verminnel: ✓ senseless talk!! A wife is supposed to be a help mate to her man ,thats the essence of marriage in its entirety. ✓ Marriage is Partnership!!! for crying out loud ,u cant kill the innocent man with pressing bills while u sit down doing nothing. ✓ Every right thinking woman knows that she also has to pull her weight by being productive to give her marriage a sort of balance.We are not in the stone age, Please!!!
A helpmate as defined by whom or what? The marriage contract that is signed by the man and woman in question? Or the religious delusions that you specifically operate under? 🥱🥱
2. Marriage as partnership only applies if and only if the couple in question chose to enter into the agreement that is marriage as partners and not as master-slaves, the default traditional option in much of Nigeria. 🥱🥱
3. The woman in question did pull her weight. She had two kids, keeps the home and even tried her hands at business for a while. What exactly are you dead set on blaming on this woman? 🥱🥱
funkmrflexx: ✓ I 've been married for 3 years now with 2 kids, I try my best to take care of my family but the economy has become very bad so it's no longer possible to take care of a family of 4 on just 1 income. When I had money, I setup a business for my wife because I want her to be engaged and also she can support with whatever she has from the business, but after a year the business crumbled with no results to show (she gave many excuses on why she can't continue the business), even after that I've tried engaging her on other endeavors but she's not always serious. ✓ Now she does nothing, she just presses phone and play games all day long, all the responsibilities are on me, basically everything from school fees, feeding, house rent to buying a cube of Maggi. I've tried talking to her several times but she will pretend to be serious and goes back to default settings, I'm tired and its really talking a tole on me, sometimes I just get angry at her for no reason and I don't even want to come home. ✓ It's not the fact the she's staying home that's the issue, its the fact the she's not showing any effort to try and do something. I'm tired because all the money I make is being used for feeding and running the house, I can't even save or even think about buying properties
1. You married a woman who had nothing doing and no skills. Then you tried forcing her to become business savvy without her showing before hand that she has necessary skills and temperament for such. And then wonder why it didn't work or why you have yet to, after 2 kids with her, made a business wiz out of her. Essentially, your plan to mold this woman into that which is of your dream failed and you are here to blame her for it. 🥱😩
2. She is a wife. She came to you as just a wife and you accepted, married and made her have your kids just as that. But with the economy how pinching your arse, you want to pretend she was supposed to magically transform into more than just the wife your married her as.)😩😩😩
3. She likely showed the same level of effort when you married her too. So what has changed if not you? Why are You desperately trying to blame her for what seems a you problem? 🥱🥱🥱
Reloadedisraelp: if we have government we should be happy because we have the crude.... infact this news is a blessing to Africa country with crude oil..
It can't be that. First the Strait of Hormuz is not closed as explained in the video below.
commoditiesnig: Very true.. the US didn’t think this thru before declaring war with Iran.. Most countries already feeling the heat with energy crisis
The Strait of Hormuz is not closed. Ship owners are simply refusing to take the risk since the area is the same region that was overrun by Iran-backed Houthis not long ago. 🥱🥱
ShalliFvckMe: Parents are also human beings. Some parents are immature despite age. Some parents are using their kids to learn how to parenting skills. Some of them know nothing about parenthood They just born kids and gamble with life. Anyhow they see it t they accept it. But pride won't let them admit they are clueless when it comes to raising kids. In Nigeria, 80% of parents are achiac, religious and old fashioned. That is a very dealy mixture
It's the majority who, at no point, even consider trying to do better by their kids that make it so very difficult to say anything positive about Nigerian parents as a whole. Children raised in Nigerian homes are victims. 🥱🥱
Racoon: This Daniel Bwala thinks everyone is stupid as he is. So everyone must be low in thinking as he is.
He's always been a low-IQ rat. Same for the Reno boy. So, why have Nigerian media interviewers refused to expose them as such to the entire nation before now? Why have they been allowed to interview without being floored each time in the same way as they were on Al-Jazeera? 🥱🥱
Ironfaceman: Thanks for your open opinion. I will try to get the book.
You can read "A Two-Hour Koran (A Taste of Islam)" by Bill Warner online and even download the pdf to read offline. It is literally about 90 pages long. It takes into account the chronological context established in the book, "Sirah Rasull Allah - The Life of Mohammed" by Ibn Ishaq. 🥱
THE Pact of Umar is the body of limitations and privileges entered into by treaty between conquering Muslims and conquered non-Muslims. We have no special treaty of this sort with the Jews, but we must assume that all conquered peoples, including the Jews, had to subscribe to it. Thus the laws cited below and directed against churches apply to synagogues too. The Pact was probably originated about 637 by Umar I after the conquest of Christian Syria and Palestine. By accretions from established practices and precedents, the Pact was extended; yet despite these additions the whole Pact was ascribed to Umar. There are many variants of the text and scholars deny that the text as it now stands could have come from the pen of Umar I; it is generally assumed that its present form dates from about the ninth century. The Pact of Umar has served to govern the relations between the Muslims and "the people of the book," such as Jews, Christians, and the like, down to the present day. In addition to the conditions of the Pact listed below, the Jews, like the Christians, paid a head-tax in return for protection, and for exemption from military service. Jews and Christians were also forbidden to hold government office. This Pact, like much medieval legislation, was honored more in the breach than in the observance. In general, though, the Pact increased in stringency with the centuries and was still in force in the 20th century in lands such as Yemen. The Pact is in Arabic.
ChizzyBuna: ➜That is why it is called Evolution From Ape to Humans. We should be better than our parents. ➜ My senior brother had some suicidal thoughts battling depression but my mum was just shouting at him telling him to be a MAN. Whenever my bro will tell her to leave him alone. She will double the insults and start comparing him to his mates that are abroad. I love my mother but that woman is still a child.
Humans ceased to be apes 10s of thousands of years ago. What you are dealing with is not evolution, but rather intentional ignorance weaponized against you and your siblings by your parents.
2. Your brother did well by demanding she leave him alone with her ignorance. Please, tell him to seek help away from his parents to help him work on his illness. 🥱🥱
hassinho707: ➜No one is denying what the verses say. The issue is that verses must be read in their full context, not isolated and given a meaning the text itself does not support. For example, in the **, ** 5:33 explicitly describes people who “wage war and spread corruption in the land.” That is clearly describing violent criminals who attack society, not ordinary people who simply follow another religion. Your second claim about “32 different Qurans” is also a common misunderstanding. Muslims use the same Arabic Qur'an worldwide. What you are referring to are different translations into English and other languages not different scriptures. Even in the earliest manuscripts the Arabic text has remained the same.
Again, this is all false information you spew here regarding what is stated in Surah Al-Maidah vs 33. The Pact of Umar, from the 7th-9th century rule of Islam over the Kafirs, instead reveals that the Surah Al-Maidah vs 33 was instituted against any of the Kafirs who would attempt to violate the Dhimmi status imposed on them by the Mohammedans.🥱🥱
In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful. This is a document to the servant of Allah `Umar, the Leader of the faithful, from the Christians of such and such city. When you (Muslims) came to us, we requested safety for ourselves, children, property, and followers of our religion. We made a condition on ourselves that:
➜We will neither erect in our areas a monastery, church, or a sanctuary for a monk, ➜Nor restore any place of worship that needs restoration ➜ Nor use any of them for the purpose of enmity against Muslims. ➜ We will not prevent any Muslim from resting in our churches whether they come by day or night, ➜ and we will open the doors [of our houses of worship] for the wayfarer and passerby. ➜ Those Muslims who come as guests, will enjoy boarding and food for three days. ➜ We will not allow a spy against Muslims into our churches and homes or hide deceit [or betrayal] against Muslims. ➜ We will not teach our children the Qur'an, ➜ Publicize practices of Shirk (polytheism), ➜ Invite anyone to Shirk ➜ or prevent any of our fellows from embracing Islam, if they choose to do so. ➜ We will respect Muslims, ➜ Move from the places we sit in if they choose to sit in them. ➜ We will not imitate their clothing, caps, turbans, sandals, hairstyles, speech, nicknames and title names, ➜ or ride on saddles, ➜ Hang swords on the shoulders, collect weapons of any kind or carry these weapons. ➜ We will not encrypt our stamps in Arabic, ➜ or sell liquor. ➜ We will have the front of our hair cut, ➜ Wear our customary clothes wherever we are, ➜ Wear belts around our waist, ➜ Refrain from erecting crosses on the outside of our churches ➜ and demonstrating them and our books in public in Muslim fairways and markets. ➜ We will not sound the bells in our churches, except discretely, ➜ or raise our voices while reciting our holy books inside our churches in the presence of Muslims, ➜ Nor raise our voices [with prayer] at our funerals, ➜ or light torches in funeral processions in the fairways of Muslims, or their markets. ➜ We will not bury our dead next to Muslim dead, ➜ or buy servants who were captured by Muslims. ➜ We will be guides for Muslims and refrain from breaching their privacy in their homes.' ➜ We will not beat any Muslim.
These are the conditions that we set against ourselves and followers of our religion in return for safety and protection. If we break any of these promises that we set for your benefit against ourselves, then our Dhimmah (promise of protection) is broken and you are allowed to do with us what you are allowed of people of defiance and rebellion.' The Pact of Uma
ChizzyBuna: ➜My dad will watch fake A.I video and swear with his life that it is real video. He spends the night watching those fake A.I videos of white house burning. Then come out to show my siblings shouting that the world will soon come to an end. No matter how you try to explain that it is A.I It will suddenly turn to argument. My mother own na just pikin. She has the emotional intelligence of a 6 year old. You can ask her a question and she will reply you with another question. Everything feels like argument for her. Like you no fit sit both of them down and explain technology to them. They will be looking at you like fowl. I love my parents but dem mumu no be small. Carry church for head like Firewood
Make certain you do not turn out like your parents to your own kids. 🥱🥱
@ Ironfaceman, the following is in response to your post, "Does The Koran Support Terrorism?"
First, please pick up or download a copy of "A Two-Hour Koran (A Taste of Islam)" and "Sharia Law for Non-Muslims (A Taste of Islam)", both by Bill Maher, if you are not versed on what the Quran and Hadiths say on any subject. These are condensed, unbiased documents to help you and anyone who wishes to know about Islam. 🥱🥱
Nairaland seems to hate it when one tries to post facts about Islam. That much I have come to realize at this point. So, to honestly answer your question, I would suggest that you pick up the books above and try to read through them for yourself. The first book contains at least 100 references commanding violence against those who are not Mohammedans. And the second book details the conquests carried out by the founder of the political system that is Islam, all under a period of about 23 years, against people who did not care for his ideology. 🥱🥱
The primary reason why those who claim to be moderate in their beliefs do not speak out against the atrocities is that they understand that even that aspect that they do not engage in is part and parcel of their very belief system. 🥱🥱
hassinho707: ➜...So when these verses are read in their proper context, they are addressing freedom of belief, social order, and criminal justice — not forcing people into Islam. Criticism is fine, but it should be based on accurate readings of the text rather than selective interpretations.
It is draining the way you continue to deny the information literally presented in each of the verses...even after the other verses that are in the same context are present to help you...
Anyways, the internet has made at least 32 different versions of the Quran available to anyone out there willing to read. And we all know that the true Mohammedans are not those of you who claim you are moderates, but rather those we refer to as fundamentalists, the terrorists as well. Islam, from Mohammed's very own example, was never designed as the peaceful religion we are being gaslighted into believing today, and never was. 🥱
hassinho707: ➜In fact, the Qur’an itself clearly states: “There is no compulsion in religion” (Qur’an 2:256). If Islam commanded killing people just for being against Islam, this verse would not exist. ➜Historically, Muslims lived alongside Jews and Christians for centuries under Muslim rule. If Islam commanded the killing of anyone who disagreed with it, those communities would not have survived. ➜ So Qur’an 5:33 is about punishment for violent criminals who wage war and spread chaos in society — not a command to kill people simply for disagreeing with Islam.
1. Surah Al-Baqarah instead states, "Let there be no compulsion in religion, for the (Allah's) truth stands out clearly from falsehood." Essentially, the passage makes abundantly clear that only those religions that hold the claims of Allah have no compulsion against them. All other religions are to be brought under submission to Allah's truth. That is clearly not a religion that tolerates any others. 🥱🥱
2. That never happened! There is no historical situation, since the time of Mohammed, until now, in which Muslims considered themselves equal citizens of any land with the Jews, especially under Islamic rule. Jews were particularly regarded as Dhimmis(second-class citizens)in pretty much all of the Islamic world, even to this day. 🥱🥱
3. There is no statement made in Surah Al-Maidah regarding violent crimes. The verse, which I have posted several times now, simply states that all those who do not accept Allah and Mohammed are subject to death, maiming, or exile. No need to add ideas to the passage that are not suggested there. 🥱🥱
hassinho707: ➜Second, your interpretation of Qur’an 5:33 is incorrect. The verse does not say that anyone who simply disagrees with Islam should be killed. The verse clearly says: “those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and spread corruption in the land.” Classical Islamic scholars explain that this refers to violent criminals such as bandits, rebels, or people who terrorize society — not ordinary people who simply hold different beliefs.
1. The same literal interpretation applied to Surah Al-Maidah 32 is applied to Surah Al-Maidah 33. So, why are you attempting to ignore what is literally written to assert something different? 🥱🥱
2. Ibn Kathir's Tafsir on Surah Al-Maidah vs 33 instead makes it abundantly clear that, despite the ruling supposedly given by Allah specifically to the children of Israel as detailed in Surah Al-Maidah vs 32, what is prohibited to Mohammedans is the shedding of the blood of fellow Mohammedans/a soul that Allah has forbidden killing of(even that, as we will see later, is dependent on circumstances). 🥱
(And if anyone saved a life...) means, he refrains from killing a soul. Al-`Awfi reported that Ibn `Abbas said that Allah's statement, (it would be as if he killed all mankind. .) means, "Whoever kills one soul that Allah has forbidden killing, is just like he who kills all mankind.'' Sa`id bin Jubayr said, "He who allows himself to shed the blood of a Muslim, is like he who allows shedding the blood of all people. He who forbids shedding the blood of one Muslim, is like he who forbids shedding the blood of all people.'' In addition, Ibn Jurayj said that Al-A`raj said that Mujahid commented on the Ayah,
The only lives precious to Islam are lives that Allah himself has forbidden the killing of, not all of humanity or all souls. 🥱🥱
hassinho707: ➜You are correct that Qur’an 5:32 mentions that the rule was written for the Children of Israel. However, your conclusion is not accurate. In the Qur’an, Allah often mentions laws given to previous nations in order to teach moral lessons to Muslims and humanity in general. The Qur’an repeatedly reminds Muslims of the teachings given to earlier prophets such as Moses and Jesus. ➜ The verse does not mean that the sanctity of life applies only to the Children of Israel. In fact, the very next verse (Qur’an 5:33) condemns those who spread violence and corruption in the land. Furthermore, the Prophet Muhammad also clearly prohibited killing innocent people. In authentic hadith, he forbade the killing of women, children, monks, and civilians even during war. ➜ So when extremist groups kill innocent people, they are violating both the Qur’an and the teachings of the Prophet. The Qur’an frequently refers to previous scriptures to show that the moral principles of God are consistent across time. The message is clear: human life is sacred, and unjust killing is a grave sin. ➜ Therefore, the verse still demonstrates the Islamic principle that innocent life must be protected. If Islam allowed killing innocent people, why did the Prophet forbid killing women, children, monks, and farmers during war?
1. Laws that apply to other people do not apply to Mohammedans. That is what Surah Al-Maidah 5 vs 32 points to. 🥱🥱
2. Wrong!Surah Al-Maidah 5 vs 33 does not say any of what you claim. Rather, it insists that all those who are against Allah and Mohammed should be killed or maimed and exiled, which constitutes disgrace in this world and the next. Allah declares death on those who want nothing to do with Allah and Mohammed, aka those who are against or speak out against them. 🥱🥱
3. Wrong! Mohammedans, those whom you regard as extremists, in fact, uphold Allah's words as expressed there in Surah Al-Maidah 5 vs 33. 🥱🥱
4. These leaps of yours are clearly against the content of Surah Al-Maidah. Allah calls for the death, crucifixion, maiming, and/or exiling of those who are against Allah and Mohammed, as is written. 🥱🥱 Seun
➜Many people associate Islam with terrorism because some violent groups claim to act in the name of Islam. But it is important to separate the actions of criminals from the teachings of the religion itself. In Islam, the killing of innocent human beings is strictly forbidden. T[b]he Qur’an clearly states that killing one innocent person is like killing all of humanity, and saving one life is like saving all of humanity (Qur’an 5:32).[/b] ➜Islam teaches that human life is sacred, regardless of religion, race, or nationality.
1. This claim of yours regarding the Quran is false. 🥱
When you closely examine Surah Al-Maidah (Chapter 5) verse 32, you will find that it instead points to a command that was supposedly handed down by Allah to the Muslims(according to the text) only to the children of Israel, as shown in the image below. I believe this is Mohammed's attempt at referencing one of the Ten Commandments handed down by Moses to the children of Israel. 🥱🥱
2. This only verse you referenced cannot be used in reference to Mohammedans. Therefore, it is false to claim that Islam teaches any of what you claim, as there are numerous verses and passages from both the Quran and Haddiths which instead insist that Allah's commandments to Mohammedans held no regard for life, even that of Mohammedans. If you are open, we can contextually review as many of the Sunahs on this.🥱🥱
vaxx: No it is because you really don't understand the shia Islamic philosophy. American/ isreal actually help the man actualized his dream . How the man died is what many Shia Muslim are praying for . Martyrdom. Below is the part of the Quranic verse backing it up. Never say that those martyred in the cause of Allah are dead—in fact, they are alive! But you do not perceive it.” — Al Qur'aan [2:154 The man actually prays to die this way .
Why are you lot quick to twist the meaning of the word to suit your delusion whenever you please? 🥱🥱
A shahid (martyr) is someone who bears witness to their faith through the ultimate sacrifice. While often associated with defending the community in battle, the concept extends to those defending their life, property, or family.
Khomeini did not die fighting, as suggested.
Also, the Quranic, as well as Prophetic tradition (Hadith), strictly forbids the killing of non-combatants, women, and children, and does not equate martyrdom with suicide or terrorism.
Khomeini literally killed 10s of thousands of non-combatant women and children only some weeks ago.🥱🥱
capetownboyz: ➜... I insisted she needs to learn a proper skill or go back to school or get a good job for the time being , but all she cares is me opening a business for her ➜ ..I found myself looking at someone who depends solely on what a man provides for her and not trying to do something herself for the time being ➜ .. The pressure is much and I still have a child to take care of too ..She took my properties and ran away with my child and I was heart broken by such move .. ➜ Now it’s open to both families the decision she took and my parents are angry saying I won’t settle for such a woman and her parents aren’t helping much except her father who calls her out for her wrongful actions .. ➜ At this point I’m thinking of letting go of what we had together and just take care of my child and her wellbeing ,first by renting a place for her and taking care of her needs .. We have both had a long conversation thinking what went wrong, she said my lack of emotional presence and not spending enough time with her made her felt like she was single and I was telling her words and those words hurt her and that I’m being influenced by my family which is not true .. ➜ I want to get back my properties and call off my ties with her cause we really started on a wrong note , we didn’t plan well and didn’t see things properly and what we have to offer ourselves individually as a couple rather than a one man game stressing himself out there, trying to do everything himself..Have made wrong choices and this not how I intended my family life to be like and I will make good corrections henceforth..
1. You went out of your way to find a woman who had no skills and education at all to date, only to then try to force her to get all those things after you had literally pinned her down with a child? Why? Why would you do that to yourself or think it made sense for you to do?🥱
2. You literally presented yourself to her as someone who would provide for her(you knew she had no skills or job-worthy education before you chose to date, and then impregnate her), only to then change your mind after she married you. Why would you do that to yourself, though? 🥱🥱🥱
3. You can get the police involved since you feel she unjustly took your property. 🥱🥱
4. Her parents and your parents should have nothing to do with this since this was a marriage between two grown human beings(unless we are talking here of an underage girl whom you may have impregnated). 😐😐
5. You say that like you have some other option. Someone stated that it could be post-partum depression related, but even then, I suggest you not do any gragra here and accept things as they are, at least for now. I mean, you did say she told you she was unhappy all the time she was with you? What more does she need to say for you to know that letting go and taking care of matters concerning the child you have with her is what is left for you to do at this point? 🥱🥱
6. I would not recommend you go there by yourself. I suggest you both get lawyers involved at this point since you have both decided to call it quits. 🥱🥱