₦airaland Forum

cococandy:
Yet they exist.

Can’t wish them away.

AmazonTopaz:
America is doomed

Congratulations to the idiots.

AmazonTopaz:
America is doomed

Congratulations to the idiots.

AmazonTopaz:
America is doomed

Congratulations to the idiots.

luminouz:
Did you guys see the trending videos of that Equatorial Guinea ANIF(EFCC-like) Director that was fucking women everywhere?

I watched one of the public displayed videos and that dude is basically what the redpill talks of. It's a proof that the redpill is valid.

Redpill is amoral, and the dude is a prime example of how women don't give a damn about your money, power but their own interests.

On the moral side, fûcking his uncle and cousin's wives was a bad move. He even fûcked a relative of the president. I'm kinda sorry for him because those shamed men would never let him leave the prison alive. But goddamn, that mudafucker can fûck!!!

ubunja:
Okay, what I'm going to say will have many variables and question marks and holes,, but I'm just putting it out there to give a general idea of things. It must not be taken as a complete, ironclad theory or set of principles.

Bro you're on point on this.

Never invest in a woman because you're just improving her SMV (sexual market value). Which will activate her hypergamy. Keep her where you found her and use your money in such a way that if she disconnects from you and goes, she'll find herself where you found her.

There's a huge difference between marrying a beautiful woman whose hair, nails and makeup are top notch AND marrying a plain woman then making her beautiful with good hair, nails and makeup. The first is you getting what you deserve or can afford. While the second is you INVESTING in a woman - Which is what men must avoid. You can use your money to maintain a slay queen. But if you find an average girl and turn her into a slay queen then you're investing in her. Which will backfire spectacularly, Because after you're done with her, her SMV will be higher than when she started, which means she's now considering you BELOW HER - nevermind you yourself improved her said SMV.

Investing in a woman includes things improving a woman's education, helping her start her own business (which will inevitably lead to her independence from you) etc. You must keep her dependent. Supply her needs and wants without putting her in a position where she can replace you. She must not own anything but be happy. (Hard but not impossible) . You must be her provider, not investor. You can very well give a woman a good life, a nice home, fun trips and good experiences without investing in her. But just showing her how much you love her.

Pïmps mastered this game ages ago. They keep all the money but make sure their women get the best of anything - the best accommodation, the best food and the best outfits. The women get everything they ask for - except for cold hard cash. That's always a no. These pïmps even do the shopping on behalf of their women to stay ahead of the game. Cause give a woman cash, no matter how little - she'll find a way to grow it. It's their gift. Pïmps prevent this and keep cash away from women.

This may seem unfair, cruel or extreme in this day and age; but women do play the same game with men as regards to sex. A Woman always keeps a man dependent and relying on her and her alone for sex. A man is not allowed to even masturbate. If a married man services himself you'll hear all the wailings from women shaming him and demanding to know if his wife is not enough for him!! He'll be Condemned for destroying his wife's self-esteem and confidence. He must always get his sex from the wife. If she's not in the mood, he must wait for her. Not go elsewhere. Not even to a prostitute.

Now, because women are masters of the game, they monopolized the sex and also monopolized men's money:
Did not our elders, fathers and uncles hand over their own hard-earned money to their women, the WOMEN who would then give the men money bit by bit on a daily basis as the needs arise, eg every morning he's given transport money and every weekend he's given beer money. This was the norm a few generations ago in many places. This is how cunning women have been. Pïmps merely give women a taste of their own medicine - with brilliant results. It needs be that men start looking closely at how those flesh peddlers mastered women.

But many men are intent on achieving women's growth. They'll take a woman from the bottom and keep pouring money into her growth until she outgrows him. Then she leaves. Men are out here educating their wives, getting their women plastic surgery, buying investments and the like. Which is foolish.
All that money and effort and even plastic surgery must have been for themselves. For the men. To keep their own SMV ever so high. And yes I said it, men must not shy away from plastic surgery. If you've something about your face that you don't like, save money and go get it fixed. Leave the scratches and scars, they add to your masculine beauty. But that nose, that eye, those ears - get them fixed if you ain't happy. Same goes for teeth: if yours are discolored, go whiten them. If they're crooked, consider investing in braces to straighten them. If a front tooth is missing, move heaven and earth to replace it. All this may sound all too shallow and even feminine... But it will pay dividends. Cause combine this with the body game (gym) and you're an Adonis. women will come. And you won't be invested in any of them because you invested, instead, in yourself.

Skepticus:
You need to get your head out there.

Western men are fûcked deeply.

Africa, certain parts of Asia and the Middle east are the last bastions of decent masculinity and patriarchy.

Sadly, the simping culture is creeping up on our young men. I've seen university boys sacrifice their tuition fees for birthdays of women, do other stupid things as vagina worshippers etc.

One of the reasons why it hasn't gain much strong footing here is that men, on a general aren't earning much (weak economy), so women on average (who earn much lower than their men who also earn poorly) have to show traits of submission.

In the first world economies, high earning for men also improved the status for women and the men goofed by failing the biggest shit test, Feminism

Skepticus:


Women aren't stronger in anyway. They are still the same entitled and manipulative piece of shît everywhere around the globe.

The big problem is the men lowering their standards, which women exploit.

From birth, the dominant masculine frame of males is being attacked and consistently derailed by popular culture (TV, Movies, books, Music), food (Soy and other testosterone degrading foods), and the Government (leftist political correctness, feminism, gynocentric family courts).

Martinez39s:
Men need to realise there is no nawalt anywhere, and there is nothing like happily ever after, just blissful ignorance and willful endurance. We should not forget so easily as redpill men that a woman's word count for nothing but her actions are what we look at. We don't even need their actions since the redpill has given us a sufficient grasp of their nature.

(1) Because she says she is not a feminist doesn't mean it is true.
(2) Because she says she cares about men's issues doesn't mean it is true.
(3) Because she says she desires the downfall of gynocentrism doesn't mean it is true.
(4) During courtship/dating, because she says she would never do what other women did to their husbands in the divorce courts and take your kids away from you doesn't mean she will act differently.

Presenting herself as a nawalt doesn't mean she is a nawalt. There are no nawalt unicorns. Have you ever noticed that in western countries there have been numerous protests by women against sexism, the mythical wage gap, and so-called patriarchy, but there have never been a vigorous campaign by women against the divorce courts systems, criminal child support laws, parental alienation against fathers, and gynocentrism? Not even by the so-called traditional and conservative women and nawalt unicorns. The so-called traditional unicorns just bash feminism and rarely agree with basic redpill talking points on social media just to send out nawalt signals to unsuspecting and naive men.

The realms of relationship and male-female relation are brutal games. Because men, being idealistic lovers, don't see it as a game doesn't mean women don't see it as a game. It's all a game to a woman and they are always playing, twenty-four-seven. Their games are never hindered by morality and rationality, it's all self-centeredness and self-interest. The girl you think is different and you have committed to is running a game on you, and she can maintain her act however long it is necessary. Just like some men are better than others in sports, some women are better than other women in the game of manipulation even though all of them are formidable. Never underestimate the manipulative prowess, pettiness, subtlety and coldness of a woman's heart. Female nature is brutal and unrelenting. I rest my case.

Martinez39s:
I do agree with angelfallz when it comes to not trusting women as allies (in fighting gynocentrism and feminism) or verbal sources of red pill knowledge. Knowing what we know as red pill men, and knowing how manipulative, deceitful, cunning, subtle, and cold the hearts of women can be when it comes to always pushing the female agenda, we just cannot trust any woman. I am not necessarily saying that all women are basically the same (I think they are) but you need to play safe whether or not you believe in unicorns (I don't). Men have to stop trusting women to care about men's issues and topple the toxic and brutal edifice called gynocentrism. Smart zebras cannot trust lions to care about any zebra's life.

• It's sad that men position themselves to be deceived easily by women. Because a woman says she hate feminism doesn't mean she hates feminism. Since when did we start ignoring the chameleon antics of women? A lot of smart women pose as traditional unicorns to lure unsuspecting men; a woman can maintain her chameleon act for up to 25 years or more if need be. It's all a matter of reputation.

• Some redpill men believe some women are not capable of introspection? Oh my goodness! All women are capable of introspection but they don't care about changing. Why should they change and be morally upright and ethical in the way they use men? If they did, they would compromise the benefits of gynocentrism, feminism and the benefits that comes with keeping men bluepilled (securing the bag and acquiring resources from men). So what is the need? What makes female nature all the more disappointing is that women know right from wrong but they still don't care since they are dominated by step self-centeredness and lack of sympathy when it comes to keeping men in the dark about female nature, using and discarding men, and supporting each other when no one is watching. This holds even when it is utterly unnecessary. Female nature takes no prisoners. Women understand themselves and they know that they are trash (from the ethical and moral perspective).

• To show you that women are aware of what they are doing to men, each time they want to hook a man, many of them come up with good behaviours and NAWALT talking points until after marriage or when they shit test you and see that you are willing to put up with their bullshit. Ask many Nigerian men, even ask western men where the marriage contract puts their balls in their wives' hands. Where did the act come from?

Never trust a woman. I just shake my head when I see manospheres and redpill groups permitting female attendants, why? What are they really expecting from these women? Even if you think they are genuine, does it make sense to trust people to fight against a system that benefits them? When women infiltrate redpill or MRA groups, they are not coming to aid you, their cardinal aim is to see how far we have gone in figuring them out and how they can use what we know to perpetuate the nawalt illusion and keep us in the dark. Beside, to befriend your enemies and feign sympathy for his/her troubles are effective and dangerous techniques that can destroy an enemy and keep them divided and confused. The females who claim to be allies usually recycle points that core redpillers discovered themselves but notice how they never add anything new to our knowledge base; it's all a facade.

We men need to wise up. Beware of the nawalt illusion, I don't believe in unicorns. When you start talking like a redpiller, the first thing women try to do is convince you that not all women are like that, why? They are trying to send you back to the plantation to search for a nawalt. Someone's hoe or toxic thorn in the flesh, present or past, is another person's nawalt somewhere else. The nawalt illusion is a big weak point of any redpill man. With this illusion, all a woman has to do to make you fall is present herself as a nawalt. When you believe a woman is a nawalt, you start making mistakes that simps and bluepillers make without knowing even if you think you have things under control and you have vetted her. Lol. Never underestimate the manipulative prowess, coldness and deceit of a woman. When it comes to the female agenda, even your mum will place your sisters and other women above you no matter what.

It doesn't matter her upbringing or culture, female nature is universal. It is not misogyny to have men-only spaces. Women can have their own spaces, why can't we? I leave us with this meme to ponder deeply.

Skepticus:
Women hold the key to heterosexual sex. They determine if sex happens. Socioeconomic issues (like seeking men for money as a result of poverty or for male protection in times of conflicts/war) and the influence of mind-altering drugs (like Rohypnol, alcohol) may lower her natural inhibitions and increase her urge to make sex happen. She holds the key, regardless. Anything beyond any of those i stated above would be practically considered as rape, which is not encouraged in the Red Pill.

In biology, they (women) are considered more reproductively successful than men, meaning that no matter how ugly or beautiful a woman looks, no matter how terrible her attitude is, no matter how broke or rich she is, even if she has mental retardation, as long as she has a functioning womb, she would always find a man to have sex with her and get pregnant. Men don't have that advantage.

In the light of medical advancement (invention of birth-control pills, safer abortion methods), feminism, sexual freedom for women, the lowering of the social standards that check women's tendency for hypergamy and promiscuity, increase in male virginity (statistics from Europe and the United States) and other liberal nonsense that encourages the vanity of women, women are having more sex than men.

The women who are not having sex have either deliberately chosen not to have sex for varying reasons (like religious celibacy, hormonal issues or a psychological aversion to sex) or haven't had the OPPORTUNITY to be in a position where they can have sex. The former (women who deliberately stay away from sex) is a minority when compared to the latter (have you ever wondered why female teenagers or relationship/married women go promiscuous when they are away from the prying eyes of their parents/boyfriends/husbands when they get to higher institutions/vacations/night outs etc). A woman already gets propositioned for sex as soon as she hits puberty as early as 9 years as she typically attains sexual maturity before boys in her age range. In a research conducted recently, Girls reported having their first consensual sex as early as 13 years. Boys (on average) was 23 years of age.

An increase in the amount of male SIMPs and INCELized men over the years says a lot.

slaawomirr:
Damnnn niggar


What da fuckkk I thought it was the real niggar.... I mean the real vinicius

The funny and obvious truth is that records got it that 80 percent of first born between a married man and woman actually doesn't belong to the man

The truth is we men should be careful with all these women ....

Imagine a married woman here in Benin city is even ready to bang me...but what is holding me back is the fact that what if I mistakenly ejaculate inside her body then she will pin the pregnancy on her husband