₦airaland Forum

pansophist:
1. Since you have started it, then please complete it, to avoid wasting the time/resources/efforts already invested. Also, having a university degree has its own privileges, regardless of the field of study.

2. But you must formulate a career/moneymaking plan that is transnational, i.e., not location and naira-dependent. Some people do it on YouTube, some do it via online selling, freelancing, IT, etc.

3. If you have nothing to your name and have to grow from zero, then your best shot at success is in a field that is skill-based, not degree/certification-based, although, certification can be a complement.

4. This means that you are good at those skills, e.g. Usain Bolt doesn't have a degree in running, but he trained for over 20 years just to run for 10 seconds and be the fastest man.

5. So learn a skill, be it making the best suits, making the beast steak, or being a god in programming, app design, writing, website building, etc. You don't have to do the skills I mentioned, they are just examples.

6. But you must know also that you do not have the privilege of being selective or picky or doing your hobby. My hobby is sleeping at home and hope my account balance increases, but life doesn't work that way.

7. So it is about the formula that works, and skill-based professionals will always be sought after. Get your degree for the sake of it, but along the line, create time to perfect a skill, and then monetization is next.

8. But one that is easily accessible to all regardless of background is IT-related fields. So programming, designing, website building, animations, sketching, UI, etc., or creating IT solutions for business.

9. If you go to Udemy.com, there are some Nigerians teaching there, and they have students from all over the world paying for their courses. Even on YouTube, there are big Nigerian chefs selling courses in USD, and making thousands monthly.

10. It is about taking your destiny into your own hands. So you must first understand you don't have a country, and operate on that basis. So your flesh should be in Nigeria, but formulate your affairs in a way that your income does not depend on it.

11. Now all these might take you years to achieve, depending on the fire burning inside you, but if you are serious, it can take you two years, or even less.

12. Another advantage of a skill-based strategy is that it is less expensive. If you want to be a programmer, for example, you need only a laptop, free courses that are scattered online, and DRIVE. The drive is the most important thing.

13. You have to want it like you are dying tomorrow. And spend at least three hours (usually 8hours) on it every day. Elon Musk, for example, that man has more drive than me.

Go check out his working routine, and you will understand why some people are poor, and some are wealthy. Elon Musk is a man who sleeps on the Tesla factory floor, working round the clock, just to make use of every second in a 24-hour circle.

14. Such drive is what you need, and no forces on earth will be able to stop you. Even Nigeria, lol. Just make sure your skill is something transnational, so no barbing, painting, a vulcanizing. You can't export, duplicate, and scale such skills.

Now,I will love to shed more light on these because I got that gut feelings some readers were taking aback by it.
Men,you need to disillusion yourselves from these "soulmates" believe.
Women know better .[/b]
Women's idea of "soulmate" is strongly rooted on your ability to provide her a better chances for the survival of herself and her children.
For men,it's primarily governed by feelings .
Women are pragmatic in situations like these,men live on the idea of it, largely governed by emotions .
You could vividly remember when you where younger, there's that girl you thought was your "soulmate",life happened,and you moved on ,met another "soulmate" in a later period in your life,maybe in the university or college,you can literally lay your life for her,but again,shit hit the fan,life goes on.
Maybe these time around you have met another "soulmate" ,and that's the shit you're dealing with right now.
I want to call your attention to a picture you could vividly relate to. You happen to meet one of these your "soulmates" when you're younger,now, what impression would you still have about them and yourself ?
Most likely, embarrassed and disgusted at yourself for probably disgracing yourself and your ancestors for simping for that lady some once upon a time.
That's life bro, you got better,more refined and your taste changed.
It's safe to say your choice of "soulmate" is highly dominated by emotion and your environment at that point in life, it's fluid and dynamic.
That's it guys, that's it.
The idea of "soulmates" have made men basically subject their progeny to untold pains.
Cases of SS man marrying an SS woman,believing "she's the one",thereby subjecting the child to a lifetime of drugs and medications. Your children don't deserve these.
Trust me ,they don't.
Cases of men killing themselves when a lady moves on to better options ,with the believe he will never found "his missing rib" and better woman out there. I wish he knew better.
Many men has gotten themselves stuck in a life of misery because of the notion that she's "the one".
What of cases of men divorcing and remarrying over and over again because he believed there is a special woman out there for him ?
Many disheartening tales out there just because a man believed the lie of "soulmate".
There's only good and bad women out there, there's no one specially designed for you.
Men, it's your responsibility to make a good of the woman you want to have serious commitment with,else you're going to pay dearly for your weak masculinity.

Best regards.

pansophist:
Maybe not the hardest, but one of the hardest things about being a man.

I have to be ''something'' before I will be loved and enjoy good things in life. Unlike women who enjoy something I call ''status by association'' (e.g. a king's wife is a queen, but it does work the other way round). To enjoy anything, I must work for it myself.

And the male world is extremely fiercely competitive. Some men are smarter, richer, highly connected, and more well-educated than you. They also benefit from old money and have monopolized many industries, and you are a latecomer.

As you attempt to climb high the hierarchy, forces are drawing you back such as responsibilities to others, to yourself,

For men, if he is lucky, the only window they have to escape and have a good shot at life is when they are teenagers to maybe 25 years old max. Under the assumption that his parents can still hold it down, he goes into the world and punches hard.

But if his parents are getting old, or don't have anything built that he can use as a stepping stone to launch, and even worse, he has to save them, then he probably won't be successful for life.

Your hard work is just a slice of the pie of success. Things such as comparative advantages, nationality, social status, educational level, inheritance, who you know, parental support, etc, will go far in making a man successful.

And to make it worse, ignorance of this dynamic is the final nail to a man's coffin. I don't know a man who understands this thing and will waste time chasing women or feeling like he is lost when a woman says no.

You have such a huge battle ahead of you, how can the disapproval of a mere immortal, one out of billions make you lose sleep? Especially when she compliments and will benefit from your hustle, and not the other way round?

Your worst sin is that you've destroyed and betrayed yourself for nothing" - Fyodor Dostoevsky,

Martinez39s:
In the red-pill manosphere, it cannot be overemphasized that females are: (1) incapable of loving you, they are interested in what they can benefit from you and how you make them feel. Even at that, they don't love you; (2) they are extremely self-centered, (3) they see us as expendable utilities; (4) They don't appreciate, they are entitled, and they see us as utilities whose labour and resources they are entitled to

Skepticus:
You know what to do. We don suppose pass dis level.

I would never advise you to buy her a phone even if you can afford to buy a million IPhone12s. All these stories of "I-bought-her-a-phone never ends well for the men who do it, from stories I read online and those I know personally. She uses you to "upgrade" to meet men with more SMV than you do, or richer SIMPs. When you challenge her for doing it, you'll get shamed for being "insecure" and she uses the opportunity to get out of your life (and safely, with your investments in her). The only set of female folks you should buy a phone for includes your mum, sisters, female relatives and your wife or a woman who has proven herself to be worthy of your commitment in Marriage. You must also be sure it is needed and necessary. She must be highly deserving of it and not manipulating/threatening you into getting it.

Telling you that you don't love her if you don't buy a phone is manipulative and pricking at your manly ego. A reason we tell guys that women (generally) don't love. They are only attracted to the value of material things and attention you give them. Dare her to do her worst. The worst she can do is to walk away from you to another mugu who may be more than happy to do the job. Na only pusssy u lose and pusssy dey everywhere.

Lastly, avoid investing in trashy girls that are in survival mode (broke girls always needing money for something every time. It could range from sanitary pads, cheap snacks to phones, clothes, house rent etc). The more you spend, the more you begin to invest emotionally and when the lady swings from your branch to the branch of another guy whom she considers better than you like the typical street hustler, you get into bitter resentment of women - one that I have seen with a lot of Nigerian guys. In bitter resentment, you are still emotional and despite being out of your life, she still has power over your mind because of your emotional state.

Skepticus:
In the past, arranged marriages worked because women who were picked for marriages were often raised right, in closed conservative societies where their hypergamy was controlled with dire consequences, if she fell out of line. In the few cases, where it turned out bad was when the lady given out, was badly raised or super entitled ladies in marriages done solely for political and business connections.

To be clear, engaging with women in permanent living arrangement would involve some level of "simping" as you'll be expected to provide as a man to get sex, companionship and your bloodline passed on. Realistically, you can't always hold frame 100% of the time but at least, be smart enough to recover when you seem to be losing it.

Regarding arranged marriages, I can't say same for today, where modern women have been exposed to too much feminist ideas that promote freedoms over responsibilities. In my own opinion, I feel it work in some ways and some men are lucky especially when those who "vetted" her for you, did right This "vetting" can be very hard though. Today, a woman's past is hard to figure out and her potential as a good complementary partner for the future is equally hard. For a man, it's like buying goods in the dark. You don't know what you'll get - a risk. I've seen a good number (arranged marriages) turn out really bad with super damaged/unmarriageable women.

Martinez39s:
I have read skepticus's analyses so far up till this point. All I can is that when people refuse to learn or listen, just let them do what they please; if they learn the hard way, let them bear the burn and don't stress yourself comforting them. All we will give them is a sarcastic "sorry." That's my principle.

Some red-pill men think they are so special that they can find "quality women" (translation: a woman who is a nawalt as long as they play the alpha and hold frame). They think they are invincible or different or that what happened to others won't happen to them. I have seen one on this thread that believes no woman will cheat on redpiller; who knows how many more delusions are out there among our redpillers? Or how many believe these delusions? Some married men in gynocentric societies who have read the Rational Male wrongly think that they can put themselves in a marriage situation, where the wife has all the power, and still command her submission and flex their authority just because they are maintaining frame. Though we call women "fish brain", but they are not that stupid when they are manipulating and working in their best interest. Who are you that female nature should make an exception of you? There are territories and situations that even core redpillers avoid because they know female nature won't spare them.

Those that will learn will learn. I am sure that during Casillas's career, a lot of people would have pointed to his marriage and the kissing scene on TV as signs and evidence of good relationship with a good woman. They didn't know that things change with time and intentions usually reveal themselves with time. "Be a HVM and everything will workout with women" they say.... that's why £16,000-per-week Lovren's wife was cheating on him with a £200-per-month forestry worker.

Those that will learn will learn; those that stubborn, filled with hubris, and delusional are playing with fire. Except they become victims of blissful ignorance till death, they are in for a big shock and regret. Notice that Casillas's wife was intentional in her ways and started divorce proceedings after Casillas passed his earning peaks so that she could cash out; the fact that a woman is stroking your ego by giving the illusion that are you in control and you are an alpha doesn't mean she is not planning the divorce and doing her calculations.

Skepticus:
The quote is the foundation on what a healthy traditionally-conservative relationship/marriage is built on.

A man should be firm in leadership when it comes to relationship with his complementary but submissive partner. When the man fails in this, by not providing adequate leadership in the relationship, letting his woman get away with bad behaviours, or letting her indulge in pleasures and freedom over responsibility in the name of being "woke" or "liberal", he sets himself up for disrespect and even, marital failure.

A woman who can't be submissive to the sensible leadership that a man brings, radiating masculine vibes (lacks feminity) or being exposed to post-modernist liberal and feministic ideas (which is "knowing far too much " ) is "chaotic" and most likely, be a disaster in permanent relationship with a man who seeks a complementary, submissive partner.

Skepticus:
You don't understand the "effect" of the "drug" that "attention" means to ladies. Even, aging don't affect it that much (some grandmas still use make up/filters to appear younger).

"Attention" has the same "currency value" as money to women but the truth is that, this "currency value" means that you'll be "relegated" to the "friendzone" level like the tons of other beta simps/orbiters around her. The "simp/orbiters" who would get a "taste" of her would have to have "simping value" as "wealthy providers" on the short term (packaged prostitution disguised as dating,) or in the long term (as marriage or cohabitation). The dudes getting her coochie for free or "close" to free is probably not in the list of those giving her these compliments. They may even, be tired of her already wishing that some simp take her away quick.

Knowing what your "value" is to every woman in your life who has no blood relationship to you is very important.

Skepticus:
Wahala for men who dey carry love, dating and marriage for head.

Once, your woman has been sexually imprinted by another man over you, it's just a matter of time before he seeks this man (or men).

Women fûck men they are sexually attracted to and marry who can provide. Men would often marry women they are sexually attracted to. Most times, the women don't feel same about them - recipe for later problems in marriages.

One of the reasons I advice men to deal strictly with women they sexually imprint or women who find them sexually-attractive over those who see them as just "providers" (image of the typical middle class/wealthy family man).

Though, it's not entirely fool proof. A hoe will still cheat but it reduces the chances of headaches for the man and paternal fraud.

Skepticus:
36 year old dude married my youngest sister who was 21, some years back in her 3rd year in a State University. The dude, who was financially well-off was willing to spend his life just to wife her (and he did). I struggled to understand his obsession with my younger sister at the time, till he told me (some days before the wedding ceremony) that she met her a virgin - a rare treasure among Nigerian ladies. His parents (my in laws) are always in contact with (and serving) my parents. It's crazy. Meanwhile, my other sister who rode the carousel didn't settle for the "best" of man in marriage. She didn't tell me directly but you could tell from close observation of her family life that she is just "managing" the loser who saved her.

ubunja:
"invest that money on yourself"

That's all there is to it really.

The difference between Alphas and Betas is how they spend their money.

How does a Beta get girls that are top class? By spending on them to impress them. The WRONG WAY OF DOING THINGS.

How does an Alpha get girls that are top class? Here is how:
An Alpha DOES NOT spend time, energy and money on these girls to impress them, instead he spends all that money ON HIMSELF. Why? -----------------> To improve himself to where he impresses those girls without giving them money.

Two totally different approaches with two totally different outcomes. Betas pay, Alphas get it free.

Don't spend on a woman to impress her, spend on yourself to improve yourself so you impress her without spending on her. That is what is meant by the popular Red Pill statement, "Invest In Yourself". You should always invest in yourself. That way if a girl turns you down, you'll not have lost an investment. Because all the spending was done on YOU. That's the Alpha way.


------------------------------------
actually this is from a Miseducation I wrote months ago but can't post because some assholes on this platform are busy plagiarizing those articles and putting them on Amazon as ebooks. What the hell is wrong with some of you? Those writeups are FREE for you to learn not to sell. Idiots.

Martinez39s:
Exactly! Either a virgin with good manners or no marriage at all till. Used up hoès with high or low body count and supposed utmost femininity and good manners should get out of the way. Let's learn to create high standards that do not yield to any perceived scarcity or lack of options.

Those who are overwhelmed by the feeling of starting their own family and propagating their genes (continuing family name and legacy) will likely rush in, lower the standard and manage the non-virgin hoe he gets as long he gets to build his family and propagate his gene. They don't want to miss out on this "must have" or big achievement. Nature can be funny at times.

Skepticus:
It's the same in other regions of the country. Old traditions, in some parts of the south west (as I'm aware), older women were always there to confirm the virginity of a fully betrothed female. Where it was confirmed that she was not a virgin, she was returned back to her father's house and her family ridiculed. Now, you have teenage girls popping out babies for men who are not responsible while waiting (when older) for guys who have hustled hard to get their shiit together (Dual Mating Strategy). The ones who don't have babies have multiple abortions. I won't blame anyone on this as there are a lot to blame (that's a talk for another day). Women are adapting to their new freedoms, I'm adapting equally. Others can do what they "wish" about it and I'm in full support if it is, for the benefit of men.

Skepticus:
The advice given by these gold-diggers to manipulate men in the red pill/MGTOW is something that you are deeply aware of (being an OG here). However, those reading stuffs here are at different level of the red pill and MGTOW. Some who have swallowed the red pill are a few inches away, into going back to worshipping pussies over their lives. Some here may not be interested in all we say. They just get the temporary kick off being in an all-male thread discussing about issues mostly related to women. As soon as they are off this thread, they go back to dissing those in the red pill and wallowing in their blue-pilled state. Some here, (I'm aware) are on a deeper level as monks. No interest in impressing/gaming women, and the society. They just want to make their money, enjoy their lives and be left alone.

In typical gold-digging fashion, the advises (targeting rich guys who show their "red pilledness) have ranged from playing feminine and submissive (Chameleon), never give sex easily (acting chaste) while having an appearance that messes with his sexual imaginations (implied sex, knowing that men have a weakness for sex). Don't ask him for cash (it cheapens her game. Only cheap prostitutes do that), rather project his spendings into business/investments. This appeals to his ego and he starts to commit gradually without knowing while she makes her moves on the low.

For the rich ones going their own way, use shaming tactics like " gay-shaming" "stingy-shaming" into pricking his ego. In trying to prove you wrong, he spends. For those who appear to be monks or dilly-dallying with women, abort mission - wrong target.

Skepticus:
Women fûck men who they are sexually attracted to, but marry men who can provide - Red Pilled Realists. Women are the "chosers" for a reason.

Men are the opposite. Most of the time, they marry women they are sexually attracted to, over women who chose and "love" them.

Make I offend "lover boys" wey go read dis comment small. Some of the men wey go attend dat ur big lavish wedding with d love of ur life don bang ya fiancee taya and might still bang it after u are wedded (They may even be sponsoring your wedding disguised as gifts or donations from fiancee's friends or family). They are just there to see the loser "LAWMA" guy packing their trash (Not discouraging anyone from marrying though). Just making you see the reality on ground). #InsideLife

Skepticus:
The "Desperate for your commitment" part reminds me to inform men (who care to read/listen) that men who are on their purpose or indifferent to women and are getting choosing signals (Green Light) from women should be highly observant and try to understand the deep underlying reasons why women are choosing them.

Most men who are on their purpose, bettering themselves (making money, building status etc) give off "provider" vibes which attracts mostly women who are there to enjoy the "provision", not the man or his essence. In fact, most choosing signals (Green Light) from women are manipulative. Only a few, are genuine.

Like I said in some of my past comments on this thread, nothing bad in making your money or improving your status to attract women to you (though, there is a large segment of men who encourage minimalism/less flashiness or show off, when it comes to the red pill and it helps in sieving out manipulative gold diggers from "seriously-interested" women) but it is WISDOM to get what you want from her (especially if she is there to Gold Dig or giving Manipulative Green Lights) spending little or nothing. If you have to spend so much (Expensive Pusssy), you are in a transactional relationship/marriage (Packaged Prostitution) "overpaying" a pusssy that some other guy is getting for less or nothing. You might be better off wanking, going to a brothel or ordering for pusssy on tinder or instamessage in a more "realistic" deal. Not encouraging picking prostitutes or masturbation, though they serve a purpose. Nothing beats sexual control and discipline for a man.

Niggas, make una dey use una head above una dicks. #Focus

Martinez39s:
NB: this post is my opinion. Feel free to counter logically. I stand to be corrected.

@Emboldened text
Well, some people believe gynocentrism cannot come into Nigeria because of men in power and the Islamic North. A lot of men, even most in the North and those you think are patriarchs, are actually simps. Also, the North is not the only part of Nigeria; even if the North doesn't yield to gynocentrism, can't we have a case where other parts are gynocentric except the North? Even when that happens, educated Northern women (eg. Aisha Yesufu) will subtly collude with women from the South to push "equality" and gynocentrism. Mind you that generation by generation, Muslim men are becoming soft and simpish, especially the educated ones in urban areas; it's only a matter of time. Do women like Aisha Yesufu look like traditional submissive women to you despite their hijab and whatever? She is even a feminist, a Muslim feminist, let that sink in. Does her husband look like the domineering, Islamic, alpha patriarch some aspiring patriarch here wetdream to become? Where is the power of Islam in the face of gynocentrism and already-embraced western influence? Many muslims, especially educated ones, are even being moderate muslims if not leaving Islam or being nominal muslims. It's so bad that you have muslims who are feminists or support "equality," and the rise of muslim women who are demanding that their husbands remain married to only them and not get other wives.

Factors, which I will not explain, that ushers a society into gynocentrism
(1) A safe and comfortable time.
(2) A simp culture and the majority of men being simps.
(3) "Equality" in the constitution and the participation of women in positions of power and lawmaking.
(4) Lack of a manly fathers/strong masculine figures in the lives of children, especially boys. Your mother, female guardians, simp fathers/guardians, will raise little boys to be simps.

Some redpillers might call me a misogynist, but if you encourage women to take up positions of power, become judges/lawyers, decide laws, and even vote, you have no ground to complain about gynocentrism and the propagation of the female agenda. You know fully well, as redpiller, that the females in these positions carry their female nature with them and will always work in accordance with the female agenda. With females (about half of the population) being allowed to influence laws, and majority of men (simps) on the side of the female agenda, gynocentrism is sure to run its course; it's only a matter of time.

I remember, few years back, on nairaland, when I conversed with a female nairalander (ladyçewhy, I think). She, a staunch feminist, played the victim and complained that Nigerian women are suffering and are shortchanged. I pointed out the error in this, and I asked her what the solution would be to her supposed problem. She said the family laws in western countries would be the solution in order to protect women. I kid you not. Even some Nigerian women are aware of the laws over there and they fully support it.

Those who marry now in Nigeria or western men who move to conservative terrains don't know how the existing laws will change in ten, fifteen or twenty year's time; you never can tell when or how it will change. Note that even if you marry before these laws, your marriage and divorce will be subject to the newly passed gynocentric laws once they are passed. This happened to traditional American men who got married in the 40s - 60s only for their virgin conservative wives to take advantage of the new marital, child support, and domestic violence laws that feminists fought for in the 70s and 80s (these are the traditionally nurtured and supposed well-bred wives of the 40s, 50s, and 60s, whom are esteemed by the media and others as the archetypal submissive and traditional wives). Some of these wives even became feminists in the 70s and 80s, to the chagrin of their husbands, most of whom fought in world war. AWALT. (They were submissive and traditional because of the world wars, and they couldn't dare venture feminist talking points. They allowed men go to war while they played the traditional women until things became safe).

Finally, I acknowledge that Islam got a lot things right about women and it's the most red-pill religion among its abrahamic contemporaries. However, Islam isn't just about the red pill, it is way more than that, and it needs a lot of reforms in order to make it compatible with basic human rights, especially freedom of speech and expression, and technological advancements. Also, instituting Islam for the sake of putting women in check and establishing patriarchy in every facet of life will face many challenges: do most people believe in Allah and are they willing to thread the core Islamic path in an age where we know so much? NO! If that's the case and an Islamic caliphate is established, a rebellion will quickly abolish the caliphate or a massive bloodshed and force by muslims will be required to keep the caliphate alive. We already know that an apostate or critic of Muhammad will be killed in an Islamic caliphate, and most people abhor honor killings and a lot more in Islam. Also, a theocracy is as strong as the number of those who earnestly embrace the necessary beliefs and practices of the required religion. It also doesn't help that there is a reason why people flee Islamic countries and come to the west. If you are willing to trade your freedom and rights because you want to put "hoès in check", that's your business; Islam doesn't put only women in check, it also put men in check as well. Perhaps, one can create a system based of (Islamic) red-pill principles and infuse it with secularism and freedom of speech and expression; that's not my headache.

From the onset till now, I accept that patriarchy is good for both genders, but in a time like this where the SOCIAL pillars ancient men had to enforce and protect their masculinity is almost nonexistent, the patriarchy that men of old had shall somewhat remain an unattainable ideal of the modern man.

Martinez39s:
Gbam! Even if Bill Gates wasn't a simp, he held masculine frame and Melinda Gates was a virgin at time of marriage, or at first acquaintance, the outcome wouldn't be different. It's similar to the cases of western men and abroad-based African men who bring over virgin women they deem traditional and feminine from African, Thailand, Latin America and other supposed conservative societies, only for these women to acquaint themselves with and assimilate into the system and gradually reveal the inner beast and feminist on the inside. For these men, they realise first-hand that western culture and western women are not just the problem, it's an AWALT problem that becomes apparent when women are legally and socially given the ample leverage and lattitude to act as they like with impunity; western culture, precisely its liberal outlook and gynocentrism, provide these.

Even Rollo Tomassi followers and that of red-pill dating/game coachs go into the marriage situation erroneously thinking they can just hold frame and run game on their wives and everything will be alright, only for the court and female nature to give them a rude awakening; divorce courts don't care about your frame or red-pill knowledge, once you are in their trap, they will crush you even if your red-pill frame is made of adamantium.

African American men who have only been with African American women think black women are this and that and they branch off to Latinas and white women only to realise AWALT is the case; I can grant these men that African American women have issues peculiar to them, but that's a discussion for another day. Similarly, many Nigerian men who have only been in this country and haven't tasted non-Nigerian girls erroneously think the problem is just Nigerian girls hence them become #TeamForeignGirls.

In the West and other gynocentric societies, nothing can help a man in the marriage situation. It doesn't matter if he is a redpiller with steel masculine frame or if he is the most disappointing simp, the divorce court will crush him nonetheless; I even discussed how marriage will likely erode your frame automatically, especially when kids start getting involved, but that's for another day. Most men, rich or poor, need to have the humility to know that they are nothing special to female nature: we are all just another expendable utility to female nature, and a female will never prioritize a man above her desires and wants.
• It's funny how one will think that a married woman in a gynocentric society will forgo the opportunity to take half the (millionaire/billionaire) husband's net worth after his earning peak or ten-year mark... just because he is a redpiller and held masculine frame. Even a virgin wife won't act differently. Being a husband means you were selected as provider of resources, not a fùck boy, and you will forever be treated accordingly; it may even turn out that despite your game and frame, she was never sexually attracted to you. Why should you be treated differently by female nature?
• What about those who believe that a woman can't cheat on a redpiller?

We men quickly forget that just as we have the red-pill and game for us, women have their own game and manipulation which they have sharpened and have been practicing since childhood; to make things worse, these are deeply rooted in their nature so they are good, efficient and unrelenting at them than us. Also, we men don't know it all as far as the red pill is concerned: red pill is vast and we learn new red pills every day; you might be surprised that while you think you have everything figured out, you actually know so little and not enough. I believe it's safe to say that no man knows it all when it comes to female nature even if they know so much; we must have the humility to learn endlessly till death.

Some men think they have it all figured out from the little they've read on red-pill forums/blogs and watched on YouTube and movies and they develop a hubris, ego and sense of invincibility that will eventually be their downfall. Most times, just when most men think they are the alpha predators in control, it turns that it was the woman being the calculating predator all along. The solution is to humble yourself, continuously meditate on red-pill truths you know and their corollaries so you don't forget them or slip away, and never assume you have it all figured out: there is always more to learn and red pill can never be exhausted, so keep learning.