₦airaland Forum

Lovelink1991:
➜What about if the tradition give the man the right to the woman will you also call that rape?

In 2026, your traditions have no power over you unless you give it power over yourself. It is that simple! 😒

Lovelink1991:
➜Not being rape, it is accepting to married the brother of the late husband. The headline is there. And the video is there when she was narrating the whole incident

If you say no to a man, and he refuses to take your answer, even going as far as to double down, threatening and manipulating you into saying yes to him, you are literally being raped by that man. 😒

Lovelink1991:
➜Some get off and landed in what is even worst than where they ran from. It is better you have a second thought before get off.

Yet reality shows, time and time again, that women are better off divorced than stuck in shithole marriages? 😒

I am more and more convinced that this endurance wife phenomenon is fueled by mental illness. 😒😒

Orinechi:
➜ Is only one family member who want her not the whole family members. What's wrong in accepting a dead husband brother's advance.
➜ At least the bloodline will continue.
➜ Tomorrow now she may Bleep a man who has thiefry or madness in his DNA and that will change everything in that family.

She said no to him already. There is everything wrong with the family insisting she should cave to being assaulted by a man she does not want. 😒

2. Why should the burden of continuing his bloodline be on her shoulders as one from a separate bloodline? 😒

3. Oh, so, she is better off submitting her womb to a man literally pretending rape and manipulation is the right way to forward his bloodline? 😒

Lovelink1991:
➜That is what every married woman is praying for but when the unfortunate arrives the family one married to will determine it

Wrong! Not every married woman out there is stewpid enough to get themselves tied up in such nonsense. Some are actually intelligent enough to know to get off the boat when they see it going the wrong way. 😒😒

Lovelink1991:
➜Are you suggesting that she should use the police to intermediate the family? To what end?

According to you, they might try to steal her wealth for not submitting to being raped by her brother-in-law. Would you rather she submit her va-jay-jay and womb to rape, and maybe even her life to her assaulters or something? Are you insinuating that involving the police and the law would be worse? 😒

Lovelink1991:
➜Maybe when you get to that bridge it will make more sense to you but as it stands the widow lady is making sense to her now

Better yet, avoid getting yourself in situations that would cause you to have to cut through such a path. 😒

Lovelink1991:
➜Family's might

What family might? Is this might greater than the police and the law? Think carefully before you respond. 😒

Lovelink1991:
➜Hmmmmm, it is not as easy as you said it because the family may withheld her late husband's wealth which she was supposed to use for the children

Withhold what wealth? By what law or means?😒

Lovelink1991:
➜Person is telling you her own life experiences of how the late husband's brother is disturbing her

Life experience? She get car. She no fit drive away from the potential rape of her life and children? 😒

babaidan:
I need honest opinions because this one really got to me
I am a man in my 30s, I went to an elderly woman’s shop for a business deal, the job requires me to send a detailed video explaining exactly what I want her to do
Because she is an elderly woman , She is not very very familiar with WhatsApp even though she uses android , so she gave my number to her daughter, the girl should be around 17 to 19, so I can send the videos through her
Now look at the screenshot I attached, the first thing I see is her calling me “Bro”
Bro
I had to pause because I could not believe it
In my upbringing, you don’t address someone clearly older than you like that, especially not someone you are dealing with for business, that kind of term is for your friends or people in your age group, not a grown man in his 30s
This is not casual chatting, this is something that involves work and possibly money
So now I am asking,
is this just how this generation talks now, or is this actually disrespect
am I overreacting or is it wrong for someone that young to address me like that in this kind of situation
if it was face to face, would she still say bro to me
and in a business setting, is it too much to expect something as simple as sir
because honestly it made me start questioning the seriousness of everything immediately
so I want to hear real opinions,
would you ignore it, correct her, or just walk away completely

Please, do the inner work of pulling the stick out of your arse before it is too late. 😒😒

BarristerWumi:
Good morning , what kind of animal could be creating these holes around my house, it does same to some soft shoes and I can hear it’s stomping as it runs or walks across the POP ceilings

Thank you for all insights and guesses

Looks like a hole created by some sort of rodent. Seems like you may have rat problems to me. 🥱🥱

Sonnobax15:

Probability cat.
Have been experiencing same thing too.

what sort of demon cat you dey describe? Why would a cat want to do any such? That does not look like any hole created from cat scratches. That looks more like something carved with small teeth and cats don't do any such. 🥱

AgentNairaland:
Are you this dense?
Atheist fascinated by the worship of orisa

Atheists are mostly religious folks, as their belief does not simply stop at a lack of belief(most of them seem certain that a god cannot exist, hence making them religious in their leaning). Tradition is also of religion. So, a so-called atheist who describes himself as one with spiritual awareness is definitely not an atheist but at least a traditionalist, as he claims. 🥱🥱

Nobel Laureate, Wole Soyinka, has stated that he does not believe in the God of either Christianity or Islam, describing himself instead as an atheist with strong spiritual awareness.
He made the remark during an interview with Larry Madowo on CNN, where he spoke about his personal beliefs and religious background.

Soyinka explained that he finds traditional Orisa worship more appealing than Christianity and Islam, citing its artistic, creative, and mysterious qualities. According to him, the traditional belief system is also more open and less associated with violence compared to the other two religions.

If this does not help you sort your confusion there, I don't know what else can. 🥱🥱

KobolanderSegun:
➜Very true. About the slavery thing all the people who think God is very Pro Slavery miss the story of Sarah and Haggai the slave girl. It is alledged an angel appeared to her and told her to return back that God had seen her suffering.
➜ If the Slavery was American style slavery no woman would offer a slave to her husband. American style slavery was the most brutal form of slavery there ever was and they were Christians.
➜ Or the Spanish inquisition that converted people to Christianity by the sword something that Jesus did not call for. If you live in the past the future will be very bleak

1. Because those stories do not fit the narrative they are interested in.

2. American slavery was humane compared to slavery under more ancient societies, such as the Huns, Islamics, etc.

3. The Spanish Inquisition primarily targeted Christian Jews who were suspected to have secretly converted back to Judaism. The move was driven by anti-Jewish ideals, not slavery.

MrEar:
Excellent write up but please be saving your energy David. The people you are talking to don't like truth. They love lies, like the one Britain told them in 1960. Leave them let them be suffering and smiling. That is their talent.

Nonsense! There is nothing brilliant about this take. It comes from a refusal to acknowledge the fact that Nigeria's decisions from the time of its independence have been wholly that of the Nigerian government and people. 😒

MrEar:
The Issue With Peter Obi - David Hundeyin
The basic issue with P.O. is the same issue I had until 2024 - he refuses to acknowledge that his platform is fundamentally anti-imperial. The idea of moving Africa's largest population "from consumption to production" is a fundamentally anti-imperialism idea.
The existence of Nigeria as a consumer-import-dependent, natural resource exporter that spends resource export revenues on imported finished goods without having an industrial base to manufacture its own, is not an accident of "poor leadership" - it is the direct goal of neo-colonialism.
When instead of manufacturing goods, Nigeria instead haemorrhages its natural resources and human talent, and only receives some insufficient USD resource rents in return, this ensured that Nigeria and its African contemporaries remain artificially poor, while people who live in places where for 6 months every year, the ground freezes solid and daily sunshine is only 5 hours, remain artificially wealthy.
That is the core of the Euro-American imperial system. The military branch of this imperial system is called NATO. The governance/policy arms are called IMF/World Bank. The economic arm is called WTO. The academic/social arms are the Foundations, NGOs, policy research institutes and universities. This is what P.O. is actually up against.
So if P.O. says he wants to "move Nigeria from consumption to production", it is the same thing as declaring war on Europe, its sugar daddy in Washington, and its spiritual leader in Tel-Aviv. And if you're going to do that, you need to be fully locked in, and you need to be prepared to lose everything of yours that is under the empire's control.

source

This is, at best, a nonsensical assessment of the problem and situation.

KobolanderSegun:
➜God never protected them from slavery . God even promised the Israelites he will get people to take them into slavery if they disobeyed him. Perhaps the whole slavery thing is a loss in translation. If I said " you are my dog " in 1970 people will call it derogatory, fast forward to today you are my dog is acceptable. I'm not making excuses for the bible. I remember when I used to hate God back in the day.
Even Moses if he Was alive I would have called International Court of Justice on his head.
Then I feel in love with this babe and Found God.
Whoever said God is Love was a Genius . Me I don't go to church I just live a life of Love.
Hate is like fire to ones soul. Love is like Cold Water

Over 90% of those who pretend to quote the book never actually take time to read through it to separate their delusions from what is in fact contained in it. And they are usually the gonads, quick to insist on judging all of history by present-day standards, which do not and should not apply. 😒

alobright17:
Is either you’re mad or blind , so in that screenshot you didn’t see the Bible verse? All church rats sef .

Next! 😒😒😒😒

alobright17:
So here didn’t show you how god instructed them not to take slave from isreal?

Are you having some sort of mental block? Where in Scripture does this claim of yours come from? 😒😒

alobright17:
explain this one first , why telling them strictly not to take slaves from isreal?

Before I can explain anything, you literally have to show me where it specifically states what you claim. At least, that way we can maybe get on the same page here. 😒

Also, as I mentioned earlier(someone else confirmed it too), the God of Israel eventually had more than 2/3rd of the Israelite population taken away as slaves to other nations. And this happened according to what is written in Deuteronomy 28, 29, 30, 31, and 32 which you have likely never read as well. 😒

alobright17:
Na only you know wetin you Dey read .

Read the book itself and form your own opinion from what is contained, not post what has already been digested by someone possibly ignorant of what is written in the book itself. 😒

alobright17:
➜your god is telling them where to go and get slaves and not within them .
➜ First your god supported slavery, that’s how mad that your god can be

1. The God of Israel also goes into detail as to how slaves were to be treated and freed from their debts. If you would take time to read through the 4 major books of Moses, which constitute the Constitutional Law of the ancient nation of Israel, you would find that a lot more than just what you assume is detailed in there. 😒

2. Slaves were the first goods ever sold by men. For the longest time, tribes and nations sold individuals as slaves; criminals were sold as slaves. And slaves were sold by all nations, people, and empires of this world. So, for you to expect that a nation that existed until about 2000 years ago would not have had in its books details on the having of slaves and their treatment is clearly you coming from a point of, as I said, blatant ignorance and arrogance. 😒

alobright17:
you were clearly reading where your god exempted them and you’re still arguing ?

You clearly didn't read what you posted. It says nothing of the Israelites being exempted from slavery. 😒

Also, I now see that you are operating from a point of blatant ignorance. 😒

1 Then God said to Moses, “These are the other laws that you will give to the people:
2 “If you buy a Hebrew[a] slave, then that slave will serve for only six years. After six years, he will be free, and he will have to pay nothing.
3 If he is not married when he becomes your slave, when he becomes free, he will leave without a wife. But if the man is married when he becomes your slave, then he will keep his wife at the time he is made free.
4 If the slave is not married, the master can give him a wife. If that wife gives birth to sons or daughters, she and her children will belong to the master. After the slave is finished with his years of service, he will be made free.
5 “But if the slave decides that he wants to stay with the master, he must say, ‘I love my master. I love my wife and my children. I will not become free—I will stay.’
6 If this happens, the master will bring the slave before God. The master will take the slave to a door or the wooden frame around the door and pierce the slave’s ear using a sharp tool to show that the slave will serve that master for all his life.
7 “A man might decide to sell his daughter as a slave. If this happens, the rules for making her free are not the same as the rules for making the men slaves free.
8 If the master who chose her for himself is not pleased with her, then he can sell the woman back to her father. If the master broke his promise to marry her, he loses the right to sell her to other people.
9 If the master promised to let the slave woman marry his son, he must treat her like a daughter, not like a slave.
10 “If the master marries another woman, he must not give less food or clothing to the first wife. And he must continue to give her what she has a right to have in marriage.
11 The man must do these three things for her. If he does not, the woman is made free, and it will cost her nothing. She owes no money to the man.
12 “Whoever hits and kills someone must be killed too.
13 But if an accident happens, and a person kills someone without planning it, then God allowed that thing to happen. I will choose some special places where people can run to for safety. So that person can run to one of those places.
14 But whoever plans to kill someone out of anger or hatred must be punished. Take them away from my altar[c] and kill them. - Exodus 21 vs 1 - 14

'There's a lot more where that came from and this is just a tip on the Slave laws as pertains both Hebrew and non-Hebrew Slaves. 😒😒

15 “Whoever hits their father or their mother must be killed.
16 “Whoever steals someone to sell them as a slave or to keep them for their own slave must be killed.
17 “Whoever curses their father or mother must be killed.
18 “Two men might argue and one might hit the other with a rock or with his fist. If the man who was hurt is not killed, the man who hurt him should not be killed.
19 If the man was hurt and must stay in bed for some time, the man who hurt him must support him. The man who hurt him must pay for the loss of his time. He must support him until he is completely healed.
20 “Sometimes people beat their slaves. If the slave dies after being beaten, the killer must be punished.
21 But if the slave gets up after a few days, then the master will not be punished. That is because someone paid their money for the slave, and the slave belongs to them.
22 “Two men might be fighting and hurt a pregnant woman. This might make the woman give birth to her baby before its time. If the woman was not hurt badly,[e] the man who hurt her must pay a fine. The woman’s husband will decide how much the man must pay. The judges will help the man decide how much the fine will be.
23 But if the woman was hurt badly, then the man who hurt her must be punished. The punishment must fit the crime. You must trade one life for another life.
24 You must trade an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, a hand for a hand, a foot for a foot,
25 a burn for a burn, a bruise for a bruise, a cut for a cut.
26 “If a man hits a slave in the eye, and the slave is blinded in that eye, then the slave will be allowed to go free. His eye is the payment for his freedom. This is the same for a man or a woman slave.
27 If a master hits his slave in the mouth, and the slave loses a tooth, then the slave will be allowed to go free. The slave’s tooth is payment for the slave’s freedom. This is the same for a man or a woman slave.
28 “If a man’s bull kills a man or woman, then you should use stones and kill that bull. You should not eat the bull. The owner of the bull is not guilty.
29 But if the bull had hurt people in the past, and if the owner was warned, then the owner is guilty. That is because he did not keep the bull tied or locked in its place. So if the bull is allowed to be free and kills someone, the owner is guilty. You should kill the bull with stones and also kill the owner.
30 But the family of the dead man may accept money. If they accept money, the man who owned the bull should not be killed. But he must pay as much money as the judge decides.
31 “This same law must be followed if the bull kills someone’s son or daughter.
32 But if the bull kills a slave, the owner of the animal must pay the master 30 pieces of silver.[f] And the bull must also be killed with stones. This law will be the same for men and women slaves. - Exodus 21 vs 15 - 32

Ignorance is a preventable and curable ailment. 😒

blokoncept:
-Did you know her husband had a child outside their marriage — and Christie raised that child herself for 20 years?
-Did you know Christie almost had an affair herself? Her own words.
-Did you know she is NOT divorced — she specifically said "separated"?
-Did you know her mother died of a broken heart from the SAME pattern — and it was her sister who finally woke her up?
-Did you know she is a certified lie detector examiner — and was married to a serial cheater for 32 years?
30

Turns out she is human after lsk and not something pure alien among us all. Whoop-tee-doo! 🥱🥱

alobright17:
✓ If you’ve read the useless book you’ll see where that useless god was instructing them to go buy slaves from other countries . You claimed to read the useless book yourself and you never seen this ?

1. You initially claimed that Israelites were exempted by their God from being used as slaves to which I responded that you were wrong. Israelites were to buy their own brothers and sisters(Israelites) a slaves, in addition to foreigners living in Israel (Non-israelite citizens of israel). And yes ,the Israelites were able to also purchase slaves from other nations who had slaves to sell. Do we conveniently ignore the one case because the other exists? 🥱🥱

alobright17:
✓ but your god protected Israelites from the same slavery in same so called era .

I am not certain I follow at all. Have you actually ever read the book for yourself, or are you merely looking to regurgitate the same nonsense that other ignorant folks out there are known for? 🥱🥱

Slavery was practiced in the nation of Israel described in Israelite Scripture where many Israelites served as slaves to their brothers and sisters in the land. Yes, slavery among the Israelites was codified and the acceptable treatment of slaves made clear. Also, on at least three major occasions, Israelites were taken as slaves into foreign lands by people of other lands. So, what God protected what people from slavery in what era? 🥱🥱🥱

alobright17:
✓ imagine what a grown African man is typing .
Your useless god that supported slavery is saying what ?

What is wrong with supporting slavery? Did you know that there exists at least one rational reason for slavery before the industrial era? 🥱🥱

Kanwulia:
✓ He should go and get tested and treated if exposed.
People should be more open with their partners or find partners with similar health backgrounds.
With the type of stigma associated with the disease, I can the wife’s selfish position.

There has to be more to the story than what is the OP. 🥱

udemzyudex:
Baba rest, God don give us the power to choose a president. Abi na God choose Tinubu wey dey show us shege?

That's exactly what he is saying there. 😒

iwaeda:
It is well with Nigeria.

Note since these men have been in power. 😒

Quest7777:
This kind of statement has the danger of making people docile and passive.
Since it has been decided by God, nothing anybody does now can change anything.

This is him essentially telling his people that their votes have already been tallied in the name of the one he, Adeboye, has accepted, and we all know who that is. 😒😒