₦airaland Forum

Pidgin2:
Honestly, all I see here is ignorance on your part and nothing else

baby do you see ignorance in me too?

hopefulLandlord:
truckload of sense!

nice one!!!

you can never see KEB and his ass licking, peter griffin esque sidekick having sense like this

.

KingEbukasBlog:
People who were against religious worship of the gods were called atheists . The deists were even called atheists because they were against the worship of the gods . Diagoras existed before Socrates . . I remember saying sometime that atheism was actually seen as the rejection of personal gods . But the belief there is no god started with Diagoras .

you lying Bleep!
Diagoras didn't believe in the Greek gods
It was unclear if he was atheistic about every other deity

proudafrogal:
there were records of irreligion in China as early as 1076Bc

don't mind him!
Even Socrates was accused of being an athiest
The fact that there were no recorded atheists before that time doesn't mean there weren't any

KingEbukasBlog:
Why would I even date a female atheist ?

you'd be surprised
I'm sure there are a lot of atheists in your school

KingEbukasBlog:


I'm serious bro . Read my latest comment to Jonbellion . Try to see my point . We have derailed this thread enough .

yes?

KingEbukasBlog:
There were prophetesses , female judges , warriors and leaders in ancient Israel as far back as the 12th century BC . While America still can't get a female president in 2017 . Women's suffrage began in the late 19th century .

Female atheists are a joke .

lool I just made this comment

this boy
An athiest must have broken your heart
Take heart man

I rest my case

KingEbukasBlog:
The Greeks had recorded history hundreds of years before Diagoras lived . The Chinese , the Indians also had records of history . Even Egypt has records of history as far back as the 15th century BC . Since all the areas where knowledge had grown had no record of the practice of that pathetic foolishness , isn't it obvious that there was none before Diagoras ?

this boy
An athiest must have broken your heart
Take heart man

KingEbukasBlog:
Atheism began with Diagoras of Melos 2,500 years ago before the hedonistic Charvaka atheist materialist school made it popular around the second century BC . Can you provide any historical figure or nation that practiced atheism prior to the time of Diagoras ?

Why do you think Modern Atheists have been told that atheism didn't begin with the Age of Enlightenment ?

You are an atheist who does not know how this pathetic foolishness began ? Now that's hilarious !

you of all people should know that if he was the first recorded athiest would actually not make him the first athiest.c'mon why stoop this low man

CoolUsername:
Ok, what if he only uses furry tentacle alien hentai?

Edit: But seriously though, is there any situation that it would be ok?

chaii this boy you've gone in way too deep
I first saw that in family guy

Because they are waking up and seeing religion for what it truly is

NwaAmaikpe:
It is a shame how young girls hop from one man to another with no dignity and flaunt their flagrant disregard for sexual chastity.


Victor Anichebe has not gotten over the heartbreak of relegation neither has he successfully cured the Candidiasis her sister gave him (that's why he visited the village for herbs by the way)

Now this one is unto this Sakawa boy Mr Eazi...


At this young age, her bodycount is more than the number of tracks on DBanj's new album.

shut up
Ode

The religion of piss has started again

Don't forget they will accuse you of loving the things of the world and worshipping worldly things but they can roll in the mud, eat raw grass and drink petrol for their pastor Gods

spacetacular:
You are wrong sir.
Do all snakes look alike, do they all move the same way? Do they all feed the same way? Do they all kill the same way? If your answer to those questions are all no then ask yourself why they have no specific pattern of similarity despite all being snakes?

Do all insects look alike? Do they all fly or do they all walk on the ground? The ones that fly can they perform the function of the ones that walk and vice versa? How and why did they "choose" to take on specific roles in nature despite all being insects?

Do all fishes look alike? Do they all breed the same way or swim the same? Do they all feed the same way ? Why not?

Do all humans look alike? Do we have twins who are 100% identical " on the outside" yet still unique in the DNA composition? Why?
Do all twins think alike and have equal levels of intelligence? If no, why?

Do all monkeys look alike? Are they all the same size and colour and structure? Do they all make the same sounds and share mannerisms? Why not?

Similarity does not alter purpose. A glass mirror and a shiny steel surface both reflect images very well yet both do not share the same purpose.

Shoes and slippers are for the feet yet are not interchangeable.

The nose and mouth share a function (breathing) yet do not serve the same purpose.

Why do all children not grow up to become footballers or scientists? Why do children at such early ages able to identify their passion and the things they love? Why does going to school not guarantee one of being a genius while so many drop outs became geniuses Afterall we are supposedly all similar so why do we all serve different purposes?

Why do you not reason like every member of your family? Do you all reason alike? Why not?

I deliberately said all I did above to cause your mind to be triggered into doing some proper thinking and not what you have been spoon fed into believing about evolution and genetics. There are too too too many gaps in genetics that voids it.

you have completely missed the point!
Specific types of similarity that proves common descent is what I said.For instance, many proteins can have different amino acid sequences without this affecting the way they fold and hence what they do. However, species thought to be more closely related by common descent have sequences more like each other than they do with species that are more distantly related. Why would a common designer make it look like it "evolved" rather than was created?.The theory of evolution depends on similarities. The theory of evolution predicts that species branch off from common ancestors but because this occurs through a slow gradual process, we should observe a vast number of similar traits both genetically and anatomically which we do!
Evolution is a fact okay. Intelligent design is pseudoscientific bullshit. It can't be tested because it doesn't rely on evidence. It just goes for the easy way out without even asking why the designer would even bother using the same materials to make every animal when it can simply create extremely different forms of life that would make evolution impossible to prove. If the earth is even only thousands of years old evolution couldn't even occur and there is no evidence from that expect you want to ignore it all and stick your head in books like the bible, Koran, torah etc- books that know nothing about anything and depict the utmost peak of human ignorance and stupidity. If you want to disprove evolution then follow the scientific method exactly, providing objective, verifiable evidence that withstands repeated peer review showing that all aspects of evolution currently supported by two centuries' worth of evidence are false and get your Nobel prize

Good luck with that

sniperwolf:
This one has no story or the story did not just connect

that game eh
The AI is so annoying

The last of us!
Assassins creed too. When it was still cool
Now it's just repetitive bulshit

How can any rational person say Islamic terrorism does not exist
In a country with sharia the penalty for stealing is amputation
Women are treated like second class citizens and objects (same with Christianity tho) and basically every offence is the death penalty
Please let one muslim come and say we are taking it out of context
Religion of pisspeace

THE MUMU CHRISTIAN
Jumps to make false, inaccurate and hasty generalisations on unbelievers

KingEbukasBlog:
Nailed it

fool
The evidence of common descent is not about mere similarity, but rather a very specific pattern of similarity. if they were all specially created for some particular purpose, there's no reason any of them would be similar.

KingEbukasBlog:
This is all you do . You can't do better than this

lmao you dey mad

KingEbukasBlog:
This is all you do . You can't do better than this

lmao you dey mad

felixomor:
Apes and humans dont share common ancestor.
As a matter of fact, many scientists disagree.

Humans share similar DNA with banana and tobacco.
By your logic, maybe we also share similar ancestors to tobacco.

Besides, its only the proteinous part of DNA that even share similarly.
And the proteinous part is not up to 10% of DNA itself.

Your logic is dead on arrival.

oga all life are earth is related but plant life is a lot farther in the evolutionary tree
What is your point here now

Lol
This foolish thread again
KingEbukasBlog whenever he remembers how his threads are always ripped to shreds

Correct slowpoke

KingEbukasBlog:
They'll end up in Heaven and you'll end up in Hell .

Your relationship with sonofluc1fer's dad is the useless relationship .

are you not going to pick cotton for your slave master in heaven forever

Billyonaire:
It is still possible to have a personal relationship with Christ Consciousness yet hold diverse views. The Ego construct which we identify with, as self is a product of our unique experiences with the environment, diverse cultures, mishaps, etc etc; Although connected to the same Source Field their messages are altered by their ego.

huh

hopefulLandlord:
please humour me by showing which part is "salty" or I'll give you some chips to go with the salts you're holding

your sister sounds hot man

Hmmmm
Dem go soon start now!
Religion of piss peace

Deicide:
Which people? oh you thought i was a muslim

lool
From frying pan to fire