₦airaland Forum

OkCornel:
Awww, I’m happy you can see anyone who mirrors your thought process as a fool.

I have never seen KnownUnknown, he does not exist.

An imposter or chatbot could be behind the moniker.

Chatting on nairaland is not enough proof of his existence

Dumb ass.

Numerous secular scholars have presented their own versions of the so-called “Historical Jesus” – and most of them are, as biblical scholar J.D. Crossan puts it, “an academic embarrassment.”

OkCornel:
Fringe theorist forming woke. Unfortunately you’re worse off than a slave.

Now play the ostrich and argue with all scholars of antiquity on the existence of Jesus Christ.

In your tiny mind, you’ve assumed everyone of them to be religious with sympathy for Christianity.

Dumb ass. Adopting the language of white racists who think labeling everything “woke” is a valid criticism.
If your minuscule mind was capable of critical thinking, you wouldn’t be parading “historical Jesus” around.

OkCornel:
Thanks for passing the verdict on your own thought process.

I just mirrored it to you.

Lmao. Says the fools who thinks a story that includes a ghost-screwing virgin is evidence of historical person.

OkCornel:
Tell that to all scholars of antiquity.

The ultimate joke is on you if you really think all these historians and scholars are religious people. Jeez!

Basic logic

You are the punchline of the ultimate joke. Jeez.
Basic logic should show you that there is no proof of a historical Jesus. But your profile pic shows your are thoroughly incapable of that.

OkCornel:
And the Jewish rabbi does not care whether you’re religious or not. Jesus Christ existed, argue their history with them since you know their history better than them.

Jesus did not exist. Continue to be a slave.

OkCornel:
I have never seen KnownUnknown, he does not exist

That’s not surprising given how you can’t tell fact from fiction.

OkCornel:
Support the religious lores of Jewish rabbis?
KnownUnknown continues with his jokes…
Who gives a damn about the support Christians give the state of Israel?

Does it invalidate the writings (midrash) of ancient Jewish rabbis on the existence of Jesus?

Entertain me some more abeg

Lowrash, Midrash, or Highrash of ancient or modern Jewish rabbis do not matter.
Incredible and implausible stories do not become true because a Jewish rabbi said they are true.

OkCornel:
Oh now the goalpost shifts. Did the Jewish rabbis deny the existence of Jesus Christ? Yes or No.

EXISTENCE, EXISTENCE

I don’t care what religious scholars accept or deny. A jewish rabbi is not an authority to people who aren’t religious. A jewish rabbi wouldn’t deny the existence of Moses or his god but that doesn’t mean Moses spoke to he god on Mt. Sinai.

OkCornel:
Who knows, your existence might be as real as Prometheus too?

Hi Prometheus…

At least I exist, unlike Jesus.

OkCornel:
Oh now the goalpost shifts. Did the Jewish rabbis deny the existence of Jesus Christ? Yes or No.

EXISTENCE, EXISTENCE

EXISTENCE, EXISTENCE hasn’t been proven.

What is the support for this EXISTENCE EXISTENCE?

OkCornel:
Good, now argue that out with the Jewish scholars and historians. Would be epic to see you make a mockery of yourself

What’s there to argue? Jewish myths are just myths. Their Jesus is as real as Prometheus.

OkCornel:
And the clown continues with his rant. Let me guess, Jewish Rabbis are Christian sympathisers too right?

Of course. The Jesus story is supposed to be support for their religious lore after all. So, why wouldn’t they accept part of the story that they have no problem with. For example, Given the support the state of Israel gets from Christians, why would a Jewish rabbi upset the apple cart?

You think Jewish Rabbis support your historical Jesus but do you still regard their opinion when they deny the core of the story I.e. “son of god”?

OkCornel:
In other words, KnownUnknown is telling us the historians and scholars in the screenshots below believe in fiction.

I didn’t know “historians and scholars” are infallible and are incapable of believing fiction.

OkCornel:
Fringe theorists. Kindly argue with the scholars Jesus Christ never existed nau?

Thorough research has been undertaken on this, and those with your viewpoint are seen as quacks.

Jesus never existed. No arguments needed when you have no proof. A bunch of “scholars” with Christian sympathies calling something “fringe” doesn’t matter.

OkCornel:
Dear Nairalanders, KnownUnknown suddenly knows better than first century historians who attested to the existence of Jesus Christ.

Let’s get entertained.

KnownUnknown suddenly knows the history of the Jews better than the Jews themselves.

Knownunknown doesn’t know the history of Jews better than them but knownunknown obviously knows how to tell fact from fiction, unlike OKCornel.

OkCornel:
Oh my, Tacitus, Suetonius and Josephus wrote about someone who never existed?

Entertain me more some more. Your thought process is a comedy show. You’ll give comedians a run for their money.

Tacitus never mentioned Jesus but Chrestus. Seutonius never mentioned Jesus but Chresto.
Hell, there is no reason why they couldn’t have been followers of Serapis Chrestus instead of Jesus being that there would have been Jewish worshippers of Serapis Chrestus.
The only clown is the one who thinks magical things happen to Jews and their myths are true.

OkCornel:
And by the way, who told you these historians and scholars relied on the New Testament only to arrive at their conclusion?

Let me guess, the Antiquities of the Jews written by first century historian - Josephus Flavius is also a fairytale right?

No offence, I don’t have time for silly arguments.

When you are ready to provide evidences of Jewish historians and scholars unanimously denying the existence of Jesus Christ, let me know.

Josephus is not proof of Jesus. Clear interpolations in Josephus do not prove that Jesus existed. If Josephus really wrote about Jesus, it would have been more than a couple of sentences mentioning the guy in passing.

They claim Josephus wrote “….if he could have been called a man”. Wouldn’t such a character require more than a passing mention.

You don’t have time for silly arguments? Boy, your beliefs are the epitome of silly.

OkCornel:
Simple questions, do you know the history of the Jews better than the Jews themselves?

Can you provide evidences of Jewish scholars and historians denying the existence of Jesus Christ?

If you can’t, don’t spam my mentions.

I don’t need to know the history of the Jews better than them to reject tall tales, fairy tales, and other bullshit.

And this ridiculous question you keep posing is just plain stupid. “Deny the existence of Jesus” my ass. Shouldn’t it be confirm the existence?!!

I’ll spam your mentions anytime I want. Pray to the Chicago boy to stop me.

OkCornel:
Oh, you think there’s nobody in the past or present that looks exactly like you? Humour me a bit.

By the way, see the position of leading Jewish scholars and historians on the existence of Jesus Christ.

Feel free to argue with them if you know their history better than them.

So acceptance of New Testament myth by a jewish “religious scholars” means that Jesus existed?

I see that there is no actual historian, Jewish or otherwise, to claim magic Jew existed. Not surprising. Please, don’t start presenting interpolations in Josephus’ works as support.

Back to the “scholars”. Their opinion doesn’t matter a lick. A bunch of religious scholars accepting the claims in a religious book doesn’t make the claims of the book true. And if the New Testament is the sole support for these “scholars”, then they have no standing.
For those that don’t venerate Jews, the opinion of their religious “scholars” is just that, opinion.

An Arab religious scholar regarding the Quran as “true” doesn’t make it so.


When HISTORIANS investigated the historicity of Moses, they didn’t just rely on the Old Testament.
The opinion of “scholars” did not matter a lick.

OkCornel:
Not my cup of tea if a Chicago carpenter looks like Jesus.

I guess doppelgänger is a strange term for you.

By the way, have you heard any updates from Jewish historians and scholars unanimously denying ”the existence” of Jesus Christ?


Keep me posted.

Lmao, it’s a doppelgänger now? I thought it was Jesus.
I guess we would hear of Jewish historians and “ scholars”unanimously denying the existence of a mythical character if that was part of their Job description.

Have Jewish historians and “scholars” confirmed the existence of Jesus?

Do we have the name and address of the Ghost that screwed the virgin?

OkCornel:
Yes bro, mix the truth with a little lie and error, you can easily deceive and manipulate the majority..

Lmao.
Have you found a Jewish historian to refute the Jesus myth yet or have you figured out that the magical jew born of a virgin is an example of “mix the truth with a little lie and error, you can easily deceive and manipulate the majority”

Have you prayed to the Chicago carpenter today?

This person put it succinctly:
“She painted a realistic picture of some white dude from Chicago. To Christians who worship white Jesus, she painted Jesus. To people who don’t have their heads up their rectums, she painted a white dude from Chicago.”

MindHacker9009:
Early Christians were followers of Chrestus now Christ. Temple of Serapis Chrestus.

Serapis this, Serapis that. Jewphile, what about Moses? No evidence that “the god whisperer” existed and the one ethnographical story about him claims he was an “atheist”.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/leading-archaeologist-says-old-testament-storeis-are-fiction-1500431.html?amp
ABRAHAM, Jacob, Moses, King David, and King Solomon in all his splendour, never existed, a 15-year study of archaeological evidence has concluded.

The study - by Professor Thomas Thompson, one of the world's foremost authorities on biblical archaeology - says that the first 10 books of the Old Testament are almost certainly fiction, written between 500 and 1,500 years after the events they purport to describe.

MindHacker9009:
Early Christians were followers of Chrestus now Christ. Temple of Serapis Chrestus.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aM-tfvkMziA

Serapis Chrestus is not Jesus. Some of you show how ill educated you are with the way you post nonsense. You post this YouTube video as if the person is an infallible authority when she is just talking out of her ass.
There is no reason to think Serapis Chrestus is Jesus Christ. The Christians are said to have destroyed and appropriated other religions’ artifacts, so the most you can say is that maybe the Christian’s got their image of Jesus from Serapis’ image.

You can even say that the Chrestians is Tacitus were worshippers if Serapis waiting for the return of Chrestus, thereby possibly causing the fire in Rome (deliberately or because of their nocturnal activities) and that mention of Judea was a later interpolation by Christian priests.
What you can’t claim is that Serapis Chrestus is Jesus Christ. Also, if you understood the allegorical meaning of Christ, you’d have an idea why Serapis was “bull” and Jesus a “lamb”.

Also, you don’t know anything the “early Christians” believe since Christianity as packaged in just the Roman interpretation of an ancient fairy tale.

peggywebbs:
Because I'm nice, I'll give you a hint on why prophecies are meant to be interpreted and not taken literally. For instance in Nehum 2:4

Chariots dash wildly through the streets, rushing to and fro through the city squares. They flash like torches and dart about like lightning.
Nahum 2:4 GNBDK

https://bible.com/bible/431/nam.2.4.GNBDK

If I were to give your interpretation, I'd have said the Prophet was talking about horses. No, the time he wrote this, cars were not even dreamt of. But this was the old testament and this man who had never seen an engine in his life or even a light bulb.. describe a busy street with many cars on wheels and headlamps on traffic.

You’re delusional and duplicitous like the typical Christian. I’ll just post the chapter so people can see your stupidity laid bare. Cars my black ass. It’s just psycho jew god and his chosenites stealing and killing again.

The Fall of Nineveh

1Nineveh, you are under attack!
The power that will shatter you has come.
Prepare the defences!
Guard the road!
Prepare for battle!
2(The LORD is about to restore the glory of Israel, as it was before her enemies plundered her.)
3The enemy soldiers carry red shields
and wear uniforms of red.
They are preparing to attack!
Their chariots flash like fire!
Their horses prance!
4Chariots dash wildly through the streets,
rushing to and fro through the city squares.
They flash like torches
and dart about like lightning.
5The officers are summoned;
they stumble as they press forward.
The attackers rush to the wall
and set up the shield for the battering ram.
6The gates by the river burst open;
the palace is filled with terror.
7The queen is taken captive;
her servants moan like doves
and beat their breasts in sorrow.
8Like water from a broken dam
the people rush from Nineveh!
“Stop! Stop!” the cry rings out —
but no one turns back.
9Plunder the silver!
Plunder the gold!
The city is full of treasure!

Truvelisback:
Go play for Shit.

Lol

Liverpool should have paid the real African in their attack instead of this overhyped Arab.

ILiverpool should have paid the real African instead of this overhyped Arab.

Steep:
So where was it written that God demanded such sacrifice or they were done to him?

Here’s your Lord again you sable slave.

KnownUnknown:
@op, this jew god of yours is a certified maniac.

Ezekiel 20
25 So I gave them other statutes that were not good and laws through which they could not live; 26 I defiled them through their gifts—the sacrifice of every firstborn—that I might fill them with horror so they would know that I am the Lord.’

Steep:
So Abraham returned to his servants by himself means Abraham went back alone? You are truly an imbe_cile.
You lack comprehension, the worse is that you have a phobia for sound wisdom.

Yes, Abraham returned alone after the god told him the reward for “having done this and did not withhold your son”.

Dumb f#ck, it’s right there in your delusional face.

Steep:
You are the imbe_cile here.

Abraham demonstrated he was ready to obey God by his actions hence he was justified, it was God that stopped him.

To you imbe_cile, how can a God, who you imbe_cile, claimed to have accepted human sacrifice stop Abraham?

Brain addled negro Christian who can’t even understand what is written plainly. Is it the god or the “angel of the lord” that allegedly stopped him?

The interpolation that was meant to change the story says “angel of the lord” stopped him. Yet, they forgot to change the verse where Abraham returned to the servants by himself after slitting Isaac’s throat open like a sacrificial goat.

Steep:
you think insults make you smart? Mr imbe_cile.
Seems you have an avarice to wisdom.

Apart from the fact that you wouldn’t know smart even if it hits you in the face, my insults aren’t about that. They are to show I have no modicum of respect for you and your ilk.