₦airaland Forum

Guyman01:
The guy is anti transgender making them to know that even if you create fake Pussy for a man who decides to live like a woman you can't give her ovaries and eggs neither can a woman with artificial dck grow balls.
They have been after him because he is making western ladies to start respecting and cherishing masculinity once again and he's telling men to defend women who recognise the place of natural man in the society.
He is making nonsense of their woke ideology and they have been after him.

He said recently that if feminists want to defend the rights of women they should join the Army and ask to be deployed to Afghanistan to fight against Taliban which is denying women of rights to education and not talking down on men who go to wars started by Hillary Clinton in Libya

blueAgent:
Di you mean in yoruba culture and land, their are no divorces?

blueAgent:
You have no indepth knowledge of African culture and religion, if you have you would not be writing this naive comment you are writing here.

Mind you, the West did not enforce their culture or religion, it was the attraction and benefits of their culture and religion that encouraged our ppl to abandon most of our culture and religion to adopt that of the west.

blueAgent:
My friend close your mouth, if you have nothing factual to say.

Which Africa had sophiscated marriage and religion?

Kingcalls:
Out of the 14 about 12 or 13 were filed by the women.... this is the reason y I don't blame the talibans.... men build society, women destroy it

Angelfrost:
Your opinion is well noted sir, but no where close to fact!

Fact check: This is a dynamic and ever changing world with cultures changing with the times... It has been this way since time immemorial.

Even the culture you were born into was a different version of your parents'.

Modernity is relative and progressive!

Thanks for stopping by.

Angelfrost:
African women endured marital abuse, stigmatization, domestic violence, etc!

Please read! Let's not squabble over historical facts!

I never said I believed in happily ever after nor bought any European culture of divorce... The reality of today's life can't have men and women enduring marriages sir.

Even beyond marriage, cultures have changed world over... That's life!

Some people even choose celibacy and single parenthood nowadays... This would be unheard of back then, not just Nigeria but Europe and America.

Angelfrost:
Actually, there is clear evidence that those past marriages of our fathers were not all happy or rosy.

They didn't divorce not because they were satisfied or prepared to stick it out... They stayed because they were being compelled by a harsh culture to keep up appearances.

Marriage is not for everyone! Know this and know peace!

Let's not keep deceiving ourselves hiding under ancient cultures.

Kobojunkie:
1. WOW!
2. CHEEZUSSSSS!
3. Aye!!

Well, just so you know, the Law has declared marriage abandonment, which it admits is typical in Nigeria, a criminal offense!
https://www.nairaland.com/7492801/abandon-spouse-go-jail-three#119359476

Kobojunkie:
So, it means nothing to you that the many children abandoned in these situations are left handicapped in society by these criminal acts?

Kobojunkie:
1. WOW!
2. CHEEZUSSSSS!
3. Aye!!

Well, just so you know? The Law has declared marriage abandonment, which it admits is typical in Nigeria, a criminal offense!
https://www.nairaland.com/7492801/abandon-spouse-go-jail-three#119359476

Kobojunkie:
1. Abandonment can be like separation, you say. And how long is this separation meant to be for — 1 year, 2? 10? 20, life?

2. So what? This here is a discussion about marriage abandonment in Nigeria vs divorce in same Nigeria.

3. Divorce is a problem in the marriage institution... is marriage abandonment not equally a problem in the marriage institution?

Kobojunkie:
1. You haven't been paying attention since the beginning of this conversation have you because this response of yours here reveals you have been arguing blindly.

Marriage Abandonments, which were condoned by your ancestors, and excused by you as simply an approach to the resolution of disputes, went and still go largely unreported and recorded as divorce. Your claims up till now that the divorce rate(official) is higher today than it was back say 80 years ago is not itself based on fact but based on a shift in your reasoning that the reality of abandonment is indeed no different from divorce. Again, the official Divorce rate, remains at the same rate, less than 1%, which is the same as it was back about 40 years ago, so what has changed? Nothing, except now you perceive the culture of marriage abandonment for what it is, divorce.

2. Go back to my statement and read with your eyes wide open. The story I told was of Nigeria in the 80s when the population was less than 25% of what it is today. Those divorces mentioned were not official but abandonments. Compare the differences in population counts and you will maybe wise up to the reason why it has gotten harder to ignore the issue of marriage abandonment and now see it for what it is which is divorce.

3. Am I to assume at this point that you also failed mathematics in secondary school or something? Aren't you the very same person who pointed out in #1 above that the information I posted indicated that the official divorce rate remains below 1% in Nigeria?

Essentially, you have been trying to talk out of both sides of your mouth here — claiming marriage abandonment is not the same as divorce yet at the same time acknowledging that the high marriage abandonment rate you observe today in the Nigerian society is nothing but divorce, though the practice goes on unreported. You need to sort this thing out with your psyche there.

Kobojunkie:
You mean in addition to the already high marriage abandonment —the culturally accepted practice of divorce that allows men the right to send wives back to their parents as if unwanted slaves — rates from the times of your ancestors and ancestors before them?

CaveAdullam:
I disagree.

1. Of course, women love money. They need it for their wants and needs. Women's need for money is material. They want money to feel safe.

In the land of poor men, women will still get engaged to the least poor man. What she wants are security and protection. Nothing more. Nothing else.

2. Man's desire for money is both material and transcendental.

Material: to provide for his wants and needs.

Transcendental: power, status, control, and authority.

3. If a woman makes enough money she desires to have the latest fashion and tour the world.

If a man makes enough money he begins to think of kingship or politics. He knows that after money, there's another level: power. To have money and power is to subdue the earth. The first to grab that power is the king among men.

4. Why do men conquer territories and not women? Why are men of the highest innovators and inventors?

If men don't love money why do they keep pushing forward?

5. Women can be without value, not men. And what shapes that value: money. Money is not all of it, but a core.

6. Men kill for money, not women.

Men do the most obscene and menial acts just for money.

Men go to the extreme just for money.

You can't even compare men's desires for money with women. They are far off. Women may explore their sexual drive for money, however, sex is natural and not extreme, and that's the farthest they go. Ditto for men; men will climb higher for money after sex has been granted.

7. Men feel worthless without money. Same with how society views men.

With or without money, women are given a free pass. By the way, men want to be richer than their spouses, and their spouses want it so.

DAY 352, REDPILL 2022

Authority: Be valuable.

ubunja:
it's generally IMPOSSIBLE for a man to love more than 1 woman at a time. Women can do it better. Men can do it but that's a very small minority of men who can master that art. The general dynamic is that man can love only one woman at a time. While he can very well sleep with many women at the same time unaffected. To demonstrate the differences between the genders:
Men can love 1 woman at a time but can sleep with many at a time.
Women can love many men at a time but can sleep with 1 man at a time.
The implications of this dynamic are massive. And it's the difference between sexual cheating and emotional cheating.

A relationship/marriage is not threatened when a man is sleeping around, it's when he starts confiding with one woman and having heart to heart talks with one female and bonding emotionally with her that his official GF/ wife has to worry. Cause that's where the real threat is - since emotionally men can handle only one woman at a time. Him getting Emotional with a woman who's not his own wife is a much bigger risk to the relationship/marriage than him just having random sexual encounters. The random sexual encounters don't mean anything to men cause sex in itself is not an emotional experience for men. But if a man is not even sleeping with a woman but is spending time bonding emotionally with her the damage to his own relationship/marriage will be far greater than if he just slept with the woman and kept his mouth shut and heart out of it.

Men can not be affected on an emotional level by sex. No matter how sweet and delicious a pucc is, it will never be enough to push a man to break up with his GF or wife over it. No matter how good of a fuccer a side chick is, a man will never leave his GF/wife for the side chick. Men will enjoy that sweet pucc for what it is and still go back to the woman they love........ But let a side chick be gentle, sweet, caring, loving, kind, understanding, forgiving, respectful, submissive then there's a problem! Here is where a man's relationship is at risk. Cause now he's being affected on an emotional level. This is where the situation becomes dangerous. And the moment a man engages with a woman on this level, his own GF/wife will sense it right away. She'll literally feel her man's love for her drop and reduce. This is when the man will suddenly be cold and distant with his GF or wife. He'll suddenly be moody at home and start fault-finding and being irritable around his main woman. Cause his heart can only deal with one woman at a time. He has a problem spreading his love over two women. So as he falls deeper for that other woman, his main woman feels it. This is how men get caught when they start cheating, especially since k. men can only cheat with one woman at a time so in the end they end up being Emotional with her. True players always cheat with multiple women and they hit it and keep it moving so they never get invested in any one of the women. Or even if the Players do get somewhat emotionally invested, the Emotional dividend each woman gets is too small to really matter. But if all the Emotional investment is going to just one side chick then there's a problem cause that one side chick is now a real threat.

For women its the opposite.
A woman can be romantically involved with even up to 5 men and none of the men will ever sense it. There'll be no diminishing of love for one man as it all flows to the other men. Generally a man will not sense anything. That's why women are always chatting with strange men in their DMs who are promising her heaven and earth and doing her all acts of kindness and love but she'll be in a fully fledged relationship or marriage all the time. And her husband not feel a thing. However the moment she fuccs another man her BF or husband will sense it. Cause the way a woman moves around her BF and husband after another man has rearranged her guts and fucced her brains out will always be different. There's bound to be a reduction in respect, awe, understanding, kindness and submission inside the relationship and marriage. Many men can sense it, cause their gut feeling is finely tuned to pick these things up. Even without evidence. There's always a change. Even though a man can't quite put his finger on it but he'll know something's up. Most men just won't speak up or do anything cause of the lack of evidence. But in their heart and soul they're picking up the vibe that their woman is riding another dicc. But that vibe won't be there if it's merely the woman bonding emotionally with other dudes in DMs or at work etc.

The opposite for women being that for women their system is optimised to watch out for Emotional cheating,, while a man's system is optimised to watch out for sexual cheating. A woman's sexual cheating endangers a man's legacy far more than Emotional cheating cause if his woman is sleeping around, while she may end up leaving him, the greatest danger is that she may cheat and stay, thereby making it possible for the man to raise another man's offspring. Which is the greatest of betrayals. Meanwhile a man's Emotional Cheating endangers a woman's security cause where a man's heart goes his money will soon follow.

Hence a man who discovers his wife been messing with another man will ask only one question: "did you have sex with him?". Cause to men cheating is not really cheating until the legs open. This is why even to men, a relationship is not really a relationship until the woman's legs open.

Meanwhile to women, if a GF/wife discovers her man has been cheating, what does she ask? Does she ask if her man has slept with that woman? Nope! A GF/Wife's pressing question is always: "Do you love that woman?" Because women understand until you get a man to open his heart you have not got got him. This is why even to women, a relationship is not really a relationship until the man's heart opens. This is all to say a woman will forgive easier real sex but will struggle to forgive emotional cheating.

To better explain this concept...
If your GF discovers that you fucced Maria she may forgive you. But if she discovers you sat down with Maria and shared with her a bond, whereby you were so deep in it that you shared with Maria your life struggles, your life pains, your successes and failures, your hopes and dreams, your anxieties and worries --- this will hurt your GF far more than if you had just fucced Maria and kept it going. Cause see, now you've engaged with Maria on an EMOTIONAL LEVEL.
That level of engagement is only for your main GF.

And the moment you give it to another someone, your GF will sense it immediately. Cause that's the part where your Emotions for your GF will start dropping cause another someone is also getting those Emotions as well. That's the cheating that hurts a woman beyond imagination. The Emotional investment via sharing. Cause that part of you is as important to her as her own puccy is important to you. And no woman wants to share that with anybody else. She wants that deeper knowledge about you to remain exclusive only to her. This is what the first Pic below is about. See Pic 1.
The sharing of deep information must not be done lightly. Cause that deep information is the real you, it is your core, that every woman must work to decipher. You never give it to any woman on a silver platter. When a woman asks you "tell me about yourself", always be vague about your core. Don't straight up dish it out. While you continue to relentlessly diick her down and rearrange her guts, refuse to lay bare to her your dreams and aspirations, your fears and anxieties, your triumphs and losses, your joys and sorrows, your pains and pleasures,,, make her work for it. Your dicc must be easy to get, but your core must be hard to get. It is by controlling this aspect of yourself that you remain Emotionally Unavailable (read: interesting and high value)

A woman must forever be pressed to understand the man who's fuccing her brains out. Keep feeding her crumbs of information to keep her keen. But never the full gourmet. She must always be working to understand you. Remember INFORMATION IS POWER.

That's why women love gossip. While men only have to sleep with a woman and they'll know about her. A man can understand decades about a woman just by one round of sex with her. It's why in the Bible when it talks about a man having sex with a woman it says "...and so and so KNEW his wife", - sex was equated with knowledge. A woman has to study a man and have him expose himself but a man only has to spend a night with a woman and he'll know just what type of woman she has been. Cause a woman's body will always betray her history. That's why women are fighting tooth and nail to have men ignore the state of a woman's body and to never associate how a woman's body is with her sexual history: hence all the talk about "boys don't sag boobs, it's gravity and genes" and "promiscuity don't loosen the vagina". All of which is a lie. A woman's body is the scene of her crimes. And she carries that scene everywhere she goes.

No man wants a woman who has no self control, just as no woman wants a man who has no self control.
But in intergender dynamics self control means different things to different genders: A man has self control if he can fucc without falling in love and a woman has self control if she can love without fuccing. That is why a high body count on a woman is a bad thing cause it betrays a lack of self control. But Feminists sell the idea of a high body count to women as representing sexual freedom and liberty. Which of course women enthusiastically buy into. Cause they need every excuse to whóré. Cause let's face it, sex is nice. And by extension whóring is nice. Which in itself wouldn't be a problem except that women are prone to falling in love via sex and if they have too much sex they end up losing the ability to fall in love via sex, which means sex stops being a bonding experience for them,which further devalues sex to a point that women don't really care who they have it with and where and how. At that level a woman is no longer of any use for a man and has become toxic and is just one step away from finding more joy in diildos and vibrators than real one on one sex with a man. This is the reason why diildos and vibrators are becoming more and more popular as women whóré more and more cause what is happening is that these women are hitting the sex "ceiling" more and more: they're quickly reaching that space where they've fucced too many men the sex has lost its magic and is no longer satisfying. They now need more. A lot of women have reached this level in the West and are now Surviving on toys. Their condition may as well be incurable and hopeless.

Caveat: This "Men can fucc many but can only love 1 and Women can love many but can only fucc 1" dynamic doesn't however hold true when a man and a woman are single.
A single woman is much better able to push multiple sexual setups than a woman in a relationship. Hence for women being single = whóring. And it's the reason why women are easily sold the idea of being single. Cause women can tolerate NO LOVE if they're getting all the sex they want. And they can even tolerate NO BABIES if they're getting good neverending sex. Which brings us to that shocking American statistic that close to 50% of all women will be single and childless by 2030. Which is the single most strongest argument against Feminism and Women's Empowerment yet.

That "45% of all women will be single and childless by 2030" has spooked governments around the world. And the first tentative steps to stripping women of their rights have started in earnest... beginning with Indonesia and South Korea. Indonesia's ban on premarital sex is a preemptive strike against this statistic. And South Korea's president Yoon Suk-yeol (overwhelmingly voted for by young men who expressly pointed out they don't want women empowered) is already working to abolish the country's Women's ministry and is busy doing away with gender parity laws declaring no one will be promoted cause of gender but only cause if merit. Something the West would consider akin to blasphemy. see Pic 2,3,4 below.

But this analysis will need a seperate presentation....


South Korean link: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-63905490

Indonesian link:
https://edition.cnn.com/2022/12/05/asia/indonesia-new-code-passed-sex-cohabitation-intl-hnk/index.html

ubunja:
hey man,, orgasm during rape is a frequently documented phenomenon and a simple Google search will show you. a lot of the things that are to do with sex and reproduction are actually placed beyond morality - meaning sex will be pleasurable whether or not it's consented and babies will be made whether or not a woman wants it. those things are placed beyond women to control. Just like a woman unconscious in a coma can actually get pregnant if a man has sex with her and the pregnancy grow and the womb actually push the baby out by itself after 9 months,, so things like pleasure and orgasms are also automatic. It's all about stimulation. whether wanted or not.

Now let's flip that story:
let's say robbers capture a brother and a sister and force the two to have sex. Even though the brother is disgusted by it all, he's still going to get an erection. and during sex he will even reach an orgasm himself. cause it's not up to him. it's the biology at work. and biology can be purely mechanical.

same way with the original story: A woman can get an orgasm during rape . the way many victims describe this is by saying "My body betrayed me".

ahnie:
I have this beautiful chubby neighbor that's from my husband extraction (Igbo)
Babe is hard working, business oriented and an avid hustler.

But she's dating a chubby fuvk boy,a failed yahoo lazy lout that even in the next 50yrs I do not see him ever picking.

He's killing and bringing down my neighbors business and sucking her dry and she doesn't seemed to noticed.

She's always crying of bn broke everytime....and it's damn pissing me off like fvck.

On his birthday she baked cakes for him,printed his name on mugs, towels, got him clothes and even travelled to visit him,left her business and stayed days with him before coming back.

It's irking me because he's a bad market and to me he doesn't have a bright future,he's not working,he has no handiwork and no skills
He's just a rotund whale sucking her youthfulness and finances.

Let's assume he has a skill or he's learning a trade it's another thing, at least we would all assume that he's productive and her supporting him wouldn't be futile,but this one.... nothing nothing.

On her birthday he didn't even posted her pictures or got her a pin,he said he doesn't have data...just negodu the nonsense and he still demanded money from her....to me the guy is just miserably useless.

He's now proposing marriage to her,and he visited her some days ago na she use her money run everything from feeding down to blood test.

I have not met him before,but immediately I saw him....my spirit no conform with his at all...he's not only a liability,but also a robust reaper.

Now my neighbor is asking me what I think of him.....I told her outrightly that I don't like him,that he's going to be a liability to her in the future....person nor fit take care of her as girlfriend,how e go take care of her as wife.....I m one hundred percent sure,she's the one that's going to pay her prideprice, pay for the wedding and feed herself.

She's trying to convince me to like him....but this isoko woman ain't capping that shiit.

I just detest fvck lazy boiz.

scrolldown88:
Damn
Sometimes en, e good make pesin get problem. Because all this rubbish is caused by lack of any real problem. Pesin wey get serious wahala, both personal and family wahala no go every fit reason to tattoo eyeball.

What rubbish

God settle down create you perfect, you say you wan add your own join.

And to think her kid tried to warn her. Just pathetic.
That kid now would forever be ashamed to show her mum off.

Who dey even give una moni to dey do all they rubbish?
Fuel no add moni for una side?
School fee no cost?

Why pesin go get moni do this kind thing, when others dey languish in hunger and suffer.

This life no truly balance