wont roam about. Now the FG is shifting plans to create a grazing site for the herders in every state which is not a bad move by all standards. We are one Nigeria and we must learn to tolerate ourselves and live in peace. We must shun the politics of hatred and tribalism. Lord Luggard saw the potentials in our diversity before merging us up to form this great country. We must not allow ethnicity to cloud our sense of judgement when the federal govt proposes law that will favour every Nigerian. We must support the grazing bill so the Fulani's can do their business in peace. BTW i am a Yoruba man from the SW. proudly Nigerian [/b]

When will d FG pass traders grazing bill.

So that a portion of KANO, KATSIA, SOKOTO and all over d country


With dedicated Shops will be issued to traders frm d east

without paying a dime. So dat dey can freely do dre business.


Yeye dey really smellll.

And three states are from sophisticated regions,

Ahhhhhha,
IPOB must have tampered with dat list.

D only pple creating diz rivalry is ANAMBRA

2 b honest wit u, m beging to detest them more than I detest d Fulanis

Dre chestbearn is beyond human comprehension,


Can u imagine, dis ANAMBRA guy, I feed u, I cloth u, I accommodate I even give u pocket money nd once
Dis argument comes up, he will start beating chest how ANAMBRA IS superior 2 other IGBOS.

One day I got so pissed up that I said somtn 2 him dat I hv 2 apologies later
Cos no matter what he is still my bro for a very long way.

Dey should just cut dis scrap b4 other igbos we start hatn @'dem.

frank1998:
Who e epp.....my advice to u o.p tough times dnt last but tough people do

C dem, u don become tough pple now,

Y u no tough when Jonathan dey dre.

Yeye dey smell.

A group of KWunu sipping gworo chewing almajiri bastards dey talk, Na him una get time dey reply them.


Let them wallow in their miserable, pedophiliac state.

If, this time a year ago, someone told you the price of oil would be about $1 cheaper, you
probably would've been skeptical – doubtful, even. Since bottoming out at $36.91/barrel
during the Great Recession, crude oil steadily rose, regularly hovering between $80 and
$100/barrel. Of course that all changed in the second half of 2014 when oil plunged over 50 percent,
bottoming out just shy of $50/barrel, marking a change in the commodities market that caught virtually everyone off guard. Experts have yet to reach a consensus on whether oil will return to $100, but recent
events could give us some clues to its future price changes.

s access to an estimated two to four trillion barrels of oil (scientists are continuously updating this figure as research continues) that were otherwise inaccessible. To put that in perspective, Saudi Arabia's oil reserves are the second largest in the world (behind Venezuela), totaling 265 billion barrels in 2009. Saudi Arabia, the de facto leader of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), announced they would no longer cut their oil
production, leading to market over-saturation. Because global demand for oil was already weak to begin with, prices plummeted in a textbook case of supply versus demand.


Why Did Oil Fall in the First Place?

Over the past few years, engineers have utilized a new subterranean oil extraction technique that turns oil shale, a type of rock infused with organic
compounds deep in the Earth's crust, into fuel. This technology gave U.S. oil producers access to an estimated two to four trillion barrels of oil (scientists are continuously updating this figure as research continues) that were otherwise inaccessible. To put that in perspective, Saudi Arabia's oil reserves are the second largest in the world (behind Venezuela), totaling 265 billion barrels in 2009. Saudi Arabia, the de facto leader of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), announced they would no longer cut their oil
production, leading to market over-saturation. Because global demand for oil was already weak to begin with, prices plummeted in a textbook case of supply versus demand.

"We're never going to see $100 [oil] anymore"

Some analysts speculate that Saudi Arabia purposefully kept oil flowing to retain leverage in the oil space, reduce demand for renewable "green" energy, and to put pressure on the U.S. shale revolution. However, Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, member of the Saudi royal family and billionaire entrepreneur, told USA Today that he thought "the decision to not reduce production was prudent, smart and shrewd," but asserted that "Saudi Arabia and OPEC countries did not engineer the reduction in the price of
oil." But one of his statements further in the interview really put a damper on the fledgling oil recover: "I'm sure we're never going to see $100 anymore," he said in the January 2015 interview. "I said a year ago, the price of oil above $100 is artificial. It's
not correct." (For more, see: How Saudi Arabia Benefits From Low Oil Prices.)[/b]If, this time a year ago, someone told you the price of oil would be about $1 cheaper, you
probably would've been skeptical – doubtful, even. Since bottoming out at $36.91/barrel
during the Great Recession, crude oil steadily rose, regularly hovering between $80 and
$100/barrel. Of course that all changed in the second half of 2014 when oil plunged over 50 percent,
bottoming out just shy of $50/barrel, marking a change in the commodities market that caught virtually everyone off guard. Experts have yet to reach a consensus on whether oil will return to $100, but recent
events could give us some clues to its future price changes.

Why Did Oil Fall in the First Place?

Over the past few years, engineers have utilized a new subterranean oil extraction technique that turns oil shale, a type of rock infused with organic
compounds deep in the Earth's crust, into fuel.

This technology gave U.S. oil producers access to an estimated two to four trillion barrels of oil (scientists are continuously updating this figure as research continues) that were otherwise inaccessible. To put that in perspective, Saudi Arabia's oil reserves are the second largest in the world (behind Venezuela), totaling 265 billion barrels in 2009. Saudi Arabia, the de facto leader of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), announced they would no longer cut their oil
production, leading to market over-saturation. Because global demand for oil was already weak to begin with, prices plummeted in a textbook case of supply


Tesla Motors (NASDAQ:TSLA) gets a lot of attention for its plan to build 500,000 electric
vehicles by 2020 and that will play a modest
role in reducing oil consumption.

But the fact
that automakers like Ford (NYSE:F) has been touting electric vehicles and autonomous
vehicles at CES in Las Vegas recently may be
even more important. CEO Mark Fields says
the company's EV and self-driving plans will
be aimed at the mass market, not just luxury
vehicles, which could help drive wide adoption of alternative fuel vehicles in a
decade or less.

There's also Toyota (NYSE: TM), which recently launched the hydrogen powered Mirai on a limited basis. Toyota would argue that
hydrogen is an even better source of energy than electricity EVs use because it's easier to fill your
car with hydrogen.


Adding to the plans of Tesla Motors, Ford and Toyota, tech companies like Google (NASDAQ: GOOG) putting over a million miles on autonomously driven vehicles and you have a level of
disruption to energy and transportation that we haven't seen in a century. OPEC has to be worried that tech companies and automakers are going to develop new products
that bypass oil to transport people, denting demand. Remember,

when oil dropped from $100 to
$35 per barrel it was because the market was oversupplied by about 1-2 million barrels per day,
which is less than 3% of demand everyday. Oil prices are extremely sensitive to demand changes
and OPEC can't afford to lose a significant number of customers to electric or hydrogen vehicles
or we could see prices decline even further than they did in 2015.

OPEC is in trouble and it knows it When you look at the macro trends above you begin to see that OPEC can't let oil jump to $100
per barrel. It risks allowing competitors like shale drillers to take share and it also kills demand for
oil. In addition, it has to cash in on oil while it can because companies like Tesla, Ford, Toyota, and
Google are building vehicle platforms that don't require oil as their base source of energy. OPEC is stuck between a rock and a hard place, forcing some very difficult decisions for the oil CARTEL.

Longer term:

I see new, cleaner technologies continuing to take share, slowly diminishing our need
for oil. Add it up and the days of $100 oil are behind us. That's good news or bad news, depending
on who you ask.


www.investopedia.com/articles/active-trading/061815/will-oil-ever-go-back-100.asp

www.fool.com/investing/general/2016/01/09/oil-prices-why-oil-may-never-hit-100-per-barrel-ag.aspx


Conclusion: I think that the days of oil boom is over.
I believe is high time Nigeria starts developing its Human capital.

If, this time a year ago, someone told you the price of oil would be about $1 cheaper, you
probably would've been skeptical – doubtful, even. Since bottoming out at $36.91/barrel
during the Great Recession, crude oil steadily rose, regularly hovering between $80 and
$100/barrel. Of course that all changed in the second half of 2014 when oil plunged over 50 percent,
bottoming out just shy of $50/barrel, marking a change in the commodities market that caught virtually everyone off guard. Experts have yet to reach a consensus on whether oil will return to $100, but recent
events could give us some clues to its future price changes.

Why Did Oil Fall in the First Place?

Over the past few years, engineers have utilized a new subterranean oil extraction technique that turns oil shale, a type of rock infused with organic
compounds deep in the Earth's crust, into fuel. This technology gave U.S. oil producers access to an estimated two to four trillion barrels of oil (scientists are continuously updating this figure as research continues) that were otherwise inaccessible. To put that in perspective, Saudi Arabia's oil reserves are the second largest in the world (behind Venezuela), totaling 265 billion barrels in 2009. Saudi Arabia, the de facto leader of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), announced they would no longer cut their oil
production, leading to market over-saturation. Because global demand for oil was already weak to begin with, prices plummeted in a textbook case of supply versus demand.

"We're never going to see $100 [oil] anymore"

Some analysts speculate that Saudi Arabia purposefully kept oil flowing to retain leverage in the oil space, reduce demand for renewable "green" energy, and to put pressure on the U.S. shale revolution. However, Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, member of the Saudi royal family and billionaire entrepreneur, told USA Today that he thought "the decision to not reduce production was prudent, smart and shrewd," but asserted that "Saudi Arabia and OPEC countries did not engineer the reduction in the price of
oil." But one of his statements further in the interview really put a damper on the fledgling oil recover: "I'm sure we're never going to see $100 anymore," he said in the January 2015 interview. "I said a year ago, the price of oil above $100 is artificial. It's
not correct." (For more, see: How Saudi Arabia Benefits From Low Oil Prices.)[b]If, this time a year ago, someone told you the price of oil would be about $1 cheaper, you
probably would've been skeptical – doubtful, even. Since bottoming out at $36.91/barrel
during the Great Recession, crude oil steadily rose, regularly hovering between $80 and
$100/barrel. Of course that all changed in the second half of 2014 when oil plunged over 50 percent,
bottoming out just shy of $50/barrel, marking a change in the commodities market that caught virtually everyone off guard. Experts have yet to reach a consensus on whether oil will return to $100, but recent
events could give us some clues to its future price changes.

Why Did Oil Fall in the First Place?

Over the past few years, engineers have utilized a new subterranean oil extraction technique that turns oil shale, a type of rock infused with organic
compounds deep in the Earth's crust, into fuel. This technology gave U.S. oil producers access to an estimated two to four trillion barrels of oil (scientists are continuously updating this figure as research continues) that were otherwise inaccessible. To put that in perspective, Saudi Arabia's oil reserves are the second largest in the world (behind Venezuela), totaling 265 billion barrels in 2009. Saudi Arabia, the de facto leader of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), announced they would no longer cut their oil
production, leading to market over-saturation. Because global demand for oil was already weak to begin with, prices plummeted in a textbook case of supply versus demand.

"We're never going to see $100 [oil] anymore"

Some analysts speculate that Saudi Arabia purposefully kept oil flowing to retain leverage in the oil space, reduce demand for renewable "green" energy, and to put pressure on the U.S. shale revolution. However, Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, member of the Saudi royal family and billionaire entrepreneur, told USA Today that he thought "the decision to not reduce production was prudent, smart and shrewd," but asserted that "Saudi Arabia and OPEC countries did not engineer the reduction in the price of
oil." But one of his statements further in the interview really put a damper on the fledgling oil recover: "I'm sure we're never going to see $100 anymore," he said in the January 2015 interview. "I said a year ago, the price of oil above $100 is artificial. It's
not correct." (For more, see: How Saudi Arabia Benefits From Low Oil Prices.)[/b]If, this time a year ago, someone told you the price of oil would be about $1 cheaper, you
probably would've been skeptical – doubtful, even. Since bottoming out at $36.91/barrel
during the Great Recession, crude oil steadily rose, regularly hovering between $80 and
$100/barrel. Of course that all changed in the second half of 2014 when oil plunged over 50 percent,
bottoming out just shy of $50/barrel, marking a change in the commodities market that caught virtually everyone off guard. Experts have yet to reach a consensus on whether oil will return to $100, but recent
events could give us some clues to its future price changes.

Why Did Oil Fall in the First Place?

Over the past few years, engineers have utilized a new subterranean oil extraction technique that turns oil shale, a type of rock infused with organic
compounds deep in the Earth's crust, into fuel.

This technology gave U.S. oil producers access to an estimated two to four trillion barrels of oil (scientists are continuously updating this figure as research continues) that were otherwise inaccessible. To put that in perspective, Saudi Arabia's oil reserves are the second largest in the world (behind Venezuela), totaling 265 billion barrels in 2009. Saudi Arabia, the de facto leader of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), announced they would no longer cut their oil
production, leading to market over-saturation. Because global demand for oil was already weak to begin with, prices plummeted in a textbook case of supply versus demand.

"We're never going to see $100 [oil] anymore"

Some analysts speculate that Saudi Arabia purposefully kept oil flowing to retain leverage in the oil space, reduce demand for renewable "green" energy, and to put pressure on the U.S. shale revolution. However, Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, member of the Saudi royal family and billionaire entrepreneur, told USA Today that he thought "the decision to not reduce production was prudent, smart and shrewd," but asserted that "Saudi Arabia and OPEC countries did not engineer the reduction in the price of
oil." But one of his statements further in the interview really put a damper on the fledgling oil recover: "I'm sure we're never going to see $100 anymore," he said in the January 2015 interview. "I said a year ago, the price of oil above $100 is artificial. It's
not correct." (For more, see: How Saudi Arabia Benefits From Low Oil Prices.)


Tesla Motors (NASDAQ:TSLA) gets a lot of attention for its plan to build 500,000 electric
vehicles by 2020 and that will play a modest
role in reducing oil consumption.

But the fact
that automakers like Ford (NYSE:F) has been touting electric vehicles and autonomous
vehicles at CES in Las Vegas recently may be
even more important. CEO Mark Fields says
the company's EV and self-driving plans will
be aimed at the mass market, not just luxury
vehicles, which could help drive wide adoption of alternative fuel vehicles in a
decade or less.

There's also Toyota (NYSE: TM), which recently launched the hydrogen powered Mirai on a limited basis. Toyota would argue that
hydrogen is an even better source of energy than electricity EVs use because it's easier to fill your
car with hydrogen.


Adding to the plans of Tesla Motors, Ford and Toyota, tech companies like Google (NASDAQ: GOOG) putting over a million miles on autonomously driven vehicles and you have a level of
disruption to energy and transportation that we haven't seen in a century. OPEC has to be worried that tech companies and automakers are going to develop new products
that bypass oil to transport people, denting demand. Remember,

when oil dropped from $100 to
$35 per barrel it was because the market was oversupplied by about 1-2 million barrels per day,
which is less than 3% of demand everyday. Oil prices are extremely sensitive to demand changes
and OPEC can't afford to lose a significant number of customers to electric or hydrogen vehicles
or we could see prices decline even further than they did in 2015.

OPEC is in trouble and it knows it When you look at the macro trends above you begin to see that OPEC can't let oil jump to $100
per barrel. It risks allowing competitors like shale drillers to take share and it also kills demand for
oil. In addition, it has to cash in on oil while it can because companies like Tesla, Ford, Toyota, and
Google are building vehicle platforms that don't require oil as their base source of energy. OPEC is stuck between a rock and a hard place, forcing some very difficult decisions for the oil CARTEL.

Longer term:

I see new, cleaner technologies continuing to take share, slowly diminishing our need
for oil. Add it up and the days of $100 oil are behind us. That's good news or bad news, depending
on who you ask.


www.investopedia.com/articles/active-trading/061815/will-oil-ever-go-back-100.asp

www.fool.com/investing/general/2016/01/09/oil-prices-why-oil-may-never-hit-100-per-barrel-ag.aspx


Conclusion: I think that the days of oil boom is over.
I believe is high time Nigeria starts developing its Human capital.

AntiWailer:
Please if you don't understand simple things you can as well shut up.

That Buhari is fulani does not mean he is protecting Fulani.

Fulanis are attacking a settlement under a Local Government I State with a Governor and House Of Rep Members and senators.

Fulani' attack is not an act of terrorism yet you compared them to Boko Haram. Their attack is a consequence of a particular action and can be curtailed by the State Government.

Hold your Councillor, Local Government Chairmen, Governors, House Of Rep member and Senators responsible.

Pls MISTER Antiwailer.

Ur name should be Zombie,

Who controls d ARMY?

Who CONTROL D POLICE?

mind u this FULANI may not be NIGERIANS, they may Ghanian, Cameroonian or Chadian Fulanis.

So why would d IMMIGRATION even allow them into our bother,

Or is it d STATE that control d IMMIGRATION?

I tell u why.


Cos Fulanis c dem self as one, infact they re one. It is dre nomadic life style that scattered them, so as long as diz

Country is being ruled by Fulanis from Military, Immigration, FG, etc dis muderous bastards will Alwayz find abode here.

tinnymerit:
There is a way that seems right but the end therof is destruction.With all what you wrote,are you saying ojukwu that led millions into genocide and ran away by dressing like an hajia is better of than the president? Little wonder many of you are blindly supporting that ilooter from ekiti and even rated him more than awolowo.Awolowo that even both kanu and ojukwu cannot even untie his sandals let alone stand with him.I shake my head for you guys.Meanwhile,gbagbo i heard is a lecturer abroad and not in ur suppossed prison or incarceration like ur suppossed MESSIAH kanu that said he has armoured tanks but since his arrest no bullet was shot on behalf of him.

Are you people being intentionally ignorant or u just want to make a fool of urself?

Am just Asking.

I have read this rubbish u put up here many times and I cant just comprehend how your shallow minds navigate Tru barren desert lurking for a solace.

OJUKWU declaration of BIAFRA WAS an attempt to save the Igbos who were being massacred in the North in 1967.

OJUKWU BELIVED THAT IGBOS ARE NO MORE SAVE, IN THE UNION CALLED NIGERIA.

AND
Let me remind that it was the Nigerian Army that came calling in our border,

With armored tanks,

All he did was to fight back, which every rightly born IGBO SON WE DO
WHEN PUSHED TO A CORNER.

MAY HIS INDOMITABLE SPIRIT FOREVER LIVE IN OUR BODY AND SOUL.

UNLIKE CONE HEAD PPLE. Who would retreat to their dead conclaves when duty beckons on them
2 defend dre father land, MILE 12 come to mind.

subterfuge:
WIKE has no hand in this.
Geisa Khan acted on her own.
She just loves Wike

Dis APC NEVER ceases to amuse me.

Like seriously.

On a free and fair Election will APC WIN ANY ELECTION IN RIVERS

IF PDP gave her money, it must be to counter any bribe Amechi would hv promised her


Just Amechi countered Atiku Dollars in APC PRIMARIES even thoguh free and fair pple will vote .dulllarddiiddiinho.
RIVERS IS LIKE PDP having illusion of winning Katsina State.
baffles me sometimes

If,PDP ZONING Jis anything to go by,

RIBADU/OSITA CHIDOKA OR WILLIE OBIANO


WILL change this country,


Dey re all young educated, experienced, civilized, organized, and full of VISSIONS.

For the first time, Nigerian economy is now rated by credit rating agencies (Fitch, and Standard and Poor’s). Even on corruption perception, Nigeria is far better
today than in 1999, and PDP created the two major anti-corruption agencies — ICPC and EFCC, and as at 2014 TI scored Nigeria 2.7 and ranked 136 out of 175
countries. PDP secured debt relief for Nigeria, thereby relieving Nigeria from the stranglehold of the IMF/World Bank policy conditionalities. APC does not have to
negotiate with Washington on many economic policies. The list is long. PDP passed the 2015 Administration of criminal Justice bill, a perfect document in
fighting corruption The point therefore is that despite the fall in oil price, APC is starting from a much stronger base than PDP did in 1999 and the challenge now is to do far better.
In the coming years, Nigerians will be asking APC to show us their figures!

By SOLUDO.


Soludo is a respected Igbo Son, but it seems like he is just. Trying to score Cheap Political Points dis dayz.

D problem with dis Yoruba folks is trying to create another Okonjo Iweal out of kemi.

@ OP u for just say " some arms " not large cache of Arms.
Dis one no reach wetin boys dey carry go bush does years
And where is d hide out? Abi dey don cover dat side?

It seems u don't understand China,

China is trying to kill Africa's Manufacturing Sectir so that the can flood dre product in all Africa.

China practices a currency system that is based on fixation.

They tend to adjust dre currency to create undervalued share against us dollar.

So what if us Dollars depreciate 2morow and China wanting to shrug off competitions on prices of finished
Commodity dey will have to peg yuan lower.

Dre rendering d debt dey gave us valueless.
So dey rather give us loan on floating currency.
While our clueless govt buy Chinese Bond


Your question should be,

Why buy Chinese Bond, why hv our reserve in China

A currency dat can be Devalued anyday by China just to have advantage in Export PMI.

Make I cucuma go buy
Confirm Adidas trainee for that March.


Notn dey Kpa, anytyn wey Kpa Na witch.

REAL MEN ON SUIT.

When will the Navy or Army gear up for Fulani herdsmen,
I don't think dre is anybody on this that Irritate me like dulladiiiiiiiinho

Karma is really a bastard
He bleeps ur assssss without condom

@op How much were. Paid to write this trash,
Whoever paid u should ask for hs/her money back.

Even killing of IPOB PEACEFULLY demonstrators must be investigated.
Thank u Aljazeera fir publicizing it.

Gerreeeeeh meeeehn